Search

Supplemental digital content is available in the text., BACKGROUND Timely and safe distribution of quality blood products is a major challenge faced by blood banks around the world. Our primary objective was to determine if simulated blood product delivery to an urban trauma center would be more rapidly achieved by unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) than by ground transportation. A secondary objective was to determine the feasibility of maintaining simulated blood product temperatures within a targeted range. METHODS In this prospective pilot study, we used two distinct methods to compare UAV flight duration and ground transport times. Simulated blood products included packed red blood cells, platelet concentrate, and fresh frozen plasma. For each blood product type, three UAV flights were conducted. Temperature was monitored during transport using a probe coupled to a data logger inside each simulated blood product unit. RESULTS All flights were conducted successfully without any adverse events or safety concerns reported. The heaviest payload transported was 6.4 kg, and the drone speed throughout all nine flights was 10 m/s. The mean UAV transportation time was significantly faster than ground delivery (17:06 ± 00:04 minutes vs. 28:54 ± 01:12 minutes, p < 0.0001). The mean ± SD initial temperature for packed red blood cells was 4.4°C ± 0.1°C with a maximum 5% mean temperature variability from departure to landing. For platelet concentrates, the mean ± SD initial temperature was 21.6°C ± 0.5°C, and the maximum variability observed was 0.3%. The mean ± SD initial fresh frozen plasma temperature was −19°C ± 2°C, and the greatest temperature variability was from −17°C ± 2°C to −16°C ± 2°C. CONCLUSIONS Unmanned aerial vehicle transportation of simulated blood products was significantly faster than ground delivery. Simulated blood product temperatures remained within their respective acceptable ranges throughout transport. Further studies assessing UAV transport of real blood products in populated areas are warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/care management, level IV.

Objective Transfusion of blood and blood components is a special type of tissue transplantation, a life-saving treatment. However, besides the benefits of blood product transfusions, there are also some undesirable side effects. In the present study, the frequency and type of transfusion reactions related to blood and blood components were investigated. Methods In this retrospective study, types and the time of occurrence of acute transfusion reaction (ATR), the types of blood and blood components used in our hospital between January 2018 and January 2020 were evaluated for hemovigilance using unit blood products application and side effect reporting forms. Results During the 2-year period, 61,636 blood and/or blood components were used in 9334 patients, and 53 of the transfused patients developed ATR. In two patients, ATR developed 2 times and a total of 55 ATR developed. Of the patients who developed ATR, 18 were female and 35 were male, and their ages ranged from 1 month to 85 years. The frequency of ATR was 0.09%, and 47.3% of ATRs were allergic transfusion reactions, 41.8% were febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTRs), 7.3% were hypotensive transfusion reactions, and 1.8% were transfusion-related lung injury. Fifty-five ATRs were found to be associated with 61.8% erythrocyte suspension, 30.9% with FFP, 5.5% with platelet suspension, and 1.8% with whole blood. Conclusion There are a limited number of studies evaluating transfusion reaction frequency and reaction types from our country. The most frequent ATR reported in our hospital were mild allergic reactions and FNHTR. The most common side effect of blood product type was erythrocyte suspension. It is important to monitor the transfused patients for undesired reactions during and after the transfusion to determine the frequency, type, risk factors, and safety precautions of the transfusion reactions.

Objectives To assess a multimodal physician-to-physician communication initiative that is low in cost and impact to daily workflow to reduce blood product wastage. Background Blood product stewardship is an important issue in all hospital systems. Previous studies have proposed low-cost interventions to reduce blood product wastage, but few have evaluated improvements in communication between the blood bank and providers. We undertook a prospective quality improvement project focusing on improving communication to reduce blood product wastage. Methods We conducted a prospective quality improvement project over the first quarter of 2017, identifying patients with issued but unused blood products. Each service overseeing the care of patients identified on the unit status report was contacted through two possible methods: (i) phone or (ii) proprietary Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 compliant digital messaging application. Collected variables included reserved blood product type and participant time spent. Outcomes included the rate of blood product release and changes in wastage compared with historical data tracked by the blood bank. Results Eight hundred and forty products were reserved during the study period, of which 436 (52%) were released. Average participant times ranged from 2 ± 1 min to 15 ± 4 min with no significant differences in time spent between participants (P = 0·194). Compared with the average product wastage 10 months prior to project initiation, there were significant reductions in the average wastage for platelets (5·3 ± 2·5 units vs 2·5 ± 1·5 units, P = 0·05), RBCs (6·1 ± 3·7 units vs 0 ± 0 units, P = 0·01) and overall wastage (58·3 ± 14·9 units vs 40 ± 15·7 units, P = 0·05). Conclusion Efforts focusing on improving provider-to-provider communication can reduce blood product wastage.

Background Transfusion recipient data are needed for correct estimation of cost-effectiveness in terms of recipient outcomes after transfusion. Also, such data are essential for monitoring blood use, estimation of future blood use and benchmarking. Study Design and Methods A sample of 20 of 93 Dutch hospitals was selected. Datasets containing all blood product transfusions between 1996 and 2006 were extracted from hospital blood bank computer systems, containing transfusion date, blood product type and recipient characteristics such as gender, address, date of birth. The datasets were appended and matched to national hospitalization datasets including primary discharge diagnoses (ICD-9). Using these data, we estimated distributions of blood recipient characteristics in the Netherlands. Results The dataset contains information on 290 043 patients who received 2 405 012 blood products (1 720 075 RBC, 443 697 FFP, 241 240 PLT) from 1996 to 2006. This is 28% of total blood use in the Netherlands during this period. Comparable diagnosis and age distributions of all hospitalizations indicate included hospitals to be representative, per hospital category, for the Netherlands. Of all red blood cells (RBC), fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) and platelets (PLT), respectively 1·7%, 2·5% and 4·5% were transfused to neonates. Recipients of 65 years or older received 57·6% of RBC, 41·4% of FFP and 29·0% of PLT. Most of the blood products were transfused to patients with diseases of the circulary system (25·1%) or neoplasms (22·0%). Conclusion Transfusion data from a limited sample of hospitals can be used to estimate national distributions of blood recipient characteristics.