Search

What does it mean to study "embodiment"? What does it mean to study this concept from a rhetorical perspective? Why is embodiment important? These questions are at the heart of this article--a story about a graduate-level class that investigated these ideas. This article offers reflections from the instructors, multiple students' experiences, and finally an overview of what the instructors could have done differently. Situating the article in this way allows for a move that is integral to community-based work and negotiating the differences inherent in a classroom--using and privileging story and storytelling practices. In the article, the authors argue that work about the self, especially the self in relation to rhetorical understandings of culture, is important. This is hard work; this sort of classroom experience and structure involves a large amount of risk for all involved. It requires constant reorientation of the participants to not dismiss anyone else's lived experiences. It also requires the instructors to constantly practice a critical praxis and their own reorienting. To begin, the authors discuss a special topics course offered in the fall of 2014 at Michigan State University in the Rhetoric and Writing graduate program This graduate seminar was taught by Trixie Smith and Katie Manthey, who worked as the class intern. There were seventeen students from a variety of disciplines at both the master's and doctoral levels in this rather large seminar class. In a pedagogical move designed to increase the range of embodied experiences through the class and to also call attention to these experiences, students were asked to respond to readings in a wide variety of multi-modal ways, including audio and video texts, maker projects, creative writing and/or visuals, as well as more traditional written texts, while being exposed to a wide range of text types through in-class and out-of-class readings, viewings, activities, and field trips. The class moved each week, meeting in twelve different university/public spaces over the course of fifteen weeks, once again emphasizing the embodied effects of different spaces and places, particularly on learning. This article offers an overview of how the instructors put the course together, highlights some of the students' stories, and ends with reflections on the course experience.

Coinciding with the rise of women's reform movements in the mid-nineteenth century United States, discourses and narratives about and around fashion--particularly women who donned pants--circulated via rhetorical images in print culture. Bloomerites and women who wore pants in public often generated an anxiety amidst the U.S. nation, and in turn reactionary rhetoric sought to suppress such dress, voices, and any transcending of ideological gendered spheres. But gender was not the only social concern; in fact, these reactions often stemmed from concerns of marking social class. Editors of Harper's New Monthly Magazine sought to delimit women's appearance and sustain White middle- and upperclass identity. From an anti-imperialist lens, a semiotic and discourse analysis of two illustrations published in two Harper's issues illuminates the intersection of print culture, fashion, class, gender, and U.S. imperialism. This intersection unveils how U.S. media constructed both a gendered and a classed imperial discourse that influenced material consumption and extended an imperial fashion in the United States. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]