Search

BackgroundSpinal cord injury is a complex chronic health condition that requires individuals to actively self-manage. Therefore, an evidence-based, self-management app would be of value to support individuals with spinal cord injury in the prevention of pressure injuries. ObjectiveThe main objectives of this study were to (1) establish a co-design approach for developing a high-fidelity prototype app for the self-management of individuals with spinal cord injury, (2) design the prototype that resulted from this process, and (3) conduct the first usability assessment of the prototype app. MethodsWe adopted a co-design approach to develop an evidence-based app prototype. Starting from a preliminary content model (based on clinical guidelines for the prevention of pressure injuries) and three research-based user personas, we conducted an ideation workshop involving individuals with spinal cord injury and health care professionals. The ideation workshop formed the basis for two consecutive design sprints. The result of this co-design phase was an interactive app prototype. The prototype was evaluated in two rounds of usability testing (N=4 and N=15, respectively) using a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. ResultsThe co-design process resulted in a high-fidelity prototype with two key components: a self-management component and a communication component. The final prototype included a combination of features to support individuals with spinal cord injury in the prevention of pressure injuries, namely a smart camera, pressure injury diary, expert consultation, reminders, and knowledge repository. Findings of the usability testing showed that most participants navigated the app fluently with little back and forth navigation and were able to successfully complete a set of assigned tasks. These positive results are supported by the average system usability score achieved (78.5/100; range 47.5-95.0) and our qualitative analysis of the semistructured interviews. Despite an overall positive evaluation of the app prototype, we identified areas for improvement (eg, inclusion of a search function). ConclusionsIndividuals with spinal cord injury often need to navigate competing interests and priorities, paired with uncertainty about the accuracy and relevance of clinical recommendations. Understanding what matters to individuals with spinal cord injury can help guide the design of behavioral interventions that are useful and acceptable to these individuals in their daily lives. This study shows that involving individuals with spinal cord injury and health care professionals in co-designing a self-management app can foster knowledge cocreation at the intersection of lived experience, medical expertise, and technical solutions.

BackgroundTechnological solutions, particularly mobile health (mHealth), have been shown to be potentially viable approaches for sustaining individuals’ self-management of chronic health conditions. Theory-based interventions are more successful, as evidence-based information is an essential prerequisite for appropriate self-management. However, several reviews have shown that many existing mobile apps fail to be either theoretically grounded or based on evidence. Although some authors have attempted to address these two issues by focusing on the design and development processes of apps, concrete efforts to systematically select evidence-based content are scant. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to present a procedure for the participatory identification of evidence-based content to ground the development of a self-management app. MethodsTo illustrate the procedure, we focused on the prevention and management of pressure injuries (PIs) in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). The procedure involves the following three steps: (1) identification of existing evidence through review and synthesis of existing recommendations on the prevention and self-management of PIs in SCI; (2) a consensus meeting with experts from the field of SCI and individuals with SCI to select the recommendations that are relevant and applicable to community-dwelling individuals in their daily lives; and (3) consolidation of the results of the study. ResultsIn this case study, at the end of the three-step procedure, the content for an mHealth intervention was selected in the form of 98 recommendations. ConclusionsThis study describes a procedure for the participatory identification and selection of disease-specific evidence and professional best practices to inform self-management interventions. This procedure might be especially useful in cases of complex chronic health conditions, as every recommendation in these cases needs to be evaluated and considered in light of all other self-management requirements. Hence, the agreement of experts and affected individuals is essential to ensure the selection of evidence-based content that is considered to be relevant and applicable.

Health systems rely on the unpaid work of family caregivers. Nevertheless, demographic changes suggest a shortage of caregivers in the near future, which can constrain the long‐term care policy in many countries. In order to find ways to support family caregivers, a primary effort would be to estimate how much their work is worth. This paper estimates the economic value of long‐term family caregivers and how these costs would be shared by the health system, the social insurances and the cared‐for person in the absence of informal caregivers. We use data of 717 family caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) in Switzerland. We implemented the proxy‐good method and estimated the market value of their work if performed by professional caregivers. Our results show that family caregivers in the sample spent an average of 27 hr per week caring for a relative for almost 12 years. This work, if undertaken by professional home care, has a market value of CHF 62,732 (EUR 56,455) per year. In the absence of family caregivers, these costs should be financed by the health insurances (47%), by the cared‐for person (24%) and by the social insurances (29%). It is in the best interest of the cared‐for person and of the healthcare and social systems to keep a sustained supply of family caregivers. One option is finding ways to recognise and compensate them for their work and make it less cumbersome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To identify the coping strategies used by family caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) in Switzerland in order to develop tailored support programs. Purposive sample of >18 years participants, speaking an official Swiss language fluently, being family caregivers of persons with SCI for at least 4 years, and perceiving either a high or low burden in relation to caregiving. Data were collected through face-to-face semi-structured interviews (N = 22). Thematic analysis was performed. Four main coping strategies were identified: reappraisal, active acceptance, setting limits to the caregiver role, and seeking support. These strategies can be used one at a time or combined, and at different times of a caregiver pathway. Our analysis highlighted that caregivers need skills to implement these strategies (e.g., self-evaluation skills). Caregivers of persons with SCI develop cognitive coping strategies to make sense of the situation and establish a "new normal" and problem-focused coping strategies to deal with their new tasks and role. These strategies do not seem to be typical only of SCI caregivers. Hence, interventions that worked for caregivers in other fields could be adapted. Rehabilitation centers should systematically integrate programs targeted to caregivers into their offerings. Healthcare systems need to develop educational and support measures for both persons with a health condition and their caregivers. Caregivers should become long-term partners in rehabilitation and a regular and structured needs assessment should be offered. Interventions that worked for caregivers in other fields can be adapted to support also caregivers in SCI. Educational and support programs dedicated to caregivers should teach not only how to perform caregiving tasks but also how to balance between responding to the care recipient's needs and their own needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]