Search

Background: Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) is indicated for vitamin K antagonist (VKA) reversal but is associated with thrombotic events (TE). In 2018, the institution revised 4F-PCC dosing for VKA reversal from INR and weight-based dosing to a fixed-dose of 1500 units. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare hemostatic efficacy and TE rate of fixed-dose 4PCC to weight-based dosing. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center, quasi-experimental study of adult patients who received 4F-PCC for VKA reversal from January 2014 through May 2016 (INR and weight-based dosing) or April through October 2018 (fixed-dosing). The primary endpoint was hemostatic efficacy, defined by achieving an INR of ≤1.4, or an INR of ≤1.7 with evidence of hemostasis. The key secondary endpoint was TE within 14 days of 4F-PCC administration. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-squared for nominal data and Mann-Whitney U for ordinal and continuous data. Results: The study included 163 patients who received weight-based dosing and 45 who received fixed-dose 4F-PCC. Hemostatic efficacy was 76.9% of patients in the weight-based group and 77.4% of patients in the fixed-dose group ( P = .229). TE occurred in 13.5% of the weight-based vs 6.7% of the fixed-dose group ( P = .181). Conclusion: This study found no difference in hemostatic efficacy with fixed-dose 4F-PCC for VKA reversal compared to INR and weight-based dosing. The occurrence of TE was reduced by 50% with the 4F-PCC fixed-dose strategy; however, this difference was not statistically significant. Further randomized studies are needed to confirm these results., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting IinterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Andexanet alfa (AA) is the only FDA-approved reversal agent for apixaban and rivaroxaban (DOAC). There are no studies comparing its efficacy with four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC). This study aimed to compare PCC to AA for DOAC reversal, hypothesizing noninferiority of PCC., Methods: We performed a retrospective, noninferiority multicenter study of adult patients admitted from July 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019, who had taken a DOAC within 12 hours of injury, were transfused red blood cells (RBCs) or had traumatic brain injury, and received AA or PCC. Primary outcome was PRBC unit transfusion. Secondary outcome with intensive care unit length of stay. MICE imputation was used to account for missing data and zero-inflated Poisson regression was used to account for an excess of zero units of RBC transfused. Two units difference in RBC transfusion was selected as noninferior., Results: Results: From 263 patients at 10 centers, 77 (29%) received PCC and 186 (71%) AA. Patients had similar transfusion rates across reversal treatment groups (23.7% AA vs. 19.5% PCC) with median transfusion in both groups of 0 RBC. According to the Poisson component, PCC increases the amount of RBC transfusion by 1.02 times (95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.33) compared with AA after adjusting for other covariates. The average amount of RBC transfusion (nonzero group) is 6.13. Multiplying this number by the estimated rate ratio, PCC is estimated to have an increase RBC transfusion by 0.123 (95% confidence interval, 0.53-2.02) units compared with AA., Conclusion: PCC appears noninferior to AA for reversal of DOACs for RBC transfusion in traumatically injured patients. Additional prospective, randomized trials are necessary to compare PCC and AA for the treatment of hemorrhage in injured patients on DOACs., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) and prothrombin concentrate complex (PCC) are used for uncontrolled bleeding in cardiac surgery (CS), however, there are limited direct comparisons of these agents. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rFVIIa and PCC in CS related bleeding. Methods: This retrospective study included adult CS patients who received either low dose rFVIIa ( < 30 mcg/kg) or 4-factor PCC. The primary outcome was transfusion requirements of packed red blood cells (pRBC) within 6 hours of factor administration. Secondary efficacy outcomes included transfusion requirements 0-18 hours, doses of additional factor product, thrombotic events, and acute kidney injury (AKI). Results: A total of 179 patients were included (n = 78 rFVIIa; n = 101 PCC). Of patients who received blood products, there was no difference in the requirement of pRBCs within 6 hours (73.8 vs 68.9%, P = .5359) or in the median amount of pRBC transfused (500 mL vs 640 mL, P = .0723) in the rFVIIa and PCC groups respectively. Patients in the PCC group were more likely to require additional factor products (24.4% vs 47.5%, P = .0015), develop AKI (12.8% vs 25.7%, P = .0325), have longer ICU lengths of stay [2 (IQR 1-5) vs 4 (IQR 2-6), P = .0487] and greater in-hospital mortality (2.6% vs 10.9%, P = .033). There was no difference in thrombotic events. Conclusion: Although, there was no difference in pRBC transfusion requirements between PCC and rFVIIa, more patients in the PCC group required additional factor products and had increased adverse effects. Further comparisons of PCC and rFVIIa are warranted., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: It is uncertain whether prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) improves hemostasis in patients on treatment with oral factor Xa-inhibitors (XaI) who require emergency surgery., Objectives: To evaluate whether, in patients with therapeutic levels of oral XaI, preoperative PCC prevents excessive bleeding during and after emergency surgery and is not associated with thrombotic complications., Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study wherein a fixed 2000 IU dose of 4-factor PCC was given to patients taking oral XaI with plasma XaI levels of at least 75 ng/mL before the emergency surgery with an expected blood loss of at least 50 mL. Patients were followed for 30 days. The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of normal or mildly abnormal surgical hemostasis, as assessed by the surgeon; primary safety outcome was the incidence of thromboembolic events within 7 days., Results: We included 20 patients, of which 50% were female, on apixaban (75%) or rivaroxaban (25%) with median XaI level of 128 ng/mL (range, 77-497 ng/mL). The median duration of surgery was 2 hours 42 minutes (range, 15 minutes to 8 hours 17 minutes). Normal or mildly abnormal hemostasis was observed in 16 patients (80%); 2 patients had moderately abnormal and 2 had severely abnormal hemostasis, 1 each of those was considered due to local or technical factors. There were 4 deaths (20%) secondary to underlying disease and 1 incidental pulmonary embolism in a patient with cancer., Conclusion: A fixed dose of PCC appears to control hemostasis in patients with therapeutic plasma levels of apixaban or rivaroxaban requiring emergency surgery., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests S.S. served on data safety monitoring boards for Alexion, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Regeneron, and Sanofi; served on a steering committee for Octapharma; served on event adjudication for Daiichi Sankyo and Takeda. V.B. received honorarium from Bayer. F.G.’s institution received research funding from Novo Nordisk, Roche, Takeda, Bayer, Pfizer, BioMarin, and CSL. R.I. received honoraria for advisory boards for Aspen, LeoPharma, Sanofi, and Inari. P.L.G. is named on a patent, “Novel methods to measure protease inhibitors.” N.C., A.I., S.M., and J.I.W. have no relevant conflicts., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Pediatric cardiac surgery patients are predisposed to blood loss. Blood product administration can lead to complications. Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) offer potential advantages of factor composition, small volume, decreased immunogenicity/infectious risks, and accessibility. The objective of this study was to describe dosing, monitoring, blood product utilization, and thromboembolic complications of administering four-factor PCC (4F-PCC) in pediatric cardiac surgery. We performed a retrospective review of patients aged <18 years undergoing cardiac surgery from June 2020 to May 2022 (inclusive) who received 4F-PCC. Outcomes of interest included 4F-PCC dosing (units/kg) and number of doses administered, chest tube output, blood product administration, donor exposure, length of stay, and thromboembolic events. Eighty-six patients met eligibility criteria. The median (range) age and weight were 0.37 (0.01-16.3) years and 5.3 (1.6-98) kg, respectively. Median (range) total 4F-PCC dose per patient was 25 (9.2-50) units/kg, with 6 patients (7%) receiving a total of two doses. Median (range) 24-hour postoperative packed red blood cells, platelet, plasma, and cryoprecipitate administration volumes were 0 (0-2.57) mL/kg/24 h, 0 (0-1.09), 0 (0-2.64), and 0 (0-0.28 mL/kg/24 h), respectively. Median (range) length of stay and 24-hour postoperative chest tube output were 10 (6-26) days and 1.1 (0.1-4.2) mL/kg/h, respectively. Two (2%) patients experienced a thromboembolic event within 30 days of 4F-PCC administration. These retrospective findings suggest no worsening of hemostatic parameters, a mild median improvement in fibrinogen, low blood product utilization, and low thromboembolism rates following 4F-PCC use in pediatric cardiac surgery., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) require interruption of warfarin for invasive procedures, but parenteral bridging is associated with many complications. Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) can temporarily restore hemostasis in patients undergoing anticoagulation with warfarin., Objectives: This pilot study evaluated the strategy of using variable-dose 4F-PCC to immediately and temporarily reverse warfarin before invasive procedures without holding warfarin in patients with LVADs. The duration of effect of 4F-PCC on factor levels and time to reestablish therapeutic anticoagulation post procedure were assessed., Methods: Adult patients with LVADs and planned invasive procedures were enrolled from a single center. Warfarin was continued uninterrupted. The 4F-PCC dose administered immediately pre-procedure was based on study protocol. International normalized ratio (INR)- and vitamin K-dependent factor levels were collected before and during the 48 hours after 4F-PCC administration. The use of parenteral bridging, International Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) and thromboembolic events at 7 and 30 days were collected., Results: In 21 episodes of 4F-PCC reversal, median baseline INR was 2.7 (IQR 2.2-3.2). The median dosage of 4F-PCC administered was 1794 units (IQR 1536-2130). At 24 and 48 hours post 4F-PCC administration, median INRs were 1.8 (IQR 1.7-2.0) and 2.0 (IQR 1.9-2.4). Two patients required postoperative bridging. One patient experienced major bleeding within 72 hours, and 2 experienced CRNMB within 30 days. There were no thromboembolic events. Baseline and post 4F-PCC vitamin K-dependent factor levels corresponded with changes in INR values. The median time to achieve therapeutic INR post-procedure was 2.5 days (IQR, 1-4)., Conclusion: Administration of 4F-PCC for temporary reversal of warfarin for invasive procedures in patients with LVADs allowed for continued warfarin dosing with minimal use of post-intervention bridging, limited bleeding and no thromboembolic events., Competing Interests: Disclosures JMC is a consultant for Abbott, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Pfizer and served on a scientific advisory board for Anthos, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Sanofi, Werfen. MM reports payments made to Brigham and Women's Hospital from Abbott for consulting, consulting fees from Broadview Ventures, Natera, Paragonix, Moderna, and Baim Institute for Clinical Research; he is a scientific advisory board member for NuPulseCV, Leviticus, Transmedics, and FineHeart. MMG, ASW, SS, AEJ, KS, LC, BR have no conflicts to disclose., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (AATS/ISHLT) guidelines recommend warfarin in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) to reduce the risk of device thrombosis and systemic embolization. Left ventricular assist device patients often undergo elective and emergent procedures that require interrupted anticoagulation. Data and experience vary on the optimal strategy to rapidly reverse warfarin in LVAD patients when an emergent procedure is planned., Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the use of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC4) for warfarin reversal in patients with LVADs undergoing elective and emergent procedures., Methods: This retrospective, single-center, cohort review describes the use of PCC4 in patients with LVADs who require warfarin reversal for elective or emergent procedures. The primary outcome was a composite incidence of pump thrombosis, venous thromboembolism, and ischemic stroke within 30 days of PCC4 administration., Results: In total, 14 patients received 17 administrations of PCC4. One patient received 3 administrations, and 1 other patient received 2 administrations during separate encounters. The median dose was 500 units or 6.6 units/kg (range = 4.2-14.1 units/kg). Of the PCC4 administrations, 82% (14/17) were for low bleed risk procedures and 76% (13/17) were for elective procedures. There were no cases of pump thrombosis, venous thromboembolism, or stroke within 30 days of the procedure., Conclusions and Relevance: Low-dose PCC4 appears to be a safe and effective temporary reversal strategy for patients with LVADs undergoing low-bleed risk elective procedures., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Importance: Millions of people take vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Some people who need urgent surgical procedures require rapid VKA reversal to prevent excessive intraoperative bleeding., Objective: To evaluate the hemostatic noninferiority of an investigational 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) to a control 4F-PCC for rapid VKA reversal before urgent surgery., Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 3, double-blind, noninferiority randomized clinical trial (LEX-209) was conducted in 24 hospitals in the US, Russia, Georgia, Belarus, Ukraine, and Romania from June 7, 2017, through November 8, 2021; the study was stopped in February 2022. Participants were adult patients taking VKA who had an international normalized ratio (INR) of 2 or higher and needed urgent surgery with a substantial bleeding risk (≥50 mL). Patients were randomized 1:1 to a single infusion of either the investigational 4F-PCC or the control 4F-PCC. Data analysis followed intention-to-treat and per-protocol approaches., Interventions: Single intravenous infusion was dosed by body weight and baseline INR. A dose of 25, 35, or 50 IU/kg of investigational 4F-PCC or control 4F-PCC was administered for baseline INR of 2 to less than 4, 4 to 6, or over 6, respectively., Main Outcome and Measure: The primary end point was hemostatic efficacy at surgery end. An independent adjudication board, blinded to the 4F-PCC treatment allocation, assessed hemostatic efficacy using an objective 4-point scale., Results: A total of 208 patients (median [range] age, 67.5 [31-92] years; 118 males [56.7%]) received the investigational (n = 105) or the control (n = 103) 4F-PCC. The median (range) dose was 25 (16-50) IU/kg in the investigational group and 25 (15-50) IU/kg in the control group, with a median (range) infusion time of 12 (8-50) minutes and 13 (7-30) minutes and a median (range) time from infusion to surgery start of 1.42 (0.25-15.25) hours and 1.50 (0.42-18.50) hours, respectively. Baseline median (range) INR was 3.05 (1.97-21.10) in the investigational group and 3.00 (2.00-11.30) in the control group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the investigational 4F-PCC was noninferior to the control 4F-PCC, resulting in effective hemostasis in 94.3% of patients vs 94.2% of patients (proportion difference, 0.001; 95% CI, -0.080 to 0.082; P < .001), meeting the prespecified noninferiority margin of 0.15. An INR of 1.5 or lower at 30 minutes after infusion occurred in 78.1% of patients in the investigational group vs 71.8% of patients in the control group (proportion difference, 0.063; 95% CI, -0.056 to 0.181). Thrombotic events (2.9% vs 0%, respectively) and mortality (4.8% vs 1.0%, respectively) were no different than expected for 4F-PCC use. One patient in each treatment group discontinued due to adverse events (cardiac disorders unrelated to 4F-PCC)., Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that the investigational 4F-PCC was hemostatically noninferior to the control 4F-PCC for rapid VKA reversal in patients needing urgent surgery with considerable bleeding risk; the safety profile of these two 4F-PCCs was similar. These results support the investigational 4F-PCC as a therapeutic option for surgical patients requiring rapid VKA reversal., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02740335.

Background: Optimal reversal agent for direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-associated major bleeding has not been described. Before the approval of andexanet alfa (AA) in 2018, 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) was recommended by major guidelines. Currently, AA is recommended as the first-line agent by most guidelines. With a paucity of literature comparing the 2 agents, there is clinical value in assessing hemostatic efficacy and safety of the 2 agents., Objective: This study aimed to evaluate hemostatic efficacy and safety of AA and 4F-PCC in all DOAC-associated major bleedings., Methods: A multicenter, retrospective chart review was performed of adult subjects who were admitted for a DOAC-associated major bleeding and received 4F-PCC from February 2018 to May 2019 or AA from May 2019 to September 2021. Some of the exclusion criteria included not receiving a DOAC, receiving multiple reversal agents during the same hospitalization, receiving reversal for any nonmajor bleeding indication, and not receiving the full dose of a reversal agent. The primary outcome was hemostatic efficacy 24 hours after the end of the reversal agent administration. Secondary outcomes included time to administration, hospital mortality, length of stay, need for surgery, and need for additional blood product. Safety outcome was incidence of thrombotic events., Results: There were 99 subjects included in the 4F-PCC group and 84 subjects in the AA group. Hemostatic efficacy was achieved in 69 subjects (69.7%) in the 4F-PCC group and 63 subjects (75%) in the AA group (P = 0.927). In-hospital mortality was seen in 20 subjects (20.2%) in the 4F-PCC group and 10 subjects (11.9%) in the AA group. Thrombotic events were seen in 7 subjects (7.1%) in the 4F-PCC group and 6 subjects (7.1%) in the AA group., Conclusions: There were no significant differences in hemostatic efficacy, in-hospital mortality, and number of thrombotic events between 4F-PCC and AA., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors declare no relevant conflicts of interest or financial relationships., (Copyright © 2023 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Non-activated four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4 F-PCC) has emerged as the preferred reversal strategy for patients on warfarin with life-threatening bleeding. Current dosing recommendations for 4 F-PCC require pre-treatment international normalized ratio (INR) and bodyweight values, resulting in ordering and administration delays. Studies have shown that alternative dosing regimens are safe and efficacious. This retrospective, single-center, pre- and post-protocol analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of a pharmacist driven modified fixed-dose 4 F-PCC regimen versus package insert weight- and INR-based dosing regimen for warfarin reversal. The primary outcome was achievement of INR less than two. Secondary outcomes included dose and cost of 4 F-PCC, a time analysis, incidence of concomitant vitamin K administration, and incidence of thrombosis within seven days of 4 F-PCC. There were 195 patients included in the analysis, with 74 in the pre-cohort and 121 in the post-cohort. Baseline characteristics were similar between cohorts with the most common indication for warfarin use being atrial fibrillation (48.6% versus 47.1%) and reversal being intracerebral hemorrhage (68.9% versus 43.0%). Achievement of the primary endpoint occurred in 92% versus 95% (p = 0.097) of patients. A statistically significant difference was seen between cohorts regarding median dose and cost of 4 F-PCC administered (p < 0.001). Eleven thromboembolic events occurred with three events in the pre-cohort and eight events in the post-cohort (p = 0.453). A fixed-dose of 1500IU of 4 F-PCC was effective in reversing INR to less than two in most patients regardless of reversal indication with minimal thrombotic risks., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Abstract: Fitusiran, a subcutaneous investigational small interfering RNA therapeutic, targets antithrombin to rebalance hemostasis in people with hemophilia A or B (PwHA/B), irrespective of inhibitor status. This phase 3, open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of fitusiran prophylaxis in males aged ≥12 years with hemophilia A or B, with or without inhibitors, who received prior bypassing agent (BPA)/clotting factor concentrate (CFC) prophylaxis. Participants continued their prior BPA/CFC prophylaxis for 6 months before switching to once-monthly 80 mg fitusiran prophylaxis for 7 months (onset and efficacy periods). Primary end point was annualized bleeding rate (ABR) in the BPA/CFC prophylaxis and fitusiran efficacy period. Secondary end points included spontaneous ABR (AsBR) and joint ABR (AjBR). Safety and tolerability were assessed. Of 80 enrolled participants, 65 (inhibitor, n = 19; noninhibitor, n = 46) were eligible for ABR analyses. Observed median ABRs were 6.5 (interquartile range [IQR], 2.2-19.6)/4.4 (IQR, 2.2-8.7) with BPA/CFC prophylaxis vs 0.0 (IQR, 0.0-0.0)/0.0 (IQR, 0.0-2.7) in the corresponding fitusiran efficacy period. Estimated mean ABRs were substantially reduced with fitusiran by 79.7% (P = .0021) and 46.4% (P = .0598) vs BPA/CFC prophylaxis, respectively. Forty-one participants (63.1%) experienced 0 treated bleeds with fitusiran vs 11 (16.9%) with BPAs/CFCs. Median AsBR and AjBR were both 2.2 with BPA/CFC prophylaxis and 0.0 in the fitusiran efficacy period. Two participants (3.0%) experienced suspected or confirmed thromboembolic events with fitusiran. Once-monthly fitusiran prophylaxis significantly reduced bleeding events vs BPA/CFC prophylaxis in PwHA/B, with or without inhibitors, and reported adverse events were generally consistent with previously identified risks of fitusiran. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03549871., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Purpose: The purpose of this review is to evaluate current literature on the treatment of factor Xa inhibitor-associated bleeds with 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC), with a focus on the effect of low versus high dosing of 4F-PCC on hemostatic efficacy and safety outcomes., Summary: A search of PubMed and EBSCOhost was performed to identify studies evaluating patients with a factor Xa inhibitor-bleed treated with 4F-PCC at either low or high doses. Studies of patients receiving alternative reversal agents such as fresh frozen plasma and andexanet alfa or where no comparator group was evaluated were excluded from the analysis. To assess the effect of these 4F-PCC dosing strategies, the primary outcome of interest was hemostatic efficacy. Four studies meeting inclusion criteria were included in this review. In each of the included studies, similar rates of hemostatic efficacy, hospital mortality, and venous thromboembolism were observed in the low- and high-dose cohorts., Conclusion: These results suggest low- and high-dose 4F-PCC may confer similar clinical effectiveness and safety; however, these findings should be evaluated and confirmed with future prospective studies., (© American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 2024. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Warfarin, a widely utilized anticoagulant, is paramount for preventing thromboembolic events in patients with mechanical heart valve replacements. However, its narrow therapeutic index can lead to over-anticoagulation and overdose, resulting in serious health risks. This study examines the efficacy of human prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) in managing warfarin overdose, in comparison with traditional treatments. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 162 adults who presented with warfarin overdose (INR > 5.0) at a tertiary care hospital between 2016 and 2020. Participants were divided into 2 groups-those treated with PCC (n = 57) and those treated with conventional methods (n = 105), including vitamin K and fresh frozen plasma. The primary outcome was the rate of reaching the target (International Normalized Ratio) INR within 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included transfusion requirements, thromboembolic events, adverse reactions, 30-day mortality, and length of hospital stay. PCC demonstrated significant efficacy, with 89.5% of patients achieving the target INR within 24 hours, compared to 64.8% in the control group (P < .05). The PCC group also had reduced transfusion requirements and a shorter average hospital stay. There was no significant difference in thromboembolic events or adverse reactions between the 2 groups, and the reduced 30-day mortality in the PCC group was not statistically significant. Human prothrombin complex concentrate is associated with rapid reaching the target INR, decreased transfusion needs, and shortened hospitalization, making it a promising option for warfarin overdose management. While the results are encouraging, larger, multicenter, randomized controlled trials are necessary to further validate these findings and optimize PCC administration protocols., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Previous meta-analyses assessed andexanet alfa (AA) or prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) products for the treatment of Factor Xa inhibitor (FXaI)-associated major bleeding. However, they did not include recent studies or assess the impact of the risk of bias. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis on the effectiveness of AA versus PCC products for FXaI-associated major bleeding, inclusive of the studies' risk of bias. PubMed and Embase were searched for comparative studies assessing major bleeding in patients using FXaI who received AA or PCC. We used the Methodological Index for NOn-Randomized Studies (MINORS) checklist and one question from the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal of Case Series tool to assess the risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to provide a pooled estimate for the effect of AA versus PCC products on hemostatic efficacy, in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and thrombotic events. Low-moderate risk of bias studies were meta-analyzed separately, as well as combined with high risk of bias studies. Eighteen comparative evaluations of AA versus PCC were identified. Twenty-eight percent of the studies (n = 5) had low-moderate risk and 72% (n = 13) had a high risk of bias. Studies with low-moderate risk of bias suggested improvements in hemostatic efficacy [Odds Ratio (OR) 2.72 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.15-6.44); one study], lower in-hospital mortality [OR 0.48 (95% CI: 0.38-0.61); three studies], and reduced 30-day mortality [OR 0.49 (95% CI: 0.30-0.80); two studies] when AA was used versus PCC products. When studies were included regardless of the risk of bias, pooled effects showed improvements in hemostatic efficacy [OR 1.36 (95% CI: 1.01-1.84); 12 studies] and reductions in 30-day mortality [OR 0.53 (95% CI: 0.37-0.76); six studies] for AA versus PCC. The difference in thrombotic events with AA versus PCC was not statistically significant in the low-moderate, high, or combined risk of bias groups. The evidence from low-moderate quality real-world studies suggests that AA is superior to PCC in enhancing hemostatic efficacy and reducing in-hospital and 30-day mortality. When studies are assessed regardless of the risk of bias, the pooled hemostatic efficacy and 30-day mortality risk remain significantly better with AA versus PCC., (© 2024 The Authors. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.)

Background: Our institution introduced fixed-dose prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) to streamline order verification and medication administration. Previous studies using fixed-dose PCC for vitamin K antagonist reversal showed comparable efficacy to weight-based dosing. Objective: To compare fixed versus weight-based PCC dosing for reversal of Factor Xa Inhibitor (FXaI) effects. Methods: Retrospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary care academic medical center. Patients who received PCC to reverse the effects of apixaban or rivaroxaban were eligible. Subjects in the fixed-dose group (5000 units or 2000 units) were compared to weight-based PCC (50 units/kg). The primary outcome was time between order entry and medication administration. Secondary outcomes included: average PCC dose, postadministration procedures, achieved hemostasis, 30-day mortality, hospital length of stay, and adverse drug events. Results: 72 patients received fixed-dose PCC and 101 received weight-based PCC. Median time between order entry and administration was 4.5 min shorter in the fixed-dose group compared to weight-based (34.5 vs 39 min, P  = .10). In patients who received fixed-dose, 79.2% achieved hemostasis versus 71.3% in the weight-based group (RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.94-1.32). There was no difference in the number of subsequent hemorrhage-related surgeries (29.2% vs 36.7%, RR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.51-1.24) or mortality rate (26.4% vs 35.6%, RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.46-1.17). There were zero adverse drug events reported. Rates of thrombosis were 2.8% and < 1% ( P  = .57) in the fixed and weight-based groups, respectively. Conclusion and Relevance: The fixed-dosing strategy did not reduce time to PCC administration nor impact hemostasis or mortality. These data support that the fixed-dosing method is a viable option., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsOne of the authors, Taylor J Miller, is on the Speakers Bureau for rivaroxaban. All other authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Importance: Optimal transfusion strategies in traumatic hemorrhage are unknown. Reports suggest a beneficial effect of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) on blood product consumption., Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of 4F-PCC administration in patients at risk of massive transfusion., Design, Setting, and Participants: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled superiority trial in 12 French designated level I trauma centers from December 29, 2017, to August 31, 2021, involving consecutive patients with trauma at risk of massive transfusion. Follow-up was completed on August 31, 2021., Interventions: Intravenous administration of 1 mL/kg of 4F-PCC (25 IU of factor IX/kg) vs 1 mL/kg of saline solution (placebo). Patients, investigators, and data analysts were blinded to treatment assignment. All patients received early ratio-based transfusion (packed red blood cells:fresh frozen plasma ratio of 1:1 to 2:1) and were treated according to European traumatic hemorrhage guidelines., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 24-hour all blood product consumption (efficacy); arterial or venous thromboembolic events were a secondary outcome (safety)., Results: Of 4313 patients with the highest trauma level activation, 350 were eligible for emergency inclusion, 327 were randomized, and 324 were analyzed (164 in the 4F-PCC group and 160 in the placebo group). The median (IQR) age of participants was 39 (27-56) years, Injury Severity Score was 36 (26-50 [major trauma]), and admission blood lactate level was 4.6 (2.8-7.4) mmol/L; prehospital arterial systolic blood pressure was less than 90 mm Hg in 179 of 324 patients (59%), 233 patients (73%) were men, and 226 (69%) required expedient hemorrhage control. There was no statistically or clinically significant between-group difference in median (IQR) total 24-hour blood product consumption (12 [5-19] U in the 4F-PCC group vs 11 [6-19] U in the placebo group; absolute difference, 0.2 U [95% CI, -2.99 to 3.33]; P = .72). In the 4F-PCC group, 56 patients (35%) presented with at least 1 thromboembolic event vs 37 patients (24%) in the placebo group (absolute difference, 11% [95% CI, 1%-21%]; relative risk, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.04-2.10]; P = .03)., Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with trauma at risk of massive transfusion, there was no significant reduction of 24-hour blood product consumption after administration of 4F-PCC, but thromboembolic events were more common. These findings do not support systematic use of 4F-PCC in patients at risk of massive transfusion., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03218722.

Purpose: Hemophilia B is a bleeding disorder, caused by a factor IX (FIX) deficiency. Recently, FIX concentrates with extended half-life (EHL) have become available. Prophylactic dosing of EHL-FIX concentrates can be optimized by assessment of individual pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. To determine these parameters, limited sampling strategies (LSSs) may be applied. The study aims to establish adequate LSSs for estimating individual PK parameters of EHL-FIX concentrates using in silico evaluation., Methods: Monte Carlo simulations were performed to obtain FIX activity versus time profiles using published population PK models for N9-GP (Refixia), rFIXFc (Alprolix), and rIX-FP (Idelvion). Fourteen LSSs, containing three or four samples taken within 8 days after administration, were formulated. Bayesian analysis was applied to obtain estimates for clearance (CL), half-life (t 1/2 ), time to 1% (Time 1% ), and calculated weekly dose (Dose 1% ). Bias and precision of these estimates were assessed to determine which LSS was adequate., Results: For all PK parameters of N9-GP, rFIXFc and rIX-FP bias was generally acceptable (range: -5% to 5%). For N9-GP, precision of all parameters for all LSSs was acceptable (< 25%). For rFIXFc, precision was acceptable for CL and Time 1% , except for t 1/2 (range: 27.1% to 44.7%) and Dose 1% (range: 12% to 29.4%). For rIX-FP, all LSSs showed acceptable bias and precision, except for Dose 1% using LSS with the last sample taken on day 3 (LSS 6 and 10)., Conclusion: Best performing LSSs were LSS with samples taken at days 1, 5, 7, and 8 (N9-GP and rFIXFc) and at days 1, 4, 6, and 8 (rIX-FP), respectively., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Study Objective: To determine if a fixed dose of 1000 IU of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) is as effective as traditional variable dosing based on body weight and international normalized ratio (INR) for reversal of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) anticoagulation., Methods: In this open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial, patients with nonintracranial bleeds requiring VKA reversal with 4F-PCC were allocated to either a 1,000-IU fixed dose of 4F-PCC or the variable dose. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with effective hemostasis according to the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis definition. The design was noninferiority with a lower 95% confidence interval of no more than -6%. When estimating sample size, we assumed that fixed dosing would be 4% superior., Results: From October 2015 until January 2020, 199 of 310 intended patients were included before study termination due to decreasing enrollment rates. Of the 199 patients, 159 were allowed in the per-protocol analysis. Effective hemostasis was achieved in 87.3% (n=69 of 79) in fixed compared to 89.9% (n=71 of 79) in the variable dosing cohort (risk difference 2.5%, 95% confidence interval -13.3 to 7.9%, P=.27). Median door-to-needle times were 109 minutes (range 16 to 796) in fixed and 142 (17 to 1076) for the variable dose (P=.027). INR less than 2.0 at 60 minutes after 4F-PCC infusion was reached in 91.2% versus 91.7% (P=1.0)., Conclusion: The large majority of patients had good clinical outcome after 4F-PCC use; however, noninferiority of the fixed dose could not be demonstrated because the design assumed the fixed dose would be 4% superior. Door-to-needle time was shortened with the fixed dose, and INR reduction was similar in both dosing regimens., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4PCC) is the preferred reversal agent for warfarin reversal, although the ideal dose is unknown. Fixed-dose 4PCC offers simplified dosing compared to standard-dosing algorithms with potentially lower risks of thromboembolic complications given lower doses are typically utilized., Methods: Retrospective, observational, multicentered, pre- post- study of patients who received 4PCC for warfarin reversal among four hospitals within the same regional health system. Standard-dose patients received variable doses ranging from 25 to 50 units/kg based on total body weight and initial INR and fixed-dose patients received 2000 units. The primary outcome was achievement of a target INR ≤ 1.4 on the first post-4PCC INR result., Results: After exclusions, 48 and 42 patients were analyzed in the standard-dose and fixed-dose groups, respectively. There was no difference in the ability to achieve a target INR of ≤1.4 (82.6% vs 81.5%, p = 0.14). Both groups received the same median dose of 2000 units, although fixed-dose patients actually received a higher weight-based dose than standard-dose patients (27 units/kg vs 24.5 units/kg)., Conclusion: A fixed-dose 4PCC regimen of 2000 units among patients with ICH was as effective as standard-dose 4PCC for INR reversal among patients with ICH. However, fixed-doses of 2000 units at times exceeded standard 4PCC doses which may be contradictory to the goals of fixed-dose 4PCC for warfarin reversal., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Objective: This study compares the safety and efficacy of a fixed dose of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4FPCC) to the FDA-approved variable dosing for reversal of warfarin-induced anticoagulation., Methods: This was a single-center, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial with subjects randomized to 4FPCC at a fixed dose of 1500 IU or the FDA-approved variable dosing regimen. The primary efficacy outcome (reversal success) was defined as a post-intervention international normalized ratio (INR) of less than or equal to 1.5. Given that 4FPCC is the standard of care for reversal of warfarin-induced anticoagulation an active-controlled approach was employed with the two dosing regimens compared based on efficacy, cost, and safety outcomes., Results: 71 subjects (34 in the fixed dose group and 37 in the variable dose group) completed the study. There were no significant differences in age, gender, weight, initial INR, or indication for 4FPCC administration between the two treatment groups. Reversal success in the fixed-dose group was 61.8%, while in the variable dose group reversal success was 89.2%. Reversal success in the fixed-dose group was significantly lower than the rate of reversal success in the variable dose group (27.4% lower, p = 0.011)., Conclusion: The results of this study provide evidence that fixed dosing results in lower reversal success rates as compared to variable dosing of 4FPCC for warfarin-induced anticoagulation., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest ZS reports no conflicts of interest. BVA reports no conflicts of interest. CW reports no conflicts of interest. KI reports no conflicts of interest. MP reports no conflicts of interest. PR reports no conflicts of interest. EC reports no conflicts of interest. DD reports no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Fixed-dose prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) for the reversal of vitamin K antagonists may decrease the incidence of thromboembolic events, treatment costs, and treatment delays. However, the ideal fixed dose is unknown, with some studies showing inadequate reversal with suboptimal dosing or in patients with a higher international normalized ratio (INR) or weight. This indicates a need for a modified fixed-dose strategy that considers weight and INR. This study was a retrospective chart review comparing efficacy and safety outcomes of the standard variable-dose protocol versus a fixed-dose protocol. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved INR reversal. Of the total of 113 patients reviewed, INR reversal to < 1.5 was achieved in 23 patients (46%) in the variable-dose group versus 27 patients (43%) in the fixed-dose group (P = 0.83). Of the 27 patients with ICH, INR reversal to ≤ 1.3 was achieved in five patients (71%) in the variable dose group versus ten patients (50%) in the fixed-dose group (P = 0.41). The rate of INR reversal did not differ significantly between groups, but the fixed-dose group used less PCCs and had lower treatment costs., (© 2021. Japanese Society of Hematology.)

Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) administration has increased among cardiac surgery patients in recent years; however, use in LVAD implantation/exchange is not widespread due to the fear of thrombotic complications. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing LVAD implantation/exchange with intraoperative PCC administration versus traditional transfusion practices alone. Adult LVAD implants/exchanges at our institution between 2015 and 2018 were included. Patients were categorized as receiving intraoperative PCC or no-PCC (traditional). The primary outcome was the need for allogenic transfusion and transfusion volume at 48 hours after initial intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Secondary outcomes included metrics of morbidity and mortality. A total of 160 patients (39 PCC, 121 traditional) were analyzed. In unadjusted analysis, patients in the PCC group received lower intraoperative transfusion volumes compared to the traditional group although not statistically significant (1464 mL [IQR 796, 4876] vs. 2568 mL [IQR 1292, 3606]; P value .37). In the fully adjusted analysis, patients in the PCC group had increased odds of transfusion within 48 hours of ICU admission (OR 4.06, 95% CI: 1.35-12.20; P < .01); however, there was no significant difference in transfusion volumes (P = .09). Patients receiving PCCs had higher incidence of deep vein thrombosis (10.3% vs. 0%; P  < .01) and 30-day mortality (17.9% vs. 4.1%; P < .01). LVAD pump thrombosis occurred in 2.6% versus 0.8% in the PCC and traditional groups, respectively; P = .98. Patients undergoing LVAD implantation and exchange represent a complex surgical cohort. The results of this study suggest that the intraoperative PCC use during LVAD implant/exchange was associated with reduced intraoperative transfusions. Intraoperative PCC use was, however, associated with higher odds of postoperative transfusion, although transfusion volumes were not significantly different. While the deep vein thrombosis and 30-day mortality rates were higher in the PCC group, these results are likely related to the degree of surgical and patient complexity rather than PCC use itself. Further studies are needed to assess PCC use in this surgical cohort., (© 2021 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objectives: To evaluate the applicability and compliance with guidelines for early initiation of long-term prophylaxis in infants with severe hemophilia A and to identify factors associated with guideline compliance., Study Design: This real-world, prospective, multicenter, population-based FranceCoag study included almost all French boys with severe hemophilia A, born between 2000 and 2009 (ie, after guideline implementation)., Results: We included 333 boys in the study cohort. The cumulative incidence of long-term prophylaxis use was 61.2% at 3 years of age vs 9.5% in a historical cohort of 39 boys born in 1996 (ie, before guideline implementation). The guidelines were not applicable in 23.1% of patients due to an early intracranial bleeding or inhibitor development. Long-term prophylaxis was delayed in 10.8% of patients. In the multivariate analysis, 2 variables were significantly associated with "timely long-term prophylaxis" as compared with "delayed long-term prophylaxis": hemophilia treating center location in the southern regions of France (OR 23.6, 95% CI 1.9-286.7, P = .013 vs Paris area) and older age at long-term prophylaxis indication (OR 7.2 for each additional year, 95% CI 1.2-43.2, P = .031). Long-term prophylaxis anticipation was observed in 39.0% of patients. Earlier birth year (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.8, P = .010 for birth years 2005-2009 vs 2000-2004) and age at first factor replacement (OR 1.9 for each additional year, 95% CI 1.2-3.0, P = .005) were significantly associated with "long-term prophylaxis guideline compliance" vs "long-term prophylaxis anticipation.", Conclusions: This study suggests that long-term prophylaxis guidelines are associated with increased long-term prophylaxis use. However, early initiation of long-term prophylaxis remains a challenge., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The use of whole blood (WB) for the treatment of hemorrhagic shock and coagulopathy is increasing in civilian trauma patients. Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4-PCC) in adjunct to component therapy showed improved outcomes in trauma patients. Our study aims to evaluate the outcomes of trauma patients who received 4-PCC and WB (4-PCC-WB) compared with WB alone., Methods: We performed a 3-year (2015-2017) analysis of the American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program database. All adult (age, ≥18 years) trauma patients who received WB were included. We excluded patients who were on preinjury anticoagulants. Patients were stratified into two groups, 4-PCC-WB versus WB alone, and matched in a 1:2 ratio using propensity score matching. Outcome measures were packed red blood cells, plasma, platelets, and cryoprecipitate transfused, in-hospital complications, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) among survivors, and mortality., Results: A total of 252 patients (4-PCC-WB, 84; WB alone, 168) were matched. The mean ± SD age was 47 ± 21 years, 63% were males, median Injury Severity Score was 30 (21-40), and 87% had blunt injuries. Patients who received 4-PCC-WB had decreased requirement for packed red blood cell (8 U vs. 10 U, p = 0.04) and fresh frozen plasma (6 U vs. 8 U, p = 0.01) transfusion, lower rates of acute kidney injury (p = 0.03), and ICU LOS (5 days vs. 8 days, p = 0.01) compared with WB alone. There was no difference in the platelet transfusion (p = 0.19), cryoprecipitate transfusion (p = 0.37), hospital LOS (p = 0.72), and in-hospital mortality (p = 0.72) between the two groups., Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that the use of 4-PCC as an adjunct to WB is associated with a reduction in transfusion requirements and ICU LOS compared with WB alone in the resuscitation of trauma patients. Further studies are required to evaluate the role of PCC with WB in the resuscitation of trauma patients., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic, level III., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Increased preoperative delay in patients with hip fractures may be responsible for increased morbidity and mortality. We hypothesized that a strategy of reversal of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) by prothrombin complexes concentrates (PCCs), as compared to vitamin K, is safe and reduces preoperative delay and hospital length of stay (LOS)., Methods: In this pilot study, we reviewed the records of patients admitted to a university-affiliated hospital for hip fracture between Jan. 1, 2012, and Dec. 31, 2016, who were taking VKA. Patients were stratified according to reversal strategy (vitamin K v. PCC). Adverse effects, time to surgery, LOS and mortality were collected from the electronic medical record and were compared between the 2 study groups and a control group not treated with VKA., Results: A total of 141 patients were included in the study: 65 in the vitamin K group, 26 in the PCC group and 50 in the control group. The median preoperative delay in the PCC group (20 h [interquartile range (IQR)] 13-25 h]) and the control group (20 h [IQR 15-33 h]) was lower than that in the vitamin K group (45 h [IQR 31-52 h]) (p < 0.001). Patients in the PCC group had a shorter median hospital LOS than those in the vitamin K group (6 d [IQR 4-9 d] v. 8 d [IQR 6-11 d], p < 0.05). No difference was observed in the proportion of patients who received a red blood cell transfusion, or had thrombotic or hemorrhagic complications. No difference in mortality at 12 months was observed between the groups., Conclusion: In patients with hip fracture, the use of PCCs as compared to vitamin K to reverse the effect of VKA significantly reduced preoperative delay and hospital LOS, and was not associated with an increase in the rates of thrombotic or hemorrhagic complications. Prospective studies involving a greater number of patients are required to confirm these promising results., Competing Interests: Jean-Stéphane David has delivered lectures and consulted for LFB Laboratory. No other competing interests were declared., (© 2021 CMA Joule Inc. or its licensors.)

Study Objectives: Current neurocritical care guidelines recommend 50 IU/kg four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4PCC) for factor Xa inhibitor (FXaI) reversal in intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) based on few clinical studies conducted among non-ICH subjects. Two recent studies suggest that low-dose (25 IU/kg) 4PCC may be similar to 50 IU/kg in reversal of FXaI in ICH, and both 25 and 50 IU/kg doses are used in clinical practice for this indication. To our knowledge, no studies have directly compared 25 IU/kg versus 50 IU/kg 4PCC for FXaI reversal in ICH. The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in hemostatic efficacy between 25 IU/kg versus 50 IU/kg 4PCC for FXaI reversal in ICH., Design: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study was performed in five hospitals in central Texas from November 2013 to December 2019., Data Source: Patients were identified with a medication use report of 4PCC and were classified in the low- or standard-dose group based on whether the 25 IU/kg or 50 IU/kg dose was received, respectively., Patients: A total of 93 patients were included (25 IU/kg, n = 62; 50 IU/kg, n = 31)., Measurements and Main Results: There was no difference in hemostatic efficacy between groups (82.3% low dose vs. 83.9% standard dose, p = 0.846). No differences were identified in-hospital mortality, length of stay, thrombotic events, or the need for surgery or additional blood products between groups., Conclusion: For the reversal of FXaI in ICH, a 25 IU/kg dose may be an effective alternative to 50 IU/kg 4PCC dosing., (© 2021 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.)

Introduction: Despite an increase in the use of fixed-dose protocols of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) for the reversal of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), there remains a paucity of data in obese patients. In this study, we aimed to compare the proportion of patients attaining international normalized ratio (INR) goals using a weight-based dosing strategy versus a fixed-dose regimen of 4F-PCC., Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted in patients 18 years of age or older, weighing ≥ 100 kg, who received either a weight-based dose or fixed dose of 4F-PCC (2000 units) for the reversal of VKA, and had a documented baseline and post-treatment INR. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving an INR of < 2 for all indications of warfarin reversal, except in patients with intracranial hemorrhage, where the goal was an INR of < 1.5., Results: A total of 44 patients met the inclusion criteria; 25 patients in the weight-based dosing group and 19 patients in the fixed-dose group. The median baseline INR was similar in both groups (weight-based dosing group 3.2 [interquartile range {IQR} 2.8-3.7] vs fixed-dose group 3.0 [IQR 2.7-4.9], p = 1). The median post-treatment INR was significantly lower in the weight-based dosing group compared to the fixed-dose group (1.3 [IQR 1.2-1.5] vs 1.6 [IQR 1.5-1.9], p < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in the primary outcome between both groups (weight-based dosing strategy 84% vs fixed dose strategy 90%, p = 0.68)., Conclusion: Our findings suggest that a fixed-dose regimen of 2000 units in obese patients weighing ≥ 100 kg is adequate to achieve these INR goals.

Compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), oral factor Xa inhibitors are associated with at least equivalent efficacy and a lower incidence of major bleeding. Despite this benefit, bleeding remains the most common adverse event. Prior to the approval of andexanet alfa, alternative agents such as 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) were utilized for reversal. This was a retrospective, descriptive study conducted on patients 18 years of age or older who received 4F-PCC for reversal of oral factor Xa inhibitors-associated bleeding. Patients were excluded if they received a VKA or dabigatran in the previous 48 hours. A subgroup analysis comparing 4F-PCC with andexanet alfa was conducted on patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the ANNEXA-4 trial. The primary end point of this study was to evaluate the incidence of hemostasis and associated dosing strategies in patients receiving 4F-PCC for reversal of oral factor Xa inhibitors-associated bleeding. Thirty-eight patients were included, and 28 patients (74%) achieved hemostasis. The median dose of 4F-PCC was 50 units/kg. In patients who achieved hemostasis, the median dose was 50 units/kg, and in those who failed to reach hemostasis, a median dose of 30 units/kg was seen. Within the subgroup analysis, there was no difference in overall rates of hemostasis between the 4F-PCC and andexanet alfa groups. Remaining a reasonable option to utilize for reversal of oral factor Xa inhibitors is 4F-PCC, especially when andexanet alfa is unavailable, with 50 units/kg appearing to be the most effective dose to achieve hemostasis. Further studies are needed to determine a preferential agent., (© 2020, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background: Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) exclusion criteria in the landmark four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) trial have not been incorporated into clinical practice and incremental predictive ability is unknown., Objectives: Evaluate the association of meeting at least 1 ICH exclusion criterion with the composite end point in-hospital mortality and modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 5 or 6. Determine the number and combination of criteria associated with poor outcomes., Methods: Retrospective review of adult ICH patients who received 4F-PCC for anticoagulant reversal. Patient demographics, ICH exclusion criteria, in-hospital mortality, disability, and disposition were collected. χ 2 Analysis and logistic regression were used to assess differences between patients with and without ICH exclusion criteria., Results: Data from 167 patients were analyzed: 103 (61.7%) met at least 1 ICH exclusion criterion. The composite end point occurred more in those with at least 1 ICH exclusion criterion (74.8% vs 39%; P < 0.0001). Presence of 2 or more ICH exclusion criteria was associated with higher odds of the composite end point, higher mRS score, and long-term care facility disposition ( P < 0.0001). Glasgow Coma Scale score <7 and at least 1 other ICH exclusion criterion had negative effects on composite end point and mortality: 95% to 100% and 85% to 100%, respectively., Conclusion and Relevance: Patients meeting at least 1 ICH exclusion criterion had greater death/disability compared with those who did not. More ICH exclusion criteria were associated with higher rates of death, disability, and worse disposition. These data may aid in developing optimal 4F-PCC use criteria.

Introduction: Factor Xa (fXa) inhibitor reversal for life-threatening bleeding is controversial due to a lack of high-quality evidence. The purpose of this study was to determine the hemostatic efficacy of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) for the reversal of fXa inhibitors compared to warfarin for life-threatening bleeding., Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study at two academic medical centers between January 1, 2014-December 31, 2019, which included patients who presented to the emergency department with a life-threatening bleed necessitating anticoagulation reversal with 4F-PCC. The primary endpoint was achievement of hemostatic efficacy after 4F-PCC administration., Results: Of the 525 patients who had an order for 4F-PCC during the study period, 148 patients met the criteria for inclusion (n = 48 fXa inhibitor group; n = 100 warfarin group). Apixaban (52.1%) and rivaroxaban (45.8%) were the most commonly used fXa inhibitors. Effective hemostasis was similar between groups (79.2% fXa inhibitor group vs 85% warfarin group, p = 0.38). This was consistent across all types of bleeding. Thrombotic events were rare in both groups (2% vs 3%)., Conclusion: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study demonstrated that using 4F-PCC for treatment of life-threatening bleeding produced effective hemostasis in patients on fXa inhibitors and warfarin.

Aims: This study aims to determine whether door-to-needle times (DNT) for reversal of anticoagulant-associated intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) (1) have improved over time, (2) differ between warfarin and dabigatran and (3) are comparable to ischaemic stroke (IS) thrombolysis DNT, and (4) whether reversal is monitored., Methods: Retrospective review of all warfarin- and dabigatran-associated ICH presenting to Christchurch Hospital over a 15-year period. DNT data from 2013-2018 were compared between warfarin-related ICH (WRICH), dabigatran-related ICH (DRICH) and IS thrombolysis., Results: 172 WRICH were identified. Over time there were significant reductions in door-to-first-reversal-agent (r=-0.21, p=0.01), scan-to-first-reversal-agent (r=-0.27, p=0.001) and scan-to-prothrombin-complex-concentrate (PCC) (r=-0.33, p=0.001) times. In the 2013-2018 cohort, WRICH had significantly slower DNT, door-to-scan time and scan-to-needle time compared to DRICH and IS thrombolysis (all p<0.001). There was no statistical difference between DRICH and IS. Median DNT was 183 minutes for WRICH, 72 minutes for DRICH and 52 minutes for IS. Median time to repeat international normalised ratio was 231 minutes, and the median time to repeat thrombin clotting time was 825 minutes., Conclusion: Door-to-any-reversal-agent and scan-to-PCC times have improved over time, but they remain significantly longer than IS thrombolysis times. Monitoring of reversal is inadequate, particularly for WRICH receiving PCC., Competing Interests: Nil.

Objective: To assess whether patients prescribed four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4FPC) received less plasma during the following 24-hour period than those treated for the same indications who received only plasma., Introduction: It is unclear whether 4FPC is associated with a reduction in subsequent plasma transfusion. This is important for minimising transfusion-associated risks and for inventory management., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively studied patients treated for bleeding or coagulopathy. Individuals receiving 4FPC were matched by indication to patients treated with only plasma. Blood products received during 24-hour follow up were compared between 4FPC and plasma-only patients., Results: There was no difference in the number of patients receiving additional plasma (19 (21%) 4FPC patients vs 31 (34%) plasma-only patients, P = .07) nor in the median number of additional plasma units received (0 units for both groups, interquartile range [0, 0] for 4FPC patients vs [0, 1] for plasma-only patients, P = .09). Subgroup analysis comparing patients who received 4FPC for on-label vs off-label indications found no difference in the number of patients receiving plasma nor in the median number of plasma units received., Conclusion: 4FPC was prescribed to a diverse set of patients, and administration was not associated with reduced plasma transfusion at our institution., (© 2020 British Blood Transfusion Society.)

Background: Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) is widely used for urgent reversal of anticoagulation with warfarin, but the optimal 4F-PCC dosing approach is unknown. Herein, we sought to determine the efficacy of a novel fixed, weight-based dosing nomogram., Methods: We retrospectively studied consecutive adult patients receiving fixed, weight-based 4F-PCC dosing for warfarin reversal between 30 April 2009 and 31 December 2010. The primary outcome was reversal of warfarin anticoagulation, defined as INR ≤1.5 within 6 h. Secondary outcome was the occurrence of thromboembolic events., Results: A total of 227 patients (56% male), with a median age of 74 years and a median weight of 76kg were evaluated. The most common indications for 4F-PCC were active bleeding (37.4%: 12.7% intracranial, 12.3% gastrointestinal, 4.0% trauma, 8.4% other), reversal for a procedure (22.0%), reversal for surgery (29.5%) or other (11.1%). 66.1% of patients achieved an INR ≤1.5 within 6 h of 4F-PCC administration. 95.0% (57/60) of patients completed a planned procedure and 95.7% (67/70) of patients completed a planned surgery. The median baseline INR was 2.9 (1.5-10) and decreased significantly to a median of 1.3 (1.0-3.7) ( p < .001) post-4F-PCC administration. There was no statistically significant difference in response to a fixed, weight-based dose of 4F-PCC based on pre-PCC INR, as long as the pre-treatment INR was ≤ 4.5. Although the majority of patients in our study (99%) received doses over 1000IU, rates of thrombosis were low (1.8%)., Conclusion: Fixed, weight-based dosing of 4F-PCC is effective for reversing warfarin anticoagulation in patients with a pre-dosing INR ≤ 4.5.

Background: Hemorrhagic shock (HS) and trauma can result in an endotheliopathy of trauma, characterized by endothelial compromise, inflammation, and aberrant coagulation. Kcentra, a prothrombin concentrate, has been demonstrated to mitigate pulmonary vascular leak in a murine model of HS. We investigated the effects of Kcentra in a rat model of HS, to achieve physiologic endpoints of relevance., Methods: Rats subjected to a grade intravenous splenic injury and controlled hemorrhage for 60 minutes were resuscitated with shed volumes of (1) Lactated Ringer's (LR) solution, (2) LR + 20 IU/kg Kcentra, (3) LR + 50 IU/kg Kcentra, (4) rat fresh frozen plasma (RFFP), or (5) human fresh frozen plasma (HFFP). Blood was harvested for monitoring metabolic and coagulation function. Rat lungs were evaluated for lung injury and permeability., Results: Animals resuscitated with LR displayed a significant increase in pulmonary vascular permeability (sham, 407.9 ± 122.4; shock + LR, 2040 ± 1462). Resuscitation with RFFP (606.5 ± 169.3) reduced leak; however, treatment with Kcentra (HS + Kcentra [20 IU/kg]: 1792 ± 903.4, HS + Kcentra [50 IU/kg]: 1876 ± 1103), and HFFP (1450 ± 533.2) had no significant effect on permeability. Kcentra modestly altered clotting parameters. Metabolic measures, such as lactate, pH, and base deficit, were restored to baseline levels by both RFFP and HFFP, but not Kcentra or LR., Conclusion: Kcentra did not alter pulmonary vascular permeability, but modestly increased clotting potential in injured rats. This suggests that there may be a xenogenic reaction of human products in rats and that the effects of Kcentra on vascular stability may be distinct from its ability to modulate clotting. Our data indicate that the species chosen and utilized for in vivo preclinical testing of human derived blood products is of critical importance in determining their efficacy in animal models and is the primary impetus to communicate these results.

Background: Prothrombin Complex Concentrates (PCC) are prescribed for emergent warfarin reversal (EWR). The comparative effectiveness and safety among PCC products are not fully understood., Methods: Patients in an academic level one trauma center who received PCC3 or PCC4 for EWR were identified. Patient characteristics, PCC dose and time of dose, pre- and post-INR and time of measurement, fresh frozen plasma and vitamin K doses, and patient outcomes were collected. Patients whose pre-PCC International Normalized Ratio (INR) was > 6 h before PCC dose or the pre-post PCC INR was > 12 h were excluded. The primary outcome was achieving an INR ≤ 1.5 post PCC. Secondary outcomes were the change in INR over time, post PCC INR, thromboembolic events (TE), and death during hospital stay. Logistic regression modelled the primary outcome with and without a propensity score adjustment accounting for age, sex, actual body weight, dose, initial INR value, and time between INR measurements. Data are reported as median (IQR) or n (%) with p < 0.05 considered significant., Results: Eighty patients were included (PCC3 = 57, PCC4 = 23). More PCC4 patients achieved goal INR (87.0% vs. 31.6%, odds ratio (OR) = 14.4, 95% CI: 3.80-54.93, p < 0.001). This result remained true after adjusting for possible confounders (AOR = 10.7, 95% CI: 2.17-51.24, p < 0.001). The post-PCC INR was lower in the PCC4 group (1.3 (1.3-1.5) vs. 1.7 (1.5-2.0)). The INR change was greater for PCC4 (2.3 (1.3-3.3) vs. 1.1 (0.6-2.0), p = 0.003). Death during hospital stay (p = 0.52) and TE (p = 1.00) were not significantly different., Conclusions: PCC4 was associated with a higher achievement of goal INR than PCC3. This relationship was observed in the unadjusted and propensity score adjusted results.

Massive gastrointestinal hemorrhage is a life-threatening condition that can result from numerous causes and requires skilled resuscitation to decrease patient morbidity and mortality. Successful resuscitation begins with placement of large-bore intravenous or intraosseous access; early blood product administration; and early consultation with a gastroenterologist, interventional radiologist, and/or surgeon. Activate a massive transfusion protocol when initial red blood cell transfusion does not restore effective perfusion or the patient's shock index is greater than 1.0. Promptly reverse coagulopathies secondary to oral anticoagulant or antiplatelet use. Use thromboelastography or rotational thromboelastometry to guide further transfusions. Secure a definitive airway and minimize aspiration., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr A. Swaminathan is a deputy editor for EM:RAP and the managing editor of EM Abstracts. Dr K. D’Amore has nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4FPCC) is used for emergent warfarin reversal, but dosing remains controversial. Following approval, further studies have evaluated a variety of fixed-dose regimens. The studies utilized lower doses as compared with package insert dosing and provided data in regard to efficacy, safety, and cost savings. Further data are needed, however, to determine which fixed-dose regimen provides optimal efficacy and safety for emergent warfarin reversal., Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost-savings of a fixed-dose 4FPCC protocol., Methods: This multicentered, retrospective chart review of adult patients requiring 4FPCC for emergent warfarin reversal utilized a fixed-dose regimen of 1500 units. The 2 primary outcomes were the proportion of patients who achieved a post-4FPCC international normalized ratio (INR) of ≤1.5 and ≤2. Secondary outcomes included thrombotic events within 7 days of 4FPCC administration and survival to discharge. A cost analysis was also performed to identify potential cost savings., Results: Of the 64 patients included, 44 (68.8%) achieved a post-4FPCC INR ≤1.5, and 61 (95.3%) achieved a post-4FPCC INR ≤2.0. No thrombotic events were reported; 55 (85.9%) patients survived to hospital discharge. More than $1000 was saved per patient via utilization of the fixed-dose protocol., Conclusion and Relevance: A fixed-dose of 1500 units of 4FPCC successfully achieved a target INR of ≤1.5 in the majority of patients and resulted in no thrombotic events. This study adds to the data evaluating alternative 4FPCC dosing regimens in comparison to package insert recommended dosing.

Background: Anticoagulant therapy is common and complicates the operative management of acute and mixed-density subdural hematomas (SDHs). The risk of reoperation inferred by anticoagulant (AC) medication and the ability of reversal agents to reduce hemorrhagic complications in patients presenting with AC-associated SDHs are not fully understood., Methods: Data were collected for 288 consecutive patients treated with craniotomy or craniectomy for evacuation of an acute or mixed-density SDH between 2012 and 2017 at 2 academic institutions. Primary end points were reoperation within 30 days and functional outcome at discharge. Groups were compared based on AC use. Logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of reoperation and functional outcome at discharge., Results: Forty-six patients on ACs and 242 with no AC history were analyzed. All patients on AC underwent AC reversal before hematoma evacuation. Reoperation rates between groups were not significantly different (10.9% vs. 12.4%; P = 1.00); however, time to reoperation was significantly shorter in those on ACs (0.8 ± 1.1 days vs. 6.8 ± 10.4 days; P = 0.04). Aspirin use was independently associated with the need for reoperation (odds ratio, 3.05; confidence interval, 1.30-7.19; P = 0.01). Patients taking ACs were significantly older, had more medical comorbidities and were more likely to have a higher modified Rankin Scale score at discharge., Conclusions: Anticoagulant use was not associated with an increased reoperation rate, suggesting that reversal of AC may have eliminated the hemorrhagic risk conferred by these medications. Patients on ACs were significantly older, harbored more medical comorbidities, and had a worse functional outcome at discharge., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The use of electronic clinical decision support (CDS) is becoming common to change historically common clinical practices considered outdated by current guidelines. Preimplementation design of CDS tools is key to their success in changing clinical behaviors. Unfortunately, there are no established protocols for CDS tool development, and CDS failure can result from even small design flaws. This paper describes an example of a design oversight and how correction resulted in CDS success., Study Design and Methods: We performed a retrospective review of compliance with a CDS tool to encourage the use of prothrombin complex concentrate over plasma transfusion for the emergent reversal of warfarin. We identified a potential design flaw, made the necessary modifications, and repeated the compliance review., Results: After CDS, plasma orders declined by 150 units/mo; however, 48% of orders placed for non-warfarin coagulopathy were still for warfarin reversal. Hospital-wide, this noncompliance was 36% and was 80% in the emergency department. By simply relocating the qualifier "NOT on warfarin" from the end to the beginning of the order, noncompliance for warfarin reversal was reduced to 5% (P < .0001 by chi-square)., Conclusions: The successful use of electronic clinical decision support in the electronic medical record can depend on optimal design. Missing even small design elements such as the positioning of key terms within the tool can result in an ineffective CDS. Important design strategies to avoid poor performance are discussed as they relate to the CDS tool we describe., (© 2020 AABB.)

Objective: Administration of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) is recommended for vitamin K antagonist (VKA) reversal in patients with severe bleeding complications. However, there are only limited data available on its use for VKA reversal in patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH)., Methods: Data from all anticoagulated patients referred to our hospital for treatment of traumatic ICH and who received PCC for anticoagulation reversal were retrospectively analysed with specific focus on bleeding and thromboembolic complications during the further in-hospital course., Results: A total of 142 patients were included in the present study. The median age was 78 years (Interquartile range [IQR]: 72-84) and the median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on admission was 12 (IQR: 7-14). Median International Normalized Ratio (INR) on admission was 2.5 [IQR: 2.0-3.3] and decreased to 1.2 [IQR: 1.1-1.3] following administration of a median dose of 2000 I.U. PCC [IQR: 1500-2625]. The in-hospital mortality rate was 13% and the median GCS of survivors at discharge was 14 [IQR: 12-15]. Thromboembolic events after PCC administration occurred in 4 patients (2.8%). The overall one-year mortality rate in this patient cohort was 49%., Conclusions: PCC administration rapidly normalises INR and facilitates urgent neurosurgical procedures in anticoagulated patients with traumatic ICH., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Christopher Beynon has received honoraria outside the submitted work for lectures and/or consultancy support from Bayer Healthcare, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, and TEM International/IL-Werfen. Timolaos Rizos has received honoraria outside the submitted work for lectures and/or consultancy support from Bayer Healthcare, BMS Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Daiichi Sankyo. Oliver S Sakowitz received honoraria outside the submitted work for lectures from CSL Behring. For the remaining authors no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study investigated the percentage of patients who achieved hemostasis with 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4-factor PCC) 35 U/kg. The primary end point was to determine the effect of 4-factor PCC 35 U/kg on bleeding progression, assessed using computed tomography., Methods: This was a retrospective, observational, single-center study conducted in patients with a major bleed admitted to a level 1 trauma center from May 1, 2013, to June 15, 2015, who received 4-factor PCC 35 U/kg for reversal of a direct factor Xa inhibitor taken prior to admission., Results: Thirty-three patients were included in the study, with 31 patients in the final analysis. The mean (standard deviation) age was 73 (14.8) years; 54.5% of patients were female. Of the 33 patients, 13 presented with a traumatic brain injury, 9 with an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, 8 with an intracerebral hemorrhage, 1 with a gastrointestinal bleed, 1 with a hematoma with active extravasation, and 1 with an intra-abdominal bleed. The most frequently used direct factor Xa inhibitor was rivaroxaban (81.8%). Overall, 83.8% of patients achieved hemostasis with 4-factor PCC 35 U/kg. Progression of hemorrhage was observed in 4 patients on repeat computed tomography scan and 1 patient had continued surgical bleeding. No thromboembolic events were reported., Conclusions: Low-dose, 4-factor PCC 35 U/kg appeared to produce hemostasis in a majority of the patients. This may be an effective dosing regimen for anticoagulant reversal of factor Xa inhibitors in clinically bleeding patients.

Introduction: Transfusion therapy in hemorrhaging trauma patients is associated with the development of thromboembolic events. It is unknown whether current resuscitation strategies, including large volumes of plasma and early administration of procoagulant therapy, increases this risk., Methods: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase. Studies were screened by two independent reviewers and included if they reported on thromboembolic events in patients with severe trauma (injury severity score ≥16) who received transfusion of at least 1 unit of red blood cells. The ratio by which blood products were transfused, as well as use of procoagulant or antifibrinolytic medication, was recorded., Results: A total of 40 studies with 11.074 bleeding trauma patients were included, in which 1.145 thromboembolic events were reported, yielding an incidence of 10% thromboembolic events. In studies performing routine screening for thromboembolic complications, the incidence ranged from 12% to 23%. The risk of thromboembolic events was increased after administration of tranexamic acid (TXA; odds ratio [OR], 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-4.1; p < 0.001) and fibrinogen concentrate (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.0-4.2; p = 0.04). Blood product ratio, the use of prothrombin complex concentrate or recombinant factor VIIa were not associated with thromboembolic events., Conclusion: This systematic review identified an incidence of thromboembolic events of 10% in severely injured bleeding trauma patients. The use of TXA and fibrinogen concentrate was associated with the development of thromboembolic complications., (© 2020 The Authors. Transfusion published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of AABB.)

Background: With the approval of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC, Kcentra) for the reversal of vitamin K antagonist-associated bleeding in the United States, it has become a relatively common practice for 4F-PCC to be used in an "off-label" fashion to correct coagulopathy caused by direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). However, the efficacy and safety of 4F-PCC have not been well studied in this scenario., Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study on the off-label use of 4F-PCC for reversing bleeding associated with DOACs in a level 1 trauma centre between November 2014 and February 2017. International normalised ratio (INR) and Hgb prior to and post 4F-PCC infusion, clinical outcome and thromboembolic events within 24 hours and 45 days of 4F-PCC administration were collected., Results: We identified 24 patients on DOACs who received 4F-PCC for severe haemorrhage and emergent surgeries. Most patients showed improved haemorrhage as demonstrated by stabilised intracranial haemorrhage sizes and/or by steady Hgb levels. No thromboembolic event was identified within 24 hours of 4F-PCC administration. However, 16.7% patients (4/24) experienced thromboembolic events 2 to 45 days after receiving 4F-PCC., Conclusion: Our data showed that 4F-PCC was relatively efficient in correcting DOAC-induced coagulopathy. We did notice that 16.7% of patients experienced some form of thromboembolic events in the days-to-weeks after 4F-PCC administration, although the imputability of 4F-PCC in these processes (vs their underlying disease) is difficult to determine. Additional prospective studies would be warranted to further evaluate the safety of 4F-PCC for this off-label indication., (© 2020 British Blood Transfusion Society.)

Hemophilia A (HA) and B (HB) are X-linked bleeding disorders caused by mutations in the F8 or F9 gene that result in the absence, or reduced activity, of the corresponding clotting factor. The severity of bleeding and related complications is proportional to the amount of residual circulating functional factor. The development of a safe and effective hemophilia treatment lasted several decades and has been mainly based on clotting factor replacement. Advances in the engineering and manufacturing of clotting concentrates have led to the widespread availability of extended half-life products that reduced the number of intravenous infusions needed to achieve adequate trough levels. The recent development of new nonfactor replacement treatments and biotechnology techniques has offered therapeutic alternatives for hemophilia patients with and without inhibitors. These are characterized by an easier route of administration, low immunogenicity, and, regarding gene therapy and cell-based treatments, potential long-term protection from bleeding after a single treatment course. In this review, we analyze recent progresses in the management of hemophilia and discuss opportunities and challenges., Competing Interests: Dr. Matino reports personal fees from Sanofi, grants and personal fees from Sobi, personal fees from UBS, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from NovoNordisk, personal fees from BIOVIIIX, outside the submitted work., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Objectives: Despite the availability of FDA-labeled anticoagulant reversal agents, there is considerable variability in clinical practice as to the regimen and agent used for reversal. The objective of this study was to characterize the current practices of pharmacists surrounding the reversal of anticoagulant-associated life-threatening hemorrhage. Methods : A cross-sectional analysis of critical care and emergency medicine pharmacists. Current practice was compared for the type of hospital, country region, and type of ordering physician. In addition, pharmacists were asked to rank their involvement with activities involved with the reversal of anticoagulants. Respondents ranked their involvement with these activities as either never involved, rarely involved, occasionally involved, frequently involved, or always involved. Results :281 respondents were included. The majority used 4-factor PCC for warfarin reversal (92.9%) and factor Xa inhibitor reversal (79.7%). However, only 58.7% used the labeled dose of 4-PCC for warfarin reversal. Of the 30.6% that utilized a fixed-dose regimen, the most common regimen was 1500 units once. A higher proportion of respondents practicing in a teaching hospital reported that they used activated prothrombin complex concentrates for reversal of factor Xa inhibitor (22 [12.2%] vs. 5 [5%]; p < 0.05) or coagulation factor Xa (recombinant)-inactivated-zhzo (31 [17.2%] vs. 5 [5%]; p < 0.05). In addition, the majority of respondents utilized idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal. The only involvement activity in which <50% of respondents said they were frequently involved or always involved was 'administration of reversal agent.' Conclusions : There is considerable variability in which agents were utilized for anticoagulant-associated bleeding reversal.

Patients who require urgent warfarin reversal often receive four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC), which is traditionally dosed according to weight and initial INR. Our institution implemented a fixed-dose 4F-PCC strategy, using an initial dose of 1500 units. We evaluated the frequency with which the initial fixed dose 4F-PCC was inadequate, as defined by need for supplemental dosing. As part of the protocol, if the initial fixed-dose 4F-PCC is administered and does not achieve INR goal, then the remainder of the standard weight- and INR-based dosing can be given. During the study period, 63 patients on warfarin received 4F-PCC using the fixed-dose protocol. Based on the INR following 4F-PCC administration, 11 patients (17%) were eligible to receive a supplemental dose based on failure to achieve their specified INR goal. Two of the 11 patients eligible for supplemental 4F-PCC dosing received the second dose, both with initial supratherapeutic INRs > 3.5. We found that most patients given an initial fixed-dose 4F-PCC achieved their INR goals, and of those who did not, most did not receive supplemental dosing, suggesting that clinical providers felt that adequate hemostasis had been achieved. In addition, fixed-dose 4F-PCC was able to be given rapidly, with few dosing errors, suggesting that this is a reasonable option for 4F-PCC delivery.