Prescription opioid misuse is an emerging public health concern with significant health and psychological risks. Though opioid analgesic therapy for chronic pain is often efficacious, and most patients take medicine as prescribed, some individuals exhibit addictive tendencies toward opioids (Fishbain, Cole, Lewis, Rosomoff, & Rosomoff, 2007). Opioid addiction among chronic pain patients involves cognitive, affective, and behavioral dysregulation that, when coupled with persistent or worsening pain, may result in significant functional impairment and suffering (Hojsted, Nielsen, Guldstrand, Frich, & Sjogren, 2010). Opioid addiction may be presaged by the occurrence of opioid misuse behaviors, such as dose escalation or use of prescribed opioids to self-medicate negative emotions and stress (Butler et al., 2007); these medication-misusing behaviors are common, with more than one-in-ten chronic pain patients exhibiting signs of opioid misuse (Fishbain et al., 2007). Although opioid agents with lower addiction liability like buprenorphine can effectively substitute for unauthorized opioid use (Ling et al., 2002), extant treatments for opioid addiction are typically ineffective in the absence of ongoing maintenance pharmacotherapy (Weiss et al., 2011). Further, persons seeking treatment for chronic pain respond especially poorly to motivational and behavioral addiction treatments (Larson et al., 2007). Current best practices for persons with chronic pain who are at risk for prescription opioid misuse and addiction (e.g., Jamison, Serraillier, & Michner, 2011; Oliver et al., 2012) include frequent opioid adherence monitoring, opioid treatment agreements and compliance training, and cognitive-behavioral substance misuse counseling (Jamison et al., 2010). Yet, new interventions are needed to effectively address the maladaptive cognitive-affective processes and appetitive responses elicited by pain, stress, and drug-related cues that undergird the risk chain from chronic pain to opioid misuse and addiction. This risk chain initiates from prolonged use of opioids, which produces physical dependence via neuroadaptations resulting in tolerance, withdrawal, and, in some cases, opioid-induced hyperalgesia (Chu, Angst, & Clark, 2008). Heightened pain sensitivity, when coupled with tolerance to the analgesic effects of opioids, can result in increased opioid craving (Ren, Shi, Epstein, Wang, & Lu, 2009) and consumption (Martell et al., 2007), and can elicit negative emotions that feed back to magnify pain perception. This process may result in appraisal of pain sensations as threatening and perseveration on the affective components of pain (Garland, 2012). Consequently, opioids are often misused to self-medicate (Khantzian, 1997; Kirsh, Jass, Bennett, Hagen, & Passik, 2007) the negative affective states and autonomic arousal that cause, co-occur with, or result from pain (Janig, 1995; Martenson, Cetas, & Heinricher, 2009). As with pain, stress and negative affect can become internal cues associated with past opioid use episodes that elicit the habit of opioid use, particularly among opioid misusers who take opioids to cope with emotional distress. Concomitantly, the habitual drive to engage in prescription opioid misuse (including unauthorized dose escalation) involves implicit neurocognitive operations that promote craving and aberrant drug taking (Goldstein et al., 2009; Stacy & Wiers, 2010) by biasing attention towards opioid-related cues (e.g., the sight of a pill bottle) (Garland, Froeliger, Passik, & Howard, 2012). Theory suggests that addiction occurs when the appetitive motivation to obtain natural rewards is re-organized around seeking drug-induced reward and the desire to alleviate dysphoria stemming from withdrawal and aversive experiences (e.g., pain and stress) (Alcaro & Panksepp, 2011; Koob & Le Moal, 2008). In that regard, decreased responsiveness to natural reinforcers has been observed among opiate dependent individuals and is robustly predictive of future opiate consumption (Lubman et al., 2009; Lubman, Allen, Peters, & Deakin, 2007, 2008). Hence, the problem of co-occurring chronic pain and prescription opioid misuse may involve a cycle of behavioral escalation where nociception and stress amplify pain and provoke recurrent self-medication with opioids, which in turn biases attention towards opioid-related cues that come to elicit the habit of opioid use despite ever diminishing analgesia and increasing dysphoria (Garland, Froeliger, Zeidan, Partin, & Howard, 2013). Despite such risks, opioids remain medically necessary for many individuals experiencing prolonged and intractable pain. Thus, therapeutic interventions are needed to target comorbid pain and opioid misuse. Though cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) has been shown to produce therapeutic reductions in pain (Williams, Eccleston, & Morley, 2012) and opioid misuse (Jamison et al., 2010) in isolation, there is scant research on psychological treatments that simultaneously address symptoms of co-occurring chronic pain and opioid misuse. To that end, we conducted an early-stage randomized controlled trial of Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE) (Garland, 2013), a novel multimodal intervention that integrates mindfulness training, cognitive reappraisal skills, and positive emotion regulation into a therapeutic approach designed to modify attentional biases, habit behavior, affective dysregulation, and autonomic stress responses underlying the feedback loop between chronic pain, craving, and opioid misuse behaviors. Each of these three intervention components has been shown to be beneficial in isolation. Mindfulness training leads to reductions in pain (Gaylord et al., 2011; Kabat-Zinn et al., 1992; Rosenzweig et al., 2010; Zeidan et al., 2011) that are mediated by increased nonreactivity to aversive mental experiences and reinterpretation of affectively-laden pain sensations as innocuous sensory signals (Garland, Gaylord, Palsson, Faurot, Mann, & Whitehead, 2012). Moreover, mindfulness training produces salutary effects on emotional distress (Grossman, Niemann, Schmidt, & Walach, 2004; Hofmann, Sawyer, Witt, & Oh, 2010) and addiction-related factors (Bowen et al., 2009; Garland, Froeliger, & Howard, 2013), including attentional bias and autonomic cue-reactivity (Garland, Gaylord, Boettiger, & Howard, 2010). Similarly, cognitive reappraisal has been shown to significantly decrease negative emotions and downregulate stress physiology (Ochsner & Gross, 2005), as well as reduce substance craving (Kober et al., 2011). In complementary fashion, positive emotion regulatory strategies (e.g., savoring pleasant events) may upregulate positive affect, reduce anhedonia, and promote psychological resilience (Garland, Fredrickson, Kring, Johnson, Meyer, & Penn, 2010). MORE, which was originally tested as a treatment for alcohol dependence (Garland, Gaylord et al., 2010), capitalizes on the synergy of these three treatment components by integrating them into a multimodal intervention. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of developing a clinical trial comparing acute (pre-post) and longer-term (3-month follow-up) efficacy of MORE with that of a conventional support group (SG) in reducing chronic pain and prescription opioid misuse. The study employed an active control condition which attempted to control for non-specific therapeutic factors such as social interaction and support. We hypothesized that participation in MORE would be associated with significantly greater reductions in pain severity, pain interference, stress symptoms, and desire for opioids than would participation in a SG. We also hypothesized that compared to SG participants, a significantly greater proportion of individuals completing MORE who met clinical criteria for prescription opioid use disorder before treatment would no longer meet opioid use disorder criteria following treatment. Insofar as clinicians in the field must often make dichotomous diagnostic judgments in practice and may need to ascertain the extent to which a disorder can be rendered subclinical following treatment (cf., Eftekhari et al., 2013), we were interested in whether MORE could reduce symptoms below the clinical threshold for opioid use disorder. Lastly, although MORE was designed to target a wide array of cognitive, affective, and autonomic mechanisms as detailed above, in the present study we tested the effects of the intervention on a focused set of mediators selected for their direct relevance to primary study outcomes. Because emotional reactivity and maladaptive appraisals of pain and stress undergird the risk chain linking chronic pain and opioid misuse, we hypothesized that the therapeutic effects of MORE on pain severity and opioid use disorder status would be associated with increased nonreactivity, cognitive reappraisal, and reinterpretation of pain sensations as innocuous sensory information.