Search

Background: Silicone breast implant design has evolved over the last 50 years. Regulatory bodies including the FDA require data to support the modifications designed to improve the safety, efficacy, longevity, and biocompatibility of breast implants., Objectives: The authors reviewed the 3-year data on the safety and effectiveness of Motiva (Establishment Labs Holdings, Inc., Alajuela, Costa Rica) SmoothSilk silicone gel-filled breast implants submitted to the FDA. The current submitted data include the primary breast augmentation and revisional augmentation cohorts., Methods: The Motiva IDE is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, 10-year pivotal study in which data are collected on breast augmentation, reconstruction, and revisional surgery. Three-year data were submitted to the FDA on adverse events, reoperations, patient and physician satisfaction, connective tissue diseases, and quality of life validated instruments. A subset of the patients underwent annual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at years 1, 2, and 3 to screen for implant rupture., Results: A total of 451 patients were implanted in the primary augmentation cohort and 109 patients in the revisional augmentation cohort. There were 218 patients enrolled in the MRI cohort. Reported rates for reoperation for any reason were 6.1% in the primary augmentation cohort (92.4% follow-up) and 25.8% in the revisional augmentation cohort (88.7% follow-up)., Discussion: Motiva implants were first introduced in 2010. The 3-year Motiva data suggests that the leading cause of revisional surgery has shifted from capsular contracture and rupture to more subjective indications for reoperation such as malposition and size change., Conclusions: Three-year data from the primary augmentation and revisional augmentation cohorts submitted to the FDA demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the Motiva implants. There were low complication rates for implant-related complications and high surgeon and patient satisfaction., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Aesthetic Society.)

Background: Cosmetic breast surgeries such as augmentation, mastopexy, and reduction are common aesthetic medical procedures for enhancing physical appearance. Despite their popularity, the influence of these surgeries on subsequent breast reconstruction for cancer patients remains underexplored., Objectives: In this study we sought to investigate the effects of previous cosmetic breast surgeries on the outcomes of breast reconstruction., Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted from January 2011 to May 2023. This analysis compared patients with histories of implant augmentation, breast reduction, mastopexy, and augmentation mastopexy with those receiving reconstruction without any cosmetic surgery history. Demographics, comorbidities, complications, revisions, and BREAST-Q surveys were collected. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS, with significance set at P < .05., Results: The study included 124 patients (50 autologous, 74 implant) with a history of cosmetic breast surgery (102 implant augmentations, 17 breast reductions, 5 mastopexies, and 9 augmentation mastopexies). They were analyzed in comparison with 1307 patients (683 autologous, 624 implant) without previous cosmetic breast surgery. Patients with previous cosmetic surgeries showed a higher incidence of hematoma with tissue expander placement. A preference for implant-based reconstruction was more common among patients with an augmentation history (P < .001), whereas autologous reconstruction was more common in those with a history of breast reduction (P = .047). Patients with a history of breast augmentation had on average significantly more breast revisions (P < .05)., Conclusions: In this study we demonstrate a significantly higher hematoma rate and number of revisions in patients with previous cosmetic breast surgery when compared to patients without a history of cosmetic surgery. Furthermore, we suggest that types of cosmetic breast surgery influence the decision-making process regarding implant vs autologous reconstruction., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Aesthetic Society. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) with direct to implant (DTI) is the preferred method of reconstruction by many surgeons and patients, however, acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and other synthetic meshes are expensive especially in low- and middle-income countries. AIM OF THE WORK: To evaluate the technique, indications, aesthetic outcomes, and short and long-term complications of DTI breast reconstruction performed with Ultrapro®, a low-cost alternative mesh to ADM and other synthetic meshes., Methods: Our study is a prospective cohort study that was conducted on 133 patients who experienced IBR following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) or skin sparing mastectomy (SSM) using silicone implants and Ultrapro® mesh between December 2020 and December 2023. Techniques used were either sub-pectoral or pre-pectoral, evaluating aesthetic outcome, complication rate and patient satisfaction using breast Q questionnaire., Results: We included 133 patients (141 breasts) with a median age of 39 years. Mean duration of follow up: 20.364 ± 5.39 months. The sub-pectoral and the pre pectoral techniques were used for 80 breasts and 61 breasts respectively. We used the Ultrapro® mesh in all our patients. Smooth round silicone implants were used. The overall Major complications rate was 16.3%. 8 implants (5.7%) were lost within 6 months post-operatively while 2 implants were removed in the late post-operative period (after 6 months) one due to rupture and the other due to local recurrence. Capsular contracture Baker 3 and 4 was observed in 36 breasts (25%), 31 of them had post mastectomy radiotherapy treatment. 11 (7.8%) were managed by capsulotomies and re-insertion of the same implant. Radiotherapy was a significant risk factors for major complications and capsular contracture with p value of (0.01) and (0.0001) respectively., Conclusion: DTI in properly selected patients offers excellent outcomes and patient satisfaction. The complication rate is low and improves with the experience of the surgeon. The Ultrapro® mesh is a safe, low-cost alternative to ADM or other synthetic meshes especially in low socioeconomic countries. Radiotherapy is a significant risk factor for major complications and capsular contractures., Competing Interests: Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Ethical approval was obtained from Baheya Research Ethics committee (BEC) at Baheya Center for Early Detection and Treatment of Breast Cancer in Egypt. Baheya IRB protocol number: 202006030013. Consent for publication All patients provided signed written informed consent for publication. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: During the height of the recent Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, several surgeries were transitioned to ambulatory surgery centers to reserve inpatient resources and reduce transmission risks. Our study evaluated the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent prepectoral breast reconstruction in the operating rooms of two full-service main hospitals versus their associated surgery centers., Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients who underwent immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction at a single hospital between 2018 and 2022. Eligible patients had at least 3 months of post-expander follow-up, with the majority also having 3 months of post-implant follow-up. Patient demographics, reconstructive characteristics, post-expander outcomes, and post-implant outcomes were evaluated between the surgery center and main operating room using the chi-squared (or Fisher's exact) and Wilcoxon ranked-sum tests., Results: This study included 301 patients, outcomes of 509 post-expander breasts, and outcomes of 410 post-implant breasts. The patient characteristics were similar with the only significant difference being the hospital length of stay (increased stay at the main hospital). There were no statistically significant differences in any of the surgical outcomes between the two groups in the post-expander or post-implant period., Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted elective procedures, prompting a shift toward outpatient surgery to optimize hospital resources and reduce inpatient exposure risks. Although breast reconstruction is elective, delays can pose risks for patients with cancer. Our results show that surgical outcomes for prepectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction remain consistent whether performed in outpatient surgical centers or main hospitals., (Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The relationship between perioperative temperatures and postoperative pain is unknown. The present study investigated the relationship of intraoperative hypothermia and perioperative opioid requirements after immediate implant-based breast reconstruction., Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients undergoing immediate implant-based breast reconstruction from 2019-2023. Patients were classified into the hypothermic group (majority of procedure <36.0 °C) or normothermic group (majority of procedure ≥36.0 °C). Cumulative inpatient opioid requirements (morphine milli-equivalents [MMEs]) and frequency of patients requiring "high-dose opioids" (≥100 MMEs) were collected and compared between the groups., Results: In total, 536 patients (835 breasts) were included, among whom 135 (25.1%) were hypothermic. The hypothermic group had lower mean intraoperative (88.4 vs. 99.1 MMEs, P = 0.007) and postoperative (45.6 vs. 56.8 MMEs, P = 0.006) than the normothermic group. Mean (B = 14.6, P = 0.004) and nadir (B = 10.4, P = 0.038) intraoperative temperatures directly predicted higher opioid requirements while higher percentages of the procedure time spent under 36 °C (B = -27.6, P = 0.004) predicted lower opioid requirements. The hypothermic group was associated with 66% decreased odds of requiring high-dose opioids after adjusting for differences in patient and operative characteristics (P = 0.007)., Conclusion: Hypothermia is associated with decreased perioperative opioid requirements. Future studies should further investigate ideal temperature thresholds for warming protocols to minimize postoperative pain., (Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Silicone breast implants are widely prevalent. An increasing group of patients detail self-reported somatic and psychological symptoms that have been ascribed as breast implant illness (BII) and seek capsulectomy and implant removal. To guide consultations and shared decision making, more outcome data relating to this intervention are required., Aim: To present a multicentre study of patient-centred (n = 100) outcome data, following total capsulectomy with implant removal for BII., Method: A questionnaire survey was cross-referenced with medical records. Collected data included demographics, operation details, pre- and postoperative symptom scores, overall self-perceived percentage improvement in BII symptoms and breast shape satisfaction ratings after explantation., Results: The 10 most frequently self-reported symptoms were fatigue (81%), pains/aches (72%), brain/memory fog (56%), mood disturbances (36%), neuropathic pain (28%), hair loss (28%), headaches (25%), gastric symptoms/intolerances (24%), eczema/rash (18%) and vision disturbance (17%). A high proportion of patients (98%) experienced a 62 ± 4% average symptom improvement; most self-reported symptoms (21/28) improved significantly after explantation with total capsulectomy (p < 0.05). Furthermore, patients had high overall self-perceived BII percentage improvement (76 ± 3%) and satisfaction with breast shape numerical rating score (8 ± 0.30) postoperatively., Conclusion: Despite BII not being a defined disease entity, symptom association with silicone breast implants continues for a growing number of patients. It is important to recognise that in this patient group, capsulectomy and implant removal may not be curative, however we have demonstrated that symptom improvement can occur. It is very difficult to prove a causal link between breast implants and BII; to do so will require extensive prospective data collection., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Capsular contracture after implant-based breast reconstruction is not an uncommon problem and affects reconstruction outcomes. It can be influenced by various factors, such as the plane of implant placement, implant surface and implant type. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate how the abovementioned risk factors can affect capsular contracture rates., Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. PubMed MEDLINE, EMBASE (OvidSP) and Cochrane Library were searched. Comparison groups included subpectoral versus prepectoral implant placement, smooth versus textured implants and saline versus silicone implants. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for capsular contracture for each group. The level of evidence was evaluated using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine., Results: Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen studies compared subpectoral versus prepectoral implant placement, with no statistically significant differences in capsular contracture rates [OR, 1.21; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.75-1.95; P = 0.44]. Five studies compared smooth versus textured implants, with no statistically significant differences in capsular contracture rates (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.50-1.93; P = 0.97). Two studies compared saline versus silicone implants for capsular contracture. Patients receiving saline implants had significantly lower capsular contracture rates than silicone implants (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.08-0.43; P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: Implant-based breast reconstruction using saline implants demonstrated reduced capsular contracture rates compared to silicone implants. However, no significant differences were observed in capsular contracture rates between subpectoral versus prepectoral implant placement and smooth versus textured implants., (Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) is being increasingly performed with implant placed above the pectoral muscle (pre-pectoral), instead of below the pectoral muscle (sub-pectoral). Currently, there is a lack of comparative data on clinical and patient-perceived outcomes between pre- vs. sub-pectoral IBR. We investigated whether this difference in surgical approach influenced clinical or patient-perceived outcomes., Methods: This prospective non-randomised longitudinal cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04842240) recruited patients undergoing immediate IBR at the Leeds Breast Unit (Sep 2019-Sep 2021). Data collection included patient characteristics and post-operative complications. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures were collected using the BREAST-Q questionnaire at baseline, 2 weeks, 3- and 12-months post-surgery., Results: Seventy-eight patients underwent IBR (46 patients pre-pectoral; 59% vs. 32 patients sub-pectoral; 41%). Similar complication rates were observed (15.2% pre-pectoral vs. 9.4% sub-pectoral; p = 0.44). Overall implant loss rate was 3.8% (6.5% pre-pectoral vs. 0% sub-pectoral; p = 0.13). Respective median Breast-Q scores for pre- and sub-pectoral IBR at 3 months were: breast satisfaction (58 vs. 48; p = 0.01), psychosocial well-being (60 vs. 57; p = 0.9), physical well-being (68 vs. 76; p = 0.53), and Animation Q scores (73 vs. 76; p = 0.45). Respective Breast-Q scores at 12 months were: breast satisfaction (58 vs. 53; p = 0.3), psychosocial well-being (59 vs. 60; p = 0.9), physical well-being (68 vs. 78; p = 0.18), and Animation Q scores (69 vs. 73; p = 0.4)., Conclusions: This study demonstrates equivalent clinical and patient-perceived outcomes between pre- and sub-pectoral IBR. The study findings can be utilised to aid informed decision making regarding either surgical option., (© 2024. Crown.)

Background: This study explored the surgical management and reconstruction options for augmented breasts in the context of breast conservation therapy (BCT) for breast cancer. The authors hypothesized that there would be no difference in the rates of complications, revisions, or patient satisfaction in patients who maintained their breast augmentation versus those who had their implants removed in the context of BCT., Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective review of 142 patients who underwent BCT at a single center from March of 2016 to March of 2022. The study included patients who had a preexistent cosmetic augmentation at the time of breast cancer diagnosis and BCT. Patient demographics, clinical and treatment characteristics, breast implant details, reconstructive technique, complications, and revisions were recorded. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the BREAST-Q BCT module., Results: Ninety-three patients (65.5%) chose to maintain their implants, whereas 49 (34.5%) elected to have them removed during BCT. Patients with submuscular implants were more likely to maintain their implants. Oncoplastic mastopexy was associated with higher complication rates, particularly in patients opting for implant downsizing. However, multivariate logistic regression did not identify implant management strategy as an independent predictor for complications or revisions. Surgical-site infection was the only predictor of implant explantation. Patient-reported outcomes did not differ significantly between the different implant management cohorts., Conclusions: This study demonstrates that maintaining breast implants during BCT does not increase the risk of complications or revisions. Overall, BCT in augmented women was found to be a safe approach, with high patient satisfaction., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Risk, III., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: The difficulty in obtaining long-term data with the use of breast implants is well known. The majority of available data are from multicenter studies with different surgical techniques, and different implants., Methods: The authors provide retrospective 10-year study data (2001 to 2011) with Mentor Contour Profile Gel implants after a mean of 13 years of follow-up, in the first single-center study of such size and length. This study included 835 patients with 1674 Mentor implants across 6 surgery types, all of them performed with a consistent surgical technique developed by the senior author (J.L.M.Y.). Long-term complication rates were analyzed. For the safety analysis, Kaplan-Meier risk rates were calculated., Results: A total of 85% of the patients had long-term follow-up data (at least 7 years). The overall complication rate was 13.2%. The reoperation rate was 12.3%, being just 6.2% caused by complications. The 21-year Kaplan Meier cumulative incidence rate was 1.7% for capsular contracture and 5.1% for implant rupture. The periareolar approach and having a previous capsular contracture were found to be risk factors to develop a new capsular contracture. Low-height, high-projected implants had a significant higher risk of implant rotation. No breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma or breast implant illness cases were found; 89.2% of the patients reported being satisfied or very satisfied with the surgery and the implant., Conclusion: With a consistent surgical technique, these 21-year follow-up data of the Mentor Contour Profile Gel implants reaffirm the very strong safety profile of these implants, and continued patient satisfaction with them., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, IV., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: Ptosis recurrence often leads to unsatisfactory results after mastopexy, even more so when additional stress is provided by implants on compromised native tissue. The poly-4-hydroxybutyrate(P4HB) scaffold (GalaFLEX) with its favorable safety profile and proven long-term mechanical strength represents a preferred option for soft tissue support., Objectives: The primary endpoint was assessment of lower pole stretch from the early postoperative period up to 3 years., Methods: Out of 151 patients who underwent surgery by G.B. from March 2020 to December 2023, a total of 72 with a 12-month-mininum follow-up who had primary (46) or secondary (26) augmentation mastopexy with subfascial round smooth implants and P4HB scaffold support were included in the study. Three-dimensional artificial intelligence software was utilized for all measurements. Further analysis included evaluation of ptosis recurrence and all complications., Results: No recurrent ptosis, bottoming out, implant displacement, or capsular contracture was reported during follow-up (mean, 24.8 months). The lower pole arch's elongation was 8.04% and 9.44% at 1 and 3 years respectively, comparing favorably with previous reports. Statistically significant correlation (P < .05) between implant size and lower pole stretch was noted, this being greater for larger implants (> 400 cc; P = .0011) and primary cases (P = .1376). Progressive volume redistribution from upper to lower pole was observed in the first year, with substantial stability thereafter., Conclusions: This is the largest published series reporting long-term results (up to 45 months) in mastopexy augmentation with GalaFLEX, suggesting its supportive role in lower pole stability even in the setting of concurrent breast augmentation with smooth implants in a subfascial plane., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Aesthetic Society. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background and Objectives : Breast cancer in patients with prior breast augmentation poses unique challenges for detection, diagnosis, and management. Mastectomy rates are increasing, and patients with prior augmentation often have a lower body mass index, making autologous techniques unsuitable. This study aims to assess the best reconstructive option in patients with a history of subglandular or dual-plane breast augmentation. Materials and methods : A prospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Patients with subglandular or dual-plane breast augmentation were included. Patients were divided into submuscular breast reconstruction (Group 2) or prepectoral breast reconstruction (Group 1) groups. Demographic and surgical data were collected. Results : A total of 47 patients were included, with 23 in Group 1 and 24 in Group 2. Complications occurred in 11 patients (23.4%), with significant differences between groups. The most common complication was seroma formation. Implant loss occurred in 4.3% of cases in Group 1, while no implant loss was observed in Group 2. Patient-reported satisfaction scores were similar between groups at 12 months postoperatively. Conclusions : Subpectoral breast reconstruction with a tissue expander seems a safer and effective technique for patients with prior breast augmentation. It resulted in fewer complications. This approach should be considered as an option for breast reconstruction after mastectomy in this cohort of patients.

Background: Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has become popular in various reconstructive procedures of different anatomic regions. There are different needs depending on the clinical application, including breast, abdominal wall, and any other soft-tissue reconstruction. Removal of the basement membrane, which consists of collagen fibers, may help achieve natural and soft breast reconstruction, which requires highly elastic ADMs. Given the lack of knowledge of the effectiveness of ADM without the basement membrane, the authors compared the clinical outcomes of ADMs with and without basement membrane in breast reconstruction., Methods: The authors conducted a single-blind randomized controlled trial to evaluate differences in clinical outcomes. The patients were randomized into 2 groups: ADM with or without basement membrane. Both groups underwent immediate prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Demographic characteristics, surgical outcomes, and breast shape change using nipple position were compared between the 2 groups., Results: A total of 56 patients were divided into 2 groups: ADM with basement membrane (n = 30 [53.6%]) or ADM without basement membrane (n = 26 [46.4%]). Clinical and surgical characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. The authors detected no statistically significant differences in the overall rate of complications or breast shape change between the 2 groups. However, the rate of seromas was higher in the ADM with basement membrane group than in the ADM without basement membrane group (10% versus 0%; P = 0.09)., Conclusions: The 2 groups showed similar surgical outcomes. ADM without basement membrane in implant-based breast reconstruction was safe, and had mechanical properties of lower tensile strength and higher elasticity., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, II., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Introduction: Indocyanine green (ICG) angiography for the intraoperative evaluation of tissue perfusion is commonly used in implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR). The assessment of ICG images depends on the surgeon's interpretation and is qualitative or semiqualitative in nature. To quantify ICG metrics, this study aimed to apply a novel assessment of fill-rate dynamics to predict wound-healing complications and provide pragmatic assessment tools in IBR., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent IBR with ICG using the photodynamic eye (PDE-Neo II) qualitative imaging system between April 2021 and September 2023. ICG recordings were reviewed to quantify the relative surface area and fluorescence intensity of visual perfusion deficits using ImageJ. The primary outcome was the incidence of wound-healing complications. t-tests and logistic regression were performed for statistical testing., Results: A total of 112 patients (201 breasts) were included. The incidence of wound-healing complications was 12.9%. A higher relative surface area of ischemic regions was significantly associated with wound-healing complications (3.3% vs. 0.90%; p = 0.001). The rate of change in the surface area of ischemic regions was significantly associated with wound-healing complications (0.35% per second vs. 1.29% per second; p = 0.003%). On average, the duration of transient ischemic areas was significantly longer in breasts with wound-healing complications (46.0 s vs. 36.0 s, p = 0.01)., Conclusion: A transient ischemic area of > 5% of the breast and/or failure to resolve transient ischemic areas after 60 s may predict wound-healing complications and inform surgical reconstructive decision-making in IBR., (Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: The inframammary fold (IMF) is an important landmark in breast aesthetic surgery. In augmentation mastopexy procedures, secure and accurate placement of the IMF is essential to aesthetic outcomes and to allow the new IMF to heal in the correct position without displacement. The authors present a simple and efficient four-layer wound closure technique using barbed sutures for closure of the repositioned IMF in augmentation mastopexy procedures. This method was previously described by the first author for reset of the IMF in breast augmentation surgery and has been adapted to the longer IMF incision in augmentation mastopexy procedures., Methods: A retrospective review was undertaken of 335 patients who underwent bilateral breast augmentation mastopexy procedures with a Wise pattern technique at a single unit. The newly reset IMF was closed using barbed sutures and a four-layer closure technique., Results: There were no cases of complications related to wound healing or wound dehiscence. One patient required explantation for an infected implant., Conclusion: The four-layer wound closure technique with barbed sutures provides a quick and efficient method for accurate closure of the newly reset IMF, with positive outcomes related to wound healing. Secure and accurate placement of the inframammary fold is crucial in augmentation mastopexy procedures. The use of a four-layer wound closure technique with barbed sutures provides an efficient method for accurate closure of the newly reset inframammary fold. This method was previously described by the first author for reset of the IMF in breast augmentation surgery and has been adapted to the longer IMF incision in augmentation mastopexy procedures., Level of Evidence V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 ., (© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.)

Hypothyroidism has high prevalence in elderly women, which overlaps with the patient population who opt for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. While hypothyroidism was shown to impact outcomes in other surgeries, its effect on breast reconstruction has not been established. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of patients with and without hypothyroidism who underwent autologous (ABR) and implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR), respectively. Patients having ABR or IBR were identified in the National Inpatient Sample from Q4 2015-2020. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to compare in-hospital outcomes between patients with and without hypothyroidism, adjusted for demographics, socioeconomic status, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. There were 12,765 patients underwent ABR, where 1591 (12.46%) of them had hypothyroidism, while 17,670 patients had IBR with 1,984 (11.23%) having hypothyroidism. Hypothyroid patients had a higher risk of hemorrhage/hematoma (aOR = 1.254, 95 CI 1.079-1.457, p < 0.01) after ABR. However, there were no differences in terms of mortality and organ system complications, nor wound dehiscence, superficial/deep wound complications, seroma, flap revision, excessive scarring, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, vascular complications, infection, sepsis, transfer out, length of stay (LOS), nor hospital charge between patients with and without hypothyroidism after ABR. All postoperative outcomes were comparable between hypothyroid patients and controls after IBR. While breast reconstruction is generally safe for hypothyroid patients, preoperative screening for hypothyroidism may be beneficial for those undergoing ABR. In ABR, hypothyroidism correction and blood management may help prevent bleeding complications in hypothyroid patients. Future studies should explore the long-term prognosis of hypothyroid patients after breast reconstruction., (© 2024. Italian Society of Surgery (SIC).)

Introduction: With 60,000 cases per year, breast cancer is the most frequent type of cancer in France, and a quarter of these cases require mastectomy. Following the surgery, breast reconstruction can be indicated. Two of the available techniques are breast implants (BIs) and muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi (MSLD). The aim of this study was to compare postoperative complications of each approach and thus help the surgeon and the patient in making an informed decision before surgery., Materials and Methods: This descriptive, retrospective and single-centre study was conducted in the Croix Rousse hospital in Lyon (France) between 1 July 2018 and 1 July 2023. It included women aged ≥18 years who underwent mastectomy followed by (immediate or delayed) breast reconstruction with MSLD or BI. Complications were recorded and evaluated using the Clavien-Dindo classification., Results: Over the course of the study, 92 patients were managed with MSLD reconstruction and 63 patients with BI. We observed a complication rate of 62% in the BI group and 39% in the MSLD group (odds ratio [OR]=0.16; p < 0.005). Body mass index (BMI) significantly impacted this rate (OR=1.11; p = 0.01), whereas smoking status and diabetes did not. No complication occurred more predominantly than others. A second surgery was required more often in the BI group (p < 0.005). There were no severe complications (>Grade 4)., Conclusion: MSLD predicted fewer complications and was associated with a shorter hospital stay compared with implants, suggesting that it may be a preferable option for breast reconstruction., (Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The goals of mastopexy differ significantly from those of augmentation mammoplasty. Mastopexy is designed to lift and reshape the breasts, while augmentation mammoplasty is designed to increase the volume of the breasts. This conflict causes that one-stage augmentation mastopexies showed a revision rate from 8.7 to 23.2%. The aim of our study is to present some technical refinements for reducing the risk of implant exposure and reoperation., Methods: We designed a retrospective matched cohort study, including 216 consecutive patients, undergone augmentation mastopexy between January 2013 and December 2022. We divided them in two groups: Group A undergone an inverted-T superomedial pedicled augmentation mastopexy and Group B undergone our inverted-T modified augmentation mastopexy. The groups were matched for clinical and surgical variables, with the surgical technique the only difference between the two., Results: Complications were registered in ten patients (9.3%) in Group A (two wound breakdowns at T with implant exposure and eight wound dehiscences), six of which required surgical revision. In contrast, only three patients (2.8%) in Group B reported a complication, which was wound dehiscence without implant exposure in all cases. None of the dehiscence required surgical revision. The difference between complication and revision rates was statistically significant., Conclusions: Separating the implant and the mastopexy dissection planes reduces the implant exposure and the reoperation rate in one-stage augmentation mastopexy., Level of Evidence Iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://link.springer.com/journal/00266 ., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) involves the infusion of a saline solution containing lidocaine and epinephrine into tissues to achieve localized anesthesia and vasoconstriction. While the use of TLA in sub-glandular augmentation mammoplasty has been documented, we present a modified TLA approach for primary sub-muscular breast augmentation in transgender patients based on our experience over the past years., Methods: Between the years 2014 and 2021, we performed primary sub-muscular breast augmentation on 20 transgender patients under TLA and conscious sedation. The tumescent solution consisted of 25 mL of 2% lidocaine, 8 mEq of sodium bicarbonate, and 1 mL of epinephrine (1 mg/1 mL) in 1000 mL of 0.9% saline solution. Initially, the solution was infiltrated between the pectoral fascia and the mammary gland, and subsequently, during the surgery, under the pectoralis major muscle., Results: The average volume of tumescent solution infiltrated during TLA was 740 mL per breast. There were no reports of adrenaline or lidocaine toxicity, and no cases required a conversion to general anesthesia. Patients experienced no pain or discomfort during the preoperative infiltration or surgical procedure. Reoperations due to short-term complications never occurred. We observed a major complication rate of 5%, represented by 1 hematoma. Long-term complications comprised one case of implant dislocation and one occurrence of dystrophic scar formation. No cases of capsular contracture needing reoperation, asymmetry, and implant rupture occurred. In total, one individual (5%) requested larger implants. Follow-up time ranged from 30 days to 1 years., Conclusions: Overall, augmentation mammaplasty is a valuable choice for transgender women aiming to enhance their feminine characteristics and alleviate gender dysphoria. It is imperative for patients to conduct thorough research, grasp the potential pros and cons, and consult experienced healthcare professionals in transgender care. Additionally, tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) has proven to be a safe and efficient method for sub-muscular breast augmentation, providing effective pain control with minimal postoperative complications, resulting in high patient satisfaction., Level of Evidence Iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 ., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Several acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are used for soft-tissue support in prosthetic breast reconstruction. Little high-level evidence supports the use of one ADM over another. The authors sought to compare Cortiva 1-mm Allograft Dermis with AlloDerm RTU (ready to use), the most studied ADM in the literature., Methods: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing Cortiva with AlloDerm in prepectoral and subpectoral immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction was performed at 2 academic hospitals from March of 2017 to December of 2021. Reconstructions were direct to implant (DTI) or tissue expander (TE). Primary outcome was reconstructive failure, defined as TE explantation before planned further reconstruction, or explantation of DTI reconstructions before 3 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were additional complications, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and cost., Results: There were 302 patients included: 151 AlloDerm (280 breasts), 151 Cortiva (277 breasts). The majority of reconstructions in both cohorts consisted of TE (62% versus 38% DTI), smooth device (68% versus 32% textured), and prepectoral (80% versus 20% subpectoral). Reconstructive failure was no different between ADMs (AlloDerm 9.3% versus Cortiva 8.3%; P = 0.68). There were no additional differences in any complications or PROs between ADMs. Seromas occurred in 7.6% of Cortiva but 12% of AlloDerm cases, in which the odds of seroma formation were two-fold higher (odds ratio, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.01 to 3.67]; P = 0.047). AlloDerm variable cost was 10% to 15% more than Cortiva, and there were no additional cost differences., Conclusion: When assessing safety, clinical performance, PROs, and cost, Cortiva is noninferior to AlloDerm in immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction, and may be less expensive, with lower risk of seroma formation., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, I., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Introduction: Post-mastectomy radiation therapy is an important component of adjuvant therapy for high-risk patients. However, radiation to reconstructed breasts can cause various complications. Recently, hypofractionated (HF) protocols have been adopted in several countries. Here, we aimed to assess the impact of HF protocols on implant-reconstructed breasts through a meta-analysis and systematic review of the currently available literature., Methods: Records published until August 2023 were systematically searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases. Keywords included hypofractionation radiotherapy, mastectomy, and breast reconstruction. Studies that utilized HF and conventional fractionation (CF) after prosthetic reconstruction were selected. Due to the rarity of events in outcomes, Mantel-Haenszel's odds ratios were calculated using a fixed-effect model to compare the complication rates between HF and CF groups. For analysis with high heterogeneity, a random effect model was used., Results: Seven articles with 924 implant reconstructions, in which 506 (54.8 %) underwent HF were included. HF patients received 43.8 Gy on average, while CF patients received 51.2 Gy. Mean follow-up ranged from 10.6 to 35 months. Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. HF groups had a significantly lower risk of capsular contracture (OR 0.25, 95 % CI 0.11-0.55), major revision surgery (OR 0.19, 95 % CI 0.05-0.80), and wound dehiscence (OR 0.24, 95 % CI 0.07-0.78) compared to CF groups. The risks of other complications were not statistically significant., Conclusion: This study indicates that HF protocols are associated with fewer complications than CF protocols in implant-reconstructed patients. These findings suggest that the application of HF PMRT in implant-reconstructed patients with breast cancer is plausible., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Breast reconstructive surgery has evolved significantly over the years. One of the recent advancements is the use of prepectoral implants in combination with synthetic and biological material as a natural and effective coverage. To date, there is little published data on breast reconstruction using acellular bovine pericardium matrix and most concern submuscular breast reconstruction. This study aimed to describe the multicentric-multisurgeon experience in performing direct to implant (DTI) prepectoral breast reconstructions using acellular bovine pericardium matrix (ABPM) pocket. A retrospective multicentric data collection of the all the immediate prepectoral breast reconstructions using acellular bovine pericardium was carried out by the authors. Surgical data including type of mastectomy, axillary surgery, type and size of implant, size of ABPM, duration of surgery were collected for each patient. Postoperative data including adjuvant treatments, complications, necessity to perform other interventions, patient's satisfaction were collected. Cosmetic results were also evaluated by 7 different observers at minimum 1 year follow-up. A total of 65 breast reconstruction were included in the study. Mean follow up was 21.3 months. Average surgical time was 1,42 hours. Minor complications occurred in 4 breasts; major complications occurred in 2 breasts. After 6 months follow-up, 7 patients underwent fat grafting to correct any rippling and /or wrinkling. Breast aesthetic and patients reported outcomes were satisfactory. Not significant capsular contracture was noted at the follow up control. To date, this is the largest study about prepectoral breast reconstruction with ABPM. On the basis of our results, prepectoral breast reconstruction ABPM assisted is a reliable, safe and suitable option providing good patient satisfaction outcomes., Competing Interests: Disclosure Prof. De Vita is a temporary consultant for Exashape. The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The use of three-dimensional imaging in breast augmentation with silicone implants has revolutionized the surgery planning process by providing detailed visualizations of expected post-surgical outcomes. This technology enhances the decision-making process, enabling patients to choose their implants with greater confidence and ultimately leading to higher satisfaction with the postoperative outcome., Objective: This study aims to assess the accuracy of 3D imaging simulations using the Canfield Vectra XT 3D system in predicting breast augmentation outcomes in Chinese patients, focusing on volume, surface contour, breast anterior-posterior (AP) Projection, and breast internal angle., Methods: Our study analyzed female patients who received breast augmentation, documenting their preoperative and three-month postoperative conditions with 3D Vectra XT system images. Exclusions were made for patients undergoing concurrent breast surgeries or those with tuberous or ptotic breasts, due to limitations of the imaging system. Implants used were either round textured or anatomically shaped cohesive silicone gel, inserted subpectorally through trans-axillary or inframammary incisions, based on personalized evaluations. A detailed comparison between preoperative simulations and actual postoperative outcomes was conducted, focusing on volume, surface contour, AP projection, and internal angle variations. Statistical significance was determined through paired T tests, P < 0.05., Results: In the analysis of preoperative simulations for determining postoperative outcomes in breast surgery, our study involving 42 Chinese patients, a total of 84 breasts, was conducted. The results indicated a mean volumetric discrepancy of 21.5 ± 10.3 (SD) cubic centimeters between the simulated and actual postoperative outcomes, achieving an accuracy rate of 91.9%. The root mean square deviation for the breast surface geometry was calculated to be 4.5 ± 1.1 (SD) millimeters (mm), demonstrating a low variance between the predicted and observed outcomes. The investigation found no significant variations across any specific areas of the breast surface, highlighting the uniform accuracy of the simulations across the entire breast. Additionally, the mean differences in Anterior-Posterior (AP) projection and internal angle were determined to be 8.82 ± 5.64 mm and 0.48 ± 1.91 (SD) degrees, respectively. These findings collectively attest to the efficacy of preoperative simulations in accurately predicting the postoperative physical appearance of breasts, thereby providing a valuable tool for surgical planning and improving the consultation process for patients., Conclusions: The Canfield Vectra XT 3D system has proven to be remarkably accurate in predicting the volumetric outcomes of breast augmentation surgery, with an accuracy rate exceeding 91.9%. It stands as a valuable tool for surgeons and patients alike, enhancing the preoperative planning process by offering a realistic preview of surgical results. This advancement not only facilitates a deeper understanding and setting of realistic expectations for patients but also strengthens the communication between patients and surgeons, ultimately leading to higher satisfaction rates with the surgical outcomes. It also emphasizes the significance of detailed documentation and consent processes in protecting against legal repercussions., Level of Evidence Ii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 ., (© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.)

Background: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women in the UK. Reconstruction - of which implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is the most common - forms a core part of surgical management of breast cancer. More recently, pre-pectoral IBBR has become common as technology and operative techniques have evolved. Many surgeons use acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in reconstruction however there is little evidence in literature that this improves surgical outcomes. This review will assess available evidence for surgical outcomes for breast reconstructions using ADM versus non-use of ADM., Methods: A database search was performed of Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2012-2022). Studies were screened using inclusion and exclusion criteria. Risk of Bias was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa scale and ROBIS tools. Analysis and meta-analysis were performed., Results: This review included 22 studies (3822 breast reconstructions). No significant difference between overall complications and failure rates between ADM and non-ADM use was demonstrated. Capsular contracture, wound dehiscence and implant rippling had significant differences however these results demonstrated high heterogeneity thus wider generalisation may be inaccurate. Patient quality of life scores were not recorded consistently or comparably between papers., Conclusions: This review suggests a lack of significant differences in most complications between ADM use and non-use for pre-pectoral IBBR. If no increase in complications exists between groups, this has significant implications for surgical and legislative decision-making. There is, however, inadequate evidence available on the topic and further research is required., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Implant malposition is a well-recognized complication of prosthetic breast implants. However, to date, no objective classification system has been described., Objectives: The aim of this study was to perform a prospective trial of an objective and reproducible classification system for implant malposition formulated by analyzing retrospective data from a large cohort of patients with implant malposition., Methods: The authors retrospectively analyzed the degree of medial/lateral and inferior/superior implant malposition relative to their optimal position within the breast footprint in a series of 189 breasts (n = 100 patients). An objective classification system for implant malposition was devised and then applied to a prospective cohort of 53 breasts in 28 patients with implant malposition., Results: The degree of malposition in a single or combination of axes was categorized according to the distance (measured in centimeters) from the ideal breast footprint. The classification system incorporated the axis of malposition and distance to generate a treatment decision-making guide. Cases of Grade 1 malposition did not warrant surgical intervention, whereas surgical correction was warranted in all Grade 3 cases. In the combined patient cohort (n = 242 breasts, 128 patients), lateral, inferior, medial, and superior displacement ranged between Grades 1 and 3. There was no interobserver variability in the grades assigned to 9 out of 10 patients in the prospective group., Conclusions: A simple and reproducible classification system for implant malposition has been created that allows surgeons to objectively record the extent of malposition, guides surgical decision-making, and can be used to document the results of any intervention., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Aesthetic Society. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to determine the long-term satisfaction levels of women who have undergone breast augmentation and augmentation mastopexy procedures, while identifying the factors influencing patient satisfaction., Methods: A self-reported retrospective case study design was used to collect data from women with breast implants. The study employed a survey that included demographic information, preoperative diagnosis, implant details, and patient-reported outcomes measured using the Breast-Q Instrument, which evaluates satisfaction with breasts, self-esteem, sexual well-being, and physical symptoms. Statistical analyses were conducted to identify correlations and differences in outcomes between the different variables., Results: The survey was completed by 1022 women from 19 countries, with Chile, Mexico, and Colombia being the most represented. Augmentation was performed on 72.2% of the patients, while 27.7% underwent augmentation mastopexy. Patient satisfaction with breast size and shape varied significantly between the two procedures, with patients undergoing augmentation mastopexy showing less satisfaction. In addition, patients who were unaware of their implant shape or placement reported lower satisfaction scores. The study also found that patient satisfaction decreased over time in the augmentation mastopexy cases and that patients with high body mass index had lower satisfaction., Conclusion: Augmentation mastopexy in patients with breast ptosis yields lower satisfaction than augmentation alone. Dissatisfaction escalates with overweight/obesity (BMI), post-surgery time, and misinformation. Implant pocket (pre-vs. subpectoral), shape (round vs. anatomical), and size did not impact satisfaction., Level of Evidence Iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 ., (© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.)

Introduction: There has been a rising trend in the use of silicone breast implants for breast reconstructions after breast cancer treatment, as well as in the aesthetic breast procedures. A cluster of non-specific symptoms related to the presence of silicone implant has been called breast implant illness (BII). However, there are no strict criteria of BII which would specifically define this term. The increasing interest in BII among patients and physicians urges verifying own cases of "on-demand" explantations., Material and Methods: In this paper, we discussed a case of a patient with initial BII diagnosis, after breast reconstruction, and reviewed the literature on the BII symptoms and aetiology. A decision for aesthetic revision, not explantation, was made as the diagnosis of BII was questioned, and somatisation due to dissatisfaction with the aesthetic result of breast reconstruction was diagnosed., Results: Improving aesthetics by implant exchange and contralateral mastopexy caused a full recovery from patient's symptoms., Conclusion: Based on our case, we point on the fact that BII diagnosis in patients after breast reconstruction is challenging. We suggest that while considering such a diagnosis and further proceedings, e.g. explantation, especially in patients after breast reconstruction, some exclusion criteria should be considered. Dissatisfaction with the result of the surgery can also lead to somatisation and the presence of real clinical symptoms, which should not be confused with the possible autoimmune reaction to silicone particles., Level of Evidence Iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 ., (© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.)

Breast augmentation procedures using silicone implants have become increasingly popular over the past six decades. This article addresses the concerns of patients regarding implant strength by providing clinicians with valuable information in addition to video and pictorial evidence to share, fostering reassurance. The article focuses on the structural integrity and stability of breast implants, which play a critical role in their long-term performance and patient satisfaction. Specifically, it examines the industry standards outlined by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), with a particular emphasis on ISO14607-2018, which encompasses a range of mechanical and physio-mechanical tests, including the assessment of silicone gel-fill firmness, evaluation of shell integrity, and examination of the impact of environmental conditions on implant performance. Breast implants are not static devices and are subject to aging and fatigue-based degradation. This emphasizes the need for ongoing monitoring and evaluation to ensure the long-term safety and satisfaction of patients. By providing a comprehensive examination of breast implant structure and industry standards, this article equips clinicians with the necessary knowledge to address patient concerns and foster confidence in the safety and longevity of breast augmentation procedures using silicone implants.Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 ., (© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.)

Background: Although mesh-based implant breast reconstruction surgery is emerging as the primary surgical procedure for breast reconstruction, mesh use remains controversial in implant breast reconstruction surgery, especially in terms of how to select the ideal mesh. Our aim is to elaborate relevant prognosis in the mesh-based implant breast reconstruction surgery., Methods: Relevant studies were identified from PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane library searches. Extracted data included study type, basic characteristics, mesh information, complications, etc. We analyzed the included cohort studies and randomized controlled trials that reported mesh-related implant breast reconstruction complications and breast quality scale scores., Results: A total of 32 studies including 7475 subjects were included. The results showed that the overall complication rate was 2.07 times higher in the biological mesh group than in the synthetic mesh group (risk ratio [RR]: 2.07, 95% CI 1.14-3.78). The risk of seroma was 4.50 times higher in the biological mesh group than in the synthetic mesh group (RR: 4.50, 95% CI 2.27-8.95). In terms of comparing breast quality scale scores, the mesh group had scores that were 1.49 (95% CI 0.19-2.78) higher than the non-mesh group for "physical well-being" and 2.05 (95% CI 0.08-4.02) higher for "sexual well-being.", Conclusions: Our study found that the risk of total complications was higher with biological mesh than with synthetic mesh in implant breast reconstruction surgery. Based on short-term cost, healthcare burden, and healthcare benefits, synthetic meshes are superior to biological meshes., Level of Evidence Iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 ., (© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.)

Background: Over the latest 15 years, breast augmentation with implant has been progressively refined technically and artistically. However, little attention is usually given to the intermammary space. The aim of this article is to report author's experience and technique in the safe reduction of the intermammary space in breast augmentation with implants without fat grafting., Patients and Methods: From July 2019 to July 2021, 62 consecutive patients undergoing cosmetic breast enhancement with implant and requesting a reduction of the intermammary space were retrospectively evaluated. Preoperatively, breast features were registered for all patients. Preoperative intermammary distance ranged from 2.3 to 7 cm (5.4 ± 0.74)., Results: The average follow-up time was 20 months (range 12 to 36 months). All implants were anatomical silicon-gel filled implants with micropolyurethane foam shell. No major early and late complications were experienced. The outcomes were graded as excellent in 45 breasts (72.6 %), very good in 15 (24.2%), good in the two cases (3.2%) with minor delayed wound healing (less than 1 cm) which solved conservatively within 1 month. Patients' satisfaction was high to very high. Postoperative intermammary distance was reduced in all cases and ranged from 1 to 4.5 (mean 2.6 ± 0.52 cm) CONCLUSION: The intermammary distance can be safely reduced with implant only in all cases who seek it, both via submuscular and via subfascial approach by a precise medial pocket dissection and implantation of micropolyurethane foam-coated implant, which guarantee device's stability during the healing process avoiding malposition., Level of Evidence Iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 ., (© 2023. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.)

Background: In breast augmentation surgery, selection of the appropriate breast implant size is a crucial step that can greatly affect patient satisfaction and the outcome of the procedure. However, this decision is often based on the subjective judgment of the surgeon and the patient, which can lead to suboptimal results. The authors aimed to develop a machine-learning approach that can accurately predict the size of breast implants selected for breast augmentation surgery., Methods: The authors collected data on patient demographic characteristics, medical history, and surgeon preferences from a sample of 1000 consecutive patients who underwent breast augmentation. This information was used to train and test a supervised machine-learning model to predict the size of breast implant needed., Results: The study demonstrated the effectiveness of the algorithm in predicting breast implant size, achieving a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9335 ( P < 0.001). The model generated accurate predictions in 86% of instances, with a mean absolute error of 27.10 mL. Its effectiveness was confirmed in the reoperation group, in which 36 of 57 patients (63%) would have received a more suitable implant size if the model's suggestion had been followed, potentially avoiding reoperation., Conclusions: The findings show that machine learning can accurately predict the needed size of breast implants in augmentation surgery. By integrating the artificial intelligence model into a decision support system for breast augmentation surgery, essential guidance can be provided to surgeons and patients. This approach not only streamlines the implant selection process but also facilitates enhanced communication and decision-making, ultimately leading to more reliable outcomes and improved patient satisfaction., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and immediate breast reconstruction have demonstrated positive aesthetic outcomes and high patient satisfaction. However, challenges arise when performing NSM on patients with large and ptotic breasts because of the higher risk of nipple-areola complex (NAC) necrosis. This study proposes a new technique: the three pedicle-based nipple-sparing skin-reducing mastectomy (TP-NSSRM), combined with direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction, aimed at reducing complications., Methods: A prospective study was conducted from November of 2021 to April of 2022, enrolling patients with large and drooping breasts requiring mastectomy for breast cancer treatment or risk reduction. Patient selection criteria included a sternal notch-to-nipple distance of greater than or equal to 23 cm, grade 3 ptosis, and eligibility for immediate prepectoral DTI breast reconstruction. Patient satisfaction was assessed using BREAST-Q modules., Results: Seventy-two TP-NSSRM procedures combined with immediate DTI-based breast reconstruction were performed on a total of 45 patients. High patient satisfaction was observed, and statistically significant improvements were noted in postoperative BREAST-Q scores ( P = 0.001). The complication rate was low, and preservation of the nipple-areola complex was achieved in all cases., Conclusions: The TP-NSSRM technique offers a potential solution for patients with large and drooping breasts undergoing NSM. It aims to minimize complications and achieve satisfactory outcomes. This study demonstrates favorable results in terms of patient satisfaction and quality of life. Further research and long-term follow-up are necessary to validate these findings and evaluate the long-term outcomes of this technique., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, IV., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: The authors performed a retrospective review to analyze operative outcomes of breast mound reconstruction after robot-assisted mastectomy., Methods: Patients who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with a robotic device (Da Vinci Xi) and immediate prepectoral prosthetic reconstruction by lateral incision from June of 2018 to July of 2019 were enrolled. Patient characteristics, complications, and satisfaction rates as assessed by BREAST-Q were analyzed. The surgical technique was described in detail., Results: Thirty-nine cases, including 7 bilateral cases (total 46 breasts), underwent robot-assisted NSM followed by immediate prepectoral prosthetic implant reconstruction. The median patient age was 46.63 years (range, 21 to 63 years). The mean operation time for each prepectoral breast mound reconstruction using the direct-to-implant technique was 126.55 minutes. Robot-assisted reconstruction resulted in superior BREAST-Q scores compared with the conventional reconstruction method. Major infection occurred in 7 cases (15.2%), and complete nipple loss occurred in 3 cases (6.6%). Severe complications requiring breast implant removal occurred in 4 breasts (8.7%). Two cases were due to the coexistence of infection and skin necrosis; in 1 case, the skin flap became congested on postoperative day 3 and required additional surgery to change the expander. Other complications were resolved with conservative care or minor revision., Conclusions: This report is the first concerning robot-assisted NSM followed by prepectoral acellular dermal matrix-wrapped prosthetic reconstruction. This procedure was not inferior to other methods. Further prospective research to evaluate oncologic outcomes is warranted., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, IV., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: Transumbilical breast augmentation (TUBA) with saline implants has been considered a safe and efficient technique for decades. However, because silicone implants are more popular than saline ones, TUBA with saline implants is not widely performed. In 2014, we published a report on transumbilical breast augmentation using silicone cohesive gel implants. As we have performed transumbilical silicone breast augmentation (TUSBA) for 13 years with slight modifications, this study aimed to describe this novel technique and present accompanying patient outcomes over 5 years., Methods: We enrolled patients desiring breast augmentation at a single center. The preoperative design was initially determined with the patients in standing positions before they underwent surgery under general anesthesia in a supine position., Results: Between January 2018 and December 2022, 69 women and one man underwent TUSBA at a single center. All patients underwent cohesive gel silicone implantation in the subpectoral pocket. The implant size varied from 225 to 300 mL (average 272 mL) because two patients underwent surgery with implants of different sizes due to breast asymmetry. All patients were satisfied with the surgery outcome except one who was dissatisfied because of abdominal bulging., Conclusions: TUSBA offers advantages such as minimal scarring and unrestricted arm movement; thus, it can be an alternative option for patients seeking breast augmentation., Level of Evidence Iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://www.springer.com/00266 ., (© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.)

Background: Despite high complication rates, patients persistently present for single-stage augmentation mastopexy. In empty, deflated breasts, we perform one-stage augmentation mastopexy; however, in heavy ptotic breasts, our preference is to stage the procedure with mastopexy and fat graft first. With volume from fat grafting focussing on the upper pole and cleavage areas, many of our patients avoid implants altogether. This reduces subsequent risks of waterfall deformity, implant displacement, rupture and a lifetime of implant exchanges., Objectives: We aim to describe our findings and technique for reducing progression to the second stage of a two-stage augmentation mastopexy with the appropriate use of moderate to high volume of fat grafting at the primary operation., Methods: This is a retrospective review of all patients who presented to the senior author (KT) requesting breast implants and requiring mastopexy, from January 2018 to December 2022., Results: Over the five-year period, 137 patients were identified. Seventy-one (51.8%) underwent single-stage augmentation mastopexy, 55 (40.1%) underwent mastopexy with fat grafting and 11 (8.0%) underwent mastopexy with no fat grafting. Our key finding in this study is that 52 of 66 (78.8%) of planned staged patients, who underwent mastopexy with or without fat grafting, were happy with the volume attained and no longer wished to undergo further implant augmentation., Conclusion: In selected patients, appropriate volume and position of fat grafting at the time of primary mastopexy can significantly obviate the need for a second stage implant (alloplastic) augmentation., Level of Evidence V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 ., (© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.)

Summary: In transumbilical breast augmentation (TUBA) with prefilled silicone implants, technical challenges remain to accommodate more implant options and dissection planes. The authors aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of TUBA using various types of prefilled silicone implants (TUSBA) and its applicability for subglandular, subfascial, dual-plane implantation. In the early stage, TUSBA was primarily performed using endoscope-assisted blunt dissection, and later converted to full endoscopy dissection to achieve better results. An endoscope was used to confirm the pocket and check bleeding for both groups. For the endoscope-assisted group, surgical techniques were modified from conventional TUBA. In full endoscopy TUSBA, the entire dissection process was performed under endoscopic monitoring. Preliminary data of patients undergoing TUSBA from June of 2016 to April of 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Breast implants with smooth, textured, or nanotextured surface properties and round or anatomic shapes were used, with sizes up to 500 mL. Seventy-four patients with a mean age of 36.4 years (range, 21 to 55 years) were enrolled in this study. Follow-up ranged from 1 month to 4.5 years (mean, 15.6 months). No excessive postoperative pain in breast or abdomen was reported. Surgery outcomes were aesthetically pleasing in both groups. In the endoscope-assisted group, 3 patients (4.6%) required major revisional procedures. No revision was required in the full-endoscopy group. TUSBA with various types of silicone implants is feasible and accommodable to all dissection planes. The full-endoscopy technique is helpful in reducing the higher complication rate., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, IV., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Infection after implant-based breast reconstruction remains challenging, with infection rates up to 24%. Best clinical practice indicates prophylactic oral antibiotics are ineffective at preventing infection. Absorbable antibiotic beads have been routinely used in other surgical subspecialties such as orthopedic and vascular procedures for continuous local antibiotic delivery to the surgical site when implants are placed. Biodegradable calcium sulfate antibiotic beads have been shown to normalize incidence of infection when used prophylactically for a high-risk prepectoral patient population. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of prophylactic biodegradable antibiotic beads when used non-selectively for all prepectoral immediate tissue expander (TE) reconstruction. Patients who underwent mastectomy and immediate prepectoral TE reconstruction on the same day between 2018 and 2024 were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received antibiotic beads (Group 1) and those who did not (Group 2). Absorbable calcium-sulfate beads were reconstituted with 1 g vancomycin and 240 mg gentamicin. There were 33 patients (63 TEs) in Group 1 and 330 patients (545 TEs) in Group 2. TE loss was present in 1.5% (1/65 TEs) Group 1 compared to 9.4% (51/545 TEs) in Group 2 (p = 0.032). The mean follow-up time was 178 days (range 93-266 days). Prophylactic biodegradable antibiotic beads used during immediate tissue expander reconstruction decreased implant loss rate. There was one occurrence of SSI in the antibiotic bead group. Antibiotic beads may potentially decrease complications in immediate TE reconstruction when used non-selectively for all patients., (Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Textured implants were developed with the goal of reducing rates of capsular contracture and preventing implant malposition (eg, malrotation). Recent evidence has questioned whether textured implants are as resistant to malrotation as previously reported., Methods: Women presenting to a single health care system for removal of textured implants were prospectively enrolled in the study from September of 2019 to July of 2022. Patients who underwent removal of an anatomical, textured implant in the operating room were included in the study; whereas those who did not undergo implant removal, or were found to have a smooth implant, or a round, textured implant, were excluded. The degree of implant rotation on removal of the implant was measured intraoperatively. Information regarding implant-specific factors, patient demographics, clinical factors, and operative characteristics, was collected., Results: A total of 51 patients (80 implants) were included in the study; 45% of implants were malrotated (rotated >30 degrees), and the median degree of rotation was 30 degrees. Having more than one previous revision of the breast pocket was predictive of implant rotation (42 degrees) on multivariate linear regression analysis. Patients who presented with a complaint of "aesthetic dissatisfaction" had 2.89 increased odds of having an implant rotated greater than 30 degrees., Conclusion: The authors' study found a high rate of malrotation of textured shaped implants on explantation., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Risk, III., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Purpose: The use of "mesh" in implant-based reconstruction is widespread, with both acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) and extracellular matrices (ECMs) being used, especially in prepectoral device placement. This study compared Ovitex (ovine ECM) versus human cadaveric ADMs to determine safety profiles and cost-effectiveness., Methods: A single surgeon's longitudinal experience with 2-stage, immediate tissue expander breast reconstruction from 2018 to 2023 was analyzed. Patients with AlloDerm and Cortiva (human ADM) were compared with those receiving Ovitex, and 90-day complications were analyzed by chi-squared and analysis of variance. Costs of each mesh were tabulated based on available market data., Results: Patient demographics were comparable. Of 127 patients, 85 received ovine ECM (163 breasts) and 42 received cadaveric ADM (81 breasts). No significant difference between the groups for complications requiring return to the operating room (12.7% ovine vs 14.8% human (P = 0.31) or minor complications (9.8% ovine vs 7.4% human, P = 0.34). There was no difference between reconstructive success and failure between the 2 groups (P = 0.066). The cost of Ovitex was 24%-38% cheaper than Cortiva and AlloDerm, respectively., Conclusions: In this longitudinal, single-surgeon study of 2 different types of meshes in 2-stage expander implant breast reconstruction, we found ovine multilaminated reinforced extracellular matrix (Ovitex) was comparable in outcomes with human acellular dermal matrices (AlloDerm and Cortiva). Ovine mesh was considerably cheaper. Multiple factors determine which mesh should be chosen for implant breast reconstruction. This study supports the use of Ovitex as a cost-effective substitute for human acellular dermal matrices in implant breast reconstruction., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: The incidence of breast cancer in Pakistan has been rising with approximately one third of these patients requiring mastectomy. Among breast reconstruction treatment options, the use of Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) for pre-pectoral breast implant surgery has proven effective with improved cosmetic outcome. However, due to high cost it cannot be regularly implemented in a developing country like Pakistan. An alternative to ADM, Polyglactin 910 (Vicryl™, Ethicon) mesh has been introduced in pre-pectoral breast reconstructive surgery which has shown to be almost 10 times lower in cost. We set out to determine the frequency of early postoperative complications when using Polyglactin 910 mesh for pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction surgery., Methods: A single centre, retrospective, chart review was conducted, and a total 28 women were included in the study. Thirty-two pre-pectoral implant-based mastectomies with Polyglactin 910 mesh were performed. Early post-operative outcomes (within 12 months of procedure) including duration of antibiotic use, post-operative infection, implant displacement, flap necrosis, seroma formation, wound dehiscence, hematoma formation, capsular contracture and reconstruction failure, were recorded., Results: Only 4 (12.5%) women experienced early post-operative morbidity. One patient developed a wound dehiscence, which eventually led to reconstruction failure and removal of the implant. Another patient had seroma formation and flap necrosis. None of the patients developed postoperative implant displacement, hematoma formation or capsular contracture in the early post-operative period., Conclusion: This study reveals that early post-operative outcomes with Polyglactin 910 mesh in breast reconstructive surgery are few, thus making it a cost effective, reliable, and safe treatment option, especially in developing countries like Pakistan., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Breast augmentation is the most commonly performed aesthetic surgery procedure in women worldwide. The use of the subfascial plane has been suggested to decrease the incidence of capsular contracture compared with the subglandular plane, while simultaneously avoiding the complication of animation deformity in the subpectoral plane. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the adverse outcomes of subfascial vs subglandular planes in breast augmentation. This review was registered a priori on OSF (https://osf.io/pm92e/). A search from inception to June 2023 was performed on MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL. A hand search was also performed. All randomized and comparative cohort studies that assessed the use of the subfascial plane for breast augmentation were included. Outcomes evaluated included the incidences of seroma, hematoma, infection, rippling, capsular contracture, and revision surgery. Ten studies were included in this systematic review. Three randomized controlled trials and 7 comparative cohort studies were used for quantitative synthesis. There was a significant difference favoring subfascial compared with subglandular planes in the incidence of hematoma, rippling, and capsular contracture. All included studies had a high risk of bias. The current evidence suggests that the subfascial plane for breast augmentation decreases the risk of capsular contracture, hematoma, and rippling compared with the subglandular plane. Further randomized evidence with high methodological rigor is still required to validate these findings., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Aesthetic Society. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Nanotextured breast implants (classified as smooth implants by the latest ISO 14607:2018) have been described as possibly reducing major textured implant-related complications such as capsular contracture and breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. On the other hand, microtextured breast implants benefit from an optimal safety profile based on a much larger body of literature., Objectives: The aim of this study was to directly compare the incidence of complications between Motiva Ergonomix (Establishment Labs Holdings, Inc., Alajuela, Costa Rica) and POLYTECH MESMO (POLYTECH Health & Aesthetics GmbH, Dieburg, Germany) breast implants, especially regarding the displacement issues that might arise after breast augmentation., Methods: Consecutive patients who previously underwent surgery by the same physician for placement of Motiva Ergonomix and POLYTECH MESMO implants were included in this study. They were divided into 2 groups according to the type of implant. The onset of complications was assessed through survival analysis., Results: Data were collected from 329 patients, 185 (56.2%) with POLYTECH MESMO and 144 (43.8%) with Motiva Ergonomix implants. The median follow-up was 8 months for both groups. Of the 42 women (12.8%) who experienced at least one complication, 26 belonged to the Motiva Ergonomix subgroup (P = .013). The most represented complications during this period resulted from displacement issues, with a clear prevalence of bottoming out in the Motiva Ergonomix cohort: 15 cases vs 0 cases in the POLYTECH MESMO cohort (P < .001). For 7 patients, a reoperation was required, more frequently for patients with Motiva Ergonomix implants (4.2% vs 0.5%; P = .046)., Conclusions: POLYTECH MESMO devices provided a more favorable outcome. Motiva Ergonomix devices revealed a concerning incidence of displacement issues during the first postsurgery years, with no advantage over other major complications., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Aesthetic Society. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: The Vectra XT 3D simulation program is a valuable tool for implant selection during the decision-making process regarding breast augmentation. The software allows for the assignment of automatically or manually positioned anatomical landmarks and provides accompanying measurements., Objectives: This study aimed to present a strategy for standardizing landmark placement on Vectra images during primary breast augmentations, optimizing implant selection and ensuring consistency in breast width data collection., Methods: The author performed a retrospective analysis of patient data in which breast width measurements were obtained through clinical assessment (CA) and the Vectra program with both automatically (VA) and manually (VM) placed landmarks. Consideration was also given to the thickness of medial and lateral breast tissues. The suggested implant base width from all groups was then compared to the actual implant placed during the surgical procedure., Results: Comparing the change rates with the actual implant width revealed that rates in CA measurements were significantly lower than those in VA (P < .05), and similarly lower than those in VM (P < .05). Furthermore, change rates in VM were significantly lower than in VA (P < .05). Each group showed a significant positive correlation with the actual implant width., Conclusions: The Vectra XT 3D simulation program is a valuable adjunct in breast augmentation. However, relying on it solely may lead to inaccuracies in the assessment of breast dimensions due to automatic landmarking. To achieve standardized measurements, landmarks can be marked on the patient before creating the Vectra image. Our results underline the superiority of clinical judgment to simulation programs when establishing a reliable surgical plan., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Aesthetic Society. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Polyurethane (PU)-coated breast implants are known for their strong integration into breast tissue and the formation of capsules around them. However, capsular contracture can pose both aesthetic and clinical challenges., Objectives: The objectives of this study were to analyze the biological and morphological characteristics of the capsular tissue surrounding PU-coated implants, irrespective of their contracture status, and to assess their potential suitability as a flap in revisional breast surgery for capsular contracture., Methods: A total of 23 tissue samples were harvested from the capsules surrounding PU-coated breast implants in 12 female patients during replacement or revisional surgery. We evaluated collagen abundance, cellular and vascular density, inflammation, collagen band types and alignment, synovial metaplasia, capsule thickness, and the expression of inflammatory biomarkers and myofibroblasts with immunohistochemical techniques. Scanning electron microscopy was employed to assess implant surface characteristics over time., Results: We found a significant association of capsule contraction with longer implantation durations and greater implant surface roughness (P = .018 and P = .033, respectively). Synovial metaplasia was significantly more frequent in noncontracted capsules (P = .0049). Both capsule types consisted of paucicellular, type I collagen-rich compact fibrous tissue with low vascularization. There was a marked reduction in inflammatory cells within the foreign body granuloma. The expression of inflammatory biomarkers in the capsular tissue was negligible., Conclusions: Given the reduced levels of inflammatory and vascular components within the dense, fibrous capsular tissue, we consider them to be viable alternatives for capsular flaps in revisional surgery. This strategy has the potential to mimic the reconstruction achieved with acellular dermal matrix., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Aesthetic Society.)

Background: Despite increasing demand for breast capsular surgery to treat various benign and malignant implant-related pathologies, high-quality evidence elucidating complication profiles of capsulectomy and capsulotomy is lacking., Objectives: The aim of this study was to provide the largest-scale analysis of associated outcomes and complications using the Tracking Operations and Outcomes for Plastic Surgeons (TOPS) database, and to investigate clinical scenarios that may subject patients to increased risks for complications, most notably extent of capsular surgery (complete vs partial) and index indication of implantation (aesthetic vs reconstructive)., Methods: An analysis of the TOPS database from 2008 to 2019 was performed. CPT codes were used to identify complete capsulectomy and partial capsulectomy/capsulotomy cases. Breast implant exchange procedures constituted procedural controls., Results: In total, 7486 patients (10,703 breasts) undergoing capsulectomy or capsulotomy were assessed. Relative to controls, capsulectomy (4.40% vs 5.79%), but not capsulotomy (4.40% vs 4.50%), demonstrated higher overall complication rates. Both capsulectomies (0.83% vs 0.23%) and capsulotomies (0.56% vs 0.23%) also had greater rates of seroma relative to controls. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that reconstructive patients, relative to aesthetic patients, experienced greater overall complications (6.76% vs 4.34%), and increased risks for seroma (1.06% vs 0.47%), dehiscence (0.46% vs 0.14%), surgical site infections (1.03% vs 0.23%), and implant loss (0.52% vs 0.23%). A detailed synthesis of 30-day outcomes, including all patient- and breast-specific complications, for both capsulectomy and capsulotomy, stratified according to all potential confounders, is presented herein., Conclusions: Surgeries on the breast capsule are safe overall, although complete capsulectomies and reconstructive patients are associated with significantly increased operative risks. The present findings will enhance patient selection, counseling, and informed consent., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Aesthetic Society.)