Search

Introduction/Aims: Point‐of‐care ultrasound of the diaphragm is highly sensitive and specific in the detection of neuromuscular diaphragmatic dysfunction. In some patients with neuromuscular diaphragmatic dysfunction, paradoxical thinning of the diaphragm during inspiration is observed on ultrasound; however, its frequency, electrodiagnostic associations, and prognostic significance remain uncertain. Methods: Medical records of patients presenting to two electrodiagnostic laboratories (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota and University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta) from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022, for evaluation of suspected neuromuscular respiratory failure, were reviewed. Results: 214 patients were referred and 19 patients excluded due to incomplete information. Of 195 patients (384 hemidiaphragms), 104 had phrenic neuropathy, 12 had myopathy, and 79 had no evidence of neuromuscular disease affecting the diaphragm. Paradoxical thinning occurred in 31 (27%) patients with neuromuscular diaphragmatic dysfunction and was unilateral in 30, the majority (83%) having normal contralateral ultrasound. Phrenic nerve conduction studies and diaphragm electromyography results did not distinguish patients with paradoxical thinning versus without. Most patients (71%) with paradoxical thinning required non‐invasive ventilation (NIV), including 16 with unilateral paradoxical thinning. Paradoxical thinning and BMI ≥30 kg/m2 were risk factors for requiring NIV in multivariable logistic regression analysis, with odds ratios of 2.887 (95% CI:1.166, 7.151) and 2.561 (95% CI: 1.186, 5.532), respectively. Discussion: Paradoxical thinning of the diaphragm occurs in patients with prominent neuromuscular diaphragmatic dysfunction, most commonly from phrenic neuropathy, and is a significant risk factor for requiring NIV. Unilateral paradoxical thinning is sufficient for needing NIV. BMI ≥30 kg/m2 additionally increases risk of requiring NIV in patients with neuromuscular diaphragmatic dysfunction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Phrenic nerve conduction studies (NCSs) and needle electromyography (EMG) can provide important information on the underlying pathophysiology in patients presenting with unexplained shortness of breath, failure to wean from the ventilator, or consideration of phrenic nerve pacemaker implantation. However, these techniques are often technically challenging, require experience, can lack sensitivity and specificity, and, in the case of diaphragm EMG, involve some degree of risk. Diagnostic high‐resolution ultrasound has been introduced in recent years as an adjuvant technique readily available at the bedside that can increase the overall sensitivity and specificity of the neurophysiologic evaluation of respiratory symptoms. Two‐dimensional ultrasound in the zone of apposition can identify atrophy and evaluate contractility of the diaphragm, in addition to localizing a safe zone for needle EMG. M‐mode ultrasound can identify decreased excursion or paradoxical motion of the diaphragm and can increase the reliability of phrenic NCSs. When used in combination, ultrasound, phrenic NCSs and EMG of the diaphragm can differentiate neuropathic, myopathic, and central disorders, and can offer aid in prognosis that is difficult to arrive at solely from clinical examination. This article will review techniques to successfully perform phrenic NCSs, needle EMG of the diaphragm, and ultrasound of the diaphragm. The discussion will include technical pitfalls and clinical pearls as well as future directions and clinical indications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neuromuscular ultrasound has become an integral part of the diagnostic workup of neuromuscular disorders at many centers. Despite its growing utility, uniform standard scanning techniques do not currently exist. Scanning approaches for similar diseases vary in the literature creating heterogeneity in the studies as reported in several meta‐analysis. Moreover, neuromuscular ultrasound experts including the group in this study have different views with regards to technical aspects, scanning protocols, and the parameters that should be assessed. Establishing standardized neuromuscular scanning protocols is essential for the development of the subspeciality to ensure uniform clinical and research practices. Therefore, we aimed to recommend consensus‐based standardized scanning techniques and protocols for common neuromuscular disorders using the Delphi approach. A panel of 17 experts participated in the study, which consisted of three consecutive electronic surveys. The first survey included voting on six scanning protocols addressing the general scanning technique and five common categories of suspected neuromuscular disorders. The subsequent surveys focused on refining the protocols and voting on new steps, rephrased statements, or areas of non‐agreement. A high degree of consensus was achieved on the general neuromuscular ultrasound scanning technique and the scanning protocols for focal mononeuropathies, brachial plexopathies, polyneuropathies, amyotophic lateral sclerosis, and muscle diseases. In this study, a group of neuromuscular ultrasound experts developed six consensus‐based neuromuscular ultrasound scanning protocols that may serve as references for clinicians and researchers. The standardized protocols could also aid in achieving high‐quality uniform neuromuscular ultrasound practices. See Editorial on pages 341–344 in this issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neuralgic amyotrophy (NA), also referred to as idiopathic brachial plexitis and Parsonage‐Turner syndrome, is a peripheral nerve disorder characterized by acute severe shoulder pain followed by progressive upper limb weakness and muscle atrophy. While NA is incompletely understood and often difficult to diagnose, early recognition may prevent unnecessary tests and interventions and, in some situations, allow for prompt treatment, which can potentially minimize adverse long‐term sequalae. High‐resolution ultrasound (HRUS) has become a valuable tool in the diagnosis and evaluation of NA. Pathologic HRUS findings can be grouped into four categories: nerve swelling, swelling with incomplete constriction, swelling with complete constriction, and fascicular entwinement, which may represent a continuum of pathologic processes. Certain ultrasound findings may help predict the likelihood of spontaneous recovery with conservative management versus the need for surgical intervention. We recommend relying heavily on history and physical examination to determine which nerves are clinically affected and should therefore be assessed by HRUS. The nerves most frequently affected by NA are the suprascapular, long thoracic, median and anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) branch, radial and posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) branch, axillary, spinal accessory, and musculocutaneous. When distal upper limb nerves are affected (AIN, PIN, superficial radial nerve), the lesion is almost always located in their respective fascicles within the parent nerve, proximal to its branching point. The purpose of this review is to describe a reproducible, standardized, ultrasonographic approach for evaluating suspected NA, and to share reliable techniques and clinical considerations when imaging commonly affected nerves. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]