Search

The administration of venetoclax (Ven) with azacitidine (Aza) was used as induction or salvage therapy for 34 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in our institute. An itraconazole oral solution (ITCZ-OS) was administered to 17 patients (50%) as antifungal prophylaxis. The trough concentration of Ven was significantly higher in patients treated with ITCZ than in those who were not (median values, 1.31 μg/mL vs. 0.64 μg/mL; p = 0.0072). Ven concentrations were > 3 μg/mL in some patients treated with ITCZ and the patient with the highest Ven concentration (5.58 μg/mL) expired after grade 4 neutropenia persisted for more than 50 days after the 1st cycle of Ven/Aza. It was also found that the group with concentrations equal to or above 1.29 μg/mL showed a significantly higher rate of achieving CR or CRi (p = 0.039). In conclusion, the measurement of Ven concentrations in AML cases is essential in daily clinical practice, particularly in those receiving antifungal prophylaxis., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Access to allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) remains challenging for older patients (aged >60 years) with acute myeloid leukaemia. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of venetoclax plus decitabine as first-line therapy and bridge to transplantation in this patient population., Methods: This multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial was conducted in 20 Gruppo Italiano Trapianto Midollo Osseo (GITMO) centres in Italy. Patients aged ≥60 and <75 years, with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia categorised as intermediate or high risk according to 2016 WHO and 2017 European LeukemiaNet, an ECOG performance status of less than 2, and considered fit for allogeneic HSCT were included. Patients received oral venetoclax with a 3-day ramp-up: 100 mg on day 1, 200 mg on day 2, and 400 mg once per day from day 3 of cycle one, and then every 28 days of each cycle (two to four in total). Decitabine was administered intravenously at a dose of 20 mg/m 2 from days 1 to 5 every 28 days. At cycle one, patients were admitted to hospital for a minimum of 24 h, whereas subsequent cycles could be administered on an outpatient basis. Two additional cycles were allowed while waiting for allogeneic HSCT or for those with no response or partial response after cycle two. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who had allogeneic HSCT performed during first complete remission, assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the study medication. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04476199, ongoing) and EudraCT (2020-002297-26)., Findings: Between June 1, 2021, and Dec 30, 2022, 93 patients were enrolled and started venetoclax plus decitabine induction (44 [47%] at intermediate risk and 49 [53%] at high risk). The median age was 68·5 (IQR 60·3-74·7). All 93 participants were White, of whom 43 (46%) were female and 50 (54%) were male. The median follow-up was 236 days (IQR 121-506). 64 (69%) of 93 patients reached complete remission and 53 (57%) underwent allogeneic HSCT in complete remission. 53 (83%) of 64 with a complete remission underwent allogeneic HSCT. Five (8%) of 64 patients in complete remission relapsed before transplantation and four died as a consequence. Adverse events (grade ≥3) occurred in 49 (53%) of 93 patients. The most common adverse events were infections (including pneumonia, bacterial sepsis, and SARS-CoV-2 causing seven deaths among 28 [57%] of 49 patients), neutropenia (17 [35%]), thrombocytopenia (two [4%], including one fatal CNS bleeding), and cardiac events (four [8%], including one fatal heart failure). No treatment-related deaths were observed., Interpretation: Venetoclax plus decitabine induction can significantly enhance the feasibility of allogeneic HSCT in older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia who are deemed fit for transplantation., Funding: AbbVie and Johnson & Johnson., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests DR received consulting fees from Medac; honoraria and travel grants from Jazz Pharma, Novartis, MSD, Kite Gilead, and Medac; and has participated in data safety monitoring and advisory board meetings for Novartis, MSD, Kite Gilead, Medac, AbbVie, and Janssen. EB received consulting fees from AbbVie; travel grants from Amgen, Novartis, and AbbVie; and has participated in data safety monitoring and advisory board meetings for Otsuka and Amgen. FO received honoraria from Takeda, Medac, and Kyowa; and travel grants from Roche, Janssen, Kyowa, Takeda, Jazz Pharma, and Medac. RS received a travel grant from Takeda. MaM received honoraria from Novartis, MSD, Astellas Pharma, AbbVie, Takeda, Pfizer, Sanofi, Jazz Pharma, Janssen Cilag, Kite Gilead, Medac, and Bristol Myers Squibb; travel grants from Kite Gilead, Roche, and Janssen Cilag; has participated in data safety monitoring and advisory board meetings for Novartis, Takeda, Kite Gilead, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Janssen Cilag; and served as president of GITMO. CA received honoraria from AbbVie and Jazz Pharma; and has participated in data safety monitoring and advisory board meetings for AbbVie, Jazz Pharma, and Amgen. GB received travel grants from Janssen Cilag and Amgen. AC received honoraria from AbbVie, Menarini (Stemline), Pfizer, Jazz Pharma, and Servier; a travel grant from Jazz Pharma; and has participated in data safety monitoring and advisory board meetings for AbbVie and Menarini (Stemline). CG received consulting fees from AbbVie, Jazz Pharma, Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Astellas; and a travel grant from Jazz Pharma. PM received honoraria and travel grants from AbbVie and Johnson & Johnson. LG received honoraria from Novartis, MSD, Gilead, AbbVie, Sanofi, and Bristol Myers Squibb; and travel grants from Janssen and AbbVie. CS received honoraria from Jazz Pharma and Kite Pharma; and a travel grant from Jazz Pharma. VR received travel grants from Neovii, Medac, and Jazz Pharma. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: Advanced phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive myeloid disease-consisting of chronic myeloid leukaemia in the myeloid blast phase and in the accelerated phase, and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukaemia-is associated with poor outcomes. Although previous studies have suggested the benefit of chemotherapy and BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations, the optimal regimen is uncertain and prospective studies for this rare group of diseases are scant. Preclinical and retrospective clinical data suggest possible synergy between the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax and BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We therefore aimed to design a study to evaluate the safety and activity of a novel combination of decitabine, venetoclax, and the third-generation BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor ponatinib in advanced phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive myeloid diseases., Methods: For this phase 2 study, patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated or relapsed or refractory myeloid chronic myeloid leukaemia-blast phase, chronic myeloid leukaemia-accelerated phase, or advanced phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukaemia, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-3 were eligible. Patients were eligible regardless of the number of previous lines of therapy received or previous receipt of ponatinib. Cycle 1 (induction) consisted of a 7-day lead-in of ponatinib 45 mg orally daily (days 1-7), followed by combination therapy with decitabine 20 mg/m 2 intravenously on days 8-12, venetoclax orally daily with ramp-up to a maximum dose of 400 mg on days 8-28, and ponatinib 45 mg orally daily on days 8-28. Cycles 2-24 consisted of decitabine 20 mg/m 2 intravenously on days 1-5, venetoclax orally 400 mg on days 1-21, and ponatinib orally daily on days 1-28. Response-based dosing of ponatinib was implemented in consolidation cycles, with reduction to 30 mg daily in patients who reached complete remission or complete remission with an incomplete haematological recovery and a reduction to 15 mg daily in patients with undetectable BCR::ABL1 transcripts. The primary endpoint was the composite rate of complete remission or complete remission with incomplete haematological recovery in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04188405) and is still ongoing., Results: Between July 12, 2020, and July 8, 2023, 20 patients were treated (14 with chronic myeloid leukaemia-blast phase, four with chronic myeloid leukaemia-accelerated phase, and two with advanced phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukaemia). The median age was 43 years (IQR 32-58); 13 (65%) patients were male and seven (35%) were female; and 12 (60%) were White, three (15%) were Hispanic, four (20%) were Black, and one (5%) was Asian. 12 (60%) patients had received 2 or more previous BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and 14 (70%) patients had at least one high-risk additional chromosomal abnormality or complex karyotype. The median duration of follow-up was 21·2 months (IQR 14·1-24·2). The complete remission or complete remission with an incomplete haematological recovery rate was 50% (10 of 20 patients); complete remission in one [5%] patient and complete remission with incomplete haematological recovery in nine [45%]). An additional six (30%) patients had a morphologic leukaemia-free state. The most common grade 3-4 non-haematological adverse events were febrile neutropenia in eight (40%) patients, infection in six (30%), and alanine or aspartate transaminase elevation in five (25%). Eight (40%) patients had at least one cardiovascular event of any grade. There were three on-study deaths, none of which was considered related to the study treatment and all from infections in the setting of refractory leukaemia., Interpretation: The combination of decitabine, venetoclax, and ponatinib is safe and shows promising activity in patients with advanced phase chronic myeloid leukaemia, including those with multiple previous therapies or high-risk disease features. Further studies evaluating chemotherapy and venetoclax-based combination strategies using newer-generation BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors are warranted., Funding: Takeda Oncology, the National Institutes of Health, and the National Cancer Institute Cancer Center., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests NJS has received consulting fees from Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, NKARTA, Autolus, and Sanofi; research funding from Takeda Oncology, Astellas Pharma, Xencor, Stemline Therapeutics, and NextCure; and honoraria from Adaptive Biotechnologies, Novartis, Amgen, Takeda Oncology, Pfizer, Astellas Pharma, Sanofi, and BeiGene. EJ has received consulting fees and research funding from AbbVie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, Ascentage, ASTX Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Autolus, BMS, Genenenctech, Hikma, Kite, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda Oncology, and Jazz. HA has received consulting fees from Molecular Partners; research funding from Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, and EBD-300; and honoraria from Illumina. MK has received consulting fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Auxenion, Bakx, Boehringer, Dark Blue Therapeutics, F Hoffman-La Roche, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Legend, MEI Pharma, Redona, Sanofi, Sellas, Stemline, and Vincerx; research funding from AbbVie, Allogene, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Gilead, ImmunoGen, MEI Pharma, Precision, Rafael, Sanofi, and Stemline; honoraria from AbbVie, Baxk Therapeutics, Genentech, and Stemline Therapeutics; stock options in Reata Pharamceuticals; and holds patents with Novartis, Eli Lilly, and Reata Pharmaceutical. HK has received research funding from AbbVie, Amgen, Ascentage, BMS, Daiichi-Sankyo, Immunogen, and Novartis and honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Ascentage, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, KAHR Medical, Novartis, Pfizer, Shenzhen Target Rx, Stemline, and Takeda Oncology. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Purpose of Review: Multiple myeloma is currently treated with a one-size-fits-all approach despite significant heterogeneity in patient outcomes and disease molecular constitution. A personalised approach would tailor therapy to unique patient or disease characteristics., Recent Findings: Well established prognostic biomarkers such as cytogenetic risk and patient frailty status are being evaluated as potential predictive biomarkers. Specifically, treatment intensity can be augmented in high-risk patients or conversely attenuated in those at lower risk or lower ability to withstand treatment toxicities. Alternatively, targeted therapy can be rationally designed to exploit vulnerable pathways in myeloma cells as identified using predictive biomarkers. The t(11;14) translocation, found in approximately 15-20% of myeloma cases, is a leading biomarker for response to BCL-2 inhibitors such as venetoclax., Summary: Active research efforts exploring venetoclax combination therapies, as well as new generation BCL-2 inhibitors are underway. Following the development of venetoclax, numerous other cellular pathways are under investigation as candidate predictive biomarkers to rationally inform newer targeted therapies in myeloma., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To conduct post hoc analyses of the VERTIS CV (NCT01986881) trial to explore the effects of ertugliflozin on serum uric acid (UA) and gout-related outcomes., Materials and Methods: Participants with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease were randomised (1:1:1) to placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg or ertugliflozin 15 mg. Mean UA over time (260 weeks) was evaluated for pooled ertugliflozin versus placebo overall, and by baseline quintile of UA (≤4.3 mg/dL [≤255.8 µmol/L], >4.3-5.1 mg/dL [>255.8-303.4 µmol/L], >5.1-5.8 mg/dL [>303.4-345.0 µmol/L], >5.8-6.9 mg/dL [>345.0-410.4 µmol/L] and >6.9 mg/dL [>410.4 µmol/L]), glycated haemoglobin level, albuminuria status, estimated glomerular filtration rate and KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease) risk category. The effect of ertugliflozin on a composite of gout onset or initiation of anti-gout medication was assessed., Results: The mean UA levels at baseline were 5.67 and 5.62 mg/dL in the placebo and ertugliflozin groups, respectively. Ertugliflozin reduced UA over Weeks 6-260 compared with placebo, with least squares mean (LSM) changes (95% confidence interval [CI]) from baseline at Week 260 of 0.07 mg/dL (-0.02, 0.15) and -0.19 mg/dL (-0.25, -0.13) in the placebo and pooled ertugliflozin groups, respectively. At Week 260, placebo-adjusted LSM change (95% CI) from baseline in UA was -0.26 mg/dL (-0.36, -0.16) with ertugliflozin. Ertugliflozin was associated with reductions in UA across baseline UA quintiles compared with placebo. The incidence of the composite of gout-related outcomes was 84/2539 (3.3%) for placebo and 133/5091 (2.6%) for ertugliflozin (hazard ratio for the composite 0.76 [95% CI 0.580, 1.002])., Conclusions: Ertugliflozin was generally associated with lowering UA overall and across subgroups compared with placebo, and numerically reduced rates of gout-related outcome events., (© 2024 Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. Pfizer Inc and The Author(s). Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Venetoclax synergizes with low-intensity regimens such as hypomethylating agents (HMAs) and low-dose cytarabine (LDAC). However, less is known about the clinical activity of venetoclax combined with HMAs or LDAC. Therefore, the current study focused on assessing the clinical efficacy, safety, and predictive factors for response to these venetoclax-based regimens in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A comprehensive search for literature related to our study objective was performed on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. The statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager or the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. In addition, methodological quality evaluation of nonrandomized studies was conducted using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale, while bias assessment of randomized studies was performed with Cochrane's risk of bias tool. Twelve studies, including 1432 elderly AML patients treated with venetoclax-based regimens, were identified for review and analysis. The pooled analysis showed that the rate of complete response with or without incomplete blood count recovery (CR/CRi) and overall response rate (ORR) among patients treated with venetoclax and HMAs was 59% and 64%, respectively. On the other hand, an CR/CRi of 50% was observed in patients treated with venetoclax and LDAC. Furthermore, venetoclax combined with HMAs demonstrated a significant survival benefit over HMAs alone and intensive chemotherapy (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.47-0.68; P < .00001). The most common grade ≥ 3 hematologic disorder, nonhematological event, and infection in AML patients treated with venetoclax and HMAs were febrile neutropenia (39%), hypokalemia (12%), and pneumonia (19%), respectively. Conversely, thrombocytopenia, hypokalemia, and pneumonia were more common in patients treated with venetoclax and LDAC (41%, 15%, and 12%, respectively). Venetoclax combined with HMAs or LDAC has good clinical activity and a manageable safety profile in elderly patients with AML., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have stated that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This retrospective study at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center evaluated frontline venetoclax combination therapy in 11 pediatric/adolescent patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Despite the small sample size and retrospective nature, the treatment demonstrated safety and potential efficacy, with most patients achieving early complete remission. Adverse events were consistent with other AML therapies, and no discontinuations due to toxicity occurred. While acknowledging study limitations, including selection bias and diverse concurrent therapies, this research underscores the promising role of venetoclax in pediatric AML. Further investigation is crucial to validate its long-term efficacy in this population., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: First-line treatment in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) unfit for intensive therapy is the combination of a hypomethylating agent (HMA) with venetoclax (VEN). However, retrospective data confirming the benefits of this regimen outside of clinical trials have shown conflicting results., Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of outcomes with first-line HMA-VEN versus HMA in AML patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy., Results: A total of 213 patients were included from three German hospitals (125 HMA-VEN, 88 HMA). Median overall survival in the HMA-VEN cohort was 7.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.1-14.7) versus 4.9 months (3.1-7.1) with HMA. After 1 year, 42% (95% CI, 33-54) and 19% (12-30) of patients were alive, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] for death, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46-0.88). After adjusting for clinical and molecular baseline characteristics, treatment with HMA-VEN remained significantly associated with both prolonged survival (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29-0.77) and time to next treatment (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47-0.85). Patients who achieved recovery of peripheral blood counts had a favorable prognosis (HR for death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.84)., Discussion: These data align with findings from the pivotal VIALE-A trial and support the use of HMA-VEN in patients unfit for intensive therapy., (© 2024 The Author(s). European Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: AZD5991, a human MCL-1 inhibitor, was assessed for safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity as monotherapy and in combination with venetoclax in patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies., Patients and Methods: In the monotherapy cohort (n = 61), patients with hematologic malignancies received AZD5991 intravenously in escalating doses either once or twice weekly, following intrapatient dose escalation, during a 3-week cycle. In the combination cohort (n = 17), patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome received escalating doses of AZD5991 and venetoclax during either a 3- or 4-week cycle. Primary objectives were safety and maximum tolerated dose; secondary objectives included plasma pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity., Results: The most common (≥30%) adverse events were diarrhea (59.0%), nausea (55.1%), and vomiting (47.4%). Four deaths occurred because of adverse events: cardiac arrest, sepsis, tumor lysis syndrome, and acute respiratory failure; only tumor lysis syndrome was related to AZD5991. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in five patients. Three patients with myelodysplastic syndrome achieved an objective response: one marrow complete remission without hematologic improvement, one partial remission with AZD5991 monotherapy, and one marrow complete remission with AZD5991 + venetoclax. Asymptomatic elevations of troponin I or T were observed in eight (10.3%) patients. Post hoc retrospective analysis revealed elevated troponin T in 14/31 patients before any AZD5991 dose and in 54/65 patients after any AZD5991 dose at or after Cycle 1. No associations were found between elevated troponin and cardiovascular risk factors., Conclusions: Treatment with AZD5991 was associated with high incidence of laboratory troponin elevation and a low overall response rate., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Venetoclax was approved for relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (R/R CLL) and small lymphocytic leukemia (SLL) in Japan in September 2019; however, clinical data in Japanese patients are limited. This all-case post-marketing surveillance assessed efficacy and safety in Japanese patients with R/R CLL/SLL who started venetoclax treatment between November 2019 and August 2020. Overall, the safety and efficacy analysis sets included 129 and 114 patients, respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) was 57.0%; ORRs were higher in patients with versus without concomitant rituximab (65.4% vs. 54.7%), and in patients with 1 versus ≥ 2 prior lines of therapies (72.5% vs. 44.4%). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 66.7% of patients (86/129); the most common AEs were neutrophil count decreased (22.5%), white blood cell count decreased (7.8%), and tumor lysis syndrome (TLS; 6.2%). AEs of special interest (TLS, myelosuppression, and infection) were manageable in clinical practice in Japan. Venetoclax is efficacious and safe for R/R CLL/SLL patients in the real-world setting in Japan. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04198415., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Abstract: In the CLL14 study, patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and coexisting conditions were randomized to 12 cycles of venetoclax-obinutuzumab (Ven-Obi, n = 216) or chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (Clb-Obi, n = 216). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point. Key secondary end points included time-to-next-treatment (TTNT), rates of undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD), overall survival (OS), and rates of adverse events. Patient reported outcomes of time until definitive deterioration (TUDD) in quality of life (QoL) were analyzed. At a median observation time of 76.4 months, PFS remained superior for Ven-Obi compared with Clb-Obi (median, 76.2 vs 36.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.52; P < .0001). Likewise, TTNT was longer after Ven-Obi (6-year TTNT, 65.2% vs 37.1%; HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.33-0.58; P < .0001). In the Ven-Obi arm, presence of del(17p), unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region, and lymph node size of ≥5 cm were independent prognostic factors for shorter PFS. The 6-year OS rate was 78.7% in the Ven-Obi and 69.2% in the Clb-Obi arm (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.48-1.01; P = .052). A significantly longer TUDD in global health status/QoL was observed in the Ven-Obi than in the Clb-Obi arm (median, 82.1 vs 65.1 months; HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51-0.97). Follow-up-adjusted second primary malignancies incidence rates were 2.3 and 1.4 per 1000 patient-months in the Ven-Obi and Clb-Obi arm, respectively. The sustained long-term survival and QoL benefits support the use of 1-year fixed-duration Ven-Obi in CLL. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02242942., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Deep single-cell multi-omic profiling offers a promising approach to understand and overcome drug resistance in relapsed or refractory (rr) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here, we combine single-cell ex vivo drug profiling (pharmacoscopy) with single-cell and bulk DNA, RNA, and protein analyses, alongside clinical data from 21 rrAML patients. Unsupervised data integration reveals reduced ex vivo response to the Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) in patients treated with both a hypomethylating agent (HMA) and VEN, compared to those pre-exposed to chemotherapy or HMA alone. Integrative analysis identifies both known and unreported mechanisms of innate and treatment-related VEN resistance and suggests alternative treatments, like targeting increased proliferation with the PLK inhibitor volasertib. Additionally, high CD36 expression in VEN-resistant blasts associates with sensitivity to CD36-targeted antibody treatment ex vivo. This study demonstrates how single-cell multi-omic profiling can uncover drug resistance mechanisms and treatment vulnerabilities, providing a valuable resource for future AML research., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The therapeutic effects of ertugliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, on cardiovascular outcome are not fully understood. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin on cardiac function in people with type 2 diabetes and pre-heart failure., Methods: We conducted a 24-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving individuals with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with antidiabetic medications. Participants with left ventricular hypertrophy, E/e' >15, or impaired left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) were randomized 1:1 to receive either ertugliflozin (5 mg once daily) or a placebo. The primary outcome was the change in LVGLS. Secondary outcomes included changes in left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Prespecified exploratory outcomes, including angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and angiotensin (1-7) levels, were also assessed., Results: A total of 102 individuals (mean age, 63.9 ± 9.2 years; 38% women) were included. The ertugliflozin group showed a significant improvement in LVGLS (- 15.5 ± 3.1% to - 16.6 ± 2.8%, P = 0.004) compared to the placebo group (- 16.7 ± 2.7% to - 16.4 ± 2.6%, P = 0.509), with a significant between-group difference (P = 0.013). Improvements in LVMI and LVEF were also observed. Additionally, significant reductions in HbA 1c , systolic blood pressure, whole-body and visceral fat, uric acid, proteinuria, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and lipoprotein(a) were noted. ACE2 and angiotensin (1-7) levels significantly increased in the ertugliflozin group compared to the placebo group and correlated with changes in LVGLS [r = 0.456, P < 0.001 for ACE2; r = 0.541, P < 0.001 for angiotensin (1-7)]. Adverse events were similar between the two groups., Conclusions: This study demonstrated that ertugliflozin has beneficial effects on left ventricular function in individuals with type 2 diabetes and pre-heart failure, and it provided insights into potential underlying mechanisms., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03717194., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Venetoclax plus azacitidine treatment is clinically beneficial for elderly and unfit acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. However, the treatment is rarely curative, and relapse due to resistant disease eventually emerges. Since no current clinically feasible treatments are known to be effective at the state of acquired venetoclax resistance, this is becoming a major challenge in AML treatment. Studying venetoclax-resistant AML cell lines, we observed that venetoclax induced sublethal apoptotic signaling and DNA damage even though cell survival and growth were unaffected. This effect could be due to venetoclax inducing a sublethal degree of mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization. Based on these results, we hypothesized that the sublethal apoptotic signaling induced by venetoclax could constitute a vulnerability in venetoclax-resistant AML cells. This was supported by screens with a broad collection of drugs, where we observed a synergistic effect between venetoclax and PARP inhibition in venetoclax-resistant cells. Additionally, the venetoclax-PARP inhibitor combination prevented the acquisition of venetoclax resistance in treatment naïve AML cell lines. Furthermore, the addition of azacitidine to the venetoclax-PARP inhibitor combination enhanced venetoclax induced DNA damage and exhibited exceptional sensitivity and long-term responses in the venetoclax-resistant AML cell lines and samples from AML patients that had clinically relapsed under venetoclax-azacitidine therapy. In conclusion, we mechanistically identify a new vulnerability in acquired venetoclax-resistant AML cells and identify PARP inhibition as a potential therapeutic approach to overcome acquired venetoclax resistance in AML., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: As we delve into the intricate world of venetoclax combination therapy in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), our exploration not only aims to contribute to the current body of knowledge but also strives to inform future research directions, clinical decision-making, and the ongoing evolution of therapeutic strategies in the relentless pursuit of improved outcomes for patients facing this formidable hematologic malignancy., Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to November 2023 for English-language studies on venetoclax combination therapy in relapsed/refractory AML. We excluded duplicate published studies, incomplete studies, those with incomplete data, animal experiments, literature reviews, and systematic studies. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 15.1., Results: Out of 58 identified articles, seven were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled complete remission (CR) rate was 15.4%, and the composite complete remission (CRc) rate was 35.7%. The partial remission (PR) rate was 2.6%, while the non-remission (NR) rate was 24.4%. The minimal residual disease status in CRc patients (MRD-CRc) rate was 39.4%, and the morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) rate was 10.3%. Incidence of adverse events included diarrhea (10.0%), nausea (4.3%), vomiting (2.6%), hypokalemia (16.4%), hypomagnesemia (0.8%), decreased appetite (4.2%), fatigue (9.1%), febrile neutropenia (39.6%), and thrombocytopenia (28.4%). Subgroup analysis based on combined drugs revealed varying CR and CRc rates. the combination of venetoclax and azacitidine + demonstrates superior outcomes, displaying the highest rates of CR at 31.3% and CRc at 62.7%. In contrast, venetoclax and idasanutlin exhibits a moderate CR rate of 6.1% and a CRc rate of 26.5%, while venetoclax and mivebresib shows the lowest CR rate at 3.3% and a moderate CRc rate of 8.0%., Conclusion: In conclusion, while venetoclax combination therapies, particularly with azacitidine + , show promise in achieving favorable treatment responses in relapsed/refractory AML patients, a comprehensive evaluation of safety profiles is essential. Nevertheless, it is essential to underscore the markedly increased incidence rates of febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopenia observed among adverse events., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Abstract: T-prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL) is a mature T-cell neoplasm associated with marked chemotherapy resistance and continued poor clinical outcomes. Current treatments, that is, the CD52-antibody alemtuzumab, offer transient responses, with relapses being almost inevitable without consolidating allogeneic transplantation. Recent more detailed concepts of T-PLL's pathobiology fostered the identification of actionable vulnerabilities: (1) altered epigenetics, (2) defective DNA damage responses, (3) aberrant cell-cycle regulation, and (4) deregulated prosurvival pathways, including T-cell receptor and JAK/STAT signaling. To further develop related preclinical therapeutic concepts, we studied inhibitors of histone deacetylases ([H]DACs), B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2), cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK), mouse double minute 2 (MDM2), and classical cytostatics, using (1) single-agent and combinatorial compound testing in 20 well-characterized and molecularly profiled primary T-PLL (validated by additional 42 cases) and (2) 2 independent murine models (syngeneic transplants and patient-derived xenografts). Overall, the most efficient/selective single agents and combinations (in vitro and in mice) included cladribine, romidepsin ([H]DAC), venetoclax (BCL2), and/or idasanutlin (MDM2). Cladribine sensitivity correlated with expression of its target RRM2. T-PLL cells revealed low overall apoptotic priming with heterogeneous dependencies on BCL2 proteins. In additional 38 T-cell leukemia/lymphoma lines, TP53 mutations were associated with resistance toward MDM2 inhibitors. P53 of T-PLL cells, predominantly in wild-type configuration, was amenable to MDM2 inhibition, which increased its MDM2-unbound fraction. This facilitated P53 activation and downstream signals (including enhanced accessibility of target-gene chromatin regions), in particular synergy with insults by cladribine. Our data emphasize the therapeutic potential of pharmacologic strategies to reinstate P53-mediated apoptotic responses. The identified efficacies and their synergies provide an informative background on compound and patient selection for trial designs in T-PLL., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Despite the widespread use of R-CHOP therapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the therapeutic efficacy for this disease remains suboptimal, primarily due to the heterogeneity of refractory and/or relapsed diseases. To address this challenge, optimization of DLBCL treatment regimens has focused on the strategy of combining an additional drug "X" with R-CHOP to enhance efficacy. However, the failure of R-CHOP combined with the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib in treating ABC-type DLBCL patients has raised significant concerns regarding ibrutinib resistance. While some studies suggest that venetoclax may synergize with ibrutinib to kill ibrutinib-resistant cells, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Our study aimed to validate the enhanced tumor-suppressive effect of combining ibrutinib with venetoclax against ibrutinib-resistant cells and elucidate its potential mechanisms. Our experimental results demonstrated that ibrutinib-resistant cells exhibited significant cytotoxicity to the combination therapy of ibrutinib and venetoclax, inducing cell apoptosis through activation of the mitochondrial pathway and inhibition of aerobic respiration. Furthermore, we validated the inhibitory effect of this combination therapy on tumor growth in in vivo models. Therefore, our study proposes that the combination therapy of ibrutinib and venetoclax is a promising treatment strategy that can be applied in clinical practice for ABC-type DLBCL, offering a new solution to overcome the urgent challenge of ibrutinib resistance.

Background and Objectives: Acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome are both clonal hematologic malignancies that primarily affect older adults. Current treatments for AML/MDS are both limited in number and efficacy. This study aims to evaluate venetoclax-based therapies in AML/MDS, focusing on overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates, and to expand real-world data on its use. Materials and Methods: Clinical and laboratory data on patients with AML/MDS aged 18≥ treated with venetoclax between January 2019 and July 2022 were included. Survival analysis was calculated based on the period from 2019 to December 2023. Results: A total of 161 AML and 40 patients with MDS were included. The median age was 63.53 ± 15.30 years for AML and 70.12 ± 10.21 years for MDS. In both groups, over 55% are male. A total of 77.6% of patients with AML and 75% of patients with MDS received treatment prior to venetoclax. Venetoclax was administered in combination with azacitidine to 84.5% of AML and 67.5% of MDS. The relapse rate in AML is approximately 15%. Overall, the 2-year survival rate is 46% and 18.73 months. The overall CR/CRi rate for patients with AML is 49.1%, while for patients with MDS, it is 50%. The 2-year survival rate for patients with MDS is 52.7%. The 2-year RFS rate was 75.5% for AML and 90.9% for MDS. The relapse rate in AML is approximately 15%. The percentage of adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation among those with grade 3-4 toxicity is low; 26.7% for AML ( n = 43) and 15% for MDS ( n = 6). Conclusions: Our real-world data demonstrate that venetoclax has the potential to improve overall survival rates when used in combination with HMAs and supports its use in patients with AML/MDS.

Background: The diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) variant of Richter transformation (DLBCL-RT) is typically chemoresistant with poor prognosis. Aiming to explore a chemotherapy-free treatment combination that triggers anti-tumour immune responses, we conducted a phase 2 study of atezolizumab (a PD-L1 inhibitor) in combination with venetoclax and obinutuzumab in patients with DLBCL-RT., Methods: This was a prospective, open-label, multicentre, single-arm, investigator-initiated, phase 2 study in 15 hospitals in Italy and Switzerland. Eligible patients had a confirmed diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma as per the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) 2008 criteria with biopsy-proven transformation to DLBCL; had not previously received treatment for DLBCL-RT, although they could have received chronic lymphocytic leukaemia therapies; were aged 18 years or older; and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2. No previous treatment with any of the drugs in the triplet combination was allowed. Patients received 35 cycles of 21 days of intravenous obinutuzumab (100 mg on day 1, 900 mg on day 2, 1000 mg on day 8 and day 15 of cycle 1; 1000 mg on day 1 of cycles 2-8) and intravenous atezolizumab (1200 mg on day 2 of cycle 1 and 1200 mg on day 1 of cycles 2-18), and continuous oral venetoclax (ramp-up from 20 mg/day on day 15 of cycle 1 according to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia schedule, then 400 mg/day from day 1 of cycle 3 to day 21 of cycle 35). The primary endpoint was overall response rate at day 21 of cycle 6 in the intention-to-treat population. We considered an overall response rate of 67% or more to be clinically active, rejecting the null hypothesis of a response of 40% or less. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04082897, and has been completed., Findings: Between Oct 9, 2019, and Oct 19, 2022, 28 patients were enrolled (12 [43%] male patients and 16 [57%] female patients). Median follow-up was 16·8 months (IQR 7·8-32·0). At cycle 6, 19 of 28 patients showed a response, yielding an overall response rate of 67·9% (95% CI 47·6-84·1). Treatment-emergent adverse events that were grade 3 or worse were reported in 17 (61%; 95% CI 40·6-78·5) of 28 patients, with neutropenia being the most frequent (11 [39%; 21·5-59·4] of 28 patients). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in eight (29%; 14·2-48·7) patients, which were most commonly infections (five [18%; 6·1-36·9] of 28 patients). There were two (7%) deaths attributable to adverse events during the study: one from sepsis and one from fungal pneumonia, which were not considered as directly treatment-related by the investigators. Six (21·4%) patients had immune-related adverse events, none of which led to discontinuation. No tumour lysis syndrome was observed., Interpretation: The atezolizumab, venetoclax, and obinutuzumab triplet combination was shown to be active and safe, suggesting that this chemotherapy-free regimen could become a new first-line treatment approach in patients with DLBCL-RT., Funding: Roche., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests AT reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Janssen, Beigene, and Abbvie; support for attending meetings or travel from Abbvie, Janssen, and Beigene; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Janssen, Abbvie, Beigene, Lilly, and AstraZeneca. AMF reports consulting fees from Janssen; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Janssen, Beigene, and AstraZeneca; support for attending meetings or travel from Abbvie, Janssen, Beigene, and AstraZeneca; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Janssen, Beigene, and AstraZeneca. ACo reports grants or contracts from Gilead, BMS, Beigene, Abbvie, Janssen-Cilag, and AstraZeneca; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, Abbvie, and Janssen-Cilag; support for attending meetings or travel from Janssen; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from BMS. MC reports grants or contracts from Johnson & Johnson and Abbvie; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Abbvie and AstraZeneca; support for attending meetings or travel from Johnson & Johnson, Abbvie, and AstraZeneca; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Johnson & Johnson, Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, and GSK. RC reports support for the present manuscript from the US National Institutes of Health and National Cancer Institute (R01CA196703–01). PLZ reports consulting fees and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Takeda, BMS, MSD, Roche, Gilead, Novartis, Abbvie, Beigene, Kyowa Kirin, and Janssen. MMot reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events; support for attending meetings or travel; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Abbvie, Janssen, and AstraZeneca. GG reports grants from Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro and Piano Nazionale di Ripresa e Resilienza; consulting fees from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beiene, Hikma, and Johnson & Johnson; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Hikma, Johnson & Johnson, and Lilly. LS reports consulting from Abbvie, Beigene, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Merck; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Abbvie, Beigene, Lilly, Octapharma, AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Merck; support for attending meetings or travel from AstraZeneca, Janssen, and Beigene; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Merck. RCa reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Abbvie, Gilead, Gentilipharma, Pierre Fabre, Celgene, and Menarini stemline; support for attending meetings or travel from Pierre Fabre, Beigene, and Servier; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Celgene, Abbvie, Gentilipharma, and Daichi Samkio. TZ report consulting fees and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Roche, Novartis, Gilead, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Lilly, and Abbvie. EZ reports consulting fees from Abbvie, Beigene, BMS, Cures, Elly and Lilly, Incyte, Ipsen, Merck, Miltenyibiomedicine, and Roche; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, and Gilead; support for attending meetings or travel from Abbvie; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Merck. DR reports support for the present manuscript from Adaptive; grants or contracts, consulting fees, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, BMS, Janssen, and Lilly. All other authors declare no competing interests. No honoraria or payments were made for authorship., (Copyright © Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Introduction: The combined use of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax with azacitidine now is the standard of care for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) unfit for intensive chemotherapy with outcomes exceeding those achieved with hypomethylating agents alone. Venetoclax in combination with intensive chemotherapy is also increasingly used both as frontline as well as salvage therapy. However, resistance to and relapse after venetoclax-based therapies are of major concern and outcomes after treatment failure remain poor., Areas Covered: A comprehensive search was performed using PubMed database (up to April 2024). Studies evaluating venetoclax-based combination treatments in AML and studies assessing markers of response and resistance to venetoclax were investigated. We summarize the status of venetoclax-based therapies in the frontline and relapsed/refractory setting with focus on the main mechanisms of resistance to BCL-2 inhibition. Further, strategies to overcome resistance including combinatorial regimens of hypomethylating agent (HMA) + venetoclax + inhibitors targeting actionable mutations like IDH1/2 or FLT3-ITD and the introduction of novel agents like menin-inhibitors are addressed., Expert Opinion: Although venetoclax is reshaping the treatment of unfit and fit AML patients, prognosis of patients after HMA/VEN failure remains dismal, and strategies to abrogate primary and secondary resistance are an unmet clinical need.

Although there is an approved indication for venetoclax and hypomethylating agents (VenHMA) and its use in different AML settings will be expanded in the following years, the management of the adverse events (AEs) lacks of harmonized algorithms during treatment of these patients. We have studied the incidence of relevant AEs of 43 patients who achieved a response to VenHMA and its management. Median overall survival of our cohort was 19 months. No patients discontinued treatment due to AEs after C3D1, Regarding severe AEs, high rates of grade 4 neutropenia (97.6%) and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (65.1%) were observed. Severe infectious AEs rate was 16%. Due to severe myelotoxicity, most patients required a progressive dose reduction of both venetoclax and hypomethylating agents during follow-up, being 87.8% at C6D1. Transfusional dependence rate was 91% and G-CSF was prescribed to 86% of the patients. Finally, there was not a significant difference in hemoglobin, platelets and absolute neutrophil count after achieving complete response comparing paired samples during follow-up, although cytopenia rate was high during initial follow-up. We conclude that dose reduction of VenHMA after achieving a response in patients diagnosed with AML is required in most patients and essential to avoid prolonged cytopenia-related adverse events and a rapid and standardized method on how to perform it might decrease the AEs rate., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) have poor prognosis and survival outcomes. Sacituzumab govitecan was newly approved into Chinese market for mTNBC. However, whether its price matches the survival benefit still needs exploring. Here, this study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan versus chemotherapy in patients with mTNBC from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system., Methods: A partitioned survival model consisting of three discrete health states was constructed to assess the cost-effectiveness of sacituzumab govitecan versus single-agent chemotherapy. The key clinical data in the model were from the ASCENT trial. Costs and utility inputs were collected from published literatures. Life-years gained, quality adjusted life-years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), incremental net health benefits, and incremental net monetary benefits were calculated between 2 treatment strategies. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to account for uncertainty and verify model robustness. Subgroup and cost-threshold analysis were also performed., Results: Sacituzumab govitecan provided an additional 0.25 QALYs and an incremental cost of $ 81,778.61 compared with chemotherapy, which was associated with an ICER of $ 323,603.84/QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that the model was most sensitive to the cost of sacituzumab govitecan, weight, and utility of progression-free survival. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that the probability of sacituzumab govitecan being cost-effective was 0%. Considering a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of 3 times GDP, the maximum cost of sacituzumab govitecan that would make it cost-effective was $155.65 per unit (180 mg)., Conclusions: Sacituzumab govitecan was not cost-effective for patients with mTNBC compared with chemotherapy at the commonly adopted WTP threshold of 3 times GDP per capita per QALY in China., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to establish a simple and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography method for therapeutic drug monitoring of venetoclax (VEN) and optimize regimens., Methods: The analysis required the extraction of a 50 μl plasma sample and the precipitation of proteins using acetonitrile extraction. The chromatographic method employed a mobile phase of acetonitrile: 0.5% KH 2 PO 4 (pH 3.5) (60/40, v/v) on a Diamond C 18 (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm) column at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. The quantitative method was validated based on standards described in 'Bioanalytical Method Validation: Guidance for Industry' published by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)., Results: The calibration curve was linear ( R2  = 0.9998) over the range of 75-4800 ng/ml, with limits of quantification of 25 ng/ml. The coefficients of intraday and interday validation, specificity, recovery, and stability all met the criteria of FDA guidance. The method was successfully applied to analyze VEN concentrations in 30 cases of acute myeloid leukemia patients. The peak concentration ( Cmax ) was 1881.19 ± 756.61 ng/ml, while the trough concentration ( Cmin ) was 1212.69 ± 767.92 ng/ml in acute myeloid leukemia patients., Conclusion: Our study establishes a simple, precise, and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography method for monitoring VEN and confirms its applicability for therapeutic drug monitoring of VEN in hematological cancers., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

The FMS-related tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor gilteritinib is standard therapy for relapsed/refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated (FLT3 mut ) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but the overall survival (OS) is only approximately 20 % and few patients achieve deep and/ or durable response. We retrospectively analyzed 29 R/R FLT3 mut AML patients treated on triplet regimens (gilteritinib+ venetoclax［VEN] +azacitidine［AZA]). Nineteen patients (65.5 %) had received prior FLT3 inhibitor therapy. The modified composite complete remission (mCRc) rate was 62.1 % (n = 18; CR, 4/29,13.8 %; CRi, 6/29, 20.7 %; MLFS, 8/29, 27.6 %). Among 18 patients achieved mCRc, FLT3-PCR negativity was 94.4 % (n=17), and flow-cytometry negativity was 77.7 % (n=14). The mCRc rate was 70 % (n=7) in 10 patients without prior FLT3 TKI exposure and 57.8 % (n=11) in 19 patients with prior FLT3 TKI exposure (P=0.52). At the end of the first cycle, the median time to ANC > 0.5× 10 9 /L was 38 days and platelet > 50× 10 9 /L was 31 days among responders, but 60-day mortality was 0 %. The estimated 2-year OS was 60.9 % for all R/R FLT3 mut patients. The 1-year OS was 80 % and 58.8 % in patients without and with prior FLT3 TKI exposure, respectively (P=0.79). The estimated 2-year OS was 62 % in 19 (65.5 %) patients who received allo-HSCT after triplet therapy and 37 % in 10 patients who did not receive allo-HSCT (P=0.03). In conclusion, triplet therapy with gilteritinib, VEN, and AZA is effective and safe and an excellent frontline option for R/R FLT3 mut AML., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Further line treatment of patients with advanced stage AL amyloidosis with cardiac involvement is challenging. Venetoclax is a promising option, especially in t(11;14) and BCL2 expression.In our multicentre observational study, we report the 3-year follow-up of Venetoclax treatment in 9 patients with advanced, relapsed or refractory AL amyloidosis with t(11;14) and BCL-2 expression in > 50% of plasma cells. At baseline, all patients had been previously treated with daratumumab, all had cardiac involvement with revised Mayo stage III or IV/ European modification of Mayo 2004 IIIA or IIIB (1/9 unclassified due to missing troponin T), 5/9 patients had renal involvement.After a median of 35 months (range 25-49) since the start of Venetoclax, 8/9 patients were still alive (OS 89%). First and best hematological responses were observed after a median of 26 days (11-125) and 106 days (35-659), overall response rate was 100% (7/9 CR, 2/9 VGPR). Where observed, organ response was documented within the first 6 months of therapy, including cardiac (6/9) and renal (3/5) improvements. Venetoclax was discontinued in 6/9 patients after a median of 15 months (11-48) due to toxicity (2/9), disease progression (2/9), fixed treatment duration (1/9), or safety concerns (1/9).In conclusion, Venetoclax induces a rapid and deep hematologic response with consistent improvement in organ function with an acceptable safety profile in patients with pretreated, advanced stage AL amyloidosis with cardiac involvement and BCL2 expression with and potentially without detected t(11:14), which warrants further investigation., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) and the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax in combination with obinutuzumab (VEN-O) are both recommended as frontline therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, VEN-O is a 12-month fixed-duration therapy generating durable remissions whereas BTKis are continuous treat-to-progression treatments., Objective: To examine costs before and after the fixed-duration treatment period for VEN-O relative to that observed for BTKis in a national sample of older US adults with CLL in the frontline setting., Methods: This retrospective analysis used Medicare Parts A, B, and D claims from 2016 to 2021. Fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 years or older initiating frontline CLL treatment with VEN-O or a BTKi treatment between June 1, 2019, and June 30, 2020 (index date = first prescription fill date), were included in the sample. Mean cost measures were captured for both groups over 2 fixed time periods calculated from the index date: Month 0 to 12 (proxy for VEN-O on-treatment period) and Month 13 to 18 (proxy for VEN-O off-treatment period). A difference-in-difference approach was used. Multivariate generalized linear models estimated changes in adjusted mean monthly costs during Month 0 to 12 vs Month 13 to 18, for the VEN-O group relative to the BTKi group., Results: The final sample contained 193 beneficiaries treated with VEN-O and 1,577 beneficiaries treated with BTKis. Risk-adjusted all-cause monthly total costs were similar for VEN-O patients ($13,887) and BTKi patients ($14,492) between Month 0 and 12. Moreover, during Month 13 to 18, the mean monthly all-cause total costs declined by 67% for VEN-O ($13,887 to $4,462) but only by 10% for BTKi ($14,492 to $13,051). Hence, the relative reduction in costs across the 2 periods was significantly larger for VEN-O (-$9,425) vs BTKi (-$1,441) patients (ie, difference in difference = -$7,984; P < 0.001). Similar patterns were observed for CLL-related costs, with the substantially larger reductions in CLL-related total monthly costs (-$9,880 VEN-O vs -$1,753 BTKi; P < 0.001) for the VEN-O group primarily driven by the larger reduction in CLL-related monthly prescription costs (-$9,437 VEN-O vs -$2,020 BTKi; P < 0.001)., Conclusions: This real-world study of older adults with CLL found a large reduction in monthly Medicare costs in the 6 months after completion of the fixed-duration treatment period of VEN-O, largely driven by the reduction in CLL-related prescription drug costs. A similar decline in costs was not observed among those treated with BTKis. Our study highlights the substantial economic benefits of fixed-duration VEN-O relative to treat-to-progression therapies like BTKis in the first-line CLL setting.

Despite significant progress in treating chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), resistance to therapy remains challenging. NOTCH1 activation, common in CLL, confers adverse prognosis. This study explores the impact of NOTCH1 signalling on venetoclax sensitivity in vitro. Although NOTCH1 activation minimally impaired the susceptibility of CLL cells to venetoclax, ex vivo cell competition studies reveal that cells with constitutive NOTCH1 activation outgrew their wild-type counterparts in the presence of ongoing venetoclax exposure. Our findings suggest that while NOTCH1 activation is insufficient to confer venetoclax refractoriness, there is enhanced potential for cells with NOTCH1 activation to escape and thus become fully resistant to venetoclax., (© 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) is considered high risk as it related to prior exposure to cytotoxic chemotherapy agents for solid tumors or hematologic malignancies. Compared with de novo AML, t-AML is associated with lower remission rates, inferior overall survival (OS) and higher relapse rates. Many efforts have been devoted to improving the overall but with limited success, and novel strategy is thus highly needed., Case Description: We reported one patient with refractory/relapsed t-AML was successfully treated with Palbociclib combined with Venetoclax and Azacytidine (AZA). In this case, a 47-year-old patient with t-AML recurred during Venetoclax in combination with AZA therapy. However, the patient achieved morphological, immunophenotypic and molecular complete remission again after Palbociclib combined with Venetoclax and AZA., Conclusions: Although only one successful case is presented here, three-drug combination regimens should be considered as another treatment option for t-AML in the future., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Real-world evidence comparing clinical outcomes between venetoclax and Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) in patients with frontline (1 L) chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is lacking. We compared treatment effectiveness of 1 L venetoclax plus obinutuzumab (VenO) versus BTKi-based regimens. This retrospective observational study using Optum Clinformatics Data Mart® included adult patients with CLL (≥2 outpatient or ≥1 inpatient claim) who received VenO or BTKi-based regimens in 1 L (1/2019-9/2022). Baseline characteristics were balanced using stabilised inverse probability weighting. Outcomes included duration of therapy (DoT), persistence, time to next treatment or death (TTNT-D), and time off-treatment. Among 1506 eligible patients (VenO: 203; BTKi: 1303), the median follow-up duration was 12.6 (VenO) and 16.2 months (BTKi). Median DoT for VenO was 12.3 months; persistence remained higher in VenO versus BTKi through expected 1 L fixed treatment duration. Median TTNT-D was not reached for VenO; however, more VenO- versus BTKi-treated patients had not switched therapies/experienced death through Month 12 (87.1% vs. 75.3%). Among patients that discontinued, median time to discontinuation was 11.7 vs. 5.9 months for VenO versus BTKi and median time off-treatment was 11.3 vs. 4.3 months. In this real-world study, VenO was associated with better effectiveness outcomes than BTKi-based regimens in 1 L CLL., (© 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Importance: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a clonal hematopoietic cancer that disrupts normal hematopoiesis, ultimately leading to bone marrow failure and death. The annual incidence rate of AML is 4.1 per 100 000 people in the US and is higher in patients older than 65 years. Acute myeloid leukemia includes numerous subgroups with heterogeneous molecular profiles, treatment response, and prognosis. This review discusses the evidence supporting frontline therapies in AML, the major principles that guide therapy, and progress with molecularly targeted therapy., Observations: Acute myeloid leukemia is a genetically complex, dynamic disease. The most commonly altered genes include FLT3, NPM1, DNMT3A, IDH1, IDH2, TET2, RUNX1, NRAS, and TP53. The incidence of these alterations varies by patient age, history of antecedent hematologic cancer, and previous exposure to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy for any cancer. Since 2010, molecular data have been incorporated into AML prognostication, gradually leading to incorporation of targeted therapies into the initial treatment approach of induction chemotherapy and subsequent management. The first molecularly targeted inhibitor, midostaurin, was approved to treat patients with AML with FLT3 variants in 2017. Since then, the understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of AML has expanded, allowing the identification of additional potential targets for drug therapy, treatment incorporation of molecularly targeted therapies (midostaurin, gilteritinib, and quizartinib targeting FLT3 variants; ivosidenib and olutasidenib targeting IDH1 variants, and enasidenib targeting IDH2), and identification of rational combination regimens. The approval of hypomethylating agents combined with venetoclax has revolutionized the therapy of AML in older adults, extending survival over monotherapy. Additionally, patients are now referred for hematopoietic cell transplant on a more rational basis., Conclusions and Relevance: In the era of genomic medicine, AML treatment is customized to the patient's comorbidities and AML genomic profile.

Background: Crisaborole, as a phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor (PDE4i), effectively inhibits inflammatory pathways, showing promising results in atopic dermatitis (AD), particularly in chronic hyperplasia lesions., Objectives: Based on real-world data from China, this study assesses the effectiveness and safety of 2% PDE4i ointment as monotherapy for chronic hyperplastic AD lesions., Materials and Methods: A total of 49 AD patients aged 12 and above with chronic hyperplastic lesions and Investigator's Static Global Assessment scores of mild or moderate were enrolled. They received 2% PDE4i ointment twice daily until the lesions completely cleared. The effectiveness endpoints comprised the onset time of pruritus and lesion remission and the time of complete lesion clearance., Results: PDE4i demonstrated high effectiveness with minimal irritation, notable improvement in hyperpigmentation, and early remission of pruritus and lesions. The response varied across age groups; elderly patients experienced quicker pruritus relief compared to adolescents and adults, while adolescents showed earlier lesion remission by about 3 days. No significant difference was observed across age groups in the time for complete lesion clearance. Additionally, AD duration (less or more than 3 years) did not significantly impact pruritus or lesion remission., Conclusions: PDE4i monotherapy is effective and safe for chronic hyperplasia lesions in AD across all age groups, and its effectiveness appears to be independent of AD duration., (© 2024 the International Society of Dermatology.)

Venetoclax-azacitidine is the standard of treatment for unfit acute myeloid leukemia patients. In the VIALE-A study, treatment was given until progression but there are no data on its optimal duration for responding patients who do not tolerate indefinite therapy. We retrospectively analyzed the outcome of patients who discontinued venetoclax or venetoclax-azacitidine due to poor tolerance. Sixty-two newly diagnosed (ND) AML patients and 22 patients with morphological relapse or refractory AML were included. In the ND cohort (n = 62), 28 patients stopped venetoclax and azacitidine and 34 patients continued azacitidine monotherapy. With a median follow-up of 23 months (IQR, 20-32), median overall survival and treatment-free survival were 44 (IQR, 16-NR) and 16 (IQR, 8-27) months, respectively. Patients who stopped both treatments and those who continued azacitidine monotherapy had the same outcomes. Negative minimal residual disease was associated with a 2-year treatment-free survival of 80%. In the RR cohort (n = 22), median overall survival and treatment-free survival were 19 (IQR, 17-31) and 10 (IQR, 5-NR) months, respectively. Prior number of venetoclax-azacitidine cycles and IDH mutations were associated with increased overall survival. The only factor significantly impacting treatment-free survival was the number of prior cycles. This study suggests that patients who discontinued treatment in remission have favorable outcomes supporting the rationale for prospective controlled trials., (© 2024 The Author(s). American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) remains the best consolidative modality in most patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Along with factors directly pertaining to SCT, pretransplantation disease control, performance status, and prior treatment-related complications are important factors that affect posttransplantation survival outcomes., Methods: The authors compared the survival outcomes of patients ≥60 years of age treated on the phase 2 clinical trial of venetoclax (Ven) added to cladribine (CLAD) and low dose cytarabine (LDAC) alternating with azacitidine (CLAD/LDAC/Ven arm) (NCT03586609) who underwent allogeneic SCT in first remission to a retrospective cohort of patients ≥60 years of age who underwent SCT after intensive chemotherapy. Intensive chemotherapy was defined as the use of cytarabine >1 g/m 2 and anthracyclines during induction/consolidation., Results: Thirty-five patients at median age of 68 years in the CLAD/LDAC/Ven arm were compared to 42 patients at a median age of 62 years in the intensive therapy arm. The 2-year relapse-free survival was superior with CLAD/LDAC/Ven versus intensive chemotherapy (88% vs. 65%; p = .03) whereas the 2-year overall survival (OS) was comparable (84% vs. 70%; p = .14). On a competing event analysis, the 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was significantly lower with CLAD/LDAC/Ven versus intensive chemotherapy (2.9% vs. 17.2%, Gray's p = .049) whereas nonrelapse mortality was comparable (16.2% vs. 17.1%; p = .486)., Conclusion: In conclusion, treatment with CLAD/LDAC/Ven was associated with favorable outcomes in older patients who underwent subsequent allogeneic SCT. The OS was comparable to that with intensive chemotherapy followed by allogeneic SCT, but the CIR rate was significantly lower., (© 2024 American Cancer Society.)

Combined therapy with venetoclax and hypomethylating agents has significantly improved the outcome of unfit patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. A recently published exploratory analysis of the VIALE-A trial reported that up to 51% of patients achieving remission survived more than 2 years. These data along with those from reallife settings, lead to questioning how long it is appropriate to continue treatment in long-term survivors. Accordingly, recent retrospective studies suggested the feasibility of suspending therapy in selected patients while maintaining prolonged responses. Also, these studies showed that retreatment may induce a second remission in almost a third of patients. We report the case of a patient who received salvage therapy with venetoclax and azacytidine, that was discontinued few cycles after blasts clearance because of severe hematological toxicity. Despite suspension, he maintained a sustained response lasting almost one year and was successfully retreated with the same combination when a second relapse occurred., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) comprises a group of heterogeneous and aggressive haematological malignancies with unsatisfactory prognoses and limited treatment options. Treatments targeting B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) with venetoclax have been approved for patients with AML, and venetoclax-based drug combinations are becoming the standard of care for older patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. However, the therapeutic duration of either single or combination strategies is limited, and the development of resistance seems inevitable. Therefore, more effective combination regimens are urgently needed., Methods: The efficacy of combination therapy with NL101, a SAHA-bendamustine hybrid, and venetoclax was evaluated in preclinical models of AML including established cell lines, primary blasts from patients, and animal models. RNA-sequencing and immunoblotting were used to explore the underlying mechanism., Results: NL101 significantly potentiated the activity of venetoclax in AML cell lines, as evidenced by the enhanced decrease in viability and induction of apoptosis. Mechanistically, the addition of NL101 to venetoclax decreased the stability of the antiapoptotic protein myeloid cell leukaemia-1 (MCL-1) by inhibiting ERK, thereby facilitating the release of BIM and triggering mitochondrial apoptosis. Moreover, the strong synergy between NL101 and venetoclax also relied on the downregulation of c-Myc via PI3K/Akt/GSK3β signalling. The combination of NL101 and venetoclax synergistically eliminated primary blasts from 10 AML patients and reduced the leukaemia burden in an MV4-11 cell-derived xenograft model., Conclusions: Our results encourage the pursuit of clinical trials of combined treatment with NL101 and venetoclax and provide a novel venetoclax-incorporating therapeutic strategy for AML., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Abstract: Pirtobrutinib is a highly selective, noncovalent (reversible) Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi). Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) were treated with fixed-duration pirtobrutinib plus venetoclax (PV) or pirtobrutinib plus venetoclax and rituximab (PVR) in this phase 1b trial. Prior covalent BTKi therapy was allowed, but not prior treatment with venetoclax. Patients were assigned to receive PV (n = 15) or PVR (n = 10) for 25 cycles. Most patients (68%) had received prior covalent BTKi therapy. At the data cutoff date, the median time on study was 27.0 months for PV and 23.3 months for PVR. Overall response rates were 93.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68.1-99.8) for PV and 100% (95% CI, 69.2-100.0) for PVR, with 10 complete responses (PV: 7; PVR: 3). After 12 cycles of treatment, 85.7% (95% CI, 57.2-98.2) of PV and 90.0% (95% CI, 55.5-99.7) of PVR patients achieved undetectable minimal residual disease (<10-4) in peripheral blood. Progression-free survival at 18 months was 92.9% (95% CI, 59.1-99.0) for PV patients and 80.0% (95% CI, 40.9-94.6) for PVR patients. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed during the 5-week assessment period. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) for all patients included neutropenia (52%) and anemia (16%). AEs led to dose reduction in 3 patients and discontinuation in 2. In conclusion, fixed-duration PV or PVR was well tolerated and had promising efficacy in patients with R/R CLL, including patients previously treated with a covalent BTKi. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03740529., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Background: No comprehensive meta-analysis has evaluated the efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin compared to a placebo in patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2D) until now. This meta-analysis fills this gap in knowledge. Methods: A systematic search was carried out in electronic databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included patients with T2D receiving ertugliflozin in the treatment group and placebo in the control group. The change in HbA1c from the baseline values was the primary outcome, whereas changes in plasma glucose and other metabolic parameters and adverse events (AEs), including hypoglycemia, were the secondary outcomes. Results: Seven RCTs involving 7283 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Ertugliflozin outperformed placebo in reducing HbA1c in both 5 mg (MD -0.62%, 95% CI [-0.80, -0.44], p < 0.00001, I 2 = 91%) and 15 mg (MD -0.69%, 95% CI [-0.91, -0.47], p < 0.00001, I 2 = 93%) doses. A higher proportion of patients achieved HbA1c < 7.0% with ertugliflozin than with placebo. Ertugliflozin was also superior to placebo in lowering fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body weight, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP). Ertugliflozin and placebo had comparable AE profiles, including urinary tract infection (UTI) and hypoglycemia, except for the greater risk of genital mycotic infections (GMIs) with ertugliflozin. Ertugliflozin 5 and 15 mg have equivalent efficacy and safety profiles except for greater weight reduction with ertugliflozin 15 mg. Conclusion: Ertugliflozin has a good glycemic efficacy and a reassuring safety profile in managing T2D. Trial Registration: Registration number: CRD42023456450., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 A. B. M. Kamrul-Hasan et al.)

Abstract: Although intensive induction chemotherapy (IC) remains the standard of care for younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), hypomethylating agents + venetoclax (HMA/VEN) can lead to durable remission among older patients with nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) mutations. Whether IC or HMA/VEN is superior in patients aged ≥60 years with NPM1-mutant AML is unknown. We performed an international, multicenter retrospective cohort study of 221 patients (147 IC and 74 HMA/VEN) with previously untreated NPM1-mutant AML. Composite complete remission (cCR) (defined as CR + CR with incomplete count recovery) rate was similar for IC and HMA/VEN (cCR, 85% vs 74%; P = .067). Although overall survival (OS) was favorable with IC in unselected patients compared with HMA/VEN (24-month OS, 59% [95% confidence interval (CI), 52-69%] vs 38% [95% CI, 27-55%]; P = .013), it was not statistically different among patients aged 60-75 years (60% [95% CI, 52-70%] vs 44% [95% CI, 29-66%]; P = .069) and patients who received an allogeneic stem cell transplant (70% [95% CI, 58-85%] vs 66% [95% CI, 44-100%]; P = .56). Subgroup analyses suggested that patients with normal cytogenetics (24-month OS, 65% [95% CI, 56-74%] with IC vs 40% [95% CI, 26-60%] with HMA/VEN; P = .009) and without FLT3 internal tandem duplication mutations might benefit from IC compared with HMA/VEN (24-month OS, 68% [95% CI, 59-79%] vs 43% [95% CI, 29-63%]; P = .008). In multivariable analysis, OS was not statistically different between patients treated with IC and HMA/VEN (hazard ratio for death with HMA/VEN vs IC, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.40-1.27; P = .25)., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Purpose: There are no effective treatment options for patients with aggressive epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) driven by the TAZ-CAMTA1 (TC) fusion gene. Here, we aimed to understand the regulation of TC using pharmacologic tools and identify vulnerabilities that can potentially be exploited for the treatment of EHE., Experimental Design: TC is a transcriptional coregulator; we hypothesized that compounds that reduce TC nuclear levels, either through translocation of TC to the cytoplasm, or through degradation, would render TC less oncogenic. TC localization was monitored using immunofluorescence in an EHE tumor cell line. Two target-selective libraries were used to identify small molecules that reduce TC localization in the nucleus. The ability of the shortlisted hits to affect cell viability, apoptosis, and tumorigenesis was also evaluated., Results: Basal TC remained "immobile" in the nucleus; administration of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors such as CGP60474 and dinaciclib (Dina) mobilized TC. "Mobile" TC shuttled between the nucleus and cytoplasm; however, it was eventually degraded through proteasomes. This dramatically suppressed the levels of TC-regulated transcripts and cell viability, promoted apoptosis, and reduced the area of metastatic lesions in the allograft model of EHE. We specifically identified that the inhibition of CDK9, a transcriptional CDK, destabilizes TC., Conclusions: The CDK inhibitor Dina exhibited antitumorigenic properties both in vitro and in vivo in EHE models. Dina has been rigorously tested in clinical trials and displayed an acceptable toxicity profile. Therefore, there is a potential therapeutic window for repurposing Dina for the treatment of EHE., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Abstract: This phase 1b study evaluated safety and efficacy of acalabrutinib, venetoclax, and rituximab (AVR) in treatment-naive mantle cell lymphoma (TN MCL). Patients received acalabrutinib from cycle 1 until progressive disease (PD) or undue toxicity, rituximab for 6 cycles with maintenance every other cycle through cycle 24 or until PD, and venetoclax, beginning at cycle 2, for 24 cycles. Twenty-one patients were enrolled; 95.2% completed induction (6 AVR cycles) and 47.6% continued acalabrutinib maintenance. Thirteen (61.9%) patients had grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs), most commonly neutropenia (33.3%). Seven (33.3%) patients had COVID-19 infection (6 [28.6%] serious AEs and 5 [23.8%] deaths, all among unvaccinated patients). There was no grade ≥3 atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, major hemorrhages, or tumor lysis syndrome. Overall response rate (ORR) was 100% (95% CI, 83.9-100.0) with 71.4% complete response. With median follow-up of 27.8 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. PFS rates at 1 and 2 years were 90.5% (95% CI, 67.0-97.5) and 63.2% (95% CI, 34.7-82.0), respectively; both were 95% after censoring COVID-19 deaths. OS rates at 1 and 2 years were 95.2% (95% CI, 70.7-99.3) and 75.2% (95% CI, 50.3-88.9), respectively; both were 100% after censoring COVID-19 deaths. Overall, 87.5% of patients with available minimal residual disease (MRD) data achieved MRD negativity (10-6; next-generation sequencing) during treatment. AVR represents a chemotherapy-free regimen for TN MCL and resulted in high ORR and high rates of MRD negativity. The trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02717624., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Background: Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) and the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitor venetoclax have significantly improved outcomes and achieved durable remission in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). BTKi/venetoclax-treated patients with exposure to both novel agents (regardless of the reason for discontinuation) are classified as "double-exposed," and often have poor prognoses. This study aims to assess the efficacy and effectiveness of treatments in double-exposed CLL patients., Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched until December 2023., Results: We retrieved 3948 articles for screening and included 13 publications covering nine distinct studies. Three clinical trials reported a median PFS of 16.8 months with pirtobrutinib, 13 months with lisocabtagene maraleucel, and 10.1 months with nemtabrutnib. ORR ranged from 58% with nemtabrutinib and 80% with lisocabtagene maraleucel. In observational studies, PFS ranged from 3 months with chemoimmunotherapy to 12 months with BTKi, and ORR ranged from 31.8% with chemoimmunotherapy to 85.7% with chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) T-cell therapy., Conclusion: This study highlights the limited clinical data on efficacy outcomes for double-exposed CLL/SLL patients. Pirtobrutinib, lisocabtagene maraleucel, and a combination of ibrutinib and venetoclax have shown promising effects. However, the scarcity of treatment options and efficacy data for patients who have failed BTKi and venetoclax underscores a significant unmet medical need., (© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aims: Opioid use disorder (OUD) remains a serious public health problem. Opioid maintenance treatment is effective but under-utilized, hard to access under existing federal regulations, and, once patients achieve OUD stability, challenging to discontinue. Fewer than 2% of persons with OUD stop using opioids completely. There have been calls from public advocacy groups, governmental agencies, and public health officials for new treatments for OUD. Dezocine, a non-scheduled opioid previously used in the United States and currently widely prescribed in China for pain management, could be a candidate for a novel OUD treatment medication in the U.S. Nonetheless, to date, there have been no reviews of the clinical and preclinical literature detailing dezocine's abuse potential, a key consideration in assessing its clinical utility., Discussion: There are no English language reports of human abuse, dependence, or overdose of dezocine, despite years of extensive clinical use. There are a few case reports of dezocine abuse in the Chinese literature, but there are no reports of overdose deaths. Dezocine is perceived as an opioid and is "liked" by opioid-experienced human and non-human primates, properties that are not dose-dependent and are mitigated by ceiling effects-higher doses do not result in more "liking." There is little withdrawal, spontaneous or precipitated, in humans, monkeys, rats, or mice treated chronically with dezocine alone. However, at some doses, dezocine can precipitate withdrawal in humans and monkeys dependent on other opioids. In rodents, dezocine reduces the severity of morphine withdrawal and the rewarding properties of other opioids., Conclusions: Although dezocine is reinforcing in humans and monkeys with prior or concurrent opioid use within a restricted dose range, there are only a few anecdotal reports of dezocine abuse despite of the long history of use in humans. Given the evidence of dezocine's limited abuse potential, it could be useful both as a treatment for OUD. However, in-depth studies would be required for dezocine to be re-considered for clinical use., (© 2024 The Author(s). CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Azacitidine/venetoclax is an active regimen in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, primary or secondary resistance to azacitidine/venetoclax is an area of unmet need and overexpression of MCL1 is suggested to be a potential resistance mechanism. Pevonedistat inhibits MCL1 through activation of NOXA, and pevonedistat/azacitidine has previously shown activity in AML. To assess the tolerability and efficacy of adding pevonedistat to azacitidine/ venetoclax in relapsed/refractory AML, we conducted a phase I, multicenter, open-label study in 16 adults with relapsed/ refractory AML. Patients were treated with azacitidine, venetoclax along with pevonedistat intravenously on days 1, 3 and 5 of each 28-day cycle at doses of 10, 15 or 20 mg/m2 in successive cohorts in the dose escalation phase. The impact of treatment on protein neddylation as well as expression of pro-apoptotic BCL2 family members was assessed. The recommended phase II dose of pevonedistat was 20 mg/m2. Grade 3 or higher adverse events included neutropenia (31%), thrombocytopenia (13%), febrile neutropenia (19%), anemia (19%), hypertension (19%) and sepsis (19%). The overall response rate was 46.7% for the whole cohort including complete remission in five of seven (71.4%) patients who had not previously been treated with the hypomethylating agent/venetoclax. No measurable residual disease was detected in 80.0% of the patients who achieved complete remission. The median time to best response was 50 (range, 23-77) days. Four patients were bridged to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The combination of azacitidine, venetoclax and pevonedistat is safe and shows encouraging preliminary activity in patients with relapsed/refractory AML. (NCT04172844).

FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutations occur in approximately one third of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. FLT3-Internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutations are the most common FLT3 mutations and are associated with a poor prognosis. Gilteritinib is a FLT3 inhibitor that is US FDA approved for treating adult patients with relapsed/refractory AML and a FLT3 mutation. While gilteritinib monotherapy has improved patient outcome, few patients achieve durable responses. Combining gilteritinib with venetoclax (VEN) appears to make further improvements, though early results suggest that patients with prior exposure to VEN fair much worse than those without prior exposure. MRX-2843 is a promising inhibitor of FLT3 and MERTK. We recently demonstrated that MRX-2843 is equally potent as gilteritinib in FLT3-ITD AML cell lines in vitro and primary patient samples ex vivo. In this study, we investigated the combination of VEN and MRX-2843 against FLT3-ITD AML cells. We found that VEN synergistically enhances cell death induced by MRX-2843 in FLT3-mutated AML cell lines and primary patient samples. Importantly, we found that VEN synergistically enhances cell death induced by MRX-2843 in FLT3-ITD AML cells with acquired resistance to cytarabine (AraC) or VEN+AraC. VEN and MRX-2843 significantly reduce colony-forming capacity of FLT3-ITD primary AML cells. Mechanistic studies show that MRX-2843 decreases Mcl-1 and c-Myc protein levels via transcriptional regulation and combined MRX-2843 and VEN significantly decreases oxidative phosphorylation in FLT3-ITD AML cells. Our findings highlight a promising combination therapy against FLT3-ITD AML, supporting further in vitro and in vivo testing., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Patients with FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) that relapse or are refractory (R/R) to intensive induction have poor outcomes. Gilteritinib has recently become standard-of-care for patients with R/R FLT3-mutated AML. We investigated whether adding venetoclax to gilteritinib (gilt-ven) improves outcomes as compared with gilteritinib monotherapy. We included patients treated with gilteritinib (n = 19) and gilt-ven (n = 17) for R/R AML after intensive chemotherapy. Gilteritinib and gilt-ven groups did not differ in terms of mCRc rates (53% and 65%, p = 0.51) and realization of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT, 47% and 35%, p = 0.5). Overall survival (OS) was comparable between groups, although a trend towards better OS was seen with gilt-ven (12-month OS 58.8% [95% CI 39.5%-87.6%]) versus gilteritinib (42.1% [95% CI 24.9%-71.3%] for gilteritinib). Early salvage with gilt-ven versus any other gilteritinib-based approach was associated with the best outcome (p = 0.031). Combination therapy was associated with increased haematological toxicity. In summary, gilt-ven did not improve remissions or HSCT-realization rates in patients with R/R FLT3-mutated AML as compared with gilteritinib and was associated with increased haematological toxicity. Although OS did not differ, a trend towards better survival was suggested with gilt-ven and a survival benefit was shown for gilt-ven approach when sequenced early for salvage., (© 2024 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)