Search

Inside individual cells, expression of genes is stochastic across organisms ranging from bacterial to human cells. A ubiquitous feature of stochastic expression is burst-like synthesis of gene products, which drives considerable intercellular variability in protein levels across an isogenic cell population. One common mechanism by which cells control such stochasticity is negative feedback regulation, where a protein inhibits its own synthesis. For a single gene that is expressed in bursts, negative feedback can affect the burst frequency or the burst size. In order to compare these feedback types, we study a piecewise deterministic model for gene expression of a self-regulating gene. Mathematically tractable steady-state protein distributions are derived and used to compare the noise suppression abilities of the two feedbacks. Results show that in the low noise regime, both feedbacks are similar in term of their noise buffering abilities. Intriguingly, feedback in burst size outperforms the feedback in burst frequency in the high noise regime. Finally, we discuss various regulatory strategies by which cells implement feedback to control burst sizes of expressed proteins at the level of single cells., Comment: 27 pages, 11 figures

Transcription factors (TFs) interact with a multitude of binding sites on DNA and partner proteins inside cells. We investigate how nonspecific binding/unbinding to such decoy binding sites affects the magnitude and time-scale of random fluctuations in TF copy numbers arising from stochastic gene expression. A stochastic model of TF gene expression, together with decoy site interactions is formulated. Distributions for the total (bound and unbound) and free (unbound) TF levels are derived by analytically solving the chemical master equation under physiologically relevant assumptions. Our results show that increasing the number of decoy binding sides considerably reduces stochasticity in free TF copy numbers. The TF autocorrelation function reveals that decoy sites can either enhance or shorten the time-scale of TF fluctuations depending on model parameters. To understand how noise in TF abundances propagates downstream, a TF target gene is included in the model. Intriguingly, we find that noise in the expression of the target gene decreases with increasing decoy sites for linear TF-target protein dose-responses, even in regimes where decoy sites enhance TF autocorrelation times. Moreover, counterintuitive noise transmissions arise for nonlinear dose-responses. In summary, our study highlights the critical role of molecular sequestration by decoy binding sites in regulating the stochastic dynamics of TFs and target proteins at the single-cell level., Comment: 10 pages, 5 figures, Physical Biology