Search

Objective: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of deep lobe parotid tumors to evaluate their unique characteristics.Data Sources: PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Sciences, and Cochrane Library databases were queried for relevant literature.Review Methods: Studies were individually assessed by 2 independent reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane bias tool, GRADE criteria, and MINORS criteria. Results were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed by comparing rates of malignancy between deep and superficial lobe tumors.Results: In total, 8 studies including 379 deep lobe parotid tumors met inclusion criteria. Mean age at diagnosis was 44.9 years. Computed tomography scan was the most common imaging modality. Preoperative diagnostic fine-needle aspiration was utilized in 39.4% of patients and demonstrated high sensitivity for malignant disease. The most common approach was subtotal parotidectomy with facial nerve preservation (58.9%). The rate of malignancy was 26.6%, which was significantly higher than that of the superficial lobe tumors in this study (risk ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01-1.56). The rate of temporary postoperative facial nerve weakness between deep and superficial lobe tumors was 32.5% and 11.7%, respectively.Conclusion: Deep lobe parotid tumors had a 26.6% rate of malignancy. On meta-analysis, deep lobe tumors appeared to have higher rates of malignancy than superficial lobe tumors. Surgical excision of deep lobe tumors showed increased rates of temporary facial nerve paresis as compared with superficial lobe tumors. Computed tomography scan was the most common imaging modality. There were limited data regarding the utility of fine-needle aspiration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To better characterize parotid masses incidentally identified on imaging.Study Design: Case series with chart review.Setting: Academic medical center.Subjects and Methods: Medical records were reviewed for 771 patients who underwent parotidectomy at the University of Wisconsin from 1994 to 2013. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: those with tumors identified solely on imaging (parotid incidentalomas [PIs]) and those with palpable masses, pain, facial nerve dysfunction, or other reasons their mass was identified (nonincidentals [NIs]). A χ(2) test was employed to compare the prevalence of malignancy in PIs compared with NIs. Trend analysis was performed to determine the prevalence of PIs over the 20-year period.Results: Of the 771 patients, 67 (8.7%) had their mass discovered incidentally on imaging (PIs). There was a significant difference in the rate of malignancy in the NI (32.7%) compared with the PI group (6.0%) (P < .01). During the 1994 to 2003 time period, 4.0% of all parotoidectomies performed were for PIs, while during the second decade (2004-2013), this proportion increased to 10.2%. This represents a 155.0% increase in the percentage of parotidectomies carried out for PIs between these 2 periods.Conclusion: In this study, the rate of malignancy in PIs was significantly lower than the rate of malignancy in patients with NIs. The occurrence of PIs has increased over time and now represents greater than 10.0% of all parotidectomies performed at the University of Wisconsin. This information is important to consider when consenting a patient for resection of a PI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Importance: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is an otologic pathologic condition defined as a sensation of spinning triggered by changes in head position relative to gravity and caused by an entrapment of fragmented endolymph debris most commonly in the posterior semicircular canal. Confirmation of diagnosis requires experience with procedures that are poorly known by those other than practitioners with advanced otologic training. The complexity in the diagnosis of BPPV inspired the design of a questionnaire-based algorithm that would be useful for determining a vestibular diagnosis and treatment options., Objective: To assess a statistical algorithm for the diagnosis of BPPV in a busy tertiary care setting, with the long-term goal of implementing a clinical pathway to efficiently diagnose and treat patients with dizziness., Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective case series, 200 patients who visited the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine for their initial vertigo symptoms from September 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016, were assessed., Interventions: Use of a validated patient questionnaire as a tool to differentiate patients with dizziness in an electronic medical record review., Main Outcomes and Measures: Linear predictor (LP) value based on the questionnaire for the diagnosis of BPPV., Results: Of the 200 patient visits reviewed (132 [66%] female), 106 (53.0%; 68 [64%] female) had the information necessary to calculate the LP value and had a confirmed final diagnosis. On the basis of an LP value of 0.2 or greater, the sensitivity for a diagnosis of BPPV was 0.75 and the specificity was 1.0. The positive predictive value was 1.0, whereas the negative predictive value was 0.96. Patients with BPPV had a statistically significantly different LP value (odds ratio, 5.92; 95% CI, 2.73-12.83) than did patients without BPPV., Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that the algorithm is efficient for the diagnosis of BPPV in a clinical care setting.