Search

Implementation efforts to increase adoption of health technologies (e.g., telehealth, mobile health, electronic health records, patient portals) have commonly focused on increasing the adoption of specific health technologies in specific service lines. To facilitate adoption of multiple health technologies across a hospital setting, four Virtual Health Resource Centers (VHRCs) were established to provide clinical adoption support to healthcare staff and patients in four hospitals in a large healthcare system. This study spanned a 3-year period, with the first half including pre-implementation efforts, and the second half involved in implementation efforts. In order to compare sites to the national population, a binomial regression was used which allowed for adjustment of relevant covariates (e.g., differences in number of enrollees, level of complexity of facility). The pre-implementation phase and the initial year-and-a-half of the implementation phase resulted in an increase in internal facilitators' knowledge and skills of virtual care technologies, an increase in facilitator and site capacity, and high levels of adherence to implementation strategies were maintained across sites. Virtual care utilization increased across all sites and across the healthcare system during the implementation phase; however, a comparison to the increase in national level virtual care utilization metrics yielded no meaningful difference. While many implementation strategies aim to increase the adoption of a particular health technology product (e.g., a particular app or remote monitoring use case), the establishment of VHRCs may increase efficiencies in delivery of virtual care training and consultation to healthcare staff and patients, which may increase capacity and decrease barriers to adoption. However, due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the need for rapid adoption of technology and decreased in person care and services, it is not yet known the longer term impact that the establishment of VHRCs may have on the sustained adoption of health technologies.

Coping with stressors related to the coronavirus disease (COVID) pandemic has caused major mental health challenges. Text message interventions are identified as helpful for promoting health behavior self-management. Drawing from cognitive-behavioral theory (CBT), U.S. Veterans Health Administration staff developed a 20-week automated text messaging protocol called "Coping During COVID" to support veterans' self-care during the pandemic. This project evaluated attitudes about and perceived helpfulness of the protocol among 651 veterans. A cross-sectional evaluation quantitatively assessed COVID-related stressors as well as reported use, acceptability, attitudes, and perceived helpfulness of the protocol via a self-administered online questionnaire. Open-ended questions assessed perceived helpfulness/unhelpfulness of the protocol. Of the 651 veterans (22% of those enrolled in the protocol) who responded to the survey, 73.1% were male and 88.5% were 50 years or over. Ninety percent found the protocol messages helpful and about half endorsed various additional benefits, including feeling better, being more educated about coping behaviors, and being better able to focus on positive thoughts. Qualitative feedback was overwhelmingly positive. For example, veterans stated that the protocol "was like having a personal coach giving hints and tips to cope with the boredom every day," that it "gave me reminders of skills I was not using. It helped me focus on the positives," and brought relief from "many hopeless and sad thoughts … the messages from Annie have been a Godsend to me." Overall results suggested that the Coping During COVID text messaging protocol successfully supported the majority of respondents' self-care efforts during the COVID pandemic. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

BACKGROUND The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is deploying an automated texting system (aTS) to support patient self-management. OBJECTIVE We conducted a qualitative evaluation to examine factors influencing national rollout of the aTS, guided by the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework, which is intended to support the evaluation of novel technologies. METHODS Semistructured interviews were conducted with 33 staff and 38 patients who were early adopters of the aTS. Data were analyzed following deductive and inductive approaches using a priori codes and emergent coding based on the NASSS. RESULTS We identified themes across NASSS domains: (1) Condition: The aTS was considered relevant for a range of patient needs; however, perceptions of patient suitability were guided by texting experience and clinical complexity rather than potential benefits. (2) Technology: Onboarding of the aTS presented difficulty and the staff had different opinions on incorporating patient-generated data into care planning. (3) Value: Supply-side value relied on the flexibility of the aTS and its impact on staff workload whereas demand-side value was driven by patient perceptions of the psychological and behavioral impacts of the aTS. (4) Adopters: Limited clarity on staff roles and responsibilities presented challenges in incorporating the aTS into clinical processes. (5) Organization: Staff were willing to try the aTS; however, perceptions of leadership support and clinic readiness hindered usage. (6) Wider system: Staff focused on enhancing aTS interoperability with the electronic medical record. (7) Embedding and adaptation over time: The interplay of aTS versatility, patient and staff demands, and broader societal changes in preferences for communicating health information facilitated aTS implementation. CONCLUSIONS VHA’s new aTS has the potential to further engage patients and expand the reach of VHA care; however, patients and staff require additional support to adopt, implement, and sustain the aTS. The NASSS highlighted how the aTS can be better embedded into current practices, which patients might benefit most from its functionality, and which aspects of aTS messages are most relevant to self-management. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03898349; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03898349

The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is using an automated short message service application named “Annie” as part of its coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) response with a protocol for coronavirus precautions, which can help the veteran monitor symptoms and can advise the veteran when to contact his or her VA care team or a nurse triage line. We surveyed 1134 veterans on their use of the Annie application and coronavirus precautions protocol. Survey results support what is likely a substantial resource savings for the VA, as well as non-VA community healthcare. Moreover, the majority of veterans reported at least 1 positive sentiment (felt more connected to VA, confident, or educated and/or felt less anxious) by receiving the protocol messages. The findings from this study have implications for other healthcare systems to help manage a patient population during the coronavirus pandemic.

Background Clinical care team members in Department of Veterans' Affairs (VA) facilities nationwide are working to integrate the use of Secure Messaging (SM) into care delivery and identify innovative uses. Identifying best practices for proactive use of SM is a key factor in its successful implementation and sustained use by VA clinical care team members and veterans. Objectives A collaborative project solicited input from VA clinical care teams about their local practices using SM to provide access to proactive patient-centered care for veterans and enhance workflow. Methods This project implemented a single-item cross-sectional qualitative electronic survey via internal e-mail to local coordinators in all 23 Veterans Integrated Service Networks (VISNs). Content analysis was used to manage descriptive data responses. Descriptive statistics described sample characteristics. Results VA clinical care team members across 15 of 23 VISNs responded to the questionnaire. Content analysis of 171 responses produced two global domains: (1) benefits of SM and (2) SM best practices. Benefits of SM use emphasize enhanced and efficient communication and increased access to care. Care team members incorporate SM into their daily clinical practices, using it to provide services before, during, and after clinical encounters as a best practice. SM users suggest improvements in veteran care, clinical team workflow, and efficient use of health resources. Clinical team members invested in the successful implementation of SM integrate SM into their daily practices to provide meaningful and useful veteran-centered care and improve workflow. Conclusion VA clinical care team members can use SM proactively to create an integrated SM culture. With adequate knowledge and motivation to proactively use this technology, all clinical team members within the VA system can replicate best practices shared by other clinical care teams to generate meaningful and useful interactions with SM to enrich veterans' health care experience.

Information continuity is critical to person-centered care when patients receive care from multiple healthcare systems. Patients can access their electronic health record data through patient portals to facilitate information exchange. This pilot was developed to improve care continuity for rural Veterans by (1) promoting the use of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) patient portal to share health information with non-VA providers, and (2) evaluating the impact of health information sharing at a community appointment.Veterans from nine VA healthcare systems were trained to access and share their VA Continuity of Care Document (CCD) with their non-VA providers. Patients and non-VA providers completed surveys on their experiences.Participants (n = 620) were primarily older, white, and Vietnam era Veterans. After training, 78% reported the CCD would help them be more involved in their healthcare and 86% planned to share it regularly with non-VA providers. Veterans (n = 256) then attended 277 community appointments. Provider responses from these appointments (n = 133) indicated they were confident in the accuracy of the information (97%) and wanted to continue to receive the CCD (96%). Ninety percent of providers reported the CCD improved their ability to have an accurate medication list and helped them make medication treatment decisions. Fifty percent reported they did not order a laboratory test or another procedure because of information available in the CCD.This pilot demonstrates feasibility and value of patient access to a CCD to facilitate information sharing between VA and non-VA providers. Outreach and targeted education are needed to promote consumer-mediated health information exchange.