Search

Objective To test the posterior-to-anterior stiffness (PAS) of a new thoracic spine training simulator under different conditions of “fixation.” Methods We constructed a thoracic spine model using plastic bones and ribs mounted in a wooden box, with skin and soft tissue simulated by layers of silicone and foam. The spine segment could be stiffened with tension applied to cords running through the vertebrae and ribs. We tested PAS at 2 tension levels using a custom-built device to apply repetitive loads at the T6 spinous process (SP) and over adjacent soft tissue (TP) while measuring load and displacement. Stiffness was the slope of the force-displacement curve from 55 to 75 N. Results Stiffness in the unconstrained (zero tension) condition over the SP averaged 11.98 N/mm and 6.72 N/mm over the TP. With tension applied, SP stiffness increased to 14.56 N/mm, and TP decreased to 6.15 N/mm. Conclusion Thoracic model compliance was similar to that reported for humans. The tension control system increased stiffness by 21.3% only over the SP. Stiffness over the TP was dominated by the lower stiffness of the thicker foam layer and did not change. The mannequin with these properties may be suitable for use in manual training of adjusting or PAS testing skills.

Objective Faced with COVID-19 safety protocols that severely limited the ability to conduct chiropractic technique instruction in the usual manner, our university invested the resources to develop a new mannequin lab for hands-on training, which would help supplement the loss of person-to-person contact. Methods Training mannequins could enable student learning of palpation and adjustment skills while avoiding close human–human contact. The university had developed a mannequin over the previous 4 years consisting of a full-sized human torso with individually movable and palpable vertebrae, pelvis, and thighs. In the mannequin, 64 pressure sensors are attached to particular vertebral and skeletal landmarks and provide feedback on palpation location and level of force applied. We assembled 3 teams to produce 20 copies of that mannequin for student use. Results Mannequins were produced in 7 weeks, and space was built out for a special lab. Faculty members are developing classroom procedures to introduce the mannequin to students, phase in the skills from static and motion palpation, and practice thrust performance. Conclusion The production run was successful, and the resulting equipment, well-received by students and faculty. In addition to helping teach manual skills, the lab serves as a platform for educational research to test the efficacy of mannequin-based training protocols. With the pressure sensors on known locations along the spine, future research may be able to test the ability of students to identify and contact specific target locations for adjustive thrusts.

Objective The purpose of this report is to describe care of a patient with chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia and bilateral vestibular hypofunction. Clinical Features A 66-year-old patient presented with limited eye movement and mild ptosis, which led to a diagnosis of chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia. Rotary chair testing suggested vestibular involvement. Other symptoms included dizziness, problems with balance, and chronic stiffness in his cervical and thoracic regions. He had anxiety about loss of function and limited exercise habits because of fear of falling. Examination methods included balance assessment, kinetic aspects of walking, and videonystagmography. Intervention and Outcome He had already begun regular practice of vestibular rehabilitation exercises before receiving 18 sessions of manual and instrument-assisted chiropractic manipulation, along with mobilization, stretching, and transverse massage, over 37 weeks. In addition to self-reported improvements, there was substantially decreased postural sway during balance assessment and there were small improvements in eye movement, ptosis, and walking. Conclusion This patient showed improvements in balance, eye movements, and walking while undergoing multimodal chiropractic care and practicing eye and balance exercises.

The purpose of this study was to develop a protocol and a data analysis system for the assessment of postures and movements of doctors of chiropractic during side-posture adjustments (SPAs), otherwise known as side-posture chiropractic spinal manipulation.For this study, an experienced chiropractor performed Gonstead-style lumbar SPAs on 10 participants. We used an inertial measurement unit system to record spinal angular motions and analyzed data with a custom application written in Microsoft Excel.Data collection was successful for all trials. We identified postural angles at the time of set-up and thrust and maximum and minimum angles in a period centered on the thrust. All spinal regions of the chiropractor were flexed during the entire period; otherwise, movement patterns were characterized by biphasic wavelike motions, which begin before the time of the thrust and finish afterward. Within each region and plane of motion, patterns were qualitatively similar between participants, but time of thrust was not consistent within the patterns. There was a wide range of angular velocities, and the fastest was measured in the chiropractor's cervical and thoracic regions.In this study, we developed a protocol and a data analysis system for assessment of chiropractors' postures and movements during SPAs. The protocol may be useful to future investigators who wish to use similar methods for educational purposes or to examine the role of optimal or suboptimal movement patterns in occupational injuries of doctors of chiropractic.

Objective The purpose of this report is to describe the role of on-site chiropractic care in one corporate environment. Methods A part-time chiropractic practice that provides services to a single company on site, 1 day per week, is described. Most care is oriented toward “wellness,” is paid for by the employer, and is limited only by the chiropractor’s few weekly hours of on-site availability. With approval from the company, the authors conducted an absenteeism analysis after obtaining ethics approval and consent from employee–patients who received care between 2012 and 2014. Comparisons of absenteeism rates of the sample were compared with lost worktime rates from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Labor Force Statistics. Results Of 40 current employees, 35 used chiropractic services; 17 employee–patients met the inclusion criteria. The lost worktime rates of those using chiropractic services (0.72%, 0.55%, and 0.67%, for 2012, 2013, and 2014, respectively) were lower than corresponding rates from Labor Force Statistics (1.5%, 1.2%, and 1.1%). Conclusions Absenteeism for the employee–patients was lower than equivalent national figures in this sample of workers. Though these results may or may not be related to the chiropractic care, these findings prompt further investigation into this relationship.

Objectives The purpose of this study was to measure faculty performance of simulated spinal manipulation on a mannequin to help identify teaching standards. Methods We measured 3-dimensional transmitted loads using a force plate mounted in the table. Thrusts were delivered through a compliant, jointed mannequin by faculty members along predefined “listings” as taught in lumbopelvic technique courses. Results Eleven chiropractic faculty members participated, delivering 9 thrusts at 3 loads (light, moderate, and heavy) along 9 different prone and side-posture listings, totaling 81 thrusts per participant. Single-hand Gonstead-style thrusts had variability in magnitude across participants and loads: light thrusts averaged 365 N (95% confidence interval [CI] 327-402), moderate thrusts 454 N (421-487), and heavy thrusts 682 N (623-740). All faculty members could easily distinguish the loads within their performances, but there was some crossover of load levels between participants. Thrust rates averaged 3.55 N/ms (95% CI 3.29-3.82). The dominant vector of prone thrusts was in the z direction (vertically downward), but side-to-side and inferior-to-superior vector components occurred. Conclusion Faculty member performance of simulated spinal manipulation indicated that they are able to control the thrust magnitude and rate as well as direction. In this sample, there was significant variability in peak loads between participants, which needs to be considered in student learning standards. These findings may be useful in translating the understanding of force characteristics to the technique teaching lab.

Objective: To assess the force profiles of high-velocity low-amplitude thrusts delivered to a mannequin on a force platform by novice students given only verbal instructions. Methods: Student volunteers untrained in adjusting delivered a series of adjustments to a mannequin on a force platform. Participants performed 3 light, 3 normal, and 3 heavy thrusts on 5 listings specifying contact point, hand, and direction. Force profiles were analyzed for speed and amplitude, consistency, and force discrimination. Two recording sessions occurred 10 weeks apart. Results: Sixteen participants (11 females, 5 male) completed the study. Peak forces ranged from 880 to 202 N for heavy thrusts and 322- to 66 N for light thrusts. Thrust rate was from 8.1 to 1.8 Newtons per millisecond. Average coefficients of variability (CV = STD/mean) at each load level (initial/final) were heavy: 17%/15%; normal: 16%/15%; and light: 20%/20%, with 0 as ideal. A force ratio measured students' abilities to distinguish thrust magnitude. The heavy/normal ratio (initial/final) was 1.35/1.39, and the light/normal ratio was 0.70/0.67. Conclusions: At this point, without force feedback being used in the classroom, novice students can produce thrusts that look like those of their teachers and of experienced practitioners, but they may not produce similar speed and force values. They are consistent within and between sessions and can discriminate between light and heavy loads. A natural next step in our educational research will be to measure adjustment factors on more experienced cohorts of students with and without the presence of force-feedback training apparatus.

The purpose of this study was to compare 2 alternative methods, the radiologic Harrison Posterior Tangent Method (HPTM) and the nonradiologic Spinal Mouse (SM), to the Cobb angle for measuring lumbar lordosis.Sixteen participants with previously existing lateral lumbopelvic radiographs underwent nonradiographic lordosis assessment with a Spinal Mouse. Then 2 investigators analyzed each radiograph twice using the Harrison Posterior Tangent Method and Cobb angle. Correlations were analyzed between HPTM, the Cobb angle, and SM using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient; intraexaminer and interexaminer agreement were analyzed for HPTM and the Cobb angle using intraclass correlation coefficients.The HPTM correlated highly with the Cobb angle (Spearman ρ = 0.936, P.001); SM had moderate to strong correlations with the Cobb angle (ρ = 0.737, P = .002) and HPTM (ρ = 0.707, P = .003). Intraexaminer and interexaminer agreement for the Cobb angle and HPTM were excellent (all intraclass correlation coefficients0.90). One participant had slight kyphosis according to HPTM and SM analyses (which consider the entire lumbar region), whereas the Cobb angle, based only on L1 and L5, reported mild lordosis for that participant.In this sample, HPTM measurements showed high correlation with the commonly used Cobb angle, but this method requires more time and effort, and normal values have not been established. The SM may be an alternative when radiographs are inappropriate, but it measures soft tissue contours rather than lordosis itself.

Objectives The purpose of this report is to describe the kinetic and kinematic analysis of walking gait following healed left proximal fifth metatarsal fractures. Clinical Features A 62-year-old female presented at a chiropractic clinic with concerns that recent metatarsal fractures had not fully resolved and reported abnormal gait due to pain and several weeks use of a “walking boot.” The patient’s walking gait was evaluated with a force-sensor treadmill and an inertial measurement unit motion capture system. Recordings were made before, at midpoint, and post-chiropractic care (11 visits total). Data were analyzed for spatio-temporal gait parameters, vertical ground reaction forces, and ranges of motion of the hip, knee, and ankle. Intervention and Outcome Pre-care, the patient’s self-rated disability in walking was 50 out of 80 on a Lower Extremity Functional Scale, which improved to 80 out of 80, post-care. Her self-selected preferred walking speed increased, as did step length, cadence, and single support time. Increased symmetry was seen in timing of peak ground reaction forces, stance phase percentages of loading and pre-swing, and ranges of motion for hip and knee flexion and extension. Conclusions The patient recovered completely, and the post-injury kinematic and kinetic data allowed for quantification of gait patterns and changes in the clinical environment.

Some women complain of low back pain that they believe is due to wearing high-heeled shoes, and some clinicians seem to think the reason is that high-heeled shoes cause increased lumbar lordosis. This article examines Internet information aimed at the general public and presents a literature review of available research in this area.The keywords high heels and high-heeled shoes, combined with the words lumbar, lordosis, and pelvic tilt, were used in an Internet search of Ask.com; in published literature searches of PubMed, MANTIS, CINAHL, Scopus, and ProceedingsFirst; and in searches for theses and dissertations of PapersFirst through June 2010.There are many Internet sites that support the belief that high-heeled shoes cause increased lordosis. However, published research for this topic mostly does not support this belief; but some mixed results, small subject groups, and questionable methods have left the issue unclear.It appears that some health care providers are offering advice about the effect of high-heeled shoes on lumbar lordosis that conflicts with most published research. However, the prevalence of such advice is unknown; and the published research is equivocal. Considering that both low back pain and the wearing of high heeled-shoes are common, clinicians could use some clearer guidance; this is an area that deserves further investigation.

Objective: We developed an adjusting bench with a force plate supporting the lumbar portion to measure loads transmitted during lumbar manual adjustment. It will be used to provide force-feedback to enhance student learning in technique labs. The study goal is to define the learning target loads and speeds, with instructors as expert models. Methods: A total of 11 faculty members experienced in teaching Gonstead technique methods performed 81 simulated adjustments on a mannequin on the force plate. Adjustments were along 9 lumbopelvic “listings” at 3 load levels: light, normal, and heavy. We analyzed the thrusts to find preload, peak load, duration, and thrust rate. Results: Analysis of 891 thrusts showed wide variations between doctors. Peak loads ranged from 100 to 1400 N. All doctors showed clear distinctions between peak load levels, but there was overlap between high and low loads. Thrust rates were more uniform across doctors, averaging 3 N/ms. Conclusion: These faculty members delivered a range of thrusts, not unlike those seen in the literature for high velocity, low amplitude manipulation. We have established at least minimum force and speed targets for student performance, but more work must be done to create a normative adjustment to guide refinement of student learning.

Objective The aim of this study was to look for differences between patients with an increased pain response as compared with those with a decreased pain response. Methods Data were collected from consecutive new patients with lumbar or lumbopelvic pain in a chiropractic clinic. A pelvic tilt exercise was included in the initial examination, and pain response was noted. Analysis was made of pain and disability severity, as well as symptom location, chronicity, and other characteristics, before and after a course of chiropractic care. Results Patients with an increased pain response to pelvic tilt (n = 12) had higher levels of pain and disability at baseline than patients without (n = 34). There were no between-group differences in other aspects of their complaints; in age, sex, or body mass; or in the types of care they received (eg, manipulation, stretching, exercise instruction). On the average, both groups of patients showed improvement with chiropractic care, and there was no detectable difference in improvement between groups. Conclusions This study found that patients experiencing pain in response to a pelvic tilt maneuver may have a poorer precare status than patients with a decreased pain response.

I read with some interest the recent article in European Spine Journal by Dai et al. [1], High-heeled-related alterations in the static sagittal profile of the spino-pelvic structure in young women. I think there are interesting aspects of the study but that it also has some problems. I wish to comment on a couple of points involving the effect of high-heeled shoes on lumbar lordosis. When Dai et al. make the statement that ‘‘Some studies have shown that high heels increase lumbar lordosis...’’ they cited Cowley’s 2009 review article [2]. Note that Cowley’s article was not a ‘‘study’’, but rather a review of the literature. In fact, not only did Cowley NOT conclude that high-heeled shoes increase lordosis, she cited studies by de Lateur and Snow showing no significant difference in lordosis for different heel heights [3, 4], and a study by Franklin [5] that found decreased lordosis. Dai et al. themselves incorrectly cite Snow [4] as having found increased lordosis. The authors did not mention several other studies of highheeled shoes and lordosis and, therefore, failed to show they have a familiarity with the previous research on the topic—something which would not have been a difficult task, as they only needed to read about a dozen articles. I believe European Spine Journal’s peer reviewers did not do an adequate job of screening the references. My main complaint, though, is their conclusion that their findings of increased lumbar lordosis ‘‘...may help explain why some women complain that wearing highheeled shoes causes them to experience low back pain.’’ No, their findings do not do that at all. Dai et al. studied teenagers with little or no experience in wearing highheeled shoes, beyond the 1-h adaptation in the study. Female patients with low back pain, however, are typically adult women in the range of, say, 30–50 years, who may wear high-heeled shoes often, for many hours per day, and for many years. Dai et al. may have missed the part of Cowley’s article that cited Opila-Correia [6], who found increased spinal lumbar lordosis in inexperienced wearers of high heels, an effect ‘‘not evident in experienced wearers, indicating the potential habituation in experienced wearers of high heels’’ [2], and perhaps overlooked the implications of that statement for their own study. Their future research does not simply need a larger sample size— it needs a sample more representative of a population with back pain. The major problem is that most people will only read the conclusion. Internet media outlets will perhaps pick it up and reinforce the urban myth of high-heeled shoes increasing lumbar lordosis. If so, Dai et al. have undone decades of research that mostly, for the general population, contradicts their findings. Their study might have been sound from a pure science approach but has little external validity. It is my opinion that the above points should be revised for a final publication version of the article.

Some doctors and therapists believe that wearing high-heeled shoes causes increased lumbar lordosis and that this may be a cause of low back pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether high-heeled shoes increase lumbar lordosis and to do so with more reliable methods and a larger sample size than used in previous studies.Fifty participants from a chiropractic university were included in a test group (32 female and 18 male) and 9 in a control group (3 female and 6 male). A Spinal Mouse was used to measure lumbar lordosis in test participants barefoot and then again with 3- or 4-in high-heeled shoes after a 10-minute adaptation period of walking and sitting and standing while wearing the shoes. Reliability of the testing conditions was evaluated with 9 barefoot control participants before and after an identical adaptation period, and intra- and interexaminer reliability of Spinal Mouse measurements was tested by use of a wooden model built to mimic the proportions of a human spine.Both groups showed non-significant decreases in lordosis between the first and second scans (high heels: 23.4° to 22.8°, P = .17; control: 18.8° to 17.6°, P = .16). Scans of the wooden spine model were highly reliable (intra- and interexaminer intraclass correlation coefficients.999).Consistent with most previous studies, high-heeled shoes did not affect lumbar lordosis in most people while standing. Future research could investigate the effect of shoes during dynamic conditions or identify affected subgroups.

Upton and McComas claimed that most patients with carpal tunnel syndrome not only have compressive lesions at the wrist, but also show evidence of damage to cervical nerve roots. This "double crush" hypothesis has gained some popularity among chiropractors because it seems to provide a rationale for adjusting the cervical spine in treating carpal tunnel syndrome. Here I examine use of the concept by chiropractors, summarize findings from the literature, and critique several studies aimed at supporting or refuting the hypothesis. Although the hypothesis also has been applied to nerve compressions other than those leading to carpal tunnel syndrome, this discussion mainly examines the original application – "double crush" involving both cervical spinal nerve roots and the carpal tunnel. I consider several categories: experiments to create double crush syndrome in animals, case reports, literature reviews, and alternatives to the original hypothesis. A significant percentage of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome also have neck pain or cervical nerve root compression, but the relationship has not been definitively explained. The original hypothesis remains controversial and is probably not valid, at least for sensory disturbances, in carpal tunnel syndrome. However, even if the original hypothesis is importantly flawed, evaluation of multiple sites still may be valuable. The chiropractic profession should develop theoretical models to relate cervical dysfunction to carpal tunnel syndrome, and might incorporate some alternatives to the original hypothesis. I intend this review as a starting point for practitioners, educators, and students wishing to advance chiropractic concepts in this area.

Background There has been little published about ulnar tunnel syndrome (UTS) as it relates to the practice of chiropractic, despite chiropractors' apparent interest in nerve compression syndromes and a growing trend toward providing chiropractic extremity care. This syndrome is not very common and could be mistaken for carpal tunnel syndrome by practitioners who are not aware of the differences. Objective To discuss the case of a patient with ulnar tunnel syndrome whose symptoms were resolved by chiropractic extremity adjustment. Clinical features A 45-year-old female patient complained of numbness in her little finger. Standard orthopedic testing procedures for the wrist and hand reproduced the symptom, but tests for the cervical spine and thoracic outlet region were negative. Intervention and outcome Care for this patient consisted of adjustment procedures directed to the wrist, primarily the hamate and pisiform articulations with the triquetrum. Her symptoms were resolved in 4 office visits, with corresponding improvement in examination findings. Conclusions This case report represents what a patient could expect during a typical chiropractic treatment. The examination and the care given were simple and cost-effective but might not be sufficient for a more complicated or persistent case. The costs for the care in this case were borne solely by the patient and were affordable. Hard conclusions cannot be reached without more sophisticated diagnostic procedures, additional similar cases, and controlled research conditions.