Search

The diagnostic value of sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) is controversial. Prognostic factors for CRC must be detected to improve its treatment. A PubMed query (key words: colorectal cancer, sentinel node) provided 182 studies on the sentinel lymph node (SLN) for CRC, the abstracts of which were reviewed. Altogether, 48 studies dealing with the diagnostic value of SLNM were selected from PubMed, and 6 other studies were retrieved from reviews. We compared the diagnostic value of SLNM with that of conventional histopathologic examination. We used the diagnostic accuracy odds ratio (DAOR) method. Because of significant heterogeneity, we chose the random effect model (Der Simonian and Laird). Statistics were performed on 33 studies, including 1794 patients (1201 colon and 332 rectum cancers). The mean SLNM failure rate was 10%. The global sensitivity and specificity of the SLNM were, respectively, 70% and 81%. The pooled DAOR was 10.7 (95% confidence interval 7.0–16.5). That means that a patient whose SLN is invaded has 10.7 times more risk to be node-positive than an SLN-negative patient. Lymphatic mapping appears to be readily applicable to CRC. One of the main reasons for the heterogeneity is the performance of the SLNM by Saha et al., whose data had better sensitivity (90%) than those in other studies. The SLNM technique should be better standardized in future studies. Understanding the cause of false-negative SLNs (9%) is a major issue to resolve before routinely using this technique in CRC management. The prognostic implication of micrometastases found in SLNs requires further evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Objectives: Intrapleural immunotherapy has shown some activity in patients with malignant mesothelioma. We conducted a multicentric pilot phase II study to evaluate the tolerance and the activity of intrapleurally infused autologous human activated macrophages (AM Phi) in patients with stage IA, IB, and IIA malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).Design: AM Phi derived from in vitro monocyte culture were infused into the pleura of patients every week for 8 consecutive weeks. Each infusion was followed 3 days later by an intrapleural injection of 9 millions units of gamma-interferon (gamma-IFN) in an attempt to prolong the in vivo activation of infused AM Phi. Response was assessed by CT scan and thoracoscopy when possible. If the patient's disease progressed after AM Phi treatment, an additional treatment was left to the choice of the investigator.Patients: Nineteen patients with histologically proven stage IA, IB, or IIA MPM were enrolled. Two patients were excluded before any AM Phi infusion because of complications impeding infusion. Seventeen patients were actually treated. After completion of the AM Phi cellular therapy, 10 patients were treated with chemotherapy as their diseases progressed.Results: The overall response rate of patients actually treated was 14%. When including the two patients enrolled but not treated, the overall response "in intention to treat" was 11%; two patients had a partial response, with a duration of response of 30 months and 3 months, respectively. One patient, who could not be evaluated by thoracoscopy because of pleural symphysis, is still alive without any clinical or radiologic sign of disease 69 months after treatment. No major adverse effects were observed during the infusion of either AM Phi or gamma-IFN, and there was no interruption of treatment because of toxicity. However, symphysis was observed in 7 of 14 patients who received the complete treatment. The median survival of patients actually treated, including those who received chemotherapy after AM Phi, was 29.2 months.Conclusion: Combined infusion of AM Phi and gamma-IFN was well tolerated in patients with MPM; however, it had limited antitumor activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since 10 years, high-dose chemotherapy has been evaluated for the treatment of breast cancer in numerous randomized clinical trials. Preliminary results of some of these studies have shown an advantage in relapse-free survival in both metastatic and high-risk breast cancer. Although follow-up is short in most of the studies, no impact on overall survival has been detected. Based on available results, high-dose chemotherapy cannot be proposed either in metastatic or in high-risk breast cancer patients outside a clinical trial. Conversely, two randomized trials have demonstrated that dose-dense scheduled chemotherapy with G-CSF support, containing an anthracycline, cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel, improves clinical outcomes compared with the same regimen administered every 3 weeks. These results establish dose-dense scheduled chemotherapy containing an anthracycline and paclitaxel as an option for the adjuvant treatment of positive lymph nodes breast cancer patients. Data are not sufficient to conclude in the neoadjuvant and metastatic setting. High-dose chemotherapy and dose-dense chemotherapy seem to increase the pathological complete response rate in inflammatory breast cancer. However, prospective and comparative survival data are lacking.

Many others cancer agents can lead to cardiovascular toxicity apart from anthracyclines, 5-fluorouracil, trastuzumab and ionizing radiations. Paclitaxel, high-dose cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide, mitomycin and irinotecan cardiotoxicity is unusual but for certain. Hormonal therapy is extensively used in breast and prostate cancers. Thromboembolic and cardiovascular events are increased by estrogens, synthetic progestatives and tamoxifene. Because of major toxicities related to intravenous interleukin-2, subcutaneous interleukin-2 regimens have been developed, allowing an improvement of cardiovascular tolerability. Interferon is less frequently associated with cardiotoxicity. Before treatment initiation, risk factors favouring cardiac toxicity should be evaluated. These risk factors can be related to the cancer agent, to the patient or to the tumour. Uncommon toxic events in general population can be more frequent in high risk patients. Therapeutic option can be influenced by these uncommon toxic events in high risk patients.

In 1961, Stauffer first described a syndrome characterized by nonmetastatic intrahepatic cholestasis associated with undifferentiated renal adenocarcinoma. Since that time, this syndrome has been associated with other tumor diseases. We describe here a patient with lung adenocarcinoma which led to paraneoplastic cholestasis. We discuss the diagnosis and review the literature, emphasizing the pathophysiology of Stauffer's syndrome.

Context: Surgery remains the standard treatment of rectal cancer. The risk of local recurrence is still a serious problem with an incidence of between 15 and 45%. This depends on the initial TNM stage and the surgical technique. In order to optimally improve local control and survival of the patients, radiotherapy has become an unavoidable adjuvant treatment in specific situations., Isolated Radiotherapy: For locally advanced cancers (T3 or T4), pre-surgical radiotherapy followed by curative surgery is the standard treatment because of the improvement in global survival and good local control that has recently been confirmed. With radiotherapy it is also possible to schedule conservative sphincter surgery in the case of low rectal lesions and permit surgery of initially inoperable lesions. THE CONCOMITANT ASSOCIATION OF RADIOTHERAPY AND CHEMOTHERAPY DURING THE PRE-SURGICAL PERIOD: In rare cases in which the tumour stage was underestimated in the pre-surgical controls, post-surgical concomitant radio-chemotherapy is required. In cases in which surgery was performed first line, in the presence of histological factors of poor prognosis, post-surgical radio-chemotherapy is warranted. In the United States, the reference chemotherapy used in this association is 5 FU in continuous intravenous infusion. In the rare cases of contraindication for surgery, exclusive concomitant radio-chemotherapy is an appropriate solution, even if no treatment has been validated in this indication. Palliative surgery can be proposed in supplement: usually a colostomy or, more rarely excision using the endorectal route., Medical Treatment: Exclusive radio-chemotherapy has only demonstrated interest in the palliative treatment of inoperable loco-regional relapses that have already undergone radiation or in metastatic stages as in colon cancers. Currently post-surgical chemotherapy is recommended in stage III cancer of the rectum as in colon cancers at the same stage.