Search

Extensive evidence underscores the pivotal role of socioeconomic status (SES) in shaping cancer-related outcomes. However, synthesizing definitive and actionable insights from the expansive body of literature remains a significant challenge. To elucidate the associations between SES, cancer outcomes, and the overall cancer burden, we conducted a comprehensive burden estimation coupled with an umbrella review of relevant meta-analyses. Our findings reveal that robust or highly suggestive meta-analytic evidence supports only a limited number of these associations. Individuals with lower SES, compared to those with higher SES, are disproportionately disadvantaged by reduced access to immunotherapy, KRAS testing for colorectal cancer, targeted cancer therapies, and precision treatments for melanoma. Additionally, they exhibit lower rates of breast cancer screening and higher incidence rates of lung cancer. Furthermore, countries with a higher Human Development Index demonstrate a substantially greater burden related cancer incidence, with this disparity being more pronounced among men than women., Competing Interests: Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Growing epidemiological evidence suggests an association between exposure to air pollutants and breast cancer. Yet, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. This study explored the mediating role of thirteen metabolic health biomarkers in the relationship between exposure to three air pollutants, i.e. nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ), polychlorinated biphenyls 153 (PCB153), and benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), and breast cancer risk., Methods: We used data from a nested case-control study within the French national prospective E3N-Generations cohort, involving 523 breast cancer cases and 523 matched controls. The four-way decomposition mediation of total effects for thirteen biomarkers was applied to estimate interaction and mediation effects (controlled direct, reference interaction, mediated interaction, and pure indirect effects)., Results: The analyses indicated a significant increase in breast cancer risk associated with BaP exposure (odds ratio (OR) Q4 vs Q1  = 2.32, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.00-5.37). PCB153 exposure showed a positive association only in the third quartile (OR Q3 vs Q1  = 2.25, CI 1.13-4.57), but it appeared to be non-significant in the highest quartile (OR Q4 vs Q1  = 2.07, CI 0.93-4.61). No association was observed between NO 2 exposure and breast cancer risk. Estradiol was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer (OR per one standard deviation (SD) increment = 1.22, CI 1.05-1.42), while thyroid-stimulating hormone was inversely related to breast cancer risk (OR per 1SD increase = 0.87, CI 0.75-1.00). We observed a suggestive mediated effect of the association between the three pollutants and breast cancer risk, through albumin, high-density lipoproteins cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, parathormone, and estradiol., Conclusion: Although limited by a lack of statistical power, this study provides relevant insights into the potential mediating role of certain biomarkers in the association between air pollutant exposure and breast cancer risk, highlighting the need for further in-depth studies in large populations., Competing Interests: Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Our research utilized data from the existing French prospective cohort E3N. All participants provided informed consent and the study received approval from the French National Commission for Data Protection and Privacy (CNIL). Due to ethical considerations and the specific consent signed by the participants, the datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available, however, data can be obtained from the E3N-Generations team through the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: It has been suggested that the association between body mass index and breast cancer risk differs between Asian women and Western women. We aimed to assess the associations between body mass index and breast cancer incidence in East Asian women., Methods: Pooled analyses were performed using individual participant data of 319,189 women from 13 cohort studies in Japan, Korea, and China. Participants' height and weight were obtained by measurement or self-reports at cohort baseline. Breast cancer was defined as code C50.0-C50.9 according to the International Classification. Using a Cox proportional hazards model, hazard ratios of breast cancer were estimated for each body mass index category, with the reference group set as the group with a body mass index of 21 to < 23 kg/m 2 . The hazard ratio for a 5 kg/m 2 increase in body mass index was also calculated., Results: During a mean 16.6 years of follow-up, 4819 women developed breast cancer. Similar to Westerners, a steady increase in breast cancer risk with increasing body mass index was observed in postmenopausal women, but the slope of the risk increase appeared to slow at a body mass index of 26-28 kg/m 2 . In premenopausal women, the inverse association seen in Westerners was not observed. The risk of developing breast cancer after 50 years of age increased slightly with increasing body mass index, which was more pronounced in the older birth cohort. There was no significant association between body mass index and the risk of developing breast cancer before 50 years of age, but the risk estimates changed from positive to negative as the birth cohort got younger., Conclusions: In East Asia, the role of body mass index in breast cancer in premenopausal women may be changing along with the increase in obesity and breast cancer. The increased risk of postmenopausal breast cancer with a higher body mass index was as robust as that of Western women., Competing Interests: Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Each participating study was approved by the relevant institutional ethical review boards. The protocol for the ACC analysis was approved by the institutional review board of the National Cancer Center, Japan. The requirement for consent from several cohort studies was waived due to the justification for lack of consent at the time of the survey, the difficulty in obtaining new consent, and the public necessity of the research. Consent for publication All authors reviewed and approved the final version for submission. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer worldwide. Belgium shows high age-standardized incidence rates, but also high survival rates. Like many health outcomes, breast cancer has been associated with multiple factors of socioeconomic status. This paper aims to (a) map educational differences in breast cancer incidence, mortality and death rates within 5 years of diagnosis, (b) update earlier trends in breast cancer mortality rates in Belgium for the 2004-2013 period and (c) investigate the role of fertility indicators as mediating factors in the association between education and breast cancer outcomes., Methods: Data consisted of a linkage between the 2001 Belgian Census, register data on mortality and cancer incidence data (2004-2013) from the Belgian Cancer Registry. We calculated age standardized rates, rate ratios (Poisson regression) and hazard ratios (Cox regression) and furthermore also applied the method of Excess Portion Eliminated (EPE) in a mediation analysis of the fertility indicators. We stratified our analysis by age: younger than 50 (premenopausal) and 50 or older (postmenopausal)., Results: We observed striking differences in breast cancer incidence, all-cause and cause-specific death rates 5-years after diagnosis by educational level. Higher educated women had higher breast cancer incidence, but also lower all-cause and lower cause-specific death rates; adding up to zero differences in breast cancer mortality in the postmenopausal group and lower breast cancer mortality in the premenopausal group., Conclusion: A notable shift in the social gradient occurred since the 1990's, favouring higher-educated women in recent years. Especially, with regards to survival after diagnosis there is potential for policy intervention. Stage at diagnosis played a crucial role, but differences between socioeconomic groups remained significant after including this parameter. While fertility indicators played a role, the impact was less pronounced than expected., Competing Interests: Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Ethical Committee approval for this study is not required by law, since, (1) This study was performed within the legal framework of the Belgian Cancer Registry (BCR). Based on the Coordinated Law of 10 May 2015 (art. 138), BCR has a legal task to collect data on cancer, subject it to quality control, process and analyse it, encrypt and store it, report on it, make it accessible for research and protect it. Within the boundaries of this legal framework BCR is allowed to act without Ethical Committee approval; and (2) This retrospective study does not fall under the Belgian Law of 7 May 2004 regarding experiments on human persons (art. 3,§ 2) and is therefore not subject to Ethical Committee approval under this law either. BCR processes the data in accordance with GDPR and is exempt from the obligation to disclose information to the persons whose data are processed since notification to the data subject is impossible or takes disproportionate effort due to the large number of data subjects; in particular when data are processed for statistical purposes or for historical or scientific research (cfr. Art. 14.5, b. GDPR EU 2016/67). Consent for publication Not applicable. Only aggregated data and/or results are shown in this manuscript. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Breast cancer remains a significant public health issue, with delayed medical attention often leading to advanced stages and poorer survival rates. In East Africa, evidence on the prevalence and factors contributing to the delayed presentation of breast cancer is limited. As a result, this study aims to assess the pooled prevalence of delayed breast cancer presentation and identify contributing factors in East Africa., Methods: We conducted a systematic review of observational studies from East Africa using PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, Cochrane Library, Hinari, and Mednar databases. The Newcastle Ottawa 2016 Critical Appraisal Checklist assessed methodological quality. Publication bias was evaluated using a funnel plot and Egger's test, and heterogeneity was examined with the I-squared test. Data were extracted with Microsoft Excel and analyzed using Stata 11., Results: The pooled prevalence of delayed presentation among breast cancer patients in East Africa was 61.85% (95% Confidence Interval: 48.83%-74.88%). Significant factors contributing to delayed presentation included visiting traditional healers (Adjusted Odds Ratio: 3.52; 95% CI: 1.43-5.59), low educational levels (Adjusted Odds Ratio: 3.61; 95% CI: 2.39-4.82), age>40 years (Adjusted Odds Ratio 1.87; 1.03, 2.71), absence of breast pain (Adjusted Odds Ratio 2.42; 1.09, 3.74), distance >5km away from home to health institution (Adjusted Odds Ratio 2.89; 1.54, 4.24), and rural residence (Adjusted Odds Ratio: 3.33; 95% CI: 2.16-4.49)., Conclusion: This meta-analysis's findings demonstrated that over half of breast cancer patients in East Africa delayed detection. Significant factors associated with delayed presentation include age over 40 years, illiteracy, rural residence, use of traditional healers, distance greater than 5 km from a health facility, and absence of breast pain. Healthcare stakeholders and policymakers must be focused on raising awareness and educating people to encourage early detection and prompt therapy., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Mulugeta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Purpose: Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have shown similar diagnostic performance in detection of breast cancer. Limited CEM data are available for high-risk breast cancer screening. The purpose of the study was to prospectively investigate the efficacy of supplemental screening CEM in elevated risk patients., Materials and Methods: A prospective, single-institution, institutional review board-approved observational study was conducted in asymptomatic elevated risk women age 35 years or older who had a negative conventional two-dimensional digital breast tomosynthesis screening mammography (MG) and no additional supplemental screening within the prior 12 months., Results: Four hundred sixty women were enrolled from February 2019 to April 2021. The median age was 56.8 (range, 35.0-79.2) years; 408 of 460 (88.7%) were mammographically dense. Biopsy revealed benign changes in 22 women (22/37, 59%), high-risk lesions in four women (4/37, 11%), and breast cancer in 11 women (11/37, 30%). Fourteen cancers (10 invasive, tumor size range 4-15 mm, median 9 mm) were diagnosed in 11 women. The overall supplemental cancer detection rate was 23.9 per 1,000 patients, 95% CI (12.0 to 42.4). All cancers were grade 1 or 2, ER+ ERBB2-, and node negative. CEM imaging screening offered high specificity (0.875 [95% CI, 0.844 to 0.906]), high NPV (0.998 [95% CI, 0.993 to 1.000), moderate PPV1 (0.164 [95% CI, 0.076 to 0.253), moderate PPV3 (0.275 [95% CI, 0.137 to 0.413]), and high sensitivity (0.917 [95% CI, 0.760 to 1.000]). At least 1 year of imaging follow-up was available on all patients, and one interval cancer was detected on breast MRI 4 months after negative screening CEM., Conclusion: A pilot trial demonstrates a supplemental cancer detection rate of 23.9 per 1,000 in women at an elevated risk for breast cancer. Larger, multi-institutional, multiyear CEM trials in patients at elevated risk are needed for validation.

Gestational breast cancer (GBC), defined as breast cancer (BC) diagnosed during pregnancy or the first-year post-partum, accounts for 6-15% of BC cases in women aged 20-44 years. GBC has worse prognosis than non-GBC, but reasons behind are not clear. The GEICAM/2012-03 Study (Molecular Characterization of Gestational Breast Cancer) is a multicenter prospective/retrospective observational registry of patients diagnosed with GBC. From November 2014 to June 2015 seventy patients diagnosed with GBC were included in the study, 30 diagnosed during pregnancy and 40 after delivery. Our current study was aimed to explore differences in epidemiological, clinico-pathological and gene expression features of GBC tumors, from the GEICAM/2012-03 Study, compared to non-GBC tumors from patients of similar age (< 43 years) from six different GEICAM studies, used as non- GBC control population. As per the main objective, the study found multiple differences showing GBC tumors as a different biological entity. GBC showed a more aggressive biology, with higher Ki67 levels, higher incidence of breast and/or ovarian cancer family history, and germline deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations, and are enriched in basal-like intrinsic subtype. GBC patients showed a lower number of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, while specific genetic signatures highlight differences in GBC´s distinctive transcriptome. Our study shows that GBC is potentially a clinically and molecularly different entity, with specific epidemiological, clinical, and histological features, as well as a distinctive altered immune state and genetic signature. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to better understand the biology of GBC and to identify new targets against which develop new, more effective, targeted therapies., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background and Hypothesis: Breast cancer is more prevalent in women with severe mental illness than in the general population, and use of prolactin-increasing antipsychotics may be a contributing factor., Study Design: A nested case-control study was conducted using the Swedish nationwide registers (inpatient/outpatient care, sickness absence, disability pension, prescribed drugs, cancers). All women aged 18-85 years with schizophrenia/schizoaffective/other nonaffective psychotic disorder/bipolar disorder and breast cancer (cases) were matched for age, primary psychiatric diagnosis, and disease duration with five women without cancer (controls). The association between cumulative exposure to prolactin-increasing/prolactin-sparing antipsychotics and breast cancer was analyzed using conditional logistic regression, adjusted for comorbidities and co-medications., Study Results: Among 132 061 women, 1642 (1.24%) developed breast cancer between 2010 and 2021, at a mean age of 63.3 ± 11.8 years. Compared with 8173 matched controls, the odds of breast cancer increased in women with prior exposure to prolactin-increasing antipsychotics for 1-4 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-1.41), and for ≥ 5 years (aOR = 1.47, 95%CI = 1.26-1.71). There were no increased or decreased odds of breast cancer with exposure to prolactin-sparing antipsychotics of either 1-4 years (aOR = 1.17, 95%CI = 0.98-1.40) or ≥5 years (aOR = 0.99, 95%CI = 0.78-1.26). The results were consistent across all sensitivity analyses (ie, according to different age groups, cancer types, and primary psychiatric diagnosis)., Conclusions: Although causality remains uncertain, exposure to prolactin-elevating antipsychotics for ≥ 1 year was associated with increased odds of breast cancer in women with severe mental illness. When prescribing antipsychotics, a shared decision-making process should consider individual risk factors for breast cancer., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center.)

Breast and gynecological cancers are common cancers with high mortality and have profound effects on the various physical functions of women. This study assessed trends in the number of hospitalizations, in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and hospital charges for female breast and gynecological cancer from 2004 to 2020. The data for this study come from the China Health Statistics Yearbook. Time trends of categorical variables were assessed with the Cochran-Armitage Test. The linear model was used to test for the trend of continuous variables. The hospitalizations for breast cancer increased from 15,204 to 276,387 (P for trend < 0.001) and gynecological cancer increased from 12,418 to 214,956 (P for trend < 0.001). The in-hospital mortality rate due to breast cancer decreased from 1.70 to 1.07% (P for trend < 0.001). Hospitalizations for both breast and gynecological cancer increased clearly, whether in urban or rural. The gap between urban and rural has narrowed. The average cost per hospitalization for breast cancer significantly increased. However, the average LOS for breast cancer gradually decreased (from 17.0 to 10.7 days, P for trend < 0.001). The average cost per hospitalization for gynecological cancer increased significantly. However, this steady downward trend was observed in the average LOS for gynecological cancer (from 10.34 to 6.69 days, P for trend = 0.003). The increase in hospitalizations and medical expenses for breast and gynecological cancer should encourage healthcare policymakers and healthcare system stakeholders to develop more cost-effective approaches to women's cancer management., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The aim of this study was to explore the intricate relationship between serum metabolomics and lifestyle factors, shedding light on their impact on health in the context of breast cancer risk. Detailed metabolic profiles of 2283 female participants in the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT study) were obtained through nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (MS).We show that lifestyle-related variables can explain up to 30% of the variance in individual metabolites. Age and obesity were the primary factors affecting the serum metabolic profile, both associated with increased levels of triglyceride-rich very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL) and intermediate-density lipoproteins (IDL), amino acids and glycolysis-related metabolites, and decreased levels of high-density lipoproteins (HDL). Moreover, factors like hormonal changes associated with menstruation and contraceptive use or education level influence the metabolite levels.Participants were clustered into three distinct clusters based on lifestyle-related factors, revealing metabolic similarities between obese and older individuals, despite diverse lifestyle factors, suggesting accelerated metabolic aging with obesity. Our results show that metabolic associations to cancer risk may partly be explained by modifiable lifestyle factors., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer care across Brazilian regions with varying Human Development Index (HDI) levels remains unclear. This study evaluates the pandemic's effects on screening mammograms, tumor staging at diagnosis, and treatment initiation in the Brazilian Public Health System between 2017 and 2022, focusing on regions with different HDI levels., Methods: This ecological time series study uses an inflection point regression model and monthly percentage change (MPC) to analyze an open-access Brazilian Public Healthcare System dataset. The study focuses on trends and variations in these variables among women aged 50-69 in three state groups classified by HDI: Group A (very high), Group B (medium), and Group C (high)., Results: The average monthly rate of screening mammograms was highest in Group A (10.70) and lowest in Group B (8.38). At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, screening rates dropped significantly, with the most significant decline in Group B (58.6% decrease) and the smallest in Group A (45.7% decrease), lasting for three months. Subsequently, this variable recovered until December 2022 but was insufficient to restore the total series MPC to pre-pandemic levels. Group B had the lowest average rate of early-stage (0-II) diagnoses (2.88), while Group C had the highest (3.68). Early-stage diagnoses declined in the first three months of the pandemic, followed by a partial recovery that was insufficient to restore the pre-pandemic MPC levels. The proportion of advanced-stage diagnoses was highest in Group B (49.02%) and lowest in Group A (45.97%). The pandemic maintained the upward trend of advanced-stage (III-IV) diagnoses across all groups in the total time series. The average proportion of treatments initiated after 60 days of diagnosis was above 60% across all groups, with Group B at 64.50%. This variable began to rise 3 to 4 months after the pandemic and continued increasing until December 2022, with a greater intensity than the pre-pandemic period across all groups., Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic reduced breast cancer screening and early diagnosis in Brazil, leading to more advanced cases and treatment delays across all regions, with varying impacts according to regional HDI levels., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: Changes in a patient's reported breast density status (dense vs nondense) trigger modifications in their cancer risk profile and supplemental screening recommendations. This study tracked the frequency and longitudinal sequence of breast density status changes among patients who received serial mammograms., Methods: This IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective cohort study tracked breast density changes among patients who received at least 2 mammograms over an 8-year study period. BI-RADS density assessment categories A through D, visually determined at the time of screening, were abstracted from electronic medical records and dichotomized into either nondense (categories A or B) or dense (categories C or D) status. A sequence analysis of longitudinal changes in density status was performed using Microsoft SQL., Results: A total of 58 895 patients underwent 231 997 screening mammograms. Most patients maintained the same BI-RADS density category A through D (87.35% [51 444/58 895]) and density status (93.35% [54 978/58 859]) throughout the study period. Among patients whose density status changed, the majority (97% [3800/3917]) had either scattered or heterogeneously dense tissue, and over half (57% [2235/3917]) alternated between dense and nondense status multiple times., Conclusion: Our results suggest that many cases of density status change may be attributable to intra- and interradiologist variability rather than to true underlying changes in density. These results lend support to consideration of automated density assessment because breast density status changes can significantly impact cancer risk assessment and supplemental screening recommendations., (© Society of Breast Imaging 2024. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is associated with an increased risk of postmenopausal breast cancer, predominantly the luminal A-like subtype. The impact of MHT on deaths from breast cancer subtypes is less understood. This study aimed to explore associations between MHT use and the incidence, mortality, and survival of intrinsic-like breast cancer subtypes., Methods: Data from 160,881 participants with self-reported MHT use from the prospective Norwegian Women and Cancer Study were analyzed. Among them, 7,844 incident breast cancer cases, and 721 breast cancer-specific deaths occurred. Cox proportional hazard regression was performed to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between MHT use and the incidence, mortality, and survival of breast cancer subtypes., Results: MHT use was associated with increased risk of overall, luminal A-like, and luminal B-like breast cancer, with respective HRs of 1.44 (95% CI 1.36-1.52), 1.41 (95% CI 1.31-1.52), and 1.23 (95% CI 1.09-1.40) among current estrogen-progestin therapy (EPT) users compared with never users. The risk increased by 4%, 4%, and 2% per year of EPT use for overall, luminal A-like, and luminal B-like breast cancers, respectively. MHT use was also associated with increased risk of overall and luminal A-like breast cancer mortality, with HRs 1.61% (95% CI 1.36-1.91) and 2.15% (95% CI 1.51-3.05) increased risk among current EPT users compared with non-users. Among patients with breast cancer, pre-diagnostic MHT use was not associated with worse survival from overall breast cancer but was inversely associated with survival from triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC; HR death 0.41; 95% CI 0.24-0.73 among current users). Results varied significantly according to tumor subtype (p heterogeneity  = 0.02)., Conclusions: Our study suggests that MHT use increases the risk of incident and fatal overall and luminal A-like, and incident luminal B-like breast cancer but does not decrease overall survival among patients with breast cancer. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying MHT use and breast cancer lethality, and to explore whether MHT use among patients with TNBC is indeed free from harm., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common pregnancy complication characterized by insulin resistance. A link has been suggested between insulin resistance and breast cancer, which is the most common cancer in women. Hence, women with previous GDM may be at increased risk of developing breast cancer, yet, the existing evidence is conflicting. This study explored the association between GDM and incident breast cancer, including age at cancer diagnosis. Additionally, we investigated the potential impact of severity of insulin resistance during pregnancy and of subsequent diabetes development on the breast cancer risk., Methods: We conducted a nationwide, register-based cohort study including all women giving birth in Denmark from 1997 to 2018. We defined GDM and breast cancer based on ICD-10 codes. Premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer was pragmatically defined as age at outcome < 50 years and ≥ 50 years, respectively. A proxy for severity of insulin resistance during pregnancy was based on insulin treatment; subsequent diabetes was defined as presence of ICD-10 codes and/or antidiabetic medication after pregnancy. The statistical analyses included Cox regression, logistic regression and t-test., Results: Of 708,121 women, 3.4% had GDM. The median follow-up period was 11.9 years (range 0-21.9). The overall breast cancer risk was comparable in women with and without previous GDM (adjusted hazard ratio 0.96 [95% CI 0.83-1.12]). Premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer risk also did not differ; however, women with previous GDM had a breast cancer diagnosis at younger age (42.6 vs. 43.5 years, p-value 0.01). All-cause mortality was similar regardless of GDM history. Severity of insulin resistance during pregnancy and subsequent diabetes did not affect breast cancer risk., Conclusions: This large, population-based cohort study showed no higher risk of incident breast cancer in women with previous GDM compared to women without previous GDM after a median of almost 12 years of follow-up. This was evident irrespective of menopausal state. The breast cancer risk was not influenced by the severity of insulin resistance during pregnancy and by subsequent diabetes development. Regardless of GDM history, attention towards prevention, early detection and treatment of breast cancer should be prioritized., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality among women. Still, there is a paucity of studies to know the magnitude of the problem in Ethiopia. Hence, this review was intended to pool the prevalence and identify the determinants of breast cancer in Ethiopia., Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted., Data Sources: Databases like PubMed/MEDLINE, HINARI, Science Direct, and Google Scholar, as well as websites of organisationsI organizations,rewere searched between 25 February and 6 March 2023., Eligibility Criteria: All observational studies in Ethiopia that reported either the magnitude and/or determinants of breast cancer regardless of publication status were included., Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two authors independently assessed and extracted the data. The Joanna Briggs Institute meta-analysis of statistics assessment and review instrument quality appraisal tool was used to assess the quality of the articles. Effect estimates were done by using the random-effects model. The meta-analysis results were displayed by using forest plots., Results: Seventeen articles were reviewed with 24 435 total participants. The pooled proportion of breast cancer morbidity among patients with cancer was 20. 58% (95% CI 17.25%, 23.90%) in Ethiopia. Consuming packed foods (POR=2.12, 95% CI 1.41, 3.17), presence of high cholesterol (POR=4.08; 95% CI 2.75, 6.07), physical inactivity (POR=3.27; 95% CI 1.80, 5.94), high body mass index (BMI) (POR=2.27; 95% CI 0.85, 6.03), postmenopause (POR=2.25; 95% CI 1.63, 3.10), family history of cancer (POR=3.65; 95% CI 0.85, 15.71) and lack of breastfeeding (POR=2.76; 95% CI 0.90, 7.92) were the determinants of breast cancer., Conclusions: One of five patients with cancer is diagnosed with breast cancer in Ethiopia. Furthermore, more than a quarter of women with cancer suffer from breast cancer. Processed food consumption, high cholesterol in the body, lack of physical activity, high BMI, postmenopause, family history of cancer and lack of breastfeeding were the risk factors for breast cancer. The use of healthy food sources such as fruits and vegetables, and homegrown varieties of crops rather than seeking processed foods would help., Prospero Registration Number: CRD42023417733., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women worldwide, and it is associated with significant number of metabolic and reproductive risk factors. Despite the overlap between hormonal and metabolic factors involved in the development of PCOS and many known risk factors for breast cancer, the relationship between PCOS and breast cancer, the most common type of cancer among women, remains unknown. This study was conducted with the aim of determining the relationship between breast cancer and clinical symptoms of PCOS., Methods: This case-control study was conducted on 285 women with breast cancer and 285 healthy women referred to three centers in Tehran in 2023. Both the case and control groups were matched in terms of age and body mass index. The data collection tool in this study was a researcher-made data registration form, that was completed in person by qualified individuals. A history of PCOS was identified according to the Rotterdam criteria. Women aged 15-49 years who were able to read and write were included in the study. The case group had a history of breast cancer, while the control group did not. Participants who did not consent to having their data use in the analysis were excluded. Data was analyzed using an independent t-test, a chi-square test and a logistic regression model., Results: The mean age of the participants in the case group was 43.05 ± 4.92 years and that of the control group was 42.78 ± 5.06 years. The two groups showed a statistically significant difference in terms of PCOS history (p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounding variables, the logistic regression model showed that women with PCOS had a significantly higher chance of developing breast cancer (0R: 3.677, 95%CI: 1.529-8.840, P = 0.004). Among PCOS symptoms, women with a history of hirsutism had a higher chance of developing breast cancer (OR: 2.188, 95% CI: 1.014-4.720, P = 0.046)., Conclusion: The findings of the present study suggest that PCOS is a risk factor for breast cancer. Well-designed further studies are highly recommended to determine the role of PCOS in predicting breast cancer., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Age is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer. Measures of biological age based on DNA methylation have gained popularity for their strong association with risk of many diseases, including cancer, which may help to identify high-risk subgroups for targeted prevention., Methods: We carried out a systematic review of prospective studies that examined the association of methylation-based markers of ageing with risk of invasive breast cancer in healthy (breast cancer-free) women, published up to May 2023. The search of three databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science) identified 2913 individual abstracts eligible for screening. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using ROBINS-E., Results: Ten prospective studies met the eligibility criteria, and these were heterogeneous in design and findings. The most frequently assessed epigenetic ageing measures were Horvath's first-generation clock, PhenoAge and GrimAge. Four studies reported mainly positive associations, five null associations and one reported a negative association. These associations were generally weak and the results were not consistent across epigenetic ageing measures., Conclusion: The summarised evidence is insufficient to support a role for current epigenetic ageing measures to stratify breast cancer risk. PROSPERO Registration: This systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42023417559)., (© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: To explore the prevalence of dense breast tissue among screened postmenopausal women and identify the factors influencing breast density in this population., Methods: A retrospective analysis of data from postmenopausal women screened for breast cancer in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, between April 2017 and June 2021 was carried out. Breast density was subjectively assessed, and influencing factors were retrieved from the hospital information system. Proportions were used for descriptive analysis, and binary logistic regression was used to identify the determinants of dense breast tissue., Results: Only 12.7% of the postmenopausal women had dense breast tissue. Non-Saudi women (odds ratio [OR]=1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.07-3.54], p =0.02) and those who did not breastfeed (OR=2.75, 95% CI: [1.33-5.53], p =0.006) had a greater likelihood of having dense breast tissue. Women who had never been pregnant (nulliparous) were 4 times more likely to have dense breast tissue than those who had been pregnant (parous; p <0.001). Additionally, women with fewer children had a higher chance of dense breast tissue (OR=2.58, 95% CI: [1.23-5.40], p =0.01)., Conclusion: The prevalence of dense breast tissue among screened postmenopausal women was low. However, certain factors increase the risk of having dense tissue in this population, including not being Saudi Arabian, never having breastfed, being nulliparous, and having fewer children., (Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal.)

Background: Breast cancer is a global concern, with 2.3 million new cases and 685,000 deaths recorded in 2020, and projections of reaching 4.4 million cases by 2070. In Tanzania, it's the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women, often diagnosed at advanced stages, leading to poor outcomes. Only 5% of women in the country report undergoing breast cancer screening, the aim study is to determine factors associated with breast cancer screening in Tanzania., Methods: This was analytical cross-sectional study among women of reproductive age in Tanzania, utilizing data from the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) which employed a two-stage probability sampling. A weighted sample of 15,189 women of reproductive age (15-49) was included in the study. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to examine factors associated with breast cancer screening. These results were presented using adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence interval., Results: After controlling for other factors, the following factors remained significantly associated with breast cancer screening among women of reproductive age; age(AOR = 5.33, 95% CI 3.72, 7.63), being wealthy (AOR = 2.34, 95% CI 1.61, 3.38), residing in rural(AOR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.46, 0.763), being educated(AOR = 2.43, 95% CI 1.60, 3.68), being insured(AOR = 2.40, 95% CI 1.89, 3.06), healthcare facility visits in the past 12 months(AOR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.14, 1.78) and living in Northern zone (AOR = 2.43, 95% CI 1.42, 4.15) compared to western zone., Conclusion: Breast cancer screening is still under-utilized and have shown to be marginalized in women of reproductive age. Upgrading diagnostic services, comprehensive health education and awareness campaigns are instrumental to increase utilization and reduction of burden of breast cancers in Tanzania., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Tibenderana et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Opinion Statement: Breast cancer does not wait until a woman reaches her 50's to strike. One in six cases occurs in women between the ages of 40 and 49 and breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women under 50 in the United States (10% of breast cancer deaths), emphasizing the urgency of early detection (American Society. 2024). Duffy et al. highlight the vital role of mammography screening in younger women, showing that starting screening at 40 reduces breast cancer mortality, with a consistent absolute reduction over time (Duffy et al. Health Technol Assess. 24(55):1-24, 2020). By starting yearly mammograms at 40, we could see a remarkable 40% reduction in breast cancer deaths (Monticciolo et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 18(9):1280-8, 2021). Screening at age 40 also adds little to the burden of overdiagnosis that already arises from screening at age 50 and older. Comparing this to biennial screening between ages 50-74, yearly screening at 40 saves approximately 13,770 more lives annually according to a report by the American Cancer Society published in JAMA in 2015 (Oeffinger et al. JAMA. 314(15):1599-614, 2015). But it's not just about saving lives; it's also about preserving quality of life. Between ages 40 and 49, 12-15% of years of life lost are attributed to breast cancer, highlighting the impact on women's lives. Early detection through screening can minimize these losses, ensuring more years spent with loved ones. It's clear: starting mammograms at age 40 saves lives. We must prioritize early detection and make screening accessible to all women, regardless of age. This proactive approach can reduce the burden of breast cancer and pave the way for a healthier future for women everywhere., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

This is the American Cancer Society's biennial update of statistics on breast cancer among women based on high-quality incidence and mortality data from the National Cancer Institute and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breast cancer incidence continued an upward trend, rising by 1% annually during 2012-2021, largely confined to localized-stage and hormone receptor-positive disease. A steeper increase in women younger than 50 years (1.4% annually) versus 50 years and older (0.7%) overall was only significant among White women. Asian American/Pacific Islander women had the fastest increase in both age groups (2.7% and 2.5% per year, respectively); consequently, young Asian American/Pacific Islander women had the second lowest rate in 2000 (57.4 per 100,000) but the highest rate in 2021 (86.3 per 100,000) alongside White women (86.4 per 100,000), surpassing Black women (81.5 per 100,000). In contrast, the overall breast cancer death rate continuously declined during 1989-2022 by 44% overall, translating to 517,900 fewer breast cancer deaths during this time. However, not all women have experienced this progress; mortality remained unchanged since 1990 in American Indian/Alaska Native women, and Black women have 38% higher mortality than White women despite 5% lower incidence. Although the Black-White disparity partly reflects more triple-negative cancers, Black women have the lowest survival for every breast cancer subtype and stage except localized disease, with which they are 10% less likely to be diagnosed than White women (58% vs. 68%), highlighting disadvantages in social determinants of health. Progress against breast cancer could be accelerated by mitigating racial, ethnic, and social disparities through improved clinical trial representation and access to high-quality screening and treatment., (© 2024 The Author(s). CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.)

Background: Breast cancer has been associated with monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic (clinical, reproductive, and lifestyle) risk factors, but studies evaluating the combined effects of these factors have been limited., Methods: We extended previous work in breast cancer risk modeling, incorporating pathogenic variants (PV) in six breast cancer predisposition genes and a 105-SNP polygenic risk score (PRS), to include an epidemiologic risk score (ERS) in a sample of non-Hispanic White women drawn from prospective cohorts and population-based case-control studies, with 23,518 cases and 22,832 controls, from the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility (CARRIERS) Consortium., Results: The model predicts 4.4-fold higher risk of breast cancer for postmenopausal women with no predisposition PV and median PRS, but with the highest versus lowest ERS. Overall, women with CHEK2 PVs had >20% lifetime risk of breast cancer. However, 15.6% of women with CHEK2 PVs and a family history of breast cancer, and 45.1% of women with CHEK2 PVs but without a family history of breast cancer, had low (<20%) predicted lifetime risk and thus were below the threshold for MRI screening. CHEK2 PV carriers at the 10th percentile of the joint distribution of ERS and PRS, without a family history of breast cancer, had a predicted lifetime risk similar to the general population., Conclusions: These results illustrate that an ERS, alone and combined with the PRS, can contribute to clinically relevant risk stratification., Impact: Integrating monogenic, polygenic, and epidemiologic risk factors in breast cancer risk prediction models may inform personalized screening and prevention efforts., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Observational studies have shown that cholelithiasis and cholecystectomy are associated with the risk of breast cancer (BC) and gynecological cancers, but whether these relationships are causal has not been established and remains controversial., Methods: Our study began with a meta-analysis that synthesized data from prior observational studies to examine the association between cholelithiasis, cholecystectomy, and the risk of BC and gynecological cancers. Subsequently, a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was conducted utilizing genetic variant data to investigate the potential causal relationship between cholelithiasis, cholecystectomy, and the aforementioned cancers., Results: The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated a significant association between cholecystectomy and the risk of BC (risk ratio [RR] = 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.06, p = 0.002) and endometrial cancer (EC) (RR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.02-1.56, p = 0.031). Conversely, no significant association was observed between cholelithiasis and the risk of BC, EC, and ovarian cancer. The MR analysis revealed no discernible causal connection between cholelithiasis and overall BC (p = 0.053), as well as BC subtypes (including estrogen receptor-positive/negative). Similarly, there was no causal effect of cholecystectomy on BC risk (p = 0.399) and its subtypes. Furthermore, no causal associations were identified between cholelithiasis, cholecystectomy, and the risk of gynecological cancers (ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer [CC]) (all p > 0.05)., Conclusion: This study does not support a causal link between cholelithiasis and cholecystectomy and an increased risk of female cancers such as breast, endometrial, ovarian, and CC., (© 2024 University College London (UCL) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer deaths in women, with psychosocial stress commonly cited by patients as one of its causes. While there is conflicting epidemiological evidence investigating the association between psychosocial stress and breast cancer incidence and progression, there is reason to believe that interventions aimed at reducing stress pharmacologically or psychologically may improve breast cancer outcomes. The aim of this review is to discuss the molecular and biological mechanisms of stress-attributed breast cancer incidence and progression, including the induction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), as well as decreased immune function and stress hormone-induced resistance to chemotherapy. Moreover, these mechanisms have been cited as potential therapeutic targets of pharmacologic and psychological interventions that may improve the care, well-being and survival of breast cancer patients. Further research is recommended to investigate whether interventions in the primary care setting for women with risk factors for breast cancer development may lead to a decreased incidence of invasive breast tumors., Competing Interests: Declarations Conflict of interest The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval As this was a retrospective review, the research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent to participate Informed consent was waived for this research as this was a retrospective review not involving active research on human subjects., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Purpose: Few breast cancer risk assessment models account for the risk profiles of different tumor subtypes. This study evaluated whether a subtype-specific approach improves discrimination., Methods: Among 3389 women who had a screening mammogram and were later diagnosed with invasive breast cancer we performed multinomial logistic regression with tumor subtype as the outcome and known breast cancer risk factors as predictors. Tumor subtypes were defined by expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) based on immunohistochemistry. Discrimination was assessed with the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). Absolute risk of each subtype was estimated by proportioning Gail absolute risk estimates by the predicted probabilities for each subtype. We then compared risk factor distributions for women in the highest deciles of risk for each subtype., Results: There were 3,073 ER/PR+ HER2 - , 340 ER/PR +HER2 + , 126 ER/PR-ER2+, and 300 triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC). Discrimination differed by subtype; ER/PR-HER2+ (AUC: 0.64, 95% CI 0.59, 0.69) and TNBC (AUC: 0.64, 95% CI 0.61, 0.68) had better discrimination than ER/PR+HER2+ (AUC: 0.61, 95% CI 0.58, 0.64). Compared to other subtypes, patients at high absolute risk of TNBC were younger, mostly Black, had no family history of breast cancer, and higher BMI. Those at high absolute risk of HER2+ cancers were younger and had lower BMI., Conclusion: Our study provides proof of concept that stratifying risk prediction for breast cancer subtypes may enable identification of patients with unique profiles conferring increased risk for tumor subtypes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Numerous recent studies have explored the association between metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and the risk of various extrahepatic cancers. However, the conclusions were inconclusive. The aim of this study was to clarify this relationship by conducting a robust meta-analysis., Methods: Systematic searches were conducted on PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases to identify relevant cohort studies published prior to February 2024. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were combined using a random-effects model in this meta-analysis., Results: Eighteen cohort studies (approximately 16.7 million participants) were finally included in this meta-analysis. MASLD was linked to a higher risk of extrahepatic cancers, such as gastric (n = 10, HR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.07-2.01), colorectal (n = 13, HR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.16-1.53), pancreatic (n = 8, HR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.11-1.79), biliary tract (n = 5, HR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.18-1.37), thyroid (n = 6, HR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.02-2.09), urinary system (n = 10, HR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.25-1.69), breast (n = 11, HR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.08-1.26) and female genital organ cancers (n = 10, HR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.11-1.66). However, there was no statistically significant association between MASLD and the risk of head and neck (n = 6, HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 99-1.07), oesophageal (n = 9, HR = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.86-1.86), lung (n = 9, HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.92-1.10), prostate (n = 9, HR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.94-1.19) or small intestine cancer (n = 2, HR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.00-3.06)., Conclusions: This latest large-scale meta-analysis indicated that MASLD was associated with an increased risk of various extrahepatic cancers, such as gastric, colorectal, pancreatic, biliary duct, thyroid, urinary system, breast, skin and female genital cancers. Further research is needed to investigate the mechanisms underlying these associations., (© 2024 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Height and mammographic breast density are well-known risk factors for breast cancer. This study aims to investigate the association between height and mammographic density with breast cancer risk in a large population-based cohort of Korean women., Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 4,851,115 women ages 40 and older who underwent screening mammography through the Korean National Cancer Screening Program between 2009 and 2014 and were followed up until 2016. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate adjusted HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the associations among height, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk., Results: A taller stature was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, with women in the highest quintile of height (Q5) having a 1.54-fold (95% CI, 1.49-1.59) greater risk than those in the lowest quintile (Q1). When analyzing breast cancer risk based on height and mammographic density, women in the highest quintile for height (Q5) with extremely dense breasts had a 4.51-fold (95% CI, 4.24-4.79) greater risk than those in the lowest quintile (Q1) with almost entirely fatty breasts (Ptrend < 0.001)., Conclusions: This first study to simultaneously examine these two variables found that height and mammographic density were independently associated with breast cancer risk in this large cohort of Korean women., Impact: Height and mammographic density can help stratify risk in screening populations for breast cancer. Careful consideration of screening strategies may be beneficial for taller women with dense breasts., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Food security, and reliable access to nutritious food, is essential for maintaining health yet remains elusive for many, including U.S. patients with breast cancer (BC). Research specifically focusing on public health consequences of food insecurity in BC survivors is limited. We addressed this gap by exploring the relationship between food security and various sociodemographic, clinical, and cancer-related factors among Black BC survivors in Maryland., Methods: The parent study engaged Black female BC survivors in Maryland through digital campaigns and referrals, achieving 100 completed surveys. Food security was assessed through an online follow-up survey with the six-item short form from U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), leading to a binary classification for analysis from raw scores. Statistical analysis involved descriptive analysis and Chi-square tests to explore the relationship between food security status, various BC risk factors, and follow-up survey response status., Results: Of the 31 participants who participated in the follow-up survey, 11 (35.5%) were categorized as having low food security. We observed significant associations between food security status and both income (< $40,000; chi-square p = 0.004) and education levels (high school/GED; chi-square p = 0.004). In comparing respondents to non-respondents, significant differences in employment (p = 0.031) and health insurance status (p = 0.006) were observed., Conclusion: Our descriptive findings demonstrate the importance of further studies evaluating food security screenings in Black BC survivors to enable targeted interventions aiming to improve overall health outcomes and equity in cancer survivorship care., Competing Interests: Declarations Competing interests The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Ethical approval The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Institutional Review Board. Passive consent for participation was obtained electronically from the participants. Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements. Consent for publish The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication. Consent to participate Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Purpose: Breast cancer (BC) incidence is increasing globally. Age-specific BC incidence trend analyses are lacking for women under age 50 in Canada. In this study, we evaluate the incidence trends in breast cancer in women under age 50 in Canada and compare them with corresponding trends among women 50 to 54. Methods: BC case counts were obtained from the National Cancer Incidence Reporting System (1984-1991) and the Canadian Cancer Registry (1992-2019) both housed at Statistics Canada. Population data were also obtained from Statistics Canada. Annual female BC age-specific incidence rates from 1984 to 2019 were derived for the following age groups: 20 to 29, 30 to 39, 40 to 49, 40 to 44, 45 to 49, and 50 to 54. Changes in trends in age-specific BC incidence rates, if any, and annual percent changes (APCs) for each identified trend, were determined using JoinPoint. Results: Statistically significant increasing trends in BC incidence rates were noted for almost all age groups: since 2001 for 20 to 29 (APC = 3.06%, P < .001); since 2009 for 30 to 39 (APC = 1.25%, P = .007); since 1984 for both 40 to 49 (APC = 0.26%, P < .001) and 40 to 44 (APC = 0.19%, P = .011), increased since 2015 for 40 to 49 (APC = 0.77%, P = .047); and since 2005 for 50 to 54 (APC = 0.38%, P = .022). Among women 45 to 49 there was a non-significant increase since 2005 (APC = 0.24, P = .058). Statistically significant average annualized increases in BC incidence rates were observed for each age group studied. Conclusions: Examining age-specific incidence rates formed a more complete picture of BC time trends with significant increasing trends in the incidence of BC among women in their 20s, 30s, 40s, and early 50s. A greater awareness regarding the increasing number of cases of BC in women younger than 50 is critical to allow for earlier diagnosis with its resultant reduced mortality and morbidity., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr Seely declares receiving an honorarium for BD speaker fee in 2023. No other COI are declared.

Background: Tailored, preventive cancer care requires the identification of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) among potentially at-risk blood relatives (BRs). Cascade testing is carried out for BRs of probands who are positive for PGVs of an inherited cancer but not for negative probands. This study was conducted to examine the prevalence of PGVs for BRs of PGV-negative probands., Methods: PGV prevalence was assessed for 682 BRs of 281 probands with BRCA1/BRCA2 wild-type hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome., Results: PGVs were discovered in 22 (45.8%) of the 48 BRs of the PGV-positive probands and in 14 (2.2%) of 634 BRs of the PGV-negative probands. Eleven PGVs on high-risk BRCA1, BRCA2, and TP53 genes were present only in BRs and not in the probands (probands vs BRs in Fisher exact test; p = 0.0104; odds ratio [OR] = 0.000 [0.000-0.5489 of 95% confidence interval]), partly due to the nature of the selection criteria. The enrichment of high-risk PGVs among BRs was also significant as compared with a non-cancer East Asian population (p = 0.0016; OR = 3.0791 [1.5521-5.6694]). PGV prevalence, risk class of gene, and genotype concordance were unaffected by the cancer history among BRs., Conclusion: These findings imply the necessity to construct a novel testing scheme to complement cascade testing., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Women with a personal history of breast cancer have an increased risk of subsequent breast malignancy and may benefit from more sensitive surveillance than conventional mammography (MG). We previously reported outcomes for first surveillance episode using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), demonstrating higher sensitivity and comparable specificity to MG. We now report CEM performance for subsequent surveillance., Methods: A retrospective study of 1,190 women in an Australian hospital setting undergoing annual surveillance following initial surveillance CEM between June 2016 and December 2022. Outcome measures were recall rate, cancer detection rate, contribution of contrast to recalls, false positive rate, interval cancer rate and characteristics of surveillance detected and interval cancers., Results: 2,592 incident surveillance episodes were analysed, of which 93% involved contrast-based imaging. Of 116 (4.5%) recall episodes, 40/116 (34%) recalls were malignant (27 invasive; 13 ductal carcinoma in situ), totalling 15.4 cancers per 1000 surveillance episodes. 55/116 (47%) recalls were contrast-directed including 17/40 (43%) true positive recalls. Tumour features were similar for contrast-directed recalls and other diagnoses. 8/9 (89%) of contrast-directed invasive recalls were Grade 2-3, and 5/9 (56%) were triple negative breast cancers. There were two symptomatic interval cancers (0.8 per 1000 surveillance episodes, program sensitivity 96%)., Conclusion: Routine use of CEM in surveillance of women with PHBC led to an increase in the detection of clinically significant malignant lesions, with a low interval cancer rate compared to previous published series. Compared to mammographic surveillance, contrast-enhanced mammography increases the sensitivity of surveillance programs for women with PHBC., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: This study investigated the trends in breast density in Korean women and their association with the incidence of breast cancer, incorporating the trends in the known risk factors for breast cancer from an ecological perspective., Methods: The prevalence of risk factors for breast cancer from the National Health and Nutrition Survey, breast density from Korea's national breast cancer screening program, and breast cancer incidence from the Korea Central Cancer Registry during 2010-2018 were applied after age-standardization to the population at the middle of the year 2000. The association between the prevalence of risk factors for breast cancer, the prevalence of dense breast, and the incidence rate of breast cancer was estimated using linear regression., Results: The proportion of age-standardized dense breasts steadily increased from 45.8 % in 2010 to 51.5 % in 2018. The increased prevalence of dense breasts in women was positively related to the prevalence of smoking, drinking, lack of exercise, early menarche age (<15 years old), premenopausal status, nulliparity, and no history of breastfeeding, and negatively related to the prevalence of obesity. The increased prevalence of the dense breast was associated with an increase in the incidence of breast cancer, and 96 % of the variation in breast cancer incidence could be explained by the variation in the prevalence of dense breast. The factors associated with dense breast and breast cancer incidence overlapped., Conclusions: Trends in breast cancer risk factors were associated with an increased prevalence of dense breast, which, in turn, was associated with an increased incidence of breast cancer in Korea., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Women with a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer have an increased ovarian cancer risk. Yet it remains uncertain if common ovarian cancer risk factors-especially those that are modifiable-affect this high-risk population similarly to the general population., Methods: Using the Danish and Swedish nationwide registers, we established 2 nested case-control study populations in women with a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (2138 ovarian cancers, 85 240 controls) and women without (10 730 ovarian cancers, 429 200 controls). The overall and histology-specific associations were assessed with conditional logistic regression. The country-specific estimates were combined based on a fixed-effect assumption., Results: Multiparity, hysterectomy, tubal ligation, salpingectomy, and oral contraceptive (OC) use were associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer in women with and without a family history, while endometriosis and menopausal hormone therapy were associated with increased risk. Multiparity and OC use presented protective effects across all histologic subtypes except mucinous ovarian cancer, which was not associated with OC use. Menopausal hormone treatment increased the risk of serous ovarian cancer but decreased the risk of the mucinous and clear cell cancers. Endometriosis was especially related to an increased risk of endometrioid and clear cell ovarian cancer., Conclusion: Factors associated with a decreased ovarian cancer risk were similar between women with and without a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Given the higher baseline risk for women with a family history, special attention should be paid to risk factors like endometriosis and nulliparity in this high-risk population., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Purpose: In East Asia, the incidence of breast cancer has been increasing rapidly, particularly among premenopausal women. An elevated ratio of estrogen-DNA adducts was linked to a higher risk of breast cancer. The present study explored the influence of the interaction between base excision repair (BER) gene polymorphisms and estrogen-DNA adducts on breast cancer risk., Methods: We conducted a case-control study comprising healthy volunteers and individuals with benign breast disease (control arm, n = 176) and patients with invasive carcinoma or carcinoma in situ (case arm, n = 177). Genotyping for BER-related genes, including SMUG1, OGG1, ERCC5, and APEX1, was performed. A logistic regression model, incorporating interactions between gene polymorphisms, estrogen-DNA adduct ratio, and clinical variables, was used to identify the risk factors for breast cancer., Results: Univariate analysis indicated marginal associations between breast cancer risk and APEX1 rs1130409 T > G (P = 0.057) and APEX1 rs1760944 T > G (P = 0.065). Multivariate regression analysis revealed significant associations with increased breast cancer risk for APEX1&#95;rs1130409 (GT/GG versus TT) combined with a natural logarithmic value of the estrogen-DNA adduct ratio (estimated OR 1.164, P = 0.023) and premenopausal status with an estrogen-DNA adduct ratio > 2.93 (estimated OR 2.433, P = 0.001)., Conclusion: APEX1&#95;rs1130409 (GT/GG versus TT) polymorphisms, which are related to decreased BER activity, combined with an increased ratio of estrogen-DNA adducts, increase the risk of breast cancer in East Asian women., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Acetate, a short-chain fatty acid, has gained attention for its contrasting roles, with evidence suggesting it may offer cardiovascular protection but also promote cancer, particularly those involving sex hormones. However, these influences have been scarcely assessed in epidemiological research., Objective: To investigate the relationship between acetate and ischemic heart disease (IHD), diabetes, and cancers related to sex hormones., Methods: Mendelian randomization (MR) was used to assess potential causal effects, selecting genetic variants without linkage disequilibrium (r 2 < 0.001) and with genome-wide significance for acetate ( p < 5 × 10 -8 ). These variants were applied to large genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for ischemic heart disease (IHD; up to 154,373 cases), diabetes (109,731 cases), and five sex-hormone-related cancers (breast, colorectal, prostate, ovarian, and endometrial cancers, ranging from 8679 to 122,977 cases). We employed various methods for analysis, including penalized inverse variance weighting (pIVW), inverse variance weighting, weighted mode, and weighted median., Results: This study indicates that acetate may be associated with a lower risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD), with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.62 per standard deviation (SD) increase in acetate and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.39 to 0.98. Additionally, acetate was linked to a higher breast cancer risk, with an OR of 1.26 and a 95% CI ranging from 1.08 to 1.46. This association remained robust across multiple sensitivity analyses., Conclusions: Acetate, along with factors that influence its activity, may serve as possible targets for breast cancer treatment and possibly IHD, offering opportunities for new drug development.

Introduction: In recent decades, attendance to organized breast cancer screening has been decreasing in European countries. This could be partly due to an increase in the use of opportunistic screening. The aim of this study was to assess the coverage of imaging in and outside the screening program in Finland during the period of 1999-2018. We also compared the usage of imaging services across sociodemographic groups in the more recent years (2017-2018)., Methods: Our initial data consisted of 1,159,000 screening-target-aged women (50-69 years) in 1999-2018 and 1,849,000 women aged 30-89 years in 2017-2018. Data on organized breast cancer screening program was drawn from the Finnish Cancer Registry and supplemented with comprehensive individual data on mammograms and ultrasounds performed outside the program., Results: Among the screening-aged women (50-69), a clear decline in the overall imaging coverage was observed during the study period (from 89 to 85%). The use of outside imaging increased slightly but not enough to compensate for the overall decrease. There were large differences in coverages between sociodemographic groups. Compared to manual workers and the unemployed, upper-level employees were around two times more active in using outside imaging (8.2% vs. 3.6% and 4.3%, respectively)., Interpretation: Overall breast imaging coverage has slowly decreased during the 2000s, while outside imaging has increased slightly. The coverage of imaging in and outside the program largely followed the same trends, with the highest usage concentrating on higher socioeconomical groups, native speakers and highly educated women.

Background: It has been shown that chronic inflammation is a significant factor in cancer development and progression. The current study aimed to investigate whether a higher score on the empirical dietary inflammatory pattern (EDIP), which indicates a more pro-inflammatory diet, is related to higher odds of breast cancer in Iranian women., Methods: In the present case-control study, subjects in the case (n = 133) and control (n = 265) groups were chosen from the hospitals in Tehran, Iran. The cases consisted of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, while the controls were selected from other parts of the same hospital and had no history of cancer or hormone therapy. Individuals whose reported energy intake deviated by three standard deviations above or below the mean energy intake of the population were excluded from the study. A reliable and valid semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire was used to determine the participants' dietary intake. Additionally, the association between breast cancer and EDIP was evaluated by logistic regression analysis in both crude and adjusted models., Results: The median scores of EDIP in the case and control groups were 0.65 and 0.61, respectively. The findings also indicated that, in the adjusted model, the odds of developing breast cancer significantly increased in the last tertile of EDIP compared to the first tertile (odds ratio (OR) = 1.859; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.059-3.265; P = 0.031). Additionally, after adjusting for potential confounders, higher odds of breast cancer were observed in the last tertile of EDIP compared to the first tertile in postmenopausal women (OR = 2.516; 95% CI: 1.081-5.856; P = 0.033)., Conclusions: The current study indicated that individuals with a higher pro-inflammatory diet score were more likely to develop breast cancer., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Breast cancer (BrCa) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths. There are several factors for getting BrCa, including some changeable factors related to lifestyle like unhealthy dietary patterns, so modifying them can prevent one third of the complications and deaths caused by BrCa. Therefore, we decided to investigate the relationship between Healthy Beverage Index (HBI) and the risk of BrCa., Methods: In this hospital-based case-control study, 253 patients with BrCa and 267 non-BrCa controls were enrolled. Food consumption was recorded to calculate the HBI score using a semi-quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ). Additionally, by using binary logistic regression analysis with adjustment for confounders, the relationship between HBI and the risk of BrCa were assessed. HBI was established by Duffey et al. and is used to evaluate the overall quality of beverage intake and identify changes in consumption., Results: Mean ± SD of age and BMI of the study participants were 47.92 ± 10.33 years and 29.43 ± 5.51 kg/m 2 , respectively. Patients with BrCa considerably outperformed controls in terms of waist circumference (WC), age at first pregnancy, history of abortion, and number of children(Pvalue < 0.05). Compared with those in the lowest quartile of HBI, subjects in the highest quartile had higher intake of energy, carbohydrate, protein, fat, fiber, sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, zinc, vitamin C, E, B9, fruits, vegetables, fish and nut as well as lower BMI and WC (Pvalue < 0.05). After adjustment for potential confounders, individuals in highest compared to lowest quartile of HBI had significantly lower risk of BrCa for total population (odds ratio (OR): 0.40; 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.21-0.76, Pvalue < 0.05), premenopausal (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.16-0.92, Pvalue = 0.013), and postmenopausal (OR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.10-0.78, Pvalue = 0.023)., Conclusion: Findings of this study suggested that higher HBI score decreased the risk of BrCa. However, further investigation is needed., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Benzene is a recognized carcinogen; however, its association with breast cancer is not well established. Hence, a meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies was performed to determine the association between occupational benzene exposure and the risk of breast cancer., Methods: A systematic literature review identified 7573 publications from which 23 cohort and case-control studies were retained and evaluated using meta-analyses (fixed effects model). PRISMA guidelines were followed. Our protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (Registration No. CRD42022379720). Study quality was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS)., Results: The summary relative risk (RR) for ever-benzene exposure was 1.08 (95% CI=1.03-1.14, I2=38.6%, n=23 risk estimates); corresponding RR for cancer incidence and mortality were 1.08 (95% CI=1.02-1.14, I2=56.1%, n=16) and 1.10 (95% CI=0.87-1.37, I2<0.001%, n=10). However, heterogeneity was detected for sex (p-het=0.002), publication year (p-het<0.001), study design (p-het<0.001), study quality (p-het<0.001), and industry of employment (p-het=0.03). The RR for high level of exposure showed positive association with breast cancer 1.35 (95% CI=1.06-1.72, I2 =<0.001%, n=3) and (P-het=0.64). Publication bias was detected (p=0.03)., Conclusions: The results of our meta-analysis indicate a positive association between occupational benzene exposure and an increased risk of breast cancer, particularly when exposed to higher levels of benzene. However, bias and confounding could not be excluded.

Objective: Analyze the cancer screening status of the cancer screening program in urban areas in Shaanxi province in 2019-2020. Methods: The early diagnosis and early treatment project for urban cancers carried out high-risk population screening for 5 types of high-incidence malignant tumors (breast cancer, lung cancer, upper gastrointestinal cancer, liver cancer, and colorectal cancer) in urban areas. Three prefecture-level cities in Shaanxi province with a population of over 1 million (Xi'an, Baoji, and Shangluo) were selected, and 4 communities with a relatively good working foundation were selected in each city. The general population aged 45-74 years was surveyed on the principles of informed consent and voluntariness, and high-risk groups identified through the questionnaire were further subjected to free endoscopy, ultrasound, CT, and other clinical screenings. The high-risk rates, screening compliance rates, and positive detection rates of the above 5 types of malignant tumors were analyzed. Results: A total of 19 632 people completed the survey effectively, with the proportion of male participants (40.0%) lower than that of females (60.0%). A total of 10 102 high-risk groups were identified, with an initial screening high-risk rate of 51.5%, and the high-risk rates for the 5 types of cancers were 24.1% for breast cancer, 28.6% for lung cancer, 9.1% for upper gastrointestinal cancer, 4.0% for liver cancer, and 20.0% for colorectal cancer. Among the 14 960 person-time initially assessed as high-risk, 5 129 person-time received clinical screening, with a screening compliance rate of 34.3%. The number of people receiving clinical screening and the screening compliance rates for the 5 types of cancers were 1 192 (41.9%) for breast cancer, 2 081 (37.1%) for lung cancer, 574 (32.0%) for upper gastrointestinal cancer, 404 (51.3%) for liver cancer, and 878 (22.3%) for colorectal cancer, with positive detection numbers and rates of 179 (15.0%) for breast, 289 (13.9%) for lung, 9 (1.6%) for upper gastrointestinal, 14 (3.5%) for suspected liver, and 67 (7.6%) for colorectal, respectively. Conclusion: The cancer screening status of the cancer screening program in urban areas in Shaanxi province is beneficial for the detection of precancerous lesions and early cancer patients, and improving the early diagnosis and treatment rate of patients, but the public participation rate is not high, and the project management model and technical plan need to be further improved.

Objective: To analyze the 5-year relative survival rate of cancer in Henan province based on cancer registration data. Methods: Cancer survival data were extracted from the cancer registration database of Henan province with the diagnosis date between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019 were included. The closing date of follow-up was set as December 31, 2019. The 5-year relative survival rate of cancer was calculated using the period survival analysis method and the Ederer II method in the R package "periodR", and the interest period was between 2015 and 2019. Results: During the period of 2015-2019, the overall 5-year relative survival rate of cancer patients in Henan province was 43.6%, and after age-standardization, it was 40.2%. The overall 5-year relative survival rate showed the characteristics of higher survival rate in females than males (45.9% vs 34.7%, Z =39.60, P ＜0.001) and higher survival rate in urban areas than rural areas (44.9% vs 39.1%, Z =12.97, P ＜0.001). The 5-year relative survival rate for cancer patients among children aged 0-14 was 60.2%, and for adults aged 15 and above, it was 43.5%, which was standardized to 40.2% after age adjustment. There are two types of cancers with a standardized 5-year relative survival rate exceeding 70% (thyroid cancer at 82.2% and breast cancer at 71.6%), and four cancers with a rate below 30% (pancreatic cancer at 18.2%, liver cancer at 19.6%, lung cancer at 24.0%, and gallbladder cancer at 26.6%). Conclusion: The cancer 5-year survival rate in Henan Province is lower than that of the national average, indicating the need for continued enhancement of cancer prevention and control measures.

The COVID-19 pandemic affected the diagnostics and treatment of breast cancer. Numerous studies reported an early decline in breast cancer (BC) incidence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Less evidence is available on changes in medical care. Reports from individual patients have provided anecdotal evidence for a shift from breast-conserving surgery to mastectomy to reduce the number of visits to radiation units during the pandemic. This study aimed to explore changes in BC incidence and surgical treatment in the south of Germany. Using data from the Baden-Württemberg Cancer Registry, the age-standardized incidence of BC (ICD-10 C50 and D05) (women) in 2018-2021 was investigated overall and by age and stage using standardized incidence ratios. Among pre-operative stage I/IIA BC patients, differences in the time to surgery and type of surgery were investigated using negative binomial and logistic regression models. The incidence of invasive BC decreased significantly from 170.9 per 100,000 women in 2018/2019 to 159.7 in 2020 and increased to 169.2 in 2021. This decrease resulted from a lower incidence around April 2020 and was also observed for non-invasive BC. In 2021, incidence of invasive BC was still decreased by 8% in women aged 80 + years. Surgical treatment was analyzed in 22,708 BC patients with a pre-operative stage ≤ IIA. The median time to surgery was 33 days in 2018/2019, 32 days in 2020 and 36 days in 2021. The proportion of mastectomies increased from 16.1% in 2018/2019 to 17.1% in 2020 and 17.3% in 2021 (adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (2021 vs. 2018/2019): 1.13 (1.03-1.24)). The adjusted increase was strongest for patients aged 50-59 years (1.34 (1.09-1.64)) and those with high-grade tumors (1.27 (1.07-1.51)). While the early return to pre-pandemic age-standardized BC incidence rates is promising, missed cases have not been caught up until 2021. Furthermore, the decreased incidence in elderly women in 2021 warrants further attention. In early-stage BC, a slightly greater rate of mastectomies was observed, although such a change was not recommended. This result underlines the importance of good communication of adapted treatment guidelines in such exceptional circumstances., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The increasing incidence of breast cancer and disease burden is a significant public health concern. While 30% of breast cancers could be prevented through addressing modifiable risk factors, misconceptions among women about breast cancer risks hamper primary prevention. In the absence of primary prevention, secondary prevention such as mammography increases the early detection of breast cancer and improves health outcomes. However, current population-level screening rates indicate secondary prevention is suboptimal. More effective public health efforts to improve breast cancer prevention are required. Given breast cancer is socially patterned, this work explores how social class impacts women's breast cancer prevention practices. This study uses the concepts of lay epidemiology and candidacy as a mechanism to understand women's breast cancer risk perspectives. It engages Bourdieu's relational social class theory to unpack how women's social, cultural, and structured life contexts shape these perspectives and their considerations regarding primary and secondary prevention., Methods: In this qualitative study 43 Australian midlife women (aged 45-64 years), were interviewed to explore their understandings of breast cancer risks, how they perceived their own risk, and how this shaped their prevention behaviours. A theory-informed thematic analysis applying Bourdieu's concepts of habitus, capital, and fields to understand how women's social class positions shapes risk perspectives and prevention practices was conducted., Results: This social class analysis showed differences in how women engage in breast cancer discourse, consider risks, and participate in breast cancer prevention. Middle-class women prioritise health promoting practices and were more likely than working-class and affluent women to attend mammography screening. Working-class women experience structural factors, like low income, stress and difficult life circumstances, which hamper primary prevention practices and for some screening is not considered or prioritised, and their decisions not to screen are less active. Affluent women often do not consider themselves at-risk due to their healthier 'lifestyles. 'They suggest that this, and their knowledge of screening benefits and harms allows them to make informed decisions not to screen., Conclusions: Women interpret and understand breast cancer risks differently and enact prevention practices within the parameters afforded by their social class positions. These findings are useful to inform improved public health approaches regarding both modifiable breast cancer risks and increasing mammography screening. To improve equity in breast cancer prevention efforts, such approaches must respond to limitations based on social class and address structural factors that impact prevention practices., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Breast cancer is ranked among the most prevalent malignancies in the Chinese female population. However, comprehensive reports detailing the latest epidemiological data and attributable disease burden have not been extensively documented., Methods: In 2018, high-quality cancer surveillance data were recorded in 700 population-based cancer registries in China. We extracted data on female breast cancers (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision [ICD-10]: C50) and estimated the incidence and mortality in 2022 according to the baseline data and corresponding trends from 2010 to 2018. Pathological types were classified according to the ICD for Oncology, 3rd Edition codes. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were calculated as the sum of the years of life lost (YLLs) and years lived with disability (YLDs)., Results: In 2022, approximately 357,200 new female breast cancer cases and 75,000 deaths occurred in China, accounting for 15.59% and 7.94% of total new cancer cases and deaths, respectively. The age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) was 33.04 per 100,000. When analyzed by pathological type, the ASIRs for papillary neoplasms, invasive breast carcinoma, rare and salivary gland-type tumors, and other types were 1.13, 29.79, 0.24, and 1.88 per 100,000, respectively. The age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR) was 6.10 per 100,000. A total of 2,628,000 DALYs were found to be attributable to female breast cancer in China, comprising 2,278,300 YLLs and 349,700 YLDs. The ASIR, ASMR, and age-standardized rate (ASR) for DALYs in urban areas were consistently higher than those in rural areas. We observed a four-fold increase in the ASIR and ASR for DALYs and an eight-fold increase in the ASMR among females over 55 years compared with those aged under 55 years., Conclusion: These data provide invaluable insights into the latest epidemiology of female breast cancer in China and highlight the urgency for disease prevention and control strategy formulation., (Copyright © 2024 The Chinese Medical Association, produced by Wolters Kluwer, Inc. under the CC-BY-NC-ND license.)

Observational studies have consistently shown a correlation between breast cancer (BC) and endometrial cancer (EC). Despite these findings, the causal relationship between these cancers has not been clearly defined. This research employed a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization to explore the genetic causality between BC and EC. Genetic instruments for BC were derived from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium genome-wide association studies summary statistics, while for EC, data were sourced from the Endometrial Cancer Association Consortium, the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium, and the UK Biobank. The primary analytical method was inverse-variance weighted. Additional analyses, such as MR-Egger and weighted median, were conducted to validate the robustness of our findings from multiple perspectives. The MR-Egger intercept test was conducted to examine potential pleiotropy, whereas Cochrane Q test was implemented to assess heterogeneity. A leave-one-out analysis was conducted to assess the sensitivity of the observed association. Our analysis identified a bidirectional genetic causal relationship between estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (ER+BC) and EC. Inverse-variance weighted analysis indicated an odds ratio of 1.0686 (95% confidence interval: 1.0029-1.1386, P = .0403) from ER+BC to EC and an odds ratio of 1.0692 (95% confidence interval: 1.0183-1.1225, P = .0071) from EC to ER+BC. No significant horizontal pleiotropy was detected. This study confirms a bidirectional genetic link between ER+BC and EC, suggesting shared genetic etiologies and possibly linked pathophysiological pathways. Understanding the genetic interplay between ER+BC and EC can enhance strategies for the precise prevention and screening of these prevalent cancers, potentially leading to improved clinical outcomes and management of secondary primary malignancies., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Breast cancer (BC) rates have been increasing in young women in the U.S. Alcohol is an established risk factor for breast cancer and has been consistently associated with hormone receptor positive cancers, the type of breast cancer that has been increasing the fastest in young women. Given these trends, we conducted an ecological study to examine whether alcohol consumption, and specifically binge drinking trends, were correlated with female breast cancer diagnosed under 40 years of age using breast cancer data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Cancer Registry. We accounted for a latent period before cancer diagnosis by using exposure 10 years before the outcome (lag model); we also conducted a separate cumulative analysis of 10-year aggregate exposure., Findings: Moderate (Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) = 1.05, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.02-1.07) and heavy (IRR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.02-1.07)(≥ 1 and ≥ 2 drinks/day, respectively) alcohol consumption were each associated with Luminal A breast cancer but not the other molecular subtypes. Binge drinking was associated with an increased rate of early-onset Luminal A BC in both the 10-year lag model (IRR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.11) and the cumulative model (IRR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.02-1.07). Binge drinking was also associated with early-onset Luminal B BC in the cumulative model (IRR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.01-1.07), but not associated with ERBB2-enriched or triple negative early-onset BC in either model., Conclusion: These trends support the hypothesis that one reason for the increase in early-onset breast cancer is from increased alcohol intake including binge drinking., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) plays a crucial role in regulating one-carbon metabolism. Polymorphisms within the MTHFR gene have been found to increase the risk of breast cancer in different populations. In this study, we evaluated the association of polymorphisms of the MTHFR gene (rs1801133 and rs1801131) with the risk of breast cancer in the Bangladeshi population. This case‒control study included 202 breast cancer patients and 104 healthy controls. After the organic extraction of DNA, genotyping was performed via the PCR-RFLP method. Sanger sequencing was performed to validate the RFLP data. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the associations of the polymorphisms. Different computational tools were used to predict the structural and functional consequences of the SNPs. Our study revealed that the MTHFR gene polymorphism rs1801131 is associated with an increased risk of developing breast cancer (p < 0.001, OR = 3.85, 95% CI = 2.06-7.25 for the AC genotype and p < 0.001, OR = 7.82, 95% CI = 2.69-22.05 for the CC genotype). An association was also observed in the dominant model (AC + CC) (p < 0.001, OR = 4.19, 95% CI = 2.28-7.78). For rs1801131, premenopausal status was significantly associated with breast cancer risk (p < 0.001). For rs1801133, no significant association was found with breast cancer risk (p > 0.05, OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 0.90-2.74 for the CT genotype; p > 0.05, OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 0.36-4.92 for the TT genotype). Computational analyses predicted rs1801131 to be tolerated and rs1801133 to be deleterious. Structural analyses demonstrated no significant changes in protein structure but revealed alterations in neighboring interactions according to both bond distances and angles. In conclusion, rs1801131 but not rs1801133 is significantly associated with breast cancer risk in the Bangladeshi population. Moreover, in silico analyses demonstrated changes in the interaction pattern of polymorphic residues with adjacent amino acids., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Breast cancer is the most common cause of cancer death and is a frequently diagnosed cancer among women worldwide. It is becoming a challenging health condition in Ethiopia with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. The main aim of this study was to model the time to death in breast cancer patients at Hiwot Fana Specialized University Hospital. A retrospective cohort study was carried out from April 1st, 2020, to April 1st, 2023, and 296 women were included in the study. We used nonparametric methods and Bayesian accelerated failure time models (with Laplace approximation) to identify risk factors and choose a model fitting breast cancer patient data. Model comparison was performed using the marginal likelihood, deviance information criterion and Watanabe Akaike information criterion. From the total of 296 patients in the study, 56 (18.9%) died. The estimated median survival time was 33 months. The log-rank test showed that age group, stage, alcohol consumption, smoking habit, and comorbidity were potential risk factors associated with the time to death in breast cancer patients at the 5% level of significance. The Bayesian Weibull accelerated failure time model was found to be the best fitted model for predicting the survival time of patients with minimum DIC (520.39) and WAIC (521.59) values. The final Bayesian Weibull AFT model with the integrated nested Laplace approximation estimation technique revealed that age group, stage, alcohol consumption, smoking habit, and comorbidity were significantly associated with the time to death in breast cancer patients. Individuals older than 65 years, with stage IV disease, drinking alcohol, smoking cigarettes and having comorbidities had shortened survival times in patients with breast cancer. Hence, Hiwot Fana Specialized University Hospital and related bodies should work on awareness creation to reduce smoking habits and alcohol use as well as give due attention to elderly and stage IV breast cancer patients during intervention., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Divergent trends of breast cancer incidence by subtype have been reported in the United States and elsewhere; however, it remains unknown whether this trend has continued until the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using high-quality population-based cancer registry data, representing 83% of the US population, this study examined breast cancer incidence rates by estrogen receptor (ER) status in women aged 20-84 years from 2004 to 2020. The incidence rate of ER-positive cancer increased by 1.75% per year from 2004 to 2009 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.26%-3.15%) and has slowed to a 0.87% annual increase (95% CI = 0.41%-1.03%) from 2009 to 2019, followed by a 10.2% reduction from 2019 to 2020. Trends were generally similar across race and ethnicity, although young women (20-49 years), Asian or Pacific Islander, and Hispanic women experienced steady increases until 2019. The incidence rate of ER-negative cancer decreased by 3.13% annually (95% CI = -4.2% to -2.55%) from 2004 to 2012, and the decrease stabilized from 2012 to 2019 (annual percent change: 0.55%; 95% CI = -1.30% to 0.92%), followed by a 6.0% reduction from 2019 to 2020, with trends generally consistent by age and across racial and ethnic groups. The stabilization of the steep decline in ER-negative cancer suggests a departure from the encouraging trajectories projected in earlier studies. Coupled with the deceleration in the rise of ER-positive cancer, the latest trend signals a potential stabilization in the previous rise of the proportional burden of ER-positive cancer. Understanding the impact of the pandemic on each subtype of breast cancer individually may provide a more comprehensive insight into its long-term sequelae on survival and mortality., (© 2024 UICC.)

Extensive research supports an evidence-base for cancer treatment-related risk factors, including extent of lymph node dissection and use of radiotherapy, as contributing to secondary lymphedema. Additionally, comorbidities, such as higher body mass index, and vascular-related conditions are identified to further augment risk. While social determinants of health (SDOH) and socioeconomic factors are widely regarded as influencing an individual's healthcare outcomes, including cancer risk and survival, these factors have not been explored as risk factors for developing secondary lymphedema. A rapid literature review explored the current evidence for SDOH as risk factors for lymphedema. Studies that were published over the last 10 years and that specifically analyzed social factors as variables associated with lymphedema were included. Studies that only characterized the social determinants of the study population were not included. Forty-nine studies were identified through a rapid literature review, and 13 studies that expressly analyzed social determinants as risk factors for secondary lymphedema were reviewed and extracted. All studies were conducted in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Social risk factors included race, educational level, insurance type, and income level. These are consistent with the socioeconomic inequalities related to cancer survival. SDOH may influence the risk of developing cancer treatment-related health conditions like secondary lymphedema. Research trials studying cancer treatment-related conditions should collect consistent and robust data across social, behavioral, environmental, and economic domains and should analyze these variables to understand their contribution to study endpoints. Risk prediction modeling could be a future pathway to better incorporate social determinants, along with medical and co-morbidity data, to holistically understand lymphedema risk., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)