Search

The analysis of the molecular structure called DNA is of particular interest for the understanding of the basic processes governing life. Correlation techniques implemented on digital computers are currentl used to do this analysis, but the process is so slow that the mapping and sequencing of the entire human genome requires a computational breakthrough. This paper presents a new method of performing the analysis of DNA sequences with an optical time-integrating correlator. The method is characterized b short processing times that make the analysis of the entire human genome a tractable enterprise. A processing strategy and the resultant processing times are presented. Experimental proofs of concept for the two types of analysis specified by the strategy are also included. Key words: DNA analysis, time-integrating correlator, optical data processing.

Abstract Background Vaccine coverage (VC) at a given age is a widely-used indicator for measuring the performance of vaccination programs. However, there is increasing data suggesting that measuring delays in administering vaccines complements the measure of VC. Providing feedback to vaccinators is recognized as an effective strategy for improving vaccine coverage, but its implementation has not been widely documented in Canada. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of providing personalized feedback to vaccinators and its impact on vaccination delays (VD). Methods In April and May 2008, a one-hour personalized feedback session was provided to health professionals in vaccinating medical clinics in the Quebec City region. VD for vaccines administered at two and twelve months of age were presented. Data from the regional vaccination registry were analysed for participating clinics. Two 12-month periods before and after the intervention were compared, namely from April 1st, 2007 to March 31st, 2008 and from June 1st, 2008 to May 31st, 2009. Results Ten medical clinics out of the twelve approached (83%), representing more than 2500 vaccinated children, participated in the project. Preparing and conducting the feedback involved 20 hours of work and expenses of $1000 per clinic. Based on a delay of one month, 94% of first doses of DTaP-Polio-Hib and 77% of meningococcal vaccine doses respected the vaccination schedule both before and after the intervention. Following the feedback, respect of the vaccination schedule increased for vaccines planned at 12 months for the four clinics that had modified their vaccination practices related to multiple injections (depending on the clinic, VD decreased by 24.4%, 32.0%, 40.2% and 44.6% respectively, p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Conclusions The present study shows that it is feasible to provide personalized feedback to vaccinating clinics. While it may have encouraged positive changes in practice concerning multiple injections, this intervention on its own did not impact vaccination delays of the clinics visited. It is possible that feedback integrated into other types of effective interventions and sustained over time may have more impact on VD.

The tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine has been indicated for pregnant women in Quebec, Canada since 2018. Recent literature suggests maternal Tdap interferes with the pneumococcal vaccine response in children exposed in utero because of maternally transferred anti-diphtheria antibodies, a phenomenon known as blunting. Using an indirect cohort study, we investigated whether maternal Tdap vaccination could alter the protection of PCV vaccines against serotype 19A/F IPD (conjugated to diphtheria toxoid in PCV10). Thirty-seven immunized IPD cases (serotype 19A/F) and 90 immunized IPD controls (non-vaccine serotypes) were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Our analyses did not identify antenatal Tdap exposure as a risk factor for IPD in vaccinated children, with and odds ratio close to the null (odds ratio = 0.82, 95%CI = 0.32-2.07). As this study is the first to assess the impact of maternal immunization on pneumococcal disease risk, future investigations involving a larger number of cases should be conducted to confirm or infirm our findings.

In the province of Quebec, Canada, a 2 + 1 dose pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) program for children was implemented in 2004. PCV7, PCV10, PCV13 and a mixed PCV10/PCV13 schedule were sequentially used without catch-up. The effectiveness of vaccination schedules to prevent serotype 19A invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in <5-year-old children was estimated by the indirect cohort method during 2009-2023. A total of 248 19A IPD cases and 457 IPD controls were included in the analysis. Adjusted vaccine effectiveness (VEa) for ≥1 dose was 57 % [95 %CI: -1 %,82 %] for PCV10 and 62 % [16 %,83 %] for PCV13. VEa for 3 doses was 69 % [17 %,88 %] for PCV10, 76 % [39 %,90 %] for PCV13 and 86 % [64 %,95 %] for the 2PCV10 + 1PCV13 schedule. Protection provided by the PCV10-only schedule tended to be of lower magnitude compared to the two other schedules. The mixed PCV10 + PCV13 schedule showed a protection against 19A IPD at least comparable to that of 3 PCV-13 doses., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The study was mainly supported by the Quebec Ministry of Health and Social Services and also by the Canadian Immunization Research Network. Sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study, collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data, and preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript. This research received no other external financial or non-financial support. All co-authors have no conflict of interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines could reduce disease burden and costs in older Canadian adults, but vaccination program cost-effectiveness is unknown. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of different age cut-offs for RSV adult vaccination programs, with or without a focus on people with higher disease risk due to chronic medical conditions., Methods: We developed a static individual-based model of medically attended RSV disease to compare alternative age-, medical risk-, and age-plus medical risk-based vaccination policies. The model followed a multiage population of 100 000 people aged 50 years and older. Vaccine characteristics were based on RSV vaccines authorized in Canada as of May 2024, with vaccine protection assumed to last 2 years (or 3 years in scenario analyses). We calculated sequential incremental cost-effectiveness ratios in 2023 Canadian dollars per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) from the health-system and societal perspectives, discounted at 1.5%., Results: Although all vaccination strategies averted medically attended RSV disease, universal age-based strategies were not an efficient use of resources compared with medical risk-based strategies. Vaccinating adults aged 70 years and older with 1 or more chronic medical condition was the optimal strategy for a cost-effectiveness threshold of $50 000 per QALY. Results were sensitive to assumptions about vaccine price, but medical risk-based approaches remained optimal compared with age-based strategies, even when vaccine prices were low. Findings were robust to a range of alternative assumptions., Interpretation: Vaccination programs for RSV in some groups of older Canadians with underlying medical conditions are likely cost-effective. These findings can inform the design of vaccination programs., Competing Interests: Competing interests:: Sarah Buchan declares funds from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and SickKids to support work on the burden of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in older adults and young children. Dr. Buchan is a member of the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) RSV Working Group and liaison member to NACI for the Canadian Association for Immunization Research, Evaluation and Education. Nicholas Brousseau is a member of NACI and the Quebec Immunization Committee. No other competing interests were declared., (© 2024 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors.)

Background: Health Canada recently authorized the RSVpreF pregnancy vaccine and nirsevimab to protect infants against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease., Objective: Assess the cost-effectiveness of RSVpreF and nirsevimab programs in preventing RSV disease in infants, compared to a palivizumab program., Methods: We used a static cohort model of a Canadian birth cohort during their first RSV season to estimate sequential incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in 2023 Canadian dollars per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for nine strategies implemented over a one-year time period, from the health system and societal perspectives. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted to explore the impact of uncertainties on the results., Results: All-infants nirsevimab programs averted more RSV-related outcomes than year-round RSVpreF programs, with the most RSV cases averted in a seasonal nirsevimab program with catch-up. Assuming list prices for these immunizing agents, all-infants nirsevimab and year-round RSVpreF programs were never cost-effective, with ICERs far exceeding commonly used cost-effectiveness thresholds. Seasonal nirsevimab with catch-up for infants born outside the RSV season was a cost-effective program if prioritized for infants at moderate/high-risk (ICER <$28,000 per QALY) or those living in settings with higher RSV burden and healthcare costs, such as remote communities where transport would be complex (ICER of $5700 per QALY). Using a $50,000 per QALY threshold, an all-infants nirsevimab program could be optimal if nirsevimab is priced at <$110-190 per dose. A year-round RSVpreF for all pregnant women and pregnant people plus nirsevimab for infants at high-risk was optimal if nirsevimab is priced at >$110-190 per dose and RSVpreF priced at <$60-125 per dose., Interpretation: Prophylactic interventions can substantially reduce RSV disease in infants, and more focused nirsevimab programs are the most cost-effective option at current product prices., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Ellen Rafferty reports a relationship with Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada that includes: funding grants. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Crown Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Measuring the ability of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies to neutralize live viruses remains an effective approach to quantify the level of protection of individuals. We assessed the neutralization activity against the ancestral SARS-CoV-2, Delta, Omicron BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 strains, in 280 vaccinated restaurant/bar, grocery and hardware store workers in Québec, Canada., Methods: Participants were recruited during the emergence of Omicron BA.1 variant. The neutralizing activity of participant sera was assessed by microneutralization assay., Results: Serum neutralizing antibody (NtAb) titers of all participants against the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain were comparable with those against Delta variant (ranges of titers 10-2032 and 10-2560, respectively), however, their response was significantly reduced against Omicron BA.1, BA2, BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 (10-1016, 10-1016, 10-320, 10-80 and 10-254, respectively). Individuals who received 2 doses of vaccine had significantly reduced NtAb titers against all SARS-CoV-2 strains compared to those infected and then vaccinated (≥1 dose), vaccinated (≥2 doses) and then infected, or those who received 3 doses of vaccine. Participants vaccinated with 2 or 3 doses of vaccine and then infected had the highest NtAb titers against all SARS-CoV-2 strains tested., Conclusion: We assessed for the first time the NtAb response in food and retail workers. We found that vaccination prior to the emergence of Omicron BA.1 was associated with higher neutralizing activity against pre-Omicron variants, suggesting the importance of updating vaccines to increase antibody response against new SARS-CoV-2 variants. Vaccination followed by infection was associated with higher neutralizing activity against all SARS-CoV-2 strains tested., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

The IgG response following infant diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP) immunization is influenced by the formulation of the infant and/or the adult vaccine (Tdap) given during pregnancy. DTaP vaccines containing either 3 (DTaP3) or 5 (DTaP5) pertussis antigens are commonly used. By conducting a secondary analysis of a large randomized controlled trial, we compared IgG levels against pertussis vaccine antigens in children of Td- and Tdap5-vaccinated mothers, after stratifying by infant vaccine formulation. After immunization with a primary series of DTaP5, but not DTaP3, IgG GMCs against pertussis antigens were significantly lower in infants of Tdap-immunized mothers compared with infants of Td-vaccinated mothers (pertussis toxin: GMC = 52.3[Tdap5] vs 83.5[Td], p < 0.001). Before and after the DTaP booster dose, IgG GMCs were similar in infants of Tdap- and Td-immunized mothers specifically when infants received the DTaP3 vaccine. The combination of the TdaP5 vaccine for mothers and the DTaP3 vaccine for children could attenuate Tdap-associated immunomodulation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Manish Sadarangani reports a relationship with GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur, Seqirus, Symvivo, VBI Vaccine that includes: funding grants. Scott A. Halperin reports a relationship with GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi-Pasteur, CanSino that includes: funding grants. Scott A. Halperin reports a relationship with GSK, Sanofi, Pfizer, AsraZeneca, Merck, and IMV that includes: board membership., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for patients undergoing cancer treatment carries a risk of severe immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). Questions remain about whether seasonal influenza vaccination might increase the risk of developing IRAEs among these patients given that vaccines are immunomodulatory. Previous vaccine safety studies on patients with cancer prescribed ICI therapy have demonstrated conflicting results., Methods: Using health administrative data from Ontario, Canada among adults diagnosed with cancer who had been prescribed ICI therapy and who had received an influenza vaccine from 2012 to 2019, we conducted a self-controlled case series study. The pre-vaccination control period started 42-days post-ICI initiation until 14-days prior to vaccination, the risk period was 1-42 days post-vaccination, and the post-vaccination control period was after the risk period until ICI discontinuation or a maximum period of two years. Emergency department (ED) visit(s) and/or hospitalization for any cause after ICI initiation was used to identify severe IRAEs. We fitted a fixed-effects Poisson regression model accounting for seasonality and calendar time to estimate relative incidence of IRAEs between risk and control periods., Results: We identified 1133 records of cancer patients who received influenza vaccination while prescribed ICI therapy. Most were aged ≥ 66 years (73 %), were male (63 %), had lung cancer (54 %), and had received ICI therapy with a programmed cell death protein 1(PD-1) inhibitor (91 %). A quarter (26 %) experienced an ED visit and/or hospitalization during the observation period. Rates of ED visits and/or hospitalizations in the risk vs. control periods were similar, with an incidence rate ratio of 1.04 (95 % CI: 0.75-1.45). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses yielded similar results., Conclusion: Seasonal influenza vaccination was not associated with an increased incidence of ED visit or hospitalization among adults with cancer treated with ICI therapy and our results support further evidence of vaccine safety., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: ‘PSB has received honoraria from Canada’s Drug and Health Technology Agency (CADTH). JR has received honoraria from Roche and consulted for Lilly, Merck, AstraZeneca and Novartis. MES has received funding from GSK for a study unrelated to influenza vaccine. AC received honoraria from Pfizer, GSK and Moderna; AC consulted for Merck, Pfizer, GSK, Moderna, Innomed and Palladin Labs; AC has received funding from GSK and Pfizer for studies unrelated to influenza vaccine. All other authors report no conflicts.’., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: During the 2022 mpox outbreak, the province of Quebec, Canada, prioritized first doses for pre-exposure vaccination of people at high mpox risk, delaying second doses due to limited supply. We estimated single-dose mpox vaccine effectiveness (VE) adjusting for virus exposure risk based only on surrogate indicators available within administrative databases (eg, clinical record of sexually transmitted infections) or supplemented by self-reported risk factor information (eg, sexual contacts)., Methods: We conducted a test-negative case-control study between 19 June and 24 September 2022. Information from administrative databases was supplemented by questionnaire collection of self-reported risk factors specific to the 3-week period before testing. Two study populations were assessed: all within the administrative databases (All-Admin) and the subset completing the questionnaire (Sub-Quest). Logistic regression models adjusted for age, calendar-time and exposure-risk, the latter based on administrative indicators only (All-Admin and Sub-Quest) or with questionnaire supplementation (Sub-Quest)., Results: There were 532 All-Admin participants, of which 199 (37%) belonged to Sub-Quest. With exposure-risk adjustment based only on administrative indicators, single-dose VE estimates were similar among All-Admin and Sub-Quest populations at 35% (95% confidence interval [CI]:-2 to 59) and 30% (95% CI:-38 to 64), respectively. With adjustment supplemented by questionnaire information, the Sub-Quest VE estimate increased to 65% (95% CI:1-87), with overlapping confidence intervals., Conclusions: Using only administrative data, we estimate one vaccine dose reduced the mpox risk by about one-third; whereas, additionally adjusting for self-reported risk factor information revealed greater vaccine benefit, with one dose instead estimated to reduce the mpox risk by about two-thirds. Inadequate exposure-risk adjustment may substantially under-estimate mpox VE., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. The authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Objective: To assess the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on COVID-19 infection and hospitalisation at the population-level, and to assess the indirect effects of vaccination in the province of Quebec, Canada., Methods: We performed a time-stratified, neighborhood-level ecologic study. The exposure was neighborhood-level vaccination (primary series) coverage; outcomes were COVID-19 infection and hospitalisation rates. We used robust Poisson regression to estimate weekly relative rates of infection and hospitalisation versus vaccination., Results: Higher vaccination coverage was associated with lower COVID-19 infection rates from July 18-December 4 for the year 2021 (Delta period) (RR≈0.46 [0.39; 0.54] - 0.94 [0.83; 1.05], 85-100% vs. 60-74% coverage). From December 5-December 25, this association reversed (RR≈1.28 [1.16; 1.41] - 1.41 [1.31; 1.52]), possibly due to the Omicron variant, social behaviors and accumulation of susceptibles in more vaccinated neighborhoods. Vaccine impact against hospitalisation was maintained throughout (RR≈0.43 [0.29; 0.65] - 0.88 [0.64; 1.22]). Vaccination provided substantial indirect protection (RR≈0.43 [0.34; 0.54] - 0.81 [0.65; 1.03])., Conclusions: This study confirmed the protective impact of vaccination against severe disease regardless of variant, at the population level. Ecological analyses are a valuable strategy to evaluate vaccination programs. Population-level effects can have substantial effects and should be accounted for in public health and vaccination program planning., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Passive immunization products for infants and pregnant women and people have sparked interest in understanding Canada's respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) burden. This rapid review examines RSV burden of disease in infants, young children and pregnant women and people., Methods: Electronic databases were searched to identify studies and systematic reviews reporting data on outpatient visits, hospitalizations, intensive care unit admissions, deaths and preterm labour associated with RSV. We also contacted Canadian respiratory virus surveillance experts for additional data., Results: Overall, 17 studies on infants and young children and 10 studies on pregnant women and people were included, in addition to primary surveillance data from one Canadian territory (Yukon). There were higher rates of medical utilization for infants than older children. Hospitalization rates were highest in infants under six months (more than 1% annually), with 5% needing intensive care unit admission, but mortality was low. Severe outcomes often occurred in healthy full-term infants and burden was higher than influenza. Respiratory syncytial virus attack rate was 10%-13% among pregnant women and people. Only one study found a higher hospitalization rate in pregnant women and people compared to non-pregnant women and people. Limited evidence was found on intensive care unit admission, death and preterm birth for pregnant women and people., Conclusion: While risk of severe outcomes is larger in high-risk infants and children, healthcare burden is greatest in healthy term infants. The RSV severity for pregnant women and people appears to be similar to that for non-pregnant women and people., Competing Interests: Competing interests None.

Medical mistrust is fueled by conspiracy theories and histories of healthcare systems abuse and is a known determinant of health outcomes in minority populations. Plagued by multiple and pervasive conspiracy theories, HIV/AIDS has proven to be particularly hampered by medical mistrust. The current paper systematically reviews the literature on medical mistrust among people at risk for or living with HIV infection. The bulk of evidence from 17 studies supports medical mistrust as a barrier to HIV testing, engagement in prevention and care services, treatment uptake and adherence, and clinical outcomes. While findings mostly indicate that medical mistrust is a barrier to HIV prevention and care, some studies report null results and others suggest that medical mistrust may actually improve some HIV-related outcomes. Additionally, most of the reviewed literature was cross-sectional. Thus longitudinal, theory-driven research is needed to reconcile inconsistent findings and determine long term outcomes of medical mistrust. Interventions may then be developed to reduce the negative consequences associated with medical mistrust., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: In 2019, the 3 + 1 schedule for children's vaccination (2-4-6-18 months old) was changed for a reduced 2 + 1 schedule (2-4-12 months old) in Quebec, Canada. We compared the post-booster anti-pertussis and anti-pneumococcus IgG antibody concentrations among children of Tdap-vaccinated and unvaccinated mothers for different vaccine schedules and vaccine formulations., Methods: We conducted an observational cohort study. An invitation letter to potential participants was provided during a routine vaccination visit. Children's blood samples were analyzed post-booster at 13 (2 + 1 schedule) or 19 (3 + 1 schedule) months of age for antibodies against pertussis antigens (pertussis toxin (PT), filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) and pertactin (PRN)) and pneumococcal antigens (serotypes 4, 18C, 19A, and 19F). IgG concentrations among children of Tdap-vaccinated and unvaccinated mothers for each vaccination schedule were compared using geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and GMC ratios (GMRs), adjusting for potentially immune-response-influencing factors (aGMR). Serotype-specific pneumococcal seroprotection rates were also compared., Results: A total of 360 children were included for pertussis analysis and 248 for pneumococcal analysis. For the 2 + 1 schedule, 13-month-old children of Tdap-vaccinated mothers had lower GMCs against PT, FHA, and PRN, with aGMR (95 %CI) of 0.77 (0.65-0.90), 0.66 (0.55-0.79), 0.72 (0.52-0.99), respectively. For the 3 + 1 schedule, at 19 months old, the interference appeared to be attenuated (higher aGMR values). GMCs against PT were slightly higher in the 3 + 1 than the 2 + 1 schedule: 126.5 IU/ml vs 91.6 IU/ml; aGMR = 1.27. GMCs against PT, FHA and PRN were slightly higher among children who received Infanrix hexa® compared to those who received Pediacel® at 12 months old. For pneumococcal antibodies, at 13 months old, there was no strong evidence of immune interference in children of Tdap-vaccinated mothers., Conclusion: Infant vaccination schedule may influence immune interference associated with maternal Tdap vaccination. More studies are needed to assess the clinical impact of this interference on children's protection., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Manish Sadarangani has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur, Seqirus, Symvivo and VBI Vaccines; all funds have been paid to his institute, and he has not received any personal payments. Marina Ulanova received an investigator-initiated research grant from Pfizer with all funds paid to her University; she has also received honoraria for serving on the advisory boards and travel expenses from Pfizer. Scott Halperin has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi-Pasteur, and CanSino; all funds have been paid to his University. SH has also served on ad hoc advisory boards for GSK, Sanofi, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Merck, and Novavax., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)