Search

Background: In patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM) S-ICD is usually the preferred option as pacing is generally not indicated. However, limited data are available on its current practice adoption and long-term follow-up., Methods: Consecutive HCM patients with S-ICD implanted between 2013 and 2021 in 3 international centers were enrolled in this observational study. Baseline, procedural and follow-up data were regularly collected. Efficacy and safety were compared with a cohort of HCM patients implanted with a tv-ICD., Results: Seventy patients (64% males) were implanted with S-ICD at 41 ± 15 years, whereas 168 patients with tv-ICD at 49 ± 16 years. For S-ICD patients, mean ESC SCD risk score was 4,5 ± 1.9%: 25 (40%) at low-risk, 17 (27%) at intermediate and 20 (33%) at high-risk. Patients were followed-up for 5.1 ± 2.3 years. Two patients (0.6 per 100-person-years, vs 0.4 per 100 person-years with tv-ICD, p = 0.45) received an appropriate shock on VF, 17 (24%) were diagnosed with de-novo AF. Inappropriate shocks occurred in 4 patients (1.2 per 100-person-years, vs 0.9 per 100 person-years with tv-ICD, p = 0.74), all before Smart-Pass algorithm implementation. Four patients experienced device-related adverse events (1.2 per 100-person-years, vs 1 per 100 person-years with tv-ICD, p = 0.35%)., Conclusions: S-ICDs were often implanted in patients with an overall low-intermediate ESC SCD risk, reflecting both the inclusion of additional risk markers and a lower decision threshold. S-ICDs in HCM patients followed for over 5 years showed to be effective in conversion of VF and safe. Greater scrutiny may be required to avoid overtreatment in patients with milder risk profiles., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors report no conflict of interest regarding the topic discussed in the present manuscript. The study was supported by an educational grant from Boston Scientific, USA. Disclosures: Dr. I. Olivotto has received grants from Brystol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Amicus, Genzyme, Shire, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Menarini International, and fees (honoraria or consulting) from Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Amicus, Genzyme, Shire, Boston Scientific, and served or currently serving as PI on EXPLORER-HCM, MAVA-LTE, REDWOOD-HCM, REDWOOD-OLE, and SEQUOIA-HCM trial. Dr. F. Cecchi received consultancy fees from Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr. L. Crotti and Dr. N. Maurizi received consultancy fees from Bristol Myers Squibb., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Guidelines recommend early discharge and rehabilitation after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in low-risk patients. However, low risk is not established according to well-defined criteria and often it depends on subjective judgment. The aim of this real-life study is to confirm that early discharge is safe in patients at low risk according to selected criteria and subsequent outpatient rehabilitation is associated with clinical benefits., Methods: Patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention from October 2010 to October 2017, identified as being at low risk (according to predefined criteria), discharged by day 5, were studied retrospectively. Basal characteristics and 30-day outcome were evaluated and a comparison was made between patients who completed or did not complete outpatient rehabilitation., Results: We enrolled 193 STEMI patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI, early discharged and at low risk: 132 completed outpatient rehabilitation and 61 did not. The increase in cardiac enzymes and the occurrence of arrhythmias were the only independent predictors of completion of outpatient rehabilitation. After 30 days from discharge, adverse events were rare and not significantly different between groups. Optimal pharmacological therapy was achieved more often in the rehabilitation group (58.3% vs 44.3%; p<0.05)., Conclusions: Early discharge within 5 days of STEMI has been proved feasible and safe in our population of well-defined low-risk patients. Early participation in a rehabilitation program was associated with a more adequate titration of therapy.

Aim The Program to Access and Review Trending iNformation and Evaluate coRrelation to Symptoms in patients with Heart Failure (PARTNERS HF) trial elaborated a multiparametric model for prediction of acute decompensation in advanced heart failure patients, based on periodical in office data download from cardiac resynchronisation devices. In this study, we evaluated the ability of the PARTNERS HF criteria to detect initial decompensation in a population of moderate heart failure patients under remote monitoring. Methods We retrospectively applied the PARTNERS HF criteria to 1860 transmissions from 104 patients (median follow up 21 months; range 1-67 months), who were enrolled in our programme of telemedicine after cardiac resynchronisation therapy. We tested the ability of a score based on these criteria to predict any acute clinical decompensation occurring in the 15 days following a transmission. Results In 441 cases, acute heart failure was diagnosed after the index transmission. The area under the curve (AUC) of the score for the diagnosis of acute decompensation was 0.752 (confidence interval (CI) 95% 0.728-0.777). The best score cut-off was consistent with the results of PARTNERS HF: with a score ≥2, sensitivity was 75% and specificity 68%. The odds ratio for events was 6.24 (CI 95% 4.90-7.95; p < 0.001). Conclusions When retrospectively applied to remote monitoring transmissions and arranged in a score, PARTNERS HF criteria could identify HF patients who subsequently developed acute decompensation. These results warrant prospective studies applying PARTNERS HF criteria to remote monitoring.