Search

Dynamin 1 is a large neuron-specific GTPase involved in the endocytosis and recycling of pre-synaptic membranes and synaptic vesicles. Mutations in the gene encoding dynamin 1 (DNM1) underlie two epileptic encephalopathy syndromes, Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome and Infantile Spasms. Mice homozygous for the Dnm1 "fitful" mutation, a non-synonymous coding variant in an alternatively spliced exon of Dnm1 (exon 10a; isoform designation: Dnm1a(Ftfl)) have an epileptic encephalopathy-like disorder including lethal early onset seizures, locomotor and neurosensory deficits. Although fitful heterozygotes have milder recurrent seizures later in life, suggesting an additive or semi-dominant mechanism, the molecular etiology must also consider the fact that Dnm1a(Ftfl) exerts a dominant negative effect on endocytosis in vitro. Another complication is that the fitful mutation induces alterations in the relative abundance of Dnm1 splice variants; mutants have a downregulation of Dnm1a and an upregulation of Dnm1b, changes which may contribute to the epileptic pathology. To examine whether Dnm1a loss of function, Dnm1a(Ftfl) dominance or compensation by Dnm1b is the most critical for severe seizures, we studied alternate isoform-specific mutant mice. Mice lacking Dnm1 exon 10a or Dnm1 exon 10b have neither spontaneous seizures nor other overt abnormalities, suggesting that in normal conditions the major role of each isoform is redundant. However, in the presence of Dnm1a(Ftfl) only exon 10a deleted mice experience severe seizures. These results reveal functional differences between Dnm1a and Dnm1b isoforms in the presence of a challenge, i.e. toxic Dnm1(Ftfl), while reinforcing its effect explicitly in this model of severe pediatric epilepsy., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In 1961, Mary Lyon first put forth the hypothesis that one X chromosome is inactivated in each cell of the female mammal. As we enter the new millennium and complete 40 years of study, the field of X-inactivation is rich with ideas and many contrasting viewpoints. This review will focus on the random form of X-inactivation and present the latest views on its mechanism. Much attention has been focused on the genetic parsing of X-chromosome counting, choice, silencing and maintenance. It is now known that counting is functionally distinct from choice and that initiation and establishment of silencing are distinct from maintenance. Since Xist's seminal discovery 10 years ago, significant progress has been made towards understanding its function. Required only for initiation and establishment, Xist must act within a narrow developmental window, but its precise mode of action remains elusive. The ongoing search for Xist RNA-binding factors and effector proteins for silencing has led to members of the macroH2A family of histone variants. Finally, the recent discovery of Tsix implicates regulation of Xist expression by an antisense mechanism. Required for choice but not counting, Tsix blocks Xist RNA accumulation and hence blocks initiation of silencing on the future active X.