Search

Your search keyword '"Bochner, F."' showing total 405 results
Start Over Author "Bochner, F."
405 results on '"Bochner, F."'

9. Buprenorphine maintenance subjects are hyperalgesic and have no antinociceptive response to a very high morphine dose.

Author

Somogyi, AA, Athanasos, P, Ling, W, Bochner, F, White, JM, Somogyi, AA, Athanasos, P, Ling, W, Bochner, F, and White, JM

Abstract

Acute pain management in opioid-dependent persons is complicated because of tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Very high doses of morphine are ineffective in overcoming opioid-induced hyperalgesia and providing antinociception to methadone-maintained patients in an experimental setting. Whether the same occurs in buprenorphine-maintained subjects is unknown. Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled. Subjects were tested on two occasions, at least five days apart, once with intravenous morphine and once with intravenous saline. Subjects were tested at about the time of putative trough plasma buprenorphine concentrations. Ambulatory. Twelve buprenorphine-maintained subjects: once daily sublingual dose (range = 2-22 mg); no dose change for 1.5-12 months. Ten healthy controls. Intravenous morphine bolus and infusions administered over two hours to achieve two separate pseudo-steady-state plasma concentrations one hour apart. Pain tolerance was assessed by application of nociceptive stimuli (cold pressor [seconds] and electrical stimulation [volts]). Ten blood samples were collected for assay of plasma morphine, buprenorphine, and norbuprenorphine concentrations until three hours after the end of the last infusion; pain tolerance and respiration rate were measured to coincide with blood sampling times. Cold pressor responses (seconds): baseline: control 34 ± 6 vs buprenorphine 17 ± 2 (P = 0.009); morphine infusion-end: control 52 ± 11(P = 0.04), buprenorphine 17 ± 2 (P > 0.5); electrical stimulation responses (volts): baseline: control 65 ± 6 vs buprenorphine 53 ± 5 (P = 0.13); infusion-end: control 74 ± 5 (P = 0.007), buprenorphine 53 ± 5 (P > 0.98). Respiratory rate (breaths per minute): baseline: control 17 vs buprenorphine 14 (P = 0.03); infusion-end: control 15 (P = 0.09), buprenorphine 12 (P < 0.01). Infusion-end plasma morphine concentrations (ng/mL): control 23 ± 1, buprenorphine 136 ± 10. Buprenorphine subjects, compared with controls, were hyperalgesi

Published
2018

22. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of (R)- and (S)-methadone in methadone maintenance patients

Author

Foster, Djr, Somogyi, Aa, Dyer, Kr, Jason White, and Bochner, F.

Subjects
Adult, Male, Narcotics, Pyrrolidines, Substance-Related Disorders, Individuality, Stereoisomerism, Orosomucoid, Middle Aged, Kidney, Substrate Specificity, Area Under Curve, Linear Models, Humans, Pharmacokinetics, Female, Methadone, Protein Binding
Abstract

To investigate the steady-state pharmacokinetics of (R)- and (S)-methadone in a methadone maintenance population.Eighteen patients recruited from a public methadone maintenance program underwent an interdosing interval pharmacokinetic study. Plasma and urine samples were collected and analysed for methadone and its major metabolite (EDDP) using stereoselective h.p.l.c. Methadone plasma protein binding was examined using ultrafiltration, and plasma alpha1-acid glycoprotein concentrations were quantified by radial immunoassay.(R)-methadone had a significantly (P0.05) greater unbound fraction (mean 173%) and total renal clearance (182%) compared with (S)-methadone, while maximum measured plasma concentrations (83%) and apparent partial clearance of methadone to EDDP (76%) were significantly (P0.001) lower. When protein binding was considered (R)-methadone plasma clearance of the unbound fraction (59%) and apparent partial intrinsic clearance to EDDP (44%) were significantly (P0.01) lower than for (S)-methadone, while AUCtau_¿u¿ss (167%) was significantly (P0. 001) greater. There were no significant (P0.2) differences between the methadone enantiomers for AUCtauss, steady-state plasma clearance, trough plasma concentrations and unbound renal clearance. Patients excreted significantly (P0.0001) more (R)-methadone and (S)-EDDP than the corresponding enantiomers. Considerable interindividual variability was observed for the pharmacokinetic parameters, with coefficients of variation of up to 70%.Steady-state pharmacokinetics of unbound methadone are stereoselective, and there is large interindividual variability consistent with CYP3A4 mediated metabolism to the major metabolite EDDP; the variability did not obscure a significant dose-plasma concentration relationship. Stereoselective differences in the pharmacokinetics of methadone may have important implications for pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling but is unlikely to be important for therapeutic drug monitoring of methadone, in the setting of opioid dependence.

Published
2000

46. Evaluation of levo-alpha acetylmethodol (LAAM) as an alternative treatment for methadone maintenance patients who regularly experience withdrawal: a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis.

Author

Newcombe DAL, Bochner F, White JM, and Somogyi AA

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine if substitution of daily methadone with second daily levo-alpha-acetylmethadol (LAAM) would convert non-holders on methadone into holders on LAAM, and to compare plasma concentration-time profiles of (R)-methadone with LAAM and its two metabolites. Sixteen stable methadone maintenance treatment participants (non-holders, n = 8) were randomly allocated to continue methadone for 3 months or switch to LAAM for 3 months, and then crossed over to the alternative drug for 3 months. At steady state, there were two testing sessions (24 h for methadone and 48 h for LAAM), during which opioid withdrawal severity, respiration rate and pupil diameter were measured 10-11 times and venous blood was collected 13-15 times. Ten age- and gender-matched controls underwent one 48-h test session. Areas under the withdrawal severity score versus time curve (AUC(0-47) hours for LAAM and controls; AUC(0-24) x 2 for methadone) were similar in holders on methadone and LAAM (P = 0.62), but were greater in non-holders when they were taking methadone than LAAM (P < 0.001). Respiratory depression and pupillary constriction were similar for LAAM and methadone. In comparison to (R)-methadone, plasma nor- and dinor-LAAM concentrations fluctuated little over the dosing interval. LAAM converted methadone non-holders into LAAM holders. LAAM may therefore be useful in selected MMT non-holders and improve retention in opioid treatment programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2004
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results