Background: The Minimum Information for Studies Evaluating Biologics in Orthopedics (MIBO) guidelines were developed in May 2017 to encourage improved reporting standards, promote increased transparency and reproducibility, and enhance clinical evaluation capabilities. The MIBO guidelines consist of 23 checklist items considered necessary to critically appraise clinical studies evaluating platelet-rich plasma (PRP)., Purpose: To assess randomized controlled trials that evaluated PRP for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in order to systematically review their adherence to the MIBO guidelines., Study Design: Systematic review. Level 1a., Methods: A search was performed following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials reporting on knee osteoarthritis treated with intra-articular PRP. The studies were categorized into pre-, peri-, and post-MIBO groups based on the start date of data collection. The overall MIBO scores, defined as percentage of checklist items out of the 23 checklist items reported in 1 study, individual item scores, defined as percentage of studies reporting the checklist item within a specified group, and overall item score defined as the average of the individual item scores from all the included studies were calculated., Results: The review included 87 studies (7925 patients; 8118 knees). Of these, 51 studies were assigned to the pre-MIBO group, 19 studies to the peri-MIBO group, and 17 studies to the post-MIBO group. The overall MIBO score was 72%. No statistically significant differences in MIBO scores were found among the 3 MIBO groups ( P = .345). The majority of the studies (62 studies; 71%) had MIBO scores <80%. MIBO items with particularly low item scores included reporting of whole-blood characteristics (20%), platelet recovery rate (22%), PRP analysis (30%), and PRP activation (47%). No significant difference among the 3 MIBO groups was found for the item scores except for the reporting of the recipient details ( P = .012)., Conclusion: This study highlights the deficiencies in adherence to the MIBO guidelines, particularly in reporting key variables such as whole-blood characteristics, platelet recovery rate, PRP analysis, and PRP activation. These findings suggest that the publication of the MIBO guidelines has not resulted in improved reporting practices in studies investigating intra-articular PRP for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis., Competing Interests: One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: K.M. is on the medical advisory board for Tendanova and is a consultant for Lipogems. A.D. has received support for education from Arthrex and hospitality payments from Zimmer Biomet Holdings and Pacira Pharmaceuticals. S.S. has received consulting fees from Linvatec, Vericel, Bioventus, Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Biorez, Kinamed, DJO, DePuy Synthes, Medical Device Business Services, Smith + Nephew, Joint Restoration Foundation, Flexion Therapeutics, and Olympus America; royalties from Linvatec; honoraria from Vericel, Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Joint Restoration Foundation, and Flexion Therapeutics; speaking fees from Arthrex and Synthes GmbH; support for education from Evolution Surgical; and hospitality payments from Aesculap Biologics. W.I.S. has received consulting fees from Tenex Health. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.