Search

Background: Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) often provokes dramatic consequences in terms of increased morbi-mortality. Two medications have mainly been worldwide used for OUD (MOUD), buprenorphine and methadone. Recently, however, some reports have highlighted the use of Morphine Sulfate (MS) mainly obtained without a prescription but used as MOUD by opioid users and especially People Who Inject Substances (PWIS). We propose to characterize the prevalence and distribution of MOUD and MS use in PWIS. Methods: This study examines the use of MOUD and MS amongst French PWIS recruited in harm reduction facilities and drug consumption rooms in the context of the COSINUS (Cohort to assess structural and individual factors in drug use) study. Results: MOUD are prescribed, respectively, to one-third and one-fifth of PWIS, whereas a half of them declared MS consumption without prescription. MS users live with higher precariousness and are younger than non-users. MS is associated with salt cocaine and heroin use. It is often consumed with methadone and more rarely with buprenorphine and we hypothesized that this is probably linked to buprenorphine's pharmacological antagonism. Discussion: Our results show the high prevalence of MS consumption and highlight the importance of considering the highly restricted possibility of prescribing MS as MOUD. Its association with methadone raises the question of their synergistic action on craving and mental disorders. The profiles of opioid users who could benefit from MS with or without methadone must be examined to improve their care but with the utmost caution, given the risk of overdose. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of drug consumption rooms (DCRs) in France on injection equipment‐sharing, while the secondary aims focused upon their impact on access to hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing and opioid agonist treatment (OAT). Design: The COhort to identify Structural and INdividual factors associated with drug USe (COSINUS cohort) was a 12‐month longitudinal study of 665 people who inject drugs (PWID), conducted in Bordeaux, Marseille, Paris and Strasbourg. We used data from face‐to‐face interviews at enrolment and at 6‐month and 12‐month visits. Setting and participants: The participants were recruited in harm reduction programmes in Bordeaux and Marseille and in DCRs in Strasbourg and Paris. Participants were aged more than 18 years, French‐speaking and had injected substances the month before enrolment. Measurements We measured the impact of DCR exposure on injection equipment sharing, HCV testing and the use of medications for opioid use disorder, after adjustment for significant correlates. We used a two‐step Heckman mixed‐effects probit model, which allowed us to take into account the correlation of repeated measures and to control for potential bias due to non‐randomization between the two groups (DCR‐exposed versus DCR‐unexposed participants). Findings The difference of declared injection equipment sharing between PWID exposed to DCRs versus non‐exposed was 10% (1% for those exposed versus 11% for those non‐exposed, marginal effect = −0.10; 95% confidence interval = −0.18, −0.03); there was no impact of DCRs on HCV testing and OAT. Conclusions: In the French context, drug consumption rooms appear to have a positive impact on at‐risk practices for infectious diseases such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]