1. Comparison of intravenous nalbuphine and dexmedetomidine in combination with lidocaine aerosol inhalation in awake direct laryngoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
- Author
-
Li, Xingxing, Xie, Cuiyu, Wu, Yangyang, Zhong, Weiwei, Lu, Yao, and Li, Yuanhai
- Subjects
- *
OXYGEN saturation , *LOSS of consciousness , *PATIENT satisfaction , *NALBUPHINE , *LIDOCAINE , *COUGH , *BRONCHOSCOPES - Abstract
Background: The airway should be thoroughly and accurately evaluated before anesthesia induction and endotracheal intubation. Awake direct laryngoscopy (ADL) can provide rapid, accurate, and intuitive airway assessment, especially for suspected difficult airways, and sometimes eliminates the need for fiberoptic intubation in some suspicious difficult airway cases. However, an optimal regimen has not been determined. Methods: In this double-blind, controlled study, prior to ADL, 60 patients scheduled for general anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive 0.75 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine (Dex group, n = 20), 0.15 mg/kg of nalbuphine (Nal group, n = 20), or a placebo (control group, n = 20) intravenously over 10 min. At the same time, all study subjects received nebulized lidocaine for 15 min. The primary outcome was patient tolerance as assessed by a 5-point ADL comfort score, while secondary outcomes included satisfaction, coughing, pain, nausea and vital signs. Results: Patients undergoing ADL in the Nal group had higher tolerance scores than those in the control and Dex groups [4 (3,4) vs. 3 (2,2.75), P < 0.017, and 4 (3,4) vs. 2 (2,2,75), P < 0.001, respectively] and higher satisfaction [7 (6,8) vs. 4 (3,5.75), P < 0.017, and 7 (6,8) vs. 5.5 (5,6), P < 0.001, respectively]. Additionally, the Nal group had significantly fewer adverse events, such as pain and nausea than the control and Dex groups. The sedation score and peripheral oxygen and saturation were significantly higher in the Nal group than in the Dex group, with no difference between the Nal and control groups (P < 0.001, P = 0.159, respectively). Conclusions: Intravenous nalbuphine in combination with lidocaine aerosol inhalation significantly improved patient tolerance and satisfaction while reducing nausea, coughing, pain, sedation, and SpO2 levels during ADL. Highlights: • Awake direct laryngoscopy (ADL) allows rapid and accurate assessment of suspicious airways prior to the induction of anesthesia. • The combination of nalbuphine and lidocaine resulted in higher tolerability, comfort, and satisfaction than dexmedetomidine combined with lidocaine or lidocaine alone during ADL. • Nalbuphine combined with lidocaine could be safer than dexmedetomidine combined with lidocaine in terms of maintaining higher SpO2 levels and reducing the risk of loss of consciousness during anesthesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF