Search

Background: It is unknown whether ChatGPT provides quality responses to infectious diseases (ID) pharmacotherapy questions. This study surveyed ID pharmacist subject matter experts (SMEs) to assess the quality of ChatGPT version 3.5 (GPT-3.5) responses., Methods: The primary outcome was the percentage of GPT-3.5 responses considered useful by SME rating. Secondary outcomes were SMEs' ratings of correctness, completeness, and safety. Rating definitions were based on literature review. One hundred ID pharmacotherapy questions were entered into GPT-3.5 without custom instructions or additional prompts, and responses were recorded. A 0-10 rating scale for correctness, completeness, and safety was developed and validated for interrater reliability. Continuous and categorical variables were assessed for interrater reliability via average measures intraclass correlation coefficient and Fleiss multirater kappa, respectively. SMEs' responses were compared by the Kruskal-Wallis test and chi-square test for continuous and categorical variables., Results: SMEs considered 41.8% of responses useful. Median (IQR) ratings for correctness, completeness, and safety were 7 (4-9), 5 (3-8), and 8 (4-10), respectively. The Fleiss multirater kappa for usefulness was 0.379 (95% CI, .317-.441) indicating fair agreement, and intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.820 (95% CI, .758-.870), 0.745 (95% CI, .656-.816), and 0.833 (95% CI, .775-.880) for correctness, completeness, and safety, indicating at least substantial agreement. No significant difference was observed among SME responses for percentage of responses considered useful., Conclusions: Fewer than 50% of GPT-3.5 responses were considered useful by SMEs. Responses were mostly considered correct and safe but were often incomplete, suggesting that GPT-3.5 responses may not replace an ID pharmacist's responses., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. J. M. S. served on an advisory board for Paratek Pharmaceuticals. E. B. C. served on an advisory board and speakers bureau for Seqirus. W. D. K. received research grants from Melinta, Merck & Co, and Shionogi, Inc and served on an advisory board for Theratechnologies, Inc. All other authors report no potential conflicts., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Purpose: To provide summarization of the most significant infectious diseases (ID) pharmacotherapy articles published in peer-reviewed literature in 2022. Summary: Members of the Houston Infectious Diseases Network (HIDN) nominated notable articles providing significant contributions to ID pharmacotherapy in 2022. Article nominations included those pertaining to general ID, as well as those including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) pharmacotherapy. A total of 71 articles were nominated by HIDN. Members: 68 articles pertaining to general ID pharmacotherapy and 3 articles focusing on HIV/AIDS. To aid selection of the most these most notable articles of 2022, a survey was created and distributed to members of the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP). Of the 153 SIDP members who participated in the survey, there were 128 recorded votes for the top 10 general ID pharmacotherapy articles and 30 votes recorded for the top HIV/AIDS article. The most notable publications are summarized. Conclusion: Post pandemic significant advances in antimicrobial stewardship and infectious disease states continues to occur in a world recently focused on the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic. Continuous growth in publication of ID-related articles over the past year lends towards the aims of this review to aid clinicians in remaining current on key practice-changing ID pharmacotherapy publications from 2022., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

A novel pharmacy residency rotation was created to meet the needs of patients enrolled in an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) program but not yet discharged from the inpatient setting. This service resulted in a high number of antimicrobial stewardship interventions identified and accepted by the primary team(s)., Competing Interests: R.S.B. reports travel support from the American College of Clinical Pharmacy. M.V.M. reports receiving grants from Merck; consulting fees from BD Biosciences, Cidara Therapeutics, Glaxo Smith Klein, Melinta Therapeutics, Merck, and Pfizer; honoraria from Paratek; travel support from the American College of Clinical Pharmacy, American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America; and the current President of the Massachusetts Society of Health-system Pharmacists. J.C.P. reports participating on advisory board for Shionogi and Gilead Sciences. All other authors report no relevant conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2023.)

Purpose: To provide a summary of the most prominent peer-reviewed infectious diseases (ID) pharmacotherapy and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-related articles published in 2019., Summary: Houston Infectious Diseases Network (HIDN) members were asked to nominate articles that they believed were most influential within the ID and HIV pharmacotherapy science communities. A total of 48 general ID and 6 HIV-related articles were nominated. Following nominations, an online survey was distributed via e-mail to Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP) members, with a total of 156 and 54 members voting for general ID and HIV-related articles, respectively. The results of this survey were ranked to determine the top 10 general ID and top HIV articles. The top articles were then summarized by HIDN members, including residents, fellows, and clinical pharmacists., Conclusion: This review covers many of the most influential ID articles published in 2019, including 3 practice guideline updates. Due to the high rate of ID literature published each year, this review continues to help summarize these articles for the ID community, allowing clinicians to remain up-to-date on practice-changing publications in ID and HIV pharmacotherapy.

Background: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) allows for long-course intravenous treatment of infections without lengthy hospital stays. Upon discharge, antimicrobial therapy may be broadened for "ease" of once-daily administration (EOA). Patients requiring subsequent readmission can be tailored to pre-OPAT regimens to minimize adverse effects. This study assessed continuation of EOA regimens upon hospital readmission during or immediately after OPAT., Methods: This was a retrospective review of adults enrolled in OPAT and discharged on ertapenem or daptomycin for EOA, defined by the terms "convenience" or "EOA" in OPAT notes or by switching to ertapenem or daptomycin upon OPAT enrollment despite adequate therapy with narrower-spectrum agents. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients readmitted during or after their OPAT course and maintained on an EOA regimen. Secondary outcomes included inpatient therapy cost, rates of Clostridioides difficile infection, and adverse events., Results: Of 188 patients receiving an OPAT EOA regimen, 71 were readmitted, representing 113 unique readmissions. Patients were mostly males (81%) aged 57 years. The EOA regimens were continued in 27% of hospital readmissions. The Infectious Diseases (ID) team was consulted in 48% of readmissions, and the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) intervened in 26%. Combined, this resulted in de-escalation in 28% of cases. Clostridioides difficile infections and adverse events occurred in 7% and 12% of readmissions, respectively. The median acquisition cost of inpatient EOA regimens was $150 per readmission., Conclusions: The OPAT EOA regimens were continued in 27% of hospital readmissions indicating a role for improved indication documentation and collaboration between ID services, ASPs, and OPAT teams., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Objectives : This study compared hospital readmission and mortality for patients with sepsis who received ceftaroline or daptomycin as first-line MRSA therapy. Methods : This retrospective comparative-effectiveness study included adults ≥18 years old hospitalized in the United States Veterans Health Care System with sepsis between 10/1/2010-9/30/2014, who received ceftaroline or daptomycin within 14 days of hospital admission as the first antibiotic effective against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Patients with pneumonia, and those who received both study drugs, were excluded. Baseline characteristics were compared using Chi-square, Fischer's exact, Student's t, and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests. Patient outcomes were compared with multivariable logistic regression models. Results : 409 patients were included (ceftaroline = 67, daptomycin = 342). Ceftaroline patients were older, less likely to be Black, more likely to have diabetes with complications, and had higher Charlson comorbidity scores. Median (interquartile range) time from admission to drug initiation was 1 (0-1) day for ceftaroline and 1 (1-3) day for daptomycin (p = 0.01). Unadjusted hospital readmission rates for ceftaroline and daptomycin, respectively, were: 30-day (25%/37%, p = 0.06), 60-day (27%/44%, p = 0.008), and 90-day (28%/46%, p = 0.01). Unadjusted mortality rates were: in-hospital (7%/12%, p = 0.4), 30-day (3%/9%, p = 0.1), 60-day (6%/12%, p = 0.2), and 90-day (7%/15%, p = 0.1). In multivariable models with all divergent baseline characteristics included as covariates, patients treated with ceftaroline were less likely to experience (OR, 95% CI): 30/60/90-day hospital readmission (0.54, 0.29-0.98; 0.42, 0.23-0.76; 0.42, 0.23-0.75) and 30/60/90-day mortality (0.23, 0.04-0.82; 0.34, 0.10-0.93; 0.34, 0.11-0.86). Conclusion : In patients with sepsis, ceftaroline was associated with fewer hospital readmissions and lower mortality as compared to daptomycin. Prospective investigations in larger, more generalized cohorts are needed to examine outcomes with specific MRSA therapies.

Background: Ceftaroline fosamil is US Food and Drug Administration-approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, but it is not known how ceftaroline is being used in real-world settings or how adverse effects (AEs) and mortality compare to clinical trials., Objective: This study describes ceftaroline use, AEs, and mortality in US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hospital patients., Methods: This phase IV, population-based, epidemiologic study analyzed patients ≥18 years old who received one or more ceftaroline doses within 14 days of admission to 69 VHA hospitals in 41 US states/territories from 1 October 2010 to 30 September 2014. VHA repository data were linked using unique patient identifiers. Diagnoses and AEs were determined using ICD9-CM and CSS codes. Demographics, AEs within 30 days of therapy initiation, and all-cause in-hospital mortality were summarized using descriptive statistics., Results: 764 Patients met study criteria. Patients were 97% male and 56% White, with a median age of 61 years and a Charlson score of 6. Diagnoses included skin (40%), sepsis (30%), osteomyelitis (25%), diabetic foot (22%), pneumonia (16%), bacteremia (11%), endocarditis (6%), meningitis (2%), and device (2%) infections. Ceftaroline was used first-line (37%), second-line (56%), and third-line or greater (7%). Patients received ceftaroline a median of 3 days after hospital admission. All-cause in-hospital mortality rates were: overall (5%), skin (2%), sepsis (9%), osteomyelitis (3%), diabetic foot (1%), pneumonia (13%), bacteremia (6%), endocarditis (11%), meningitis (6%), and device (13%). Eosinophilia, leukopenia, leukocytosis, fibromyalgia, myalgia and myositis, and polymyalgia rates were <1% each., Conclusions: Ceftaroline is used in VHA hospitals for various diagnoses. Mortality was low and comparable with rates from clinical trials. Additional studies comparing ceftaroline to other drugs used in similar situations are needed.

Study Objective: To assess the impact of empiric Pseudomonas pharmacotherapy on 30-day mortality in hospitalized patients with community-onset pneumonia stratified according to their risk (low, medium, or high) of drug-resistant pathogens., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Data Source: Veterans Health Administration database., Patients: A total of 50,119 patients who were at least 65 years of age, hospitalized with pneumonia, and received antibiotics within 48 hours of admission between fiscal years 2002 and 2007. Patients were stratified into empiric Pseudomonas therapy (31,027 patients) and no Pseudomonas therapy (19,092 patients) groups based on antibiotics received during their first 48 hours of admission., Measurements and Main Results: A clinical prediction scoring system developed in 2014 that stratifies patients with community-onset pneumonia according to their risk of drug-resistant pathogens was used to identify patients who were likely to benefit from empiric Pseudomonas therapy as well as those in whom antipseudomonal therapy could be spared; patients were classified into low-risk (68%), medium-risk (21%), and high-risk (11%) groups. Of the 50,119 patients, 62% received Pseudomonas therapy. All-cause 30-day mortality was the primary outcome. Empiric Pseudomonas therapy (adjusted odds ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.62-0.84) was associated with lower 30-day mortality in the high-risk group but not the low- or medium-risk groups., Conclusion: Application of a risk score for patients with drug-resistant pathogens can identify patients likely to benefit from empiric Pseudomonas therapy. Widespread use of this score could reduce overuse of anti-Pseudomonas antibiotics in low- to medium-risk patients and improve survival in high-risk patients., (© 2016 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.)