Search

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a medication that prevents HIV acquisition, yet PrEP uptake has been low among people who inject drugs. Stigma has been identified as a fundamental driver of population health and may be a significant barrier to PrEP care engagement among PWID. However, there has been limited research on how stigma operates in rural and urban settings in relation to PrEP. Using in-depth semi-structured qualitative interviews (n = 57) we explore PrEP continuum engagement among people actively injecting drugs in rural and urban settings. Urban participants had more awareness and knowledge. Willingness to use PrEP was similar in both settings. However, no participant was currently using PrEP. Stigmas against drug use, HIV, and sexualities were identified as barriers to PrEP uptake, particularly in the rural setting. Syringe service programs in the urban setting were highlighted as a welcoming space where PWID could socialize and therefore mitigate stigma and foster information sharing. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10461-021-03488-2.

Overdoses continue to increase in the US, but the contribution of methamphetamine use is understudied in rural communities.To estimate the prevalence of methamphetamine use and its correlates among people who use drugs (PWUD) in rural US communities and to determine whether methamphetamine use is associated with increased nonfatal overdoses.From January 2018 through March 2020, the National Rural Opioid Initiative conducted cross-sectional surveys of PWUD in rural communities in 10 states (Illinois, Kentucky, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin). Participants included rural PWUD who reported any past-30-day injection drug use or noninjection opioid use to get high. A modified chain-referral sampling strategy identified seeds who referred others using drugs. Data analysis was performed from May 2021 to January 2022.Use of methamphetamine alone, opioids alone, or both.Unweighted and weighted prevalence of methamphetamine use, any past-180-day nonfatal overdose, and number of lifetime nonfatal overdoses.Among the 3048 participants, 1737 (57%) were male, 2576 (85%) were White, and 225 (7.4%) were American Indian; the mean (SD) age was 36 (10) years. Most participants (1878 of 2970 participants with any opioid or methamphetamine use [63%]) reported co-use of methamphetamine and opioids, followed by opioids alone (702 participants [24%]), and methamphetamine alone (390 participants [13%]). The estimated unweighted prevalence of methamphetamine use was 80% (95% CI, 64%-90%), and the estimated weighted prevalence was 79% (95% CI, 57%-91%). Nonfatal overdose was greatest in people using both methamphetamine and opioids (395 of 2854 participants with nonmissing overdose data [22%]) vs opioids alone (99 participants [14%]) or methamphetamine alone (23 participants [6%]). Co-use of methamphetamine and opioids was associated with greater nonfatal overdose compared with opioid use alone (adjusted odds ratio, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.08-1.94; P = .01) and methamphetamine use alone (adjusted odds ratio, 3.26; 95% CI, 2.06-5.14; P .001). Those with co-use had a mean (SD) of 2.4 (4.2) (median [IQR], 1 [0-3]) lifetime overdoses compared with 1.7 (3.5) (median [IQR], 0 [0-2]) among those using opioids alone (adjusted rate ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.01-1.43; P = .04), and 1.1 (2.9) (median [IQR], 0 [0-1]) among those using methamphetamine alone (adjusted rate ratio, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.45-2.27; P .001). Participants with co-use most often reported having tried and failed to access substance use treatment: 827 participants (44%) for both, 117 participants (30%) for methamphetamine alone, and 252 participants (36%) for opioids alone (χ22 = 33.8; P .001). Only 66 participants (17%) using methamphetamine alone had naloxone.These findings suggest that harm reduction and substance use disorder treatment interventions must address both methamphetamine and opioids to decrease overdose in rural communities.

Rural cancer disparities are associated with lesser healthcare access and screening adherence. The opioid epidemic may increase disparities as people who use drugs (PWUD) frequently experience healthcare-associated stigmatizing experiences which discourage seeking routine care. Rural PWUD were recruited to complete surveys and interviews exploring cancer (cervical, breast, colorectal, lung) risk, screening history, and healthcare experiences. From July 2020–July 2021 we collected 37 surveys and 8 interviews. Participants were 24.3% male, 86.5% White race, and had a mean age of 44.8 years. Females were less likely to report seeing a primary care provider on a regular basis, and more likely to report stigmatizing healthcare experiences. A majority of females reporting receiving recommendations and screens for cervical and breast cancer, but only a minority were adherent. Similarly, only a minority of males and females reported receiving screening tests for colorectal and lung cancer. Screening rates for all cancers were substantially below those for the US generally and rural areas specifically. Interviews confirmed stigmatizing healthcare experiences and suggested screening barriers and possible solutions. The opioid epidemic involves millions of individuals and is disproportionately experienced in rural communities. To avoid exacerbating existing rural cancer disparities, methods to engage PWUD in cancer screening need to be developed.

Background Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection rates have increased among younger, rural persons nationally. We report on a preliminary sample of a study examining HCV acquisition risk factors among rural persons who inject drugs (PWID) or person who use opioids (PWUO) non-medically. Methods We used respondent-driven sampling (RDS) to recruit PWID/PWUO in southern, rural Illinois as part of a larger study on infectious disease rates among social networks of PWID and illicit opioid users. Participants were surveyed regarding drug and sexual risk behavior, healthcare access, stigma, and social networks, and underwent rapid screening for HCV (OraQuickÒ HCV Rapid Antibody Test) and other infections. Using R software, we generated descriptive statistics to characterize HCV prevalence. Results Between July 2018 and April 2019,135 current PWID/PWUO were recruited, screened, and surveyed (58.5% male; 82.2% white; mean age 40.1 years). HCV rapid tests detected antibodies (HCV+) among 53 of 112 screened (47.3%). HCV+ participants were more likely to be white (96.2% vs. 83.1%, P = 0.006) than HCV antibody negative (HCV-) participants and showed a bimodal age distribution with peaks in the 25–30 and 45–50 age ranges. Reported injection drug use and heroin use in the past 30 days was significantly more common among HCV+ participants (96.2% vs. 72.9%, P = 0.001, and 12.9 vs. 7.9 days, P = 0.024) While HCV+ participants less frequently used methamphetamine compared with HCV -participants, the use of that drug was still high in both groups (11.9 vs. 18.4 days of use in the past 30 days, P = 0.01). HCV+ participants reported fewer social network members than HCV- participants (2.2 vs. 3.0, P = 0.048). Conclusion In this analysis of a preliminary sample, HCV exposure was high; with those positive for HCV antibody showing a bimodal age distribution, high frequency of multiple drug use, and smaller social network size compared with HCV negative counterparts. Upon RDS-based enrollment completion and pending analysis we will further examine HIV RNA status as well as the specific associations between network size and other risk factors that may inform disease screening and treatment interventions. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.