Search

ImportanceThe association of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) interventions of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) and intravitreal injections (IVIs) with tractional retinal detachment (TRD) is unclear.ObjectivesTo determine whether different treatment types or a 6-month or longer period of loss to follow-up (LTFU) is associated with TRD.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis nested case-control study included data from January 1, 2000, to June 30, 2021, of patients with PDR. Those who progressed to TRD were matched to non-TRD controls up to a 5:1 ratio. Exclusion criteria included 2 or fewer years in the plan, history of nondiabetic retinopathy, vitreous hemorrhage, previous RD, or any other surgically indicated diagnosis. Patient data were obtained from a deidentified commercial and Medicare Advantage medical claims database. Statistical analysis was performed from January to May 2022.ExposuresPrimary exposures of interest were prior treatment (PRP, IVI, both) and any period of 6 months or longer in which the patient received no eye care.Main Outcomes and MeasuresOdds ratios (ORs) of IVI only compared with PRP and 6-month or longer LTFU on development of TRD.ResultsAfter application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 214 patients (mean [SD] age, 55.6 [12.4] years; 115 female [53.7%]) with PDR and TRD were matched to 978 controls (mean [SD] age, 65.6 [11.3] years; 507 female [51.8%]) with only PDR. Among patients with TRD, 69 (32.2%) were treated with laser only, 17 (7.9%) were treated with injection only, 39 (18.2%) were treated with both, and 89 (41.6%) had no prior treatment. Among patients in the PDR-only group, 207 (21.2%) received laser only, 83 (8.5%) received injection only, 57 (5.8%) received both, and 631 (64.5%) received no treatment. After adjusted analysis, no difference in odds of TRD for patients who received injection only compared with patients who received laser only was found (adjusted OR [aOR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.27-1.14). Patients who received both treatments had higher odds of TRD compared with those who received laser only (aOR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.21-4.48), and patients who had no treatment had lower odds of TRD (aOR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29-0.71; P P = .11).Conclusions and RelevanceResults of this case-control analysis suggest that there is no increased risk of TRD associated with IVI-only treatment or with 6-month or longer periods of LTFU, which supports the findings of other investigations. Nonetheless, LTFU rates continue to remain high in patients with PDR, which can contribute to substantial vision loss regardless of treatment regimen.

To assess systemic associations of angioid streaks (AS) using a large US healthcare database.A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted of patients diagnosed with AS in a large, national US insurer from 2000-2019. Cases were matched 1:5 to controls. The prevalence rates of established associated disease states and other systemic diseases were calculated and compared using logistic regression. Additionally, the rate of anti-VEGF treatment was assessed as a proxy for the incidence of choroidal neovascularization (CNV).One thousand eight hundred fifty-two cases of AS and 9028 matched controls were included. The rates of association between AS and the well-characterized conditions included: Pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE)-228 patients (12.3%), Ehlers-Danlos syndrome-18 patients (1.0%), Paget's disease-6 patients (0.3%), hemoglobinopathies-30 patients (1.6%), and idiopathic-1573 patients (84.9%). There was a statistically higher prevalence of the following less classically associated diseases among patients with AS compared to controls: hereditary spherocytosis (1.7% vs. 0.6%, p 0.001), connective tissue disease (1.0% vs 0.3%, p 0.001) and non-exudative age-related macular degeneration (33.9% vs 10.6%, p 0.001). Among 1442 eligible cases analyzed, 427 (29.6%) received at least 1 anti-VEGF injection with 338 (23.4%) patients having the injection after their AS diagnosis.In the largest collection of AS patients to date, the classical teaching of systemic disease associations occur at rates far, far lower than previously reported. The association of AS with other less reported diseases highlights new potential associations and may contribute to the understanding of AS formation.

PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the effect of statins on progression from non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) to vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) or diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: Two cohort studies using a US medical claims database from 2002–2019 including NPDR patients 18 years or older. A risk factor analysis performed a time-updating cox regression model assessing statin usage. A second new-user active comparator design analysis replicating a previously published study. Main outcomes included a new diagnosis of VTDR (composite of either PDR or DME) or DME and PDR individually for the risk factor study and included additional outcomes of new DR, NPDR, vitreous hemorrhage (VH) and tractional retinal detachment (TRD) for the new user study. RESULTS: Risk factor analysis included 66,617 statin users with NPDR at baseline and 83,365 non-statin users. Of these, 27,325(18.2%) progressed to VTDR, 4,086(2.71%) progressed to PDR, and 22,750(15.1%) progressed to DME. After multivariable analysis, no protective effect of statin use was found for progression to VTDR, PDR, or DME (HR=1.01–3, p>0.33 for all comparisons). Replicated new user design analysis also showed no protective effect for statins on risk of development of DR(HR=1.03, 95%CI:0.99–1.07, p=0.13), PDR(HR=0.89, 95%CI:0.79–1.02, p=0.09), DME(HR=0.94, 95%CI:0.86–1.03, p=0.21), VH(HR=1.00, 95%CI:0.86–1.16, p=0.99), and TRD(HR=1.11, 95%CI:0.89–1.38, p=0.36). CONCLUSION: Statin use was found not to be protective for progression of DR regardless of study methodology. These results suggest that the specifics of the population studied rather than differing study methodology are important in assessing the effect of statins on DR progression.

Purpose To determine frequency of hypercoagulability testing and hypercoagulable states in patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) younger than 50 years. Design Retrospective cohort study. Participants Deidentified patients younger than 50 years with newly diagnosed CRVO from a national insurance claims database. Methods The de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (Optum) containing medical claims from a commercial and Medicare Advantage insurance database was used. All outpatient medical claims (office visits, associated diagnoses, and laboratory testing) and demographic data for each beneficiary during their enrollment were accessible. Main Outcome Measures Prevalence of (1) laboratory hypercoagulable workup within 90 days of CRVO diagnosis, (2) new diagnosis of a hypercoagulable state within 1 year of CRVO diagnosis, and (3) diagnosis of hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), and hyperlipidemia. Results One thousand one hundred eighty-one patients met inclusion criteria. Six hundred seventy-one patients (56.8%) were men, 450 patients (38.1%) had undergone hypercoagulable testing within 90 days, and 136 patients (11.5%) were diagnosed with a hypercoagulable state within 1 year after CRVO diagnosis. This proportion was similar between those patients with DM, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia (10.5% [65/620]) and those without (12.7% [71/561]; P = 0.28). Of the 136 patients diagnosed with a hypercoagulability state, 68.4% (93/136) had undergone testing within 90 days of CRVO diagnosis and 31.6% (43/136) did not. Of those who had not undergone hypercoagulability testing, 5.9% (43/731) were diagnosed with a hypercoagulable state within 1 year compared with 20.7% (93/450) in those who were tested (P Conclusions The prevalence of a hypercoagulable state within 1 year of CRVO diagnosis in patients younger than 50 years was 11.5%, and the prevalence was similar between patients with atherosclerotic risk factors and those without. Rate of testing was only 38.1%. Future research should examine the usefulness of uniform hypercoagulable testing in young CRVO patients.

Purpose Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is increasingly performed at the time of cataract extraction. Understanding the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients undergoing MIGS procedures may provide insight into patient selection. This study evaluates racial-ethnic and other differences in the use of MIGS in persons with cataract and open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Design Retrospective cohort study using Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS) Registry data. Participants Patients aged ≥ 40 years with a diagnosis of OAG and no history of MIGS or cataract surgery who were undergoing cataract extraction, with or without MIGS, during 2013 to 2017 in the United States. Methods Multivariable logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Main Outcome Measures Variables assessed include age, sex, race-ethnicity, disease severity, insurance type, census region, comorbidity, and cup-to-disc ratio (CDR). Results The odds of MIGS use was greater among patients who were aged ≥ 60 years (OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.05–1.16]); Black (OR, 1.11 [CI, 1.07–1.15]) compared with White; a Medicare recipient (OR, 1.12 [CI, 1.10–1.15]) versus privately insured; or in the Midwest (OR, 1.32 [CI, 1.28–1.36]) or Northeast (OR, 1.26 [CI, 1.22–1.30]) compared with the South. Having moderate rather than mild glaucoma (OR, 1.07 [CI, 1.04–1.11]) and a higher CDR (OR for 0.5 to 0.8 vs. 0.8 to 1.0 vs. Conclusions This analysis highlights the importance of capturing race-ethnicity data and other pertinent patient characteristics in electronic health records to provide insight into practice patterns. Such data can be used to assess the long-term performance of MIGS and other procedures in various patient populations.

Purpose: This report aims to describe a case of bilateral, multifocal neurosensory retinal detachments that developed during erdafitinib therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Methods: A case report with color fundus imaging and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography imaging is presented. Results: A 50-year-old man with metastatic urothelial carcinoma had an unremarkable baseline ophthalmic examination prior to starting erdafitinib. At 3-month follow up, an examination revealed bilateral, multifocal retinal detachments. Because the patient was asymptomatic and erdafitinib was the only drug to which his tumor had responded, he was kept on the medication with close ophthalmic monitoring. Conclusions: Erdafitinib, a fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor, can cause bilateral, multifocal retinal detachments. Continuation of erdafitinib may be considered in patients without significant visual impairment when the overall benefit of the medication appears to outweigh the risks.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the near-term risk of stroke following a retinal artery occlusion (RAO). METHODS: The risk of stroke was assessed in two manners; with a self-controlled case series (SCCS) and a propensity score (PS) matched cohort study using a US medical claims database. The date of RAO diagnosis was assigned as the index date. In the SCCS, incidence of stroke was compared in 30- and 7-day periods pre- and post-index date. In PS analysis, matched cohorts were created from patients with RAO or hip fracture. Cox proportional hazard regression assessed the hazard for stroke. Patients were censored at 1 year, upon leaving the insurance plan or if they had a qualifying event for the comparison group. RESULTS: The SCCS included 16,193 patients with RAO. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) of new stroke in the month after RAO was increased compared to all periods >2 months before and all months after the index date (IRRs: 1.68–6.40, p

PURPOSE: To determine if metformin is associated with non-infectious uveitis (NIU). METHODS: Patients in an insurance claims database who initiated metformin (n=359,139) or other oral anti-diabetic medications (n=162,847) were followed for NIU development. Both cohort and case-control analyses were performed to assess differing exposure lengths using Cox and conditional logistic regression, respectively. RESULTS: The hazard ratio (HR) for incident NIU was not significantly different between the metformin and non-metformin cohorts [HR=1.19, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.92-1.54, P=0.19]. The case-control analysis similarly showed no association between any metformin use 2 years before the outcome date and NIU [Odds ratio (OR)=0.64, 95% CI: 0.39-1.04, P=0.07]. However, there was a protective association between cumulative metformin duration [445-729 days adjusted OR (aOR)=0.49, 95% CI: 0.27-0.90, P=0.02) and dosage (>390,000 mg aOR=0.44, 95% CI: 0.25-0.78, P=0.001] compared with no metformin use. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest metformin use for longer durations may be protective of NIU onset.

Purpose To determine if female hormonal therapy (FHT) increases the incidence of noninfectious uveitis. Design Retrospective cohort study. Participants Women exposed to FHT and matched women unexposed to FHT enrolled in a national insurance plan. Methods Estimation of noninfectious uveitis incidence used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. To account for differences between the exposed and unexposed cohorts, a propensity score for being prescribed FHT was created using logistic regression, and inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed. Main Outcome Measures Incidence of noninfectious uveitis. For the primary outcome, incident noninfectious uveitis was defined as a new diagnosis code for noninfectious uveitis followed by a second instance of a noninfectious uveitis code within 120 days. For the alternative outcome definition, a corticosteroid prescription or code for an ocular corticosteroid injection within 120 days of the uveitis diagnosis code was used instead of the second uveitis diagnosis code. Results There were 217 653 women exposed to FHT and 928 408 women not unexposed to FHT. For the primary outcome, the hazard ratio (HR) for incident noninfectious uveitis was not significantly different between the FHT and unexposed cohorts (HR, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83–1.17; P = 0.87). With the alternative outcome definition, the FHT cohort was more likely to develop uveitis (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.04–1.41; P = 0.01). When examined by anatomic subtype, for anterior uveitis there was a greater likelihood of incident uveitis in the exposed cohort (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.05–1.45; P = 0.01) for the alternative outcome definition but not for the primary outcome. With age stratification, women exposed to FHT aged ≥45 years at the time of FHT prescription were more likely to develop uveitis (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.03–1.47; P = 0.03) for the alternative outcome definition. A similar HR (1.22) was seen for women aged ≤44 years at the time of prescription, but this association did not meet statistical significance (P = 0.20). Conclusions Exposure to FHT increases the rate of incident noninfectious uveitis when uveitis is defined on the basis of both diagnostic codes and documentation of corticosteroid treatment. However, the risk is modest and FHT is likely safe with regard to noninfectious uveitis risk in the majority of patients exposed to these drugs.

AimTo determine if checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) confer an increased risk of non-infectious uveitis or myasthenia gravis (MG) compared to patients on non-checkpoint inhibitor (N-CPI) chemotherapy.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed comparing patients in a large commercial and Medicare advantage database exposed to CPI compared to N-CPI. All patients who initiated a CPI (ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab, avelumab, cemiplimab and durvalumab) were eligible. Date of earliest CPI in the exposure group and N-CPI chemotherapy in the comparator group was considered the index date. Exclusion occurred in both cohorts for any history of uveitis or MG diagnosis and having ResultsFor evaluation of incidence of non-infectious uveitis, 26 (0.3%) of 8678 patients on CPI and 123 (0.2%) of 76 153 N-CPI comparators were found to have non-infectious uveitis. After multivariate analysis, CPIs showed an increased hazard for uveitis compared to N-CPI (HR=2.09; 95% CI 1.36 to 3.22, p=0.001). For the MG analysis, 11 (0.1%) of 9210 patients developed MG in the CPI group and 36 (0.04%) of 80 620 comparators. The CPI cohort had a higher hazard of developing MG (HR=2.60; 95% CI 1.34 to 5.07, p=0.005) compared to controls in multivariate analysis.ConclusionsExposure to CPI confers a higher risk for non-infectious uveitis and MG compared to N-CPI chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To quantify the association between visit adherence and visual acuity (VA) in diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: This secondary analysis of the 2-year DRCRnet Protocol T study of 656 patients required one visit every 4 weeks in the first year, then at variable 4-16 week intervals in the second year. Visit adherence measured as: number of missed visits, average (avg days) and longest (max days) visit interval, average (avg missed days) and longest (max missed days) unintended visit interval, and visit constancy (percentage of 3-month periods with at least 1 visit). Avg and max missed days were categorized as on time(0 days), late(>0-60 days), and very late(>60 days). Primary outcome was change in ETDRS VA between baseline study visit and last attended visit, using multivariate linear regression models controlling for age, gender, race, ethnicity, treatment arm, baseline VA, hemoglobin A1c, insulin use and number of lasers and injections. RESULTS: Mean number of missed visits was 1.7. 616(94%) patients had 100% visit constancy. 331(51%) patients were on time, 171(26%) late, and 154(23%) very late in avg missed days. Max missed days ranged 0-696 days. Adjusted, each missed visit was associated with 0.3 letter decrease(95%CI: −0.6, −0.1, p=0.02); being very late in avg and max missed days saw −4.2 letters(95%CI: −6.4, −2.0, p4 days missed per attended visit saw 4.6 letters worse(95%CI:−7.3, −2.0, p

PURPOSE: To determine how kidney function identified by diagnosis codes compares to lab results-based kidney function for predicting risk of vision threatening diabetic retinopathy(VTDR). METHODS: A US medical claims database was used for this retrospective observational study. Adult patients enrolled from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2016 with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy(NPDR) were followed. Patients were excluded if they had any previous diagnosis or treatment of VTDR or VTDR diagnosed within 2 years of insurance plan entry. ICD9/10 Chronic kidney disease(CKD) diagnoses from outpatient claims were used to classify kidney disease with or without end stage renal disease(ESRD). Serum creatinine was used to calculate estimated glomerular filtration rates(eGFR). Multivariate Cox models with time-dependent covariates were used to assess the associations of kidney disease diagnosis and eGFR with progression to VTDR, controlling for demographics and time-dependent covariates(systemic health, laboratory results, insulin use). C-statistic(a measure of model discrimination), hazard ratio(HR) and their 95% confidence intervals(CI) were calculated from multivariate Cox models. RESULTS: Among 69,982 patients with NPDR, 12,770(18.2%) developed VTDR. C-statistic was identical(0.60, 95% CI: 0.59–0.60) for the multivariate model with eGFR and for the multivariate model with kidney diagnosis codes. eGFRs lower than 30mL/min/1.73m(2)(HR>1.14, p

Unstructured Abstract Intravitreal injections (IVIs) are increasing yearly by 6%. Although other countries utilize nurses and non-specialists to manage treatment burden, retina specialists still administer 93% of IVIs in the US. The clinical significance is unclear.

Defining a standard of care is difficult, and physicians don't always agree on what it means in specific contexts. This is, in part, owing to constantly changing treatment patterns; but at the same time, the underlying framework that determines standards of care is continuously evolving. This situation presents clear challenges for all practicing physicians, including ophthalmologists.Complicating the issue of defining a standard of care are the confusing origins and lexicon used to describe 3 related yet distinct ideas: standard of care, practice guidelines, and gold standards. Indeed, each of these terms is defined and influenced by many stakeholders both inside and outside the health care system. The term standard of care is one example that, although used frequently as a medical term, is often decided by courts and industry. Ophthalmology itself has provided one of the most influential cases in standard-of-care law history (Helling v Carey), which standardized the routine use of tonometry after the plaintiff lost vision because of a delayed glaucoma diagnosis. But even the courts' current view of standard of care is far different than it was at that defining moment in eye care history.Today, health care professionals typically equate standard of care with best clinical practices, and yet the law specifies a standard of minimal competence when determining standard of care. These competing definitions are, at best, misleading and, at worst, counterproductive. This narrative review examines how medical guidelines are developed, formalized, communicated, and adopted in the United States. It seeks to clarify ophthalmologists' understanding of the related but distinct ideas of standard of care, practice guidelines, and gold standards. Last, this review argues that quality of care must be distinguished from standard of care and outlines how legal definitions of standards of care can set exceedingly low benchmarks, discouraging innovation without reducing frivolous litigation.

To determine how to practice patterns for work-up of incident retinal artery occlusion (RAO) compare to the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) guidelines. In this cohort study, patients receiving a new diagnosis of RAO, either central (CRAO) or branch (BRAO), were identified between 2002 and 2020 from a large US medical claims database. Claims were reviewed for diagnostic tests specified by the AAO as essential components of an RAO work-up including carotid ultrasound, echocardiogram, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and emergency department (ED) referral. Outcomes included rates of and time to completion of work-up. 18697 new outpatient diagnoses of RAO (11348 BRAO, 7349 CRAO) were analyzed. 15.9% and 30.4% of patients received carotid ultrasounds within 7 and 30 days, respectively. 9.4% and 21.1% of patients received echocardiograms within 7 and 30 days, respectively. 4.9% and 8.1% of patients received a brain MRIs within 7 and 30 days, respectively. Only 4.1% of patients were referred to the ED within a day of diagnosis. Ophthalmologists diagnosed the majority (78.7%) of RAOs compared to neurologists (0.6%). Patients diagnosed by ophthalmologists were significantly more likely to have carotid ultrasound within 7 days, but those diagnosed by neurologists were more likely to have echocardiogram, MRI, and ED referral (p < .01 for all comparisons). The rates of adherence to the AAO care guidelines increased significantly between 2002 and 2020 (p < .01). The referral and work-up practices demonstrated in this new RAO diagnosis patient cohort have improved with time but are still far below the standard recommended by the AAO.

Background/AimsA series at a single clinical centre recently demonstrated an association between the interstitial cystitis drug pentosan polysulfate sodium (PPS) and a vision-threatening pigmentary maculopathy. The aim of this study was to determine if an association exists between PPS use and macular disease in a large national cohort.MethodsA retrospective, matched cohort study using data from a large US medical claims database from 2002 to 2016 was performed. A total of 3012 and 1604 PPS users were compared with 15 060 and 8017 matched controls at 5 and 7 years, respectively. The primary outcome measures included (1) any new diagnosis of a hereditary or secondary pigmentary maculopathy (atypical maculopathy outcome), and (2) any new diagnosis of dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) or drusen in addition to the aforementioned diagnoses (atypical maculopathy+AMD outcome).ResultsAt the 5-year and 7-year follow-up, 9 (0.3%) and 10 (0.6%) PPS patients progressed to the atypical maculopathy outcome compared with 32 (0.2%) and 25 (0.3%) control patients, respectively. 103 (3.4%) and 87 (5.4%) PPS patients developed the atypical maculopathy+AMD outcome compared with 440 (2.9%) and 328 (4.1%) control patients at 5 and 7 years, respectively. At 5 years, multivariate analysis showed no significant association (p>0.13). At 7 years, PPS users had significantly increased odds of having the atypical maculopathy+AMD outcome (OR=1.41, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.83, p=0.009).ConclusionsPPS exposure was associated with a new diagnosis of macular disease at the 7-year follow-up in a large national cohort.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine if anaemia and oxygen delivery-related co-morbidities (ODCs) affect progression from non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) to vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using medical claims data from a large US insurer. Cohorts were created from all NPDR patients between 2002 and 2016. Primary exclusion criteria consisted of any previous diagnosis of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), diabetic macular oedema (DME) or treatment used in the care of VTDR. The main outcome was a new diagnosis of VTDR (DME or PDR), PDR, or DME. A time-dependent, multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression was used to determine the association between anaemia and other ODCs with NPDR progression. RESULTS: Of the total 69,982 NPDR patients included for analysis, 12,270, 2,162, and 10,322 progressed to VTDR, PDR and DME, respectively. Both mild and moderate/severe (mod/sev) anaemia were associated with an increased hazard for progression to VTDR (mild HR:1.10, 95% CI:1.04–1.16, p 1.00, p

To determine whether sterile preloading of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents reduces the risk of postintravitreal injection endophthalmitis.This is a retrospective cohort study using medical claims data from a large, national US insurer. Cohorts were created using intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections from 2005 to 2016. For inclusion, patients had to have at least 6 months of data before the injection and were excluded for any previous diagnosis of endophthalmitis, multiple injected drugs on the day of injection, or intraocular surgery within 15 days of the injection or between an injection and a diagnosis of endophthalmitis. The primary outcome was the odds of endophthalmitis after an intravitreal injection.A total of 706,725 bevacizumab, 210,849 ranibizumab, and 177,731 aflibercept injections were given to 130,327 patients. Multivariate analysis showed that ranibizumab and aflibercept together had an increased odds of endophthalmitis (odds ratio = 1.29, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.59, P = 0.02) compared with bevacizumab. Individually, ranibizumab (odds ratio = 1.25, 95% confidence interval: 0.97-1.61, P = 0.08) and aflibercept (odds ratio = 1.34, 95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.81, P = 0.06) each had higher odds of endophthalmitis, but neither result met significance. Also, when compared with male patients, female patients had a higher odds of getting endophthalmitis (odds ratio: 1.30, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.61, P = 0.02).The odds of endophthalmitis with aflibercept and ranibizumab combined were higher compared with the sterilely preloaded bevacizumab, arguing for a safety advantage of sterile preloading of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections.

Purpose: To determine whether anemia and other demographic or laboratory “risk factors” impact anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment in diabetic macular edema patients. Methods: This is a retrospective, time-varying cohort study using a medical claims database to identify new diabetic macular edema patients who had received at least one intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor. Exclusion occurred for having Results: In total, 189 new diabetic macular edema patients with follow-up were analyzed, covering 729 visits with 543 (74.5%) receiving treatment. Univariate analysis showed that male gender (odds ratio: 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.32–0.91, p = 0.03), every week since last injection (odds ratio: 0.94, 95% confidence interval: 0.91–0.97, p = 0.001), and having two eyes affected (odds ratio: 2.09, 95% confidence interval: 1.10–3.97, p = 0.02) were associated with getting an injection. After multivariate analysis, only time since previous injection with every week that passed reduced the odds on having an injection at the next visit (odds ratio: 0.95, 95% confidence interval: 0.92–0.97, p Conclusion: This study used time-varying methodology to better identify which patients will likely need an injection at any one visit. While anemia was not found to impact injections, our results can aid future endeavors that may incorporate clinical visit information in developing a full prediction model to help make diabetic macular edema care more efficient.

The purpose of this study is to determine if statin therapy decreases the incidence of non-infectious uveitis (NIU) using a retrospective cohort study. Patients enrolled in a national insurance plan who initiated statin (n = 711,734, statin cohort) or other lipid-lowering therapy (n = 148,044, non-statin cohort) were observed for NIU development. Incident NIU in the primary analysis was defined as a new diagnosis code for NIU followed by a second instance of a NIU code within 120 days. For the secondary outcome definition, a corticosteroid prescription or code for an ocular corticosteroid injection within 120 days of the NIU diagnosis code was used instead of the second NIU diagnosis code. Estimation of NIU incidence used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. The proportional hazards assumption was satisfied by creating two time periods of analysis, ≤ 150 and > 150 days. Subanalyses were performed by anatomic subtype. Overall, the primary outcome occurred 541 times over 690,465 person-years in the statin cohort and 103 times over 104,301 person-years in the non-statin cohort. No associations were seen in the ≤ 150-day analyses (p > 0.20 for all comparisons). However, after 150 days, the statin cohort was less likely to develop any uveitis [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51–0.97, P = 0.03] in the primary outcome analysis, but did not meet significance for the secondary outcome (HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.63–1.15, P = 0.30). Similarly, in the anatomic subtype analysis, after 150 days, the statin cohort was less likely to develop anterior uveitis (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47–0.97, P = 0.03) in the primary analysis, but the association did not reach significance for the secondary outcome (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.56–1.20, P = 0.31). Our results suggest that statin therapy for > 150 days decreases the incidence of NIU.

Background/aimsGlucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists regulate blood glucose and are commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus. Recent work showed that treatment with the GLP-1R agonist NLY01 decreased retinal neuroinflammation and glial activation to rescue retinal ganglion cells in a mouse model of glaucoma. In this study, we used an insurance claims database (Clinformatics Data Mart) to examine whether GLP-1R agonist exposure impacts glaucoma risk.MethodsA retrospective cohort of patients who initiated a new GLP-1R agonist was 1:3 age, gender, race, classes of active diabetes medications and year of index date matched to patients who initiated a different class of oral diabetic medication. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used within a multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model to test the association between GLP-1R agonist exposure and a new diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma, glaucoma suspect or low-tension glaucoma.ResultsCohorts were comprised of 1961 new users of GLP-1R agonists matched to 4371 unexposed controls. After IPTW, all variables were balanced (standard mean deviation ConclusionsGLP-1R agonist use was associated with a statistically significant hazard reduction for a new diagnosis of glaucoma. Our findings support further investigations into the use of GLP-1R agonists in glaucoma prevention.

Purpose: To assess whether metformin is associated with dry age-related macular degeneration (dAMD) development. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients enrolled in a nationwide U.S. medical insurance claims database from 2002 to 2016 were included if they had diabetes mellitus, were ⩾55 years old, and were enrolled for ⩾2 years without a prior AMD diagnosis. The primary exposure was metformin use analyzed as either active or prior use or cumulative metformin dosage over the study period. A time updating Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio of dAMD incidence with metformin exposure. Results: Among 1,007,226 diabetic enrollees, 53.3% were female and 66.4% were white with a mean hemoglobin A1c of 6.8%. Of eligible enrollees, 166,115 (16.5%) were taking metformin at the index date. Over the study period, 29,818 (3.0%) participants developed dAMD. In the active versus prior use of metformin model, active use conferred an increased hazard of developing dAMD (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04–1.12) while prior use had a decreased hazard (HR, 0.95; 95% CI 0.92–0.98). The cumulative metformin dosage model showed a significant trend toward increased hazard of dAMD incidence with increasing cumulative dosage ( p Conclusions: Small, conflicting associations between metformin exposure and development of dAMD were observed depending on cumulative dosage and whether drug use was active, suggesting metformin did not substantially affect the development of dAMD.

IMPORTANCE: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) may progress from nonproliferative DR (NPDR) to vision-threatening DR (VTDR). Studies have investigated fenofibrate use as a protective measure with conflicting results, and fenofibrate is not typically considered by ophthalmologists in the management of DR currently. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between fenofibrate use and the progression from NPDR to VTDR, proliferative DR (PDR), or diabetic macular edema (DME). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter cohort study used medical claims data from a large US insurer. Cohorts were created from all patients with NPDR 18 years or older who had laboratory values from January 1, 2002, to June 30, 2019. Exclusion criteria consisted of any previous diagnosis of PDR, DME, proliferative vitreoretinopathy, or treatment used in the care of VTDR. Patients were also excluded if they had a diagnosis of VTDR within 2 years of insurance plan entry, regardless of when NPDR was first noted in the plan. EXPOSURES: Fenofibrate use. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcomes were a new diagnosis of VTDR (a composite outcome of either PDR or DME) or DME and PDR individually. A time-updating model for all covariates was used in multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression to determine hazards of progressing to an outcome. Additional covariates included NPDR severity scale, systemic illnesses, demographics, kidney function (based on estimated glomerular filtration rate level), hemoglobin A(1c), hemoglobin, and insulin use. RESULTS: A total of 5835 fenofibrate users with NPDR at baseline (mean [SD] age, 65.3 [10.4] years; 3564 [61.1%] male; 3024 [51.8%] White) and 144 417 fenofibrate nonusers (mean [SD] age, 65.7 [12.3] years; 73 587 [51.0%] male; 67 023 [46.4%] White) were included for analysis. Of these, 27 325 (18.2%) progressed to VTDR, 4086 (2.71%) progressed to PDR, and 22 750 (15.1%) progressed to DME. After controlling for all covariates, Cox model results showed fenofibrates to be associated with a decreased risk of VTDR (hazard ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.87-0.98]; P = .01) and PDR (hazard ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.64-0.90]; P = .001) but not DME (hazard ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.90-1.03]; P = .27). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, fenofibrate use was associated with a decreased risk of PDR and VTDR but not DME alone. These findings support the rationale for additional clinical trials to determine if these associations may be representative of a causal relationship between fenofibrate use and reduced risk of PDR or VTDR.

ImportanceGlucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists regulate blood glucose and are commonly used to treat Type II Diabetes Mellitus. Recent work has shown that treatment with the novel GLP-1R agonist, NLY01, decreased retinal neuroinflammation and glial activation to rescue retinal ganglion cells in an animal model of glaucoma.ObjectiveIn this study, we used an insurance claims database to examine whether GLP-1R agonist exposure impacts glaucoma risk.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA retrospective cohort of adult patients who initiated a new GLP-1R agonist (i.e., exenatide, liraglutide, albiglutide, dulaglutide, semaglutide, or lixisenatide) was 1:3 age, gender, race, active diabetes medication classes, and year of index date matched to a cohort of patients who initiated a different class of oral diabetic medication during their time in the database. Exclusion occurred for ExposureGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist.Main Outcomes and MeasuresNew diagnosis of primary open angle glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, or low tension glaucoma.ResultsCohorts were comprised of 1,961 new users of GLP-1R agonists matched to 4,371 unexposed controls. After IPTW, age was the only covariate imbalanced (SMD >0.1) between cohorts. Ten new diagnoses of glaucoma (0.51%) were present in the GLP-1R agonist cohort compared to 58 (1.33%) in the unexposed controls. After adjustment, GLP-1R exposure conferred a reduced hazard of 0.54 (95%CI: 0.35-0.85, P =0.007), suggesting that GLP-1R agonists reduce the risk for glaucoma.Conclusions and RelevanceGLP-1R agonist use was associated with a statistically significant hazard reduction for a new glaucoma diagnosis. Our findings support further investigations into the use of GLP-1R agonists in glaucoma prevention.

To determine if angiotensin converting enzyme-inhibitors (ACE-I) alter the incidence of non-infectious uveitis (NIU). Patients in a large healthcare claims database who initiated ACE-I (n = 695,557) were compared to patients who initiated angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB, n = 354,295). A second comparison was also made between patients who initiated ACE-I (n = 505,958) and those who initiated beta-blockers (BB, n = 538,109). The primary outcome was incident NIU defined as a first diagnosis code for NIU followed by a second instance of a NIU code within 120 days. For the secondary outcome, a corticosteroid prescription or code for an ocular corticosteroid injection within 120 days of the NIU diagnosis code was used instead of the second NIU diagnosis code. Data were analyzed using Cox regression modeling with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Sub-analyses were performed by anatomic subtype. When comparing ACE-I to ARB initiators, the hazard ratio (HR) for incident NIU was not significantly different for the primary outcome [HR = 0.95, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.85���1.07, P = .41] or secondary outcome [HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.86���1.07, P = .44]. Similarly, in the ACE-I and BB initiators comparison, the HR for incident NIU was not significantly different comparing ACE-I and BB initiators for either outcome definition or any of the NIU anatomical subtypes. Our results suggest there is no evidence that ACE-I have a protective effect on NIU.

PURPOSE: To determine associations of systemic medications with the incidence and growth of geographic atrophy (GA) in participants of the comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatments trials. METHODS: Participants of comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatments trials with new untreated choroidal neovascularization in the study eye (one study eye per participant) were randomized to receive treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab. Participants were released from clinical trial treatment at 2 years and examined at approximately 5 years. Color fundus photographs and fluorescein angiograms taken at baseline, Years 1, 2, and 5 were assessed for the presence and size of GA by two masked graders. Participants were interviewed about systemic medication use at baseline. Systemic medications previously reported to be associated with age-related macular degeneration were evaluated for associations with GA incidence in study eye using univariable and multivariable Cox models and for association with the GA growth using linear mixed effects models. RESULTS: In multivariable analysis of 1,011 study eyes without baseline GA, systemic medications, including cholinesterase inhibitors, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, diuretics, aspirin, steroids, statins, hormone replacement therapy, antacids, and drugs targeting G protein-coupled receptors, were not associated with GA incidence in the study eye (all adjusted hazard ratios ≤1.86, P ≥ 0.18). In multivariable analysis of 214 study eyes with longitudinal GA size measurements, calcium channel blockers were associated with a higher GA growth rate (0.40 vs. 0.30 mm/year, P =0.02). CONCLUSION: None of the systemic medications analyzed were associated with GA incidence. However, calcium channel blockers were associated with a higher growth rate of GA in the study eye.

Importance Oral contraceptives have been associated with cardiovascular disease, ischemic stroke, venous thromboembolic disease, and breast cancer. Retinal vascular occlusions share the same risk factors as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. Objective To determine whether filling a prescription of female hormone therapy (FHT) is associated with an increased risk of retinal artery occlusion (RAO) or retinal vein occlusions (RVO). Design, Setting, and Participants A multiple-cohort study was conducted using an administrative claims insurance database comparing women who filled a prescription for FHT with matched control individuals. Exclusion occurred for those enrolled for less than 2 years in the plan, with no prior ophthalmologic examination, with a history of a RAO/RVO, with systemic diseases/medications that affected estrogen levels, or a disease associated with an increased risk for thromboembolism. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the incidence of a new diagnosis of RAO or RVO. Cox proportional hazard regression modeling with inverse probability of treatment weight was used to assess the hazard ratio (HR) for a new diagnosis of RAO or RVO relative to filling prescription for FHT. Subanalyses were conducted to stratify by age, race/ethnicity, diabetes, and hypertension. Results A total of 205 304 women who filled a prescription for FHT were matched to 755 462 control individuals. After inverse probability of treatment weight, the study cohort was a mean age of 47.2 years, 71% were White, 7% were Black, 6% were Hispanic, 3% were Asian, and 3% were unknown. There were 41 cases (0.01%) of RAO and 68 cases of RVO (0.02%) in the FHT cohort. In comparison, there were 373 cases of RAO (0.05%) and 617 cases of RVO (0.08%) in the control cohort. After inverse probability of treatment weight, Cox regression analysis showed no difference in hazard for RAO, RVO, or combined outcomes in the FHT cohort relative to the control cohort (RAO HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.83-1.65;P = .36; RVO HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.82-1.39;P = .65; combined HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.89-1.36;P = .37). Subanalyses that stratified by age, diabetes, and hypertension similarly showed no significant associations between the FHT prescription cohort and all outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that filling a prescription for FHT, and presumably taking FHT, does not increase the risk of RAO or RVO. Such history may not be relevant in the evaluation of an individual with an RAO or RVO nor do our results support stopping FHT in an individual who develops an RAO or RVO.

Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is increasingly performed at the time of cataract extraction. Understanding the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients undergoing MIGS procedures may provide insight into patient selection. This study evaluates racial-ethnic and other differences in the use of MIGS in persons with cataract and open-angle glaucoma (OAG).Retrospective cohort study using Intelligent Research in Sight (IRIS) Registry data.Patients aged ≥ 40 years with a diagnosis of OAG and no history of MIGS or cataract surgery who were undergoing cataract extraction, with or without MIGS, during 2013 to 2017 in the United States.Multivariable logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Variables assessed include age, sex, race-ethnicity, disease severity, insurance type, census region, comorbidity, and cup-to-disc ratio (CDR).The odds of MIGS use was greater among patients who were aged ≥ 60 years (OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.05-1.16]); Black (OR, 1.11 [CI, 1.07-1.15]) compared with White; a Medicare recipient (OR, 1.12 [CI, 1.10-1.15]) versus privately insured; or in the Midwest (OR, 1.32 [CI, 1.28-1.36]) or Northeast (OR, 1.26 [CI, 1.22-1.30]) compared with the South. Having moderate rather than mild glaucoma (OR, 1.07 [CI, 1.04-1.11]) and a higher CDR (OR for 0.5 to 0.8 vs.0.5, 1.24 [CI, 1.21-1.26]; OR for0.8 to 1.0 vs.0.5, 1.27 [CI, 1.23-1.32]) were also each associated with increased odds of MIGS use. Use of MIGS was less likely in women (OR, 0.96 [CI, 0.94-0.98]); patients taking 5 to 7 glaucoma medications (OR, 0.94 [CI, 0.90-0.99]) compared with 1 to 2 medications; and patients with severe, compared with mild, glaucoma (OR, 0.64 [CI, 0.61-0.67]).This analysis highlights the importance of capturing race-ethnicity data and other pertinent patient characteristics in electronic health records to provide insight into practice patterns. Such data can be used to assess the long-term performance of MIGS and other procedures in various patient populations.

Importance Visit adherence has been shown to play a significant role in patient health outcomes. The effect of missing visits on visual acuity (VA) in individuals with neovascular age-related macular degeneration has yet to be characterized. Objective To quantify the association between patients’ adherence to randomized clinical trial visits and VA in individuals with neovascular age-related macular degeneration based on 4 visit adherence metrics. Design, Setting, and Participants This is a secondary analysis of the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatment Trial randomized clinical trial. Individuals with age-related macular degeneration were recruited from 44 clinical centers in the United States between February 2008 and December 2009. The 2-year study protocol required 1 visit every 4 weeks (every 21-35 days for a total of 26 visits) for monthly vs pro re nata treatments of bevacizumab vs ranibizumab. Analysis took place from November 2018 through May 2019. Exposures Visit adherence was measured in 4 ways: total number of missed visits, average number of days (avg days) between each visit, longest duration in days (max days) between visits, and visit constancy (the tally of 3-month periods with at least 1 visit attended). Average and max days were also categorized as on time (28-35 days), late (36-60 days), and very late (>60 days). Main Outcomes and Measures Change in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study VA between the baseline and the last visit. Linear multivariate regression models were applied to analyze the association between visit adherence and change in VA, controlling for age, sex, baseline VA, anti–vascular endothelial growth factor drug, number of injections, and dosing regimen. Results Of 1178 patients, the mean (SD) age was 79.1 (7.3) years, and 727 (61.7%) were women. The mean (SD) number of missed visits was 2.4 (3.1). Overall, 1091 patients (92.6%) had complete visit constancy during the entire study period. Average days were categorized with 1060 patients (90.0%) classified as on time, 108 (9.2%) were late, and 10 (0.8%) were very late. For max days between visits, 197 patients (16.7%) were on time, 773 (65.6%) were late, and 208 (17.7%) were very late. After controlling for covariates, the late (avg days = −6.1; max days = −2.0) and very late (avg days = −12.5; max days = −5.9) groups saw fewer letters in both the avg and max days categories than patients in the on-time group (P Conclusions and Relevance These results provide evidence to support the concept that visit adherence contributes to VA outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. The magnitude of the association of visit adherence with VA outcomes in this clinical scenario suggests that substantial effort should be expended to strive for visit adherence or therapeutic strategies that reduce the visit burden without compromising VA outcomes. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT00593450

To determine whether testosterone supplementation is associated with retinal artery occlusion (RAO) or retinal vein occlusion (RVO).Retrospective matched cohort study using data from a large national U.S. insurance database. The testosterone cohort consisted of all male patients who filled a prescription for testosterone from 2000 to 2013. Five controls were matched on age (±3 years), sex, race, and similar time in plan (±3 months) for every exposed patient. Exclusion occurred for2 years in the plan,1 eye care visit, medications known to affect androgen levels, and systemic diseases associated with occlusions or increased testosterone. Cox proportional hazard regression assessed the hazard of a new diagnosis of RAO or RVO while controlling for age, race, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension.A total of 35,784 incident testosterone users were compared with 178,860 matched controls. Ninety-three (0.3%) RAOs and 50 (0.1%) RVOs were found in the testosterone cohort and contrasted with 316 (0.2%) RAOs and 232 (0.1%) RVOs in the control group. After multivariate analysis, testosterone supplementation significantly increased the hazard of RAO (hazard ratio: 1.43, 95% confidence interval: 1.12-1.81, P = 0.004), but not of RVO (hazard ratio: 1.03, 95% confidence interval: 0.74-1.42, P = 0.86).Although the incidence of RAO and RVO is low in users of testosterone, supplementation therapy is associated with an increased hazard of RAO, but apparently not of RVO.

PURPOSE: Assess systemic vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF) levels after treatment with intravitreous aflibercept, bevacizumab or ranibizumab. DESIGN: Comparative-effectiveness trial with participants randomly assigned to 2-mg aflibercept, 1.25-mg bevacizumab, or 0.3-mg ranibizumab following a retreatment algorithm. PARTICIPANTS: Participants with available plasma samples (N=436) METHODS: Plasma samples were collected before injections at baseline, 4-week, 52-week and 104-week visits. In a pre-planned secondary analysis, systemic free-VEGF levels from an ELISA immunoassay were compared across anti-VEGF agents and correlated with systemic side effects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in the natural log (ln) of plasma VEGF levels. RESULTS: Baseline free-VEGF levels were similar across all 3 groups. At 4 weeks, mean ln(VEGF) changes were −0.30±0.61, −0.31±0.54, −0.02±0.44 pg/ml for the aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab groups, respectively. The adjusted differences between treatment groups (adjusted CI; P-value) were −0.01 (−0.12, +0.10; P=0.89), −0.31 (−0.44, −0.18; P

Diabetic retinopathy diagnostic assessment and treatment options have improved dramatically since the 2002 American Diabetes Association Position Statement (1). These improvements include the widespread adoption of optical coherence tomography to assess retinal thickness and intraretinal pathology and wide-field fundus photography to reveal clinically silent microvascular lesions. Treatment of diabetic macular edema is now achieved by intravitreous injection of anti–vascular endothelial growth factor agents, and the same drugs are now used for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Improvements in medications and devices for the systemic therapy of diabetes have also improved the ability of patients to optimize their metabolic control. This Position Statement incorporates these recent developments for the use of physicians and patients. Diabetic retinopathy is a highly specific neurovascular complication of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, the prevalence of which strongly correlates to both the duration of diabetes and level of glycemic control. A pooled meta-analysis involving 35 studies conducted worldwide from 1980 to 2008 estimated global prevalence of any diabetic retinopathy and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) among patients to be 35.4% and 7.5%, respectively (2). Diabetic retinopathy is the most frequent cause of new cases of blindness among adults aged 20–74 years in developed countries. Glaucoma, cataracts, and other disorders of the eye occur earlier and more frequently in people with diabetes. In addition to diabetes duration, factors that increase the risk of or are associated with retinopathy include chronic hyperglycemia (3,4), nephropathy (5), hypertension (6), and dyslipidemia (7). Intensive diabetes management with the goal of achieving near-normoglycemia has been shown in large prospective randomized studies to prevent and/or delay the onset and progression of diabetic retinopathy (8,9). Lowering blood pressure has been shown to decrease retinopathy progression in people with type 2 diabetes, although tight targets (systolic blood pressure

IMPORTANCE: Opioid abuse has been declared a public health emergency. Currently, little is known about the association between opioids and ocular surgery. OBJECTIVE: To characterize rates of filled opioid prescriptions after incisional ocular surgeries. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study included patients with incisional ocular surgeries within a large national US insurer’s administrative medical claims database. All incisional ocular surgeries from January 2000 through December 2016 were evaluated. An opioid prescription was eligible if it occurred from 1 day before to 7 days after a surgery. Any surgery on a patient who was younger than 18 years, had more than 30 consecutive days of an opioid prescription in the prior 6 months, or had less than 6 months of data in the database prior to surgery was excluded. Data analysis occurred from May 2018 through November 2018. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The rate of opioid prescriptions filled for all incisional ocular surgeries from 2000 through 2016. Primary analysis looked at the rate of filled opioid prescriptions for each ophthalmic subspecialty surgery over time. Secondary analysis assessed which patient or surgical characteristics (ie, age, sex, race/ethnicity, geographic locations, yearly income, educational level, and type of eye surgery) were associated with filling an opioid prescription. Multivariate logistic regression using generalized estimating equations was used to determine odds ratios (ORs) of filling an opioid prescription. RESULTS: A total of 2 407 962 incisional ocular surgeries were included, of which 45 776 (1.90%) were associated with an opioid prescription. The rate of filled opioid prescriptions varied considerably over time, with the lowest rate occurring in the 2000-2001 cohort year (671 of 45 776 [1.24%]) and the highest in 2014 (5559 of 45 776 [2.51%]). An increasing trend was seen over the course of the study (2000-2001: 671 of 45 776 [1.24%]; 2016: 5851 of 45 776 [2.07%]; P

PURPOSE: The Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial(ONTT) showed that an MRI of the brain is a powerful predictor of developing multiple sclerosis(MS). However, surveys of practitioners suggest that the recommended use of imaging is not consistently followed in practice. With this study we aim to assess the rate at which newly diagnosed optic neuritis(ON) patients receive brain MRIs. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using administrative medical claims data from a large, national US insurer. All incident cases from 2000-2016 of ON in patients without MS were assessed. The primary outcome was a comparison of patterns of MRI scanning usage following diagnosis of ON. Secondary outcomes evaluated steroid treatment and progression to MS. RESULTS: Of 2,865 qualified ON patients, 1,755(61.3%) received a brain MRI. At 1 year follow up, 629 patients(30.3%) of patients had progressed to MS, a rate that increased slightly to 34.3%(366 patients) within a 3-yr period of their initial ON diagnosis. 520(18.2%) patients received IV steroids, and 383(13.4%) received oral steroids within 30 days of the ON diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Across the U.S., a surprisingly low number of individuals obtain a brain MRI following onset of ON, suggesting physicians may not be fully assessing the risk of MS.