1. Evaluation of yeast-based additives on rumen fermentation in high- and low-concentrate diets using a dual-flow continuous culture system.
- Author
-
Cagliari AR, Magnani E, Loregian KE, Rigon F, Casagrande AC, Amancio BR, Giacomelli CM, da Silva JB, Santos VL, Marcondes MI, Branco RH, Del Bianco Benedeti P, and de Paula EM
- Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of using 3 yeast-based additives as an alternative to sodium monensin on rumen fermentation parameters using a dual-flow continuous fermentation system. Ten fermenters (1,223 ± 21 mL) were used in 2 simultaneous 5 × 5 Latin squares arrangement with 3 periods of 10 d each, with 7 d for diet adaptation and 3 d for sample collections. Each Latin square assigning either a low or high level of concentrate to beef cattle diets, with 5 specified treatments: Control: no additives; Blend 1: yeast culture ( Saccharomyces cerevisiae ), beta-glucans, fructooligosaccharides, galactooligosaccharides, and mannanoligosaccharides [1,600 mg/kg dry matter (DM)]; Blend 2: Beta-glucan and mannanoligosaccharide fractions from S. cerevisiae (1,600 mg/kg DM); Yeast Cells: hydrolyzed, inactivated, and spray-dried yeast cells ( S. cerevisiae ; 2,133 mg/kg DM); monensin (25 mg/kg DM). On days 8, 9, and 10, samples of 500 mL of solid and liquid digesta effluent were mixed, homogenized, and stored at -20 °C. Subsamples of 10 mL were collected for later determination of ammonia nitrogen (NH
3 -N) and volatile fatty acids (VFA). Diets with high-concentrate showed higher organic matter (OM) digestibility but lower crude protein and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibilities ( P < 0.01). There were no feed additive effects for DM, OM, and NDF digestibilities ( P > 0.05). Total VFA concentration and butyrate concentration were higher for the high-concentrate diet ( P < 0.01). Conversely, pH and concentrations of acetate and iso-butyrate were higher for the low-concentrate diet ( P < 0.01). Treatments with Blend 1, Blend 2, and Yeast Cells had higher VFA concentrations compared to the control ( P = 0.04). Blend 1 treatment exhibited higher propionate concentration in fermenters fed with a high-concentrate diet ( P < 0.01). In the high-concentrate diet, Blend 1 had a lower acetate: propionate ratio compared to Control, Yeast Cells, and Blend 2 treatments ( P < 0.01). The high-concentrate diet showed higher means for all other parameters: Microbial efficiency, N efficiency, N flow, and Bacterial N flow ( P < 0.01). Treatments with Blend 2 and Control showed higher rumen undegradable protein N flow compared to Yeast Cells and Blend 1 treatments ( P < 0.01). Our findings imply that yeast-based additives might be used as alternatives to monensin, improving ruminal fermentation and promoting enhanced sustainability in livestock., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF