Search

Introduction: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) represent the mainstay for the approval of new treatments. However, stringent inclusion criteria often cause them to depart from the daily clinical practice. Real-world (RW) evidence have a complementing role, filling the gap between the efficacy of a treatment and its effectiveness. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the treatment scenario for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); immune-related adverse events (irAEs) could become life-threatening events, when not timely managed. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the RW impact of irAEs through the years. Methods: The systematic review focused on irAEs occurred in locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients, treated with ICIs in a RW setting. We queried two electronic databases (Embase and Medline) from 1996 to August 2022. We then conducted a meta-analysis dividing the results in two cohorts (2015-2018 and 2019-2021). We described the prevalence of patients with irAEs of any or severe grade (G). Estimates were expressed as proportions up to the second decimal point (effect size, ES). IrAEs of interest were those involving the skin, the liver, the endocrine system or the gastro-intestinal system. Results: Overall, 21 RW studies on 5,439 patients were included in the quantitative and qualitative synthesis. The prevalence of G≥3 irAEs was slightly lower in the 2015-2018 subgroup, while the prevalence of irAEs of any grade was similar for both periods. Overall, we observed a higher ES for gastrointestinal, hepatic and lung irAEs, while a lower ES was reported for skin or endocrine irAEs. Endocrine irAEs were reported in 10 out of 21 studies, with a slight increase in the most recent studies, while cutaneous toxicities were mostly reported in two studies lead within the first time-period. Pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and hepatic toxicities, showed a more heterogeneous distribution of ES over time. Discussion: Our findings showed that the frequency of irAEs remained stable across the two calendar periods examined in our meta-analysis. This finding suggests that RW data might not be able to identify a potential learning curve in detection and management of irAEs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction The observational multicenter prospective FLOWER study (NCT04965701) confirmed effectiveness and safety of osimertinib in the real-world (RW) management of untreated EGFR -mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients. Methods Herein, we report updated survival data, post-progression management, cost/effectiveness and budget impact (BI) of osimertinib compared with a RW population receiving gefitinib or erlotinib. Results Overall, 189 Caucasian patients receiving first-line osimertinib were included. After a follow-up of 20.7 months, 74(39.2%) patients discontinued osimertinib, median time-to-treatment discontinuation (mTTD) was 27.9 months, overall survival 36.8 months. At progression, tissue biopsy was performed in 29 (56.9%), liquid biopsy in 15 (29.4%) and both in 7 (13.7%) cases. The most frequent resistant mechanism was MET amplification (N  = 14, 29.8%). At data cutoff, 13 (6.9%) patients were continuing osimertinib beyond progression; 52 (67.5%) received second-line treatment; no further treatments were administered in 25 (32.5%) cases. Thirty-three (63.4%) patients received chemotherapy, 12(23.1%) TKIs combination. Cost–effectiveness analysis showed a total cost per patient based on RW mTTD of 98,957.34€, 21,726.28€ and 19,637.83€ for osimertinib, erlotinib and gefitinib, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)/month for osimertinib was 359,806.0€/life-year-gained (LYG) and 197,789.77€/LYG compared to erlotinib and gefitinib. For osimertinib, the BI-gap between RW-TTD and theoretical-TTD was 16,501.0€ per patient. Conclusions This updated analysis confirms the effectiveness of osimertinib in RW. Although the ICER of osimertinib seems not cost-effective, additional costs for the management of disease progression to old generation TKIs were not considered in this study. The BI-gap suggests RW mTTD as a more reliable measure for expense estimation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Without highly qualified nurse anesthesia educators and administrators, the health care system will be threatened by the inadequate supply of certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs). Purpose: American Association of Nurse Anesthesiologists' Faculty Stabilization Task Force (FSTF) analyzed reasons for high faculty turnover and developed recommendations to support nurse anesthesia faculty and administrators. Methods: A survey evaluated participants' current role, leadership development opportunities, mentorship experiences, and resource needs. Results: Of 109 respondents, 87 (80%) were program administrators or assistant administrators with less than 5 years of experience in their role. Despite academic experience, 51% felt adequately prepared for their role. Conclusions: The FSTF provided 2 recommendations: to create a robust faculty development program for all faculty at all levels of CRNA education and a repository of information needed for program administrators and faculty to oversee and educate students in a high-quality CRNA program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) and B-Raf (BRAF) mutations are two of the most important drivers identified in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This report highlights two cases of patients diagnosed with metastatic NSCLC bearing concurrent EGFR and BRAF mutations at baseline and treated with osimertinib as first-line treatment. Molecular profiling was conducted in the tissue and plasma at the time of initial diagnosis, and subsequent repeated liquid biopsy examinations were planned after 10 days, 28 days, and at the time of radiological progression in the frame of the prospective translational study REM. These cases suggest that osimertinib may maintain its therapeutic effectiveness even in patients presenting with a baseline BRAF co-mutation. Notably, radiological responses align with liquid biopsy observations: in both instances, follow-up liquid biopsies indicate the clearance of EGFR-mutated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Extensive stage-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) is an aggressive cancer with dismal prognosis. The addition of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to platinum-based chemotherapy have been consistently demonstrated to improve outcomes and survival, becoming the new standard in first - line treatment of ES-SCLC patients. However, despite positive results reported in the pivotal trials, longer benefit appears evident only for a selected group of patients. Several predictive biomarkers have been studied so far but the prospective identification of patients more likely to experience better outcome seems to be challenging in SCLC. Indeed, classical immune predictive biomarkers as PD-L1 and tumor mutational burden (TMB) seem not to correlate with outcomes. Recently, a new molecular classification of SCLC based on differential expression of genes associated with specific clinical behaviors and therapeutic vulnerability have been presented suggesting a new field to be investigated. Despite the achievements, these studies focused mainly on inter-tumoral heterogeneity, limiting the exploration of intra-tumoral heterogeneity and cell to cell interactions. New analysis methods are ongoing in order to explore subtypes plasticity. Analysis on single biopsies cannot catch the whole genomic profile and dynamic change of disease over time and during treatment. Moreover, the availability of tissue for translational research is limited due to the low proportion of patients undergoing surgery. In this context, liquid biopsy is a promising tool to detect reliable predictive biomarkers. Here, we reviewed the current available data on predictive role of tissue and liquid biomarkers in ES-SCLC patients receiving ICIs. We assessed latest results in terms of predictive and prognostic value of gene expression profiling in SCLC. Finally, we explored the role of liquid biopsy as a tool to monitor SCLC patients over time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) constitute a challenge in the clinical management of solid tumors. This study aims to collect real-world data on the occurrence of immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis (IMDC) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and to assess the clinical impact of a multidisciplinary approach (MDA) on IMDC management. Methods We retrospectively collected data on patients with aNSCLC consecutively treated with ICIs, either as single agent or in combination with chemotherapy, between September 2013 and July 2022. Among patients developing IMDC, we conducted blinded revision of colonic biopsies and evaluated the clinical impact of the introduction of MDA through predefined indicators. Results Among the 607 patients included, 84 (13.8%) experienced IMDC. Pathological review highlighted a high prevalence of microscopic colitis (28%), with a collagenous pattern linked to longer symptoms duration (P  = .01). IMDC occurred more frequently in females (P  = .05) and PD-L1 expressors (P  = .014) and was correlated with longer progression-free survival (17.0 vs 5.8, P  < .001) and overall survival (28.3 vs 9.5, P  < .001). The introduction of MDA was associated with increased employment of diagnostical tools such as fecal calprotectin test (P  < .001), colonoscopy (P  < .001), and gastroenterological evaluation (P  = .017) and a significant decrease in both grade 3 conversion rate (P  = .046) and recurrence after rechallenge (P  = .016). Hospitalization rate dropped from 17.2% to 3.8% (P : ns). Conclusion These findings highlight the clinical relevance of IMDC and support the incorporation of a MDA to optimize the clinical management of this irAE to improve patient care. Prospective validation has been planned. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]