Search

Severe asthma (SA) poses a significant challenge to management and treatment, leading to a reduced quality of life and a heavy burden on society and healthcare resources. Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) has emerged as a non-pharmacological intervention for SA, demonstrating its efficacy and safety in improving patients' quality of life and reducing exacerbation rates for over a decade. In particular, BT encounters various obstacles in its clinical application. Since asthma is characterized by high heterogeneity, not all patients derive effective outcomes from BT. Furthermore, current knowledge of markers that indicate response to BT remains limited. Recent research has shed light on the intricate mechanism of action of BT, which extends beyond simple smooth muscle ablation. Therefore, to enhance the clinical practice and implementation of BT, this paper aims to elucidate the mechanism of action and identify potential markers associated with BT response. Plain language summary: A review of a non-drug treatment for asthma to better understand the potential mechanisms and markers of the treatment A non-drug treatment for asthma: Severe asthma leads to a low quality of life and places a heavy burden on society and healthcare resources. A non-drug treatment for asthma called bronchial thermoplasty is a technique that uses high temperatures to remove excess airway muscle. Its efficacy and safety in improving asthma patients' quality of life have been demonstrated for more than a decade. Barriers to the treatment development: When it comes to clinical application, bronchial thermoplasty faces several barriers. Asthma is characterized by high variability, and not all patients have good outcomes from bronchial thermoplasty. Understanding of the effectiveness of bronchial thermoplasty remains limited. New insights into how the treatment works: Recent research has found that the effect of bronchial thermoplasty is complicated and goes beyond simple muscle removal. What is the aim of this review: To improve the use of bronchial thermoplasty by discussing its effects on the body and identifying ways to measure how effective the treatment is. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways characterized by airway wall remodeling, bronchial hyperreactivity, and smooth muscle remodeling. It manifests as episodes of wheezing, shortness of breath, chest tightness, and dry cough. The development of the disease is influenced by both environmental and genetic factors, and the prevalence of the disease in the population is increasing. Asthma symptoms can worsen upon exposure to triggering factors, whether allergic or non-allergic, leading to excessive migration of immune cells and over-production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which stimulate inflammation in the bronchi, and cause changes in the bronchial epithelium and smooth muscles. One of the therapeutic options is bronchial thermoplasty, an endoscopic procedure involving application of radiofrequency energy to bronchi with a diameter of 3- 10 mm. Under the influence of this energy, a high temperature is generated, which leads to reduction in smooth muscle mass and decrease in bronchial obstruction. Additionally, there is a reduction in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which are one of the factors causing bronchoconstriction. Patients who underwent the procedure showed an improvement in quality of life, a decrease in asthma exacerbations, and hospitalizations for up to 10 years postprocedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) decreases the incidence of asthma exacerbations, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations among patients with severe asthma. Predictors of BT effectiveness remain unclear as its mechanism of action and invasiveness remain obscure. This study aimed to identify factors that could predict BT outcomes. Two respiratory physicians treated 20 consecutive patients with severe asthma using BT. The patients were assigned to groups based on clinical remission following an expert consensus proposed in 2020. Predictors of clinical remission were analyzed using asthma control test (ACT) score, pulmonary function and blood tests, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide. At baseline, the median age was 44 years (interquartile range [IQR], 31.0–52.8), and pre-bronchodilator (pre-BD) percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (%FEV1) was 85.9% (IQR, 74.8–100.5). Six (30%) patients achieved clinical remission. Among the patients treated with biologics, 20% had clinical remission, and 20% discontinued biologic therapy. The pre-BT ACT score was significantly lower in the group with than without remission (11.0 [IQR, 8.0–14.5] vs. 15.0 [IQR, 11.0–17.3], p =.016). Adverse events did not significantly differ between the groups. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to use clinical remission as a criterion for evaluating BT efficacy. The pre-BT ACT score might a the predict response to BT in younger adult patients with severe asthma and pre-BD %FEV1 ≥ 70%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bronchial thermoplasty (BT), an effective treatment for severe asthma, requires heat to reach the airway to reduce the mass of airway smooth muscle cells (ASMCs). Autophagy is involved in the pathological process of airway remodeling in patients with asthma. However, it remains unclear whether autophagy participates in controlling airway remodeling induced by BT. In this study, we aim to elucidate the autophagy-mediated molecular mechanisms in BT. Our study reveal that the number of autophagosomes and the level of alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) fluorescence are significantly decreased in airway biopsy tissues after BT. As the temperature increased, BT causes a decrease in cell proliferation and a concomitant increase in the apoptosis of human airway smooth muscle cells (HASMCs). Furthermore, increase in temperature significantly downregulates cellular autophagy, autophagosome accumulation, the LC3II/LC3I ratio, and Beclin-1 expression, upregulates p62 expression, and inhibits the AMPK/mTOR pathway. Furthermore, cotreatment with AICAR (an AMPK agonist) or RAPA (an mTOR antagonist) abolishes the inhibition of autophagy and attenuates the increase in the apoptosis rate of HASMCs induced by the thermal effect. Therefore, we conclude that BT decreases airway remodeling by blocking autophagy induced by the AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway in HASMCs.

Sumiko Abe,1 Mina Yasuda,1,2 Kazunori Tobino,1,2 Sonoko Harada,1,3 Hitoshi Sasano,1 Yuki Tanabe,1 Yuuki Sandhu,1 Tomohito Takeshige,1 Kei Matsuno,1 Tetsuhiko Asao,1 Takuto Sueyasu,2 Saori Nishizawa,2 Kohei Yoshimine,2 Yuki Ko,2 Yuki Yoshimatsu,2 Kosuke Tsuruno,2 Hiromi Ide,2 Haruhi Takagi,1 Jun Ito,1 Tetsutaro Nagaoka,1 Norihiro Harada,1,3,4 Kazuhisa Takahashi1,4 1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; 2Department of Respiratory Medicine, Iizuka Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan; 3Atopy (Allergy) Research Center, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; 4Research Institute for Diseases of Old Age, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanCorrespondence: Norihiro Harada, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8431, Japan, Tel +81-3-5802-1063, Fax +81-3-5802-1617, Email nor@juntendo.ac.jpBackground: Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) improves clinical outcomes and quality of life for patients with severe asthma and has shown sustained reductions in airway narrowing and air trapping in previous CT studies. However, there is a lack of a comprehensive analysis, including CT evaluation, of clinical outcomes in Japanese patients who have undergone BT for severe asthma. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of BT in Japanese asthma patients, with a focus on the CT metric “WA at Pi10” to assess airway disease.Methods: Twelve patients with severe persistent asthma who underwent BT were assessed using ACQ6, AQLQ, pulmonary function tests, FeNO measurement, blood sampling, and chest CT before BT and one year after the third procedure for the upper lobes.Results: The median age of the patient was 62.0 years, 7/12 (58.3%) were male, 4/12 (33.3%) used regular oral corticosteroids, and 8/12 (66.7%) received biologics. Median FEV1% was 73.6%, and median peripheral eosinophil count was 163.8/μL. After one year of BT, ACQ6 scores improved from 2.4 to 0.8 points (p = 0.007), and AQLQ scores improved from 4.3 to 5.8 points (p < 0.001). Significant improvements were also observed in asthma exacerbations, unscheduled visits due to exacerbations, FeNO, and √WA at Pi10 (p < 0.05). The baseline mucus score on the CT findings was negatively correlated with FEV1 (r = − 0.688, p = 0.013) and with the maximum mid-expiratory flow rate (r = − 0.631, p = 0.028), and positively correlated with the peripheral blood eosinophil count (r = − 0.719, p = 0.008). Changes in √WA at Pi10 after one year were positively correlated with changes in the mucus score (r = 0.742, p = 0.007).Conclusion: This study has limitations, including its single-arm observational design and the small sample size. However, BT led to a symptomatic improvement in patients with severe asthma. The validated “√WA at Pi10” metric on CT effectively evaluated the therapeutic response in Japanese asthma patients after BT.Keywords: asthma, bronchial thermoplasty, chest computed tomography, asthma control questionnaire, √WA at Pi10

The incidence of obesity and asthma continues to enhance, significantly impacting global public health. Adipose tissue is an organ that secretes hormones and cytokines, causes meta-inflammation, and contributes to the intensification of bronchial hyperreactivity, oxidative stress, and consequently affects the different phenotypes of asthma in obese people. As body weight increases, the risk of severe asthma increases, as well as more frequent exacerbations requiring the use of glucocorticoids and hospitalization, which consequently leads to a deterioration of the quality of life. This review discusses the relationship between obesity and severe asthma, the underlying molecular mechanisms, changes in respiratory function tests in obese people, its impact on the occurrence of comorbidities, and consequently, a different response to conventional asthma treatment. The article also reviews research on possible future therapies for severe asthma. The manuscript is a narrative review of clinical trials in severe asthma and comorbid obesity. The articles were found in the PubMed database using the keywords asthma and obesity. Studies on severe asthma were then selected for inclusion in the article. The sections: 'The classification connected with asthma and obesity', 'Obesity-related changes in pulmonary functional tests', and 'Obesity and inflammation', include studies on subjects without asthma or non-severe asthma, which, according to the authors, familiarize the reader with the pathophysiology of obesity-related asthma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a recently developed non-pharmacological therapy for refractory bronchial asthma. Although increasing evidence has suggested that BT is effective for various phenotypes of severe asthma, its safety and efficacy in patients with severe irreversible impaired lung function are unclear. Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of BT in patients with refractory asthma, including patients with a severely impaired forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Design: This was a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 15 patients with refractory asthma (Global Initiative for Asthma step 4 or 5), including patients with severely impaired airflow limitation (% predicted pre-bronchodilator FEV1 <60%), who had undergone BT between June 2016 and January 2022. We analyzed the efficacy (change in asthma symptoms, exacerbation rate, pulmonary function, asthma medication, and serum inflammatory chemokine/cytokines before and after BT) and complications in all patients. We compared these data between patients with severe obstructive lung dysfunction [group 1(G1)] and patients with FEV1 ⩾ 60% [group 2 (G2)]. Results: Six patients were in G1 and nine were in G2. Clinical characteristics, T2 inflammation, and concurrent treatment were equivalent in both groups. BT significantly improved asthma-related symptoms (measured using the Asthma Control Test and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores) in both groups. FEV1 was significantly improved in G1 but not in G2. Four patients in G2, but none in G1, experienced asthma exacerbation requiring additional systemic corticosteroids (including two requiring prolonged hospitalization) after BT. Long-term responders (patients who reduced systemic or inhaled corticosteroid without newly adding biologics in a follow-up > 2 years) of BT were identified in G1 and G2 (n = 2, 33.3% and n = 4, 44.4%, respectively). Conclusion: BT in patients with refractory asthma and severe airflow limitation is equally safe and efficacious as that in patients with moderate airflow limitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a treatment for patients with poorly controlled, severe asthma. However, predictors of treatment response to BT are defined poorly. Do baseline radiographic and clinical characteristics exist that predict response to BT? We conducted a longitudinal prospective cohort study of participants with severe asthma receiving BT across eight academic medical centers. Participants received three separate BT treatments and were monitored at 3-month intervals for 1 year after BT. Similar to prior studies, a positive response to BT was defined as either improvement in Asthma Control Test results of ≥ 3 or Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire of ≥ 0.5. Regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between pretreatment clinical and quantitative CT scan measures with subsequent BT response. From 2006 through 2017, 88 participants received BT, with 70 participants (79.5%) identified as responders by Asthma Control Test or Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire criteria. Responders were less likely to undergo an asthma-related ICU admission in the prior year (3% vs 25%; P =.01). On baseline quantitative CT imaging, BT responders showed less air trapping percentage (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.99; P =.03), a greater Jacobian determinant (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.05-2.11), greater SD of the Jacobian determinant (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.04-3.26), and greater anisotropic deformation index (OR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.06-8.86). To our knowledge, this is the largest study to evaluate baseline quantitative CT imaging and clinical characteristics associated with BT response. Our results show that preservation of normal lung expansion, indicated by less air trapping, a greater magnitude of isotropic expansion, and greater within-lung spatial variation on quantitative CT imaging, were predictors of future BT response. ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01185275; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Irritant-induced asthma (IIA) may develop after acute inhalational exposure in individuals without preexisting asthma. The effect of bronchial thermoplasty to treat intractable, worsening IIA has not yet been described. We evaluated a previously healthy 52-year-old man after inhalation of an unknown white powder. His pulmonary function and symptoms/quality of life worsened over 4 years, despite maximal guidelines-based asthma therapy. We acquired 129Xe MRI and pulmonary function test measurements on three occasions including before and after bronchial thermoplasty treatment. Seven months after bronchial thermoplasty, improved MRI ventilation and oscillometry small airway resistance were observed. Spirometry and asthma control did not improve until 19 months after bronchial thermoplasty, 5.5 years postexposure. Together, oscillometry measurements of the small airways and 129Xe MRI provided effort-independent, sensitive, and objective measurements of response to therapy. Improved MRI and oscillometry small airway resistance measurements temporally preceded improved airflow obstruction and may be considered for complex asthma cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Rationale Severe asthma affects a small proportion of asthmatics but represents a significant healthcare challenge. Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is an interventional treatment approach preconized for uncontrolled severe asthma after considering biologics therapy. It was showed that BT long-lastingly improves asthma control. These improvements seem to be related to the ability of BT to reduce airway smooth muscle remodeling, reduce the number of nerve fibers and to modulate bronchial epithelium integrity and behavior. Current evidence suggest that BT downregulates epithelial mucins expression, cytokine production and metabolic profile. Despite these observations, biological mechanisms explaining asthma control improvement post-BT are still not well understood. Objectives To assess whether BT affects gene signatures in bronchial epithelial cells (BECs). Methods In this study we evaluated the transcriptome of cultured bronchial epithelial cells (BECs) of severe asthmatics obtained pre- and post-BT treatment using microarrays. We further validated gene and protein expressions in BECs and in bronchial biopsies with immunohistochemistry pre- and post-BT treatment. Measurements and main results Transcriptomics analysis revealed that a large portion of differentially expressed genes (DEG) was involved in anti-viral response, anti-microbial response and pathogen induced cytokine storm signaling pathway. S100A gene family stood out as five members of this family where consistently downregulated post-BT. Further validation revealed that S100A7, S100A8, S100A9 and their receptor (RAGE, TLR4, CD36) expressions were highly enriched in severe asthmatic BECs. Further, these S100A family members were downregulated at the gene and protein levels in BECs and in bronchial biopsies of severe asthmatics post-BT. TLR4 and CD36 protein expression were also reduced in BECs post-BT. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) and human β-defensin 2 (hBD2) were significantly decreased while no significant change was observed in IL-25 and IL-33. Conclusions These data suggest that BT might improve asthma control by downregulating epithelial derived S100A family expression and related downstream signaling pathways.

Abstract Objectives To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of bronchial thermoplasty (BT) in treating patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods Clinical data of 57 COPD patients were randomized into the control (n = 29, conventional inhalation therapy) or intervention group (n = 28, conventional inhalation therapy plus BT). Primary outcomes were differences in clinical symptom changes, pulmonary function-related indicators, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC), 6-min walk test (6MWT), COPD assessment test (CAT) score and acute exacerbation incidence from baseline to an average of 3 and 12 months. Safety was assessed by adverse events. Results FEV1, FEV1(%, predicted) and FVC in both groups improved to varying degrees post-treatment compared with those pre-treatment (P

Abstract Severe asthma affects approximately 5%–10% of patients with asthma. Herein, we describe a case of non‐type 2 asthma that progressively worsened over the years. An 80‐year‐old woman was diagnosed with asthma 11 years back. She experienced repeated exacerbations requiring treatment with systemic corticosteroid despite therapy with medications including high‐dose inhaled corticosteroids/long‐acting beta‐agonists plus long‐acting muscarinic antagonist. The patient presented with non‐eosinophilic asthma. Therefore, the patient was initially treated with bronchial thermoplasty, which was effective for 1 year only. Treatment with bronchial thermoplasty, benralizumab, dupilumab, and mepolizumab was ineffective. The fourth treatment, which included tezepelumab, was initiated. The patient's symptoms and quality of life improved significantly. This is the first case of a patient who did not respond to sequential bronchial thermoplasty, benralizumab, dupilumab, and mepolizumab but who presented with good clinical response to tezepelumab. Therefore, tezepelumab may be useful for patients with non‐type 2 asthma.

Rationale: Severe asthma affects a small proportion of asthmatics but represents a significant healthcare challenge. Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is an interventional treatment approach preconized for uncontrolled severe asthma after considering biologics therapy. It was showed that BT long-lastingly improves asthma control. These improvements seem to be related to the ability of BT to reduce airway smooth muscle remodeling, reduce the number of nerve fibers and to modulate bronchial epithelium integrity and behavior. Current evidence suggest that BT downregulates epithelial mucins expression, cytokine production and metabolic profile. Despite these observations, biological mechanisms explaining asthma control improvement post-BT are still not well understood. Objectives: To assess whether BT affects gene signatures in bronchial epithelial cells (BECs). Methods: In this study we evaluated the transcriptome of cultured bronchial epithelial cells (BECs) of severe asthmatics obtained pre- and post-BT treatment using microarrays. We further validated gene and protein expressions in BECs and in bronchial biopsies with immunohistochemistry pre- and post-BT treatment. Measurements and main results: Transcriptomics analysis revealed that a large portion of differentially expressed genes (DEG) was involved in anti-viral response, anti-microbial response and pathogen induced cytokine storm signaling pathway. S100A gene family stood out as five members of this family where consistently downregulated post-BT. Further validation revealed that S100A7, S100A8, S100A9 and their receptor (RAGE, TLR4, CD36) expressions were highly enriched in severe asthmatic BECs. Further, these S100A family members were downregulated at the gene and protein levels in BECs and in bronchial biopsies of severe asthmatics post-BT. TLR4 and CD36 protein expression were also reduced in BECs post-BT. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) and human β-defensin 2 (hBD2) were significantly decreased while no significant change was observed in IL-25 and IL-33. Conclusions: These data suggest that BT might improve asthma control by downregulating epithelial derived S100A family expression and related downstream signaling pathways. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: Outside clinical trials, there is limited long‐term data following bronchial thermoplasty (BT). In a cohort of real‐world severe asthmatics in an era of biological therapy, we sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BT 5 years post‐treatment. Methods: Every patient treated with BT at two Australian tertiary centres were recalled at 5 years, and evaluated by interview and record review, Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), spirometry and high‐resolution CT Chest. CT scans were interpreted using the modified Reiff and BRICS CT scoring systems for bronchiectasis. Results: Fifty‐one patients were evaluated. At baseline, this cohort had a mean age of 59.0 ± 11.8 years, mean ACQ of 3.0 ± 1.0, mean FEV1 of 55.5 ± 18.8% predicted, and 53% were receiving maintenance oral steroids in addition to triple inhaler therapy. At 5 years, there was a sustained improvement in ACQ scores to 1.8 ± 1.0 (p < 0.001). Steroid requiring exacerbation frequency was reduced from 3.8 ± 3.6 to 1.0 ± 1.6 exacerbations per annum (p < 0.001). 44% of patients had been weaned off oral steroids. No change in spirometry was observed. CT scanning identified minor degrees of localized radiological bronchiectasis in 23/47 patients with the modified Reiff score increasing from 0.6 ± 2.6 at baseline to 1.3 ± 2.5 (p < 0.001). However, no patients exhibited clinical features of bronchiectasis, such as recurrent bacterial infection. Conclusion: Sustained clinical benefit from BT at 5 years was demonstrated in this cohort of very severe asthmatics. Mild, localized radiological bronchiectasis was identified in a portion of patients without clinical features of bronchiectasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Jerzy Soja,1,2 Karolina Górka,1,2 Iwona Gross-Sondej,1,2 Bogdan Jakie&lstrok;a,2 S&lstrok;awomir Mikrut,3 Krzysztof Oko&nacute;,4 Adam &Cacute;miel,5 Piotr Sadowski,4 Wojciech Szczeklik,6 Anna Andrychiewicz,7 Tomasz Stachura,1,2 Gra&zdot;yna Bochenek,1,2 Stanis&lstrok;awa Bazan-Socha,2 Krzysztof S&lstrok;adek1,2 1Department of Pulmonology and Allergology, University Hospital, Kraków, Poland; 2 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland; 3Faculty of Mining, Surveying and Environmental Engineering, AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland; 4Department of Pathology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland; 5Department of Applied Mathematics, AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland; 6Centre for Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland; 7Department of Endoscopy, University Hospital, Kraków, PolandCorrespondence: Jerzy Soja, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Jakubowskiego 2, Krakow, 30-688, Poland, Email jerzy.soja@uj.edu.plBackground: Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is an interventional endoscopic treatment for severe asthma leading to the clinical improvement, but morphologic changes of bronchial wall related to the procedure and predictors of a favorable response to BT remain uncertain. The aim of the study was to validate an endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) in assessing the effectiveness of BT treatment.Methods: Patients with severe asthma who met the clinical criteria for BT were included. In all patients clinical data, ACT and AQLQ questionnaires, laboratory tests, pulmonary function tests and bronchoscopy with radial probe EBUS and bronchial biopsies were collected. BT was performed in patients with the thickest bronchial wall L2 layer representing ASM. These patients were evaluated before and after 12 months of follow-up. The relationship between baseline parameters and clinical response was explored.Results: Forty patients with severe asthma were enrolled to the study. All 11 patients qualified to BT successfully completed the 3 sessions of bronchoscopy. BT improved asthma control (P=0.006), quality of life (P=0.028) and decreased exacerbation rate (P=0.005). Eight of the 11 patients (72.7%) showed a clinically meaningful improvement. BT also led to a significant decrease in the thicknesses of bronchial wall layers in EBUS (L1 decreased from 0.183 to 0.173 mm, P=0.003; L2 from 0.207 to 0.185 mm, P = 0.003; and L3– 5 from 0.969 to 0.886 mm, P=0.003). Median ASM mass decreased by 61.8% (P=0.002). However, there was no association between baseline patient characteristics and the magnitude of clinical improvement after BT.Conclusion: BT was associated with a significant decrease in the thickness of the bronchial wall layers measured by EBUS including L2 layer representing ASM and ASM mass reduction in bronchial biopsy. EBUS can assess bronchial structural changes related to BT; however, it did not predict the favorable clinical response to therapy.Keywords: airway remodeling, airway smooth muscle, bronchial thermoplasty, bronchial wall layers, endobronchial ultrasound

Severe asthma affects approximately 5%–10% of patients with asthma. Herein, we describe a case of non‐type 2 asthma that progressively worsened over the years. An 80‐year‐old woman was diagnosed with asthma 11 years back. She experienced repeated exacerbations requiring treatment with systemic corticosteroid despite therapy with medications including high‐dose inhaled corticosteroids/long‐acting beta‐agonists plus long‐acting muscarinic antagonist. The patient presented with non‐eosinophilic asthma. Therefore, the patient was initially treated with bronchial thermoplasty, which was effective for 1 year only. Treatment with bronchial thermoplasty, benralizumab, dupilumab, and mepolizumab was ineffective. The fourth treatment, which included tezepelumab, was initiated. The patient's symptoms and quality of life improved significantly. This is the first case of a patient who did not respond to sequential bronchial thermoplasty, benralizumab, dupilumab, and mepolizumab but who presented with good clinical response to tezepelumab. Therefore, tezepelumab may be useful for patients with non‐type 2 asthma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of bronchial thermoplasty (BT) in treating patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: Clinical data of 57 COPD patients were randomized into the control (n = 29, conventional inhalation therapy) or intervention group (n = 28, conventional inhalation therapy plus BT). Primary outcomes were differences in clinical symptom changes, pulmonary function-related indicators, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC), 6-min walk test (6MWT), COPD assessment test (CAT) score and acute exacerbation incidence from baseline to an average of 3 and 12 months. Safety was assessed by adverse events. Results: FEV1, FEV1(%, predicted) and FVC in both groups improved to varying degrees post-treatment compared with those pre-treatment (P < 0.05). The Intervention group showed greater improving amplitudes of FEV1 (Ftime × between groups = 21.713, P < 0.001) and FEV1(%, predicted) (Ftime × between groups = 31.216, P < 0.001) than the control group, and there was no significant difference in FVC variation trend (Ftime × between groups = 1.705, P = 0.193). mMRC, 6MWT and CAT scores of both groups post-treatment improved to varying degrees (Ps < 0.05), but the improving amplitudes of mMRC (Ftime × between groups = 3.947, P = 0.025), 6MWT (Ftime × between groups = 16.988, P < 0.001) and CAT score (Ftime × between groups = 16.741, P < 0.001) in the intervention group were greater than the control group. According to risk assessment of COPD acute exacerbation, the proportion of high-risk COPD patients with acute exacerbation in the control and intervention groups at 1 year post-treatment (100% vs 65%, 100% vs 28.6%), inpatient proportion (100% vs 62.1%; 100% vs 28.6%), COPD acute exacerbations [3.0 (2.50, 5.0) vs 1.0 (1.0, 2.50); 3.0(3.0, 4.0) vs 0 (0, 1.0)] and hospitalizations [2.0 (2.0, 3.0) vs 1.0 (0, 2.0); 2.0 (2.0, 3.0) vs 0 (0, 1.0)] were significantly lower than those pre-treatment (P < 0.05). Besides, data of the intervention group were significantly lower than the control group at each timepoint after treatment (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Combined BT therapy is superior to conventional medical treatment in improving lung function and quality of life of COPD patients, and it also significantly reduces the COPD exacerbation risk without causing serious adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pieta C Wijsman,1,&ast; Annika WM Goorsenberg,1,&ast; Abilash Ravi,1,2,&ast; Julia NS d’Hooghe,1 Barbara S Dierdorp,2 Tamara Dekker,2 Charlotte CLM van Schaik,1 Nick HT ten Hacken,3 Pallav L Shah,4– 6 Els JM Weersink,1 Elisabeth H Bel,1 Jouke T Annema,1 René Lutter,1,2 Peter I Bonta1 1Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 2Department of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 3Department of Pulmonology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; 4Department of Pulmonology, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; 5National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK; 6Department of Pulmonology, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, London, UK&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Peter I Bonta, Email p.i.bonta@amsterdamumc.nlBackground: Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a bronchoscopic treatment for severe asthma, of which the working mechanism and responder profile are partly unknown. The aim of this study is to analyse whether BT alters airway inflammation by epithelial gene expression, inflammatory cell counts and cytokines, and whether this relates to treatment response.Methods: In this clinical trial, 28 severe asthma patients underwent bronchoscopy before and after treatment to obtain bronchial brushes and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) from treated and untreated airways. RNA was extracted from bronchial brushes for transcriptome analysis, and BALF cells and cytokines were analysed. Asthma quality of life questionnaires were used to distinguish responders from non-responders. We compared results before and after treatment, between treated and untreated airways, and between responders and non-responders.Results: Gene expression of airway epithelium related to airway inflammation gene set was significantly downregulated in treated airways compared to untreated airways, although this did not differ for patients before and after treatment. No differences were observed in cell counts and cytokines, neither from the untreated compared to treated airways, nor before and after treatment. At baseline, compared to non-responders, the expression of genes related to glycolysis in bronchial epithelium was downregulated and both BALF and blood eosinophil counts were higher in responders.Conclusion: Local differences in gene sets pertaining to epithelial inflammatory status were identified between treated and untreated airways after treatment, not resulting in changes in differential cell counts and cytokine analyses in BALF. Secondly, baseline epithelial glycolysis genes and eosinophil counts in BALF and blood were different between responders and non-responders. The observations from this study demonstrate the potential impact of BT on epithelial gene expression related to airway inflammation while also identifying a possible responder profile.Keywords: airway inflammation, bronchial thermoplasty, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cells, cytokines, epithelial transcriptome

Background: The action mechanism of bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is poorly understood. Generally, patients with severe asthma who are in desperate need of treatment have relatively low baseline values. In this paper, we describe the case of an asthmatic patient who was saved by a combination of therapy and bronchial thermoplasty. Case information: A patient with near-fatal asthma was initially treated in our hospital with conventional medication, but his condition did not improve. The patient was next subjected to invasive mechanical ventilation, which did not provide significant relief. Additionally, he was treated with BT in conjunction with mechanical ventilation, which promptly reversed his status asthmaticus and stabilized his condition. Conclusion: Patients with near-fatal asthma who do not react effectively to aggressive therapy may benefit from BT.

Despite the relatively short follow-up period in our previous study, we had reported that increased cough reflex sensitivity (CRS) may predict the efficacy of bronchial thermoplasty (BT) for treating asthma. Herein, we examined whether CRS predicts the efficacy of BT 2 years after the final BT treatment. We also investigated the influence of BT on CRS. We reviewed 10 patients 2 years after their final BT treatment. CRS, asthma-related symptoms, asthma exacerbations, and cough-related quality of life were assessed at baseline and 2 years after BT. Five patients responded positively to BT (BT responders) and their asthma control improved. No significant difference in CRS at baseline was detected between the BT responders and nonresponders. In contrast, BT responders exhibited significant improvements in CRS 2 years after BT. CRS at baseline could not predict the BT efficacy after 2 years. This is the first report demonstrating BT desensitized CRS in consecutive case series. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Jessica Keim-Malpass,1– 3 H Charles Malpass4 1University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA, USA; 2Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA; 3University of Virginia Center for Advanced Medical Analytics, Charlottesville, VA, USA; 4Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USACorrespondence: Jessica Keim-Malpass, University of Virginia School of Nursing, PO Box 800782, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA, Email Jlk2t@virginia.eduBackground: Asthma is a disease with tremendous phenotypic heterogeneity, and the patients who are most severely impacted by the disease are high utilizers of the United States healthcare system. In the past decade, there has been many advances in asthma therapy for those with severe disease, including the use of a procedure called bronchial thermoplasty (BT) and the use of biologic therapy for certain phenotypes, but questions remain regarding the long-term durability and cost effectiveness of these therapies. The purpose of this analysis was (1) to assess the cost utility of BT relative to usual care (base case) and (2) to assess the cost utility of BT relative to usual care plus biologic therapy (omalizumab) (scenario analysis) based on updated 10-year clinical trial outcomes.Methods: A Markov cohort model was developed and used to estimate the cost utility of BT to estimate the costs and quality-of-life impact of BT versus the comparisons over a 10-year time frame using a limited societal perspective, which included both direct health utilization costs and indirect costs associated with missed days of work, among those with severe persistent asthma.Results: In the base case and the scenario analysis, BT was the dominant treatment strategy compared to usual care alone and usual care plus biologic therapy. The net monetary benefit for BT was $483,555.49 over a 10-year time horizon.Conclusion: Cost-utility models are central to policy decisions dictating coverage, and can be extended to inform the patient and provider, during clinical decision-making, of the relative trade-offs of therapy, assessing long-term clinical and cost outcomes. Phenotypic classification of severe asthma is central to patient management and should also be integrated into economic analysis frameworks, particularly as new biologic agents are developed that are specific to a phenotype. Despite a larger upfront cost of BT therapy, there is a durable clinical and economic benefit over time for those with severe asthma.Keywords: asthma, bronchial thermoplasty, cost-effectiveness analysis, economic evaluation, heterogeneity, cost-utility analysis, phenotype

Abstract Background Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is an effective treatment in severe asthma. How to select patients who more likely benefit from BT is an unmet clinical need. Moreover, mechanisms of BT efficacy are still largely unknown. We sought to determine BT efficacy and to identify potential mechanisms of response. Methods This retrospective cohort study evaluated clinical outcomes in 27 patients with severe asthma: 13 with T2-high and 14 with T2-low endotype. Expression levels of 20 genes were compared by real-time PCR in bronchial biopsies performed at the third BT session versus baseline. Clinical response was measured based on Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score

Tao Wang,1,2,&ast; Fa Long,1,&ast; Zhihui Huang,1 Liang Long,1 Wenting Huang,1 Siyu Hu,1 Fengbo Hu,1 Peng Fu,1 Jingfan Gan,1 Hongbo Dong,1 Guomei Yan1 1University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China; 2The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Fa Long, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Shenzhen Hospital, No. 4253, Songbai Road, Guangming District, Shenzhen, 518106, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-755-27461986, Email longfa_923@163.comObjective: To investigate the relation of activation site and number with clinical response to bronchial thermoplasty (BT) in refractory asthma patients.Methods: This work included 106 consecutive refractory asthma patients completing three BT sessions in our hospital from May 2016 to May 2019. Procedure details included recording delivery sites and those in BT. Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) scores and spirometric measurements were recorded 1-day before treatment and 6 months post-treatment to explore the effects of BT activation number and site on clinical response.Results: ACQ score (3.19± 1.14 vs 1.26± 0.63), forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1)% predicted (55.53± 21.66 vs 66.19± 22.50), FEV1 (1.53± 0.74 vs 1.93± 0.82), and forced vital capacity (FVC) (2.49± 0.86 vs 2.92± 0.94) significantly increased after three BT sessions compared with pre-session. Major bronchial ablation did not significantly improve BT response in asthma patients. Multivariate logistic regression identified baseline ACQ score and baseline FEV1% predicted as independent factors affecting the clinical response to BT. Correlation and regression analysis revealed a significant linear relationship between baseline ACQ and ACQ improvement, as well as a linear relationship between the third session activation number and ACQ improvement. Based on subgroup analysis of activation number, cohort C (activations ≥ 200) had better lung function, lower non-responding rate, and better long-term effectiveness than the other two cohorts. The activation number in the third BT session showed the strongest predictive ability compared with the first two sessions.Conclusion: Main bronchial ablation did not markedly affect clinical response to BT. Baseline ACQ and baseline FEV1% predicted were independent factors affecting clinical response to BT. Increasing the activation number might promote the therapeutic efficacy of BT, and the activation number in the third BT session correlated with and predicted the BT response.Keywords: refractory asthma, bronchial thermoplasty, activation, response, correlation

Background: The effects of bronchial thermoplasty (BT) on smooth muscle (SM) and nerves in small airways are unclear. Methods: We recruited 15 patients with severe refractory asthma, who received BT treatment. Endobronchial optical-coherence tomography (EB-OCT) was performed at baseline, 3 weeks' follow-up and 2 years' follow-up to evaluate the effect of BT on airway structure. In addition, we divided 12 healthy beagles into a sham group and a BT group, the latter receiving BT on large airways (inner diameter >3 mm) of the lower lobe. The dogs’ lung lobes were resected to evaluate histological and neuronal changes of the treated large airways and untreated small airways 12 weeks after BT. Results: Patients receiving BT treatment had significant improvement in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) scores and significant reduction in asthma exacerbations. EB-OCT results demonstrated a notable increase in inner-airway area (Ai) and decrease in airway wall area percentage (Aw%) in both large (3rd-to 6th-generation) and small (7th-to 9th-generation) airways. Furthermore, the animal study showed a significant reduction in the amount of SM in BT-treated large airways but not in untreated small airways. Protein gene product 9.5 (PGP9.5)–positive nerves and muscarinic receptor 3 (M3 receptor) expression in large and small airways were both markedly decreased throughout the airway wall 12 weeks after BT treatment. Conclusions: BT significantly reduced nerves, but not SM, in small airways, which might shed light on the mechanism of lung denervation by BT.

Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is effective in some severe asthma patients; however, the specific asthma phenotypes that produce a good response to BT are not fully understood. Clinical data were retrospectively reviewed in severe asthma patients who underwent BT at a single institution in Japan. At the follow-up assessment, the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores (P = 0.003), maintenance oral corticosteroid doses (P = 0.027), and exacerbation frequency (P = 0.017) were significantly improved, while prebronchodilator-forced expiratory volume in 1 second (% predicted) did not significantly change (P = 0.19). When we grouped the patients into 2 groups according to their body mass index levels, the AQLQ scores were more improved in patients with overweight/obesity than those with normal weight (P = 0.01). This study showed that patients with non-controlled severe asthma exhibiting overweight/obesity and low quality of life had potential benefits from BT.

Asthma is a highly prevalent but heterogenous condition. Uncontrolled disease is relatively common and may be due to ongoing inflammation and/or persisting bronchial hyper-reactivity. Bronchial thermoplasty has been in use for many years but optimal case selection and post-procedure assessment remain uncertain. We present a case of a gentleman in his 50s with lifelong asthma who experienced a persistent loss of control following influenza A in 2017. Despite multidisciplinary assessment and guideline-based escalation of therapy, he had persisting symptoms. In the context of his atopy, he was trialled unsuccessfully on dupilumab. Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) was undertaken with good clinical benefit. Although his spirometry was little changed by BT, there was improvement in forced oscillometry technique (FOT) measurements. FOT may therefore be a useful addition to the assessment and monitoring of individuals considered for, or undergoing, BT., Competing Interests: None declared., (© 2024 The Author(s). Respirology Case Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.)

Abstract Background Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a novel endoscopic therapy for severe asthma. Traditionally it is performed in three separate treatment sessions, targeting different portions of the lung, and each requires an anaesthetic and hospital admission. Compression of treatment into 2 sessions would present a more convenient alternative for patients. In this prospective observational study, the safety of compressing BT into two treatment sessions was compared with the traditional 3 treatment approach. Methods Sixteen patients meeting ERS/ATS criteria for severe asthma consented to participate in an accelerated treatment schedule (ABT), which treated the whole left lung followed by the right lung four weeks later. The short-term outcomes of these patients were compared with 37 patients treated with conventional BT scheduling (CBT). The outcome measures used to assess safety were (1) the requirement to remain in hospital beyond the electively planned 24-h admission and (2) the need for re-admission for any cause within of 30 days of treatment. Results The total number of radiofrequency activations delivered in the ABT group was similar to CBT (187 ± 21 vs 176 ± 40, p = 0.326). With ABT, 11 in 31 admissions (37.9%) required prolonged admission due to wheezing, compared to 5.4% with CBT (p = 0.0025). The mean hospital length of stay with ABT was 1.8 ± 1.3 days, compared to 1.1 ± 0.4 days (p

Since the publication of a sham‐controlled, randomized trial (AIR2) and subsequent marketing approval by the US Food and Drug Administration, we have significantly advanced our understanding of bronchial thermoplasty (BT)'s scientific basis, long‐term safety, clinical efficacy and cost‐effectiveness. In particular, the last 2 years have witnessed multiple research publications on several of these counts. In this review, we critically appraise our evolving understanding of BT's biologic underpinnings and clinical impact, offer an evidence‐based patient workflow guide for the busy pulmonologist and highlight both current challenges as well as potential solutions for the researcher and the clinician. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bronchial thermoplasty (B.T.) is a therapeutic bronchoscopic procedure in which controlled thermal energy is applied to the airway wall to decrease smooth muscle mass. Immediate complications of B.T. include acute exacerbation of bronchial asthma, upper and lower respiratory tract infection, hemoptysis, among others. Our study assessed these immediate adverse events and the changes in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1%) measured four hours after each procedure from baseline. The study also aimed to examine the number of activations during each cycle of treatment and its correlation to the corresponding change in FEV1% from baseline. A case-series analysis of 17 patients who underwent B.T. between 2014 and 2019 was done. Demographic, clinical characteristics, including pre and post-BT FEV1% measures, and the number of activations were obtained. Acute exacerbation of asthma was the commonest complication accounting for 33%, 57%, and 75% after BT1, BT2, and BT3, respectively. There was deterioration in FEV1% after each treatment phase, the most significant being in BT3. There was no correlation between the number of heat activations with the change in FEV1% from baseline. The number of activations in B.T. does not correlate with the immediate deterioration in FEV1%, although exacerbation of asthma is the commonest complication post-B.T. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Francesco Menzella,1 Matteo Fontana,1 Carla Galeone,1 Maria D’Amato,2 Giorgio Walter Canonica,3 Giulia Ghidoni,1 Silvia Capobelli,1 Chiara Scelfo,1 Anna Simonazzi,1 Chiara Catellani,1 Patrizia Ruggiero,1 Nicola Facciolongo1 1Pulmonology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Azienda USL di Reggio Emilia- IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, 42123, Italy; 2Department of Pulmonology, AO “Dei Colli” Federico II University, Naples, 80131, Italy; 3Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy - Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS - Rozzano, Milan, ItalyCorrespondence: Francesco MenzellaPulmonology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Azienda USL di Reggio Emilia- IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, 42123, ItalyEmail francesco.menzella@ausl.re.itBackground: The important progress made on asthma phenotyping encouraged the development of new therapeutic strategies, such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and bronchial thermoplasty (BT). The aim of this study is to compare patients diagnosed with severe refractory asthma (SRA) who are currently being treated with omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab or BT and to evaluate the efficacy of these treatments over a 12-month observation period.Methods: Overall, 199 consecutive patients with SRA were included. The cohort was selected referring to the eligibility criteria for all available biologics and BT.Results: Among 32 patients treated with benralizumab, we found a 16.7% reduction in hospitalizations, a 66.6% reduction in exacerbations (p = 0.0001) and the greater improvement in FEV1 (+ 37.4%, p < 0.0001). Among omalizumab group (54 patients), there was a 85.7% (p = 0.012) reduction in hospitalizations and a 88.8% (p < 0.0001) reduction in exacerbations. In the mepolizumab group (83 patients), we found a 89.5% (p = 0.02) reduction in hospitalizations and a 92.1% (p < 0.0001) reduction in exacerbations. BT subgroup (30 patients) showed a 93.7% (p = 0.001) reduction in hospitalizations and a 73.5% (p < 0.0001) reduction in exacerbations. The best results in terms of OCS sparing effect were obtained by BT (- 76%, p < 0.0001) and mepolizumab (- 90.2%, p = 0.002). Omalizumab showed the highest percentage of super responder patients.Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare all marketed mAbs with BT, ending in more comprehensive and applicable results to clinical practice. All biologics, to varying degrees, reduced hospitalizations, exacerbations, and OCS use. The starting point for patients in the BT group was worse regarding hospitalizations, exacerbations and OCS, but despite this, even this non-pharmacological option obtained positive results, comparable to biologics.Keywords: severe asthma, biologics, bronchial thermoplasty, oral corticosteroids, exacerbations

The literature review aimed to see the safety and efficacy of bronchial thermoplasty in patients with severe asthma. We searched the online database, PUBMED, using bronchial thermoplasty and asthma as the key words and including trials from 2007 to 2021. Our review found that bronchial thermoplasty reduces asthma-related hospitalizations, emergency room visits and asthma exacerbations with sustained benefits for 5–10 years. This came at the expense of increased asthma-related adverse events, most commonly during the 7 days immediately after the procedure. Adverse events from 6 weeks after procedure to up to 5 years were similar between the bronchial thermoplasty group and the medication-only group. Bronchial thermoplasty is a safe and efficacious treatment modality for patients with severe asthma.

Abstract Background Bronchial thermoplasty regulates structural abnormalities involved in airway narrowing in asthma. In the present study we aimed to investigate the effect of bronchial thermoplasty on histopathological bronchial structures in distinct asthma endotypes/phenotypes. Methods Endobronchial biopsies (n = 450) were collected from 30 patients with severe uncontrolled asthma before bronchial thermoplasty and after 3 sequential bronchial thermoplasties. Patients were classified based on blood eosinophils, atopy, allergy and smoke exposure. Tissue sections were assessed for histopathological parameters and expression of heat-shock proteins and glucocorticoid receptor. Proliferating cells were determined by Ki67-staining. Results In all patients, bronchial thermoplasty improved asthma control (p

Background: Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is an effective treatment in severe asthma. How to select patients who more likely benefit from BT is an unmet clinical need. Moreover, mechanisms of BT efficacy are still largely unknown. We sought to determine BT efficacy and to identify potential mechanisms of response. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated clinical outcomes in 27 patients with severe asthma: 13 with T2-high and 14 with T2-low endotype. Expression levels of 20 genes were compared by real-time PCR in bronchial biopsies performed at the third BT session versus baseline. Clinical response was measured based on Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score < 1.5, asthma exacerbations < 2, oral corticosteroids reduction of at least 50% at 12 months post-BT. Patients were classified as responders when they had at least 2 of 3 outcome measures. Results: 81% of patients were defined as responders. BT induced a reduction in alpha smooth muscle actin (ACTA2) and an increase in CD68, fibroblast activation protein-alpha (FAP), alpha-1 and alpha-2 type I collagen (COL1A1, COL1A2) gene expression in the majority of patients. A higher reduction in ubiquitin carboxy-terminal-hydrolase L1 (PGP9.5) mRNA correlated with a better response based on Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ). Lower changes in CD68 and FAP mRNAs correlated with a better response based on ACQ. Lower levels of occludin (OCLN), CD68, connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), higher levels of secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) and lower changes in CD68 and CTGF mRNAs were observed in patients who had less than 2 exacerbations post-BT. Lower levels of COL1A2 at baseline were observed in patients who had ACQ < 1.5 at 12 months post-BT. Conclusions: BT is effective irrespective of the asthma endotypes and seems associated with airway remodelling. Quantification of OCLN, CD68, CTGF, SLPI, COL1A2 mRNAs could be useful to identify patients with better results. Trial registration: The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee (Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia—Comitato Etico Area Vasta Nord of Emilia Romagna; protocol number: 2019/0014076) and all the patients provided written informed consent before participating in the study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease usually characterized by chronic airway inflammation, in which several phenotypes have been described, related to the age of onset, symptoms, inflammatory characteristics and treatment response. The identification of the inflammatory phenotype in asthma is very useful, since it allows for both the recognition of the asthmatic triggering factor as well as the optimization of treatment The paucigranulocytic phenotype of asthma (PGA) is characterized by sputum eosinophil levels <1–3% and sputum neutrophil levels < 60%. The precise characteristics and the pathobiology of PGA are not fully understood, and, in some cases, it seems to represent a previous eosinophilic phenotype with a good response to anti-inflammatory treatment. However, many patients with PGA remain uncontrolled and experience asthmatic symptoms and exacerbations, irrespective of the low grade of airway inflammation. This observation leads to the hypothesis that PGA might also be either a special phenotype driven by different kinds of cells, such as macrophages or mast cells, or a non-inflammatory phenotype with a low grade of eosinophilic inflammation. In this review, we aim to describe the special characteristics of PGA and the potential therapeutic interventions that could be offered to these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients' outcome data were analysed over time by case number as well as by splitting the cohort into half and comparing the first 25 patients with the second 25 patients. All patients underwent HRCT scanning as part of the initial baseline assessment, and patients considered to have radiological evidence of emphysema did not proceed to BT. Keywords: bronchial thermoplasty; bronchoscopy; severe asthma; surgical experience EN bronchial thermoplasty bronchoscopy severe asthma surgical experience 366 369 4 04/19/22 20220501 NES 220501 Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a novel bronchoscopic treatment which utilizes a radiofrequency catheter, deployed into distal airways, to induce atrophy in the hypertrophied airway smooth muscle layer-a characteristic feature of severe asthma.1 Randomized controlled trials and real-world clinical registries have demonstrated that BT reduces exacerbations, symptoms and medication dependence.2 However, BT is unsuccessful in 15%-30% of patients, and the reasons for these failures are unclear.3 Many surgical and bronchoscopic procedures (including endobronchial ultrasound) involve a learning curve, where outcomes improve with more procedures and experience.4 We assessed if there was an improvement in patient outcomes after BT with increased operator experience. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Bronchial thermoplasty is a device-based treatment for subjects ≥ 18 years of age with severe asthma poorly controlled with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonists. The Post-FDA Approval Clinical Trial Evaluating Bronchial Thermoplasty in Severe Persistent Asthma (PAS2) study collected data on patients with severe asthma undergoing this procedure.Research Question: What are the 5-year efficacy and safety results in patients with severe asthma who have undergone bronchial thermoplasty?Study Design and Methods: This was a prospective, open-label, observational, multicenter study conducted in the United States and Canada. Subjects 18 to 65 years of age who were taking inhaled corticosteroids ≥ 1,000 μg/d (beclomethasone or equivalent) and long-acting beta-agonists ≥ 80 μg/d (salmeterol or equivalent) were included. Severe exacerbations, hospitalization, ED visits, and medication usage were evaluated for the 12 months prior to and at years 1 through 5 posttreatment. Spirometry was evaluated at baseline and at years 1 through 5 posttreatment.Results: A total of 284 subjects were enrolled at 27 centers; 227 subjects (80%) completed 5 years of follow-up. By year 5 posttreatment, the proportion of subjects with severe exacerbations, ED visits, and hospitalizations was 42.7%, 7.9%, and 4.8%, respectively, compared with 77.8%, 29.4%, and 16.1% in the 12 months prior to treatment. The proportion of subjects on maintenance oral corticosteroids decreased from 19.4% at baseline to 9.7% at 5 years. Analyses of subgroups based on baseline clinical and biomarker characteristics revealed a statistically significant clinical improvement among all subgroups.Interpretation: Five years after treatment, subjects experienced decreases in severe exacerbations, hospitalizations, ED visits, and corticosteroid exposure. All subgroups demonstrated clinically significant improvement, suggesting that bronchial thermoplasty improves asthma control in different asthma phenotypes.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01350336; URL: www.Clinicaltrials: gov. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Severe asthma affects more than 250 million people and represents high healthcare costs. Bronchial thermoplasty is a relatively new technique in interventional pulmonology for managing this condition. The procedure is done under general anesthesia and the patients are mostly ASA II and III; therefore, the anesthesia plan must be safe. The purpose of the article is to describe the anesthetic technique used (general anesthesia and laryngeal mask) and the immediate and early complications of the procedure. Four patients were included, each undergoing three sessions. The complications during and immediately after the procedure, as well as the early complications (up to seven days post-procedure) that could have required hospital management were discussed. In three of the sessions at least one acute bronchospasm event presented, but only one patient required hospital admission for more than 24 hours. Experience suggests that thermoplasty may be safely conducted under general anesthesia and laryngeal mask. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The effects of bronchial thermoplasty (BT) on smooth muscle (SM) and nerves in small airways are unclear. We recruited 15 patients with severe refractory asthma, who received BT treatment. Endobronchial optical-coherence tomography (EB-OCT) was performed at baseline, 3 weeks' follow-up and 2 years' follow-up to evaluate the effect of BT on airway structure. In addition, we divided 12 healthy beagles into a sham group and a BT group, the latter receiving BT on large airways (inner diameter >3 mm) of the lower lobe. The dogs' lung lobes were resected to evaluate histological and neuronal changes of the treated large airways and untreated small airways 12 weeks after BT. Patients receiving BT treatment had significant improvement in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) scores and significant reduction in asthma exacerbations. EB-OCT results demonstrated a notable increase in inner-airway area (Ai) and decrease in airway wall area percentage (Aw%) in both large (3rd-to 6th-generation) and small (7th-to 9th-generation) airways. Furthermore, the animal study showed a significant reduction in the amount of SM in BT-treated large airways but not in untreated small airways. Protein gene product 9.5 (PGP9.5)–positive nerves and muscarinic receptor 3 (M3 receptor) expression in large and small airways were both markedly decreased throughout the airway wall 12 weeks after BT treatment. BT significantly reduced nerves, but not SM, in small airways, which might shed light on the mechanism of lung denervation by BT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Fungal infections are rarely reported as a complication of bronchial thermoplasty (BT) in patients without immunosuppressive comorbidity. Case presentation A 19-year-old woman college student was admitted to our hospital owing to uncontrolled severe asthma despite using the maximum dose of steroid inhalation. She experienced asthmatic attacks more frequently while cheerleading, which is an extracurricular activity. She received BT because she wanted to continue cheerleading. After the second BT session, she developed more sputum and cough. During the third session, white secretion and saccular bronchodilation appeared in the left lower bronchus. Aspergillus fumigatus was detected in the culture of the bronchial lavage sample, and saccular bronchodilation in the affected bronchus was observed on computed tomography (CT). Five months after the start of oral itraconazole, her subjective symptoms as well as her CT findings improved. Her asthma condition improved enough for the patient to continue cheerleading without exacerbation. Conclusions It is necessary to consider the possibility of respiratory tract infections including fungal infections after BT. Detailed observations of the entire bronchus and sample collection for microbial culture are highly recommended.

Abstract Background The mechanism for symptomatic improvement after bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is unclear, since spirometry reveals little or no change. In this study, the effects of BT on airway resistance were examined using two independent techniques. Methods Eighteen consecutive patients, with severe asthma (57.6 ± 14.2 years) were evaluated by spirometry and plethysmography at three time points: (i) baseline, (ii) left lung treated but right lung untreated and (iii) 6 weeks after both lungs were treated with BT. At each assessment, total and specific airway resistance (Raw, sRaw) were measured. High resolution CT scans were undertaken at the first two assessments, and measurements of lobar volume, airway volume and airway resistance were made. The Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) was administered at each assessment. Results The baseline ACQ score was 3.5 ± 0.9, and improved progressively to 1.8 ± 1.2 (p

Abstract Background Bronchial Thermoplasty (BT) is an endoscopic treatment for severe asthma using radiofrequency energy to target airway remodeling including smooth muscle. The correlation of pulmonary function tests and BT response are largely unknown. Forced Oscillation Technique (FOT) is an effort-independent technique to assess respiratory resistance (Rrs) by using pressure oscillations including small airways. Aim To investigate the effect of BT on pulmonary function, assessed by spirometry, bodyplethysmography and FOT and explore associations between pulmonary function parameters and BT treatment response. Methods Severe asthma patients recruited to the TASMA trial were analyzed in this observational cohort study. Spirometry, bodyplethysmography and FOT measurements were performed before and 6 months after BT. Asthma questionnaires (AQLQ/ACQ-6) were used to assess treatment response. Results Twenty-four patients were analyzed. AQLQ and ACQ improved significantly 6 months after BT (AQLQ 4.15 (±0.96) to 4.90 (±1.14) and ACQ 2.64 (±0.60) to 2.11 (±1.04), p = 0.004 and p = 0.02 respectively). Pulmonary function parameters remained stable. Improvement in FEV1 correlated with AQLQ change (r = 0.45 p = 0.03). Lower respiratory resistance (Rrs) at baseline (both 5 Hz and 19 Hz) significantly correlated to AQLQ improvement (r = − 0.52 and r = − 0.53 respectively, p = 0.01 (both)). Borderline significant correlations with ACQ improvement were found (r = 0.30 p = 0.16 for 5 Hz and r = 0.41 p = 0.05 for 19 Hz). Conclusion Pulmonary function remained stable after BT. Improvement in FEV1 correlated with asthma questionnaires improvement including AQLQ. Lower FOT-measured respiratory resistance at baseline was associated with favorable BT response, which might reflect targeting of larger airways with BT. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02225392; Registered 26 August 2014.

Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is an interventional bronchoscopic treatment for severe asthma. There is a need to define patient selection criteria to guide clinicians in offering the appropriate treatment options to patients with severe asthma. Methodology: An expert group formed this statement under the aegis of the Indian Chest Society. We performed a systematic search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to extract evidence on patient selection and the technical performance of BT. Results: The experts agreed that the appropriate selection of patients is crucial and proposed identification of the asthma phenotype, a screening algorithm, and inclusion/exclusion criteria for BT. In the presence of atypical clinical or chest radiograph features, there should be a low threshold for obtaining a thoracic computed tomography scan before BT. The patient should not have had an asthma exacerbation in the preceding two weeks from the day of the procedure. A 5-day course of glucocorticoid should be administered, beginning three days before the procedure day, and continued until the day following the procedure. General Anesthesia (total intravenous anesthesia with a neuromuscular blocker) provides ideal conditions for performing BT. A thin bronchoscope with a 2.0 mm working channel is preferable. An attempt should be made to deliver the maximum radiofrequency activations. Middle lobe treatment is not recommended. Following the procedure, overnight observation in the hospital, and a follow-up visit, a week following each treatment session, is desirable. Conclusion: This position statement provides practical guidance regarding patient selection and the technical performance of BT for severe asthma.

The role of anesthesiologist in nonoperating room procedures including pulmonary interventions is expanding. Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a minimally invasive bronchoscopic intervention for patients with severe asthma refractory to conventional pharmacotherapy. It involves the application of controlled radiofrequency thermal energy to large- and medium-sized airways. We report our experience for perioperative anesthetic management of patients scheduled for BT. Three patients with severe asthma were planned for BT under general anesthesia. After standard monitoring and intravenous cannula insertion, anesthesia was induced with propofol, fentanyl, and rocuronium after preoxygenation and maintained with propofol target-controlled infusion. The ventilation was controlled mechanically with I-gel used for airway management. The oxygen concentration was titrated to 40% or less at the time of thermal activation delivery. The procedure was performed using a thin bronchoscope inserted through the I-gel working port of the catheter mount. The procedures lasted for around 1 h. After completion of the procedure, the residual neuromuscular blockade was reversed, and I-gel was removed. BT requires three separate procedure sessions performed 2–3 weeks apart, and each session sequentially targets right lower lobe, left lower lobe, and bilateral upper lobes. The challenge involved in BT is due to the airway sharing between anesthesiologists and pulmonologists and anesthesia in a nonoperating room setting in patient with uncontrolled severe asthma. A meticulous preoperative evaluation, perioperative anesthetic plan, and periprocedural monitoring can reduce the complications.