Search

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) increases the feasibility of surgical resection by downstaging large primary breast tumors and nodal involvement, which may result in surgical de-escalation and improved outcomes. This subanalysis from the Multi-Institutional Neo-adjuvant Therapy MammaPrint Project I (MINT) trial evaluated the association between MammaPrint and BluePrint with nodal downstaging., Patients and Methods: The prospective MINT trial (NCT01501487) enrolled 387 patients between 2011 and 2016 aged ≥ 18 years with invasive breast cancer (T2-T4). This subanalysis includes 146 patients with stage II-III, lymph node positive, who received NCT. MammaPrint stratifies tumors as having a Low Risk or High Risk of distant metastasis. Together with MammaPrint, BluePrint genomically (g) categorizes tumors as gLuminal A, gLuminal B, gHER2, or gBasal., Results: Overall, 45.2% (n = 66/146) of patients had complete nodal downstaging, of whom 60.6% (n = 40/66) achieved a pathologic complete response. MammaPrint and combined MammaPrint and BluePrint were significantly associated with nodal downstaging (p = 0.007 and p < 0.001, respectively). A greater proportion of patients with MammaPrint High Risk tumors had nodal downstaging compared with Low Risk (p = 0.007). When classified with MammaPrint and BluePrint, more patients with gLuminal B, gHER2, and gBasal tumors had nodal downstaging compared with HR+HER2-, gLuminal A tumors (p = 0.538, p < 0.001, and p = 0.013, respectively)., Conclusions: Patients with genomically High Risk tumors, defined by MammaPrint with or without BluePrint, respond better to NCT and have a higher likelihood of nodal downstaging compared with patients with gLuminal A tumors. These genomic signatures can be used to select node-positive patients who are more likely to have nodal downstaging and avoid invasive surgical procedures., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: As more patients with early-stage breast cancer receive neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET), there is a need for reliable biomarkers that can identify patients with HR+ HER2- tumors who are likely to benefit from NET. NBRST (NCT01479101) compared the prognostic value of the 70-gene risk classification and 80-gene molecular subtyping signatures with conventional pathological classification methods in response to neoadjuvant therapy. We evaluated the association of these signatures with clinical response and 5-year outcome of patients treated with NET., Methods: 1091 patients with early-stage breast cancer scheduled to receive neoadjuvant therapy were prospectively enrolled into NBRST, and a sub-analysis of 67 patients treated with NET was performed. Patients received standard of care genomic testing using the 70-gene and 80-gene signatures and were treated with NET, per physician's discretion. The primary endpoint was pathologic partial response (pPR) and secondary endpoints were distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS). Clinical benefit was defined as having a pPR or stable disease (SD) with NET., Results: Overall, 94.4% of patients with genomically (g) Luminal A-Type (50.0% pPR and 44.4% SD) and 95.0% with Luminal B-Type tumors (55.0% pPR and 40.0% SD) exhibited clinical benefit. At 5 years, patients with gLuminal B tumors had significantly worse DMFS (75.6%, 95% CI 50.8-89.1) than patients with gLuminal A (91.1%; 95% CI 74.8-97.1; p = 0.047), with a similar trend for OS, albeit not significant (81.0%, 95% CI 56.9-92.4 and 91.1%, 95% CI 74.8-97.1, respectively; p = 0.13)., Conclusions: Genomic assays offer a broader understanding of the underlying tumor biology, which adds precision to pathology as a preoperative risk classifier. Patients with 70-gene signature Low Risk, gLuminal A tumors treated with endocrine therapy alone have excellent 5-year outcomes. Most patients with genomically-defined Luminal A- and B-Type tumors respond well to NET, suggesting these patients may be safely treated with NET, while those with gLuminal B tumors will also require post-operative chemotherapy or CDK4/6 inhibitors to improve long-term outcomes. Overall, these findings demonstrate that genomic classification, defined by the combined 70- and 80-gene signatures, is associated with tumor response and prognostic of long-term outcomes., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The prospective Neoadjuvant Breast Registry Symphony Trial compared the 80-gene molecular subtyping signature with clinical assessment by immunohistochemistry and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization in predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) and 5-year outcomes in patients with early-stage breast cancer., Methods: Standard-of-care neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with trastuzumab or trastuzumab plus pertuzumab was given to patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive tumors (n = 295). pCR was the primary end point, with secondary end points of distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival at 5 years., Results: Among clinically defined HER2-positive (cHER2) tumors, the 80-gene assay identified 29.5% (87 of 295) as Luminal-Type (cHER2/gLuminal), 14.9% (44 of 295) as Basal-Type (cHER2/gBasal), and 55.6% (164 of 295) as HER2-Type (cHER2/genomically classified as HER2 [gHER2]). Patients with cHER2/gHER2 tumors had a higher pCR rate (61.6%) compared with non-gHER2 tumors (26.7%; P < .001). Dual targeting for cHER2/gHER2 tumors yielded a higher pCR rate (75%) compared with those treated with single HER2-targeted therapy (54%; P = .006). For cHER2/gBasal tumors, the 42.9% pCR rate observed with dual targeting was not different from that with trastuzumab alone (46.4%; P = .830). Among those with cHER2/gBasal tumors, 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (68.6%; 95% CI, 49.1 to 81.9) was significantly worse than in patients with cHER2/gLuminal tumors (88.9%; 95% CI, 78.0 to 94.6) and cHER2/gHER2 tumors (87.4%; 95% CI, 80.2 to 92.2; P = .010), with similar corresponding overall survival differences., Conclusion: The 80-gene assay identified meaningful genomic diversity in patients with cHER2 disease. Patients with cHER2/gHER2 tumors, who benefitted most from dual HER2-targeted therapy, accounted for approximately half of the cHER2 cohort. Genomically Luminal tumors had low pCR rates but good 5-year outcomes. cHER2/gBasal tumors derived no benefit from dual therapy and had significantly worse 5-year prognosis; these patients merit special consideration in future trials., Competing Interests: Pat W. WhitworthEmployment: Integra LifeSciences (I)Leadership: Integra LifeSciences (I)Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Targeted Medical Education Inc, Integra LifeSciences (I)Honoraria: Puma BiotechnologyConsulting or Advisory Role: ImpediMed, Prelude Therapeutics, Becton DickinsonResearch Funding: Prelude Therapeutics, Agendia, MedneonTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Targeted Medical Education Inc Peter D. BeitschEmployment: InvitaeLeadership: Targeted Medical Education IncStock and Other Ownership Interests: Targeted Medical Education Inc, InvitaeResearch Funding: InvitaeExpert Testimony: Dune Medical Devices, ImpediMedUncompensated Relationships: Medneon Paul D. RichardsStock and Other Ownership Interests: NanoViricidesResearch Funding: Carrick Therapeutics (Inst) James V. PellicaneStock and Other Ownership Interests: PreludeDxHonoraria: Agendia, PreludeDxSpeakers' Bureau: Agendia, PreludeDx Beth B. DupreeLeadership: Caliber MedicalStock and Other Ownership Interests: Videra SurgicalHonoraria: Medtronic, Perimeter Medical William DooleyLeadership: Shaga Medical LLCStock and Other Ownership Interests: Shaga MedicalResearch Funding: Agendia, XoftPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: patent pending—microendoscopy system Shiyu WangEmployment: Agendia Patricia DauerEmployment: AgendiaStock and Other Ownership Interests: AgendiaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Agendia Andrea R. MenicucciEmployment: Agendia Erin B. YoderEmployment: AgendiaStock and Other Ownership Interests: AgendiaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Agendia Lisa E. BlumencranzEmployment: Agendia William AudehEmployment: AgendiaLeadership: AgendiaStock and Other Ownership Interests: AgendiaConsulting or Advisory Role: Celanese, Private HealthResearch Funding: AgendiaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AgendiaNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Background: The Neoadjuvant Breast Symphony Trial (NBRST) demonstrated the 70-gene risk of distant recurrence signature, MammaPrint, and the 80-gene molecular subtyping signature, BluePrint, precisely determined preoperative pathological complete response (pCR) in breast cancer patients. We report 5-year follow-up results in addition to an exploratory analysis by age and menopausal status., Methods: The observational, prospective NBRST (NCT01479101) included 954 early-stage breast cancer patients aged 18-90 years who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and had clinical and genomic data available. Chemosensitivity and 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. In a post hoc subanalysis, results were stratified by age (≤ 50 vs. > 50 years) and menopausal status in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) tumors., Results: MammaPrint and BluePrint further classified 23% of tumors to a different subtype compared with immunohistochemistry, with more precise correspondence to pCR rates. Five-year DMFS and OS were highest in MammaPrint Low Risk, Luminal A-type and HER2-type tumors, and lowest in MammaPrint High Risk, Luminal B-type and Basal-type tumors. There was no significant difference in chemosensitivity between younger and older patients with Low-Risk (2.2% vs. 3.8%; p = 0.64) or High-Risk tumors (14.5% vs. 11.5%; p = 0.42), or within each BluePrint subtype; this was similar when stratifying by menopausal status. The 5-year outcomes were comparable by age or menopausal status for each molecular subtype., Conclusion: Intrinsic preoperative chemosensitivity and long-term outcomes were precisely determined by BluePrint and MammaPrint regardless of patient age, supporting the utility of these assays to inform treatment and surgical decisions in early-stage breast cancer., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Purpose: The 80-gene molecular subtyping signature (80-GS) reclassifies a proportion of immunohistochemistry (IHC)-defined luminal breast cancers (estrogen receptor-positive [ER+], human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative [HER2-]) as Basal-Type. We report the association of 80-GS reclassification with neoadjuvant treatment response and 5-year outcome in patients with breast cancer., Methods: Neoadjuvant Breast Registry Symphony Trial (NBRST; NCT01479101) is an observational, prospective study that included 1,069 patients with early-stage breast cancer age 18-90 years who received neoadjuvant therapy. Pathologic complete response (pCR) and 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed in 477 patients with IHC-defined ER+, HER2- tumors and in a reference group of 229 patients with IHC-defined triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)., Results: 80-GS reclassified 15% of ER+, HER2- tumors (n = 73) as Basal-Type (ER+/Basal), which had similar pCR compared with TNBC/Basal tumors (34% v 38%; P = .52), and significantly higher pCR than ER+/Luminal A (2%; P < .001) and ER+/Luminal B (6%; P < .001) tumors. The 5-year DMFS (%, [95% CI]) was significantly lower for patients with ER+/Basal tumors (66% [52.6 to 77.3]), compared with those with ER+/Luminal A tumors (92.3% [85.2 to 96.1]) and ER+/Luminal B tumors (73.5% [44.5 to 79.3]). Importantly, patients with ER+/Basal or TNBC/Basal tumors that had a pCR exhibited significantly improved DMFS and OS compared with those with residual disease. By contrast, patients with ER+/Luminal B tumors had comparable 5-year DMFS and OS whether or not they achieved pCR., Conclusion: Significant differences in chemosensitivity and 5-year outcome suggest patients with ER+/Basal molecular subtype may benefit from neoadjuvant regimens optimized for patients with TNBC/Basal tumors compared with patients with ER+/Luminal subtype. These data highlight the importance of identifying this subset of patients to improve treatment planning and long-term survival., Competing Interests: Pat W. WhitworthEmployment: Integra LifeSciencesLeadership: Integra LifeSciencesStock and Other Ownership Interests: Targeted Medical Education, Inc, Cerebrotech Medical Systems, Medneon, Integra LifeSciencesHonoraria: Puma BiotechnologyConsulting or Advisory Role: ImpediMed, Prelude Therapeutics, Becton DickinsonResearch Funding: Prelude Therapeutics, Agendia, MedneonTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Targeted Medical Education, Inc Peter D. BeitschEmployment: InVitaeLeadership: Targeted Medical Education, IncStock and Other Ownership Interests: Targeted Medical Education, Inc, InVitaeResearch Funding: InVitaeExpert Testimony: Dune Medical Devices, ImpediMedUncompensated Relationships: Medneon James V. PellicaneStock and Other Ownership Interests: PreludeDxHonoraria: Agendia, PreludeDxSpeakers' Bureau: Agendia, PreludeDx Paul L. BaronHonoraria: Myriad GeneticsConsulting or Advisory Role: Myriad GeneticsSpeakers' Bureau: Myriad GeneticsTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Myriad Genetics William C. DooleyLeadership: Shaga Medical, LLCStock and Other Ownership Interests: Shaga MedicalResearch Funding: Agendia, XoftPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patent pending: microendoscopy system Kenneth H. CowanStock and Other Ownership Interests: United Health GroupConsulting or Advisory Role: MerckResearch Funding: Merck Beth-Ann LesnikoskiEmployment: HCA HealthcareStock and Other Ownership Interests: HCA HealthcareResearch Funding: Agendia (Inst), Seattle Genetics (Inst)Open Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/246359 Beth B. DupreeHonoraria: Medtronic Shiyu WangEmployment: AgendiaStock and Other Ownership Interests: Agendia Andrea R. MenicucciEmployment: Agendia Erin B. YoderEmployment: AgendiaStock and Other Ownership Interests: AgendiaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Agendia Kate CorcoranEmployment: Agendia Lisa E. BlumencranzEmployment: Agendia William AudehEmployment: AgendiaLeadership: AgendiaStock and Other Ownership Interests: AgendiaConsulting or Advisory Role: Celanese, Private HealthResearch Funding: AgendiaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AgendiaNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy have become the standard of care for staging the axilla in patients with invasive breast cancer. Current histologic methods for SLN evaluation have limitations, including subjectivity, limited sensitivity, and lack of standardization. The discovery of molecular markers to detect metastases has been reported over the last 2 decades. The authors review the historical development of these markers and the clinical use of one of the molecular platforms in 478 patients at their institution. Controversies and future directions are discussed., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)