Search

Background: In correlation with a growing body of evidence regarding nonoperative management for Achilles tendon rupture (ATR), studies from Europe and Canada have displayed a decreasing incidence in surgical management, which has not been noted in the United States. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the US trend in ATR repair volume. Methods: The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Part II Oral Examination Case List Database was used. All cases using Current Procedural Terminology codes for primary ATR repair were requested from the years 2006-2020. Total submitted Achilles repair volume, the number of candidates submitting an Achilles repair case, and the overall submitted case volume per examination year was analyzed. Poisson and linear regressions were used to determine statistically significant trends. Results: The total number of Achilles repair cases submitted for the ABOS Part II Oral Examination significantly increased from 2006 to 2011 and then decreased until 2020. Taking Achilles repair cases as a proportion of total orthopaedic cases submitted, the same trend was seen. The number of candidates submitting an Achilles repair case increased from 2006 to 2009 and then decreased until 2020. Foot and Ankle fellowship-trained candidates submitted an increasing number of ATR repair cases per candidate during the time period studied. Conclusion: This is the first study to demonstrate a decline in the volume of ATR repair in the United States. The decline in ATR repair volume seen in the ABOS Part II Case Lists does not match previously published US surgeon practice patterns but is not necessarily generalizable to beyond this period. Although the overall ATR repair volume in the ABOS Part II Case Lists is decreasing, we found Foot and Ankle fellowship-trained surgeons are operating on an increasing number of ATRs during their board collection period. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cost and compliance are 2 factors that can significantly affect the outcomes of non-operative and operative treatment of trigger finger (TF) and both may be influenced by social factors. The purpose of this study was to investigate socioeconomic disparities in the surgical treatment for TF. Methods: Adult patients (≥18 years old) were identified using International Classification of Diseases 9 and 10 Clinical Modification diagnostic codes for TF and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) procedural codes (CPT: 26055) in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database. Each diagnosis was linked to procedure data to determine which patients went on to have TF release. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the likelihood of receiving surgery. The variables included in the analysis were age, sex, race, social deprivation index (SDI), Charlson Comorbidity Index, and primary insurance type. A P -value <.05 was considered significant. Results: Of the 31 411 TF patients analyzed, 8941 (28.5%) underwent surgery. Logistic regression analysis showed higher odds of receiving surgery in females (odds ratio [OR]: 1.108) and those with workers compensation (OR: 1.7). Hispanic (OR: 0.541), Asian (OR: 0.419), African American (OR: 0.455), and Other race (OR: 0.45) had decreased odds of surgery. Medicaid (OR: 0.773), Medicare (OR: 0.841), and self-pay (OR: 0.515) reimbursement methods had reduced odds of receiving surgery. Higher social deprivation was associated with decreased odds of surgery (OR: 0.988). Conclusions: There are disparities in demographic characteristics among those who receive TF release for trigger finger related to race, primary insurance, and social deprivation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To characterize the volume dependence of both facilities and surgeons on postoperative complications after lumbar fusion and characterize the role of socioeconomic status. Adults who underwent lumbar fusion from 2011 to 2015 were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnostic codes for lumbar disc degeneration or spondylolisthesis and procedure codes for lumbar fusion in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database. Complications were compared across surgeon and facility volumes using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, controlling for patient demographic and clinical factors. Surgeon and facility volumes were compared between the lowest and highest 20%. Of the 26,211 patients identified with a lumbar fusion, 16,377 patients were treated at a high-volume or low-volume facility or by a high-volume or low-volume surgeon. Low-volume facilities had higher 3-month and 12-month rates of readmission, pneumonia, and cellulitis; lower 1-month, 3-month, and 12-month rates of deep vein thrombosis; and lower 1-month rates of wound complications. Low-volume surgeons had higher 1-month, 3-month, and 12-month rates of readmission, acute renal failure, surgical site infection, and wound complications; high 1-month and 3-month rates of urinary tract infection and pulmonary embolism; and a lower 12-month rate of revision. Patients who were treated by low-volume surgeons and had complications were more concentrated to ZIP codes with high social deprivation. Both high-volume facilities and high-volume surgeons show lower rates of complications and readmission. There are significant socioeconomic disparities regarding which patients can access high-volume surgeons. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of this study was to characterize the case volume dependence of both facilities and surgeons on morbidity and mortality after femoral shaft fracture (FSF) fixation., Methods: Adults who had an open or closed FSF between 2011 and 2015 were identified in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database. Claims were identified by International Classification of Disease-9, Clinical Modification diagnostic codes for a closed or open FSF and International Classification of Disease-9, Clinical Modification procedure codes for FSF fixation. Readmission, in-hospital mortality, and other adverse events were compared across surgeon and facility volumes using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, controlling for patient demographic and clinical factors. Surgeon and facility volumes were compared between the lowest and highest 20% to represent low-volume and high-volume surgeons/facilities., Results: Of 4,613 FSF patients identified, 2,824 patients were treated at a high or low-volume facility or by a high or low-volume surgeon. Most of the examined complications including readmission and in-hospital mortality showed no statistically significant differences. Low-volume facilities had a higher 1-month rate of pneumonia. Low-volume surgeons had a lower 3-month rate of pulmonary embolism., Conclusion: There is minimal difference in outcomes in relation to facility or surgeon case volume for FSF fixation. As a staple of orthopaedic trauma care, FSF fixation is a procedure that may not require specialized orthopaedic traumatologists at high-volume facilities., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Introduction: This study seeks to evaluate (1) the relationship between hospital and surgeon volumes of shoulder arthroplasty and complication rates and (2) patient demographics/socioeconomic factors that may affect access to high-volume shoulder arthroplasty care., Methods: Adults older than 40 years who underwent shoulder arthroplasty between 2011 and 2015 were identified in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database using International Classification of Disease 9/10 and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Medical/surgical complications were compared across surgeon and facility volumes. The effects of demographic factors were analyzed to determine the relationship between such factors and surgeon/facility volume in shoulder arthroplasty., Results: Seven thousand seven hundred eighty-five patients were included. Older, Hispanic/African American, socially deprived, nonprivately insured patients were more likely to be treated by low-volume facilities. Low-volume facilities had higher rates of readmission, urinary tract infection, renal failure, pneumonia, and cellulitis than high-volume facilities. Low-volume surgeons had patients with longer hospital lengths of stay., Discussion: Important differences in patient socioeconomic factors exist in access to high-volume surgical care in shoulder arthroplasty, with older, minority, and underinsured patients markedly more likely to receive care by low-volume surgeons and facilities. This may highlight an area of potential focus to improve access to high-volume care., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)