Search

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has raised unprecedented challenges in the management of patients with cancer and has increased the demands for digital health tools that, for example, could facilitate remote monitoring of patients. Based on this, the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell’Adulto (GIMEMA) has recently developed a digital health tool dedicated to patients with hematologic malignancies: the GIMEMA-ALLIANCE platform. ObjectiveThe main objectives of this web-based platform are to generate relevant data to better understand quality of life, symptoms, and medication adherence during the COVID-19 pandemic and postpandemic era; to develop a prospective real-life registry on outcomes of patients with hematologic cancer, with or without a diagnosis of COVID-19; and to facilitate patient-centered care in routine practice. MethodsThe platform consists of physician- and patient-secure portals and enables electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) assessments with real-time graphical presentation to physicians of individual patient symptoms and quality-of-life outcomes. Automated alerts are sent to treating hematologists based on the following predetermined criteria: presence of clinically important problems and symptoms, problems with adherence to therapy, and risk of COVID-19 diagnosis. The platform also allows physicians to set up video consultations. Clinical information regarding disease and treatment as well as clinical and survival outcomes are also prospectively collected. ResultsRecruitment of participants started in December 2020. As of April 2021, a total of 116 patients have been enrolled in this study. Use of this platform may help to improve patient-physician communication and help hematologists in the early recognition of clinically important problems and symptoms of their patients. More than 20 community and university-based hospitals have currently agreed to participate. In addition to patient-reported outcome data, the prospective collection of disease- and treatment-related information, as well as data on possible COVID-19 diagnosis and COVID-19 vaccination, will allow the development of a large database to also identify subgroups of patients at risk of poor outcomes. ConclusionsData generated via this platform will help to answer clinically relevant questions for patients with hematologic malignancies during the COVID-19 pandemic and postpandemic era. The use of the GIMEMA-ALLIANCE platform in routine practice may also contribute to enhancing patient-centered care. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04581187; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04581187 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)PRR1-10.2196/25271

Background/Objectives: Chemical and carcinogenic risk in workplace are linked to an increase of the incidence of cancer in exposed workers. The aim of this observational study was to identify an association between exposure to chemical risk and changes in hematochemical parameters of workers exposed. Methods: The study examined blood count parameters performed on 4523 employees of Sapienza University of Rome from September 2019 to February 2020. A total of 1402 workers in research laboratories, exposed to chemical risk and carcinogens, was compared with a cohort of 3121 blood donors, in apparently good health, matched for age, sex, and period of blood collection. Results: Multivariate analysis demonstrated acrylamide is the most frequently associated chemical with significant changes between the groups. It is related to an increase in monocytes and MPV, a reduction of lymphocytes, platelets, and red series values, while MCH remained unchanged. Formaldehyde reveals the same changes as acrylamide, with the exception of the percentage of lymphocytes, red blood cells, and HB, which remain unchanged. Other chemicals and carcinogens show variations for few blood count parameters. Conclusions: The present study found out a significant change in blood count values in workers exposed to acrylamide and formaldehyde. It also showed an increase in the mean monocyte value in employees exposed to carcinogenic risk, compared to non-exposed, with the exception of Trypan Blue. The implementation of efficient health surveillance remains of critical importance. These data should be compared with those from follow-up studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary Ruxolitinib is a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF)‐related splenomegaly or symptoms. The recommended starting dose depends on platelet count, regardless of haemoglobin level at baseline. In the recent years, an overall survival (OS) advantage was reported in patients treated with ruxolitinib compared with best available therapy. We analysed a large Italian cohort of 3494 patients identified by Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA) monitoring registries. Of them, 2337 (66.9%) started at reduced dose: these patients were older (median age 70 vs. 67), with increased incidence of large splenomegaly (longitudinal diameter 20 vs. 19.1 cm, median volume 1064 cm3 vs. 1016 cm3), with higher IPSS risk (30.9% vs. 26.1%), and worse ECOG score (more than 1 in 14.3% vs. 9.8%). After balancing for baseline characteristics, Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a median OS of 78.2 months (95% CI 65.9–89) for patients who started at full dose and 52.6 (95% CI 49–56.6) months for patients who started with reduced dose (p < 0.001). Group analysis also showed a substantial difference in patients with intermediate‐2 and high IPSS risk. The majority of MF patients in real‐world analysis started with a reduced dose of ruxolitinib, which is associated with less favourable outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Relapses of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) remain a challenge despite the introduction of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO). Given the variability in salvage therapies and emerging evidence supporting the deferral of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in patients receiving ATO, we analyzed the outcomes of a multicentric cohort of 67 relapsed APL patients. Better outcomes were reported with ATO ± ATRA compared to chemo-based regimens and ATRA ± Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO). A significant survival advantage was observed for patients undergoing HCT in the chemo-based cohort (p = 0.017), but not in the ATO-based group (p = 0.12). Achieving molecular complete remission (CR) post salvage therapy emerged as the main prognostic factor for second relapses in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Our findings support the efficacy of ATO-based therapies in first relapse and enhance the role of molecular remission as an independent outcome predictor in both first and second APL relapses. Background: The introduction of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) has radically improved the prognosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), with cure rates above 80%. While relapse occurs in less than 20% of cases, addressing this issue remains challenging. Identifying effective salvage therapies for relapsed APL is crucial to improve patient outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on a multicentric cohort of 67 APL patients in first relapse, treated in three Italian hematology centers from June 1981 to November 2021. The overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) were calculated, and predictive factors were assessed using Cox regression models. Results: Overall, 61 patients (91%) received ATO ± ATRA (40.3%), chemo-based regimens (40.3%), or ATRA ± Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) (10.4%). Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 98.2% of patients (molecular CR, n = 71.4%). With a median follow-up time of 54.5 months, the 5-year OS was 73% in the ATO ± ATRA group, 44% in the chemo-based group, and 29% in the ATRA ± GO group (p = 0.035). The 5-year OS rate was also higher for transplant recipients vs. non-recipients within the chemo-based cohort (50% vs. 33%, p = 0.017), but not in the ATO-based cohort (p = 0.12). ATO-based salvage therapy resulted in better OS in both univariate (p = 0.025) and multivariate analyses (p = 0.026). The 2-year CIR was higher in patients without molecular CR vs. patients in molecular CR (66% vs. 24%, p = 0.034). Molecular CR was a significant predictor of second relapse in both univariate (p = 0.035) and multivariate analyses (p = 0.036). Conclusions: Our findings support the efficacy of ATO-based therapies in first relapse of APL and confirm the achievement of molecular remission as an independent outcome predictor in both first and second APL relapse. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: FLT3 mutations are common in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and are often associated with poorer outcomes and higher relapse rates. This study examined the long-term outcomes of FLT3-mutated (FLT3m) AML patients who received intensive treatment at our institution over the past 24 years, comparing the results in patients who received standard chemotherapy alone with those who received a FLT3 inhibitor (FLT3i). Our single-center, real-life experience confirms the impact of FLT3i administration on survival, both in frontline and salvage settings. In addition, our results underline that the proper positioning of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in the therapeutic algorithm is still an unmet need. These findings suggest that incorporating FLT3-targeting agents into treatment plans may improve outcomes for AML patients while highlighting the need for the continued optimization of treatment strategies to enhance patient survival and quality of life. We analyzed 140 patients with a median age of 51 years; 21% had WBC ≥ 100 × 109/L, and 52% had an NPM1 co-mutation. Until 2018, 101 patients received chemotherapy; thereafter, 39 received 3+7+midostaurin. The overall CR rate was 64%, higher in NPM1 mutant patients (73%). Univariate analysis showed that NPM1 mutation (p = 0.032) and WBC < 100 × 109/L (p = 0.013) positively influenced the response, with a trend for FLT3i administration (p = 0.052). Multivariate analysis confirmed WBC count as an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.017). In CR1, 41/90 patients underwent allogeneic and 18 autologous transplantation. The median EFS was 1.1 vs. 1.6 years in autografted and allografted patients, respectively (p = 0.9). The one-year non-relapse mortality was 0.00% for autologous and 28% for allogeneic transplants (p = 0.007); CIR at 1 and 3 years was higher in autologous transplants (39% vs. 15% and 57% vs. 21%, p = 0.004). The median survival was not reached in the FLT3i group. Overall, 69 patients received stem cell transplantation (18 autologous, 51 allogeneic). Post-transplant FLT3i was resumed in eight patients, all alive after a median of 65 months. Allogeneic transplantation is crucial in FLT3-mutated AML, but the next challenge will be to identify which patients can benefit from transplants in CR1 and in which to intensify post-transplant therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal disorder of hematopoietic stem cells characterized by altered bone marrow function and fibrosis. The aim of this narrative review is to report on the most recent epidemiologic data and to discuss features of MF and current strategies for the management of this condition in clinical practice. MF features covered by our review will include: characteristics of patients with MF; myeloproliferative and myelodepletive phenotypes; MF-associated thrombosis and bleeding; risk of infections; prefibrotic and overt PMF; secondary MF. Finally, we will discuss a few aspects of MF management in clinical practice and suggest strategies for its optimization and standardization. The focus of our paper is on Italy, but relevant data from other countries will also be reviewed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal Philadelphia chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (Ph‐MPN). MF is featured by an inflammatory condition that can also drive the progression of disease. Ruxolitinib (ruxo) is the‐first‐in‐class Jak1/2 inhibitor approved for treatment of MF, proved to reduce spleen volume and decrease symptom burden. In various malignancies neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been indicated as predictor of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). NLR might reflect the balance between systemic inflammation and immunity and is emerging as a prognostic biomarker in several neoplasms, including the hematological ones. Methods: We analyzed a cohort of 140 MF patients treated with ruxo to validate baseline NLR (as a continuous variable and as a cut‐off 2) as predictor of OS and of ruxo treatment discontinuation. Results: We found that both baseline NLR as a continuous variable [HR 0.8 (95% CI: 0.7–0.9) (p =.006)] and NLR (<2 vs. ≥2) [HR 3.4 (95% CI: 1.6–7.0) (p =.001)] were significantly associated with OS. Censoring for patients undergone allotransplant, baseline NLR <2 was predictive of an earlier ruxo any‐other‐cause discontinuation [HR 3.7 (95%CI 1.7–8.3) (p <.001)]. Conclusions: NLR before starting ruxo treatment may be used as a simple and early predictor of OS and earlier ruxo discontinuation in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]