Search

Chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) is a primary immunodeficiency due to a deficiency in one of the subunits of the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase complex. CGD patients are characterized by an increased susceptibility to bacterial and fungal infections, and to granuloma formation due to the excessive inflammatory responses. Several gene therapy approaches with lentiviral vectors have been proposed but there is a lack of in vivodata on the ability to control infections and inflammation. We set up a mouse model of acute infection that closely mimic the airway infection in CGD patients. It involved an intratracheal injection of a methicillin-sensitive reference strain of S. aureus. Gene therapy, with hematopoietic stem cells transduced with regulated lentiviral vectors, restored the functional activity of NADPH oxidase complex (with 20–98% of dihydrorhodamine positive granulocytes and monocytes) and saved mice from death caused by S. aureus, significantly reducing the bacterial load and lung damage, similarly to WT mice even at low vector copy number. When challenged, gene therapy-treated XCGD mice showed correction of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokine imbalance at levels that were comparable to WT. Examined together, our results support the clinical development of gene therapy protocols using lentiviral vectors for the protection against infections and inflammation.

The long-term expression and the ability of a therapeutic gene to confer survival advantage to transduced cells are mandatory requirements for successful anti-HIV gene therapy. In this context, we developed lentiviral vectors (LVs) expressing the F12–viral infectivity factor (Vif) derivative Chim3. We recently showed that Chim3 inhibits HIV-1 replication in primary cells by both blocking the accumulation of retrotranscripts, independently of either human APOBEC3G (hA3G) or Vif, and by preserving the antiviral function of hA3G. These results were predictive of long-lasting survival of Chim3+cells after HIV-1 infection. Furthermore, Vif, like Vpr, deregulates cell-cycle progression by inducing a delay in G2phase. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the role of Chim3 on both cell survival and cell-cycle regulation after HIV-1 infection. Here, we provide evidence that infected Chim3+T cells prevail over either mock- or empty-LV engineered cells, show reduced G2accumulation, and, as a consequence, ultimately extend their lifespan. Based on these findings, Chim3 rightly belongs to the most efficacious class of antiviral genes. In conclusion, Chim3 usage in anti-HIV gene therapy based on hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) modification has to be considered as a promising therapeutic intervention to eventually cope with HIV-1 infection.

The viral infectivity factor (Vif) is essential for HIV-1 infectivity and hence is an ideal target for promising anti–HIV-1/AIDS gene therapy. We previously demonstrated that F12-Vif mutant inhibits HIV-1 replication in CD4+T lymphocytes. Despite macrophage relevance to HIV-1 pathogenesis, most gene therapy studies do not investigate macrophages because of their natural resistance to genetic manipulation. Here, we confirm the F12-Vif antiviral activity also in macrophages differentiated in vitro from transduced CD34+human stem cells (HSCs). Moreover, we identified the 126- to 170-amino-acid region in the C-terminal half of F12-Vif as responsible for its antiviral function. Indeed, Chim3 protein, containing this 45-amino-acid region embedded in a WT-Vif backbone, is as lethal as F12-Vif against HIV-1. Of major relevance, we demonstrated a dual mechanism of action for Chim3. First, Chim3 functions as a transdominant factor that preserves the antiviral function of the natural restriction factor APOBEC3G (hA3G). Second, Chim3 blocks the early HIV-1 retrotranscript accumulation and thereby HIV-1 DNA integration regardless of the presence of WT-Vif and hA3G. In conclusion, by impairing the early steps of HIV-1 life cycle, Chim3 conceivably endows engineered cells with survival advantage, which is required for the efficient immune reconstitution of patients living with HIV/AIDS.

Human T-cell leukemia–lymphoma virus (HTLV) type-2 can induce the survival and proliferation of CD34+TF-1 cells deprived of interleukin (IL)-3. This effect did not require productive infection and occurred when HTLV-2 was produced from T cells (CMo), but not from B cells (BMo), unless the latter virus was complexed with anti–HLA-DR monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Cellular and molecular mechanisms triggered by HTLV-2 interaction with TF-1 cells were here investigated. Activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 5 protein occurred in TF-1 cells incubated either with IL-3 or with HTLV-2/CMo; in addition the virus, but not IL-3, activated STAT1. The effect of HTLV-2 required several hours, suggesting dependence on the induction of cellular factors. By screening a panel of secreted factors, granulocyte macrophage–colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interferon (IFN)-γ, and stem cell factor (SCF) were found induced by HTLV-2 in TF-1 cells. Of note is the fact that these molecules induce a variety of biologic effects through the activation of STAT proteins, including STAT1 and STAT5. Neutralization experiments indicated that GM-CSF and IFN-γ, but not SCF, were responsible for HTLV-2–induced STAT activation, whereas anti–GM-CSF antibodies greatly inhibited TF-1 cell proliferation. Finally, incubation of BMo virus with anti–HLA-DR mAb rescued TF-1 cell survival in the absence of IL-3. Thus, HTLV-2 interaction with CD34+precursor cells may lead to the expression of cytokines that, by inducing autocrine activation of STATs, may influence the host's regenerative capacity and immune response to HTLV-2 and to other infectious agents.

Deletion of the nefgene results in viral attenuation and confers protection against challenge with wild-type simian immunodeficiency virus in macaques. Regarding HIV-1 infection, a few long-term nonprogressors (LTNP) with nefdeletions have been described. In this study, the nefgenes of a group of seven LTNP and eight progressors, all belonging to the same cohort of infected hemophiliacs, were analyzed by cloning and sequencing from both virion RNA and peripheral blood mononuclear cell-associated proviral DNA. Defective nefsequences coexisted with full-length nefopen reading frames in five of seven LTNP and two of eight progressors. The proportion of disrupted nefsequences within each individual was significantly higher in LTNP (ranging from 10 to 63%) than in progressors (ranging from 9 to 21%) (P= 0.013). Moreover, in-frame small deletions predicting to encode Nef were found in all RNA- and DNA-derived clones from one LTNP and four progressors. A chimeric virus in which the nefgene of NL4.3 was substituted with the nefallele containing the deletion of two alanines at position 49–50 found in two progressors showed a defective replicative capacity compared to NL4.3 virus. In summary, hemophiliacs with either progressing or nonprogressing HIV-1 infection are characterized by the presence of defective nefvariants.

ABSTRACTThe human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replicates in activated CD4+T lymphocytes. However, only CD4+Th2 and Th0, but not Th1, CD4+T-cell clones have been reported to efficiently support HIV-1 replication. This dichotomous pattern was further investigated in the present study in Th1, Th2, or Th0 cell lines derived from umbilical human cord blood and in T-cell clones obtained from the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of healthy adults. Both primary and laboratory-adapted HIV-1 strains with CCR5 as the exclusive entry coreceptor (R5 viruses) efficiently replicated in Th1, Th2, and Th0 cells. In sharp contrast, CXCR4-dependent (X4) viruses poorly replicated in both polarized and unpolarized CD4+T cells, including adults’ PBMC infected several days after mitogenic stimulation. Unlike the X4 HIV-1NL4-3, a chimera in which the envgene had been replaced with that of the R5 HIV-1NL(AD8), efficiently replicated in both Th1 and Th2 cells. This X4-dependent restriction of HIV replication was not explained by either the absence of functional CXCR4 on the cell surface or by the inefficient viral entry and reverse transcription. T-cell receptor stimulation by anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies fully rescued X4 HIV-1 replication in both Th1 and Th2 cells, whereas it did not alter the extent and kinetics of R5 HIV-1 spreading. Thus, R5 HIVs show a replicative advantage in comparison to X4 viruses in their ability to efficiently propagate among suboptimally activated T lymphocytes, regardless of their polarized or unpolarized functional profiles. This observation may help to explain the absolute predominance of R5 HIVs over X4 viruses observed after viral transmission and during early-stage disease.