Search

Background: Social distancing measures designed to contain the COVID-19 pandemic can restrict physical activity, a particular concern for high-risk patient groups. We assessed rheumatoid arthritis patients' physical activity and sedentary behavior level, pain, fatigue, and health-related quality of life prior to and during the social distancing measures implemented in Sao Paulo, Brazil., Methods: Post-menopausal females diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis were assessed before (from March 2018 to March 2020) and during (from 24 May to 7 July 2020) social distancing measures to contain COVID-19 pandemic, using a within-subjects, repeated-measure design. Physical activity and sedentary behavior were assessed using accelerometry (ActivPAL micro). Pain, fatigue, and health-related quality of life were assessed by questionnaires., Results: Mean age was 60.9 years and BMI was 29.5 Kg/m 2 . Disease activity ranged from remission to moderate activity. During social distancing, there were reductions in light-intensity activity (13.0% [-0.2 h/day, 95% CI: -0.4 to -0.04; p = 0.016]) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (38.8% [-4.5 min/day, 95% CI: -8.1 to -0.9; p = 0.015]), but not in standing time and sedentary time. However, time spent in prolonged bouts of sitting ≥30 min increased by 34% (1.0 h/day, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.7; p = 0.006) and ≥60 min increased by 85% (1.0 h/day, 95% CI: 0.5 to 1.6). There were no changes in pain, fatigue, and health-related quality of life (all p > 0.050)., Conclusions: Imposed social distancing measures to contain the COVID-19 outbreak were associated with decreased physical activity and increased prolonged sedentary behavior, but did not change clinical symptoms sitting among patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Objectives: To investigate the inter/intra-reliability of ultrasound (US) muscle echogenicity in patients with rheumatic diseases., Methods: Forty-two rheumatologists and 2 radiologists from 13 countries were asked to assess US muscle echogenicity of quadriceps muscle in 80 static images and 20 clips from 64 patients with different rheumatic diseases and 8 healthy subjects. Two visual scales were evaluated, a visual semi-quantitative scale (0-3) and a continuous quantitative measurement ("VAS echogenicity," 0-100). The same assessment was repeated to calculate intra-observer reliability. US muscle echogenicity was also calculated by an independent research assistant using a software for the analysis of scientific images (ImageJ). Inter and intra reliabilities were assessed by means of prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted Kappa (PABAK), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and correlations through Kendall's Tau and Pearson's Rho coefficients., Results: The semi-quantitative scale showed a moderate inter-reliability [PABAK = 0.58 (0.57-0.59)] and a substantial intra-reliability [PABAK = 0.71 (0.68-0.73)]. The lowest inter and intra-reliability results were obtained for the intermediate grades (i.e., grade 1 and 2) of the semi-quantitative scale. "VAS echogenicity" showed a high reliability both in the inter-observer [ICC = 0.80 (0.75-0.85)] and intra-observer [ICC = 0.88 (0.88-0.89)] evaluations. A substantial association was found between the participants assessment of the semi-quantitative scale and "VAS echogenicity" [ICC = 0.52 (0.50-0.54)]. The correlation between these two visual scales and ImageJ analysis was high (tau = 0.76 and rho = 0.89, respectively)., Conclusion: The results of this large, multicenter study highlighted the overall good inter and intra-reliability of the US assessment of muscle echogenicity in patients with different rheumatic diseases., Competing Interests: SA received honoraria from AbbVie, Celgene, UCB, Novartis, Janssen, Pfizer, and Sanofi. AB served as a speaker for AbbVie, Amgen, Sanofi-Genzyme, and UCB, outside the submitted work. EF had received speaking fees from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, and UCB, outside the submitted work. WG had received speaking fees from Celltrion and Pfizer, outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2023 Di Matteo, Moscioni, Lommano, Cipolletta, Smerilli, Farah, Airoldi, Aydin, Becciolini, Bonfiglioli, Carotti, Carrara, Cazenave, Corradini, Cosatti, de Agustin, Destro Castaniti, Di Carlo, Di Donato, Di Geso, Elliott, Fodor, Francioso, Gabba, Hernández-Díaz, Horvath, Hurnakova, Jesus, Marin, Martire, Mashadi Mirza, Massarotti, Musca, Nair, Okano, Papalopoulos, Rosa, Rosemffet, Rovisco, Rozza, Salaffi, Scioscia, Scirè, Tamas, Tanimura, Ventura-Rios, Villota-Eraso, Villota, Voulgari, Vreju, Vukatana, Hereter, Zanetti, Grassi and Filippucci.)

Objectives: To investigate the reliability of the OMERACT US Task Force definition of US enthesitis in SpA., Methods: In this web exercise, based on the evaluation of 101 images and 39 clips of the main entheses of the lower limbs, the elementary components included in the OMERACT definition of US enthesitis in SpA (hypoechoic areas, entheseal thickening, power Doppler signal at the enthesis, enthesophytes/calcifications, bone erosions) were assessed by 47 rheumatologists from 37 rheumatology centres in 15 countries. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the US components of enthesitis was calculated using Light's kappa, Cohen's kappa, Prevalence And Bias Adjusted Kappa (PABAK) and their 95% CIs., Results: Bone erosions and power Doppler signal at the enthesis showed the highest overall inter-reliability [Light's kappa: 0.77 (0.76-0.78), 0.72 (0.71-0.73), respectively; PABAK: 0.86 (0.86-0.87), 0.73 (0.73-0.74), respectively], followed by enthesophytes/calcifications [Light's kappa: 0.65 (0.64-0.65), PABAK: 0.67 (0.67-0.68)]. This was moderate for entheseal thickening [Light's kappa: 0.41 (0.41-0.42), PABAK: 0.41 (0.40-0.42)], and fair for hypoechoic areas [Light's kappa: 0.37 (0.36-0.38); PABAK: 0.37 (0.37-0.38)]. A similar trend was observed in the intra-reliability exercise, although this was characterized by an overall higher degree of reliability for all US elementary components compared with the inter-observer evaluation., Conclusions: The results of this multicentre, international, web-based study show a good reliability of the OMERACT US definition of bone erosions, power Doppler signal at the enthesis and enthesophytes/calcifications. The low reliability of entheseal thickening and hypoechoic areas raises questions about the opportunity to revise the definition of these two major components for the US diagnosis of enthesitis., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) composite disease activity indices have become handy tools in daily clinical practice and crucial in defining remission or low disease activity, the main target of the RA treatment. However, there is no definition of the best index to assess disease activity in clinical practice., Objectives: To compare the residual activity among the indices with the ACR/EULAR remission criteria (Boolean method) to identify the most feasible for assessing remission in daily practice, also considering correlation and concordance, sensibility, and specificity., Patients and Methods: We selected 1116 patients with established RA from the real-life rheumatoid arthritis study database-REAL. The composite disease activity indices-DAS28-ESR, DAS28-CRP, SDAI, and CDAI-and their components were compared to the Boolean method to identify residual activity using binomial regression. The indices were analyzed for correlation and agreement using the Spearman index and weighted kappa. The chi-square test evaluated sensibility and specificity for remission based on the Boolean method., Results: DAS28-CRP overestimated remission and confirmed higher residual activity than SDAI and CDAI. The indices showed good correlation and agreement, with a better relationship between SDAI and CDAI (k:0,88). CDAI and SDAI showed higher sensitivity and specificity for remission based on the Boolean method. CDAI was performed in 99% of patients, while DAS28 and SDAI were completed in approximately 85%., Conclusions: Although all composite indices of activity can be used in clinical practice and showed good agreement, CDAI and SDAI have better performance in evaluating remission based on the Boolean method, showing less residual activity and higher sensibility and specificity. In addition, CDAI seems to be more feasible for disease activity evaluation in daily clinical practice, especially in developing countries., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background/objective: Although telemedicine use has been under discussion for decades, this topic has gained unprecedented importance during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (RADAI) is a user-friendly tool, fully self-administered, to assess rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of RADAI with other disease activity indices, functional status, and inflammatory markers in a large cohort of RA patients., Methods: We assessed the concurrent validity of RADAI against Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints-C-reactive protein, Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints-erythrocyte sedimentation rate, Simplified Disease Activity Index, and physician assessment of disease activity and the correlation of RADAI with Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index and inflammatory markers at the REAL Study baseline. We also evaluated the correlation of the change in RADAI and the change in CDAI over a 6-month follow-up., Results: From the 1115 patients included in the REAL Study, 1113 had RADAI scores in the first assessment. At baseline, correlations between RADAI and other disease activity indices were strong, ranging from 0.64 (comparison with physician assessment) to 0.79 (comparison with CDAI). Correlation between the change in RADAI score over the 6 months of follow-up and the change in CDAI score over the same period was moderate/strong for the overall group and within the stratified analyses., Conclusion: The strong correlation of RADAI with other well-established tools for disease activity measurement reassures its use with RA patients' follow-up, especially in this new era of telemedicine., Competing Interests: A.B.V.-S. has received personal fees and/or nonfinancial support from Abbvie, Janssen, and Novartis. E.S.F.C. has received speaking fees from Abbvie and is partially supported by the National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq in the Portuguese acronym, grant number 307045/2016-1). L.M.H.M. has received personal or institutional support from Abbvie, Janssen, Pfizer, and Roche, has delivered speeches at events related to this work, and was sponsored by AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Janssen, Libbs, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, and UCB. M.F.B.R.G. has received personal fees and/or nonfinancial support from Abbvie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB. K.R.B. has received personal fees and/or nonfinancial support from Abbvie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Novartis, and Roche. N.C.S. has received personal fees and/or nonfinancial support from Janssen. S.C.R. has received consulting fees, speaking fees, and institutional supporting for clinical trials from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Pfizer, and Roche. I.A.P. has received personal fees and/or nonfinancial support from Abbvie, Janssen, Novartis, Roche, and UCB. C.V.B. has received personal fees and/or nonfinancial support from Abbvie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB. The other authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate premenopausal women with longstanding rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for potential associations between parameters of localized bone involvement and parameters of systemic bone involvement in the affected joints., Methods: Eighty consecutively evaluated premenopausal women with RA were included in the study, along with 160 healthy female control subjects who were matched to the patients by age and body mass index. Volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), bone microarchitecture, and finite elements of biomechanical bone strength (bone stiffness and estimated failure load) at the distal radius and distal tibia were analyzed by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in patients with RA compared to healthy controls. In addition, in patients with RA, localized bone involvement in the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints was analyzed by HR-pQCT, to identify bone erosions and osteophytes., Results: Among the 80 premenopausal women with longstanding RA, the mean ± SD age was 39.4 ± 6.7 years and mean ± SD disease duration was 9.8 ± 5.3 years. Trabecular and cortical bone parameters and bone strength at the distal radius and distal tibia were all impaired in patients with RA compared to healthy controls (each P < 0.05). In total, 75% of RA patients had evidence of bone erosions, and 41.3% of RA patients had detectable osteophytes on HR-pQCT. RA patients with bone erosions, as compared to RA patients without bone erosions, had lower cortical vBMD (at the distal radius, mean ± SD 980 ± 72 mg HA/cm 3 versus 1,021 ± 47 mg HA/cm 3 [P = 0.03]; at the distal tibia, 979 ± 47 mg HA/cm 3 versus 1,003 ± 34 mg HA/cm 3 [P = 0.04]) and higher cortical bone porosity (at the distal radius, mean ± SD 2.8 ± 2.5% versus 1.8 ± 1.6% [P = 0.04]; at the distal tibia, 3.7 ± 1.6% versus 2.7 ± 1.6% [P = 0.01]). In patients with RA, osteophyte volume at the distal radius was positively correlated with trabecular vBMD (r = 0.392, P = 0.02), trabecular number (r = 0.381, P = 0.03), and trabecular stiffness (r = 0.411, P = 0.02), and negatively correlated with trabecular separation (r = -0.364, P = 0.04), as determined by Pearson's or Spearman's correlation test., Conclusion: The findings show that premenopausal women with longstanding RA have systemic bone fragility at peripheral joint sites. Moreover, the presence of bone erosions is mainly associated with cortical bone fragility at the distal radius and tibia, and presence of osteophytes is associated with repair of trabecular bone at the distal radius., (© 2021 American College of Rheumatology.)

Question Addressed by the Study: Methotrexate (MTX) is a key anchor drug for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management. Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common complication of RA. Whether MTX exposure increases the risk of ILD in patients with RA is disputed. We aimed to evaluate the association of prior MTX use with development of RA-ILD., Methods: Through a case-control study design with discovery and international replication samples, we examined the association of MTX exposure with ILD in 410 patients with chronic fibrotic ILD associated with RA (RA-ILD) and 673 patients with RA without ILD. Estimates were pooled over the different samples using meta-analysis techniques., Results: Analysis of the discovery sample revealed an inverse relationship between MTX exposure and RA-ILD (adjusted OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.24-0.90; p=0.022), which was confirmed in the replication samples (pooled adjusted OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.79; p=0.009). The combined estimate using both the derivation and validation samples revealed an adjusted OR of 0.43 (95% CI 0.26-0.69; p=0.0006). MTX ever-users were less frequent among patients with RA-ILD compared to those without ILD, irrespective of chest high-resolution computed tomography pattern. In patients with RA-ILD, ILD detection was significantly delayed in MTX ever-users compared to never-users (11.4±10.4 years and 4.0±7.4 years, respectively; p<0.001)., Answer to the Question: Our results suggest that MTX use is not associated with an increased risk of RA-ILD in patients with RA, and that ILD was detected later in MTX-treated patients., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: P-A. Juge has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.S. Lee reports grants from NIH, personal fees for advisory board work from Genentech and Celgene, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: J. Lau has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Kawano-Dourado has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Rojas-Serrano has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Sebastiani has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Koduri has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Matteson has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: K. Bonfiglioli has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Sawamura has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Kairalla has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Cavagna has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Bozzalla Cassione has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Manfredi has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Mejia has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. Rodríguez-Henriquez has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.I. González Pérez has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Falfán-Valencia has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: I. Buendia-Roldán has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Pérez-Rubio has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Ebstein reports personal fees from Sanofi, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: S. Gazal has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Borie reports grants and personal fees for lectures from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: S. Ottaviani has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Kannengiesser has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: B. Wallaert reports grants and personal fees for advisory board work and meeting attendance from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: Y. Uzunhan reports personal fees from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim, non-financial support from Oxyvie, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: H. Nunes has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Valeyre reports personal fees for advisory board work from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees for lectures from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: N. Saidenberg-Kermanac'h has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M-C. Boissier has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Wemeau-Stervinou reports personal fees for lectures and travel support from Roche, personal fees for lectures and advisory board work, and travel support from Boehringer-Ingelheim, personal fees for lectures from Janssen-Cilag and Bristol-Myers-Squibb, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: R.M. Flipo reports grants and personal fees from Roche Chugai, Abbvie and Pfizer, personal fees from Bristol-Meyers Squibb, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: S. Marchand-Adam reports fees for research, lectures, meeting attendance, consultancy and advisory board work from Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim and Novartis, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: P. Richette reports personal fees from Ipsen/Menarini, AstraZeneca, Savient and Grünenthal, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: Y. Allanore reports personal fees from Actelion, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer and Inventiva, grants from Sanofi and Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: C. Dromer has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M-E. Truchetet has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Richez has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T. Schaeverbeke has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H. Lioté has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Thabut reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: K.D. Deane has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Solomon has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T. Doyle has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.H. Ryu has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: I. Rosas reports personal fees for advisory board work from Genentech, Boehringer and Three Lakes Partners, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: V.M. Holers reports grants from NIH/NIAID (U01 Grant), during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: C. Boileau has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M-P. Debray reports personal fees and non-financial support for travel to meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: R. Porcher has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D.A. Schwartz reports grants from NIH-NHLBI (P01 HL092870, R01 HL097163, R33 HL120770 and UH2 HL123442) and DOD Focused Program (W81XWH-17-1-0597), during the conduct of the study; personal fees for consultancy and advisory board work from NuMedii, Inc., and is an employee of Eleven P15, Inc., outside the submitted work; and has a patent Compositions and Methods of Treating or Preventing Fibrotic Diseases pending, a patent Biomarkers for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Fibrotic Lung Disease pending, and a patent Methods and Compositions for Risk Prediction, Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment of Pulmonary Disorders issued. Conflict of interest: R. Vassallo reports grants from Pfizer, Bristol-Myers-Squibb and SunPharma, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: B. Crestani reports grants from Apellis and MedImmune, grants and personal fees for lectures from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, personal fees for lectures from AstraZeneca and Sanofi, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: P. Dieudé reports fees for consultancy from Pfizer, Abbvie and MSD, grants and personal fees for consultancy and lectures from Roche, Chugai and BMS, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©ERS 2021.)

Key Points: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients present exacerbated blood pressure responses to exercise, but little is known regarding the underlying mechanisms involved.  This study assessed autonomic and haemodynamic responses to exercise and to the isolated activation of muscle metaboreflex in post-menopausal women with RA.  Participants with RA showed augmented pressor and sympathetic responses to exercise and to the activation of muscle metaboreflex. These responses were associated with multiple pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and with pain.  The results of the present study support the suggestion that an abnormal reflex control of circulation is an important mechanism underlying the exacerbated cardiovascular response to exercise and increased cardiovascular risk in RA., Abstract: Studies have reported abnormal cardiovascular responses to exercise in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, but little is known regarding the underlying mechanisms involved. This study assessed haemodynamic and sympathetic responses to exercise and to the isolated activation of muscle metaboreflex in women diagnosed with RA. Thirty-three post-menopausal women diagnosed with RA and 10 matched controls (CON) participated in this study. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA frequency and incidence) were measured during a protocol of isometric knee extension exercise (3 min, 30% of maximal voluntary contraction), followed by post-exercise ischaemia (PEI). Participants with RA showed greater increases in MAP and MSNA during exercise and PEI than CON (ΔMAP exercise  = 16 ± 11 vs. 9 ± 6 mmHg, P = 0.03; ΔMAP PEI  = 15 ± 10 vs. 5 ± 5 mmHg, P = 0.001; ΔMSNA exercise  = 17 ± 14 vs. 7 ± 9 bursts min -1 , P = 0.04; ΔMSNA PEI  = 14 ± 10 vs. 6 ± 4 bursts min -1 , P = 0.04). Autonomic responses to exercise showed significant (P < 0.05) association with pro- (i.e. IFN-γ, IL-8, MCP-1 and TNFα) and anti-inflammatory (i.e. IL-1ra and IL-10) cytokines and with pain. In conclusion, post-menopausal women with RA showed augmented pressor and sympathetic responses to exercise and to the activation of muscle metaboreflex. These findings provide mechanistic insights that may explain the abnormal cardiovascular responses to exercise in RA., (© 2020 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2020 The Physiological Society.)

Background: Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) are seen in up to 60% of individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), some of which will progress to have a significant impact on morbidity and mortality rates. Better characterization of progressive interstitial changes and identification of risk factors that are associated with progression may enable earlier intervention and improved outcomes., Research Question: What are baseline characteristics associated with RA-ILD progression?, Study Design and Methods: We performed a retrospective study in which all clinically indicated CT chest scans in adult individuals with RA from 2014 to 2016 were evaluated for interstitial changes, and the data were further subdivided into ILA and ILD based on clinical record review. Progression was determined visually and subsequently semiquantified., Results: Those individuals with a spectrum of interstitial changes (64 of 293) were older male smokers and less likely to be receiving biologics/small molecule disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Of 44% of the individuals with ILA, 46% had had chest CT scans performed for nonpulmonary indications. Of the 56 individuals with ILA/ILD with sequential CT scans, 38% had evidence of radiologic progression over 4.4 years; 29% of of individuals with ILA progressed. Risk factors for progressive ILA/ILD included a subpleural distribution and higher baseline involvement., Interpretation: Of 293 individuals with RA with clinically indicated CT scans, interstitial changes were observed in 22%, one-half of whom had had a respiratory complaint at the time of imaging; radiologic progression was seen in 38%. Of individuals with progressive ILA, one-half had had baseline CT scans performed for nonpulmonary indications. Subpleural distribution and higher baseline ILA/ILD extent were risk factors associated with progression. Prospective longitudinal studies of RA-ILA are necessary., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)