Search

Background: Both lung transplant recipients and candidates are characterised by reduced training capacity and low average quality of life (QoL). This review investigates the impact of training on exercise ability and QoL in patients before and after lung transplant., Methods: Searches were conducted from the beginning to 7 March 2022 using the terms "exercise," "rehabilitation," "lung transplant," "exercise ability," "survival," "quality of life" and "telerehabilitation" in six databases, including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, CINAHL, Nursing and Allied Health, and Scopus. The inclusion criteria were studies evaluating the effects of an exercise training programme concurrent with lung transplantation as well as patients and candidates (>18 years old) through any lung diseases. The term "lung transplant rehabilitation" was used to refer to all carefully thought-out physical activities with the ultimate or intermediate objective of improving or maintaining physical health., Results: Out of 1422 articles, 10 clinical- and 3 telerehabilitation studies, candidates (n = 420) and recipients (n = 116) were related to the criteria and included in this review. The main outcome significantly improved in all studies. The 6-min walk distance, maximum exercise capacity, peak oxygen uptake, or endurance for constant load rate cycling improved measuring physical activity [aerobic exercises, breathing training, and aerobic and inspiratory muscle training sessions (IMT)]. Overall scores for dyspnoea improved after exercise training. Furthermore, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) also improved after aerobic exercise training, which was performed unsupervised or accompanied by breathing sessions. Aerobic training alone rather than combined with inspiratory muscle- (IMT) or breathing training enhanced exercise capacity., Conclusion: In conclusion, rehabilitation programmes seem to be beneficial to patients both preceding and following lung transplantation. More studies are required to determine the best training settings in terms of time scale, frequency, and work intensity in terms of improving exercise ability, dyspnoea, and HRQOL.

Introduction: The prognostic value of lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) has already been evaluated in a wide range of malignancies including patients with non-surgically managed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, the impact of LMR on survival in surgically treated SCLC patients has not yet been assessed. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical role of LMR in patients undergoing surgical resection for SCLC., Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, individuals receiving radical surgery for SCLC between January 2000 and December 2019 from three participating European institutions were included. LMR was calculated from the most recent blood test prior to surgery. Optimal cut-off values for LMR were determined and correlated with clinical data and survival outcomes., Results: In total, 101 patients underwent surgical resection for SCLC during the study period. 76 (75.2%) received anatomic lung resection (defined as lobectomy or pneumonectomy), 63 (62.4%) were male and the median age was 63 (range 41-80) years. LMR > 2.50 significantly associated with improved overall survival (OS) (35.3 vs. 20.7 months, p = 0.032) and disease-free survival (DFS) (25.8 vs 18.5 months, p = 0.011). Moreover, multivariate Cox proportional hazard model identified LMR > 2.50 as an independent prognostic factor of longer OS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.617; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.383-0.993; p = 0.047) and DFS (HR 0.505; 95% CI 0.266-0.959; p = 0.037)., Conclusion: Preoperatively elevated LMR is a robust prognostic factor associated with improved OS and DFS in patients undergoing surgery for SCLC. Further studies are warranted to better understand the overall impact of LMR when applying surgery in these patients., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)