Search

SCAN, an online survey, measured access to diagnosis, treatments and monitoring of neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients globally. Between September and November 2019, NET patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) completed an online, semi‐standardized survey with 54 patient questions and 33 HCP questions. A total of 2359 patients with NETs and 436 HCPs responded. Misdiagnosis was common (44% [1043/2359]). Mean time to diagnosis was 4.8 years (standard deviation [SD], 6.2). Compared with global figures (60% [1407/2359]), the availability of 68Ga‐DOTA positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) was significantly lower in Asia (45% [126/280]) and higher in Oceania (86% [171/200]). HCPs reported that 68Ga‐DOTA PET/CT was free/affordable to fewer patients in Emerging and Developing Economies (EDE) than Advanced Economies (AE; 17% [26/150] and 59% [84/142], respectively). Compared with global data (52% [1234/2359]), patient‐reported availability of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) was significantly lower in Asia (31% [88/280]) and higher in Oceania (61% [122/200]). Significant differences were observed in average annual NET specialist costs between AE and EDE ($1081 and $2915, respectively). Compared with AE, patients in EDE traveled further for NET specialists (1032 [SD, 1578] and 181 [SD, 496] km, respectively). Patients and HCPs both recommended referral to HCPs that were more knowledgeable in the field of NETs and had better access to NET experts/specialist centers. National care pathways, enhancing HCP NET knowledge and ensuring effective diagnostics and access to appropriate treatments are crucial to improving patient survival and NET care worldwide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Due to the increasing incidence and prevalence of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), there is a need to assess any gaps in awareness and care. A survey was undertaken in 2017 to identify perceived unmet needs from the perspectives of patients/families, patient advocates and health care professionals (HCPs). The survey consisted of 33–37 questions (depending on type of respondent) across four areas: information, care, treatments and research. In total, 443 participants from 26 countries responded: 338 patients/families, 35 advocates and 70 HCPs. Perceived unmet needs regarding provision of information at diagnosis differed between groups. While 59% of HCPs believed they provided sufficient information, informational needs were mostly/fully met for only 30% of patients and 18% of advocates. Additionally, 91% of patients and 97% of advocates felt that patients had to search for information themselves. Availability of Gallium‐68‐Dotatate PET/CT scan was limited for the majority of patients (patients: 73%; advocates: 85%; HCP: 86%), as was access to treatments, particularly peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (patients: 42%; advocates: 95%; HCPs: 77%). All groups felt that standards of care, including psychological needs and diagnosis of mental health, were not fully met. Although about two‐thirds of patients were managed by a multidisciplinary team, 14% of patients reportedly did not have enough contact. All groups supported more patient involvement in research; patients and advocates prioritized improvement in diagnosis and HCPs focused on clinical trials. This survey revealed significant unmet needs but differing perceptions regarding these among the groups. There is a need for investigation and collaboration to improve standards of care for NET patients. What's new? Even though the incidence of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has been rising worldwide, the current management of patients varies considerably, potentially leaving many with suboptimal care. An international survey was carried out in 2017 to investigate unmet needs in the NET patient community. The survey revealed that patients perceive numerous unmet needs in key areas including provision of information, diagnostics and treatment access, care standards, and research involvement. While healthcare professionals were aware of these gaps, they generally underestimated their magnitude. Patients and healthcare professionals need to work together to improve the lives and prospects of the increasing numbers of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) incidence is rising internationally. We aimed to evaluate the epidemiology of NEN in England and examine changes in survival over time., Methods: A retrospective, population-based study using nationally representative data between 1995 and 2018 from the National Cancer Registry and Analysis Service (NCRAS) in England was conducted on 63,949 tumours. Age-standardized incidence was calculated using Office for National Statistics (ONS) data. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Multivariable analysis was performed using an accelerated failure time model., Findings: Of 63,949 cases, 50.5% (32,309) were female. Age-adjusted incidence increased 3.7-fold between 1995 and 2018 from 2.35 to 8.61 per 100,000. In 2018, highest incidence occurred in lung (1.47 per 100,000), small intestine (1.46 per 100,000), pancreas (1.00 per 100,000) and appendix (0.95 per 100,000). In multivariable analysis, age, sex, morphology, stage, site and deprivation were independent predictors of survival ( p  < 0.001). Survival of the entire cohort, and by primary site, is improving over time., Interpretation: NEN incidence continues to rise in England with survival improving over time. Relatively high survival compared to other cancers is an issue for long-term outcomes and funding of care., Funding: Data were extracted and transferred using a grant from Neuroendocrine cancer UK., Competing Interests: JKR supervised securing funding for the grant from Neuroendocrine Cancer UK (NCUK) to process the data in the initial planning of the work. CB states that NCUK receives donation, grant and sponsorship money from patients, businesses and not-for-profit organisations. CB is a board member of the International Neuroendocrine Cancer Alliance (INCA). The other authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2022 The Authors.)

The treatment of a patient with 131I at activity over 740 mega Becquerel (MBq) must be performed in a nuclear medicine department. Isolation is stopped if the patient radiation level is less than 20 muSv/hour at one meter. As regards patients with chronic renal failure treated with hemodialysis (HD), the first HD session will eliminate the major part of the radioactivity. French regulations do not give definite recommendations for this session. However, it imposes to collect liquid and solid wastes contaminated by radioactivity. Thus, it seems necessary to collect dialysate and solid wastes and to stock them in a room dedicated to radiation decay. The risk for dialysis staff is to be contaminated by an accidental ingestion of a biologic fluid from the patient. The usual protection barriers used during the HD session are sufficient: mask, gloves, overgarments, cap. There is no risk linked to external exposure to radiations. The maximal theoretical dose received by the staff during the session is 65 muSv, while annual maximal dose for public exposed to radiations is 1000 muSv. Although the dosimetric follow-up of dialysis staff is not mandatory, the nuclear medicine department of Marseille University Hospital has decided to do it in an information perspective. The session is performed in the presence of a radiation safety technician who gives film badges and active dosimeters to the dialysis staff. He reports the dialysis staff to the nuclear safety agency (Autorité de sûreté nucléaire).