Search

Background The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) quantifies the total work associated with procedures based on recommendations from the Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC). To determine the amount of work for a procedure, the RUC relies on data gathered via surveys from practicing physicians. Investigation of the accuracy of the RUC’s estimates of physician work have shown that there are discrepancies between the RUC times used to calculate work and times determined objectively. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of the RUC/CMS’s current times and work relative value units (wRVU) for the perioperative work involved regarding shoulder arthroplasty. Methods The RUC was contacted to obtain a list of perioperative tasks for shoulder arthroplasty surgeries. The tasks that occurred outside of the OR were timed as the event occurred, while times for tasks performed inside the OR were determined from the EMR. Each task’s time was then multiplied by its respective CMS assigned intensity coefficient to calculate the wRVU. Results The tasks timed in this study were allotted 105 minutes by the RUC and a total wRVU of 2.1. Our study found that these same tasks took 119.5 minutes and had a total wRVU of 2.4. The overall time it takes to perform perioperative tasks in shoulder arthroplasty surgeries is underestimated by 14.5 minutes resulting in an undervaluation of the wRVUs by 0.3. Conclusion The perioperative work associated with shoulder arthroplasty surgeries is underestimated by the CMS/RUC. The RUC and CMS should consider using prospective, empiric times when calculating physician work as it is a more accurate measurement than the current method used. This discrepancy is expected to be amplified with increased preoperative templating and utilization of technological advancements in arthroplasty. Further study is needed on a broader national or international level to determine if this discrepancy exists systemically.

The USMLE Step 1 examination has been used as an objective measure for comparing residency applicants. Recently, the National Board of Medical Examiners and the Federation of State Medical Boards decided that the USMLE Step 1 examination will transition to a pass/fail result starting no earlier than 2022. The purpose of this study was to investigate the perspective of medical students who applied for orthopaedic surgery residency positions during the 2019 to 2020 interview cycle on the USMLE scoring change, and the potential effect this change may result in for future applicants and the residency selection process.A 15-item anonymous web-based survey was sent to 1,090 orthopaedic surgery residency applicants from four regionally diverse residency programs. The survey elicited attitudes toward the transition of the Step 1 examination to pass/fail and perspectives this change may or may not have on the residency selection process.Responses were received from 356 applicants (32.7%). The majority (61.6%) disagreed with the change to pass/fail scoring, and 68.5% do not believe that the change will decrease stress levels in medical students. For interview invitations, respondents chose Step 2 clinical knowledge, letters of recommendation, and performance on away rotations as the most influential factors in the absence of a Step 1 score.Most of the students surveyed who applied for an orthopaedic surgery residency position during the most recent application cycle disagreed with the National Board of Medical Examiner/Federation of State Medical Board decision to change Step 1 to pass/fail and feel that this change may have disadvantage in certain student groups while either increasing or having no effect on medical student stress.IV.

The primary objective of this study was to analyze the relationship of percentage of surgical overlap with patient outcomes to determine if a detrimental level of overlap exists.Overlapping surgery (OS) is defined as one attending physician supervising two or more operative cases simultaneously, without the critical portions of the cases occurring concurrently. To date, no study has examined the relationship of percent overlap, or the percentage of one case that is spent overlapping with another, to outcomes, efficiency, safety, and complications.This study is a retrospective cohort study conducted at a large tertiary referral center. The primary outcomes of interest included operative duration, in-hospital mortality, 30-day readmission, and patient safety indicators (PSIs). The Cochran-Armitage test for trend was used to evaluate the outcomes of interest. P values of ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant.A total of 87,426 cases were included in this study. There were 62,332 cases without overlap (Group 0), 10,514 cases with 1-25% overlap (Group 1), 5,303 cases with 26-50% overlap (Group 2), 4,296 cases with 51-75% overlap (Group 3), and 4,981 cases with75% overlap (Group 4). In-hospital mortality decreased as overlap increased (ptrend0.0001). Operative time increased with increasing overlap (ptrend0.0001) while readmission rates showed no statistical significance between groups (ptrend=0.5078). Rates of patient safety indicators were lower for Groups 1, 2 and 3 (1.69%, 2.01% and 2.08%) when compared to Group 0 (2.24%). Group 4 had the highest rate of patient safety indicators at 2.35% (P=0.0086).Overlapping surgery was shown to have reduced in-hospital mortality and similar patient safety indicator and readmission rates when compared to non-overlapping cases. Operative time was shown to increase in overlapping surgeries when compared to non-overlapping surgeries. The results from this study indicate that the percentage of surgical overlap does not detrimentally affect most patient outcomes, especially with overlap of less than 75%.

Objective Operating room (OR) fires are considered "never events," but approximately 650 events occur annually in the United States. Our aim was to detail fires occurring during orthopedic procedures via a questionnaire because of the limited information present on this topic. Methods A 25-question survey on witnessing surgical fires, hospital policies on surgical fires, and surgeons' perspective on OR fires was sent to 617 orthopedic surgeons in 18 institutions whose residency program is a member of the Collaborative Orthopaedic Educational Research Group. The response rate was 28%, with 172 surgeons having completed the survey. Results Twelve of the 172 orthopedic surgeons surveyed reported witnessing at least 1 surgical fire in an OR setting. Electrocautery was the leading ignition source, causing fires in 7 events. A saw, laser, and light source were reported to have caused 1 fire each. Regarding fuel source for the fires, bone cement was a common culprit (n = 4), followed by gauze (n = 3). Oxygen delivery to patients was via a closed system in most cases (n = 9). No patient harm was reported in any of these cases.Just under half of the respondents (47.7%) reported not receiving any formal OR fire prevention or response training. The most common answer for frequency of concern about a surgical fire was "never" (42.4%). Conclusions Fires pose a risk in surgery, even in an orthopedics setting. Room oxygen can supply enough oxidizing power for a fire to occur, especially with the ubiquitous nature of ignition sources and fuels in the OR. Prevention is key with these events. Operating room personnel education must be sought, and surgeons should be mindful of the fire components in the OR.

Background Percutaneous fixation of proximal humeral fractures places the axillary nerve and posterior humeral circumflex artery at risk for injury. Safe operative zones for the axillary nerve are described based on external measurements from anatomic landmarks, but no study to date has incorporated advanced imaging to help guide surgical procedures in the region of the axillary neurovascular bundle (ANVB). We sought to define the location and trajectory of the ANVB in relation to osseous landmarks using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements. Methods Retrospective review of 750 consecutive MRI studies was performed with 55 imaging studies meeting inclusion criteria for patient positioning, image alignment, and quality. Five measurements were performed including the distance from mid-lateral acromion to lateral ANVB, mid-lateral acromion to medial ANVB, greater tuberosity to lateral ANVB, vertical distance between inferior anatomic neck and lateral ANVB, and angle the ANVB crosses the humerus. Height, gender, and age were recorded. Analysis was performed using ANOVA and Pearson correlation tests. Results The lateral ANVB was below the inferior articular margin of the humeral head by an average of 12.9 ± 3.9 mm and within a 22 mm window. It was an average of 57.4 ± 5.1 mm from the lateral mid-acromion, and 34.7 ± 4.3 mm below the greater tuberosity. The angle formed by the ANVB crossing the humerus averaged 19.5 ± 3.9 degrees upward from medial to lateral. Height and gender directly impacted measurements. Conclusions The use of the inferior humeral head articular margin provides a radiographic landmark to aid intraoperative lateral ANVB assessment which may be helpful during percutaneous fracture fixation.

Around one third of patients who undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) will eventually have the contralateral knee replaced. Overall patient satisfaction after staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty procedures performed on different days is reportedly similar to unilateral TKA. Nevertheless, in our anecdotal experience patients often report less satisfying outcomes following the second side. A cursory review of available literature tended to confirm that observation. We sought therefore to consolidate all of the available data on this issue to further investigate this phenomenon.To consolidate available published data revealing satisfaction scores among patients following staged bilateral TKA, and to evaluate the phenomenon of less satisfying results following TKA2.A systematic review of available literature reporting on satisfaction with TKA1 and TKA2 after staged bilateral knee arthroplasty was undertaken using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase. From 427 records, five full-length articles met criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The data were then extracted and assessed on the basis of theA total of 1889 patients with an average age of 68 (range: 38-92) underwent staged bilateral TKA with outcomes reported at 1 year following each TKA with a mean 21.9 mo between surgeries (range: 2 d to 14.5 years). Overall satisfaction with both knees was 83.70% (1581) and dissatisfaction with both knees was 2.75% (52). In the remaining 13.56% (256) who were dissatisfied with one side, 61.0% were dissatisfied with TKA2, and 39.0% were dissatisfied with TKA1. Patient-reported outcome scores for TKA2 were frequently lower than TKA1 even in patients reporting overall satisfaction with both knees.At 1-year follow-up, there was a 50% greater risk of dissatisfaction with TKA2 among the 13.56% of patients reporting dissatisfaction in one knee after staged bilateral TKA. Whether the interval between procedures or long-term follow-up changes these results requires further investigation.

Objectives Residents receiving industry payments are not legally required to be reported on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments Database. The purpose of this study is to review reporting of orthopedic surgery residents and identify the trends for which payments or transfers in value were received. Design The CMS Open Payments Database was used to search for all available orthopedic residents from 2014 to 2016. All data available on the CMS Open Payments Database was recorded. Setting/Participants This is a database study. Participants are residents reported in the CMS Open Payments Database. Results Over the 3-year period, 6832 resident “entities” were identified from 151 programs. A total of 3217 entities (47%) were reported as receiving payments from industry during this time period. This totaled $3,786,754 over the 3 year study period. The largest itemized categories for payment were education (32.5%) and grants (30.9%) totaling more than $2.4 million. Other areas of payment included travel (17.0%), food (16.0%), consultation fee (1.7%), research (0.8%), speaker fee (0.7%), gift (0.1%), honoraria (0.1%), and other (0.02%). Conclusion Overall, 47% of orthopedic resident entities were reported on the CMS Open Payments Database. The vast majority of payments were related to education and grants. Residents should become familiar with how to navigate the Open Payments Database and be educated on maintaining appropriate relationships with industry.

Background Isolated greater tuberosity fractures account for up to a fifth of all proximal humeral fractures. There have been several retrospective cohort studies and case series reporting outcomes after treatment of this pathology. This study aims to report on the clinical outcomes of surgically treated isolated greater tuberosity fractures, as well as diagnostic workup and complications associated with fracture fixation. Methods A systematic review was performed under PRISMA guidelines to identify studies that reported the results or clinical outcomes of isolated greater tuberosity fracture. The searches were performed using MEDLINE through PubMed, the Elsevier Embase database, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Results Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria comprising 345 patients and 345 shoulders. The mean age was 52.9 years and mean follow-up was 3.4 months. The mean postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon Score, the most frequently utilized patient reported outcome measure across studies, was 90.1% of ideal maximum. All studies used standard shoulder radiographs in their initial workup and most commonly referred to a minimum of 5 mm displacement as an indication for surgery. Fifty five percent of patients were treated using open fixation and 35.9 with arthroscopic fixation. Ninety three percent of patients were able to return to work. A total of fifty-two (15.1%) complications were reported in the included studies. Conclusions The current literature describes overall satisfactory functional outcomes and minimal occupational morbidity following either open or arthroscopic fixation of isolated greater tuberosity fractures despite a notable rate of complications. Level of Evidence IV, systematic review.

The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons multicenter taskforce studying proximal humerus fractures reached no consensus on which outcome measures to include in future studies, and currently no gold standard exists. Knowledge of commonly used outcome measures will allow standardization, enabling more consistent proximal humerus fracture treatment comparison. This study identifies the most commonly reported outcome measures for proximal humerus fracture management in recent literature.A systematic review identified all English-language articles assessing proximal humerus fractures from 2008 to 2018 using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Review articles, meta-analyses, revision surgery, chronic injuries, studies with15 patients, studies with12 month follow-up, anatomic/biomechanical studies, and technique articles were excluded. Included studies were assessed for patient demographics and outcome scores, patient satisfaction, complications, range of motion, and strength.Of 655 articles, 74 met inclusion criteria. The number of proximal humerus fractures averaged 74.2 per study (mean patient age, 65.6 years). Mean follow-up was 30.7 months. Neer type 1, 2, 3, and 4 fractures were included in 8%, 51%, 81%, and 88% of studies, respectively. Twenty-two patient-reported outcome instruments were used including the Constant-Murley score (65%), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (31%), visual analog scale pain (27%), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (18%). An average of 2.2 measures per study were reported.Considerable variability exists in the use of outcome measures across the proximal humerus fracture literature, making treatment comparison challenging. We recommend that future literature on proximal humerus fractures use at least 3 outcomes measures and 1 general health score until the optimal scores are determined.

Orthopaedic trauma presents a unique and complex challenge in the initial phase of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) global crisis. Little is currently known about the surgical practices in orthopaedic emergencies in the early days of the COVID-19 outbreak (1). This is a retrospective case series of 10 orthopaedic trauma patients who underwent fracture fixation in March 2020. Of the 10 patients testing COVID-19 positive, there were a total of 16 long bone fractures, 5 pelvic ring fractures, and 1 lumbar burst fracture. There were 7 (70%) males in this cohort. Two (20%) of the COVID-positive patients did not develop fever, leukocytosis, respiratory insufficiency, or positive imaging findings and were younger (average age 25.5 years) with fewer comorbidities (average 0.5) compared with the 8 symptomatic COVID-19-positive patients (56.6 years with 1.88 comorbidities). Advancement of COVID-19 pathogenesis with lung opacities and prolonged intubation occurred in all 5 patients who remained on ventilation postoperatively (range 9 hours-11 days). At the time of most recent follow-up, all patients survived, 1 continues to require ventilation support, 1 remains admitted without ventilation support, and 8 (80%) were discharged to home. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Introduction The numeric score for the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 is one of the only universal, objective, scaled criteria for comparing the many students who apply to orthopaedic surgery residency. However, on February 12, 2020, it was announced that Step 1 would be transitioning to pass/fail scoring. The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the most important factors used for interview and resident selection after this change and (2) to assess how these factors have changed compared with a previous report on resident selection. Methods A survey was distributed to the program directors (PDs) of all 179 orthopaedic surgery programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Questions focused on current resident selection practices and the impact of the Step 1 score transition on expected future practices. Results A total of 78 PDs (44%) responded to the survey. Over half of PDs (59%) responded that United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 clinical knowledge (CK) score is the factor that will increase most in importance after Step 1 transitions to pass/fail, and 90% will encourage applicants to include their Step 2 CK score on their applications. The factors rated most important in resident selection from zero to 10 were subinternship performance (9.05), various aspects of interview performance (7.49 to 9.01), rank in medical school (7.95), letters of recommendation (7.90), and Step 2 CK score (7.27). Compared with a 2002 report, performance on manual skills testing, subinternship performance, published research, letters of recommendations, and telephone call on applicants' behalf showed notable increases in importance. Discussion As Step 2 CK is expected to become more important in the residency application process, current applicant stress on Step 1 scores may simply move to Step 2 CK scores. Performance on subinternships will remain a critical aspect of residency application, as it was viewed as the most important resident selection factor and has grown in importance compared with a previous report.

Introduction Residents may differentially experience high stress and poor sleep across multiple post-graduate years (PGYs), negatively affecting safety. This study characterized sleep and stress among medical and surgical residents across multiple PGYs and at specific times surrounding duty. Method Thirty-two medical and surgical residents (Mage = 28.6 years; 56% male) across PGYs 1–5 participated in 3 appointments (immediately before duty, after duty, and on an off day) providing 96 data points. Sleep, stress, and occupational fatigue were measured by both self-report and objectively (actigraphy, salivary coritsol). Results Residents averaged 7 h of actigraphy-estimated sleep per night but varied ±3 h day-to-day. Residents reported clinically poor sleep quality. Life stress decreased by PGY-2. All residents averaged elevated life stress values. Poor sleep quality did not differ among PGY cohorts. Discussion Poor sleep quality is similar between early residency cohorts (PGY-1) and later residency cohorts (PGY-3+). Persistent fatigue is highest in later residency cohorts. Even the most experienced residents may struggle with persisting fatigue. Current hour policies may have shortcomings in addressing this risk.

Sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) instability is a rare condition and results from either a traumatic high energy impact, such as a motor vehicle crash or contact sports injury, or non-traumatically as a result of structural pathology. The infrequency of this injury has contributed to its diagnosis being missed as well as the paucity of literature on treatment and outcomes. Patients with SCJ instability often report diminished range of motion as well as shoulder girdle pain. The presentation of instability in the sternoclavicular joint can vary in severity and anterior or posterior directionality. Variation in severity of the instability changes the course of treatment regarding either operative or non-operative interventions to stabilize the SCJ. In general, anterior instability of the SCJ (the medial clavicle is displaced anterior to the sternum) is less urgent and generally manageable by symptom alleviation and rehabilitation, although some anterior instability cases require surgical intervention. In the case of posterior SCJ instability (the medial clavicle is displaced posterior to the sternum), patients require prompt joint reduction as they are at the greater risk of life-threatening injury due to the location of critical structures of the mediastinum posterior to the SCJ. Computed tomography visualization is useful to confirm dislocation or subluxation direction to better formulate a proper treatment plan. The purpose of this review is to report the clinical presentation and management of SCJ instability including pertinent symptoms, the diagnostic approaches to evaluating SCJ instability, as well as operative and non-operative management of the joint instability.

BACKGROUND: Burnout and depression among healthcare professionals and trainees remain alarmingly common. In 2009, 56% of orthopaedic surgery residents reported burnout. Alcohol and illicit drug use are potential exacerbating factors of burnout and depression; however, these have been scarcely studied in residency populations. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What proportion of orthopaedic residents report symptoms of burnout and depression? (2) What factors are independently associated with an orthopaedic resident reporting emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, low personal accomplishment, and depression? (3) What proportion of orthopaedic residents report hazardous alcohol or drug use? (4) What factors are independently associated with an orthopaedic resident reporting hazardous alcohol or drug use? METHODS: We asked 164 orthopaedic surgery programs to have their residents participate in a 34-question internet-based, anonymous survey, 28% of which (46 of 164) agreed. The survey was distributed to all 1147 residents from these programs, and 58% (661 of 1147) of these completed the survey. The respondents were evenly distributed among training years. Eighty-three percent (551 of 661) were men, 15% (101 of 661) were women, and 1% (nine of 661) preferred not to provide their gender. The survey asked about demographics, educational debt, sleep and work habits, perceived peer or program support, and substance use, and validated instruments were used to assess burnout (abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-2), and hazardous alcohol use (Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test—Consumption). The main outcome measures included overall burnout, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, low personal accomplishment, depression, and hazardous alcohol and drug use. Using the variables gathered in the survey, we performed an exploratory analysis to identify significant associations for each of the outcomes, followed by a multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Burnout was reported by 52% (342 of 661) of residents. Thirteen percent of residents (83 of 656) had positive screening results for depression. Factors independently associated with high emotional exhaustion scores included early training year (odds ratio 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.32; p = 0.03) unmanageable work volume (OR 3.13; 95% CI, 1.45-6.67; p < 0.01), inability to attend health maintenance appointments (OR 3.23; 95% CI, 1.69-6.25; p < 0.01), lack of exercise (OR 1.69; 95% CI, 1.08-2.70; p = 0.02), and lack of program support (OR 3.33; 95% CI, 2.00-5.56; p < 0.01). Factors independently associated with depersonalization included early training year (OR 1.27; 95% CI, 1.12-1.41; p < 0.01), inability to attend health maintenance appointments (OR 2.70; 95% CI, 1.67-4.35; p < 0.01), and lack of co-resident support (OR 2.52; 95% CI, 1.52-4.18; p < 0.01). Low personal accomplishment was associated with a lack of co-resident support (OR 2.85; 95% CI, 1.54-5.28; p < 0.01) and lack of program support (OR 2.33; 95% CI, 1.32-4.00; p < 0.01). Factors associated with depression included exceeding duty hour restrictions (OR 2.50; 95% CI, 1.43-4.35; p < 0.01) and lack of program support (OR 3.85; 95% CI, 2.08-7.14; p < 0.01). Sixty-one percent of residents (403 of 656) met the criteria for hazardous alcohol use. Seven percent of residents (48 of 656) reported using recreational drugs in the previous year. Factors independently associated with hazardous alcohol use included being a man (OR 100; 95% CI, 35-289; p < 0.01), being Asian (OR 0.31; 95% CI, 0.17-0.56; p < 0.01), single or divorced marital status (OR 2.33; 95% CI, 1.47-3.68; p < 0.01), and more sleep per night (OR 1.92; 95% CI, 1.21-3.06; p < 0.01). Finally, single or divorced marital status was associated with drug use in the past year (OR 2.30; 95% CI, 1.26-4.18; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The lack of wellness among orthopaedic surgery residents is troubling, especially because most of the associated risk factors are potentially modifiable. Programs should capitalize on the modifiable elements to combat burnout and improve overall wellbeing. Programs should also educate residents on burnout, focus on work volume, protect access to health maintenance, nurture those in the early years of training, and remain acutely aware of the risk of substance abuse. Orthopaedic surgery trainees should strive to encourage peer support, cultivate personal responsibility, and advocate for themselves or peers when faced with challenges. At a minimum, programs and educational leaders should foster an environment in which admitting symptoms of burnout is not seen as a weakness or failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.

Through an iteration of various advancements, both short stem and stemless options for humeral fixation have been proposed and have shown clinical promise. The proposed benefits of a stemless humeral implant include greater bone preservation, less stress shielding, less risk of a diaphyseal stress riser, decreased surgical time, and less intraoperative blood loss. Potential downsides include the dependence on proximal bone quality for fixation, increased cost, the dependence on the strength of subscapularis fixation, and pending FDA approval for multiple implants. The purpose of this article is to review the evidence behind stemless implants including the biomechanical advantages and disadvantages, surgical technique, and clinical outcomes.

Significant attention has been directed at evaluating reimbursement rates to orthopedic surgeons for various surgical procedures. To evaluate patients' understanding of the surgeon reimbursement process, studies using patient surveys have been conducted to determine patients' perceptions of orthopedic surgeon compensation. To date, there has been no systematic review to consolidate the data of these studies. This study aimed to synthesize the findings of these individual studies across multiple subspecialties of orthopedic surgery to evaluate the potential discrepancy between how much patients believe orthopedic surgeons are reimbursed and the actual reimbursement rate. We performed a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify studies that report findings of patient perceptions of orthopedic surgeon reimbursement for various procedures. Searches were conducted using MEDLINE through PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Summary estimates of reimbursement discrepancies across subspecialties and overall were reported as unweighted averages of the individual study results within each group. Twelve studies were identified that met inclusion criteria, constituting 4309 surveys. These survey studies measured patients' perceptions of how much orthopedic surgeons are reimbursed for common procedures, including anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, arthroscopic meniscectomy, carpal tunnel release, rotator cuff repair, multiple spine procedures and total shoulder, hip, and knee arthroplasty. It was found that patients reported reasonable surgeon's fees to be 11.2 times more than actual Medicare reimbursement. Among individual studies, the largest discrepancies were seen in total hip arthroplasty (26 times), whereas the smallest difference was in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (1.6 times). On average, patients estimated Medicare reimbursement rates to be 5.9 times higher than the actual surgeon reimbursement. Patients consistently overestimate how much orthopedic surgeons are reimbursed for common orthopedic procedures. The results of this systematic review suggest that patients may value these procedures more than what Medicare reimburses. Such information may help educate the public, direct policy, and increase transparency between orthopedic surgeons and patients.

BACKGROUND The Sunshine Act aims to increase the transparency of physicians receiving compensation from pharmaceutical and medical device companies. Nine states have supplementary legislation in addition to the Federal Sunshine Act. The purpose of this study is to assess the characteristics of financial compensation to orthopaedic residents on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments Database in states with more restrictive regulations compared with those without additional restrictions. METHODS A complete list of accredited orthopaedic residency programs in the United States was compiled using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and American Osteopathic Academy of Orthopedics websites. The website of each orthopaedic residency program was searched to compile a list of residents who attended their program from 2014 to 2016. The CMS Open Payments Database was used to search the residents identified for the corresponding years. All data available on the CMS Open Payments Database were recorded. RESULTS Over the 3-year period, 3,622 residents were identified from 151 programs. A total of 41% of the residents were reported as receiving compensation from the industry. The percent of residents reported from programs in less restrictive states was 45% versus 28% in more restrictive states (P < 0.001). Residents had a mean of 5.3 transactions per year in less restrictive states and 2.4 transactions per year in more restrictive states (P < 0.001). The mean compensation per resident reported was $2,730 for less restrictive sates versus $1,937 for more restrictive states (P < 0.001). DISCUSSION Overall, 41% of orthopaedic residents were reported on the CMS Open Payments Database with fewer transactions and less compensation going to residents in states with more restrictive legislature. Potential implications on resident education remain unknown.

Background Floating shoulder is an uncommon injury characterized by fractures of the clavicle and ipsilateral scapular neck. No consensus exists on management. The purpose of this study was to analyze the existing literature on treatment and clinical outcomes of floating shoulder injuries to provide a baseline understanding of current treatment strategies of this injury. Methods A systematic review was performed to identity published literature on outcomes and management of floating shoulder injuries. Searches were performed using PubMed, Embase, and SCOPUS. Results Seventeen studies were identified that included data for 371 shoulders. The mean reported age was 39.4 years (range, 16-82) and the mean follow-up was 49.4 months (range, 6-312). The major mechanism of injury was motor vehicle accident (51%) followed by fall from height (16%). Of the 371 shoulders, 215 (58%) were treated surgically, whereas 156 shoulders (42%) were managed nonoperatively. The most commonly reported outcome score was the Constant-Murley score (9 studies), followed by the Herscovici Floating Shoulder Injury score (5 studies). The mean Constant-Murley score was 80% of ideal maximum for both shoulders treated surgically and those treated nonoperatively. Conclusion Satisfactory outcomes can be expected following both surgical fixation and nonoperative management of floating shoulder injuries when appropriately individualized to the patient, as evidenced by clinical outcome scores. Floating shoulder injuries with significant displacement of the scapular neck may benefit from surgical fixation of both the clavicle and scapula fractures. In those with minimal or nondisplaced scapular neck fractures, good outcomes may be achieved when treated nonoperatively or with surgical fixation of the clavicle alone.

Background The cost of health care in the United States accounts for 18% of the nation's gross domestic product and is expected to reach 20% by 2020. Physicians are responsible for 60%-80% of decisions resulting in health care expenditures. Rotator cuff repairs account for $1.2-$1.6 billion in US health care expenditures annually. The purpose of this study is to assess surgeons' cost awareness in the setting of rotator cuff repairs. The hypothesis is that practice environment and training affect cost consciousness and incentivization will lead to more cost-effective choices. Methods In this cross-sectional study, a 21-item survey was distributed via the email list services of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Arthroscopy Association of North America. Data collected included demographics, variables regarding rotator cuff repair (technique, number of companies used, procedures per month), and knowledge of costs. Results Responses from 345 surgeons in 23 countries were obtained with the majority (89%) being from the United States. Most surgeons were “cost-conscious” (275, 70.7%). Of these surgeons, 62.9% are willing to switch suture anchors brands to reduce overall costs if incentivized. Cost-conscious surgeons were more likely to be fellowship trained in shoulder and elbow (51.81% vs. 38.57%, P = .048), be paid based on productivity (73.53% vs. 61.43%, P = .047), and receive shared profits (85.4% vs. 75%, P = .02). Conclusion The majority of orthopedic surgeons are both cost-conscious and willing to change their practice to reduce costs if incentivized to do so. A better understanding of implant costs combined with incentives may help reduce health care expenditure.

OBJECTIVES Check-in kiosks are increasingly used in health care. This project aims to assess the effects of kiosk use upon check-in duration, point of service (POS) financial returns, and patient satisfaction. METHODS Six kiosks were implemented in a large academic orthopedic clinic, and check-in duration for 8.5 months following implementation and POS returns for 10.5 months before and after implementation were analyzed. Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group survey and self-devised surveys recorded patient satisfaction. RESULTS Cumulatively, 28,636 kiosk-based patient encounters were analyzed. Compared with historical norms, check-in duration decreased 2 minutes, 47 seconds (P < 0.001). Daily gross and individual POS returns increased $532.13 and $1.89, respectively (P < 0.001). Satisfaction surveys were completed by 719 of 1376 consecutive patients (52% response rate), revealing 12% improvement (P < 0.001), but Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group survey responses demonstrated no change (P = 0.146, 0.928, and 0.336). CONCLUSIONS Kiosks offer to reduce check-in duration and increase POS revenue without negatively affecting patient satisfaction.

Background The literature is unclear as to the optimal surgical management of a symptomatic os acromiale that has failed nonoperative treatment. Surgical options include excision, acromioplasty, and open reduction and internal fixation. The purpose of this study is to summarize the described methods and compare their reported outcomes with the goal to provide direction on how to surgically manage os acromiale. Methods We performed a systematic review of the current medical literature. Fifteen studies met all the inclusion criteria. Two hundred eleven total subjects (220 shoulders) underwent surgical treatment for a symptomatic os acromiale. There were 140 men and 71 women with a mean age of 49.6 ± 9.1 years. The mean follow-up duration was 40 ± 11.6 months. Surgical techniques used in the included studies were excision, acromioplasty, and open reduction with internal fixation. Concurrent surgical procedures performed were also included. Results Meso-os acromiale was the most common type (167 cases, 94.4%). The most common surgical technique was internal fixation (135 cases, 60.8%), with screw fixation being the majority (76 cases, 56.3%). Excision (65 cases, 29.3%) was the second most used technique. The most common concurrent surgical procedure performed was rotator cuff repair (125 cases, 56.3%), followed by distal clavicle excision (31 cases, 14%). Conclusions All surgical techniques employed resulted in improvement in postsurgical clinical outcomes without any technique demonstrating superior results. Operative management of a symptomatic os acromiale that has failed initial nonoperative treatment leads to decreased symptoms and improvement in clinical outcomes.

Milestones specific to orthopaedic surgical training document individual resident progress through skill development in multiple dimensions. Residents increasingly interact with and are assessed by surgeons in both academic and private practice environments. Milestones describe the skills that support competence. One of the primary goals of milestones is to provide continuous data for educational quality improvement of residency programs. They provide a dialogue between surgeons who supervise residents or fellows and the program's Clinical Competency Committee throughout a resident's education. The orthopaedic milestones were developed jointly by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery. The working team was designed with broad representation within the specialty. The milestones were introduced to orthopaedic residencies in 2013. Orthopaedics is a 5-year training program; the first comprehensive longitudinal data set is now available for study. This summary provides historical perspective on the development of the milestones, state of current milestone implementation, attempts to establish validity, challenges with the milestones, and the development of next-generation assessment tools.

Financial literacy is the individual ability and skill to make informed decisions in the management of resources within the financial marketplace to yield a lifetime of financial well-being. Residents across several subspecialties have demonstrated low levels of financial literacy, and it is thought that more financial education is needed during residency training. The purpose of this study is to perform a comprehensive evaluation on financial literacy and financial attitudes of orthopaedic surgery residents. The authors hypothesize that orthopaedic residents will have low levels of financial literacy and financial satisfaction.A 46-question anonymous survey was administered through COERG (Collaborative Orthopaedic Educational Research Group) to 1028 orthopaedic surgery residents of all postgraduate year at 43 programs with broad national distribution. Resident demographics and survey responses regarding knowledge of finance and investment topics, application of financial principles, and personal financial status were compared.The survey response rate was 48% (494/1028). The average financial literacy score of all orthopaedic resident participants was 60.9% (±16.5%). A total of 35.5% of orthopaedic residents were satisfied with their current financial situation. Saving for retirement and lower loan burdens correlated with greater financial satisfaction in financial situation. Scores were higher in orthopaedic residents with greater childhood annual household income, no credit card debt, higher levels of parent education, and active retirement savings plans.Orthopaedic residents show significant deficits in overall financial and investment knowledge combined with a dissatisfaction with financial situations while in residency. Orthopaedic residency programs have the opportunity to implement program-sponsored training and financial resources to enhance the resident education experience.

Introduction: Osteoporosis is a critical public health issue with substantial morbidity and healthcare costs. Resident education on osteoporosis is not standardized. Little is known about the barriers to osteoporosis treatment and the usefulness of educational programming from the perspective of orthopaedic residency program directors (PDs). Methods: This study aims to evaluate the current state and perception of bone health education from the perspective of orthopaedic residency PDs. Therefore, a self-designed 29-question online survey was sent to 129 PDs in the United States to assess bone health education. The information, collected from August to October 2020, included program characteristics, participation in the American Orthopaedic Association’s Own the Bone (AOA/OTB) program or any fracture liaison service (FLS) program, availability of faculty, potential barriers, and educational resources. Data collection was performed anonymously with a 47% response rate. Results: The results were compared between programs that used the AOA/OTB program (30%) or any FLS program (28%) (58% OTB or any FLS) vs. programs that did not have any program (42%). Subsequent subanalysis was performed comparing AOA/OTB vs. any FLS vs. no program. Programs that did not have any FLS were least likely to have a formal education syllabus (p = 0.01). When comparing clinical education of residents on bone health, 64% of programs without any system did not provide any formal clinical exposure such as a bone health clinic vs. assessment in patients with fracture compared with 24% of OTB programs and 44% of programs with any FLS (p = 0.02). When asked about desired resources, 47% would find a bone health rotation useful. Among all PDs, 60% support the concept of a 5-year AOA Council of Orthopaedic Residency Directors (CORD)/OTB osteoporosis curriculum. Discussion: The key findings were that institutions including OTB or any FLS in their programs had better availability of specialty consultants, faculty, and a FLS coordinator.

Systems review and quality improvement (QI) is a significant need within orthopaedic surgery. The focus of this paper is to systematically review QI principles utilized in total joint arthroplasty to determine most successful QI tools. A systematic search on MEDLINE/Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and other sources was conducted from September 1991 through October 2018. The three primary improved outcomes from each article were recorded along with the date, author and subspecialty. Thirty-four eligible studies related to joint arthroplasty were identified for inclusion in the systematic review. The most common outcomes that were improved in these publications were: length of stay (LOS), cost, medication management, and patient education. Lean, clinical care pathways (CCP), plan-do-check-act (PDCA), and shared decision-making improved those metrics. Four metrics were found that were consistently improved by certain quality improvement tools: LOS, cost, medication management, and patient education. Further research is warranted to continue to build a framework for quality improvement in orthopaedic surgery. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 30(3):125-130, 2021).