Search

Self-interested behavior from individuals can collectively lead to poor societal outcomes. These outcomes can seemingly be improved through the actions of altruistic agents, which benefit other agents in the system. However, it is known in specific contexts that altruistic agents can actually induce worse outcomes compared to a fully selfish population -- a phenomenon we term altruistic perversity. This paper provides a holistic investigation into the necessary conditions that give rise to altruistic perversity. In particular, we study the class of two-strategy population games where one sub-population is altruistic and the other is selfish. We find that a population game can admit altruistic perversity only if the associated social welfare function is convex and the altruistic population is sufficiently large. Our results are a first step in establishing a connection between properties of nominal agent interactions and the potential impacts from altruistic behaviors.

Self-interested routing polices from individual users in a system can collectively lead to poor aggregate congestion in routing networks. The introduction of altruistic agents, whose goal is to benefit other agents in the system, can seemingly improve aggregate congestion. However, it is known in that in some network routing problems, altruistic agents can actually worsen congestion compared to that which would arise in the presence of a homogeneously selfish population. This paper provides a thorough investigation into the necessary conditions for altruists to be guaranteed to improve total congestion. In particular, we study the class of series-parallel non-atomic congestion games, where one sub-population is altruistic and the other is selfish. We find that a game is guaranteed to have improved congestion in the presence of altruistic agents (even if only a small part of the total population) compared to the homogeneously selfish version of the game, provided the network is symmetric, where all agents are given access to all paths in the network, and the series-parallel network for the game does not have sub-networks which emulate Braess's paradox -- a phenomenon we refer to as a Braess-resistant network. Our results appear to be the most complete characterization of when behavior that is designed to improve total congestion (which we refer to as altruism) is actually guaranteed to do so., Comment: 7 pages, 2 figures

In this study, we introduce a toll lane framework that optimizes the mixed flow of autonomous and high-occupancy vehicles on freeways, where human-driven and autonomous vehicles of varying commuter occupancy share a segment. Autonomous vehicles, with their ability to maintain shorter headways, boost traffic throughput. Our framework designates a toll lane for autonomous vehicles with high occupancy to use free of charge, while others pay a toll. We explore the lane choice equilibria when all vehicles minimize travel costs, and characterize the equilibria by ranking vehicles by their mobility enhancement potential, a concept we term the mobility degree. Through numerical examples, we demonstrate the framework's utility in addressing design challenges such as setting optimal tolls, determining occupancy thresholds, and designing lane policies, showing how it facilitates the integration of high-occupancy and autonomous vehicles. We also propose an algorithm for assigning rational tolls to decrease total commuter delay and examine the effects of toll non-compliance. Our findings suggest that self-interest-driven behavior mitigates moderate non-compliance impacts, highlighting the framework's resilience. This work presents a pioneering comprehensive analysis of a toll lane framework that emphasizes the coexistence of autonomous and high-occupancy vehicles, offering insights for traffic management improvements and the integration of autonomous vehicles into existing transportation infrastructures.

The discipline of game theory was introduced in the context of economics, and has been applied to study cyber attacker and defender behaviors. While adaptions have been made to accommodate features in the cyber domain, these studies are inherently limited by the root of game theory in economic systems where players (i.e., agents) may be selfish but not malicious. In this SoK, we systematize the major cybersecurity problems that have been studied with the game-theoretic approach, the assumptions that have been made, the models and solution concepts that have been proposed. The systematization leads to a characterization of the technical gaps that must be addressed in order to make game-theoretic cybersecurity models truly useful. We explore bridges to address them., Comment: 21 pages, Finished October 17th, 2023

Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) communication is intended to improve road safety through distributed information sharing; however, this type of system faces a design challenge: it is difficult to predict and optimize how human agents will respond to the introduction of this information. Bayesian games are a standard approach for modeling such scenarios; in a Bayesian game, agents probabilistically adopt various types on the basis of a fixed, known distribution. Agents in such models ostensibly perform Bayesian inference, which may not be a reasonable cognitive demand for most humans. To complicate matters, the information provided to agents is often implicitly dependent on agent behavior, meaning that the distribution of agent types is a function of the behavior of agents (i.e., the type distribution is endogenous). In this paper, we study an existing model of V2V communication, but relax it along two dimensions: first, we pose a behavior model which does not require human agents to perform Bayesian inference; second, we pose an equilibrium model which avoids the challenging endogenous recursion. Surprisingly, we show that the simplified non-Bayesian behavior model yields the exact same equilibrium behavior as the original Bayesian model, which may lend credibility to Bayesian models. However, we also show that the original endogenous equilibrium model is strictly necessary to obtain certain informational paradoxes; these paradoxes do not appear in the simpler exogenous model. This suggests that standard Bayesian game models with fixed type distributions are not sufficient to express certain important phenomena., Comment: 8 pages, 2 figures