Search

Hilary C Strollo,1 Seyed M Nouraie,1 Karin F Hoth,2 Craig M Riley,3 Chad Karoleski,1 Yingze Zhang,1 Nicola A Hanania,4 Russell P Bowler,5,6 Jessica Bon,1 Frank C Sciurba1 1University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Department of Pulmonary Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; 2University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Iowa City, IA, USA; 3Chester County Hospital, University of Pennsylvania Health System, West Chester, PA, USA; 4Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; 5National Jewish Health, Department of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA; 6University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USACorrespondence: Hilary C StrolloUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Department of Pulmonary Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, NW 628 UPMC Montefiore, 3459 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USATel +1 412-692-2210Fax +1 412-692-4842Email strolloh2@upmc.eduRationale: Depression is a prevalent comorbidity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that, along with COPD, has been associated with inflammation. An association between inflammation and depression in COPD has not been validated in a large COPD cohort.Methods: Individuals from the University of Pittsburgh SCCOR cohort and the COPDGene cohort with tobacco use history and airway obstruction (FEV1/FVC < 0.7) were evaluated using the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), respectively. Participants completed symptom-related questionnaires and plasma IL-6 measurements. T-test, Fisher’s Exact tests and logistic regression were used for statistical analysis.Results: The SCCOR cohort included 220 obstructed participants: 44% female and 21.4% with elevated depressive symptoms. GOLD staging distribution was predominantly stage I and II. The COPDGene cohort included 745 obstructed participants: 44% female and 13.0% with elevated depressive symptoms. GOLD distribution was predominantly stage II and III. In the SCCOR cohort, correlation between IL-6 and depressive symptoms trended toward significance (p= 0.08). Multivariable modeling adjusted for FEV1, age, gender and medical comorbidities showed a significant association (OR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.08– 2.69). IL-6 was significantly associated with elevated depressive symptoms in COPDGene in both univariate (p=0.001) and multivariable modeling (OR = 1.52, 95% CI =1.13– 2.04).Conclusion: Elevated plasma IL-6 levels are associated with depressive symptoms in individuals with COPD independent of airflow limitation and comorbid risk factors for depression. Our results suggest that systemic inflammation may play a significant and possibly bidirectional role in depression associated with COPD.Keywords: IL-6, depression, beck depression inventory, BDI, HADS, TNF-a, CRP, SCCOR, COPDGene

BackgroundUteroglobin is a multifunctional protein with anti-inflammatory properties. Studies have revealed the importance of inflammation in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) pathogenesis. Here, we investigated the relationship between uteroglobin and T2D.MethodsWe performed diagnostic tests for diabetes in subjects who had not been diagnosed with or treated for T2D. We established three groups, containing those with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), prediabetes and T2D, consisting of 80 people each, and compared their uteroglobin levels. In addition, 28 patients newly diagnosed with T2D were treated with metformin for 12 weeks, and 63 patients newly diagnosed with dyslipidaemia during the treatment for T2D were treated with statin for 12 weeks.ResultsThis study showed that uteroglobin levels were significantly lower in prediabetes and T2D groups than in the NGT group. Uteroglobin levels were not significantly correlated with other metabolic parameters, except BMI, HOMA-β and eGFR. In the group treated with metformin or statin, uteroglobin levels increased after treatment compared to before treatment.ConclusionsUteroglobin is a sensitive factor that was decreased even in prediabetes and increased upon treatment with drugs with anti-inflammatory effects. Uteroglobin is a potential early biomarker that reflects a chronic inflammatory condition in T2D.

Abstract A for-cause biopsy is performed to diagnose the cause of allograft dysfunction in kidney transplantation. We occasionally encounter ambiguous biopsy results in symptomatic kidney transplant recipients. Yet, the allograft survival outcome in symptomatic recipients with nonspecific allograft biopsy findings remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of nonspecific for-cause biopsy findings in symptomatic kidney transplant recipients. We retrospectively collected records from 773 kidney transplant recipients between January 2008 and October 2021. The characteristics of transplant recipients with nonspecific findings in the first for-cause biopsy were analyzed. Nonspecific allograft biopsy findings were defined as other biopsy findings excluding rejection, borderline rejection, calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, infection, glomerulonephritis, and diabetic nephropathy. The graft outcome was compared between recipients who had never undergone a for-cause biopsy and those who had a first for-cause biopsy with nonspecific findings. The graft survival in recipients with nonspecific for-cause biopsy findings was comparable to that in recipients who did not require the for-cause biopsy before and after propensity score matching. Even in symptomatic kidney transplant recipients, nonspecific allograft biopsy findings might not be a poor prognostic factor for allograft survival compared to recipients who did not require the for-cause biopsy.

Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) induces endothelial dysfunction and inflammation, which are the main factors for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. The present study aimed to compare the effects of rosuvastatin monotherapy and rosuvastatin/ezetimibe combination therapy on lipid profile, insulin sensitivity, and vascular inflammatory response in patients with T2DM. Methods A total of 101 patients with T2DM and dyslipidemia were randomized to either rosuvastatin monotherapy (5 mg/day, n=47) or rosuvastatin/ezetimibe combination therapy (5 mg/10 mg/day, n=45) and treated for 12 weeks. Serum lipids, glucose, insulin, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), and peroxiredoxin 4 (PRDX4) levels were determined before and after 12 weeks of treatment. Results The reduction in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by more than 50% from baseline after treatment was more in the combination therapy group. The serum sICAM-1 levels increased significantly in both groups, but there was no difference between the two groups. The significant changes in homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and PRDX4 were confirmed only in the subgroup in which LDL-C was reduced by 50% or more in the combination therapy group. However, after adjusting for diabetes mellitus duration and hypertension, the changes in HOMA-IR and PRDX4 were not significant between the two groups. Conclusion Although rosuvastatin/ezetimibe combination therapy had a greater LDL-C reduction effect than rosuvastatin monotherapy, it had no additional effects on insulin sensitivity and vascular inflammatory response. Further studies are needed on the effect of long-term treatment with ezetimibe on insulin sensitivity and vascular inflammatory response.