Search

Intradermal injection of anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies in dogs grossly and histologically resemble naturally occurring atopic dermatitis (AD). However, the activated inflammatory and pruritic pathways have not been characterized. The objectives of this study were to characterize the inflammatory transcriptome of experimental acute canine IgE-induced lesions and to determine how these correlate to the transcriptome of naturally occurring human and canine acute atopic dermatitis. Biopsies were collected at 6 and 24 h after intradermal injections of anticanine-IgE antibodies to eight healthy male castrated Beagles; healthy and saline-injected skin served as controls. We extracted total RNA from skin biopsies and analyzed transcriptome using RNA-sequencing. Gene expressions of IgE-induced biopsies were compared to that of controls from the same subject (1.5-fold change, p-adjusted value ≤ 0.05). Acute IgE-mediated lesions had a significant upregulation of pro-inflammatory (e.g., LTB, IL-1B, PTX3, CCL2, IL6, IL8, IL18), T helper-(Th)1/IFNγ signal (e.g., STAT-1, OASL, MX-1, CXCL10, IL-12A) and Th2 (e.g., IL4R, IL5, IL13, IL33 and POSTN) genes, as well as Th2 chemokines (CCL17, CCL24). Pathway analysis revealed strong significant upregulation of JAK-STAT, histamine, IL-4 and IL13 signaling. Spearman correlation coefficient for the shared DEGs between canine anti-canine-IgE and human AD samples revealed a significant moderate positive correlation for anti-canine-IgE 6-h samples (r = 0.53) and 24-h samples (r = 0.47). In conclusion, acute canine IgE-mediated skin lesions exhibit a multipolar immunological axis upregulation (Th1, Th2 and Th17) in healthy dogs, resembling acute spontaneous human AD lesions.

Plants deploy a variety of chemical and physical defenses to protect themselves against herbivores and pathogens. Organic farming seeks to enhance these responses by improving soil quality, ultimately altering bottom up regulation of plant defenses. While laboratory studies suggest this approach is effective, it remains unclear whether organic agriculture encourages more-active plant defenses under real-world conditions. Working on the farms of cooperating growers, we examined gene expression in the leaves of two potato (Solanum tuberosum) varieties, grown on organic vs. conventional farms. For one variety, Norkotah, we found significantly heightened initiation of genes associated with plant-defense pathways in plants grown in organic vs. conventional fields. Organic Norkotah fields exhibited lower levels of nitrate in soil and of nitrogen in plant foliage, alongside differences in communities of soil bacteria, suggesting possible links between soil management and observed differences in plant defenses. Additionally, numbers of predatory and phloem-feeding insects were higher in organic than conventional fields. A second potato variety, Alturas, which is generally grown using fewer inputs and in poorer-quality soils, exhibited lower overall herbivore and predator numbers, few differences in soil ecology, and no differences in gene-activity in organic and conventional farming systems. Altogether, our results suggest that organic farming has the potential to increase plants' resistance to herbivores, possibly facilitating reduced need for insecticide applications. These benefits appear to be mediated by plant variety and/or farming context.

Weed seed biocontrol by omnivorous mice and insects can limit weed seedbanks, but this ecosystem service can be difficult to predict given the broad diet breadth of seed predators and their potential for intraguild predation. Seed foraging behavior is further modified by fluctuating cues of predation risk from higher trophic levels and the availability of refuge habitat. Uncertainty about whether co-occurring insects and mice additively contribute to weed biocontrol or interfere with each other via intraguild predation limits our ability to recommend habitat management strategies that reliably promote seed destruction. Using seed removal assays, fluorescent powder tracking, and stable isotope analyses, we assessed effects of a predation risk cue (moonlight) on mouse foraging patterns in a patchwork of vegetated and exposed plots in a cultivated field. Mouse foraging activity decreased on exposed ground during the full moon, compared to dark nights, yet foraging movements were unaffected by moon cycle within refuge patches. Weed seed consumption was more than three times higher in cover than exposed soil, and 78% of that difference was attributable to invertebrate granivores. Mice and invertebrate granivores both exhibited higher foraging activity in cover, indicating co-occurrence of intraguild predators and prey. However, stable isotope analyses of fecal samples revealed that mice captured in refuge habitats fed at slightly lower trophic levels than those in exposed habitats (suggesting minimal intraguild predation in refuge habitat), and mouse diet was unaffected by moonlight. Despite increased availability of invertebrate prey in cover patches, mice do not appear to preferentially exploit prey when avoiding their own predators or interfere with weed seed predation. Therefore, functional redundancy of mice and invertebrate seed predators in cover crops and other refuge habitats may strengthen and stabilize weed seed biocontrol.

Background Objectives Animals Materials and Methods Results Conclusions and Clinical Relevance Epicutaneously house dust mite‐sensitised (HDM‐S) healthy dogs are commonly used as canine atopic dermatitis (cAD) models; however, the exact mechanisms of HDM‐induced AD immune activation in HDM‐S and HDM‐nonsensitised (NS) dogs remain unclear.To characterise the inflammatory and pruritogenic transcriptome of acute epicutaneous HDM‐induced skin lesions at 6 h and 24 h in HDM‐NS and HDM‐S dogs; untreated skin at 0 h from each dog served as control.Six HDM‐S and six HDM‐NS laboratory beagles.Processed expression data from GEO deposited by Schamber et al. (G3 (Bethesda), 2014, 4 and 1787) (GSE58442) were downloaded and analysed using R and the Bioconductor package. Significance analysis was performed with the limma package; genes with false discovery rate <0.05 and fold‐change ≤/≥1.5 were considered significantly differentially expressed (DEGs).A 2D principal component analysis revealed no clear separation between HDM‐NS and HDM‐S dogs at 6 h and 24 h time points. HDM‐induced skin lesions in sensitised and nonsensitised dogs at the 24 h time point showed significant upregulation of T helper cell (Th)2 genes (interleukin [IL]‐4R, IL‐5, IL‐13, CCL13 and CCL17), as well as proinflammatory‐ (LTB, IL‐1A and IL‐18), Th1‐ (CXCL10, OASL and MX‐1) and Th17‐related markers (IL‐17B, IL‐17F, CCL19 and CCL20). The key Th22‐related maker, IL‐22, was upregulated only in the HDM‐S group at the 24 h time point. Both groups at 24 h featured significant upregulation of several noncytokine pruritogens, such as trypsin, chymase, cathepsin S, periostin and neuromedin B.Taken together, we establish that epicutaneous HDM patch application induces immune changes in HDM‐NS dogs with Th2 dominance and activates several itch‐promoting pathways. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cover crops are multifunctional tools that mitigate environmental impacts of agriculture, enhance resilience to weather extremes and suppress weeds and arthropod pests. Cover crops provide non‐crop food and habitat resources that attract natural enemies of pests, but their outcomes for pest management are less clear in regions where keystone mutualisms between red imported fire ants and aphids dominate. Here, we manipulate ant exclusion treatments and cover crop treatments (living mulches and terminated cover crops) that vary in food/habitat resources and examine responses of ants, aphids, other herbivores and predators in a cotton agroecosystem. Living mulches reduced both ants and aphids in the crop canopy by 97% and 93%, respectively, relative to bare soil treatments, and terminated cover crops reduced them as well by a lesser degree (~50%). Non‐aphid herbivores occurred in low densities system‐wide and increased in living mulches, whilst native predators had variable responses to cover crops and ant exclusion. Cover crops had no effect on prey removal in the crop canopy, but living mulches tripled rates of weed seed biocontrol, relative to bare soils. Cover crops elicited a shift in fire ant foraging from cotton foliage downward to the soil‐surface, preventing competitive exclusion by keystone ant/aphid mutualists that dominate crop monocultures. Cover crops altered the system‐wide impacts of fire ants: reducing ecosystem disservices (i.e. aphid tending) and enhancing ecosystem services (i.e. weed seed biocontrol). These results provide incentives for cover crop adoption as a regenerative practice in large‐scale commercial agriculture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Herbivorous insects generally choose host plants that optimize their growth. However, many specialists choose chemically defended host plants that slow their growth, prioritizing protection from natural enemies.Invasive specialist herbivores may have an added advantage in their non‐native range where they lack co‐evolved specialist natural enemies, in addition to being unpalatable to generalist predators.Here, we explore the diet preferences of the invasive yellowmargined leaf beetle, Microtheca ochroloma and those of native natural enemies. We measured M. ochroloma preferences among six Brassica cultivars varying in glucosinolate concentrations.In both field and laboratory experiments, M. ochroloma preferred the relatively less defended host plants, mizuna and Chinese cabbage. M. ochroloma grew quickest on mizuna.Generalist predators also preferred to eat M. ochroloma larvae that had been fed mizuna in choice trials, yet in the field, predatory insects were least commonly found on mizuna, and most commonly found on plants dominated by native herbivores.M. ochroloma consumes plants that increase their susceptibility to predators, but predation pressure in the field appears to be generally low. Our results suggest that invasive specialist herbivores may prioritize growth over protection against natural enemies.Weak top‐down regulation of specialist herbivore invaders might enable them to exploit less‐defended host plants in their novel range that facilitate faster growth and exacerbate crop damage. Invasive pests may be more effectively managed by leveraging plant preferences in the novel host range in trap crop systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Veterinary Dermatology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Increasing plant diversity in agroecosystems is well‐known to strengthen natural pest suppression, yet reliably predicting which non‐crop management practices best support natural enemies remains a challenge. Farmers often supplement diversity with managed flower patches or by allowing weedy non‐crop plant growth, both of which may support diverse, abundant and balanced communities of insect predators that provide biocontrol.At the same time, evenness among predators and effectiveness of biocontrol may be compromised by dominant arthropod invaders that co‐benefit from non‐crop diversity.We examined whether floral resources or adjacent weeds had stronger effects on the evenness and abundance of natural enemies by surveying plants and insects on zucchini crops at 37 organic farms.Neither flower richness nor weed richness affected insect predator evenness. Instead, the abundance of an invasive predator, the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta Buren), increased with floral resource diversity, which negatively predicted the evenness and abundance of non‐invasive predators.These results suggest that floral diversity might be a less reliable predictor of natural enemy diversity when invasive predators interfere. Habitat management recommendations for bolstering biocontrol services should consider and potentially mitigate unintended consequences of floral resource provisions on farms where invasive predators dominate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Plants deploy a variety of chemical and physical defenses to protect themselves against herbivores and pathogens. Organic farming seeks to enhance these responses by improving soil quality, ultimately altering bottom up regulation of plant defenses. While laboratory studies suggest this approach is effective, it remains unclear whether organic agriculture encourages more-active plant defenses under real-world conditions. Working on the farms of cooperating growers, we examined gene expression in the leaves of two potato (Solanum tuberosum) varieties, grown on organic vs. conventional farms. For one variety, Norkotah, we found significantly heightened initiation of genes associated with plant-defense pathways in plants grown in organic vs. conventional fields. Organic Norkotah fields exhibited lower levels of nitrate in soil and of nitrogen in plant foliage, alongside differences in communities of soil bacteria, suggesting possible links between soil management and observed differences in plant defenses. Additionally, numbers of predatory and phloem-feeding insects were higher in organic than conventional fields. A second potato variety, Alturas, which is generally grown using fewer inputs and in poorer-quality soils, exhibited lower overall herbivore and predator numbers, few differences in soil ecology, and no differences in gene-activity in organic and conventional farming systems. Altogether, our results suggest that organic farming has the potential to increase plants' resistance to herbivores, possibly facilitating reduced need for insecticide applications. These benefits appear to be mediated by plant variety and/or farming context.

Diet composition modulates animals' ability to resist parasites and recover from stress. Broader diet breadths enable omnivores to mount dynamic responses to parasite attack, but little is known about how plant/prey mixing might influence responses to infection.Using omnivorous deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) as a model, we examine how varying plant and prey concentrations in blended diets influence resistance and body condition following infestation by Rocky Mountain wood ticks (Dermacentor andersoni).In two repeated experiments, deer mice fed for 4 weeks on controlled diets that varied in proportions of seeds and insects were then challenged with 50 tick larvae in two sequential infestations.The numbers of ticks successfully feeding on mice declined by 25% and 66% after the first infestation (in the first and second experiments, respectively), reflecting a pattern of acquired resistance, and resistance was strongest when plant/prey ratios were more equally balanced in mouse diets, relative to seed‐dominated diets.Diet also dramatically impacted the capacity of mice to cope with tick infestations. Mice fed insect‐rich diets lost 15% of their body weight when parasitized by ticks, while mice fed seed‐rich diets lost no weight at all.While mounting/maintaining an immune response may be energetically demanding, mice may compensate for parasitism with fat and carbohydrate‐rich diets.Altogether, these results suggest that a diverse nutritional landscape may be key in enabling omnivores' resistance and resilience to infection and immune stressors in their environments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]