Search

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority of a quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) developed by Sinovac Biotech Co., Ltd. (Sinovac, Beijing, China) by comparing its immunogenicity and safety with a comparator QIV (Vaxigrip Tetra®) in a population aged 3 years and older in Chile and the Philippines. Methods: A phase 3, non-inferiority, double-blind, randomized controlled, multicenter clinical trial was conducted in the southern hemisphere (SH) 2023 influenza season. Participants aged ≥ 3 years old with stable health were randomized 1:1 to receive either Sinovac QIV or comparator QIV. The co-primary outcomes were immunological non-inferiority for Sinovac QIV versus the comparator against each strain contained in the vaccines in terms of seroconversion rates (SCRs) and geometric mean titers (GMTs) of hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibodies 28 days after final vaccination. Results: A total of 2039 participants were vaccinated (1019 Sinovac QIV; 1020 comparator QIV). Sinovac QIV induced non-inferior immune responses to all four strains as compared to comparator QIV, with slightly higher GMTs than those of comparator QIV: GMT ratios (lower limit 95% confidence interval (CI)) were 1.8 (1.6) for A(H1N1), 1.4 (1.3) for A (H3N2), 1.3 (1.1) for B Victoria and 1.2 (1.1) for B Yamagata; observed seroconversion rate differences (lower limit 95% CI) were 9.6% (6.7) for A(H1N1), 7.0% (3.5) for A(H3N2), 2.4% (−0.03) for B Victoria and 6.8% (3.0) for B Yamagata. Adverse reactions were similar across the two groups and no vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: The immunogenicity of Sinovac QIV was non-inferior to that of the comparator QIV in these populations aged 3 years and older, and safety was comparable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A new inactivated polio vaccine made from Sabin strains (sIPV) was developed as part of the global polio eradication initiative.Methods: This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 2/3 seamless study was conducted in 2 stages. Healthy infants aged 6 weeks were randomly assigned to receive 3 doses of 1 of 4 study vaccines at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age (336 received low-, middle-, or high-dose sIPV, or conventional IPV [cIPV] in stage I, and 1086 received lot A, B, or C of the selected sIPV dose, or cIPV in stage II). The primary outcome was the seroconversion rate 4 weeks after the third vaccination.Results: In stage I, low-dose sIPV was selected as the optimal dose. In stage II, consistency among the 3 manufacturing lots of sIPV was demonstrated. The seroconversion rates for Sabin and wild strains of the 3 serotypes after the 3-dose primary series were 95.8% to 99.2% in the lot-combined sIPV group and 94.8% to 100% in the cIPV group, proving the noninferiority of sIPV compared to cIPV. No notable safety risks associated with sIPV were observed.Conclusions: Low-dose sIPV administered as a 3-dose vaccination was safe and immunogenic compared to cIPV.Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03169725. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Takeda's live attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine candidate (TAK-003) is under evaluation in a long-term clinical trial across 8 dengue-endemic countries. Previously, we have reported its efficacy and safety in both seronegative and seropositive participants and that its performance varies by serotype, with some decline in efficacy from first to second year postvaccination. This exploratory analysis provides an update with cumulative and third-year data. Methods Healthy 4–16 year olds (n = 20099) were randomized 2:1 to receive TAK-003 or placebo (0, 3 month schedule). The protocol included baseline serostatus testing of all participants and detection of all symptomatic dengue throughout the trial with a serotype specific reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Results Cumulative efficacy after 3 years was 62.0% (95% confidence interval, 56.6–66.7) against virologically confirmed dengue (VCD) and 83.6% (76.8–88.4) against hospitalized VCD. Efficacy was 54.3% (41.9–64.1) against VCD and 77.1% (58.6–87.3) against hospitalized VCD in baseline seronegatives, and 65.0% (58.9–70.1) against VCD and 86.0% (78.4–91.0) against hospitalized VCD in baseline seropositives. Efficacy against VCD during the third year declined to 44.7% (32.5–54.7), whereas efficacy against hospitalized VCD was sustained at 70.8% (49.6–83.0). Rates of serious adverse events were 2.9% in TAK-003 group and 3.5% in placebo group during the ongoing long-term follow-up (ie, second half of the 3 years following vaccination), but none were related. No important safety risks were identified. Conclusions TAK-003 was efficacious against symptomatic dengue over 3 years. Efficacy declined over time but remained robust against hospitalized dengue. A booster dose evaluation is planned. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Takeda's dengue vaccine is under evaluation in an ongoing phase 3 efficacy study; we present a 2-year update.Methods: Children (20 099, 4-16 years old) were randomized to receive 2 doses of TAK-003 or placebo 3 months apart and are under surveillance to detect dengue by serotype-specific RT-PCR.Results: Cumulative efficacy against dengue approximately 27 months since first dose was 72.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67.1%-77.3%), including 67.0% (95% CI, 53.6%-76.5%) in dengue-naive and 89.2% (95% CI, 82.4%-93.3%) against hospitalized dengue. In the second year, decline in efficacy was observed (56.2%; 95% CI, 42.3%-66.8%) with the largest decline in 4-5 year olds (24.5%; 95% CI, -34.2% to 57.5%); efficacy was 60.6% (95% CI, 43.8%-72.4%) in 6-11 year and 71.2% (95% CI, 41.0%-85.9%) in 12-16 year age groups. As TAK-003 efficacy varies by serotype, changes in serotype dominance partially contributed to efficacy differences in year-by-year analysis. No related serious adverse events occurred during the second year.Conclusions: TAK-003 demonstrated continued benefit independent of baseline serostatus in reducing dengue with some decline in efficacy during the second year. Three-year data will be important to see if efficacy stabilizes or declines further.Clinical Trials Registration. NCT02747927.Takeda's tetravalent dengue vaccine (TAK-003) continued to demonstrate benefit in reducing dengue independent of baseline serostatus up to 2 years after completing vaccination with some decline in efficacy during the second year in 4-16 year olds in dengue-endemic countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Dengue is an increasing threat to global health. This exploratory analysis evaluated the immunogenicity, safety, and vaccine efficacy (VE) of a live-attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine (TAK-003) in participants enrolled in the phase 3 DEN-301 trial (NCT02747927), stratified by baseline age (4-5 years; 6-11 years; or 12-16 years)., Methods: Participants were randomized 2:1 to receive 2 doses of TAK-003, administered 3 months apart, or placebo. Dengue serostatus was evaluated at enrolment. VE against virologically-confirmed dengue (VCD) and hospitalized VCD; immunogenicity (geometric mean titers; GMTs); and safety were evaluated per age group through ∼4 years post-vaccination., Results: VE against VCD across serotypes was 43.5% (95% confidence interval: 25.3%, 57.3%) for 4-5 year-olds; 63.5% (56.9%, 69.1%) for 6-11 year-olds, and 67.7% (57.8%, 75.2%) for 12-16 year-olds. VE against hospitalized VCD was 63.8% (21.1%, 83.4%), 85.1% (77.1%, 90.3%), and 89.7% (77.9%, 95.2%), for the three age groups, respectively. GMTs remained elevated against all four serotypes for ∼4 years post-vaccination, with no evident differences across age groups. No clear differences in safety by age were identified., Conclusions: This exploratory analysis shows TAK-003 was efficacious in dengue prevention across age groups in children and adolescents 4-16 years of age living in dengue endemic areas. Relatively lower VE in 4-5 year-olds was potentially confounded by causative serotype distribution, small sample size, and VE by serotype, and should be considered in benefit-risk evaluations in this age group., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: We explored the impact of prior Yellow fever (YF) or Japanese encephalitis (JE) vaccination on the efficacy of Takeda's dengue vaccine candidate, TAK-003 (NCT02747927)., Methods: Children 4-16 years of age were randomized 2:1 to receive TAK-003 or placebo and were under active febrile surveillance. Symptomatic dengue was confirmed by serotype-specific RT-PCR. YF and JE vaccination history was recorded., Results: Of the 20,071 children who received TAK-003 or placebo, 21.1% had a YF and 23.9% had a JE vaccination history at randomization. Fifty-seven months after vaccination, vaccine efficacy was 55.7% (95% CI, 39.7%-67.5%) in those with YF vaccination, 77.8% (70.8%-83.1%) for JE vaccination, and 53.5% (45.4%-60.4%) for no prior YF/JE vaccination. Regional differences in serotype distribution confound these results. The apparent higher vaccine efficacy in the JE vaccination subgroup could be largely explained by serotype-specific efficacy of TAK-003. Within 28 days of any vaccination, the proportions of participants with serious adverse events in the YF/JE prior vaccination population were comparable between the TAK-003 and placebo groups., Conclusions: The available data do not suggest a clinically relevant impact of prior JE or YF vaccination on TAK-003 performance. Overall, TAK-003 was well-tolerated and efficacious in different epidemiological settings., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Solithromycin is a new macrolide-ketolide antibiotic with potential effectiveness in pediatric community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Our objective was to evaluate its safety and effectiveness in children with CABP., Methods: This phase 2/3, randomized, open-label, active-control, multicenter study randomly assigned solithromycin (capsules, suspension or intravenous) or an appropriate comparator antibiotic in a 3:1 ratio (planned n = 400) to children 2 months to 17 years of age with CABP. Primary safety endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and AE-related drug discontinuations. Secondary effectiveness endpoints included clinical improvement following treatment without additional antimicrobial therapy., Results: Unrelated to safety, the sponsor stopped the trial prior to completion. Before discontinuation, 97 participants were randomly assigned to solithromycin (n = 73) or comparator (n = 24). There were 24 participants (34%, 95% CI, 23%-47%) with a treatment-emergent AE in the solithromycin group and 7 (29%, 95% CI, 13%-51%) in the comparator group. Infusion site pain and elevated liver enzymes were the most common related AEs with solithromycin. Study drug was discontinued due to AEs in 3 subjects (4.3%) in the solithromycin group and 1 (4.2%) in the comparator group. Forty participants (65%, 95% CI, 51%-76%) in the solithromycin group achieved clinical improvement on the last day of treatment versus 17 (81%, 95% CI, 58%-95%) in the comparator group. The proportion achieving clinical cure was 60% (95% CI, 47%-72%) and 68% (95% CI, 43%-87%) for the solithromycin and comparator groups, respectively., Conclusions: Intravenous and oral solithromycin were generally well-tolerated and associated with clinical improvement in the majority of participants treated for CABP., Competing Interests: J.E.L. receives salary support for research from the nonprofit organization Thrasher Research Fund (www.thrasherresearch.org), the American Lung Association, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (HL145415), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; C.P.H. receives salary support for research from National Institute for Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) (1K23HD090239), the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (R61/R33HL147833), the US Food and Drug Administration (1R01-FD006099, PI Laughon; and 5U18-FD006298, PI: Benjamin), the U.S. government for his work in pediatric clinical pharmacology (Government Contract HHSN275201800003I, PI: Benjamin under the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act), the nonprofit Burrhoughs Wellcome Fund, and other sponsors for drug development in adults and children (https://dcri.org/about-us/conflict-of-interest/). M.C.-W. receives support for research from the National Institutes of Health (1R01-HD076676-01A1 and 1K24-AI143971), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (HHSN272201500006I and HHSN272201300017I), NICHD (HHSN275201000003I), Federal Drug Administration (5U18-FD006298), and industry for drug development in adults and children. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

This trial was conducted to assess the immunogenicity and safety of the varicella vaccine, Okavax, when administered concomitantly with the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, MMR-II, to children aged 12-24 months. A total of 299 children were randomized into three groups, those receiving Okavax only, MMR-II only, or both vaccines concomitantly. Antibody titers were determined by ELISA in blood samples taken immediately before, and 6 weeks after, vaccination. Parents recorded local and systemic reactions. Okavax elicited similar varicella seroconversion rates (> or = 93.9%) and high GMTs when given alone or with MMR-II (99.6 and 95.7 mIU/ml, respectively). The seroconversion rates (measles and rubella 100%, mumps > or = 75.0%) and high GMTs elicited by MMR-II were not affected by concomitant administration of Okavax. The incidence of adverse events was similar whether MMR-II and Okavax were administered concomitantly or separately, and the majority of local reactions were mild and transient, with fever the most frequent systemic event in all groups. In conclusion, these results show that the immune response and the reactogenicity profile of Okavax and MMR-II were similar when given together or alone. Concomitant administration of these vaccines can therefore be recommended for children in their second year of life.