Search

Background Extended sedentary behavior is a risk factor for chronic disease and mortality, even among those who exercise regularly. Given the time constraints of incorporating physical activity into daily schedules, and the high likelihood of sitting during office work, this environment may serve as a potentially feasible setting for interventions to reduce sedentary behavior. Methods and Results A randomized cross‐over clinical trial was conducted at an employee wellness center. Four office settings were evaluated on 4 consecutive days: stationary or sitting station on day 1 (referent), and 3 subsequent active workstations (standing, walking, or stepper) in randomized order. Neurocognitive function (Selective Attention, Grammatical Reasoning, Odd One Out, Object Reasoning, Visuospatial Intelligence, Limited‐Hold Memory, Paired Associates Learning, and Digit Span) and fine motor skills (typing speed and accuracy) were tested using validated tools. Average scores were compared among stations using linear regression with generalized estimating equations to adjust standard errors. Bonferroni method adjusted for multiple comparisons. Healthy subjects were enrolled (n=44), 28 (64%) women, mean±SD age 35±11 years, weight 75.5±17.1 kg, height 168.5±10.0 cm, and body mass index 26.5±5.2 kg/m2. When comparing active stations to sitting, neurocognitive test either improved or remained unchanged, while typing speed decreased without affecting typing errors. Overall results improved after day 1, suggesting habituation. We observed no major differences across active stations, except decrease in average typing speed 42.5 versus 39.7 words per minute with standing versus stepping (P=0.003). Conclusions Active workstations improved cognitive performance, suggesting that these workstations can help decrease sedentary time without work performance impairment. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT06240286.

Objective: To determine whether the number of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) sessions attended and selected clinical characteristics were predictive of patients who exhibited improvement in peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) after CR. Patients and Methods: Using the Rochester Epidemiology Project records-linkage system, we identified all consecutive patients aged 18 years or older from Olmsted County, Minnesota, who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing before and after CR from 1999 to 2017. Regression models were created to assess the clinical predictors of VO2peak improvement (>0% baseline) after CR. Results: The analysis included 671 patients, of which 524 (78%) patients exhibited VO2peak improvement after CR. The significant univariate predictors of VO2peak improvement included younger age (odds ratio [OR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99), lower pre-CR VO2peak (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99), and no history of peripheral artery disease (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31-0.81) (all, P

Background: To identify factors that increase the specificity of the treadmill exercise test (TMET), and develop a novel scoring system which accounts for functional capacity to aid in determining the need for further testing. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the electronic health records of 600 patients who had positive TMET results and follow-up stress echocardiography from 1-January-2004, through 31-December-2016. Correlations between clinical and aerobic variables and multivessel disease (MVD) were determined. Duke Treadmill Score (DTS) was calculated and compared with a novel scoring system titled the Intermediate-High-Workload Treadmill Score (IHWTS) that used variables associated with MVD. Results: In total, 124 of 600 patients (21%) had coronary catheterization, and 51 of these patients (41%) had MVD. Mean (SD) DTS was –2.10 (6.3) among patients with MVD vs –0.16 (5) among patients without MVD (p = 0.06). Mean (SD) functional aerobic capacity (FAC) was 76% (20%) among patients with MVD vs 90% (21%) among patients without MVD (p < 0.001). Mean (SD) metabolic equivalent (MET) was 7 (2) among patients with MVD vs 8 (2) among patients without MVD (p = 0.002). Only 6 (12%) of patients with MVD achieved 9 MET or greater on TMET. DTS less than 4 did not distinguish between patients with and without MVD (p = 0.67). Age, hypertension and FAC were independently associated with MVD (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our novel scoring system IHWTS utilized age, hypertension, and FAC appeared comparable to DTS to risk-stratify patients regardless of baseline symptoms. Clinical parameters such as hypertension along with exercise functional capacity should be considered when evaluating a positive TMET result in patients that achieve an intermediate-high workload >5 Metabolic Equivalents (METs).

ObjectiveWe investigated age-related differences for peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2) improvement with exercise training during cardiac rehabilitation (CR).Patients and MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of the Mayo Clinic Rochester CR program including adult patients who attended CR (≥1 session) for any eligible indication between 1999 and 2017 and who had a cardiopulmonary exercise test pre and post CR with VO2 data (peak respiratory exchange ratio ≥1.0). Younger (20–49 yrs), midlife (50–64 yrs), and older adults (≥65 yrs) were compared using ANOVA for delta and percent change in peak VO2; and percentage of peak VO2 responders (>0% change).Results708 patients (age: 60.8 ± 12.1 years; 24% female) met inclusion criteria. Delta and percent change in peak VO2 was lower for older adults (1.6 ± 3.2 mL.kg.min−1; 12 ± 27%) compared with younger (3.7 ± 4.0 mL.kg.min−1, p < 0.001; 23 ± 28%, p = 0.002) and midlife adults (2.8 ± 3.8 mL.kg.min−1, p < 0.001; 17 ± 28%, p = 0.04). For midlife, delta change, but not percent change in peak VO2 was significantly lower (p = 0.02) compared with younger. Percentage of responders was only different between older and younger (72 vs. 86%; p = 0.008). Sensitivity analyses in non-surgical patients showed similar differences for delta change, and differences in percent change remained significant between older and younger adults (10 ± 20% vs. 16 ± 18%; p = 0.04).ConclusionsIn CR patients, older adults had lower improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness than younger and midlife adults. While excluding surgical patients reduced age-related differences, older adults still had lower cardiorespiratory fitness improvement during CR. These findings may have implications for individualizing CR programming in aging populations to reduce future cardiovascular risk.

Exercise based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recognized internationally as a class 1 clinical practice recommendation for patients with select cardiovascular diseases and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Over the past decade, several meta-analyses have generated debate regarding the effectiveness of exercise-based CR for reducing all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. A common theme highlighted in these meta-analyses is the heterogeneity and/or lack of detail regarding exercise prescription methodology within CR programs. Currently there is no international consensus on exercise prescription for CR, and exercise intensity recommendations vary considerably between countries from light-moderate intensity to moderate intensity to moderate-vigorous intensity. As cardiorespiratory fitness [peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak)] is a strong predictor of mortality in patients with coronary heart disease and heart failure, exercise prescription that optimizes improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness and exercise capacity is a critical consideration for the efficacy of CR programming. This review will examine the evidence for prescribing higher-intensity aerobic exercise in CR, including the role of high-intensity interval training. This discussion will highlight the beneficial physiological adaptations to pulmonary, cardiac, vascular, and skeletal muscle systems associated with moderate-vigorous exercise training in patients with coronary heart disease and heart failure. Moreover, this review will propose how varying interval exercise protocols (such as short-duration or long-duration interval training) and exercise progression models may influence central and peripheral physiological adaptations. Importantly, a key focus of this review is to provide clinically-relevant recommendations and strategies to optimize prescription of exercise intensity while maximizing safety in patients attending CR programs.

Objective: The objective of the study was to assess the physical activity (PA) and exercise patterns among participants in a large multinational spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) registry. Patients and Methods: Participants with SCAD enrolled from March 2011 to November 2019 completed surveys including details regarding PA and exercise habits prior to SCAD, and PA counseling received from their provider after SCAD. Demographics and clinical characteristics were collected by electronic record review. Exercise prescribed to patients after SCAD was categorized according to exercise components: type, intensity, frequency, time/session, and extreme environmental conditions.Results: We included 950 participants; mean ± age was 46.8 ± 9.5 years old at the time of first SCAD; most (96.3%) were women and (77.0%) attended ≥1 cardiac rehabilitation session. Hyperlipidemia (34.3%), hypertension (32.8%), and elevated body weight (overweight = 27.0%; obesity = 20.0%) were the most common comorbidities. Prior to SCAD, 48.5% performed aerobic exercise ≥3 times/week, and only 32.0% performed strength-building exercise regularly. PA counseling details after SCAD in 299/950 participants showed that most (93.3%) patients received some form of counseling including exercise prescription (EXP), non-specific recommendations, and discouraged from any exercise. Limits regarding exercise type and intensity were the most common advice among participants who received EXP.Conclusion: Insights from our study suggest that only 48% of the patients performed some aerobic exercise three or more times per week, and 32.0% performed strength-building exercises, which suggest that most of them may not be as active as assumed. Furthermore, 70% of the SCAD patients have ≥1 cardiovascular risk factors. We suggest guiding patients based on individual assessment, taking into consideration baseline PA habits, treatment, and risk factors. SCAD-tailored PA guidelines are needed for optimal EXP without compromising patient safety.

Abstract Background To examine the effect of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on metabolic syndrome (MetS) and body composition in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) patients with myocardial infarction (MI). Methods We retrospectively screened 174 consecutive patients with MetS enrolled in CR following MI between 2015 and 2018. We included 56 patients who completed 36 CR sessions and pre-post dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Of these patients, 42 engaged in HIIT and 14 in moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). HIIT included 4–8 intervals of high-intensity (30–60 s at RPE 15–17 [Borg 6–20]) and low-intensity (1–5 min at RPE

Background Right bundle‐branch block (RBBB) occurs in 0.2% to 1.3% of people and is considered a benign finding. However, some studies have suggested increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We sought to evaluate risk attributable to incidental RBBB in patients without prior diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods and Results We reviewed the Mayo Clinic Integrated Stress Center database for exercise stress tests performed from 1993 to 2010. Patients with no known CVD—defined as absence of coronary disease, structural heart disease, heart failure, or cerebrovascular disease—were selected. Only Minnesota residents were included, all of whom had full mortality and outcomes data. There were 22 806 patients without CVD identified; 220 of whom (0.96%) had RBBB, followed for 6 to 23 years (mean 12.4±5.1). There were 8256 women (36.2%), mean age was 52±11 years; and 1837 deaths (8.05%), including 645 cardiovascular‐related deaths (2.83%), occurred over follow‐up. RBBB was predictive of all‐cause (hazard ratio [HR], 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1–2.0; P=0.0058) and cardiovascular‐related mortality (HR,1.7; 95% CI, 1.1–2.8; P=0.0178) after adjusting for age, sex, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity, current and past history of smoking, and use of a heart rate‐lowering drug. Patients with RBBB exhibited more hypertension (34.1% versus 23.7%, P