Search

BACKGROUND: Textbook outcomes are composite outcome measures that reflect the ideal overall experience for patients. There are many of these in the elective surgery literature but no textbook outcomes have been proposed for patients following emergency laparotomy. The aim was to achieve international consensus amongst experts and patients for the best Textbook Outcomes for non-trauma and trauma emergency laparotomy. METHODS: A modified Delphi exercise was undertaken with three planned rounds to achieve consensus regarding the best Textbook Outcomes based on the category, number and importance (Likert scale of 1-5) of individual outcome measures. There were separate questions for non-trauma and trauma. A patient engagement exercise was undertaken after round 2 to inform the final round. RESULTS: A total of 337 participants from 53 countries participated in all three rounds of the exercise. The final Textbook Outcomes were divided into early and longer-term. For non-trauma patients the proposed early Textbook Outcome was Discharged from hospital without serious postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade III; including intra-abdominal sepsis, organ failure, unplanned re-operation or death). For trauma patients it was Discharged from hospital without unexpected transfusion after haemostasis, and no serious postoperative complications (adapted Clavien-Dindo for trauma ≥ grade III; including intra-abdominal sepsis, organ failure, unplanned re-operation on or death). The longer-term Textbook Outcome for both non-trauma and trauma was Achieved the early Textbook Outcome, and restoration of baseline quality of life at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Early and longer-term Textbook Outcomes have been agreed by an international consensus of experts for non-trauma and trauma emergency laparotomy. These now require clinical validation with patient data.

Background: Major trauma is a leading cause of death and disability in younger individuals and poses a significant public health concern. There is a growing interest in understanding the complex relationships between socioeconomic deprivation and major trauma. Anecdotal evidence suggests that deprivation is associated with more violent and debilitating injuries. There remains a paucity in literature evaluating major trauma outcomes in relation to socioeconomic deprivation. Methods: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases was performed to identify studies from 1947 to March 2024. The primary outcome was to establish the distribution of injuries based on deprivation, with secondary outcomes evaluating surgical intervention rates, length of stay, and mortality. Quantitative pooling of data was based on the random‐effects model. Results: Fourteen studies and 878,872 trauma patients were included. A substantial proportion (28%) of trauma incidents occurred in the most deprived group. Patients from the lowest socioeconomic group were considerably younger (weighted mean difference [WMD] −9.85 years and 95% confidence intervals [CI] −9.99 to −9.70) and more likely to be male (odds ratio [OR] 1.36 and 95% CI 1.14–1.63). There were no differences in surgical intervention (OR 1.74 and 95% CI 0.97–3.13), length of stay (WMD 1.15 days and 95% CI −0.32−2.62), and mortality (OR 1.04 and 95% CI 0.95–1.14) regardless of background. Conclusion: Major trauma is prevalent in deprived areas and in younger individuals, with an increasing trend of deprivation in male patients. Although the rates of surgery, length of stay, and mortality did not differ between groups, planning of public health interventions should target areas of higher deprivation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: There remains a significant morbidity and mortality in young pedestrians hit by motor vehicles, even in the era of pedestrian crossings and speed limits. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence and injury severity of motor vehicle-related pedestrian trauma according to time of day and season in a young population, based on the supposition that injuries would be more prevalent during dusk and dawn and during autumn and winter. Methods: Data were retrieved from the National Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) database for patients between 10 and 25 years old who had been involved as pedestrians in road traffic collisions between 2013 and 2020. The incidence of injuries, their severity (using the injury severity score (ISS)) and mortality were analysed according to the hours of daylight, darkness and season. Results: The study identified a seasonal pattern, highlighting that injuries were most prevalent during autumn (34.9% of injuries). Prevalence decreased throughout the year from winter (25.4%) to spring (21.4%), to summer (18.3%). The greatest incident rate (number of incidents/hour) occurred between 1500-1630 h, correlating to school pick up times, but overall there was no significant difference in injury prevalence between hours of darkness (47.3%) and daylight (52.7%). However, a significant relationship between ISS and daylight hours was demonstrated (p-value = 0.0124), whereby moderate injuries (ISS score: 9-15) were more likely during the day (72.7%), while severe injuries (ISS score > 15) were more likely at night (55.8%). Conclusion:We identified a relationship between the time of day and the frequency and severity of pedestrian trauma in young people. In addition, particular time groupings correspond to the greatest incidents rate, suggesting that reduced visibility coupled with school pick up times play a significant role. We recommend targeted public health measures to improve road safety that focus on these high-risk times of the day. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]