Search

Problem: Prescribing by Endorsed Midwives has existed in Australia for more than ten years. Significant barriers exist in the bureaucracy surrounding prescribing and state and territory legislation which further constrain midwives capacity to prescribe required medications., Background: Current evidence indicates Endorsed Midwives improve timely access to medications and can experience both enablers and barriers to prescribing., Aim: To explore Endorsed Midwives' lived experiences of medication prescribing, including which medications are being prescribed, how this affects the women in their care, midwives' practice, and perspectives on the future of midwifery prescribing., Methods: A descriptive qualitative approach was used. Data collection occurred through semi-structured interviews (n=10) of Endorsed Midwives from varied Australian practice contexts and locations. Data analysis followed Reflexive Thematic Analysis., Findings: Four themes were developed: Medication prescription as essential healthcare; Prescribing optimises midwifery practice; External structures can both promote and inhibit the capacity to prescribe; The future of prescribing., Discussion: Endorsed Midwife prescribing has the potential to positively impact women's maternity care and enable midwives to fulfil their scope of practice. However, limitations to prescribing need to be addressed to capitalise on these benefits., Conclusion: Significant reform of health service policy, state and territory legislation and further development of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme are required to fully embrace and capitalise on the full scope of Endorsed Midwives in the Australian Healthcare system., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Problem: There is little documented evidence regarding the practice of midwives providing care for women with acute concerns in early pregnancy (< 20 weeks) in Australia., Background: Women can experience unexpected complications at any gestation of pregnancy and may seek acute care in an emergency or gynaecology service, usually staffed by registered nurses (RNs). They may not receive care from specialised pregnancy clinicians, including midwives. The role and scope of practice of midwives working in acute early pregnancy settings in Australia has not been previously reported. This study provides an opportunity to document practice in an area of pregnancy care not often visible within maternity services in Australia., Research Aim: To describe midwives' and RNs perceptions, perspectives and experiences of role and scope of practice in acute early pregnancy care provision in Australia., Methods: A qualitative descriptive approach was adopted. Midwives and RNs with acute early pregnancy knowledge and experience were recruited. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and data analysed using inductive thematic analysis., Findings: Fifteen participants were interviewed. Three themes were constructed from interview data: Personal and Professional Influences; Being There for Women; The Impact of Setting., Discussion: Findings reinforce the lack of clarity around how midwives' scope is enabled in traditional acute early pregnancy care. Setting of care has influenced practice and seen a barrier for midwives who don't hold nursing registration from fulfilling professional scope. Results provide novel benchmarking evidence regarding a largely hidden area of midwifery, signposting areas for reform within education, policy and health service sectors., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest in this project., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This systematic review evaluated the available evidence of the effects of PPIs during pregnancy on preeclampsia and related maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes., Data Sources: Five electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Global Medicus Index) were searched on 17 November 2023., Study Eligibility Criteria: Randomized controlled trials involving pregnant women, using any class or dose of PPIs, were eligible., Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods: Meta-analysis was conducted for all outcomes of interest, with random-effects models. Results were presented as risk ratios or mean difference. Quality assessment was performed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) assessment was completed to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023423673)., Results: Our search identified 3,879 records, which were screened by two authors independently. Nine reports (describing eight trials) met our eligibility criteria, however six trials were ultimately excluded from our analysis as women were only given PPIs immediately prior to Cesarean section for acid aspiration prevention. The two trials included in the meta-analysis evaluated the treatment of 177 women with diagnosed preeclampsia. For the primary outcomes, moderate-certainty evidence showed there is likely no effect of the use of PPIs on risk of HELLP syndrome (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.37 - 3.99, I² = 0%) or perinatal mortality (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.36 - 1.79, I² = 0%), while there were insufficient data to meta-analyse all other primary outcomes, including eclampsia and neonatal mortality. No trials investigated PPIs for preventing preeclampsia., Conclusions: Given the limited outcome data we are uncertain of the effect of PPIs in women with preeclampsia. Further trials are required to determine what (if any) effects PPIs might have for preeclampsia prevention or treatment., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Issue Addressed: Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) knowledge influences health literacy and promotes positive health behaviours. This scoping review explores the SRH knowledge of women in Australia and reports on knowledge assessment, ways of learning, enablers and barriers, and interventions to improve knowledge., Methods: Seven databases were searched for eligible articles published in English between 2012 and 2022., Results: Eighty-five sources were included for analysis. Data were mapped by knowledge topic and population group and charted against four review objectives. Assessment of knowledge was the primary focus in 59% of sources. Two sources used a validated knowledge assessment tool. Knowledge was assessed using self-assessment, a measurement of correctness, or both. Women learnt about SRH through a range of sources, including healthcare providers, peers, family, internet, and school. Enablers and barriers spanned information content, delivery, timing, accessibility, interactions with those providing information, cultural and gendered norms, pre-migration experiences, and functional health literacy. Nine sources reported on interventions to facilitate SRH knowledge., Conclusions: This review identified topics, population groups, and gaps in assessment of SRH knowledge of women in Australia. Overall, the measurement of women's SRH knowledge is largely conducted using unvalidated tools focusing on specific topics. SO WHAT?: It is recommended a validated tool be developed to comprehensively assess the SRH knowledge of women in Australia allowing for intersectional population analysis and exploration of knowledge conceptualisation. This would enable assessment of interventions aiming to improve SRH knowledge thereby facilitating improved health literacy and outcomes., (© 2024 The Author(s). Health Promotion Journal of Australia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Health Promotion Association.)

Background: In the Australian maternity system, general practitioners play a vital role in advising and directing prospective parents to maternity models of care. Optimising model of care discussions and the decision-making process avoids misaligning women with over or under specialised care, reduces the potential for disruptive care transitions and unnecessary healthcare costs, and is critical in ensuring consumer satisfaction. Current literature overwhelmingly focusses on women's decision-making around model of care discussions and neglects the gatekeeping role of the General Practitioner (GP). This study aimed to explore and describe the factors influencing Australian GPs decision-making when referring pregnant women to maternity models of care., Methods: This study used a qualitative descriptive approach. General practitioners (N = 12) with experience referring women to maternity models of care in Australia participated in a semi-structured interview. Interviews occurred between October and November 2021 by telephone or videoconference. Reflexive thematic analysis was facilitated by NVivo-12 data management software to codify and interpret themes from the data., Findings: Two broad themes were interpreted from the data. The first theme entitled 'GP Factors', incorporated three associated sub-themes including '1) GPs Previous Model of Care Experience', '2) Gaps in GP Knowledge' and '3) GP Perception of Models of Care'. The second theme, entitled 'Woman's Factors', encapsulated two associated sub-themes including the '4) Woman's Preferences' and '5) Access to Models'., Conclusions: This study provides novel evidence regarding general practitioner perspectives of the factors influencing model of care decision-making and referral. Predominant findings suggest that gaps in GP knowledge regarding the available models of care are present and are largely informed by prior personal and professional experience. Most GPs described referring to models of care they perceive positively and centring their model of care discussions on the woman's preferences and accessibility. The exploration and description of factors influencing model of care decisions provide unique insight into the ways that all stakeholders can experience access to a broader range of models of care including midwifery-led continuity of care models aligned with consumer-demand. In addition, the role of national primary health networks is outlined as a means to achieving this., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Thomas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Objective: The objective of this scoping review was to investigate and describe what is reported on the role and scope of practice of midwives and registered nurses providing care for women with pregnancy complications under 20 weeks' gestation in acute clinical settings in Australia., Introduction: In many high-income countries, women experiencing unexpected complications in early pregnancy attend an acute care service, such as an emergency department, rather than a maternity or obstetric unit. This service structure can impact the care women receive, and determine who provides it. Women and their partners, who are often experiencing emotional distress, have reported difficult experiences when accessing acute services, particularly emergency departments, which are not traditionally staffed by midwives. The role and scope of practice of both midwives and registered nurses providing acute early pregnancy care in most high-income countries, including Australia, is poorly reported. Documenting this area of practice is an important first step in facilitating ongoing research in this important aspect of pregnancy care., Inclusion Criteria: Published and gray literature that described the role and scope of practice of midwives and/or registered nurses providing care in acute early pregnancy settings in Australia were considered for this review., Methods: A scoping review of the literature was conducted following JBI methodological guidance and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. A 3-step search strategy was conducted to explore evidence from databases and search engines, gray literature sources, and selected reference lists. After screening, data were extracted from records selected for the final review, mapped, and analyzed using content analysis., Results: The evidence reviewed (n=23) included primary research studies, conference abstracts, and gray literature, such as clinical guidance documents, academic theses, and websites from January 2008 to October 2023. The most common setting for care provision was the emergency department. Midwives' and registered nurses' roles and scope of practice in acute early pregnancy care in Australia can be summarized into 4 areas: physical care, psychosocial support, care co-ordination, and communication. Women's access to midwifery care at this time in pregnancy appears to be limited. Registered nurses, usually employed in emergency departments, have the most prominent role and scope in the provision of care for women with acute early pregnancy complications. Descriptions of midwives' practice focuses more on psychosocial support and follow-up care, particularly in early pregnancy assessment service models., Conclusions: This review highlights the inconsistency in midwives' and registered nurses' roles and scope in acute early pregnancy in Australia, a finding which is relevant to other international settings. Both professions could further fulfill role and scope capacity in the provision of supportive, individualized, and timely care for women and families accessing a range of acute early pregnancy services. Emergency departments are the usual practice domain of registered nurses who may be limited in terms of the scope of care they can provide to women with early pregnancy complications. Leaders of the midwifery profession should conduct further research into innovative service models that embed a role for midwives in all settings that provide care for pregnant women, regardless of gestation., Review Registration: Open Science Framework osf.io/7zchu., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (COPYRIGHT © 2023 THE AUTHORS. PUBLISHED BY WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC. ON BEHALF OF JBI.)

Objective: We sought to explore and describe midwives' attitudes and practices relating to their provision of postpartum contraception counselling., Design: We used an exploratory cross-sectional design. Recruitment used an anonymous online survey using electronic communication platforms of professional, and special-interest organisations, over six months . Descriptive and quantitative analysis was used., Setting and Participants: Australian Midwives who provide postpartum care., Meaning and Findings: A total of 289 complete responses were included. Findings from this national survey of midwives showed that almost 75% of Australian midwives reported providing some contraceptive advice to women. Those working in continuity of care models were significantly more likely to fulfil this responsibility. More than half (67%) indicated they had not received any formal contraception education or training. Those working in private obstetric-led settings were significantly less likely to have received education compared to midwives in community settings. Systems barriers preventing the provision of contraceptive counselling included: clinical workload; lack of management support; lack of education; and models of care., Key Conclusions: Most midwives (82%) wanted to provide postpartum contraception counselling as part of their role. They cited barriers from within the health system, ambiguity about roles and responsibilities and offered solutions to improve the provision of postnatal contraception counselling., Implications for Practice: Recommendations include the development of education programs for midwives. Continuity of care models provided the time, autonomy and opportunity for midwives to undertake contraceptive counselling and fulfil this part of their professional scope. Consideration should be given to expanding access and provision of continuity of midwifery care. An urgent investment in the education and skills of midwives is recommended to ensure all women across acute and community services benefit from improved outcomes associated with pregnancy spacing., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Crown Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Just over 300,000 women give birth in Australia each year. It is important for health care providers, managers, and policy makers know what women want from their care so services can be provided appropriately. This review is a part of the Midwifery Futures Project, which aims to prepare the midwifery workforce to best address the needs of women. The aim of this review was to describe and analyse current literature on the maternity care needs of women in Australia., Methods: A scoping review methodology was used, guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute framework. A systematic search of the literature identified 9023 studies, and 59 met inclusion criteria: being peer-reviewed research focusing on maternity care needs, conducted in Australian populations, from 2012 to 2023. The studies were analysed using inductive content analysis., Results: Four themes were developed: Continuity of care, being seen and heard, being safe, and being enabled. Continuity of care, especially a desire for midwifery continuity of care, was the central theme, as it was a tool supporting women to be seen and heard, safe, and enabled., Conclusion: This review highlights that women in Australia consistently want access to midwifery continuity of care as an enabler for addressing their maternity care needs. Transforming Australian maternity care policy and service provision towards continuity would better meet women's needs., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Caroline Homer declares she is the current Editor-in-Chief of Women & Birth. The Deputy Editor, Prof Linda Sweet, managed this submission and made the final decision. All other authors have no further conflicts to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Problem: Despite 10 years of prescribing scheduled medicines by Endorsed Midwives, little is known about prescribing practices., Background: Endorsed Midwives can prescribe scheduled medicines and have access to Medicare rebates to support service provision. Endorsed Midwives have the potential to improve access to medications for women, however, are met with barriers, including inconsistencies in state and national legislation., Aim: To search for what is published regarding Endorsed Midwife prescribing of scheduled medicines in Australia, report on the literature, synthesise the findings and discuss the results., Methods: A scoping review utilising the Joanna Brigg's Institute methodology. A search of CINAHL, PubMed, Science Direct and Medline databases was conducted. Seven peer-reviewed articles were identified; three discussion papers, one literature review and three research papers, published between 2016 and 2023 in English. Qualitative content analysis was used to identify topic areas., Findings: Four topic areas were identified: 1) Endorsed Midwives increase women's access to prescribed medications; 2) the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme is restrictive and diminishes midwifery prescribing; 3) medication prescribing depends on internal and external structures; 4) professional relationships support prescribing., Discussion: The authority to prescribe augments Endorsed Midwives' practice, improves timely access to medications and enhances role satisfaction. The effective use of midwifery prescribing is hampered by barriers such as the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, inappropriate medication formularies, and poorly designed health service policy., Conclusion: To fully utilise Endorsed Midwife prescribing in all settings of maternity care, further work is required to develop education, remove barriers, and demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of midwifery prescribing., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest There are no Conflicts of Interest to declare., (Crown Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To evaluate gynaecological patients' preferences and satisfaction regarding information provision, exploring enablers and barriers to information access., Design: A descriptive cross-sectional survey design was used., Methods: A total of 293 women accessing gynaecological services responded to the survey. Quantitative analysis included descriptive and inferential statistics. Content analysis was conducted on qualitative data., Results: Health professionals were the most common and preferred sources of gynaecological health information. Enablers to information provision included positive communication strategies by health professionals, participants having prior knowledge and doing their own research. Despite its widespread availability, only 24.2% of women preferred the internet as an information source. Poor communication and inadequate information provision were identified as barriers to information access. Statistically significant associations were identified between location of residence, education level, year of birth, diagnostic group and health information preferences. Recommendations from women included improved communication strategies, system changes and provision of individualized information., Conclusion: Health professionals are central to women accessing information about gynaecological diagnoses. Areas for improvement include communication strategies, facilitating access to internet-based resources for information and consideration of women's preferences when providing health information., Implications for the Profession and Patient Care: Consumer co-design of gynaecological health information and communication training for health professionals is recommended. Improved communication and facilitated use of internet-based resources may improve women's understanding of information., Impact: This study explored gynaecological patients' preferences and satisfaction regarding information provision, exploring enablers and barriers to information access. It was found that gynaecological patients preferred individualized information provided to them directly by health professionals and despite its widespread availability, the internet is an underutilized health information resource. These findings are applicable to health professionals and patients utilizing tertiary gynaecological health services in Australia but may be generalized if demographic data aligns with other jurisdictions., Reporting Method: The STROBE reporting method was used in the preparation of the manuscript., Patient or Public Contribution: No patient or public contribution., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Problem: There is no international standard for advanced midwifery scope of practice., Background: Globally, there is variance in how scope of midwifery practice is determined and regulated, with no consensus on extended or advanced scope. This can lead to under-utilised staff potential, un-met consumer need, and loss of professional skill., Aims: The aim of this scoping review was to synthesise and map what is reported in the international literature on the advanced scope of midwifery practice., Methods: A systematic scoping review methodology was adopted utilising Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A full search was conducted of databases including MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Google. Publications from 2019 to August 2022 that met criteria were included. Reported skills were mapped to the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) competencies of pre-conception, antenatal, labour and birth, postnatal plus globally identified areas for midwifery investment., Findings: 28 articles met inclusion criteria. Reported skills included abortion care (n = 6), prescribing (n = 7), ultrasound (n = 2), advanced practice skills (n = 7), midwifery-led skills, primary health, post-graduate education, HIV/AIDS testing, advocacy, and acupressure (all n = 1)., Discussion: This review presents a synopsis of publications describing what has been defined as advanced midwifery scope of practice in international contexts., Conclusion: Establishing evidence of midwives working to the peak of professional scope is important to continue to develop professional capacity and support contemporary practice, regulation, governance, and policy while improving consumer access to equitable care. Findings aid service development, provision, and professional planning., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Improving sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, and adolescent health outcomes necessitates greater commitment to, and investments in, midwifery. To identify future research priorities to advance and strengthen midwifery, we conducted a scoping review to synthesise and report areas of midwifery that have been explored in the previous 10 years in the 11 countries of the World Health Organization's South-East Asia region. Electronic peer-reviewed databases were searched for primary peer-reviewed research published in any language, published between January 2012 and December 2022 inclusive. A total of 7086 citations were screened against the review inclusion criteria. After screening and full text review, 195 sources were included. There were 94 quantitative (48.2%), 67 qualitative (34.4%) and 31 mixed methods (15.9%) studies. The majority were from Indonesia (n = 93, 47.7%), India (n = 41, 21.0%) and Bangladesh (n = 26, 13.3%). There were no sources identified from the Democratic People's Republic of Korea or the Maldives. We mapped the findings against six priority areas adapted from the 2021 State of the World's Midwifery Report and Regional Strategic Directions for Strengthening Midwifery in the South-East Asia region (2020-2024): practice or service delivery (n = 73, 37.4%), pre-service education (n = 60, 30.8%), in-service education or continuing professional development (n = 51, 26.2%), workforce management (n = 46, 23.6%), governance and regulation (n = 21, 10.8%) and leadership (n = 12, 6.2%). Most were published by authors with affiliations from the country where the research was conducted. The volume of published midwifery research reflects country-specific investment in developing a midwifery workforce, and the transition to midwifery-led care. There was variation between countries in how midwife was defined, education pathways, professional regulation, education accreditation, governance models and scope of practice. Further evaluation of the return on investment in midwifery education, regulation, deployment and retention to support strategic decision-making is recommended. Key elements of leadership requiring further exploration included career pathways, education and development needs and regulatory frameworks to support and embed effective midwifery leadership at all levels of health service governance., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2023 Griffin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Preconception and interconception care improves health outcomes of women and communities. Little is known about how prepared and willing Australian midwives are to provide preconception and interconception care. The aim of this study was to explore midwives' knowledge, perspectives and learning needs, and barriers and enablers to delivering preconception and interconception care. We conducted a cross-sectional exploratory study of midwives working in any Australian maternity setting. An online survey measured midwives' self-rated knowledge; education needs and preferences; attitudes towards pre and interconception care; and views on barriers, enablers; and, future service and workforce planning. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and demographic characteristics (e.g., years of experience, model of care) associated with knowledge and attitudes regarding pre- and interconception care were examined using univariate logistic regression analysis. Qualitative data were captured through open-ended questions and analysed using inductive content analysis. We collected responses from (n = 338) midwives working across all models of care (full survey completion rate 96%). Most participants (n = 290; 85%) rated their overall knowledge about pre and interconception health as excellent, above average or average. Participants with over 11 years of experience were more likely to report above average to excellent knowledge (OR 3.11; 95% CI 1.09, 8.85). Online e-learning was the most preferred format for education on this topic (n = 244; 72%). Most (n = 257; 76%) reported interest in providing pre and interconception care more regularly and that this is within the midwifery scope of practice (n = 292; 87%). Low prioritisation in service planning was the most frequently selected barrier to providing preconception and interconception care, whereas continuity models and hybrid child health settings were reported as enablers of pre and interconception care provision. Findings revealed that midwives are prepared and willing to provide preconception and interconception care. Pre and post registration professional development; service and funding reform; and policy development are critical to enable Australian midwives' provision of pre and interconception care., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2023 Bradfield et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Problem: There is little documented evidence of midwives' perspectives regarding the use of nitrous oxide in the peripartum period., Background: Nitrous oxide is an inhaled gas used widely in the peripartum period; usually offered and managed by midwives., Aim: Explore midwives' knowledge, perceptions, and practices of facilitating women's use of nitrous oxide in the peripartum period., Methods: An exploratory cross-sectional survey design was used. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics; open-ended responses underwent template analysis., Findings: Midwives (n = 121) working in three Australian settings reported regularly recommending the use of nitrous oxide and high levels of knowledge and confidence supporting its use. There was a significant association between midwifery experience, and perspectives on women's capacity to use nitrous effectively (p = 0.004); and desire for refresher education (p < 0.001). Midwives working in continuity models were more likely to support women using nitrous oxide in any situation (p = 0.039)., Discussion: Midwives demonstrated expertise in facilitating nitrous oxide use, citing utility to relieve anxiety and distract women from pain or discomfort. Nitrous oxide was identified as an important adjunct to the provision of supportive care requiring midwifery therapeutic presence., Conclusion: This study provides novel insight into midwives' support of nitrous oxide use in the peripartum setting revealing high levels of knowledge and confidence. Recognition of this unique expertise held by midwives is important to ensure transfer and development of professional knowledge and skills and emphasises the need for midwifery leadership in clinical service provision, planning and policy., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Problem: There is limited data regarding dose and duration of nitrous oxide use by women in peripartum care. Experiences of using nitrous in Australian settings have not previously been explored BACKGROUND: More than 1:2 women use nitrous oxide analgesia during labour and birth, despite this, there are limited published data on nitrous oxide use for labour or procedural analgesia in Australia., Aim: To explore the use of nitrous oxide during labour and birth or procedural care., Methods: A two-phased sequential design was used; clinical audit (n = 183) and cross-sectional survey (n = 137) approaches supported data collection. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, qualitative data underwent content analysis., Findings: Nitrous oxide was used by primiparous and multiparous women evenly. Duration of labour-use ranged from < 15 min (10.9%) to > 5 h (10.8%), with equal representation between > 50% concentration (43%) and < 50% (43%). At audit, 75% found nitrous useful; postpartum maternal satisfaction scores remained high, mean indicators were 75%. More multiparous women found nitrous oxide useful than primiparous (95%vs80%,p = 0.009). There was no association between perceived usefulness and whether women were in spontaneous, augmented or induced labour; regardless of concentrations reached. Three key themes described women's perspectives of physical and psycho-emotional effects and challenges., Discussion: Nitrous oxide plays an important role in the provision of analgesia during procedural or labour and birth care. Service provision, parent and professional education, and future service design will benefit from these novel findings confirming the utility and acceptability of nitrous oxide use in contemporary maternity care., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Problem: There is minimal evidence regarding the role or impact of birth plans from the perspective of women experiencing scheduled caesarean birth., Background: Quality maternity care requires respect for women's preferences. Evidence suggests birth plans enable communication of women's preferences and may enhance agency when vaginal birth is intended, however there is limited evidence of how this translates in the perioperative environment where caesarean birth is the intended outcome., Aim: Explore the experiences and perspectives of women who had utilised a scheduled caesarean birth plan at an Australian tertiary maternity hospital., Methods: A cross-sectional design was used; 294 participants completed the survey within two weeks post-birth. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse quantitative data, qualitative responses were analysed using content analysis., Findings: Over half of the women requested lowering of the surgical-screen at birth, most requested immediate skin-to-skin with their babies; around two-thirds of these preferences were met. Use of a birth plan for scheduled caesarean section supported women's ability to communicate their desires and choices, enhancing agency and reinforcing the significance of the caesarean birth experience. Qualitative data revealed two main categories: Perceptions and experiences; and Recommendations for improvement, with corresponding sub-categories., Discussion: Findings provide unique opportunities to consider the provision of woman-centred care within the highly technocratic perioperative environment., Conclusion: All women, regardless of birth mode, have a right to respectful maternity care that prioritises their wishes and agency. This study provides evidence for the positive utility of birth plans in caesarean birth, local adaptation is encouraged., (Crown Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The objective of this review is to review and synthesize what is documented on the role and scope of practice of midwives and registered nurses working in acute early pregnancy care settings in Australia., Introduction: Women experiencing complications before 20 weeks of pregnancy may need to attend an acute care service, often a hospital emergency department. Midwives and registered nurses provide care for women with early pregnancy complications, and it is important that their role and scope of practice is documented. This review will explore the literature relating to acute early pregnancy care in Australia to better understand how midwives' and registered nurses' roles and scope are currently described in this setting., Inclusion Criteria: Any literature that explores the role and scope of practice of midwives and registered nurses who care for women who present to acute care services in Australia with early pregnancy complications will be considered for inclusion in the review., Methods: A 3-step review process will involve a preliminary search of MEDLINE and ProQuest, followed by a more detailed search of a larger selection of databases, using identified keywords and phrases from the initial search. Reference lists of retrieved literature will then be examined for relevant citations. Literature in English will be considered, including relevant gray literature. Search results will be imported into reference and review support software. Data that align with the inclusion criteria will be organized into tabulated and narrative formats for presentation., Details of This Review Project Are Available at: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/5bnqz., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 JBI.)

Background: The content of midwifery courses is very similar across universities. The teaching approach is not, with universities adopting a variety of pedagogical methods., Aim: To explore views of midwifery students, midwifery academics and senior academic managers comparing a continuity approach where one main academic provides the majority of midwifery content plus pastoral care compared with a team-teaching approach of midwifery education where lecturers change throughout the course., Methods: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were used to discover thoughts, benefits and disadvantages of two teaching approaches. Data were analysed using thematic analysis., Findings: Midwifery students and academics valued relationship building, consistency of advice and assessment expectations of the continuity approach but also appreciated a variety of teaching styles and content found in the team-teaching approach. Senior academic managers favoured a team-teaching approach due to workload concerns., Discussion: Continuity and team-teaching pedagogical approaches offer different advantages. Continuity in midwifery education may provide students with a meaningful trusting relationship with their teacher and consistency of information, which could aid learning. A team-teaching approach provides students with diversity of teaching styles and midwifery 'stories'. A combination of both pedagogies offering both a mix of teachers and a named 'go-to' mentor might help meet student requirements for both continuity and variety., Conclusion: Relationship building, consistency and trust, were all evident in the continuity approach whereas the team-teaching approach was considered to be a more sustainable workload model., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest None declared., (Copyright © 2022 Australian College of Midwives. All rights reserved.)

Background: Women receiving continuity of midwifery care have increased satisfaction and improved outcomes. Preparation of midwifery students to work in continuity models from the point of graduation may provide an ongoing midwifery workforce that meets rising demand from women for access to such care., Aim of the Paper: The aim of this paper is to describe an innovative midwifery course based on a continuity model, where students acquire more than 50 % of clinical hours through continuity of care experiences. Additional educational strategies incorporated in the course to enhance the CCE experience within the philosophy of midwifery care, include a virtual maternity centre, case-based learning and the Resources Activities Support Evaluation (RASE) pedagogical model of learning., Discussion: Australian accredited midwifery courses vary in structure, format and philosophy; this new course provides students with an alternative option of study for those who have a particular interest in continuity of midwifery care., Conclusion: A midwifery course which provides the majority of clinical hours through continuity of care may prepare graduates for employment within midwifery group practice models by demonstrating the benefits of relationship building, improved outcomes and the reality of an on-call lifestyle., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest All authors confirm that there are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Introduction: The provision of maternity services in Australia has been significantly disrupted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Many changes were initiated quickly, often with rapid dissemination of information to women. The aim of this study was to better understand what information and messages were circulating regarding COVID-19 and pregnancy in Australia and potential information gaps., Methods: This study adopted a qualitative approach using social media and interviews. A data analytics tool (TIGER-C19) was used to extract data from social media platforms Reddit and Twitter from June to July 2021 (in the middle of the third COVID-19 wave in Australia). A total of 21 individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with those who were, or had been, pregnant in Australia since March 2020. Social media data were analysis via inductive content analysis and interview data were thematically analysed., Results: Social media provided a critical platform for sharing and seeking information, as well as highlighting attitudes of the community towards COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy. Women interviewed described wanting further information on the risks COVID-19 posed to themselves and their babies, and greater familiarity with the health service during pregnancy, in which they would labour and give birth. Health providers were a trusted source of information. Communication strategies that allowed participants to engage in real-time interactive discussions were preferred. A real or perceived lack of information led participants to turn to informal sources, increasing the potential for exposure to misinformation., Conclusion: It is vital that health services communicate effectively with pregnant women, early and often throughout public health crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. This was particularly important during periods of increased restrictions on accessing hospital services. Information and communication strategies need to be clear, consistent, timely and accessible to reduce reliance on informal and potentially inaccurate sources., Competing Interests: The authors have declared no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2023 Caddy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: Pregnant women are at increased risk for severe COVID-19 and are a priority group for vaccination. The discrepancy in vaccination rates between pregnant and non-pregnant cohorts is concerning., Aims: This study aimed to assess the perceptions and intentions of pregnant women toward COVID-19 vaccination and explored vaccine uptake and reasons for vaccine hesitancy., Materials and Method: A cross-sectional exploratory design was performed evaluating pregnant women receiving care in two metropolitan maternity units in Western Australia. The main measurable outcomes included vaccination status, intention to be vaccinated, and reasons for delaying or declining vaccination., Results: In total, 218 women participated. Of these, 122 (56%) had not received either dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Sixty (28%) claimed that vaccination was not discussed with them and 33 (15%) reported being dissuaded from vaccination by a healthcare practitioner. Compared to vaccinated women, those who had not accepted vaccination were less likely to have had vaccination discussed by maternity staff, less aware that pregnant women are a priority group, and less aware that pregnancy increased the risk of severe illness. Unvaccinated women were concerned about the side effects of the vaccine for their newborn and their own health, felt there was inadequate information on safety during pregnancy, and felt that a lack of community transmission in Western Australia reduced the necessity to be vaccinated., Conclusion: Vaccine delay and hesitancy is common among pregnant women in Western Australia. Education of healthcare professionals and pregnant women on the recommendation for COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy is required., (© 2022 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.)

Objective Health research priorities are commonly identified and resourced by strategic leaders. The importance of recognising the expertise of clinician-researchers is being prioritised by a national funding shift towards applied research. There is a dearth of evidence regarding research priorities for maternity care in rural and remote health in Australia. This study aimed to develop an evidence-based consensus of maternity research priorities in regional, rural, and remote areas of Australia's largest rural health service (by land area) in Western Australia. Methods A three-phased Delphi method was selected to achieve an interdisciplinary, evidence-based consensus on maternity research priorities within Western Australian Country Health Service. Results Across three study phases, 432 participants responded. Representation was from seven regions and all stakeholder roles within the regions. Phase 1 included 173 responses yielding 53 concepts categorised under five domains. Phase 2 involved 161 participants who prioritised concepts under domains of (i) workforce and education; (ii) health equity; (iii) Aboriginal health; (iv) logistics and health systems; and (v) clinical. Phase 3 included 96 participants revealing 15 maternity research priorities with the top four ranked concepts: 'recruitment and retention of staff'; 'care for women and families with vulnerabilities', 'models of care offering continuity' and 'systems efficiencies'. Conclusions The novel evidence provided in this study, in conjunction with a strong consensus on research priorities and an interdisciplinary approach, strengthens the findings of this study and amplifies the mandate of action without delay.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused isolation, fear, and impacted on maternal healthcare provision., Aim: To explore midwives' experiences about how COVID-19 impacted their ability to provide woman-centred care, and what lessons they have learnt as a result of the mandated government and hospital restrictions (such as social distancing) during the care of the woman and her family., Methods: A qualitative interpretive descriptive study was conducted. Twenty-six midwives working in all models of care in all states and territories of Australia were recruited through social media, and selected using a maximum variation sampling approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews between May to August, 2020. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed., Findings: Two overarching themes were identified: 'COVID-19 causing chaos' and 'keeping the woman at the centre of care'. The 'COVID-19 causing chaos' theme included three sub-themes: 'quickly evolving situation', 'challenging to provide care', and 'affecting women and families'. The 'Keeping the woman at the centre of care' theme included three sub-themes: 'trying to keep it normal', 'bending the rules and pushing the boundaries', and 'quality time for the woman, baby, and family unit'., Conclusion: Findings of this study offer important evidence regarding the impact of the pandemic on the provision of woman-centred care which is key to midwifery philosophy. Recommendations are made for ways to preserve and further enhance woman-centred care during periods of uncertainty such as during a pandemic or other health crises., (Crown Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Problem: There is limited evidence regarding midwives' confidence and practices in providing sexual and reproductive health care in Australia., Background: Midwives provide important public health education to women regarding sexual and reproductive health care., Aim: The aim of this study was to explore midwives' confidence and practices around providing education to women on three key areas of sexual and reproductive health: contraception and family planning; sexual activity; and sexual health., Methods: A cross-sectional exploratory study was conducted with responses from n = 164 midwives (43.1% response rate) working in a public tertiary maternity hospital in Western Australia. The survey included items measuring confidence; method and frequency of practice. Open-ended questions captured qualitative data. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics for quantitative data and content analysis for qualitative data., Findings: There was a significant association between age, years of clinical experience (p = 0.001) and work setting (p = 0.032) on the confidence to provide education on sexual activity. Most (92.1%) midwives indicated that they wanted further education. Lack of time, knowledge and language barriers were key factors preventing education., Discussion: Midwives' provision of education to women is essential for improving health literacy and health outcomes. Results reveal the necessity to include sexual and reproductive health education in entry to registration courses and the importance of continuing professional development., Conclusion: Evidence of midwives' confidence and current practices in the provision of sexual and reproductive health care offers utility for leaders and educators in midwifery to prepare and equip midwives to fulfil this important public health role., (Copyright © 2021 Australian College of Midwives. All rights reserved.)

Background: Substantial changes occurred in Australian healthcare provision during the COVID-19 pandemic to reduce the risk of infection transmission. Little is known about the impact of these changes on childbearing women., Aim: To explore and describe childbearing women's experiences of receiving maternity care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia., Methods: A qualitative exploratory design using semi-structured interviews was used. Women were recruited through social media and self-nominated to participate in an interview. Maximum variation sampling was used. Twenty-seven interviews were conducted with women from across Australia. Data was analysed thematically., Findings: Three primary themes and nine sub-themes emerged: 'navigating a changing health system' (coping with constant change, altered access to care, dealing with physical distancing restrictions, and missing care), 'desiring choice and control' (experiencing poor communication, making hard decisions, and considering alternate models of care), and 'experiencing infection prevention measures' (minimising the risk of exposure and changing care plans to minimise infection risk)., Discussion: The substantial changes in care delivery for pregnant and postpartum women during the pandemic appear to have reduced woman-centred care. In most cases, care was perceived as impersonal and incomplete, resulting in a very different experience than expected; consequences included missing care. The presence of a known care provider improved women's sense of communication, choice, and control., Conclusion: This study provides unique insight into the experiences of childbearing women across Australia. The importance of respectful woman-centred care cannot be forgotten during a pandemic. The findings may inform future service planning during pandemics and disaster situations., (Copyright © 2021 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: In Australia, the provision of maternity care during the COVID-19 pandemic was significantly altered to limit transmission of the virus. Many hospitals limited face-to-face appointments to only the pregnant woman and restricted the number of support people present during labour, birth, and postnatal visits to one person. How these restrictions were experienced by partners and support persons of childbearing women are unknown., Aim: To explore the experiences of partners and support persons of women receiving maternity care during the COVID-19 pandemic., Methods: A two-phased qualitative study including an online survey and interviews. Analysis was undertaken using content analysis., Findings: Partners and support persons experienced a sense of 'missing out' from the pregnancy and maternity care experience because of changes in the provision of care during the pandemic. They reported feelings of isolation, psychological distress, and reduced bonding time with babies. Conflicting information and processes within and across maternity services contributed to feelings of uncertainty and a perceived reduction in the quality of care. Partners and support persons were negatively impacted by restrictions on maternity wards, however they also perceived these to be of benefit to women., Discussion: Many partners and support persons were negatively impacted by restrictions in maternity services during the pandemic; strategies to ensure their active involvement in maternity care are needed., Conclusion: This study offers insights from the unique perspective of partners and support people of women receiving maternity care during the pandemic. Policies and processes that exclude partners and support persons need to be reconsidered., (Copyright © 2021 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Problem: The COVID-19 pandemic has required rapid and radical changes to the way maternity care is provided in many nations across the world., Background: Midwives provide care to childbearing women across the continuum and are key members of the maternity workforce in Australia., Aim: To explore and describe midwives' experiences of providing maternity care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia., Methods: A two-phased cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted. Data were collected through an online survey and semi-structured interviews between May-June 2020., Findings: Six hundred and twenty midwives responded to the online survey. Many reported a move to telehealth appointments. For labour care, 70% of midwives reported women had limited support; 77% indicated postnatal visiting was impacted. Five main themes were derived from the qualitative data including: coping with rapid and radical changes, challenges to woman-centred care, managing professional resilience, addressing personal and professional challenges, and looking ahead., Discussion: Restrictions applied to women's choices, impacted midwives' ability to provide woman-centred care, which resulted in stress and anxiety for midwives. Professional resilience was supported through collaborative relationships and working in continuity models. Midwives revealed 'silver linings' experienced in providing care during the pandemic., Conclusion: Findings provide valuable evidence to understand the impact on midwives who have provided care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Knowledge will be useful for health leaders and policy makers as they consider ways to continue care during the pandemic and support the essential midwifery workforce. Recommendations are presented to improve preparedness for future pandemics., (Copyright © 2021 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to multiple changes in maternity services worldwide. Systems rapidly adapted to meet public health requirements aimed at preventing transmission of SARS-CoV-2, including quarantine procedures, travel restrictions, border closures, physical distancing and "stay-at-home" orders. Although these changes have impacted all stakeholders in maternity services, arguably the women at the center of this care have been most affected. This study aimed to explore women's experiences of receiving maternity care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia., Methods: A national cross-sectional online survey, including fixed choice and open-ended questions, was conducted during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia; pregnant and postnatal women were recruited through social media networks., Results: The survey was completed by 3364 women. Women felt distressed and alone due to rapid changes to their maternity care. Limited face-to-face contact with health practitioners and altered models of care often required women to accommodate significant changes and to coordinate their own care. Women felt that they were often "doing it alone," due to public health restrictions on support people and visitors, both within and outside health services. Women described some benefits of visitor restrictions, such as, more time for rest, breastfeeding establishment, and bonding with their baby., Conclusions: This large nationwide Australian study provides unique data on women's experiences of receiving maternity care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lessons learned provide an opportunity to rebuild and reshape the maternity sector to best meet the needs of women and their families during current and future public health crises., (© 2021 The Authors. Birth published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objectives: Explore what influenced women's decision to exclusively formula feed, and their experiences with formula feeding within a maternity hospital environment., Design: This mixed methods study used a cross-sectional exploratory survey design. Short surveys were administered by telephone in the postpartum period. Content analysis revealed common themes for responses to open-ended questions on what influenced women's choice and experience with formula feeding. Descriptive statistics were used for demographic characteristics, and frequencies conducted on some themes., Participants and Setting: English-speaking women who chose to exclusively formula feed, and attended a tertiary maternity hospital in Australia were invited to participate; 102 women were interviewed., Findings: Themes that influenced women to choose exclusive formula feeding were: 'Previous breastfeeding challenges', 'social and societal issues' including convenience, comfort, and trust in formula, and 'maternal health' including medical issues and medications, breast physiology and mental health. Themes from the formula feeding experience in hospital were: 'Supportive' elements such as midwifery care, convenience, and resources, and 'hindering' elements such as a perceived breastfeeding agenda and systemic barriers., Key Conclusions and Implications for Practice: Previous breastfeeding difficulties were a common influence on exclusive formula feeding in subsequent pregnancies, highlighting the importance of adequate support during the primary lactation/infant feeding experience. Greater comfort and confidence levels with formula feeding and a sense of trust in formula were also influential. Some maternal medications, conditions, or physiological circumstances were perceived by women as impacting breastfeeding or breastmilk, signposting the importance of antenatal screening and assessment to support women's options and decisions regarding infant feeding. A perception of professional and organisational preferences for breastfeeding over formula feeding contributed to some women feeling judged for their choice. This reminds midwives to consider the complex intersection of factors that influence infant feeding decisions and ensure all mothers are respected and fully supported., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None declared by all authors., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Introduction: Vaccination against COVID-19 is a key global public health strategy. Health professionals including midwives and doctors support and influence vaccination uptake by childbearing women. There is currently no evidence regarding the COVID-19 vaccination perceptions and intentions of those who receive or provide maternity care in Australia. The aim of this study was to address this gap in knowledge and explore the perceptions and intentions regarding COVID-19 vaccination from consumers and providers of maternity care in Australia., Methods: A national cross-sectional online study conducted in early 2021 in Australia, a country that has had a very low number of COVID-19 cases and deaths. Recruitment was undertaken through parenting and health professional social media sites and professional college distribution lists. A total of 853 completed responses, from women (n = 326), maternity care providers including doctors (n = 58), midwives (n = 391) and midwifery students (n = 78)., Findings: Personal intention to be vaccinated ranged from 48-89% with doctors most likely and women least likely. Doctors and midwifery students were significantly more likely to recommend the vaccine to pregnant women in their care than midwives (p<0.001). Fewer doctors (2%) felt that women should wait until breastfeeding had concluded before being vaccinated compared with 24% of midwives and 21% of midwifery students (p<0.001). More than half of the midwives (53%) had concerns about the COVID-19 vaccine for the women in their care compared with 35% of doctors and 46% of midwifery students. Despite national guidelines recommending vaccination of breastfeeding women, 54% of practitioners were unlikely to recommend vaccination for this group., Conclusion: This is the first study to explore the perceptions and intentions regarding COVID-19 vaccination from the perspective of those who receive and provide maternity care in Australia. Findings have utility to support targeted public health messaging for these and other cohorts., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Aim: To describe nurses' and midwives' social media use, knowledge, attitudes and information needs, in the context of e-professionalism. A secondary aim was to identify any relationship between these variables and age, or professional role., Background: Midwives and nurses are viewed by the public as trusted professionals. On social media, the boundary between professional and personal identities can be blurred. Previous research has explored how student nurses navigate professional behaviour online, or e-professionalism. However, confusion persists amongst established nurses and midwives, despite the policies which guide and regulate their online conduct., Design: A cross-sectional designwas applied. The STROBE guideline informed reporting of the findings., Methods: A validated survey tool was modified to the study setting. Responses to 17 survey items were analysed using Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Qualitative content analysis was conducted on responses to two open-ended questions., Results: In total, 311 nurses and midwives from one Western Australian tertiary hospital participated between August 2019 and February 2020. Social media use was widespread (97.4%, n = 299). Associations were identified between age group and eight survey items assessing social media use, knowledge and attitudes. No associations were identified between professional role and social media use, knowledge and attitudes. Content analysis revealed five themes: Maintaining professional boundaries; Avoidance; Protecting self; Responsibilities and consequences; and Social media as a tool., Conclusions: Midwives and nurses in this study approached social media with caution yet many were curious about its potential. If midwives and nurses are to be held accountable to social media policies and use the benefits social media affords, they must be supported to evolve into proficient users by educators and policy makers., Tweetable Abstract: Nurses and midwives must be supported through policy and education to embrace social media as a tool of the future., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Woman-centred care is recognised as a fundamental construct of midwifery practice yet to date, there has been no validated tool available to measure it. This study aims to develop and test a self-report tool to measure woman-centred care in midwives., Methods: A staged approach was used for tool development including deductive methods to generate items, testing content validity with a group of experts, and psychometrically testing the instrument with a sample drawn from the target audience. The draft 58 item tool was distributed in an online survey using professional networks in Australia and New Zealand. Testing included item analysis, principal components analysis with direct oblimin rotation and subscale analysis, and internal consistency reliability., Results: In total, 319 surveys were returned. Analysis revealed five factors explaining 47.6% of variance. Items were reduced to 40. Internal consistency (.92) was high but varied across factors. Factors reflected the extent to which a midwife meets the woman's unique needs; balances the woman's needs within the context of the maternity service; ensures midwifery philosophy underpins practice; uses evidence to inform collaborative practice; and works in partnership with the woman., Conclusion: The Woman-Centred Care Scale-Midwife Self Report is the first step in developing a valid and reliable tool to enable midwives to self-assess their woman-centredness. Further research in alternate populations and refinement is warranted., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Substantial public health measures occurred in Australian society during the COVID-19 pandemic to reduce the risk of community transmission. Little was known about the impact of these changes on childbearing women., Aim: To describe childbearing women's experiences of becoming a mother during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia., Methods: A qualitative exploratory design using semi-structured interviews was used. Women were recruited through social media and self-nominated to participate in an interview. Maximum variation sampling was used. A total of 27 interviews were conducted with women across Australia. Data were analysed thematically., Findings: The thematic analysis resulted in four primary themes and ten sub-themes. The themes were 'going it alone - having a baby was an isolating experience' ('receiving maternity care alone', 'dealing with government restrictions', and 'desiring social support'), 'advocating for self or others' ('seeking reliable information', 'valuing peersupport', and 'having to be resourceful'), 'finding a way through' ('a changed experience for all', 'managing stress and anxiety', 'requiring constant adjustments', and 'managing fear mongering'), and 'keeping safe'., Conclusion: Becoming a mother during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia was a profound experience for the women. Following the public health initiatives which resulted in physical distancing restrictions, isolation, and the need to provide and receive social and peer support were common experiences. Whilst public health initiatives are implemented to keep people safe, the social and emotional toll on childbearing women should be considered by healthcare professionals. Childbearing women need to be safe but also require support and reassurance., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Not applicable., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic meant rapid changes to Australian maternity services. All maternity services have undertaken significant changes in relation to policies, service delivery and practices and increased use of personal protective equipment., Aims: The aim of this study was to explore and describe doctors' experiences of providing maternity care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia., Methods: A national online survey followed by semi-structured interviews with a cohort of participants was conducted during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia (May-June 2020). Participants were recruited through social media networks. Eighty-six doctors completed the survey, and eight were interviewed., Results: Almost all doctors reported rapid development of new guidelines and major changes to health service delivery. Professional colleges were the main source of new information about COVID-19. Most (89%) doctors felt sufficiently informed to care for women with COVID-19. Less than half of doctors felt changes would be temporary. Doctors described workforce disruptions with associated personal and professional impacts. The ability to access and process up-to-date, evidence-based information was perceived as important. Doctors acknowledged that altered models of care had increased pregnant women's anxiety and uncertainty. All doctors described silver linings from sector changes., Conclusions: This study provides unique insights into doctors' experiences of providing maternity care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. Findings have immediate relevance to the maternity sector now and into the future. Lessons learnt provide an opportunity to reshape the maternity sector to better prepare for future public health crises., (© 2021 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.)

Background: No evidence was identified in relation to the downward titration/cessation of intravenous oxytocin post spontaneous vaginal birth, in the absence of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH); suggesting clinicians' management is based on personal preference in the absence of evidence., Aim: To determine the proportion of induced women with a spontaneous vaginal birth and PPH, when intravenous oxytocin was utilised intrapartum and ceased 15, 30 or 60minutes post birth., Methods: This three armed pilot randomised controlled trial, was undertaken on the Birth Suite of an Australian tertiary obstetric hospital. Incidence of PPH was assessed using univariable and adjusted logistic regression, which compared the effect of titrating intravenous oxytocin post birth on the likelihood of PPH, relative to the 15minute titration group., Findings: Postpartum haemorrhage occurred in 26% (30 of 115), 20% (23 of 116), and 22% (30 of 134) of women randomised to a 15, 30 and 60minute titration time post birth, with no statistically significant differences between groups., Conclusion: There was no difference in the incidence of PPH between the three groups. Therefore, we question the benefit of delaying cessation of intravenous oxytocin for 60minutes post birth. Further investigation in this cohort is recommended, to compare the incidence of PPH when intravenous oxytocin is ceased either immediately, or 30minutes post birth. This research is warranted, as an evidence-based framework is lacking, to guide midwives globally in relation to their management of intravenous oxytocin post an induced spontaneous vaginal birth, in the absence of PPH., (Copyright © 2020 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Much evidence around public breastfeeding does not reflect experiences of the key stakeholder, the breastfeeding woman, and focuses upon the audience. Selective evidence has explored breastfeeding experiences revealing challenges with public breastfeeding as a serendipitous finding. Although women's experiences have been explored in specific contexts, insight into commonalities reflective of an international perspective is unknown., Objective: to explore, review and synthesise published literature on women's experience with public breastfeeding., Methods: An integrative review allows inclusion of findings beyond empirical evidence. Whittemore and Knafl's approach was used to capture and analyse evidence from varied sources to provide understanding of a phenomenon from diverse methodologies. PubMed, Medline, Ovid emBase, Scopus, Science Direct, the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature and PsychINFO were searched. Inclusion criteria included publications in English after 2005 offering descriptions of women's experiences. Data evaluation included assessment of literature quality. A constant comparison approach involved comparing, analysing and drawing similar concepts into themes., Findings: Integration of women's experience with public breastfeeding from 27 publications covering 12 countries revealed two key themes, what women shared as 'enhancing' and 'challenging'. Challenges included four subthemes: 'drawing attention', 'sexualisation of breasts', 'awareness of others' discomfort', and 'efforts not to be seen'. Enhancing incorporated subthemes: 'supportive audience' and 'confidence'., Conclusion: Challenges confirm an international commonality that women encounter during public breastfeeding suggesting a multilayered approach addressing community and societal behaviours is required. Insight to enhance public breastfeeding experiences offers direction to improve support., (Copyright © 2020 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The global COVID-19 pandemic has radically changed the way health care is delivered in many countries around the world. Evidence on the experience of those receiving or providing maternity care is important to guide practice through this challenging time., Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Australia. Five key stakeholder cohorts were included to explore and compare the experiences of those receiving or providing care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Women, their partners, midwives, medical practitioners and midwifery students who had received or provided maternity care from March 2020 onwards in Australia were recruited via social media and invited to participate in an online survey released between 13th May and 24th June 2020; a total of 3701 completed responses were received., Findings: While anxiety related to COVID-19 was high among all five cohorts, there were statistically significant differences between the responses from each cohort for most survey items. Women were more likely to indicate concern about their own and family's health and safety in relation to COVID-19 whereas midwives, doctors and midwifery students were more likely to be concerned about occupational exposure to COVID-19 through working in a health setting than those receiving care through attending these environments. Midwifery students and women's partners were more likely to respond that they felt isolated because of the changes to the way care was provided. Despite concerns about care received or provided not meeting expectations, most respondents were satisfied with the quality of care provided, although midwives and midwifery students were less likely to agree., Conclusion: This paper provides a unique exploration and comparison of experiences of receiving and providing maternity care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. Findings are useful to support further service changes and future service redesign. New evidence provided offers unique insight into key stakeholders' experiences of the rapid changes to health services., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

The impact of COVID-19 on midwifery students is anticipated to be multi-faceted. Our aim was to explore Australian midwifery students' experiences of providing maternity care during the COVID-19 pandemic. In a cross-sectional study 147 students were recruited through social media. Data were collected through an online survey and semi-structured interviews. Surveys were analysed using descriptive statistics; interviews and open text responses were interpreted through qualitative analysis. Findings revealed students found communication from hospitals and universities to be confusing, inconsistent and they relied on mass media and each other to remain updated. Moving to online learning and being isolated from peers made learning difficult. During clinical placements, students felt expendable in terms of their value and contribution, reflected in essential equipment such as personal protective equipment not always being available to them. Witnessing perceived compromised midwifery care increased students' emotional burden, while personal household responsibilities and financial concerns were problematic. One silver lining witnessed was women's appreciation of an improved 'babymoon', with fewer visitors, allowing uninterrupted time to establish breastfeeding and connection with their baby. Findings may guide management of midwifery education during future pandemics or health crises for universities and hospitals., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To explore and describe the preferred model of practice and first job decisions of final stage midwifery students from three Western Australian universities., Design: Qualitative descriptive., Setting: Three Western Australian (WA) universities offering courses leading to registration as a midwife., Participants: Twenty-seven midwifery students from undergraduate and postgraduate (pre-registration) courses., Methods: Data were collected from recorded interviews and focus groups. Thematic analysis of interview transcripts was used to identify commonalities. Data saturation guided when recruitment ceased and final sample size was achieved., Findings: Participants' preferred model of maternity care was influenced by learning about and witnessing both autonomous midwifery practice and collaborative care during their studies. The greatest influence was clinical experience, with most preferring a continuity of midwifery model (CoM) but first consolidating their practice in a public hospital. Most students reported that they would not choose a private hospital as their first option. Work/life balance was also considered, with some accepting that family commitments and a need to work close to home may prevent them from choosing a CoM model., Conclusion and Implications: Although many Australian midwifery students start their midwifery course with preconceived ideology of their eventual workplace, the influences of their educators, clinical placement environment, preceptors and continuity of care experience relationships with women helped determine their final direction. To provide students with the experiences to become woman-centred autonomous practitioners it is important for universities and all maternity care providers to carefully consider their responsibility in how they influence midwifery students in education and practice., (Copyright © 2020 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To explore and describe what student midwives, enrolled in one Western Australian (WA) university, had witnessed, learned and experienced regarding the concept of being 'with woman'., Design: A qualitative descriptive design was chosen., Setting: A university in Perth, Western Australia., Participants: Nineteen student midwives from an undergraduate and a post graduate midwifery course., Methods: Data were collected from audio-recorded interviews. Thematic analysis of interview transcripts was used to identify commonalities of perceptions and experiences of being 'with woman' for students. Data saturation guided when recruitment ceased and final sample size was achieved., Findings: Student interviews revealed that when considering the concept of being 'with woman' students were able to give descriptors of what they interpreted the meaning of being 'with woman' to be. They also described factors that impacted their learning of how to be 'with woman'. Included in their descriptors were that being 'with woman' enables informed choice, it creates a connection, it means the woman is at the centre of care and that it can occur in all contexts. The factors that impacted their learning of how to be 'with woman' were the importance of positive midwife role models, that providing continuity of care models accelerate learning, that the student role and workload can impact their perceived ability to be with woman and that they are aware it takes time to learn how to be 'with woman'., Conclusion and Implications: The art and skills of being 'with woman' are central to midwifery practice; students in this study were able to demonstrate understanding of the concept and also highlight factors that influence their learning of how to be 'with woman'. Findings can inform how the phenomenon of being 'with woman' can be intentionally introduced into midwifery programs, with particular emphasis on positive midwifery role models, realistic student workload and recognition of the value of the Continuity of Care Experience., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None declared., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)