Search

Detecting mutations in the plasma of patients with solid tumors is becoming a valuable method of diagnosing and monitoring cancer. The TERT promoter is mutated at high frequencies in multiple cancer types, most commonly at positions -124 and -146 (designated C228T and C250T, respectively). Detection of these mutations has been challenging because of the high GC content of this region (approximately 80%). We describe development of novel probe-based droplet digital PCR assays that specifically detect and quantify these two mutations, along with the less common 242-243 CC>TT mutation, and demonstrate their application using human tumor and plasma samples from melanoma patients. Assay designs and running conditions were optimized using cancer cell line genomic DNAs with the C228T or C250T mutations. The limits of detection were 0.062% and 0.051% mutant allele fraction for the C228T and C250T assays, respectively. Concordance of 100% was observed between droplet digital PCR and sequencing-based orthogonal methods in the detection of TERT mutant DNA in 32 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded melanoma tumors. TERT(mutant) DNA was also identified in 21 of 27 plasma samples (78%) from patients with TERT(mutant) tumors, with plasma mutant allele fractions ranging from 0.06% to 15.3%. There were no false positives in plasma. These data demonstrate the potential of these assays to specifically detect and quantify TERT(mutant) DNA in tumors and plasma of cancer patients.

Mutational heterogeneity can contribute to therapeutic resistance in solid cancers. In melanoma, the frequencies of intertumoral and intratumoral heterogeneity are controversial. We examined mutational heterogeneity within individual patients with melanoma using multiplatform analysis of commonly mutated driver and nonpassenger genes. We analyzed paired primary and metastatic tumors from 60 patients and multiple metastatic tumors from 39 patients whose primary tumors were unavailable (n = 271 tumors). We used a combination of multiplex SNaPshot assays, Sanger sequencing, mutation-specific PCR, or droplet digital PCR to determine the presence of BRAFV600, NRASQ61, TERT–124C>T, and TERT–146C>T mutations. Mutations were detected in BRAF (39%), NRAS (21%), and/or TERT (78%). Thirteen patients had TERTmutant discordant tumors; seven of these had a single tumor with both TERT–124C>T and TERT–146C>T mutations present at different allele frequencies. Two patients had both BRAF and NRAS mutations; one had different tumors and the other had a single tumor with both mutations. One patient with a BRAFmutant primary lacked mutant BRAF in at least one of their metastases. Overall, we identified mutational heterogeneity in 18 of 99 patients (18%). These results suggest that some primary melanomas may be composed of subclones with differing mutational profiles. Such heterogeneity may be relevant to treatment responses and survival outcomes.

The detection of cell-free, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the blood of patients with solid tumors is often referred to as "liquid biopsy." ctDNA is particularly attractive as a candidate biomarker in the blood. It is relatively stable after blood collection, can be easily purified, and can be quantitatively measured with high sensitivity and specificity using advanced technologies. Current liquid biopsy research has focused on detecting and quantifying ctDNA to (1) diagnose and characterize mutations in a patient's cancer to help select the appropriate treatment; (2) predict clinical outcomes associated with different treatments; and (3) monitor the response and/or progression of a patient's disease. The diagnostic use of liquid biopsies is probably greatest in tumors where the difficulty and/or risk of obtaining a tissue specimen for molecular diagnostics is high (e.g., lung, colon). In metastatic melanoma, however, obtaining a tissue sample for molecular diagnostics is not typically a major obstacle to patient care plans; rather predicting treatment outcomes and monitoring a patient's disease course during therapy are considered the current priorities for this cancer type. In this chapter we describe an approach to the validation of ctDNA detection assays for melanoma, focusing primarily on analytical validation, and provide methods to guide the use of droplet digital PCR assays for measuring ctDNA levels in plasma samples.

The detection of cell-free, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the blood of patients with solid tumors is often referred to as "liquid biopsy." ctDNA is particularly attractive as a candidate biomarker in the blood. It is relatively stable after blood collection, can be easily purified, and can be quantitatively measured with high sensitivity and specificity using advanced technologies. Current liquid biopsy research has focused on detecting and quantifying ctDNA to (1) diagnose and characterize mutations in a patient's cancer to help select the appropriate treatment; (2) predict clinical outcomes associated with different treatments; and (3) monitor the response and/or progression of a patient's disease. The diagnostic use of liquid biopsies is probably greatest in tumors where the difficulty and/or risk of obtaining a tissue specimen for molecular diagnostics is high (e.g., lung, colon). In metastatic melanoma, however, obtaining a tissue sample for molecular diagnostics is not typically a major obstacle to patient care plans; rather predicting treatment outcomes and monitoring a patient's disease course during therapy are considered the current priorities for this cancer type. In this chapter we describe an approach to the validation of ctDNA detection assays for melanoma, focusing primarily on analytical validation, and provide methods to guide the use of droplet digital PCR assays for measuring ctDNA levels in plasma samples.

9510 Background: There are no validated blood-based biomarkers to monitor efficacy in pts with advanced melanoma. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is an established prognostic factor; however, it is not normally used to inform treatment decisions. ctDNA at baseline (BL) is associated with a poor prognosis in pts treated with BRAF inhibitors, but no studies have examined the association between serial changes in ctDNA and survival after BRAF and/or MEK inhibitor therapy. Methods: We measured BRAF V600E/K ctDNA at BL and wk 4 in plasma samples from a pooled population of pts with unresectable or metastatic melanoma treated with D or D+T in the phase 3 COMBI-d trial (NCT01584648). We used mutation-specific droplet digital PCR assays; ctDNA results were categorized as positive/negative (pos/neg) using an analytically validated detection threshold of 0.25 copies/mL. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed in all pts and by BL LDH level (> or < upper limit of normal). Results: BL ctDNA was detectable in 320/345 pts (92.7%) and was not associated with survival. Nearly all pts had a considerable drop in ctDNA after 4 wks of therapy; 201 pts had paired samples (BL and wk 4) and detectable ctDNA at BL. In 80/201 pts (40%) whose ctDNA changed from pos at BL to neg at wk 4, PFS and OS were prolonged vs in 121/201 (60%) whose ctDNA remained pos (median PFS, 12.9 [95% CI, 9.2-20.2] mo vs 7.1 [5.5-8.9] mo; HR, 0.55 [0.39-0.76]; P = .0003; median OS, 28.2 [20.5-48.8] mo vs 14.6 [11.8-18.7] mo; HR, 0.56 [0.40-0.79]; P = .0007). Undetectable ctDNA at wk 4 was associated with prolonged PFS and OS, especially in pts with high BL LDH (Table). Conclusions: Particularly in pts with high LDH, on-treatment ctDNA monitoring may be helpful for early identification of pts likely to benefit from D or D+T. All ctDNA Samples at Wk 4. Clinical trial information: NCT01584648. [Table: see text]

BackgroundMelanoma lacks validated blood-based biomarkers for monitoring and predicting treatment efficacy. Cell-free circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is a promising biomarker; however, various detection methods have been used, and, to date, no large studies have examined the association between serial changes in ctDNA and survival after BRAF, MEK, or BRAF plus MEK inhibitor therapy. We aimed to evaluate whether baseline ctDNA concentrations and kinetics could predict survival outcomes.MethodsIn this clinical validation study, we used analytically validated droplet digital PCR assays to measure BRAFV600-mutant ctDNA in pretreatment and on-treatment plasma samples from patients aged 18 years or older enrolled in two clinical trials. COMBI-d (NCT01584648) was a double-blind, randomised phase 3 study of dabrafenib plus trametinib versus dabrafenib plus placebo in previously untreated patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma. Patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. COMBI-MB (NCT02039947) was an open-label, non-randomised, phase 2 study evaluating dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive metastatic melanoma and brain metastases. Patients in cohort A of COMBI-MB had asymptomatic brain metastases, no previous local brain-directed therapy, and an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. Biomarker analysis was a prespecified exploratory endpoint in both trials and performed in the intention-to-treat populations in COMBI-d and COMBI-MB. We investigated the association between mutant copy number (baseline or week 4 or zero conversion status) and efficacy endpoints (progression-free survival, overall survival, and best overall response). We used Cox models, Kaplan-Meier plots, and log-rank tests to explore the association of pretreatment ctDNA concentrations with progression-free survival and overall survival. The effect of additional prognostic variables such as lactate dehydrogenase was also investigated in addition to the mutant copy number.FindingsIn COMBI-d, pretreatment plasma samples were available from 345 (82%) of 423 patients and on-treatment (week 4) plasma samples were available from 224 (53%) of 423 patients. In cohort A of COMBI-MB, pretreatment and on-treatment samples were available from 38 (50%) of 76 patients with intracranial and extracranial metastatic melanoma. ctDNA was detected in pretreatment samples from 320 (93%) of 345 patients (COMBI-d) and 34 (89%) of 38 patients (COMBI-MB). When assessed as a continuous variable, elevated baseline BRAFV600 mutation-positive ctDNA concentration was associated with worse overall survival outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 1·13 [95% CI 1·09-1·18], p

Introduction: Serial monitoring of sensitive and specific blood-based biomarkers of disease burden in cancer patients could enable clinicians to adjust treatments at the earliest signs of disease progression when the likelihood of improved outcomes is probably greatest. Such assays require preanalytical, analytical, and clinical validation prior to use. We conducted analytical validation studies of 7 droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assays to determine their performance characteristics in detecting mutant TERT, BRAF, and NRAS ctDNA. Methods: Probe-based ddPCR assays (Bio-Rad) detecting BRAF V600E, K, NRAS Q61K, R, L, and TERT C228T, C250T were studied. Preanalytical validation experiments using plasma collected in EDTA tubes investigated processing variables including plasma volumes, centrifugation speeds, and DNA extraction efficiencies, and evaluated the necessity of internal controls using spike-in experiments. Analytical validation studies assessed accuracy using plasma from healthy donors spiked with known amounts of mutant nucleosomal DNAs from control cell lines. Potentially interfering substances were evaluated using the AcroMetrix inhibition panel (Thermo Scientific). Precision/reproducibility was assessed using combinations of multiple reagent lots and operators. Assay specificity was determined using templates with different mutations to check cross-reactivity. Limits of Blank (LoB) and Limits of Detection (LoD) were calculated for each assay using 8 replicate wells of healthy donor plasma or mutant cell line DNA, respectively. Three-phase inter-laboratory harmonization was conducted using: 1) extracted DNA, 2) plasmas spiked with control DNAs, and 3) melanoma patient samples shipped in PAXgene Blood ccfDNA tubes (Qiagen). Results: Preanalytical validation yielded a double centrifugation protocol to reduce contaminating large DNA. Assays were highly accurate and precise with 80-90% recovery of spiked-in mutant templates and coefficients of variation (CVs) Conclusion: This ddPCR-based plasma analysis platform demonstrates low background levels in normal plasma, yielding high sensitivities to detect small amounts of ctDNAs with these mutations. The assays also demonstrate highly reproducible results between laboratories. These assays could be integrated into biomarker-driven clinical trials to evaluate their potential to inform more personalized clinical decision-making. Citation Format: Mahrukh M. Syeda, Broderick Corless, Iman Osman, Cindy Spittle, George Karlin-Neumann, David Polsky. Analytical validation of 7 droplet digital PCR assays detecting TERT, BRAF, and NRAS hotspot mutations in plasma-derived circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Liquid Biopsies; Jan 13-16, 2020; Miami, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(11_Suppl):Abstract nr A66.

Introduction: Liquid biopsies, especially plasma cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), provide a potential opportunity to be a noninvasive biomarker for the diagnosis and monitoring of glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Previously, we detected TERT promoter hotspot mutations (C228T and C250T) in ctDNA of IDH wild-type (IDHwt) TERT promoter mutant GBM patients with 100% specificity using mutation-specific droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assays. Here, we examine the association between mutant TERT ctDNA levels and clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed GBM patients undergoing chemoradiation. Methods: We analyzed 76 serially collected plasma samples from 17 patients with suspected IDHwt GBM based on MRI before surgery. Twenty mL of whole blood was collected in EDTA tubes at predetermined times: pre- and postoperatively, at the end of chemoradiation, and 1, 3, and 6 months from the end of chemoradiation. TERT promoter mutations C228T or C250T were identified in FFPE tumor samples using ddPCR assays specific for these mutations. Plasma samples were analyzed for the patient’s tumor TERT mutation using the ddPCR assays. The analytically validated thresholds for positive ctDNA detection were 1.5 and 1.7 copies/mL for C228T and C250T, respectively. Results: Sixteen of 17 (94%) IDHwt tumors had TERT mutations (10 C228T, 6 C250T) with MGMT methylated, unmethylated, or unknown status in 10, 5, and 1, respectively. Fourteen of the 16 patients (87.5%) had detectable mutant ctDNA at one or more time points (range 1.66 to 22.13 copies/mL). Of the 2 patients with undetectable ctDNA, one had diffuse and non-avidly enhancing disease and the other only had pre/postop plasma samples collected. Six patients had detectable ctDNA preop, and most had a dominant rim-enhancing mass with additional nonenhancing or enhancing lesion(s). Ten patients had detectable ctDNA up to 4 days postop, half of whom had undergone gross total resection. For 3 of 5 patients for whom there was a question of pseudoprogression versus true progression, ctDNA kinetics matched the clinical outcome. One patient with MGMT unmethylated multifocal GBM achieved ctDNA zeroconversion at 6 months post radiation (RT), and did not progress for another five months. Another patient was negative at all time points until their 3-month post RT follow-up, at which time they developed a recurrence. Another patient achieved zeroconversion at the end of RT but developed a borderline positive ctDNA at 6 months after RT, 2 months before documented radiographic progression. Conclusions: In this pilot, prospective ctDNA monitoring study of IDHwt GBM, TERT mutant ctDNA was detected at one or more time points in the majority of patients. ctDNA kinetics were associated with clinical outcomes for some patients. These data suggest that additional, larger studies could refine how ctDNA monitoring may be used to enhance the clinical management of IDHwt GBM patients. Citation Format: Christine Cordova, Mahrukh M. Syeda, Broderick Corless, Jennifer M. Wiggins, Amie Patel, Sylvia C. Kurz, Malcolm Delara, Zacharia Sawaged, Minerva Utate, Dimitris Placantonakis, John Golfinos, Jessica Schafrick, Joshua S. Silverman, Rajan Jain, Matija Snuderl, David Zagzag, George Karlin-Neumann, David Polsky, Andrew S. Chi. Longitudinal detection of TERT-mutant plasma cell-free circulating tumor DNA in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Liquid Biopsies; Jan 13-16, 2020; Miami, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(11_Suppl):Abstract nr A65.

Purpose: The mutational spectra of melanoma has been well characterized; however, the presence of distinct subclones among multiple tumors from a given patient has been less well described. As mutational heterogeneity has been associated with decreased responses to treatments in other cancers, we sought to estimate the occurrence of distinct subclones within individual melanoma patients by analyzing commonly mutated melanoma genes using a multi-platform mutation-detection approach. Methods: We analyzed 271 formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tumors from 99 patients with stage III or IV melanoma enrolled in the NYU Melanoma Biorepository. All patients had two or more available tumor specimens, and complete clinical data. All samples were reviewed for adequate tumor content, and extracted DNA was assessed for mutations at BRAFV600, NRASQ61, and TERT-124C>T and TERT-146C>T using a combination of multiplex SNaPshot assays, Sanger Sequencing, Allele-specific real-time PCR, or droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Samples undergoing ddPCR analysis for TERT mutations were treated with uracil-DNA glycolase prior to amplification to remove C>T artifacts from formalin-fixation. Results: Sixty patients had a primary plus one or more metastatic tumors available; 39 patients had multiple metastatic tumors, but no primary tumor available. Overall, 88% of patients had tumors with at least one BRAF, NRAS and/or TERT mutation. We identified inter-tumor mutational heterogeneity in 20/99 (20%) patients, with TERT mutational heterogeneity present in 15 of these patients. Among 14 patients with heterogeneity between their primary and metastatic tumors, 6/14 (43%) had additional mutations in their metastases compared to their primaries. Most interestingly, 8/14 (57%) patients had mutations in their primary that were undetectable in at least one of their metastases; 5 of these patients had TERT mutational heterogeneity. Three patients had a BRAF mutation in their primary that was undetectable in at least 1 of their metastases. One patient had a BRAFV600E/NRASWILD-TYPE/TERTWILD-TYPE primary on the leg and 3 regional metastases lacking BRAF mutations; but carrying NRASQ61K and TERT-124C>T mutations. Another patient had 3 different metastatic tumors, with 3 different mutational spectra. We did not detect any tumors with simultaneous BRAF and NRAS mutations; however, we did detect both TERT-124C>T and TERT-146C>T mutations in 7 tumors from 7 individual patients. Four of these were primary tumors, and metastases from these patients lacked 1 of the 2 TERT mutations identified in the primary. Conclusion: Clonal heterogeneity in melanoma is fairly common as evidenced by divergent detection of TERT, BRAF and NRAS mutations using high sensitivity multi-platform mutation detection analyses of multiple melanoma tumors from individual patients. Heterogeneity appears to occur in primary tumors. Citation Format: Gregory Chang, Broderick Corless, Nathaniel Fleming, Cindy Spittle, Farbod Darvishian, Anna Pavlick, Russell Berman, Richard Shapiro, George Karlin-Neumann, Iman Osman, David Polsky. Identification of melanoma mutational tumor heterogeneity using BRAF, NRAS and TERT-promoter mutation-detection assays [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4704.

2026 Background: There is a critical need for more specific and less invasive diagnostic and pharmacodynamic biomarkers in glioblastoma (GBM) patients (pts). Previously, we detected TERT promoter hotspot mutations (C228T and C250T) in the ctDNA of IDH wildtype ( IDHwt) TERT promoter mutant GBM pts with 100% specificity using mutation-specific droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assays. Here, we explored the dynamics and clinical associations of mutant TERT ctDNA levels in GBM pts undergoing therapy. Methods: We examined 14 pts with suspected IDHwt GBM based on preoperative MRI. Plasma was isolated and frozen from ~15 mL whole blood samples collected pre- and post-op, at end of radiation (RT), and 1, 3, and 6 m after end of RT. TERT promoter mutations were identified in FFPE tumor samples using ddPCR assays for C228T/C250T. Plasma samples were analyzed using ddPCR assays specific for the corresponding tumor mutation. The validated thresholds for positive detection were 1.5 (C228T) and 1.7 copies/mL (C250T). Results: 13/14 (92.9%) IDHwt tumors had TERT mutations (7 C228T and 6 C250T). Six of these 13 (46%) pts had positive plasma TERT ctDNA preop (4 C228T, 2 C250T). The mean cross sectional area of enhancing disease at presentation for positive or negative preop mutant ctDNA was similar. All 4 pts with multiple contrast enhancing lesions had positive preop mutant ctDNA. 2 pts who were negative initially developed detectable mutant ctDNA preceding progression. 3/4 pts with equivocal radiographic pseudoprogression had ctDNA dynamics that correlated with eventual clinical outcome. One patient with unresectable GBM had declining mutant ctDNA in later collections during clinical stability. Conclusions: We detected plasma TERT ctDNA in 46% of TERT mutant GBM pts before surgery, and in 100% of pts with multiple contrast enhancing lesions. TERT mutant ctDNA levels correlated with pseudoprogression or true disease progression and predicted progression before MRI. These data suggest that larger studies to test circulating cell-free TERT mutation as a diagnostic and pharmacodynamic biomarker in GBM are warranted.

Purpose Melanoma patients with BRAFmutant tumors often develop resistance to BRAF-inhibitor therapies. Co-occurring mutations, present at the time of treatment initiation, have been identified in patients with primary treatment resistance, and NRAS mutations have been associated with secondary resistance. We tested the ability of multiplex mutation detection assays to identify possible co-occurring and resistance mutations in cell-free, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patients undergoing treatment with BRAF-targeted therapies. Methods Purified ctDNA samples remaining from a previous longitudinal study of metastatic melanoma patients, which measured BRAFmutant and NRASmutant ctDNA using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) duplex assays, were used for this study. Twelve samples from 6 patients with BRAF V600E mutant (V600E) tumors, who were receiving BRAF-inhibitor therapy, were separately analyzed in different laboratories using the two different multiplex assays (Oncomine and OnTarget). Oncomine used approximately 20ng DNA; OnTarget used approximately 30ng DNA. Patient samples were chosen based on clinical response or disease progression at the time of blood draw. Results Ten of 12 samples had V600E ctDNA detected by ddPCR. The On-Target detected V600E in 9/10 samples; the Oncomine detected V600E in 8/9 samples (1 sample was not analyzed due to limited sample availability). The 1 sample with a ddPCR detected mutation that was not detected by either OnTarget or Oncomine had a 0.01% fractional abundance, which is below the detection limit of these multiplex assays. Neither assay detected V600E DNA when it was not detected by ddPCR. One patient had 2 samples with a co-occurring p53 (R273H) mutation detected by OnTarget and Oncomine. This mutation was present at the time of partial response, and at disease progression with an associated increased fractional abundance as determined by both assays. The OnTarget detected NRASmtant ctDNA (Q61K x 2, Q61H x1) in 3 of the V600E samples; the Oncomine detected the Q61K in 1 of these 2 samples (the third sample was not analyzed as noted above). The NRAS mutations arose at times of disease progression. Oncomine also detected additional p53, GNAS, and FBXW7 mutations at generally low fractional abundances that were not detected by OnTarget. Conclusion Co-occurring and potential resistance mutations are detectable in the plasma of metastatic melanoma patients using OnTarget or Oncomine assays. The assays demonstrate high sensitivity, as evidenced by their ability to identify V600E ctDNA. These findings suggest that studies analyzing patient ctDNA for resistance mutations while they are undergoing treatment are feasible. Results of such studies may eventually help inform treatment choices, such as switching therapies when resistance mutations emerge. Citation Format: Broderick Corless, Greg Chang, Weihua Liu, Jin Li, Andre Marziali, Laura Mai, Matthew Wiggin, Melissa Wilson, Anna Pavlick, Iman Osman, George Karlin-Neumann, Cindy Spittle, David Polsky. Detection of co-occurring and potential resistance mutations in cell-free, circulating tumor DNA from patients with BRAFmutant metastatic melanoma undergoing treatment with BRAF-targeted therapies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5531.

Purpose: Our goal is to develop response predictive biomarkers for melanoma patients that are more sensitive than standard measures of disease activity. TERT promoter mutations occur frequently in many cancers, especially melanoma. We developed droplet digital PCR assays that detect the 2 most frequently occurring TERT promoter mutations, C228T and C250T. We previously demonstrated that these assays could detect TERTmutant cell-free, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the plasma of metastatic melanoma patients. In the current study we sought to compare the clinical sensitivity and specificity of these blood-based assays to the current blood biomarker, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), in detecting the presence of metastatic melanoma and disease progression among patients with unresectable Stage III/IV disease. Methods: We analyzed 71 patients' tumors with unresectable stage III/IV metastatic melanoma undergoing treatment with immuno-oncology therapies, prospectively acquired by the NYU Interdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group. TERT mutations were identified in tumors using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) or SNaPShot assays (prior to the development of the ddPCR assays). Patients with TERT mutant tumors were selected for further study based on the availability of serial blood collections and radiographic scan data. ddPCR assays used to analyze ctDNA from these patients were chosen based on the tumor mutation detected. Plasmas used for ctDNA analysis ranged from 1-5 mL (73% having at least 4 mL). The ctDNA results were compared with LDH levels and disease status based on radiographic scans and clinical notes. Results: We identified TERT mutations in 31/71 (44%) tumors (18/31 C228T and 13/31 C250T). Our final data set consisted of 26 patients with 85 plasmas. Among patients with available pretreatment samples, ctDNA and LDH were elevated in 14/24 (58%) and 5/24 (21%) patients, respectively (p-value=0.012, McNemar exact test). Among patients whose disease progressed, ctDNA and LDH were elevated at the time of progression in 11/16 (69%) and 4/16 (25%) patients, respectively (p=0.039). Among the patients who had either a complete response (n=2), partial response (n=3), or stable disease (n=3), 1/8 had a slightly elevated ctDNA (3.8 copies/mL with normal level Conclusion: These data demonstrate that ddPCR assays detecting TERT C228T or C250T mutations in ctDNA of metastatic melanoma patients have a greater sensitivity to detect the presence of metastatic disease and disease progression than the currently used standard, LDH. Citation Format: Mahrukh M. Syeda, Broderick Corless, Melissa Wilson, Yesung Lee, Jeremy Tchack, Todd Wechter, Una Moran, George Karlin-Neumann, Anna C. Pavlick, Iman Osman, Yongzhao Shao, David Polsky. Analysis of TERTmutant circulating tumor DNA as a potential biomarker of disease activity in patients with unresectable stage III/IV melanoma receiving immuno-oncology therapies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5534.

Purpose: Detecting mutations in the plasma of patients with solid tumors is becoming a valuable method of diagnosing and monitoring cancer. Mutations in 1 of 2 hot spots in the TERT promoter sequence are found in several cancers, including up to 85% of melanomas and the majority of cases that lack BRAF or NRAS mutations (about one-third of melanomas). Due to the high G-C content of the TERT promoter sequence these mutations can be difficult to detect using NGS approaches. We developed novel droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assays to detect these 2 mutations with high sensitivity and specificity, and demonstrate the application of these assays in melanoma clinical samples. Methods: Assays were optimized using cell lines with Sanger sequencing-confirmed mutations: glioblastoma A172 (C228T), and melanoma NYU12-126 (C250T). We varied assay designs and amplification conditions to optimize probe-based detection using the Bio-Rad QX-200 ddPCR system. Assay sensitivities and specificities at various DNA input levels were determined using serial dilutions with 3 replicate wells for each condition. Sensitivity is defined as the lowest mutant allele dilution for which the confidence interval did not overlap with that of the 0% mutant wells. We used normal and cancer-derived DNA sources of different quality (e.g. normal human DNA (Promega), cancer cell lines, plasma and FFPE-derived DNAs) with and without the mutations, and compared the efficiency of detection of amplicons of 88, 113 and 163 base-pairs. We compared efficiencies to assays of similar size for RPP30, a housekeeping gene. Patient-matched metastatic melanoma tumors and plasma samples were analyzed to explore the clinical utility of these assays. Results: The assays showed greater sensitivity when higher amounts of DNA were analyzed. For C228T the limit of detection (LOD) of the mutant allele was 1%, 0.25% and 0.1% for 6.6ng/well, 33ng/well and 66ng/well respectively; for C250T the LODs were 0.25%, 0.05% and 0.05% respectively. Using normal human DNA, the efficiency of the TERT assays averaged approximately 90% of that for RPP30 across assays of similar size, and no decrease in assay efficiency was observed as amplicon length increased. In contrast, whereas amplicon size had only a modest effect on assay efficiency in plasma cfDNA, it gave a more pronounced effect on FFPE DNA’s, decreasing to 38% for the 163bp amplicon. We observed 100% concordance between TERT mutation detection by SNaPshot and ddPCR in 10 FFPE tumor samples, and in plasma samples from 4 metastatic melanoma patients with matching tumor samples. Conclusion: We developed robust ddPCR assays to detect TERT promoter mutations with high sensitivity and specificity. Mutated TERT DNA can be detected and quantitated in the plasma of patients with metastatic melanoma, and is likely to be present in the plasma of other cancer patients in whom TERT mutations occur. Citation Format: Broderick Corless, Gregory Chang, Samantha Cooper, Mahrukh Syeda, Iman Osman, George Karlin-Neumann, David Polsky. Detection of TERT C228T and C250T promoter mutations in melanoma tumor and plasma samples using novel mutation-specific droplet digital PCR assays [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 743. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-743