Search

Contains fulltext : 21863___.PDF (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)

A 9-year-old boy who since 3 years had been treated with a brace for presumed idiopathic thoracic scoliosis was referred because of severe syringomyelia on MRI of the spinal cord. Neuroimaging of the spinal cord had been performed because of back pain, although the patient had no neurological signs or symptoms. Besides extensive syringomyelia, the MRI revealed a type I Chiari's malformation which we assumed to be the primary cause of the syringomyelia and the subsequent scoliosis. Surgical decompression of the Chiari's malformation led to a remarkable reduction of the syringomyelia and to stabilisation of the scoliosis. In children with structural scoliosis, ancillary investigation in the way of neuroimaging of the spinal cord should be considered to exclude underlying spinal cord pathology, even in the absence of neurological abnormalities.

OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into the reporting and assessment of active termination of life in newborns in The Netherlands. DESIGN; Retrospective. METHOD: Data on all cases of deliberate termination of life in newborns up to the age of 6 months, reported to the public prosecutor as from 1997 onward, were collected and compared. RESULTS: In January 1997-June 2004, 22 cases of deliberate termination of life in newborns were reported. All cases concerned newborns with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. Deliberate termination of life was acceptable to the physicians because of the presence of hopeless suffering, with no means of alleviating the suffering. In all cases, at least 2 doctors were consulted outside the medical team. In 17 of 22 cases, a multidisciplinary spina bifida team was consulted. All parents consented to the termination of life; in 4 cases they explicitly requested it. In 14 cases a combination of analgesics, sedatives and paralyzing drugs were used, in 8 cases only analgesics and sedatives were administered. For the public prosecutor the termination of life was acceptable if 4 requirements were properly fulfilled: the presence of hopeless and unbearable suffering, consent of the parents to termination of life, consultation having taken place and a careful execution ofthe termination. The mean time between reporting of the case and the decision concerning prosecution was 5.3 months. None of the cases led to prosecution. CONCLUSION: Three cases of deliberate termination of life in newborns were reported in The Netherlands annually. The public prosecutor used fixed criteria to assess the case and all cases of active termination of life reported were found to be in accordance with good practice.

Although the child behavior checklist (CBCL) and the teacher's report form (TRF) were not designed for diagnosing psychopathology in children with chronic illnesses, they have become extensively used research tools to assess behavioural problems in paediatric populations, including children with epilepsy. When applied to children with epilepsy, items like "staring blankly" or "twitching" can be rated on the basis of seizure features rather than behaviour and, hence, render behavioural scores ambiguous. The aims were detection, and evaluation of the impact, of CBCL and TRF items eliciting ambiguity when applied to children with "epilepsy only" (idiopathic or cryptogenic epilepsy, attending normal schools). Experts identified items that give rise to interpretational ambiguity of the ratings in epilepsy. By treating ratings on these items as missing values, their effect was evaluated in CBCL and TRF scores of 59 schoolchildren with "epilepsy only" and age and gender matched healthy classmates. Seven items of the CBCL gave rise to ambiguity of which items 5 co-occur on the TRF. Rescoring reduced psychopathology scores in children with "epilepsy only", but not in those of healthy children: the percentage of patients trespassing the clinical cut off score, on at least one of the subscales, reduced from 46 to 23% on the CBCL and from 18 to 15% on the TRF. Parents and teachers run the risk of confusing behaviour and seizure features when filling out the CBCL and TRF. In "epilepsy only", prevalence estimates of psychopathology based on the CBCL and TRF, should be considered with some reserve.