Childhood obesity has reached epidemic proportions in Canada. According to the 2009–2011 Canadian Health Measures Survey, close to one-third of children aged 5–17 years (approximately 1.6 million children) were classified as overweight (19.8%) or obese (11.7%).1 As the percentage of obese children increases, so too does the percentage of obese children visiting the emergency department (ED). Sivet2 has demonstrated that appendicitis is the most common condition in children requiring emergency abdominal surgery and, therefore, one of the most commonly screened diseases in children presenting to the ED with abdominal pain. The rising rate of obesity among pediatric ED patients, combined with the frequency of appendicitis, presents a growing quandary for the managing physician. The morbidity and mortality associated with a perforated appendix leads the physician to vigilance in ruling out appendicitis, typically via history, physical examination and laboratory tests, followed by diagnostic imaging, typically in the form of ultrasonography. Unfortunately, obesity also constitutes an independent predictor for a nondiagnostic ultrasound.3 This leads the surgeon to either treat the patient based on clinical findings or to order additional imaging, typically in the form of abdominal computed tomography (CT). According to a recent Canadian study, these diagnostic difficulties result in obese children suspected of having appendicitis being 3 times more likely to receive abdominal CT than nonobese children.4 Other than the increased rate of CT, the authors found no significant difference in outcomes between the 2 groups. As a result, they suggested that obese pediatric patients with suspected appendicitis and nondiagnostic ultrasounds should receive abdominal CT more frequently than nonobese patients. While this recommendation appears logical based on the evidence, several issues make such a suggestion dubious in the absence of further evidence. The study did not quantify what contribution these CT scans made to patient diagnosis and management. It is difficult to truly evaluate the role of CT in the management of pediatric appendicitis in the absence of such data. This is especially true given the conclusions of 3 previous studies.5–7 Two of them5,6 argued that the increased use of CT among pediatric patients with appendicitis has not contributed substantially to a lower rate of negative appendectomies and may in fact increase perforation rates. The third study7 argued that focused appendiceal CT does not increase the accuracy of diagnosis compared with history, physical examination and laboratory studies. Furthermore, the ionizing radiation delivered by abdominal CT has been increasingly identified as a contraindication for CT imaging in the pediatric population. According to one estimate, a single occurrence of abdominal CT in a child imparts a lifetime risk of radiation-induced cancer of 26.1 per 100 000 in girls and 20.4 per 100 000 in boys.8 These potentially negative health outcomes led the Canadian Association of Radiologists to recommend that, when ultrasounds are nondiagnostic and clinical suspicion for appendicitis is high, surgeons consider treating without further imaging (i.e., CT).9 These disparate claims necessitate that the influence of CT on the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis be quantified so that informed management decisions can be made. The influence of abdominal CT on the diagnosis and treatment of obese pediatric patients with suspected appendicitis is currently unknown. This information is important because it will allow surgeons to make better evidence-based decisions when considering the impact a CT scan may or may not have on a pediatric patient’s diagnosis and management. One study conducted in an adult population10 indicated that CT imaging rarely changed management in patients whose presentations were highly suspicious for appendicitis, but frequently changed management if the clinical diagnosis was indeterminate. However, this study did not include children, and did not differentiate based on weight, both of which are key determinants in the present discussion. A previous pediatric study11 compared outcomes of obese and nonobese patients with appendicitis; however, this study examined outcomes only from patients who underwent appendectomy, did not include a focus on the role of CT in those outcomes and failed to use the most appropriate measurement for classifying obesity — body mass index (BMI) — when categorizing patients (instead, the study used standard deviations from mean weight for age). We were therefore interested in accomplishing 2 main objectives with this study. The first was to quantify abdominal CT rates and purposes among both obese and nonobese pediatric patients with suspected appendicitis. After identifying which abdominal CT scans were ordered to confirm or rule out the preliminary clinical diagnosis of appendicitis, our second objective was to quantify and analyze the influence those scans had on the preliminary clinical diagnosis of appendicitis for both obese and nonobese pediatric patients.