Search

Individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) experience vaso-occlusive crises (VOC). Historically, VOC episodes have been assessed through medical utilization, thereby excluding events managed at home. In order to validate a daily patient-reported outcome for patients with SCD to accurately report their VOC status and experience of a pain crisis, a SCD Diary was included in Evaluation of Longitudinal Pain Study in Sickle Cell Disease (ELIPSIS), a longitudinal, six-month, non-interventional study. The daily patient-completed diary included a description of SCD pain crisis, followed by questions on: pain crisis in the past 24 h (VOC Day question; respective response yes or no), worst pain, tiredness, and functioning. Thirty-five patients with SCD participated in ELIPSIS. Analyses were performed to validate the patient-reported VOC Day. Mean symptoms and functioning scores on the first or last VOC Day of a VOC Event were compared using t-tests with the mean of the three non-VOC Days before and after the event. Mean severity of symptoms and functioning scores on all VOC Days compared to all non-VOC Days were higher, with statistically significant mean differences between first/last VOC Days and respective three non-VOC Days (p's .01). A subset of patients (n = 15) and caregivers (n = 9) were interviewed to evaluate their understanding of the SCD Diary questions. Nearly all confirmed that the pain crisis description accurately described the VOC experience, and participants expressed confidence differentiating SCD crisis pain from everyday pain. These results demonstrate patients can reliably report their experiences with VOC-related pain crises using the SCD Diary.

The Prescription Opioid Misuse and Abuse Questionnaire (POMAQ) was developed to identify prescription opioid misuse and abuse among patients with chronic pain. A clinical scoring algorithm was developed and refined to align with the patient experience. This study utilized data from the POMAQ validation study (3033-4, NCT02660606) conducted on a sample of patients with chronic pain living in the United States. The study was carried out in two phases. Two purposefully enriched patient samples, one for each phase, were created based on patient responses to select POMAQ items and the availability of urine and hair samples. Two clinical experts (SHS, SFB) reviewed patient data to classify prescription opioid use behavior. Classification differences were adjudicated by a third clinical expert (JTF). Comparisons were made between the final clinical classification determined by the experts and the proposed classification based on the POMAQ algorithm. Sixty patients were included in Phase I (only POMAQ data) and 52 in Phase II (including POMAQ and ancillary sources [e.g. electronic medical records, urine toxicity screen]). Refinements were made to the POMAQ scoring algorithm following discussions with clinical experts to ensure it was clinically relevant. For both phases, classifications were reviewed and discussed to achieve maximal concordance of classifications across experts. The proposed scoring algorithm was then modified to maximize agreement with the expert interpretation of clinically relevant patient experiences. The clinical scoring algorithm for the POMAQ was developed and refined to reflect clinically relevant patient behaviors identified by expert review. Future testing is needed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of this measure.

In recent decades, the dramatic rise of obesity among youth in the US has been accompanied by a rise in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in this population. This alarming trend underscores the importance of conducting trials to evaluate new therapies in children with T2D. A targeted review of peer-reviewed literature and trials registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov was conducted in January 2021 to identify pharmaceutical interventional studies in youth with T2D. Information regarding enrollment data, study design elements, subjects’ baseline characteristics, and key treatment outcomes was documented. Among the 16 clinical studies included in this review, only five appeared to meet projected enrollment targets in < 4 years. Although three other studies met recruitment targets, two took approximately 5 years to complete and the third took nearly 10 years. Despite legislation requiring evaluation of pharmaceutical treatments in pediatric populations, surprisingly few interventional studies have been conducted in children with T2D. This review highlights that recruitment challenges may be impeding the conduct and completion of interventional studies. Consequently, few pharmaceutical treatments have been proven to be effective and approved for children with T2D. Metformin and liraglutide remain the only non-insulin treatments formally approved in the US for use in this population. More clinical research is needed to support regulatory decision-making as well as treatment decisions for children with T2D in clinical settings. Sponsors and investigators will need to implement strategies for improving trial enrollment as well as work with regulatory agencies to develop novel study designs that may require fewer patients.

A chronic pain patient sample living in the United States who participated in a cross-sectional study to evaluate the validity and reproducibility of the Prescription Opioid Misuse and Abuse Questionnaire is characterized.Patients with chronic pain identified through electronic medical records as refilling at least one opioid prescription within the prior 3 months were recruited from five United States Department of Defense Military Health System clinics. Patients completed the Prescription Opioid Misuse and Abuse Questionnaire, Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form, Medical Outcomes Study: 36-item Short Form, and sociodemographic questions online. Clinical characteristics and electronic medical records for 1 year prior to consent were collected.809 (86.2%) participants completed the Prescription Opioid Misuse and Abuse Questionnaire. Mean (± standard deviation) age was 55.4 ± 12.7 years; the majority female (55.5%) and white (74.8%). Mean duration of chronic pain was 14.7 ± 10.5 years; the most common pain conditions were lower back pain (76.6%), neck or shoulder pain (60.3%), and osteoarthritis (38.7%). The most commonly prescribed opioids were oxycodone (35.7%), tramadol (34.5%), and hydrocodone (26.9%); 54.8% took one opioid, 44.9% took 2 or more opioids.Participants' health status was poor; pain severity and interference were moderate. Electronic medical record data revealed high healthcare resource utilization. This chronic pain population was severely impacted by their pain condition(s).

The Prescription Opioid Misuse and Abuse Questionnaire was developed to identify prescription opioid abuse and misuse among patients with chronic pain, however evidence of construct validity and reproducibility is needed. Chronic pain patients were recruited from five Department of Defense Military Health System clinics across the United States. Construct validity was examined using subjective clinician-reported and patient-reported measures as well as objective information (e.g., hair/urine drug screens and electronic medical records). Test-retest reliability was assessed across 2-time points among a subgroup of patients with stable chronic pain. Of 3,263 screened patients, 938 (28.7%) met eligibility and were enrolled; 809 (86.2%) completed the Prescription Opioid Misuse and Abuse Questionnaire. Construct validity was supported by comparison to other validated questionnaires and hair and urine screens which yielded high agreements with patient reports on the Prescription Opioid Misuse and Abuse Questionnaire. Electronic medical record data supported patients’ Prescription Opioid Misuse and Abuse Questionnaire responses regarding physician and emergency room visits and opioid refills. The Prescription Opioid Misuse and Abuse Questionnaire had excellent test-retest reliability; the percentage agreement between the two Prescription Opioid Misuse and Abuse Questionnaire administrations was high (>90%) for most questions. Results suggest that the Prescription Opioid Misuse and Abuse Questionnaire is a valid and reproducible tool that can be used to assess the presence of prescription opioid misuse and abuse among patients with chronic pain.

Introduction The Diabetes Injection Device Preference Questionnaire (DID-PQ) was designed to assess patient preference between two non-insulin injection devices. In a recent crossover study, people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) completed the DID-PQ after performing mock injections with two non-insulin injection devices. The purpose of the current analysis was to use these data to assess construct validity of the DID-PQ and demonstrate one way to test whether there is a significant preference for one injection device over another. Methods Data were from an open-label, multicenter, randomized, crossover study assessing preference between the dulaglutide and semaglutide injection pens. In addition to the 10-item DID-PQ, people with T2D completed a global item assessing overall preference. DID-PQ responses were compared to the global preference item (percent agreement, Gwet’s AC1, prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted Kappa [PABAK]). For each item of the DID-PQ, a two-sided binomial test assessed whether the difference in preference was statistically significant. Results The sample included 310 participants (48.4% female; mean age = 60.0). The DID-PQ had minimal missing data. There was strong concordance (percent agreement > 78%) between the global preference item and all DID-PQ items except item 6, which assesses preference related to needle size (59.7%). The Gwet AC1 and PABAK statistics also indicated strong agreement between the global preference item and all DID-PQ items except item 6. There was a statistically significant difference (p Discussion Patient preference has been recommended as a “major factor driving the choice of medication” in a consensus report by the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Current findings suggest that the DID-PQ may be a useful tool for providing insight into preferences of people with T2D using non-insulin injectable medication.

Aim When selecting treatments for type 2 diabetes (T2D), it is important to consider not only efficacy and safety, but also other treatment attributes that have an impact on patient preference. The objective of this study was to examine preference between injection devices used for two weekly GLP‐1 receptor agonists. Materials and Methods The PREFER study was an open‐label, multicentre, randomized, crossover study assessing patient preference for dulaglutide and semaglutide injection devices among injection‐naïve patients receiving oral medication for type 2 diabetes. After being trained to use each device, participants performed all steps of injection preparation and administered mock injections into an injection pad. Time‐to‐train (TTT) for each device was assessed in a subset. Results There were 310 evaluable participants (48.4% female; mean age, 60.0 years; 78 participants in the TTT subgroup). More participants preferred the dulaglutide device than the semaglutide device (84.2% vs. 12.3%; P

Background To evaluate the psychometric characteristics of the 1-month recall Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire (UFS-QOL), including the Revised Activities subscale. Methods VENUS I and II were phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of ulipristal acetate in women with uterine fibroids (UF) and abnormal uterine bleeding. Women completed the 1-month recall UFS-QOL at baseline and after 12 weeks’ treatment. Uterine bleeding was assessed via a daily diary (both studies); the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale (PGI-I) was completed in VENUS II. Psychometric analyses examined internal consistency reliability and construct validity of the UFS-QOL; confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) compared model fit of the original and Revised Activities subscales. Analyses were conducted separately for VENUS I and II. Results One hundred and fifty-seven patients in VENUS I and 429 in VENUS II were included. Changes in mean Symptom Severity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scale scores indicated symptom burden reductions and HRQoL improvements. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were high at baseline and after 12 weeks’ treatment (all ≥0.76, meeting the >0.70 threshold), demonstrating strong internal consistency reliability. Correlations between UFS-QOL scores and bleeding diary responses (range: −0.35 to −0.63), and UFS-QOL scores and PGI-I responses (range: −0.48 to −0.70), ranged from moderate to strong after 12 weeks’ treatment (all p

Background: Pruritus is a prevalent and bothersome symptom of scalp psoriasis. Validated scales assessing scalp itch are needed to evaluate treatment efficacy.Objective: To evaluate comprehensibili...

Background Sarcoidosis-associated pulmonary hypertension (SAPH) is a prevalent and serious complication of sarcoidosis. No SAPH-specific self-report instruments for assessing SAPH symptoms and their impact on patients are available to date. This study sought to determine whether the Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact (PAH-SYMPACT™) questionnaire is suitable for use in patients with SAPH. Methods Patients diagnosed with SAPH participated in qualitative one-on-one telephone interviews to better understand SAPH symptoms and their impacts on patients’ lives and to determine the appropriateness of the PAH-SYMPACT™ for use in patients with SAPH. The interviews comprised concept elicitation, completion of the PAH-SYMPACT™, and cognitive debriefing. Interview transcripts were analyzed by content analysis. Results Eleven patients with SAPH were interviewed between August 2019 and June 2020. In the concept elicitation, all 11 participants endorsed shortness of breath and nine participants (82%) rated it as their “most bothersome or severe” symptom. Impacts endorsed by all 11 participants were difficulty walking uphill or up stairs and difficulty in performing daily activities. Cognitive debriefing indicated that the PAH-SYMPACT™ items were relevant and understandable to most participants and reflected their experiences of SAPH. Participants indicated that no key symptoms or impacts of SAPH were missing. They also reported that the PAH-SYMPACT™ instructions and response options were clear, and that it would be feasible to complete the 11 symptom items and one oxygen use item as part of their daily schedule. Conclusions This study suggests the PAH-SYMPACT™ is suitable for assessing symptoms and their impact in patients with SAPH. However, larger longitudinal studies are needed to confirm that it is fit for use in this patient population and that it can be used to reliably detect temporal changes in patients’ symptom status. Trial registration Not applicable.

Introduction The administration of medications targeting type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) has evolved over time. As injection delivery systems continue to evolve, it is necessary to understand patients’ perceptions of currently available treatments. The objective of this study was to examine the patient perspective of injectable treatment for T2D and identify characteristics of these treatments that are most important to patients. Methods Data were collected via an online survey study with a sample of individuals in the UK and US who were treated for T2D with injectable medication. The survey was designed to elicit perceptions of the treatment process for injectable glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and insulin. Results The sample included 504 participants (251 UK, 253 US). Approximately half (50.4%) were treated with a GLP-1 receptor agonist and half (49.6%) were treated with insulin. Respondents were presented with a list of 17 characteristics of injectable medication and asked to indicate which were most important to them. Respondents most frequently selected confidence in administering the correct dose (n = 300, 59.5%); ease of selecting the correct dose (n = 268, 53.2%); overall ease of using the injection device (n = 239, 47.4%); frequency of injections (n = 223, 44.2%); and ease of carrying the device when necessary to inject away from home (n = 190, 37.7%). Characteristics least frequently cited as important included dose escalation (n = 79, 15.7%); handling the needle (n = 74, 14.7%); connectivity to an electronic device (n = 70, 13.9%); and the time required to prepare and inject each dose (n = 62, 12.3%). Conclusion Results of this survey suggest that patients prioritize some attributes of injectable treatments over others. These findings may have implications for clinical practice and development of injection devices. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-021-01097-9.

Background Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare form of pulmonary hypertension caused by blood clots and scar tissue in the blood vessels of the lungs. Health-related quality of life is often significantly impaired in patients with CTEPH. However, a better understanding of how CTEPH symptoms affect patients’ lives is needed to optimally assess the impact of the disease and treatment. Objectives This qualitative study aimed to better understand the symptoms of CTEPH and how they affect patients’ lives, as well as to determine the appropriateness of the Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension – Symptoms and Impact (PAH-SYMPACT™) questionnaire for use in this patient population. Methods Adults diagnosed with CTEPH, recruited from two clinical sites in the US, participated in one-to-one qualitative telephone interviews. They described their experience of CTEPH symptoms and the impact these symptoms have on their lives. They also provided feedback on the comprehensibility and relevance of the PAH-SYMPACT™‘s instructions, items, and response options. Results Participants (N = 12) had a mean age of 62.5 years. Two thirds were female and most (83%) had undergone pulmonary endarterectomy and/or balloon pulmonary angioplasty. The most frequently endorsed symptoms were shortness of breath (endorsed by all 12 participants), fatigue (11 participants), and lightheadedness (10 participants). All participants identified shortness of breath as an “extremely important” symptom, and seven participants rated fatigue as “extremely important.” The most frequent impacts of CTEPH were on ability to walk quickly (endorsed by all 12 participants), ability to walk up inclines or stairs (11 participants), and ability to carry things (11 participants). The PAH-SYMPACT™ items were relevant to most participants and reflected their experience of CTEPH. All participants indicated that no important CTEPH symptoms were missing from the PAH-SYMPACT™. Overall, the instructions, items, and response options of the PAH-SYMPACT™ were clear and easy to understand. Conclusions The symptoms and impacts experienced by patients with CTEPH align with items included in the PAH-SYMPACT™. The PAH-SYMPACT™ appears to be fit for purpose for assessing disease status in patients with CTEPH.

The Chronic Pain Questions (CPQ) were developed for clinical use with the aim of supporting primary care physicians in the screening, assessment and monitoring of patients with chronic pain. the purpose of this study was to examine the ability of the cpq CPQ to discriminate between patients with neuropathic pain (nep) versus those with sensory hypersensitivity (sh).Adult men and women with a diagnosis of a NeP or SH condition were recruited from 5 clinical sites across the United States. Participants completed a series of self-administered questionnaires, including the CPQ. Continuous variables were compared between groups with independent t-tests; categorical variables were compared with chi-square analyses. A series of exploratory logistic regressions were performed to discern optimal screening criteria for SH using CPQ responses.98 participants, 68 with physician-confirmed diagnoses of SH and 30 with NeP, participated. 81.6% were female, 73.5% Caucasian, and mean (± SD) age was 58.4 ± 12.6 years. SH participants included significantly more females compared to the NeP group (94.1% vs. 53.3%). Differences in CPQ responses between groups were statistically significant for six of the 14 CPQ items with SH participants having significantly lower scores on specific pain quality questions and significantly higher scores on trouble thinking/remembering (5.3 ± 3.5 vs. 3.0 ± 2.8) and sensitivity to lights/noises/smells (4.8 ± 3.5 vs. 2.7 ± 3.0). No significant differences were found between groups for chronic pain intensity, pain made worse with touch, pain limited to joints, or pain interference with usual activity, sleep or mood. Logistic regression analyses revealed strong c indices (≥0.89) for all models. Consistent findings demonstrated that younger age, female gender, and scores ≥6 for the CPQ question on sensitivity to lights/noises/smells were all predictive of SH.The CPQ can help differentiate between patients with NeP and SH. More research is warranted.

Collecting data that helps evaluate different types of pain may improve physicians' decision-making with regard to treatment selection and on-going monitoring of patients. To date, no chronic pain assessments have been widely implemented in primary care. The aim of this study was to psychometrically validate the electronic Chronic Pain Questions (eCPQ) in a primary care setting.All men and women ≥18 years arriving at two similar primary care clinics in southeastern Michigan were invited to participate. Clinic staff verbally administered the eCPQ to patients and recorded their answers into the electronic medical record (EMR) prior to physician consultation with results available for physician review. Concurrent validity was assessed using Spearman correlations between eCPQ and patient-completed ancillary measures. Known-group validity was assessed by stratifying patients on self-reported chronic pain as well as by pain diagnosis (i.e. ICD-9 codes). To compare patients with chronic pain versus no chronic pain t-tests and chi-square tests were performed. Reproducibility was assessed between interviewer- and self-administration over time.A total of 534 patients were invited to participate and 455 patients consented to take part in the study (85.2% response rate); 395 patients had analyzable eCPQ data; 70.1% were Caucasian; 68.1% female; mean age was 43.4; 52.7% (n = 208) self-reported chronic pain. Correlations between eCPQ and ancillary measures supported concurrent validity. Excellent discrimination between groups was evidenced based on self-reported chronic pain and ICD-9 diagnosis. Patients with self-reported chronic pain reported significantly (p .0001) higher pain ratings and greater interference with usual activities, sleep, and mood than those without chronic pain. Test-retest reliability between modes (interviewer- vs. self-administration) was excellent as was reproducibility based on self-administration of the eCPQ at two separate time points. Key limitations: Discriminant validity was determined by comparing participants based on ICD codes. Utilizing ICD codes to identify individuals with chronic pain may not be a reliable approach as it is dependent upon providers accurately and consistently entering chronic pain diagnoses in the EMR.The eCPQ has sound psychometric measurement properties, including concurrent validity, discriminant validity, and reproducibility. The eCPQ appears to be useful to identify patients with chronic pain and to assess and monitor symptoms over time.

Introduction: Individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) experience vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs) - acute episodes of severe pain caused by vaso-occlusion. Vaso-occlusion typically causes complications, including ischemic damage to tissues resulting organ failure (Piel 2017). Historically, VOC events were assessed only through medical utilization, thereby excluding events managed by patients strictly at home. Thus, many VOC events are never recorded in the medical system, and the treatment benefit of new SCD therapies may be underestimated when relying on medical utilization alone. Objective: The goal was to develop and validate a daily diary for patients with SCD to accurately report their VOC status. Methods: A pilot patient diary was developed from qualitative interviews with patients with SCD and their caregivers and implemented as an electronic daily diary (eDiary) in a longitudinal, 6-month, non-interventional Phase 0 study of pain biomarkers in adolescents and adults (ELIPSIS Study; Callaghan et al 2017). The eDiary included a description of SCD pain crisis, which was followed by questions on: 1) pain crisis in the past 24 hours (ie, VOC Day question); 2) worst pain; 3) tiredness; and, 4) ability to perform usual physical activities. If a patient responded "yes" to the VOC Day question, they were asked how they treated their pain (eg, emergency room, hospitalized, called or visited doctor, treated self at home). Interviews were conducted among patients and caregivers in ELIPSIS to evaluate their understanding of the eDiary. All face-to-face interviews followed a semi-structured interview guide, were audio-recorded, and transcribed. Qualitative interview data were analyzed using content analysis. Quantitative analyses were conducted using the ELIPSIS data. A VOC Day was recorded when a patient responded "yes" to the VOC Day question. A VOC event was a sequence of VOC Days that could also include single intervening days with no reported pain crisis. Each VOC event was classified by the highest level of treatment received during the event. Psychometric analysis of the ELIPSIS data was performed to validate the VOC Day concept. Mean symptoms and activities scores on the first or last VOC Day of an event were compared using t-tests with the mean of the 3 non-VOC days: 1) prior to the first reported VOC Day of an event, or 2) following the event to examine each score's sensitivity to change in patient VOC status. Results: Thirty-five patients with SCD (mean [± SD] age 24.7 [± 9.5] years) participated in ELIPSIS; 51.4% were female. A majority (62.3%) of VOC events in ELIPSIS were treated at home, while 18.4% culminated in a hospitalization, 17.5% resulted in direct healthcare utilization, and the remaining patients (1.8%) had indirect healthcare utilization. Thirty-one patients reported ≥ 1 VOC Day. The mean number of VOC Days per patient was 11.2 ± 19.3 (1.0-91.0), and mean duration of VOC events was 2.7 ± 3.3 days (1.0-14.7). Mean severity of symptoms and activities scores on all VOC Days compared to all non-VOC Days were higher (worst pain: 7.6 vs. 2.6; tiredness: 6.3 vs. 4.1; usual physical activities: 3.6 vs. 2.6), with significant mean differences between first/last VOC Days and respective 3 non-VOC Days (all p Fifteen SCD patients and 9 caregivers completed an interview following ELIPSIS. Nearly all (93% of patients; 89% of caregivers) confirmed that the eDiary definition of pain crisis accurately described the experience of a SCD pain crisis, and participants expressed confidence in differentiating SCD crisis pain from everyday pain. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that patients can reliably report their experiences with VOC-related pain crises on an eDiary by responding to the VOC Day question. Qualitative data demonstrated that ELIPSIS patients: 1) differentiated between everyday pain and SCD crisis pain, and 2) endorsed the SCD pain crisis description included in the eDiary. The high proportion of patient-reported VOC events treated at home indicates that relying on operational VOC definitions requiring medical utilization results in a substantial number of missed VOC events. By broadening the VOC definition to include patient-reported, non-medical utilization VOC events, future studies can evaluate the impact of new therapies and their efficacy in reducing VOC events. The daily VOC Day question is a critical tool for capturing the VOC experience of patients with SCD. Disclosures Coyne: Evidera: Current Employment; Pfizer: Consultancy. Currie:Evidera: Current Employment; Pfizer: Consultancy. Callaghan:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Site Investigator/sub-I Clinical Trial, Research Funding; Alnylum: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biomarin: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Site Investigator/sub-I Clinical Trial, Speakers Bureau; Sancillio: Other; Hema Biologics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NovoNordisk: Other, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Global Blood Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Speakers Bureau; Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spark: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche/Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Site Investigator/sub-I Clinical Trial, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Wyrwich:Pfizer: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Pease:Pfizer: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Baker:Pfizer: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Arkin:Pfizer: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: own stock/options in the company. Pittman:Pfizer: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

Background Previous research has examined patient perceptions of insulin injection devices. However, a range of injectable medications other than insulin are now used to treat type 2 diabetes. No patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments have been developed taking into account the perceptions of patients using newer injection devices, which are often different from those used in the past. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study was to evaluate a new PRO instrument focusing on patients’ experiences with injection devices, including those used for newer treatments such as GLP-1 receptor agonists. Methods Patients with T2D treated with non-insulin injectable medications were recruited via advertisements and six clinical sites in the US. All participants completed the draft Diabetes Injection Device - Experience Questionnaire (DID-EQ) and additional measures administered for validity assessment. Participants who had experience with two non-insulin injection devices also completed the draft Diabetes Injection Device - Preference Questionnaire (DID-PQ). Analyses focused on item reduction (item performance, exploratory factor analysis), reliability, and validity. Results One hundred fourty two patients (mean age = 63.0y; 56.3% female) participated. Item reduction yielded a 10-item version of the DID-EQ, including a 7-item Device Characteristics subscale and three global items assessing satisfaction, ease of use, and convenience of the injection device. The DID-EQ demonstrated good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha of Device Characteristics subscale = 0.80) and 7-day test-retest reliability (ICCs: 0.92 for Device Characteristics subscale; 0.65 to 0.91 for the three global items). Construct validity was demonstrated via correlations with previously validated instruments (e.g., correlations with the DTSQ treatment satisfaction subscale ranged from 0.56 to 0.60, all p

Liraglutide and dulaglutide have demonstrated similar glycemic efficacy and safety. However, they differ in treatment administration and injection devices. The purpose of this study was to examine and compare patient perceptions of the injection devices used with liraglutide and dulaglutide.Patients with type 2 diabetes treated with liraglutide or dulaglutide were recruited from across the US. Patients completed the Diabetes Injection Device Experience Questionnaire (DID-EQ) to rate their current injection device. Patients who had experience with both treatments also completed the Diabetes Injection Device Preference Questionnaire (DID-PQ) to report preferences between the two devices. ANCOVAs were conducted to compare DID-EQ scores between dulaglutide and liraglutide patients, while controlling for covariates. Descriptive statistics are presented for preferences reported on the DID-PQ.A total of 404 patients were recruited from 49 states (mean age = 60.7 years; 54.0% female; 204 liraglutide; 200 dulaglutide). Mean DID-EQ item scores for both treatments were high, ranging from 3.48 to 3.90 on a 4 point scale. ANCOVAs found significantly higher scores for dulaglutide than liraglutide on DID-EQ global items assessing ease of use (3.82 vs. 3.73, p = .040) and convenience (3.79 vs. 3.66, p = .004). Among the 58 patients who had used both devices, more patients reported a preference for the dulaglutide device than the liraglutide device on every item of the DID-PQ.High DID-EQ scores indicate positive perceptions of both the liraglutide and dulaglutide injection devices. The dulaglutide device was associated with slightly higher scores for ease of use and convenience than the liraglutide device.

Many patients with chronic opioid-induced constipation (OIC) seek treatment to relieve their symptoms. A symptom screener may be useful in identifying symptomatic OIC patients. The aims of this study were to assess patient understanding of Stool Symptom Screener content and to evaluate how patients described their constipation experience, to better understand the relationship between constipation symptoms and patterns of laxative use. Adult OIC patients were recruited through five clinical sites across the USA. Patients were classified as either frequent or non-frequent laxative users. Patients participated in a semi-structured interview to assess their understanding of a Stool Symptom Screener and to discuss their constipation symptoms and laxative use experience. Interview transcripts were reviewed using content analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the sample. Sixty-six OIC patients participated: 39 frequent laxative users (mean age 53.3 years) and 27 non-frequent laxative users (mean age 55.5 years). Both patient groups described high levels of symptom burden on the Stool Symptom Screener as well as anecdotally. Both patient groups generally understood the Stool Symptom Screener items and felt the questions were relevant to their symptom experience. Most (95.5 %) reported that they could remember their constipation symptoms “easily” over the previous 2 weeks. No qualitative differences were found between frequent and non-frequent laxative users in how they described their OIC symptom experience. OIC patients understood this Stool Symptom Screener, and its content was relevant to this highly symptomatic patient sample. Pain and bloating may be considered as additional symptoms for future versions of the screener. An emerging conceptual model of the OIC experience, laxative use, and symptoms is presented.

Introduction In order to reliably assess treatment effectiveness, patient-reported outcome instruments must demonstrate adequate psychometric properties. Aim To assess the responsiveness of the Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ) using data from two Phase 3 trials of collagenase clostridium histolyticum for Peyronie's disease (PD). Methods Both trials recruited adult males with PD who were in a stable relationship with a female partner for at least 3 months. Patients completed the PDQ, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and a global assessment of PD (GAPD) questionnaire at baseline and Weeks 24 and 52. Anchor- and distribution-based methods were used to evaluate the responsiveness of the PDQ. Main Outcome Measure Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire. Results The number of men available with baseline and Week 52 data was 267 for Study 1 and 270 for Study 2. The mean age was 58.0 for Study 1 and 57.4 for Study 2; the majority were white (95.2% and 97.3%, respectively). Mean PDQ subscale change scores from baseline to Week 52 for both studies ranged from −1.5 to −4.6 (P < 0.0001). In Study 1, effect sizes were moderate to large on the Psychological and Physical Symptoms (−0.56) and Symptom Bother subscales (−0.84). For patients with penile pain at baseline, the effect size was large (−1.05) for the Penile Pain subscale. Similar effect sizes were seen in Study 2. The Psychological and Physical Symptoms and Symptom Bother subscales significantly discriminated patient improvement ratings of GAPD and degree of penile curvature at Weeks 24 and 52. Conclusions The PDQ is highly responsive to change in men with PD.

Background: Qualitative data are lacking on decision making and factors surrounding changes in employment for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). This study aimed to increase our understanding of the key symptoms and factors leading patients with MS to leave work or reduce employment. Methods: Adults with MS who reported leaving the workforce, reducing work hours, or changing jobs due to MS in the past 6 months were recruited from four US clinical sites. Patients participated in semistructured interviews to discuss MS symptoms and reasons for changing employment status. All interviews were transcribed and coded for descriptive analyses. Results: Twenty-seven adults (mean age = 46.3 years, mean duration of MS diagnosis = 10.9 years) with a range of occupations participated; most were white (81.5%) and female (70.4%). Physical symptoms (eg, fatigue, visual deficits) (77.8%) were the most common reasons for employment change; 40.7% of patients reported at least one cognitive symptom (eg, memory loss). Fatigue emerged as the most pervasive symptom and affected physical and mental aspects of patients' jobs. Most patients (85.2%) reported at least two symptoms as drivers for change. Some patients reported a significant negative impact of loss of employment on their mental status, family life, and financial stability. Conclusions: Fatigue was the most common symptom associated with the decision to leave work or reduce employment and can lead to a worsening of other MS symptoms. Comprehensive symptom management, especially fatigue management, may help patients preserve their employment status.

Introduction The Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ) is a disease-specific, patient-reported outcome instrument designed to measure the psychosexual consequences and treatment outcomes of Peyronie's disease (PD). Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the test–retest reliability of the PDQ. Methods Adult men with PD were recruited through eight clinical sites across the United States. Participants completed the PDQ during two study visits scheduled 7 (±3) days apart. At Visit 1, participants completed a sociodemographic questionnaire, the PDQ, and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). At Visit 2, participants repeated the PDQ and completed an Overall Treatment Effect (OTE) scale. Test–retest reliability of the PDQ was assessed in a stable subsample (as determined by responses to the OTE). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to evaluate the degree of association between the three PDQ subscale scores at Visits 1 and 2. Internal consistency of the subscales was also evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. Main Outcome Measure The main outcome measure was the PDQ. Results Of the 61 PD patients (mean age 59.3) who took part in the study, the majority were not receiving treatment for their PD (n = 35, 57.4%). The sample's mean score on the erectile function domain of IIEF was 19.7 (±8.2), indicating mild–moderate dysfunction. Nearly two-thirds reported penile pain at baseline (n = 37, 63.8%). Of the participants with baseline PDQ data and who had engaged in vaginal intercourse in the past 3 months, 57 completed both study visits. The PDQ demonstrated excellent test–retest reliability in 53 stable patients. The ICC was 0.85 for the Psychological and Physical Symptom subscale, 0.89 for the Peyronie's Symptom Bother subscale, and 0.88 for the Penile Pain subscale. The Cronbach's alpha estimates for all three subscales were acceptable at the >0.70 level. Conclusions The PDQ is a highly reproducible measure of PD and can be an effective end point in clinical trials evaluating treatments for PD.

The urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) has emerged as a potential regulator of cell adhesion, cell migration, proliferation, differentiation, and cell survival in multiple physiologic and pathologic contexts. The urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) was the first identified ligand for uPAR, but elucidation of the specific functions of the uPA-uPAR interaction in vivo has been difficult because uPA has important physiologic functions that are independent of binding to uPAR and because uPAR engages multiple ligands. Here, we developed a new mouse strain (PlauGFDhu/GFDhu) in which the interaction between endogenous uPA and uPAR is selectively abrogated, whereas other functions of both the protease and its receptor are retained. Specifically, we introduced 4 amino acid substitutions into the growth factor domain (GFD) of uPA that abrogate uPAR binding while preserving the overall structure of the domain. Analysis of PlauGFDhu/GFDhu mice revealed an unanticipated role of the uPA-uPAR interaction in suppressing inflammation secondary to fibrin deposition. In contrast, leukocyte recruitment and tissue regeneration were unaffected by the loss of uPA binding to uPAR. This study identifies a principal in vivo role of the uPA-uPAR interaction in cell-associated fibrinolysis critical for suppression of fibrin accumulation and fibrin-associated inflammation and provides a valuable model for further exploration of this multifunctional receptor.

Anthrax lethal toxin (LT), a virulence factor secreted by Bacillus anthracis, is selectively toxic to human melanomas with the BRAF V600E activating mutation because of its proteolytic activities toward the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases (MEKs). To develop LT variants with lower in vivo toxicity and high tumor specificity, and therefore greater potential for clinical use, we generated a mutated LT that requires activation by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). This engineered toxin was less toxic than wild-type LT to mice because of the limited expression of MMPs by normal cells. Moreover, the systemically administered toxin produced greater anti-tumor effects than wild-type LT toward human xenografted tumors. This was shown to result from its greater bioavailability, a consequence of the limited uptake and clearance of the modified toxin by normal cells. Furthermore, the MMP-activated LT had very potent anti-tumor activity not only to human melanomas containing the BRAF mutation but also to other tumor types, including lung and colon carcinomas regardless of their BRAF status. Tumor histology and in vivo angiogenesis assays showed that this anti-tumor activity is due largely to the indirect targeting of tumor vasculature and angiogenic processes. Thus, even tumors genetically deficient in anthrax toxin receptors were still susceptible to the toxin therapy in vivo. Moreover, the modified toxin also displayed lower immunogenicity compared with the wild-type toxin. All these properties suggest that this MMP-activated anti-tumor toxin has potential for use in cancer therapy.

Human autosomal recessive ichthyosis with hypotrichosis (ARIH) is an inherited disorder recently linked to homozygosity for a point mutation in the ST14 gene that causes a G827R mutation in the matriptase serine protease domain (G216 in chymotrypsin numbering). Here we show that human G827R matriptase has strongly reduced proteolytic activity toward small molecule substrates, as well as toward its candidate epidermal target, prostasin. To further investigate the possible contribution of low matriptase activity to ARIH, we generated an ST14 hypomorphic mouse strain that displays a 100-fold reduction in epidermal matriptase mRNA levels. Interestingly, unlike ST14 null mice, ST14 hypomorphic mice were viable and fertile but displayed a spectrum of abnormalities that strikingly resembled ARIH. Thus, ST14 hypomorphic mice developed hyperproliferative and retention ichthyosis with impaired desquamation, hypotrichosis with brittle, thin, uneven, and sparse hair, and tooth defects. Biochemical analysis of ST14 hypomorphic epidermis revealed reduced prostasin proteolytic activation and profilaggrin proteolytic processing, compatible with a primary role of matriptase in this process. This work strongly indicates that reduced activity of a matriptase-prostasin proteolytic cascade is the etiological origin of human ARIH and provides an important mouse model for the exploration of matriptase function in ARIH, as well as multiple other physiological and pathological processes.

Recent gene ablation studies in mice have shown that matriptase, a type II transmembrane serine protease, and prostasin, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane serine protease, are both required for processing of the epidermis-specific polyprotein, profilaggrin, stratum corneum formation, and acquisition of epidermal barrier function. Here we present evidence that matriptase acts upstream of prostasin in a zymogen activation cascade that regulates terminal epidermal differentiation and is required for prostasin zymogen activation. Enzymatic gene trapping of matriptase combined with prostasin immunohistochemistry revealed that matriptase was co-localized with prostasin in transitional layer cells of the epidermis and that the developmental onset of expression of the two membrane proteases was coordinated and correlated with acquisition of epidermal barrier function. Purified soluble matriptase efficiently converted soluble prostasin zymogen to an active two-chain form that formed SDS-stable complexes with the serpin protease nexin-1. Whereas two forms of prostasin with molecular weights corresponding to the prostasin zymogen and active prostasin were present in wild type epidermis, prostasin was exclusively found in the zymogen form in matriptase-deficient epidermis. These data suggest that matriptase, an autoactivating protease, acts upstream from prostasin to initiate a zymogen cascade that is essential for epidermal differentiation.

e16620 Background: Patients with solid tumors and bone metastases often experience skeletal-related events (SREs) and pain. Although cost-utility models are often used to estimate treatment outcome...

INTRODUCTION: Patients with bone metastases often experience skeletal-related events (SREs). Although cost-utility models are used to examine treatments for metastatic cancer, limited information is available on utilities of SREs. The purpose of this study was to estimate the disutility of four SREs: spinal cord compression, pathological fracture, radiation to bone, and surgery performed to stabilize a bone. METHODS: General population participants from the UK and Canada completed time trade-off (TTO) interviews to assess the utility of health states drafted based on literature review, clinician interviews, and patient interviews. Respondents first rated a health state describing cancer with bone metastases. Then, the SREs were added to this health state. RESULTS: Interviews were completed with 187 participants (50.8 % male, 80.2 % white). Cancer with bone metastases without an SRE had a mean utility of 0.47 (SD = 0.43) on a standard utility scale (1 = full health, 0 = death). Of the SREs, spinal cord compression was associated with the greatest disutility (i.e. the utility decrease): -0.32 with paralysis and -0.22 without paralysis. Surgery had a disutility of -0.07. Leg, arm, and rib fractures had disutilities of -0.06, -0.04, and -0.03. Two weeks of daily radiation treatment had a disutility of -0.06, while two radiation appointments had the smallest impact on utility (-0.02). CONCLUSION: All SREs were associated with statistically significant utility decreases, suggesting a perceived impact on quality of life beyond the impact of cancer with bone metastases. The resulting disutilities may be used in cost-utility models examining treatments to prevent SREs secondary to bone metastases., JOURNAL ARTICLE, SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/inPress

Purpose When treating metastatic bone disease, relief of bone pain is often a key outcome. Because pain cannot be quantified with objective clinical measures, patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are required to assess patients' subjective experience. The goal of the current review was to examine measures used to assess pain, as well as the impact of pain on functional status and health-related quality of life (HRQL), in trials of bisphosphonates for the treatment of bone metastases. Methods A literature search focused on articles published from January 1999 to April 2009. Results A total of 49 articles were located that used PROs to assess pain-related outcomes of bisphosphonate treatment for bone metastases. The Brief Pain Inventory was the most commonly used multi-item instrument. However, the most common approach for assessing pain was to administer a single-item scale such as a visual analog scale, numerical rating scale, or verbal rating scale. Of the 49 studies, 19 included a PRO assessing functional status or HRQL. Conclusions Although pain is an important outcome of trials examining treatment for bone metastases, the current review suggests that there is little consistency in PRO measurement across studies. Furthermore, presentation of measures often lacked clear description, information on measurement properties, citations, clarity regarding method of administration, and consistent instrument names. Recommendations are provided for instrument validation within the target population, assessment of content validity, use of PRO instruments recently developed for patients with bone metastases, clear description of instruments, and implementation of measures consistent with recommendations from instrument developers.