Search

Key Points: Question: What is the long-term prognosis of myocarditis after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and do clinical outcomes and medical management differ from myocarditis of other origins? Finding: In this nationwide cohort study including 4635 patients hospitalized for myocarditis in France during the first 1.5 years after COVID-19 vaccination, the 558 individuals with postvaccine myocarditis had less severe cardiovascular events than those with myocarditis of other origins at 18 months of follow-up. However, affected patients, mainly healthy young men, may require medical management up to several months after hospital discharge. Meaning: These elements should be taken into account for ongoing and future mRNA vaccine recommendations. Importance: Although patients with myocarditis after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination appear to have a good prognosis near hospital discharge, their longer-term prognosis and management remain unknown. Objective: To study the cardiovascular complications of post–COVID-19 mRNA vaccination myocarditis and other types of myocarditis during an 18-month follow-up, as well as disease management based on a study of the frequency of medical procedures and drug prescriptions. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study based on the French National Health Data System, all individuals aged 12 to 49 years hospitalized for myocarditis in France between December 27, 2020, and June 30, 2022, were identified. Exposure: Individuals were categorized as having postvaccine myocarditis (within 7 days after COVID-19 mRNA vaccine), post–COVID-19 myocarditis (within 30 days of SARS-CoV-2 infection), or conventional myocarditis. Main Outcomes and Measures: The occurrence of clinical outcomes (hospital readmission for myopericarditis, other cardiovascular events, all-cause death, and a composite outcome of these events) over the 18 months following hospital admission were analyzed using weighted Cox models to standardize the comparisons with the conventional myocarditis group. Also, medical management after hospital discharge was longitudinally assessed using generalized estimated equation models. Results: In total, 4635 individuals were hospitalized for myocarditis: 558 with postvaccine myocarditis, 298 with post–COVID-19 myocarditis, and 3779 with conventional myocarditis. Patients with postvaccine myocarditis were younger than those with post–COVID-19 and conventional myocarditis (mean [SD] age of 25.9 [8.6], 31.0 [10.9], and 28.3 [9.4] years, respectively) and were more frequently men (84%, 67%, and 79%). Patients with postvaccine myocarditis had a lower standardized incidence of the composite clinical outcome than those with conventional myocarditis (32/558 vs 497/3779 events; weighted hazard ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.36-0.86]), whereas individuals with post–COVID-19 myocarditis had similar results (36/298 events; weighted hazard ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.70-1.52]). The standardized frequency of medical procedures and drugs prescribed in patients with postvaccine myocarditis or post–COVID-19 myocarditis followed a similar trend in the 18 months following hospital discharge to that of patients with conventional myocarditis. Conclusions and Relevance: Patients with post–COVID-19 mRNA vaccination myocarditis, contrary to those with post–COVID-19 myocarditis, show a lower frequency of cardiovascular complications than those with conventional myocarditis at 18 months. However, affected patients, mainly healthy young men, may require medical management up to several months after hospital discharge. This cohort study examines cardiovascular complications of postvaccine and other types of myocarditis (ie, post–COVID-19 and conventional myocarditis) during 18-month follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The main clinical features of pseudohypoparathyroidism (PHP)/inactivating parathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related protein signaling disorders (iPPSD), including parathyroid hormone (PTH) resistance, brachydactyly and short stature, develop during middle and late childhood. Very few studies have addressed hearing loss in PHP/iPPSD patients, and these studies have yielded widely divergent conclusions. The aim of our study was to assess hearing and determine the predictive factors of hearing loss in patients with PHP/iPPSD. Methods: Our retrospective cohort study was conducted between March 2019 and May 2020 in the Otolaryngology Department and the calcium phosphate reference center for rare diseases in Bicêtre Paris-Saclay Hospital, France. We retrospectively collected data from patients with PHP/iPPSDs (age, sex, genetic mutations, height, body mass index (BMI), PTH resistance, presence or absence of ectopic ossifications and brachydactyly). All patients underwent auditory investigations, including tonal and vocal audiometry. The primary outcome was the pure tone average (PTA). The PTA was compared with the norm according to the International Organization for Standardization. Hearing loss was defined as a PTA ≥ 20 db. Results: The median age of the patients was 15.6 years [9.5, 28.5]. Thirty-six patients were diagnosed with iPPSD2, and eight were diagnosed with iPPSD3. Twenty-six of them (59%) were female. Hearing impairment was confirmed in 17 patients (39%). The mean PTA and the mean SRT of the deaf ears were 40 ± 26 db and 31 ± 14 db. The mean difference in the PTA between the patients and the normal controls was 11.4 db (p = 0.00002). Short stature and the presence of ectopic ossifications were two significant predictive factors of hearing loss (p = 0.009 and p = 0.03, respectively). Sex, BMI, PTH resistance, mutation category and brachydactyly were not associated with an increased risk of hearing loss (p = 0.19, p = 0.41, p = 0.13, p = 0.50, p = 0.19, respectively). Conclusion: Our study confirmed the frequency of hearing loss in patients with PHP/iPPSD disease (prevalence = 39%). A diagnosis of PHP/iPPSD should trigger auditory investigations and follow-up, especially when short stature and/or ectopic ossifications are present. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) frequently affects women of childbearing age and pregnant women. Objective: To assess the use of MS disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) during pregnancy in France over the last decade, marked by an increasing DMTs availability. Methods: All pregnancies ended from April 2010 to December 2021 in women with MS were identified based on the nationwide Mother–Child Register EPI-MERES, built from the French National Health Data System (Système National des Données de Santé (SNDS)). Results: Of a total of 20,567 pregnancies in women with MS, 7587 were exposed to DMT. The number of DMT-exposed pregnancies markedly increased from 1079 in 2010–2012 to 2413 in 2019–2021 (+124%), especially those exposed to glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, dimethyl fumarate, and anti-CD20. Among pregnancies of women on DMT 6 months before pregnancy, 78.0% underwent DMT discontinuation and 7.6% switched DMT, generally before (33.0% and 77.0%, respectively) or during the first trimester of pregnancy (58.3% and 17.8%, respectively). DMT discontinuation decreased from 84.0% in 2010–2012 to 72.4% in 2019–2021 and was less frequent among women aged ⩾35 years and those socioeconomically disadvantaged. Conclusion: Despite MS therapeutic management adaptations to pregnancy, exposure during pregnancy to treatments whose safety profile has not yet been clearly established has increased sharply over the last decade. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Knowing the duration of effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) booster doses is essential to providing decision-makers with scientific arguments about the frequency of subsequent injections. We estimated the level of protection against COVID-19-related hospitalizations (Omicron BA.4-BA.5) over time after vaccination, accounting for breakthrough infections. Methods In this nationwide case–control study, all cases of hospitalizations for COVID-19 identified in the comprehensive French National Health Data System between June 1, 2022, and October 15, 2022, were matched with up to 10 controls by year of birth, sex, department, and an individual COVID-19 hospitalization risk score. Conditional logistic regressions were used to estimate the level of protection against COVID-19-related hospitalizations conferred by primary and booster vaccination, accounting for history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Results A total of 38 839 cases were matched to 377 653 controls; 19.2% and 9.9% were unvaccinated, respectively, while 68.2% and 77.7% had received ≥1 booster dose. Protection provided by primary vaccination reached 45% (95% CI, 42%–47%). The incremental effectiveness of booster doses ranged from 69% (95% CI, 67%–71%; ≤2 months) to 22% (95% CI, 19%–25%; ≥6 months). Specifically, the second booster provided an additional protection compared with the first ranging from 61% (95% CI, 59%–64%; ≤2 months) to 7% (95% CI, 2%–13%; ≥4 months). Previous SARS-CoV-2 infection conferred a strong, long-lasting protection (51% ≥20 months). There was no incremental effectiveness of a second booster among individuals infected since the first booster. Conclusions In the era of Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 predominance, primary vaccination still conferred protection against COVID-19 hospitalization, while booster doses provided an additional time-limited protection. The second booster had no additional protection in case of infection since the first booster. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Various body indicators are used to predict health risks. However, controversies still exist regarding the best indicators to predict CVD. Using a large number of measurements, our aim was to assess their associations with blood pressure (BP) and to identify the most relevant parameters to be used in health surveillance studies. The population included 589 students (67·2 % women) aged 20–25 years from Constantine (Algeria). Sixteen parameters were considered, including crude body measurements, ratios and body fat indicators based on bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). We used multi-adjusted linear regression models to assess the associations between body measurements and BP. According to WHO definitions, underweight, overweight-without obesity, obesity and hypertension (HT) were identified in 6·1, 18·0, 2·4 and 5·1 % of the subjects, respectively. Prevalence of HT was higher in men than in women (11·9 % v. 1·8 %; P < 0·001). In the whole sample, almost all indicators were positively associated with systolic and diastolic BP. The suprailiac skinfold had the strongest associations with systolic (β = 3·498; P < 0·001) and diastolic (β = 2·436; P < 0·001) BP, and as a whole, arm circumferences and weight were also good candidates. The currently used BMI, waist-to-hip, waist-to-height ratio and BIA indictors also predicted BP, but they did not seem to be better determinants of BP than crude anthropometric measurements. This study showed that overweight and HT were already found in the present population of young Algerian adults. Most body indicators were highly associated with BP, but simple anthropometric measurements appeared to be particularly useful to predict BP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]