Search

Your search keyword '"Boriaud O"' showing total 3 results
Start Over Author "Boriaud O"
3 results on '"Boriaud O"'

1. Assessing forest availability for wood supply in Europe

Author

European Commission, Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación (España), Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (España), Slovak Research and Development Agency, Alberdi, Iciar [0000-0003-1338-8465], Bender, Susann [0000-0002-3029-9475], Avitabile, V. [0000-0003-3646-052X], Boriaud, O. [0000-0002-8046-466X], Bosela, Michal [0000-0001-6706-8614], Cañellas, I. [0000-0002-9716-7776], Castro Rego, Francisco [0000-0003-0060-5192], Fischer, Christoph [0000-0002-7202-148X], Freudenschuss, A. [0000-0002-6080-2051], Fridman, Jonas [0000-0002-8295-665X], Gasparini, P. [0000-0001-8801-0980], Gschwantner, Thomas [0000-0001-9043-6884], Notarangelo, Monica [0000-0002-1968-8832], Nunes, Leónia [0000-0002-2617-0468], Rizzo, M. [0000-0003-2899-7319], Sebeň, Vladimír [0000-0003-3692-446X], Snorrason, A. [0000-0002-7184-6826], Tomter, Stein Michael [0000-0003-4683-2446], Hernández, Laura [0000-0002-1827-9623], Alberdi, Iciar, Bender, Susann, Riedel, Thomas, Avitabile, V., Boriaud, O., Bosela, Michal, Camia, Andrea, Cañellas, Isabel, Castro Rego, Francisco, Fischer, Christoph, Freudenschuss, A., Fridman, Jonas, Gasparini, P., Gschwantner, Thomas, Guerrero, Silvia, Kjartansson, B T., Kucera, Milos, Lanz, Adrian, Marin, Gheorghe, Mubareka, S., Notarangelo, Monica, Nunes, Leónia, Pesty, B., Pikula, T., Redmond, John, Rizzo, M., Sebeň, Vladimír, Snorrason, A., Tomter, Stein Michael, Hernández, Laura, European Commission, Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación (España), Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (España), Slovak Research and Development Agency, Alberdi, Iciar [0000-0003-1338-8465], Bender, Susann [0000-0002-3029-9475], Avitabile, V. [0000-0003-3646-052X], Boriaud, O. [0000-0002-8046-466X], Bosela, Michal [0000-0001-6706-8614], Cañellas, I. [0000-0002-9716-7776], Castro Rego, Francisco [0000-0003-0060-5192], Fischer, Christoph [0000-0002-7202-148X], Freudenschuss, A. [0000-0002-6080-2051], Fridman, Jonas [0000-0002-8295-665X], Gasparini, P. [0000-0001-8801-0980], Gschwantner, Thomas [0000-0001-9043-6884], Notarangelo, Monica [0000-0002-1968-8832], Nunes, Leónia [0000-0002-2617-0468], Rizzo, M. [0000-0003-2899-7319], Sebeň, Vladimír [0000-0003-3692-446X], Snorrason, A. [0000-0002-7184-6826], Tomter, Stein Michael [0000-0003-4683-2446], Hernández, Laura [0000-0002-1827-9623], Alberdi, Iciar, Bender, Susann, Riedel, Thomas, Avitabile, V., Boriaud, O., Bosela, Michal, Camia, Andrea, Cañellas, Isabel, Castro Rego, Francisco, Fischer, Christoph, Freudenschuss, A., Fridman, Jonas, Gasparini, P., Gschwantner, Thomas, Guerrero, Silvia, Kjartansson, B T., Kucera, Milos, Lanz, Adrian, Marin, Gheorghe, Mubareka, S., Notarangelo, Monica, Nunes, Leónia, Pesty, B., Pikula, T., Redmond, John, Rizzo, M., Sebeň, Vladimír, Snorrason, A., Tomter, Stein Michael, and Hernández, Laura

Abstract

The quantification of forests available for wood supply (FAWS) is essential for decision-making with regard to the maintenance and enhancement of forest resources and their contribution to the global carbon cycle. The provision of harmonized forest statistics is necessary for the development of forest associated policies and to support decision-making. Based on the National Forest Inventory (NFI) data from 13 European countries, we quantify and compare the areas and aboveground dry biomass (AGB) of FAWS and forest not available for wood supply (FNAWS) according to national and reference definitions by determining the restrictions and associated thresholds considered at country level to classify forests as FAWS or FNAWS. FAWS represent between 75 and 95 % of forest area and AGB for most of the countries in this study. Economic restrictions are the main factor limiting the availability of forests for wood supply, accounting for 67 % of the total FNAWS area and 56 % of the total FNAWS AGB, followed by environmental restrictions. Profitability, slope and accessibility as economic restrictions, and protected areas as environmental restrictions are the factors most frequently considered to distinguish between FAWS and FNAWS. With respect to the area of FNAWS associated with each type of restriction, an overlap among the restrictions of 13.7 % was identified. For most countries, the differences in the FNAWS areas and AGB estimates between national and reference definitions ranged from 0 to 5 %. These results highlight the applicability and reliability of a FAWS reference definition for most of the European countries studied, thereby facilitating a consistent approach to assess forests available for supply for the purpose of international reporting.

Published
2020

2. Assessing forest availability for wood supply in Europe

Author

Alberdi, I., primary, Bender, S., additional, Riedel, T., additional, Avitable, V., additional, Boriaud, O., additional, Bosela, M., additional, Camia, A., additional, Cañellas, I., additional, Castro Rego, F., additional, Fischer, C., additional, Freudenschuß, A., additional, Fridman, J., additional, Gasparini, P., additional, Gschwantner, T., additional, Guerrero, S., additional, Kjartansson, B.T., additional, Kucera, M., additional, Lanz, A., additional, Marin, G., additional, Mubareka, S., additional, Notarangelo, M., additional, Nunes, L., additional, Pesty, B., additional, Pikula, T., additional, Redmond, J., additional, Rizzo, M., additional, Seben, V., additional, Snorrason, A., additional, Tomter, S., additional, and Hernández, L., additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Assessing forest availability for wood supply in Europe

Author

V. Seben, Jonas Fridman, Stein Tomter, Alexandra Freudenschuß, O. Boriaud, Michal Bosela, B. Pesty, Andrea Camia, B.T. Kjartansson, Monica Notarangelo, Laura Hernández, V. Avitable, Thomas Gschwantner, Thomas Riedel, Milos Kucera, Arnór Snorrason, Adrian Lanz, Leónia Nunes, S. Mubareka, T. Pikula, Silvia Guerrero, Isabel Cañellas, Maria Rizzo, Christoph Fischer, F. Castro Rego, Patrizia Gasparini, Gheorghe Marin, Susann Bender, John Redmond, Iciar Alberdi, European Commission, Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación (España), Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (España), Slovak Research and Development Agency, Alberdi, Iciar, Bender, Susann, Avitabile, V., Boriaud, O., Bosela, Michal, Cañellas, I., Castro Rego, Francisco, Fischer, Christoph, Freudenschuss, A., Fridman, Jonas, Gasparini, P., Gschwantner, Thomas, Notarangelo, Monica, Nunes, Leónia, Rizzo, M., Sebeň, Vladimír, Snorrason, A., Tomter, Stein Michael, and Hernández, Laura

Subjects
Economics and Econometrics, Wood resources, Sociology and Political Science, National forest inventory, 0211 other engineering and technologies, restriction, Harmonization, 02 engineering and technology, 010501 environmental sciences, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 01 natural sciences, Article, FAWS, Country level, Restriction, Biomass, national forest inventory, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences, Biomass (ecology), biomass, Agroforestry, wood resources, 021107 urban & regional planning, Forestry, Limiting, Forest resource, Geography, harmonization, Profitability index
Abstract

14 Pág., The quantification of forests available for wood supply (FAWS) is essential for decision-making with regard to the maintenance and enhancement of forest resources and their contribution to the global carbon cycle. The provision of harmonized forest statistics is necessary for the development of forest associated policies and to support decision-making. Based on the National Forest Inventory (NFI) data from 13 European countries, we quantify and compare the areas and aboveground dry biomass (AGB) of FAWS and forest not available for wood supply (FNAWS) according to national and reference definitions by determining the restrictions and associated thresholds considered at country level to classify forests as FAWS or FNAWS. FAWS represent between 75 and 95 % of forest area and AGB for most of the countries in this study. Economic restrictions are the main factor limiting the availability of forests for wood supply, accounting for 67 % of the total FNAWS area and 56 % of the total FNAWS AGB, followed by environmental restrictions. Profitability, slope and accessibility as economic restrictions, and protected areas as environmental restrictions are the factors most frequently considered to distinguish between FAWS and FNAWS. With respect to the area of FNAWS associated with each type of restriction, an overlap among the restrictions of 13.7 % was identified. For most countries, the differences in the FNAWS areas and AGB estimates between national and reference definitions ranged from 0 to 5 %. These results highlight the applicability and reliability of a FAWS reference definition for most of the European countries studied, thereby facilitating a consistent approach to assess forests available for supply for the purpose of international reporting., This research was supported by the Specific contract n. 18 “Use of National Forest Inventories data to estimate area and above ground biomass in European forests not available for wood supply” in the context of the Framework contract for the provision of forest data and services supporting the European Forest Data Centre 2012/ S 78-127532 of 21/04/2012 of the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission; the EG-013-72 agreement of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAPA) and the INIA belonging to the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN); and the project No.APVV-15-0265 granted by the Slovak Research and Development Agency.

Published
2020

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results