Search

Introduction Previous research has shown that patients from historically marginalized groups in the United States tend to have poorer outcomes after joint replacement surgery and that they are less likely to receive joint replacement surgery at high-volume hospitals. However, little is known regarding how this group of patients chooses their joint replacement surgeon. The purpose of this study was to understand the factors influencing the choice of joint replacement surgeon amongst a diverse group of patients. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with Medicare patients who underwent a hip or knee replacement within the last 24 months (N = 38) at an academic and community hospital. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and verified for accuracy. Transcripts were reviewed using iterative content analysis to extract key themes related to how respondents chose their joint replacement surgeon. Results and discussion MD referral/recommendation appears to be the strongest factor influencing joint replacement surgeon choice. Other key considerations are hospital reputation and surgeon attributes—including operative experience, communication skills, and participation in shared decision-making. Gender/ethnicity of a surgeon, industry payments to surgeons, number of publications and cost did not play a large role in surgeon choice. Conclusion and clinical relevance The process of choosing a joint replacement surgeon is a complex decision-making process with several factors at play. Despite growing availability of information regarding surgeons, patients largely relied on referrals for choosing their joint replacement surgeon regardless of ethnicity. Referring physicians need to ensure that patients are able to access hospital and surgeon outcomes, operative volume, and industry-payment information to learn more about their orthopedic surgeons in order to make an informed choice.

The goal of this study was to define safe zones to prevent radial nerve injury in an extended deltopectoral approach. Relative distances of the upper margin (UMRN) and lower margin (LMRN) of the radial nerve to the proximal and distal borders of the pectoralis major and deltoid insertions were measured in 20 cadaveric arms. Four proximal humeral zones were identified (zone I, proximal border of the pectoralis major tendon to the proximal border of the deltoid tendon; zone II, proximal border of the deltoid tendon to the distal border of the pectoralis major tendon; zone III, distal border of the pectoralis major tendon to the distal border of the deltoid tendon; and zone IV, distal to the distal border of the deltoid tendon). On fluoroscopic measurement, mean distances between the UMRN and the proximal border of the pectoralis major tendon and the proximal border of the deltoid tendon were 71.6±2.1 mm and 26.2±2.5 mm, respectively. The incidence of the radial nerve in the spiral groove within each defined zone was as follows: zone I, 0%; zone II, 50%; zones III and IV, 100%. There was a significant association between anatomic zone and radial nerve entry into the spiral groove, χ 2 (3, N=88)=64.53, P Orthopedics . 2023;46(1):e31–e37.]

Background:Postoperative blood product transfusions in elderly hip fracture patients cause concern for morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors and short-term sequelae of postoperative transfusion following geriatric hip fracture surgery.Methods:We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) to identify geriatric (⩾65 years) patients who sustained operative femoral neck, intertrochanteric, and subtrochanteric hip fractures in 2016. Multivariate regression was used to determine risk-adjusted odds ratios (OR) of associated perioperative risk factors and sequelae of postoperative transfusion.Results:In total, 8416 geriatric hip fracture patients were identified of whom 28.3% had documented postoperative transfusion. In multivariate analysis, age (OR 1.03 [1.02–1.04], p Conclusions:Postoperative transfusion is a common occurrence in geriatric fragility hip fractures with multiple risk factors. Careful preoperative planning and multidisciplinary management efforts are warranted to reduce use of postoperative transfusions.

Among surgical patients, utilization of institutional-based postacute care (PAC) presents a notable financial burden and is associated with increased risk of complications and mortality rates when compared with discharge home. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of postdischarge disposition to PAC in geriatric patients after surgical fixation of native hip fractures.We have done a query of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program to identify geriatric (≥65 years) patients who sustained surgical femoral neck, intertrochanteric, and subtrochanteric hip fractures in 2016. Multivariate regression was used to compute risk factors for discharge to and prolonged stay (30 days) in PAC.Eight thousand one hundred thirty-three geriatric hip fracture patients with sufficient follow-up data were identified. Of these, 6,670 patients (82.0%) were initially discharged to PAC after their hip fracture episode of care, and 2,986 patients (36.7%) remained in PAC for30 days. Age (odds ratio [OR] 1.06 [1.05 to 1.08], P0.001), partial (OR 2.41 [1.57 to 3.71], P0.001) or total dependence (OR 3.03 [1.92 to 4.46], P0.001) for activities of daily living, dementia (OR 1.62 [1.33 to 1.96], P0.001), diabetes (OR 1.46 [1.14 to 1.85], P = 0.002), hypertension (OR 1.32 [1.10 to 1.58], P = 0.002), and total hospital length of stay (OR 1.04 [1.01 to 1.08], P = 0.006) were independent risk factors for discharge to PAC. Age (OR 1.05 [1.04 to 1.06], P0.001), partial (OR 2.86 [1.93 to 3.79], P0.001) or total dependence (OR 3.12 [1.45 to 4.79], P0.001) for activities of daily living, American Society of Anesthesiologist's classification (OR 1.27 [1.13 to 1.43], P0.001), dementia (OR 1.49 [1.28 to 1.74], P0.001), and total hospital length of stay (OR 1.10 [1.08 to 1.13], P0.001) were independent risk factors for prolonged PAC stay30 days.Discharge to PAC is the norm among patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Provider foreknowledge of risk factors may help improve hip fracture outcomes and decrease healthcare costs.

Purpose To appraise the available animal and human studies investigating low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation (LIPUS) on tendon, ligament, and bone–soft tissue (B-ST) junction healing. Methods A systematic review of PUBMED, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed for animal and human studies investigating the effects of LIPUS on tendon, ligament, and B-ST junction healing. The systematic search was performed using the key term “low intensity pulsed ultrasound” and any of the following: “tendon,” “ligament,” “tendon-bone,” and “bone-tendon.” Inclusion criteria consisted of (1) randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of LIPUS on bone, tendon, and soft tissue in animals or humans and (2) English-language articles. Results A total of 28 animal and 2 human studies met inclusion criteria. Animal studies utilized various models, including Achilles and patellar tendon transections, medial collateral ligament transections, and surgical repair of patellar tendon, rotator cuff tendon, and anterior cruciate ligament, to evaluate the effects of LIPUS. Animal studies demonstrated significantly improved collagen content and organization, bone formation, fibrocartilage remodeling, and mechanical strength with LIPUS treatment compared with controls. In human trials, LIPUS treatment of chronic tendinopathies did not improve clinical outcomes. Conclusions In acute injury animal models, LIPUS augmented healing of acute tendon, ligament, and B-ST junction injuries through increased collagen content and organization; increased anti-inflammatory cellular signaling; and increased angiogenesis. However, in 2 human studies investigating chronic tendinopathy, LIPUS did not lead to superior outcomes compared with controls. Clinical Relevance Animal models suggest that LIPUS may be a promising noninvasive treatment modality for accelerating patient recovery after acute tendon and ligament injuries, as well as after surgical repair of B-ST junction injuries, but this has not been demonstrated in human studies. Randomized clinical trials evaluating LIPUS for acute tendon and ligament injuries are warranted.