Search

PDF file - 1.1MB, A, Chromosomal regions commonly amplified (red) and deleted (blue) in the SCPC/LCNEC (left panel) and adenocarcinoma (AdCa, right panel) xenografts. B, AR, cyclin D1, and RB1 promoter methylation of the AR-positive LNCaP prostate cancer cell line, the AR-negative PC-3 and DU145 prostate cancer cell lines, and the SCPC/LCNEC MDA PCa 144-4, 144-13, 146-10, and 155-2 xenografts. SCPC, small-cell prostate carcinoma; LCNEC, large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma; AR, androgen receptor; RB, retinoblastoma.

PDF file - 178K

PDF file - 150K, A: Mitotic figures in the xenografts; left panel: graphical presentation of the number of mitotic figures in SCPC/LCNEC xenografts (mean 11 mitoses per high power field) and adenocarcinoma xenografts (mean 2 per high power field); right panel: pictures from H&E stained slides of a SCPC and an adenocarcinoma (AdCa) xenograft. Arrows point to the mitotic figures. B: Higher expression levels of ki67 are noted in the SCPC/LCNEC xenografts and clinical samples compared to adenocarcinomas C:Flow cytometry of SCPC xenograft 146-10 and adenocarcinoma xenograft 180-30. (SCPC, small-cell prostate carcinoma; LCNEC, large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma).

PDF file - 270K, mRNA levels of A, CDC20 and B, FZR1/CDH1 in SCPC/LCNEC (MDA PCa 144-4, 144-13, 146-10, and 155-2) and adenocarcinoma (MDA PCa 170-4 and 180-30) xenografts, normalized to GAPDH. SCPC, small-cell prostate carcinoma; LCNEC, large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.

PDF file - 180K, A, Growth rate of MDA PCA 144-13, 146-10, 155-2, 170-4 and 180-30 xenografts. Note that the MDA PCA 144-13 xenograft line displays a large amount of necrosis. B. Diagram illustrates unsupervised hierarchal clustering using complete linkage and Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis of the raw expression profiles of androgen receptor-positive adenocarcinoma (MDA PCA 130, 117-9, 79) and androgen receptor-negative SCPC/LCNEC (MDA PCA 146-10, 155-2, 155-12, 144-13, 144-4) xenografts obtained with Affymetrix HGU133Plus2 array. In red are samples assessed on 1 day and in blue, those assessed on a different day. B, diagram illustrates Gene Ontology analysis results showing enrichment in biologic-process subtrees related to mitosis among the differently expressed genes. The biological processes that reached statistical significance are highlighted in red. SCPC, small-cell prostate carcinoma; LCNEC, large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Purpose: Small-cell prostate carcinoma (SCPC) morphology predicts for a distinct clinical behavior, resistance to androgen ablation, and frequent but short responses to chemotherapy. We sought to develop model systems that reflect human SCPC and can improve our understanding of its biology.Experimental Design: We developed a set of castration-resistant prostate carcinomas xenografts and examined their fidelity to their human tumors of origin. We compared the expression and genomic profiles of SCPC and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) xenografts to those of typical prostate adenocarcinoma xenografts. Results were validated immunohistochemically in a panel of 60 human tumors.Results: The reported SCPC and LCNEC xenografts retain high fidelity to their human tumors of origin and are characterized by a marked upregulation of UBE2C and other mitotic genes in the absence of androgen receptor (AR), retinoblastoma (RB1), and cyclin D1 (CCND1) expression. We confirmed these findings in a panel of samples of CRPC patients. In addition, array comparative genomic hybridization of the xenografts showed that the SCPC/LCNEC tumors display more copy number variations than the adenocarcinoma counterparts. Amplification of the UBE2C locus and microdeletions of RB1 were present in a subset, but none displayed AR nor CCND1 deletions. The AR, RB1, and CCND1 promoters showed no CpG methylation in the SCPC xenografts.Conclusion: Modeling human prostate carcinoma with xenografts allows in-depth and detailed studies of its underlying biology. The detailed clinical annotation of the donor tumors enables associations of anticipated relevance to be made. Future studies in the xenografts will address the functional significance of the findings. Clin Cancer Res; 18(3); 666–77. ©2011 AACR.

Purpose: Small-cell prostate carcinoma (SCPC) morphology predicts for a distinct clinical behavior, resistance to androgen ablation, and frequent but short responses to chemotherapy. We sought to develop model systems that reflect human SCPC and can improve our understanding of its biology. Experimental Design: We developed a set of castration-resistant prostate carcinomas xenografts and examined their fidelity to their human tumors of origin. We compared the expression and genomic profiles of SCPC and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) xenografts to those of typical prostate adenocarcinoma xenografts. Results were validated immunohistochemically in a panel of 60 human tumors. Results: The reported SCPC and LCNEC xenografts retain high fidelity to their human tumors of origin and are characterized by a marked upregulation of UBE2C and other mitotic genes in the absence of androgen receptor (AR), retinoblastoma (RB1), and cyclin D1 (CCND1) expression. We confirmed these findings in a panel of samples of CRPC patients. In addition, array comparative genomic hybridization of the xenografts showed that the SCPC/LCNEC tumors display more copy number variations than the adenocarcinoma counterparts. Amplification of the UBE2C locus and microdeletions of RB1 were present in a subset, but none displayed AR nor CCND1 deletions. The AR, RB1, and CCND1 promoters showed no CpG methylation in the SCPC xenografts. Conclusion: Modeling human prostate carcinoma with xenografts allows in-depth and detailed studies of its underlying biology. The detailed clinical annotation of the donor tumors enables associations of anticipated relevance to be made. Future studies in the xenografts will address the functional significance of the findings. Clin Cancer Res; 18(3); 666–77. ©2011 AACR.

Small cell prostate cancer (SCPC) is an androgen receptor (AR) negative variant that often emerges in the castration-resistant progression of typical AR-positive prostate adenocarcinomas. Its presence predicts for an aggressive clinical course with poor response to hormonal therapies and a short median survival. Evidence suggests that the emergence of (SCPC) occurs through cellular transdifferentiation. Therefore, we hypothesized that loss of AR gene transcription may depend on epigenetic events. Given the central role of AR in prostate cancer, we reasoned that identifying the mechanisms involved in its downregulation could improve our understanding of how the lethal SCPC subtype arises. Here we investigated the DNA methylation and histone modifications of AR in a group of six prostate tumor xenografts developed from men with CRPC (two AR-positive [MDA PCa 170.4 and MDA PCa 180.30] and four AR-negative SCPC [MDA PCa 144.13, MDA PCa 144.4, MDA PCa 155 and MDA PCa 146.10]) and three established prostate cancer cell lines (one AR-positive [LNCaP] and two AR-negative [PC3 and DU145]). We first evaluated the methylation status of selected CpG sites in the AR promoter-associated CpG island using bisulfite-sequencing followed by pyrosequencing analysis. Except for the cancer cell lines PC-3 and DU145, all other cell lines and xenografts were unmethylated regardless of the AR expression status. Next, we used chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to evaluate marking of the AR promoter and a putative proximal enhancer by active (H3K4me3 and H3K9ac) and repressive (H3K9me2 and H3K27me3) histone modifications. Marking of the constitutively expressed genes (ACTB and GAPDH) and a repressed gene (HBB) served as control for these experiments. As expected, the only samples with AR marking by H3K4me3 and H3K9ac were the two AR-positive xenografts and LNCaP. Marking by repressive histone modifications was more variable: H3K27me3 was a universal finding in AR-negative samples except for Du-145, and was accompanied by H3K9me2 in two out of four xenografts. H3K27me3 and H3K9me2 also marked the putative enhancer region when AR was repressed. Altogether, these data indicate that promoter DNA methylation of AR is an infrequent finding in prostate cancer, while polycomb protein-based silencing is nearly universal in AR-negative variants. Also, it shows that H3K9me2 promotes reinforcement of silencing. Thus, we propose that reactivation of AR may by achieved in selected cases by inhibiting H3K27me3 alone, while concomitant inhibition of both polycomb and SET domain proteins may be necessary for double-positive H3K27/K9 methylation cases. Given the purported differentiating and tumor suppressor effects of AR, its reactivation in SCPC may be of therapeutic benefit. Citation Format: Brittany N. Kleb, Marcos RH Estecio, Guanglin Wu, Jing-Fang Lu, Christopher J. Logothetis, Sankar Maity, Ana M. Aparicio. Mechanism of androgen receptor (AR) silencing in small cell prostate carcinoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2986. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-2986

Background: MLL3 is a histone 3- lysine 4 methyltransferase with tumor-suppressor properties that belongs to a family of chromatin regulator genes potentially altered in neoplasia. Mutations in MLL3 were found in a whole genome analysis of colorectal cancer but have not been confirmed by a separate study. Methods & Results: We analyzed mutations of the coding region and promoter methylation in MLL3 using 126 cases of colorectal cancer. We found two isoforms of MLL3 and DNA sequencing revealed frameshift and other mutations affecting both isoforms of MLL3 in colorectal cancer cell lines and 19 of 134 (14%) primary colorectal samples analyzed. Moreover, frameshift mutations were more common in cases with microsatellite instability (31%) both in CRC cell lines and primary tumors. The largest isoform of MLL3 is transcribed from a CpG island-associated promoter that has highly homology with a pseudo-gene on chromosome 22 (psiTPTE22). Using an assay which measured both loci simultaneously we found prominent age related methylation in normal colon (from 21% in individuals less than 25 years old to 56% in individuals older than 70, R=0.88, p Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4572. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-4572

Small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma belong to the spectrum of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECa) of the prostate, characterized by a distinct clinical course. Often unrecognized, they can emerge either de novo or in the castrate-resistant progression of typical acinar adenocarcinoma (AdCa) and are found in 10-20% of men who die of the disease. Although sensitive to chemotherapy, responses are short lived and prognosis is dismal. An understanding of the biology underlying NECa and identification of novel therapeutic targets for this variant are urgently needed. In this study we used xenograft models and tissue specimens obtained from castrate-resistant prostate carcinomas (CRPC) to gain insight into the pathways implicated in the development of the highly aggressive NECa. Xenograft models with features of typical AdCa (n=3) and NECa (n=4) were subjected to gene-expression profiling using Affymetrix HGU133 Plus 2.0. One-way ANOVA was applied to identify differentially expressed probes (DEPs). The Web-based Gene Ontology (GO) Tree Machine was used to examine GO hierarchies. Selected genes were validated by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and Western blotting in the xenografts and by immunohistochemistry in the xenografts, and the tumor specimens of 62 patients with CRPC. Unsupervised hierarchal clustering of the raw data classified the xenografts correctly according to their morphology. Using stringent FDR 0.05, we identified 140 DEPs (0.3%) between the two groups. GO analysis revealed significant enrichment in the “M phase of mitotic cell cycle” biological process subtree (adjP=7.04e-08). Amongst the genes differentially expressed between the two groups, UBE2C, (E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UBCH10), a member of the anaphase promoting complex (APC), was significantly upregulated in NECa relative to AdCa by qRT-PCR (P=0.003) and immunohistochemistry (P=0.007) in xenografts, and by immunohistochemistry in the CRPC specimens (P Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 36. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-36